pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12519 · v1 · pith:YI3NA5C7new · submitted 2026-06-10 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Observing Cosmic Reheating with the expanded Simons Observatory

Lei Ming , Marco Drewes This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords cosmic reheatingwarm inflationSimons Observatoryprimordial gravitational wavestensor-to-scalar ratioinflaton couplingQCDaxion experiments
0
0 comments X

The pith

If primordial gravitational waves are detected, the expanded Simons Observatory could measure the reheating temperature and inflaton coupling to a few percent in QCD-driven warm inflation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines how adding three small aperture telescopes to the Simons Observatory by 2027, bringing the total to six, would improve prospects for studying the reheating phase after inflation. It assumes a future discovery of primordial gravitational waves at tensor-to-scalar ratios of 0.0036 or 0.01, which would fix the inflation scale in plateau models and thereby determine the order of magnitude of the reheating temperature along with the strength of inflaton interactions. In the specific QCD-driven warm inflation scenario, the same data under optimistic assumptions could constrain both the reheating temperature and the inflaton-gluon coupling to a precision of a few percent. This level of measurement would generate concrete predictions that can be tested in axion experiments searching for the inflaton.

Core claim

A detection of primordial gravitational waves at benchmark tensor-to-scalar ratios with the expanded Simons Observatory would fix the scale of inflation and thereby enable determination of the reheating temperature and inflaton coupling strength. In QCD-driven warm inflation, optimistic assumptions allow these quantities to be measured at a few percent precision, which in turn supplies clear targets for complementary inflaton searches in axion experiments.

What carries the argument

The mapping from an observed tensor-to-scalar ratio to the post-inflationary reheating temperature and inflaton-gluon coupling in QCD-driven warm inflation models.

If this is right

  • In plateau models of inflation an observed tensor-to-scalar ratio would fix the order of magnitude of the reheating temperature and the inflaton interaction strength.
  • In QCD-driven warm inflation the reheating temperature and inflaton-gluon coupling could both be determined to a few percent.
  • The resulting values would generate specific predictions for inflaton searches in axion experiments.
  • Successful measurements would link cosmic microwave background data directly to laboratory probes of the mechanism that sets the initial conditions of the hot Big Bang.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same data combination could be applied to other variants of warm inflation to test whether the few-percent precision remains achievable.
  • A confirmed measurement would narrow the viable parameter space for axion-like particles that could serve as the inflaton.
  • Complementary constraints from direct axion searches could be combined with the cosmological data to over-constrain the model and test its consistency.

Load-bearing premise

Primordial gravitational waves will be discovered at the benchmark tensor-to-scalar ratios of 0.0036 or 0.01, the QCD-driven warm inflation model correctly describes the post-inflationary dynamics, and the optimistic experimental assumptions hold.

What would settle it

A non-detection of primordial gravitational waves at tensor-to-scalar ratios around 0.0036 or 0.01, or a measured reheating temperature and coupling that fall outside the few-percent precision window predicted by the QCD-driven warm inflation model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12519 by Lei Ming, Marco Drewes.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Same as Fig. 2, but for the RGI model (3). In the gray [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Same as Fig. 2, but for the MHI model (4). In the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: One-dimensional posterior distribution function for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7: Same as Fig. 6, but for the scenarios SO(pess.)B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9: Same as Fig. 6, but for the RGI model (3) in scenarios [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12: Same as Fig. 6, but for the MHI model (4) in sce [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13: Same as Fig. 7, but for the MHI model (4) in sce [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15: Posteriors obtained by combining the optimistic SO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Simons Observatory will be extended by three Small Aperture Telescopes by 2027, increasing the total number of these instruments to six. We study the prospects for probing the reheating temperature and the inflaton coupling with this configuration, assuming a discovery of primordial gravitational waves in benchmark scenarios with a tensor-to-scalar ratio r=0.0036 or r=0.01. In popular plateau models of inflation, such an observation would fix the scale of inflation and enable determination of the order of magnitude of the reheating temperature and the inflaton interactions. For QCD-driven Warm Inflation the reheating temperature and inflaton coupling to gluons could, under optimistic assumptions, be measured with a precision of a few percent. Such a measurement would imply a clear prediction for complementary inflaton searches in axion experiments, paving the way toward probing the mechanism responsible for the initial conditions of the hot Big Bang in the laboratory.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the prospects for constraining the reheating temperature and the inflaton-gluon coupling in QCD-driven warm inflation using the expanded Simons Observatory (six Small Aperture Telescopes). It assumes a future detection of primordial gravitational waves at benchmark tensor-to-scalar ratios r=0.0036 or r=0.01, which would fix the inflationary scale, and claims that under optimistic assumptions the reheating parameters could be measured to a few percent precision, yielding testable predictions for axion experiments.

Significance. If the stated assumptions on experimental performance and model validity hold, the work would provide a concrete pathway to link CMB tensor measurements to post-inflationary dynamics and laboratory searches, strengthening the connection between early-universe cosmology and particle physics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of few-percent precision on reheating temperature and inflaton coupling is explicitly conditional on (i) a tensor detection at the quoted benchmark r values, (ii) the QCD warm-inflation dynamics correctly governing post-inflationary evolution, and (iii) unspecified 'optimistic assumptions' on noise and foreground performance; the manuscript does not appear to quantify how the constraints degrade when any of these fail.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: no robustness test against variations in warm-inflation parameters or against non-detection of tensors is indicated, which is load-bearing because the quoted precisions are presented as achievable only under the benchmark assumptions.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should briefly state the key optimistic assumptions (e.g., achieved noise levels or foreground residuals) so that the precision claims can be evaluated without the full text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. The two major comments both concern the abstract and correctly note that our headline claims are conditional on specific assumptions. We will revise the abstract to make these conditions more explicit and to clarify the scope of the quoted precisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the headline claim of few-percent precision on reheating temperature and inflaton coupling is explicitly conditional on (i) a tensor detection at the quoted benchmark r values, (ii) the QCD warm-inflation dynamics correctly governing post-inflationary evolution, and (iii) unspecified 'optimistic assumptions' on noise and foreground performance; the manuscript does not appear to quantify how the constraints degrade when any of these fail.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract does not quantify degradation under relaxed assumptions. In the revised version we will update the abstract to list the three conditions explicitly and to state that the few-percent precision applies only under the optimistic assumptions, with the expectation that constraints would weaken otherwise. A full quantitative degradation study lies outside the scope of the present work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: no robustness test against variations in warm-inflation parameters or against non-detection of tensors is indicated, which is load-bearing because the quoted precisions are presented as achievable only under the benchmark assumptions.

    Authors: The manuscript is scoped to the case of a future tensor detection at the stated benchmark r values within QCD-driven warm inflation. We do not claim or perform robustness tests for non-detection or for wide variations away from the benchmarks. We will revise the abstract to reinforce that the reported precisions are specific to these benchmark scenarios, thereby addressing the load-bearing conditional presentation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; forecasts are model-based projections conditional on external assumptions

full rationale

The paper presents forecasting calculations for reheating parameters under the assumption of a primordial GW detection at fixed benchmark r values (0.0036 or 0.01) together with the QCD warm inflation model and optimistic experimental performance. These are standard parameter-estimation projections that map input assumptions (inflation scale fixed by r, model dynamics, noise levels) through explicit transfer functions and likelihoods to output precisions; the outputs are not equivalent to the inputs by definition, nor are any fitted parameters renamed as predictions. No load-bearing step reduces to a self-citation chain, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorem imported from the authors' prior work. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks once the stated assumptions are granted.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of plateau and QCD-driven warm inflation models and on the occurrence of a future gravitational-wave detection at the stated benchmark values. No free parameters are explicitly fitted in the abstract; the r values are treated as external benchmarks.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Plateau models of inflation and QCD-driven warm inflation correctly describe the dynamics from inflation through reheating.
    All numerical prospects are computed inside these two model classes.
  • domain assumption A detection of primordial gravitational waves at r=0.0036 or r=0.01 will occur.
    The entire forecasting exercise is conditioned on this future observation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5678 in / 1470 out tokens · 35284 ms · 2026-06-27T08:30:13.453001+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

99 extracted references · 41 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The Chinese AliCPT array [36, 37] will provide data comple- mentary to the SO due to its geographic location in the Northern Hemisphere

    has been halted, the two most sensitive experiments that can achieve this goal are the Japanese LiteBIRD satellite [34] and the Simons Observatory (SO) [35]. The Chinese AliCPT array [36, 37] will provide data comple- mentary to the SO due to its geographic location in the Northern Hemisphere. We have previously assessed the sensitivity of LiteBIRD [38, 3...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  2. [2]

    this directly translates a given value ofxinto a reheating temperatureT re. The results show that SO Planck+BK18(68%) Planck+BK18(95%) Full SO(95%, opt.) Full SO(95%, pess.) 0.955 0.960 0.965 0.970 0.975 0.980 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 ns r α=0.5 in RGI model Nre<0 Nk =50 Tre<10MeV Nk =60 Planck+BK18(68%) Planck+BK18(95%) Full SO(95%, opt.) Full SO(95...

  3. [3]

    Friedman, On the Curvature of space, Z

    A. Friedman, On the Curvature of space, Z. Phys.10, 377 (1922)

    1922

  4. [4]

    Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc

    G. Lemaitre, A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Growing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extragalactic Nebulae, Annales Soc. Sci. Bruxelles A 47, 49 (1927)

    1927

  5. [5]

    R. A. Alpher, H. Bethe, and G. Gamow, The origin of chemical elements, Phys. Rev.73, 803 (1948)

    1948

  6. [6]

    Cortˆ es, O

    M. Cortˆ es, O. Lahav, and A. R. Liddle, The Cosmolog- ical Parameters (2025) (2026), arXiv:2602.13523 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    See [89] for an overview of hints for deviations from the ΛCDM model

  8. [8]

    Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys

    S. Navaset al.(Particle Data Group), Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D110, 030001 (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    Established observational facts that cannot be described in this framework include the microphysical composition of the Dark Matter [90] and the origin of the matter- antimatter asymmetry of the Universe [91]; it is not clear whether the explanations for other tensions or anomalies [89, 92] require the existence of New Physics

  10. [10]

    A. A. Starobinsky, A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity, Phys. Lett. B91, 99 (1980)

    1980

  11. [11]

    A. H. Guth, The Inflationary Universe: A Possible Solu- tion to the Horizon and Flatness Problems, Phys. Rev. D23, 347 (1981)

    1981

  12. [12]

    A. D. Linde, A New Inflationary Universe Scenario: A Possible Solution of the Horizon, Flatness, Homogeneity, Isotropy and Primordial Monopole Problems, Phys. Lett. B108, 389 (1982)

    1982

  13. [13]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Encyclopædia Inflationaris: Opiparous Edition, Phys. Dark Univ.5-6, 75 (2014), arXiv:1303.3787 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2014

  14. [14]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Cosmic Infla- tion at the crossroads, JCAP07, 087, arXiv:2404.10647 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  15. [15]

    Albrecht, P

    A. Albrecht, P. J. Steinhardt, M. S. Turner, and F. Wilczek, Reheating an Inflationary Universe, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1437 (1982)

    1982

  16. [16]

    A. D. Dolgov and D. P. Kirilova, ON PARTICLE CRE- ATION BY A TIME DEPENDENT SCALAR FIELD, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys.51, 172 (1990)

    1990

  17. [17]

    J. H. Traschen and R. H. Brandenberger, Particle Pro- duction During Out-of-equilibrium Phase Transitions, Phys. Rev. D42, 2491 (1990)

    1990

  18. [18]

    Shtanov, J

    Y. Shtanov, J. H. Traschen, and R. H. Brandenberger, Universe reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D51, 5438 (1995), arXiv:hep-ph/9407247

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  19. [19]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Re- heating after inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 3195 (1994), arXiv:hep-th/9405187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  20. [20]

    Boyanovsky, H

    D. Boyanovsky, H. J. de Vega, R. Holman, and J. F. J. Salgado, Analytic and numerical study of preheating dynamics, Phys. Rev. D54, 7570 (1996), arXiv:hep- ph/9608205

    arXiv 1996

  21. [21]

    Kofman, A

    L. Kofman, A. D. Linde, and A. A. Starobinsky, Towards the theory of reheating after inflation, Phys. Rev. D56, 3258 (1997), arXiv:hep-ph/9704452

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  22. [22]

    J. E. Lidsey, A. R. Liddle, E. W. Kolb, E. J. Copeland, T. Barreiro, and M. Abney, Reconstructing the inflation potential : An overview, Rev. Mod. Phys.69, 373 (1997), arXiv:astro-ph/9508078

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  23. [23]

    Martin and C

    J. Martin and C. Ringeval, First CMB Constraints on the Inflationary Reheating Temperature, Phys. Rev. D 82, 023511 (2010), arXiv:1004.5525 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  24. [24]

    Adshead, R

    P. Adshead, R. Easther, J. Pritchard, and A. Loeb, Infla- tion and the Scale Dependent Spectral Index: Prospects and Strategies, JCAP02, 021, arXiv:1007.3748 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Mielczarek, Reheating temperature from the CMB, Phys

    J. Mielczarek, Reheating temperature from the CMB, Phys. Rev. D83, 023502 (2011), arXiv:1009.2359 [astro- ph.CO]. 13

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  26. [26]

    Easther and H

    R. Easther and H. V. Peiris, Bayesian Analysis of Infla- tion II: Model Selection and Constraints on Reheating, Phys. Rev. D85, 103533 (2012), arXiv:1112.0326 [astro- ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  27. [27]

    L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski, and J. Wang, Reheating con- straints to inflationary models, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 041302 (2014), arXiv:1404.6704 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  28. [28]

    Drewes, What can the CMB tell about the microphysics of cosmic reheating?, JCAP03, 013, arXiv:1511.03280 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Drewes, What can the CMB tell about the microphysics of cosmic reheating?, JCAP03, 013, arXiv:1511.03280 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  29. [29]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Shortcomings of New Parametrizations of Inflation, Phys. Rev. D94, 123521 (2016), arXiv:1609.04739 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  30. [30]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Observing Infla- tionary Reheating, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 081303 (2015), arXiv:1410.7958 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, Information Gain on Reheating: the One Bit Milestone, Phys. Rev. D93, 103532 (2016), arXiv:1603.02606 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  32. [32]

    By this we mean the ability to impose both an upper and a lower bound on a quantity from data

  33. [33]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, How Well Can Fu- ture CMB Missions Constrain Cosmic Inflation?, JCAP 10, 038, arXiv:1407.4034 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Drewes, Measuring the inflaton coupling in the CMB, JCAP09, 069, arXiv:1903.09599 [astro-ph.CO]

    M. Drewes, Measuring the inflaton coupling in the CMB, JCAP09, 069, arXiv:1903.09599 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 1903

  35. [35]

    Abazajianet al.(CMB-S4), CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves, Astro- phys

    K. Abazajianet al.(CMB-S4), CMB-S4: Forecasting Constraints on Primordial Gravitational Waves, Astro- phys. J.926, 54 (2022), arXiv:2008.12619 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  36. [36]

    Sugaiet al., Updated Design of the CMB Polariza- tion Experiment Satellite LiteBIRD, J

    H. Sugaiet al., Updated Design of the CMB Polariza- tion Experiment Satellite LiteBIRD, J. Low. Temp. Phys. 199, 1107 (2020), arXiv:2001.01724 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Adeet al.(Simons Observatory), The Simons Ob- servatory: Science goals and forecasts, JCAP02, 056, arXiv:1808.07445 [astro-ph.CO]

    P. Adeet al.(Simons Observatory), The Simons Ob- servatory: Science goals and forecasts, JCAP02, 056, arXiv:1808.07445 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Liet al., Probing Primordial Gravitational Waves: Ali CMB Polarization Telescope, Natl

    H. Liet al., Probing Primordial Gravitational Waves: Ali CMB Polarization Telescope, Natl. Sci. Rev.6, 145 (2019), arXiv:1710.03047 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  39. [39]

    Li, S.-Y

    H. Li, S.-Y. Li, Y. Liu, Y.-P. Li, and X. Zhang, Tibet’s window on primordial gravitational waves, Nature As- tron.2, 104 (2018), arXiv:1802.08455 [astro-ph.IM]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  40. [40]

    Drewes and L

    M. Drewes and L. Ming, Connecting Cosmic Infla- tion to Particle Physics with LiteBIRD, CMB-S4, EU- CLID, and SKA, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 031001 (2024), arXiv:2208.07609 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Drewes, L

    M. Drewes, L. Ming, and I. Oldengott, LiteBIRD and CMB-S4 sensitivities to reheating in plateau models of inflation, JCAP05, 081, arXiv:2303.13503 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Y. Liu, L. Ming, M. Drewes, and H. Li, AliCPT sen- sitivity to cosmic reheating, Phys. Rev. D113, 103507 (2026), arXiv:2503.21207 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Abitbolet al.(Simons Observatory), The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts for the en- hanced Large Aperture Telescope, JCAP08, 034, arXiv:2503.00636 [astro-ph.IM]

    M. Abitbolet al.(Simons Observatory), The Simons Observatory: science goals and forecasts for the en- hanced Large Aperture Telescope, JCAP08, 034, arXiv:2503.00636 [astro-ph.IM]

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    I. Abril-Cabezaset al.(Simons Observatory), The Si- mons Observatory: forecasted constraints on primordial gravitational waves with the expanded array of Small Aperture Telescopes, JCAP04, 051, arXiv:2512.15833 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv

  45. [45]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Non-minimal Inflationary At- tractors, JCAP10, 033, arXiv:1307.7938 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  46. [46]

    Kallosh and A

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, Universality Class in Conformal Inflation, JCAP07, 002, arXiv:1306.5220 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  47. [47]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, and A. Linde,α- Attractors: Planck, LHC and Dark Energy, JHEP10, 147, arXiv:1506.01708 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  48. [48]

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, and A. Linde, Cosmological Attractors and Initial Conditions for Inflation, Phys. Rev. D92, 063519 (2015), arXiv:1506.00936 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Fairbairn, L

    M. Fairbairn, L. Lopez Honorez, and M. H. G. Tytgat, Radion assisted gauge inflation, Phys. Rev. D67, 101302 (2003), arXiv:hep-ph/0302160

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  50. [50]

    Martin, C

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, R. Trotta, and V. Vennin, The Best Inflationary Models After Planck, JCAP03, 039, arXiv:1312.3529 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    B. K. Pal, S. Pal, and B. Basu, Mutated Hilltop Inflation : A Natural Choice for Early Universe, JCAP01, 029, arXiv:0908.2302 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Kumar Pal, Mutated hilltop inflation revisited, Eur

    B. Kumar Pal, Mutated hilltop inflation revisited, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 358 (2018), arXiv:1711.00833 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  53. [53]

    K. V. Berghaus, M. Drewes, and S. Zell, Warm Inflation with the Standard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 171002 (2025), arXiv:2503.18829 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Notable exceptions are Starobinsky inflation [8], Higgs inflation [93] and the QCD-WI model (1) used here

  55. [55]

    M. A. Amin, M. P. Hertzberg, D. I. Kaiser, and J. Karouby, Nonperturbative Dynamics Of Reheating Af- ter Inflation: A Review, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D24, 1530003 (2014), arXiv:1410.3808 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  56. [56]

    L. D. McLerran, E. Mottola, and M. E. Shaposhnikov, Sphalerons and Axion Dynamics in High Temperature QCD, Phys. Rev. D43, 2027 (1991)

    2027

  57. [57]

    Laine and S

    M. Laine and S. Procacci, Minimal warm infla- tion with complete medium response, JCAP06, 031, arXiv:2102.09913 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    In the regime where Γ strongly affects the dynamics of the background fieldφa better approximation is given by Γ =N 5 c α5 sT 3/[2f 2(1+2N f N 4 c α5 sT Mpl/(V/3) 1/2)] [51]

  59. [59]

    Berera, Warm inflation, Phys

    A. Berera, Warm inflation, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3218 (1995), arXiv:astro-ph/9509049

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  60. [60]

    Kamali, M

    V. Kamali, M. Motaharfar, and R. O. Ramos, Recent Developments in Warm Inflation, Universe9, 124 (2023), arXiv:2302.02827 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, Constraints Imposed by CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. D16, 1791 (1977)

    1977

  62. [62]

    R. D. Peccei and H. R. Quinn, CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.38, 1440 (1977)

    1977

  63. [63]

    Wilczek, Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 279 (1978)

    1978

  64. [64]

    Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A New Light Boson?, Phys. Rev. Lett.40, 223 (1978)

    1978

  65. [65]

    Specifying its origin in the UV is not required for the present analysis; it could, e.g., originate from gravitational effects [95]

    This breaking is sufficiently soft thatVis protected from the problems [94] which haunt the original warm infla- tion proposal [57]. Specifying its origin in the UV is not required for the present analysis; it could, e.g., originate from gravitational effects [95]

  66. [66]

    Antelet al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report, Eur

    C. Antelet al., Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 1122 (2023), arXiv:2305.01715 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  67. [67]

    In addition to finding the inflaton in the laboratory, ob- serving the cosmological bispectrum [81] would provide another test of QCD-WI

  68. [68]

    As a parametrization of the duration of reheating, the use ofydoes not introduce any further assumptions and can (for fixedVandg ∗) be used equivalently toT re or Nre, only its interpretation as a microphysical coupling 14 constant is ambiguous if (6) is strongly violated [32, 77]

  69. [69]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  70. [70]

    given in [39]

    For the model (1) the constraint imposed by fixingAs can only be implemented numerically, for the cold plateau models the analytic relations are e.g. given in [39]

  71. [71]

    Barbieri, T

    N. Barbieri, T. Brinckmann, S. Gariazzo, M. Lat- tanzi, S. Pastor, and O. Pisanti, Current Constraints on Cosmological Scenarios with Very Low Reheating Temperatures, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 181003 (2025), arXiv:2501.01369 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2025

  72. [72]

    Wolzet al., The Simons Observatory: pipeline com- parison and validation for large-scale B-modes, Astron

    K. Wolzet al., The Simons Observatory: pipeline com- parison and validation for large-scale B-modes, Astron. Astrophys.686, A16 (2024), arXiv:2302.04276 [astro- ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  73. [73]

    More precisely, the authors of [42] assumed that the first additional MF SAT starts observations half-way through the second year, and the final two instruments (a second additional MF SAT, and the additional LF SAT) start observations at the start of the third year

  74. [74]

    We note that the interpretation ofσ r as a variance is only indicative; especially for ¯r= 0.0036 it is restricted to the 1σ-level due to the non-Gaussian shape of the full likelihood for small values ofr, while for larger values of ¯rits range of validity increases. In any case, the ability to remove foregrounds will have a stronger impact on the precisi...

  75. [75]

    P. A. R. Adeet al.(BICEP, Keck), Improved Con- straints on Primordial Gravitational Waves using Planck, WMAP, and BICEP/Keck Observations through the 2018 Observing Season, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 151301 (2021), arXiv:2110.00483 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Louiset al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, JCAP11, 062, arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    T. Louiset al.(Atacama Cosmology Telescope), The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 power spectra, likelihoods and ΛCDM parameters, JCAP11, 062, arXiv:2503.14452 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  77. [77]

    In warm inflation scenarios there is no reheating in the literal sense because the thermal plasma of particles is already present during inflation

    Practically this amounts toN re = 0. In warm inflation scenarios there is no reheating in the literal sense because the thermal plasma of particles is already present during inflation. However, in principle a number ofe-foldsN re could pass between the moment when ¨a <0 and the moment when the radiation’s energy density exceeds that ofφ. In [51] it was es...

  78. [78]

    The precise relations betweenM,αand observables (as well as the quantitiesφ k,N k,N re etc.) used below are well-known for the models (2)-(4); for a summary we refer the reader to [39, 77]

  79. [79]

    Drewes, Y

    M. Drewes, Y. Georis, M. A. S. Mohammed, and S. Zell, Thermal effects on Dark Matter production during cos- mic reheating (2026), arXiv:2604.16085 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  80. [80]

    Sprenger, M

    T. Sprenger, M. Archidiacono, T. Brinckmann, S. Clesse, and J. Lesgourgues, Cosmology in the era of Eu- clid and the Square Kilometre Array, JCAP02, 047, arXiv:1801.08331 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

Showing first 80 references.