pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12681 · v1 · pith:BCCA3AFUnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ⚛️ nucl-th

Analytic calculator for determination of γ-ray angular distribution coefficients and tensors in aligned and partially-aligned nuclei

A.M. Hurst , D.A. Matters , T. Kawano , M. Cromaz This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 07:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ nucl-th
keywords gamma-ray angular distributionsstatistical tensorsaligned nucleiClebsch-Gordan coefficientsRacah coefficientsWigner symbolsnuclear structureangular momentum coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

A program calculates complete sets of precise gamma-ray angular distribution coefficients and statistical tensors for aligned nuclei.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a program that computes a complete set of precise gamma-ray angular distribution coefficients and statistical tensors in maximally-aligned and partially-aligned nuclei. No constraints are placed on input arguments that arise in typical nuclear structure and reaction calculations. The same program functions as a stand-alone calculator for exact values of Clebsch-Gordan and Racah coefficients along with Wigner 3-j, 6-j, and 9-j symbols and Gaunt coefficients. These quantities supply the angular-momentum machinery needed to interpret gamma-ray emission patterns from excited nuclear states.

Core claim

The paper claims that a program has been developed to calculate a complete set of precise γ-ray angular distribution coefficients and statistical tensors in maximally- and partially-aligned nuclei with no imposed constraint on any arguments likely to arise in practice. The program can also be used as a stand-alone vector-coupling calculator for the exact evaluation of Clebsch-Gordan and Racah coefficients, the Wigner 3-j, 6-j, and 9-j symbols, and Gaunt coefficients.

What carries the argument

Analytic expressions for γ-ray angular distribution coefficients and statistical tensors, evaluated through exact vector-coupling calculations.

If this is right

  • Nuclear physicists can obtain exact coefficients for any practical combination of spins, multipolarities, and alignment parameters without approximation limits.
  • The tool supplies exact values for the full set of angular-momentum recoupling symbols needed in quantum calculations.
  • Data analysis of gamma-ray angular correlations in experiments gains a reliable computational reference.
  • The absence of argument constraints allows direct use across the full range of nuclear states encountered in structure and reaction work.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Integration of the calculator into existing nuclear data analysis pipelines could reduce manual transcription errors when deriving alignment parameters.
  • The exact coupling-coefficient capability might serve as a verification benchmark for other angular-momentum libraries in broader quantum-mechanics codes.
  • Routine use could highlight cases where approximate alignment models deviate measurably from full tensor calculations.

Load-bearing premise

The program correctly implements the standard analytic expressions for the coefficients and tensors without numerical or algebraic errors.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of the program's output for a documented test case, such as the angular distribution coefficients for a specific spin sequence in an aligned nucleus, against independently tabulated reference values would reveal any implementation discrepancies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12681 by A.M. Hurst, D.A. Matters, M. Cromaz, T. Kawano.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Two-step γ-ray cascade. (b) Multi-step γ-ray cascade. non-observed γ ray, i.e., all γ rays other than γn,n+1 shown in Fig. 1b, such that W(θ) = X k=0,2,4 h Ak(Ji = Jn, Jf = Jn+1)Pk(cos θ) × JnY−1,Jn Jm,Jm+1 Uk(Ji = Jm, Jf = Jm+1) i . (16) Another important quantity that arises in the treatment of γ-ray angular distributions is the statistical tensor. Rose and Brink [7] define this tensor in terms of bo… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Magnetic substate populations P(mi) as a function of mi(J), shown for aligned (a) J = 2 ℏ and (b) J = 100 ℏ states. In each case, the Gaussian-width control parameter is varied from σ/J = 0.1, where the distributions approach maximal alignment with P(mi) concentrated on m = 0, to σ/J = 2.0, where the distributions approach an unoriented uniform distribution for all m). and is given by ρk(J) = √ 2J + 1 X J … view at source ↗
read the original abstract

A program has been developed to calculate a complete set of precise $\gamma$-ray angular distribution coefficients and statistical tensors in maximally- and partially-aligned nuclei. For practical nuclear structure and reaction purposes, there is no imposed constraint on any arguments that are likely to arise in the determination of these quantities. The program can also be used as a stand-alone vector-coupling calculator for the exact evaluation of Clebsch-Gordan and Racah coefficients, the closely-related Wigner 3-$j$, 6-$j$, and 9-$j$ symbols, as well as Gaunt coefficients. These quantities, which frequently arise in quantum mechanical applications involving angular momentum coupling and recoupling schemes, provide the underlying machinery in angular distribution calculations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the development of a program to calculate a complete set of precise γ-ray angular distribution coefficients and statistical tensors in maximally- and partially-aligned nuclei, with no constraints on physically relevant arguments. The program is also presented as a stand-alone vector-coupling calculator for exact evaluation of Clebsch-Gordan and Racah coefficients, Wigner 3-j, 6-j, and 9-j symbols, and Gaunt coefficients.

Significance. If the implementation is shown to be correct, the tool would offer practical utility for nuclear structure and reaction calculations by providing unconstrained, precise evaluations of standard angular-momentum coupling quantities that frequently arise in the field.

major comments (1)
  1. Abstract: The central claim asserts that a program has been developed which correctly computes the full set of coefficients, tensors, and underlying symbols. However, the manuscript supplies no code, no benchmark comparisons against tabulated values, no test-suite results, and no numerical examples or cross-checks of specific outputs. This leaves the correctness of the implementation unverified and the claim unsupported by evidence in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and the recommendation for major revision. The central issue identified is the absence of verification material supporting the correctness of the implementation. We will address this directly in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract: The central claim asserts that a program has been developed which correctly computes the full set of coefficients, tensors, and underlying symbols. However, the manuscript supplies no code, no benchmark comparisons against tabulated values, no test-suite results, and no numerical examples or cross-checks of specific outputs. This leaves the correctness of the implementation unverified and the claim unsupported by evidence in the text.

    Authors: We agree that the submitted manuscript does not contain explicit numerical examples, benchmark comparisons against tabulated values, or a description of a test suite. In the revised version we will add a new section that presents (i) direct comparisons of computed Clebsch-Gordan, Racah, and Wigner 3j/6j/9j symbols against standard tabulated values, (ii) sample calculations of statistical tensors and angular-distribution coefficients for representative aligned and partially aligned nuclear cases, and (iii) a link to the open-source code repository together with the test-suite inputs and outputs used for validation. These additions will provide the required evidence within the manuscript itself. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct implementation of externally defined standard expressions

full rationale

The manuscript presents a computational tool that evaluates known analytic expressions for γ-ray angular distribution coefficients, statistical tensors, and vector-coupling symbols (Clebsch-Gordan, Racah, Wigner 3j/6j/9j, Gaunt). No derivation chain is claimed; the work does not introduce new first-principles results, fitted parameters, or predictions that reduce to the program's own inputs. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz or renaming of empirical patterns occurs. The central claim (existence of a precise calculator) is independent of any internal reduction and rests on faithful reproduction of externally standard formulas.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The contribution is a computational implementation of existing quantum-mechanical formulas; no new free parameters, axioms, or entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard angular-momentum algebra and recoupling rules of quantum mechanics (Clebsch-Gordan, Racah, Wigner symbols) are correctly defined and tabulated in the literature.
    The program relies on these established identities to produce its numerical output.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5663 in / 1077 out tokens · 16706 ms · 2026-06-27T07:30:31.546375+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Bohr, Neutron Capture and Nuclear Constitution, Nature (London) 137 (1936) 344.doi:10.1038/137344a0

    N. Bohr, Neutron Capture and Nuclear Constitution, Nature (London) 137 (1936) 344.doi:10.1038/137344a0

    work page doi:10.1038/137344a0 1936

  2. [2]

    A. E. Litherland, A. J. Ferguson, Gamma-ray angular correlations from aligned nuclei produced by nuclear reactions, Can. J. Phys. 39 (1961) 788.doi:10.1139/p61-089

    work page doi:10.1139/p61-089 1961

  3. [3]

    Yamazaki, Tables of Coefficients for Angular Distribution of Gamma Rays from Aligned Nuclei, Nucl

    T. Yamazaki, Tables of Coefficients for Angular Distribution of Gamma Rays from Aligned Nuclei, Nucl. Data Sect. A 3 (1967) 1.doi:10.1016/ S0550-306X(67)80002-8. 32

    1967

  4. [4]

    Der Mateosian, A.W

    E. Der Mateosian, A.W. Sunyar, Tables of Attenuation Coefficients for Angular Distributions of Gamma Rays from Partially Aligned Nu- clei, At. Data and Nucl. Data Tables 13 (1974) 391.doi:10.1016/ 0092-640X(74)90007-2

    1974

  5. [5]

    L. C. Biedenharn, M. E. Rose, Theory of Angular Correlation of Nu- clear Radiations, Rev. Mod. Phys. 25 (1953) 729–777.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.25.729

    1953

  6. [6]

    D. R. Hamilton, On Directional Correlation of Successive Quanta, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940) 122–131.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.58.122

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.58.122 1940

  7. [7]

    Rose, D.M

    H.J. Rose, D.M. Brink, Angular Distributions of Gamma Rays in Terms of Phase-Defined Reduced Matrix Elements, Rev. Mod. Phys. 39 (1967) 306.doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.39.306

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.39.306 1967

  8. [8]

    K. S. Krane, R. M. Steffen, R. M. Wheeler, Directional correlations of gamma radiations emitted from nuclear states oriented by nuclear reactions or cryogenic methods, Nucl. Data Tables 11 (1973) 351–406. doi:10.1016/S0092-640X(73)80016-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0092-640x(73)80016-6 1973

  9. [9]

    Krane, Solid-angle correction factors for coaxial Ge(Li) detectors, Nucl

    K. Krane, Solid-angle correction factors for coaxial Ge(Li) detectors, Nucl. Instrum. Methods 98 (1972) 205.doi:10.1016/0029-554X(72) 90099-7

    work page doi:10.1016/0029-554x(72 1972

  10. [10]

    Hurst, SolidAngles,https://github.com/AaronMHurst/ SolidAngles, GitHub repository

    A.M. Hurst, SolidAngles,https://github.com/AaronMHurst/ SolidAngles, GitHub repository

  11. [11]

    Frauenfelder, Angular Correlation of Nuclear Radiation, Annu

    H. Frauenfelder, Angular Correlation of Nuclear Radiation, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 2 (1953) 129–162.doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.02.120153. 001021

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev.ns.02.120153 1953

  12. [12]

    J. J. Smith, et al., Gamma–gamma angular correlation analysis tech- niques with the GRIFFIN spectrometer, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 922 (2019) 47.doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.10.097

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2018.10.097 2019

  13. [13]

    Morse, et al., The polarization sensitivity of GRETINA, Nucl

    C. Morse, et al., The polarization sensitivity of GRETINA, Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 1025 (2022) 166155.doi:10.1016/ j.nima.2021.166155. 33

    arXiv 2022

  14. [14]

    U.Fano, DescriptionofStatesinQuantumMechanicsbyDensityMatrix and Operator Techniques, Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (1957) 74.doi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.29.74

    1957

  15. [15]

    Racah, Theory of Complex Spectra

    G. Racah, Theory of Complex Spectra. II, Phys. Rev. 62 (1942) 438. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.62.438

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.62.438 1942

  16. [16]

    Ali, et al., Exhibition of multiple band structures of different kind in 142Eu, Phys

    S. Ali, et al., Exhibition of multiple band structures of different kind in 142Eu, Phys. Rev. C 111 (2025) 024303.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.111. 024303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.111 2025

  17. [17]

    Deacon, et al., Single-particle and collective structures in 55Cr and 55V, Phys

    A.N. Deacon, et al., Single-particle and collective structures in 55Cr and 55V, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 064305.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.83. 064305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.83 2011

  18. [18]

    Steppenbeck, et al., Magnetic rotation and quasicollective structures in 58Fe: Influence of theνg9/2 orbital, Phys

    D. Steppenbeck, et al., Magnetic rotation and quasicollective structures in 58Fe: Influence of theνg9/2 orbital, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 044316. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.85.044316

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.85.044316 2012

  19. [19]

    Piiparinen, et al., High-spin spectroscopy of the 142Eu, 143Eu and 144Eu nuclei, Nucl

    M. Piiparinen, et al., High-spin spectroscopy of the 142Eu, 143Eu and 144Eu nuclei, Nucl. Phys. A 605 (1996) 191.doi:10.1016/ 0375-9474(96)00157-1

    1996

  20. [20]

    D.R.LaFosse, etal., Collectivestructuresandbandterminationin 107Sb, Phys. Rev. C 62 (2000) 014305.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.62.014305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.62.014305 2000

  21. [21]

    Chiara, et al., Spectroscopy in theZ= 49 108,110In isotopes: Life- time measurements in shears bands, Phys

    C.J. Chiara, et al., Spectroscopy in theZ= 49 108,110In isotopes: Life- time measurements in shears bands, Phys. Rev. C 64 (2001) 05314. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.64.054314

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.64.054314 2001

  22. [22]

    Zhu, et al., Level structure of the neutron-rich 56,58,60Cr isotopes: Single-particle and collective aspects, Phys

    S. Zhu, et al., Level structure of the neutron-rich 56,58,60Cr isotopes: Single-particle and collective aspects, Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 064315. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.064315

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.74.064315 2006

  23. [23]

    Steppenbeck, et al., High-spin structures in the neutron-rich isotopes 57−60Mn, Phys

    D. Steppenbeck, et al., High-spin structures in the neutron-rich isotopes 57−60Mn, Phys. Rev. C 81 (2010) 014305, Erratum: Phys. Rev. C82, 069903 (2010).doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.81.014305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.81.014305 2010

  24. [24]

    Smith, et al., Identification of excited states in119Ba, Phys

    J.F. Smith, et al., Identification of excited states in119Ba, Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000) 044329.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.61.044329. 34

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.61.044329 2000

  25. [25]

    Smith, et al., Identification of excited states in117Cs: Systematics of theν(h 11/2)2 alignment, Phys

    J.F. Smith, et al., Identification of excited states in117Cs: Systematics of theν(h 11/2)2 alignment, Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 024319.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevC.63.024319

    2001

  26. [26]

    Smith, et al., Excited states and deformation of112Xe, Phys

    J.F. Smith, et al., Excited states and deformation of112Xe, Phys. Lett. B 523 (2001) 13.doi:10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01339-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(01)01339-9 2001

  27. [27]

    Dusling, N

    J.F. Smith, et al., High-spin spectroscopy and quasiparticle alignments in 124,125Ce, Phys. Rev. C 69 (2004) 034339.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 69.034339

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc 2004

  28. [28]

    Smith, et al., Excited states and signature inversion in116Cs, Phys

    J.F. Smith, et al., Excited states and signature inversion in116Cs, Phys. Rev. C 74 (2006) 034310.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.74.034310

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.74.034310 2006

  29. [29]

    Paul, et al.,γ-ray spectroscopy of neutron-deficient110Te

    E.S. Paul, et al.,γ-ray spectroscopy of neutron-deficient110Te. I. Low- and intermediate-spin structures, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 034322.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.034322

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.034322 2007

  30. [30]

    Paul, et al.,γ-ray spectroscopy of neutron-deficient110Te

    E.S. Paul, et al.,γ-ray spectroscopy of neutron-deficient110Te. II. High- spin smooth-terminating structures, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 034323. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.76.034323

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.034323 2007

  31. [31]

    Deacon, et al., Yrast structures in the neutron-rich isotopes59,60Fe and the role of theg9/2 orbital, Phys

    A.N. Deacon, et al., Yrast structures in the neutron-rich isotopes59,60Fe and the role of theg9/2 orbital, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 054303.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.76.054303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.76.054303 2007

  32. [32]

    island of in- version

    A.N. Deacon, et al., Cross-shell excitations near the "island of in- version": Structure of 30Mg, Phys. Rev. C 82 (2010) 034305.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevC.82.034305

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.82.034305 2010

  33. [33]

    Smith, et al.,γ-ray spectroscopy of neutron-deficient123Ce, Phys

    J.F. Smith, et al.,γ-ray spectroscopy of neutron-deficient123Ce, Phys. Rev. C 86 (2012) 034303.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.86.034303

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.86.034303 2012

  34. [34]

    R. M. Diamond, E. Matthias, J. O. Newton, F. S. Stephens, Nuclear Alignment in Heavy-Ion Reactions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16 (1966) 1205. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.1205

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.16.1205 1966

  35. [35]

    J. O. Newton, F. S. Stephens, R. M. Diamond, K. K. Kotajima, E. Matthias, Angular Distributions of Gamma Rays Produced in Re- actions with Heavy Ions, Nucl. Phys. A 95 (1967) 357.doi:10.1016/ 0375-9474(67)90507-6. 35

    1967

  36. [36]

    Hurst, L.A

    A.M. Hurst, L.A. Bernstein, T. Kawano, A.M. Lewis, K. Song, The Baghdad Atlas: A relational database of inelastic neutron-scattering (n, n′γ)data, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 995 (2021) 165095.doi:10.1016/j.nima.2021.165095

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2021.165095 2021

  37. [37]

    L. Miriot-Jaubert, et al., First Study of the Pygmy Dipole Resonance via Neutron Inelastic Scattering at GANIL-SPIRAL2/NFS: Benchmarking the Method on the12C 2+ Excited State, Acta Phys. Pol. B 18 (2025) 2–A35.doi:10.5506/APhysPolBSupp.18.2-A35

    work page doi:10.5506/aphyspolbsupp.18.2-a35 2025

  38. [38]

    Lauritsen, et al.,γ-ray angular correlations, distributions and linear polarization in tracking arrays, Eur

    T. Lauritsen, et al.,γ-ray angular correlations, distributions and linear polarization in tracking arrays, Eur. Phys. J. A 61 (2025) 76.doi: 10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01533-5

    work page doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-025-01533-5 2025

  39. [39]

    Longfellow, et al., In-beam angular distribution and linear polariza- tion measurements with GRETINA using a simple energy-ordering ap- proach, Nucl

    B. Longfellow, et al., In-beam angular distribution and linear polariza- tion measurements with GRETINA using a simple energy-ordering ap- proach, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A 1082 (2026) 170932. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170932

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2025.170932 2026

  40. [40]

    Chalil, O

    A. Chalil, O. Litaize, T. Materna, A. Chebboubi, Quantification of spin alignment in fission by simultaneous treatment ofγand conver- sion electron angular distributions, Phys. Rev. C 109 (2024) 014605. doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.109.014605

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.109.014605 2024

  41. [41]

    Tamura, Angular Momentum Coupling Coefficients, Comp

    T. Tamura, Angular Momentum Coupling Coefficients, Comp. Phys. Comm. 1 (1970) 337, Program title: GEOMETRICAL COEFFICIENT; Catalogue number: ABMA; Erratum:Angular Momentum Coupling Coefficients(Correction Deck), Comp. Phys. Comm.2, 173–174 (1971). doi:10.1016/0010-4655(70)90034-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(70)90034-2 1970

  42. [42]

    Wills, On the evaluation of angular momentum coupling coeffi- cients, Comp.Phys.Comm.2(1971)381.doi:10.1016/0010-4655(71) 90030-0

    J.G. Wills, On the evaluation of angular momentum coupling coeffi- cients, Comp.Phys.Comm.2(1971)381.doi:10.1016/0010-4655(71) 90030-0

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(71 1971

  43. [43]

    Bretz, An improved method for calculation of angular momen- tum coupling coefficients, Acta Physica 40 (1976) 255.doi:10.1007/ BF03157502

    V. Bretz, An improved method for calculation of angular momen- tum coupling coefficients, Acta Physica 40 (1976) 255.doi:10.1007/ BF03157502

    1976

  44. [45]

    Stone, C.P

    A.J. Stone, C.P. Wood, Root-rational-fraction package for exact cal- culation of vector-coupling coefficients, Comp. Phys. Comm. 21 (1980) 195, Program title: Root Rational Fraction Package; Catalogue num- ber: ABVN;https://www-stone.ch.cam.ac.uk/wigner.shtml.doi: 10.1016/0010-4655(80)90040-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(80)90040-5 1980

  45. [46]

    Lai, Computation of Algebraic Formulas for Wigner 3-j, 6-j, and 9-jSymbols by Maple, Int

    S.-T. Lai, Computation of Algebraic Formulas for Wigner 3-j, 6-j, and 9-jSymbols by Maple, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 52 (1994) 593.doi: 10.1002/qua.560520303

    work page doi:10.1002/qua.560520303 1994

  46. [47]

    wolfram.com/mathematica, Champaign, IL (2025)

    Wolfram Research, Inc., Mathematica, Version 14.3,https://www. wolfram.com/mathematica, Champaign, IL (2025)

    2025

  47. [48]

    Stevenson, Analytic angular momentum coupling coefficient cal- culators, Comp

    P.D. Stevenson, Analytic angular momentum coupling coefficient cal- culators, Comp. Phys. Comm. 147 (2002) 853, Program title: Cleblet; Catalogue number: ADQG.doi:10.1016/S0010-4655(02)00462-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0010-4655(02)00462-9 2002

  48. [49]

    Stevenson, Clebsch-o-Matic,https://github.com/pdstevenson/ clebsch-o-matic, GitHub repository

    P.D. Stevenson, Clebsch-o-Matic,https://github.com/pdstevenson/ clebsch-o-matic, GitHub repository

  49. [50]

    Meurer, et al., SymPy: symbolic computing in Python, PeerJ Comp

    A. Meurer, et al., SymPy: symbolic computing in Python, PeerJ Comp. Sci. 3 (2017) e103.doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.103

    work page doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.103 2017

  50. [51]

    E. S. Macias, W. D. Ruhter, D. C. Camp, R. G. Lanier, A pro- gram for calculating gamma–gamma directional correlation coefficients and mixing ratios, Comp. Phys. Comm. 11 (1976) 75, Program ti- tle: ANGCOR; Catalogue number: ABPG.doi:https://doi.org/ 10.1016/0010-4655(76)90041-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(76)90041-2 1976

  51. [52]

    Rouse, G.L

    R.J. Rouse, G.L. Strubble, R.G. Lanier, L.G. Mann, A program for cal- culating gamma–gamma directional correlation coefficients and angular distribution coefficients for gamma rays of mixed multipolarities from partially aligned nuclei, Comp. Phys. Comm. 15 (1978) 107, Program ti- tle: THDST;Cataloguenumber: ABMZ.doi:10.1016/0010-4655(78) 90085-1. 37

    work page doi:10.1016/0010-4655(78 1978

  52. [53]

    Hurst, PyGammaRAD: Python project for Gamma-Ray An- gular Distributions,https://github.com/AaronMHurst/PyGammaRAD, GitHub repository

    A.M. Hurst, PyGammaRAD: Python project for Gamma-Ray An- gular Distributions,https://github.com/AaronMHurst/PyGammaRAD, GitHub repository

  53. [54]

    Hurst, PyGammaRAD: Python project for Gamma-Ray Angu- lar Distributions,https://pypi.org/project/PyGammaRAD/, Python Package Index (PyPI) repository

    A.M. Hurst, PyGammaRAD: Python project for Gamma-Ray Angu- lar Distributions,https://pypi.org/project/PyGammaRAD/, Python Package Index (PyPI) repository

  54. [55]

    Brink, G.R

    D.M. Brink, G.R. Satchler, Angular Momentum, 2nd Edition, Claren- don Press, Oxford, 1968

    1968

  55. [56]

    Devanathan, Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechan- ics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, Lon- don, Moscow, 2002

    V. Devanathan, Angular Momentum Techniques in Quantum Mechan- ics, Kluwer Academic Publishers, New York, Boston, Dordrecht, Lon- don, Moscow, 2002

    2002

  56. [57]

    Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1957

    A.R. Edmonds, Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1957

    1957

  57. [58]

    Rose, Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, London, 1957

    M.E. Rose, Elementary Theory of Angular Momentum, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, London, 1957

    1957

  58. [59]

    Wei, New formula for 9-jsymbols and their direct calculation, Com- put

    L. Wei, New formula for 9-jsymbols and their direct calculation, Com- put. Phys. 12 (1998) 632.doi:10.1063/1.168745

    work page doi:10.1063/1.168745 1998

  59. [60]

    Rasch, A.C.H

    J. Rasch, A.C.H. Yu, Efficient Storage Scheme for Precalculated Wigner 3j,6jand Gaunt Coefficients, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 25 (2003) 1416. doi:10.1137/S1064827503422932

    work page doi:10.1137/s1064827503422932 2003

  60. [61]

    Johansson, C

    H.T. Johansson, C. Forssén, Fast and Accurate Evaluation of Wigner 3j,6j, and9jSymbols Using Prime Factorization and Multiword Inte- ger Arithmetic, SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 38 (2016) A376.doi:10.1137/ 15M1021908

    2016

  61. [62]

    K. S. Krane,E2,M1multipole mixing ratios in even-even nuclei, A≥152, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 16 (1975) 383.doi:10.1016/ 0092-640X(75)90018-2

    1975

  62. [63]

    K. S. Krane, R. M. Steffen, Determination of theE2/M1Multipole MixingRatiosoftheGammaTransitionsin 110Cd, Phys.Rev.C2(1970) 724.doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.2.724. 38

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.2.724 1970

  63. [64]

    Alder, R

    K. Alder, R. M. Steffen, The Electromagnetic Interaction in Nuclear Spectroscopy, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1975

    1975

  64. [65]

    Krane, Tables of Coefficients for Analysis of Angular Distribution of Gamma Radiation from Oriented Nuclei, Tech

    K.S. Krane, Tables of Coefficients for Analysis of Angular Distribution of Gamma Radiation from Oriented Nuclei, Tech. Rep. LA-4677, Los Alamos National Laboratory (June 1971)

    1971

  65. [66]

    Yükcü, S

    S.A. Yükcü, S. Atalay, N. Yükcü, E. Öztekin, Calculation of the Gaunt coefficients over real spherical harmonics, Can. J. Phys. 103 (2025) 321. doi:10.1139/cjp-2024-0161

    work page doi:10.1139/cjp-2024-0161 2025

  66. [67]

    Ypma, Historical Development of the Newton-Raphson Method, SIAM Rev

    T.J. Ypma, Historical Development of the Newton-Raphson Method, SIAM Rev. 37 (1995) 531.doi:10.1137/1037125

    work page doi:10.1137/1037125 1995

  67. [68]

    Roothaan, A Study of Two-Center Integrals Useful in Calcu- lations on Molecular Structure

    C.C.J. Roothaan, A Study of Two-Center Integrals Useful in Calcu- lations on Molecular Structure. I, J. Chem. Phys. 19 (1951) 1445. doi:10.1063/1.1748100

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1748100 1951

  68. [69]

    Xu, Fast evaluation of the Gaunt eoefficients, Math

    Y.-L. Xu, Fast evaluation of the Gaunt eoefficients, Math. Comput. 65 (1996) 1601

    1996

  69. [70]

    Xu, Fast evaluation of the Gaunt eoefficients: recursive approach, J.Comput.Appl.Math.85(1997)53.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0377-0427(97)00128-3

    Y.-L. Xu, Fast evaluation of the Gaunt eoefficients: recursive approach, J.Comput.Appl.Math.85(1997)53.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0377-0427(97)00128-3

    1997

  70. [71]

    Condon, G.H

    E.U. Condon, G.H. Shortley, Theory of Atomic Spectra, Cambridge University Press, 1935

    1935

  71. [72]

    Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Vol

    A. Messiah, Quantum Mechanics, Vol. 2, Amsterdam, Netherlands: North-Holland, 1962

    1962

  72. [73]

    Shore, D.H

    B.W. Shore, D.H. Menzel, Principles of Atomic Spectra, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1968. 39

    1968