pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12750 · v1 · pith:JV4HFYYFnew · submitted 2026-06-10 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Intrinsic Ductility from Shear Amorphization: From Pure Metals to Multi-Principal-Element Alloys

Morgan R. Jones , Duane D. Johnson , Nicolas Argibay This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 08:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords intrinsic ductilityshear amorphizationactivation energy densityductile-to-brittle transitionmulti-principal-element alloyssolid solution alloysNb-Ta-V-Ti
0
0 comments X

The pith

Activation energy density for amorphization predicts intrinsic ductility in metals and alloys from pure elements to multi-principal systems.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that intrinsic ductility stems from a fracture criterion based on the activation energy density required for shear amorphization. This approach replaces reliance on crystal cleavage or dislocation nucleation at crack tips and uses ab-initio tabulated data on stiffness constants, lattice parameters, and binary interaction energies to derive predictions. It successfully forecasts both the intrinsic ductility and the ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures for pure metals and solid-solution alloys. The framework is validated through phase diagrams of the Nb-Ta-V-Ti system that match its known high strength and room-temperature tensile ductility.

Core claim

Rather than relying on crystal cleavage and dislocation nucleation at preexisting crack tips, the activation energy density for amorphization serves as a lower energy fracture criterion that enables accurate predictions of both intrinsic ductility and ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures. Analytical expressions combined with ab-initio data yield a unified theory reconciling ductile flow in pure metals and solid-solution alloys, with phase diagrams for the Nb-Ta-V-Ti system explaining its high strength and room-temperature tensile ductility.

What carries the argument

The activation energy density for amorphization, which acts as the controlling lower-energy fracture criterion at crack tips.

If this is right

  • Predictions of ductility can be made directly from tabulated ab-initio stiffness constants, lattice parameters, and binary interaction energies.
  • The same framework applies uniformly to pure metals and multi-principal-element alloys.
  • Phase diagrams can simultaneously account for strength and ductility in alloy systems like Nb-Ta-V-Ti.
  • The approach supports rapid computational design of new structural alloys.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reliance on binary interaction energies suggests the model could extend to complex alloys by approximating higher-order terms.
  • Experimental observation of amorphization at crack tips before cleavage in ductile samples would provide direct support.
  • Linking the criterion more explicitly to electronic band filling could refine predictions for specific elemental combinations.

Load-bearing premise

Activation energy density for amorphization is lower than the energy for crystal cleavage and dislocation nucleation at preexisting crack tips, making it the governing factor for intrinsic ductility.

What would settle it

Finding a ductile metal where the calculated activation energy density for amorphization exceeds the energy barriers for cleavage or dislocation nucleation at crack tips.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12750 by Duane D. Johnson, Morgan R. Jones, Nicolas Argibay.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Comparison of the activation energy for cleavage via crack propagation21 to the activation energy for generation of an amorphous interface43 , analogous to a high-energy grain boundary44, showing that the latter is the energetically preferred mechanism. (b) Interstitial charge density correlations to the activation stresses for amorphization (top panel) and slip (bottom panel), for both elements and al… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (a) Diagram showing the generalized stacking fault energy curve and its relationship to the activation energy densities of the two limiting barriers to slip. (b) Illustration of the preferred slip systems for cubic crystals and cross-sectional images showing DFT-based interstitial charge density distributions orthogonal to the preferred slip planes (which happens along the dotted green lines) for two proto… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A comparison of bond directionality (fbond) to interstitial charge density for FCC and BCC structures on their preferred slip systems. Note that basal HCP data are omitted as fbond = 1. An analysis of the relationship between charge density, ρo, and fbond is presented in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Relationships between (a) amorphization energy density and DFT bulk moduli 47 (T = 0 K) and DFT bulk moduli to effective interstitial charge density. The empirical relationship between amorphization energy density (bond strength) and bulk modulus, the latter from DFT 47 at T = 0 K, is shown in Figure 4a to be . The Thomas-Fermi prefactor 3895 GPa/(e- /Å 3 ) is exclusively geometrical in origin, but, again,… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: (a) Correlation between energy-density based activation stresses for slip and amorphization, (Eq. 1-2) and (Eq. 7), showing the regimes of intrinsic ductility or brittleness for elements; error bars correspond to the variability in DFT-based calculations of USFE57; (b) The relationship between dislocation-slip strength (Eq. 7) and intrinsic ductility (Eq. 13) for exemplar multi-principal-element alloys Nb-… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: (a) Analytically predicted slip-activation intrinsic strength, (b) intrinsic ductility, and (c) phase stability based on formation enthalpies from Chen et al. 46, using binary interaction energies from Chen et al.46, for Nb-Ta-V-Ti and W-Ti-V, where the pairing of Nb+Ta to enable pseudoternary plotting was selected based on similarly in band structure (similar d-band electron and high/low spin state fillin… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Experimental tensile yield strength data for high-purity polycrystalline tungsten at quasi￾static strain rates from multiple sources71–73, a shaded envelope showing the range of reported ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures (TDBT), and dashed lines corresponding to predicted DBT transition stresses, (Eq. 14), for the reported grain sizes and dislocation densities in annealed and cold-worked condi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Direct links between electronic structure and intrinsic ductility remain elusive for metals. A framework is proposed that reduces the complexities of valence charge distribution, band filling, and shear strain effects into structure-property relationships describing the intrinsic ductility of metals and alloys. Rather than relying on crystal cleavage and dislocation nucleation at preexisting crack tips, we show that a lower energy fracture criterion, i.e., the activation energy density for amorphization, enables accurate predictions of both intrinsic ductility and ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures. From analytical expressions and tabulated ab-initio stiffness constants, lattice parameters, and binary interaction energies, we present a unified theory that reconciles ductile flow in pure metals and solid-solution alloys. Phase diagrams generated for the Nb-Ta-V-Ti system simultaneously explain its high strength and room-temperature tensile ductility, validating this framework as a practical one for rapid design of structural multi-principal-element alloys.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a unified theoretical framework for intrinsic ductility and ductile-to-brittle transition temperatures in pure metals and multi-principal-element alloys. It asserts that the activation energy density for shear amorphization constitutes a lower-energy fracture criterion than crystal cleavage or dislocation nucleation at preexisting crack tips. Analytical expressions derived from tabulated ab-initio stiffness constants, lattice parameters, and binary interaction energies are used to generate predictions, with validation claimed via phase diagrams for the Nb-Ta-V-Ti system that account for its observed high strength and room-temperature tensile ductility.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the work would represent a meaningful advance by supplying an analytical, ab-initio-based route to ductility predictions that spans pure metals and complex solid-solution alloys, with direct utility for rapid MPEA design. The reliance on tabulated parameters rather than extensive new computations is a constructive feature that could facilitate broader application.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and fracture-criterion derivation] Abstract and the section deriving the fracture criterion: The manuscript states that amorphization activation energy density is a lower-energy criterion enabling the ductility predictions, yet does not furnish an explicit numerical comparison or inequality (E_amorph < min(E_cleavage, E_disloc)) evaluated at crack tips for the modeled systems. This demonstration is load-bearing for the claim that amorphization governs intrinsic ductility rather than serving as an alternative parameterization.
  2. [Nb-Ta-V-Ti validation] Validation section on Nb-Ta-V-Ti: The phase diagrams are presented as simultaneously explaining strength and ductility, but the text provides no tabulated quantitative metrics (e.g., predicted versus measured ductility values, DBTT errors, or R² statistics) that would allow independent assessment of the asserted accuracy of the predictions.
  3. [Methods / input parameters] Methods section on input parameters: Binary interaction energies are drawn from tabulated ab-initio sources; if any of these energies were fitted to mechanical-property data overlapping with the ductility or DBTT validation sets, the framework would contain a circularity that undermines the claim of a new governing criterion derived from first principles.
minor comments (1)
  1. All symbols appearing in the analytical expressions for activation energy density should be defined at first use, including any auxiliary quantities derived from stiffness constants and lattice parameters.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We respond to each major comment point by point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and fracture-criterion derivation] Abstract and the section deriving the fracture criterion: The manuscript states that amorphization activation energy density is a lower-energy criterion enabling the ductility predictions, yet does not furnish an explicit numerical comparison or inequality (E_amorph < min(E_cleavage, E_disloc)) evaluated at crack tips for the modeled systems. This demonstration is load-bearing for the claim that amorphization governs intrinsic ductility rather than serving as an alternative parameterization.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical comparison would strengthen the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection with tabulated values of E_amorph, E_cleavage and E_disloc evaluated at crack tips for representative pure metals and Nb-Ta-V-Ti compositions, confirming the inequality using the same ab-initio stiffness and interaction parameters already employed in the framework. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Nb-Ta-V-Ti validation] Validation section on Nb-Ta-V-Ti: The phase diagrams are presented as simultaneously explaining strength and ductility, but the text provides no tabulated quantitative metrics (e.g., predicted versus measured ductility values, DBTT errors, or R² statistics) that would allow independent assessment of the asserted accuracy of the predictions.

    Authors: We acknowledge the absence of quantitative metrics. The revised manuscript will include a new table listing predicted versus experimentally reported ductility indicators and DBTT values for the Nb-Ta-V-Ti alloys, together with mean absolute errors and any available correlation statistics to permit independent assessment. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Methods / input parameters] Methods section on input parameters: Binary interaction energies are drawn from tabulated ab-initio sources; if any of these energies were fitted to mechanical-property data overlapping with the ductility or DBTT validation sets, the framework would contain a circularity that undermines the claim of a new governing criterion derived from first principles.

    Authors: The binary interaction energies are taken exclusively from published ab-initio DFT studies of thermodynamic mixing enthalpies that predate and are independent of the mechanical-property validation sets used here. No fitting to ductility or DBTT data occurred, so the framework contains no circularity. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation uses independent tabulated ab-initio inputs

full rationale

The abstract presents analytical expressions derived from tabulated ab-initio stiffness constants, lattice parameters, and binary interaction energies as external inputs to generate predictions for ductility and DBTT. No equations or steps are shown that reduce the activation energy density for amorphization to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction. The claim that amorphization is a lower-energy criterion is presented as a derived result from those inputs rather than an assumption smuggled in via self-reference. This is a standard use of external computational data and does not trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework relies on ab-initio computed quantities and analytical reductions; specific free parameters are not enumerated in the abstract.

free parameters (1)
  • binary interaction energies
    Mentioned as input for analytical expressions in alloys, likely derived or fitted from data.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Shear amorphization activation energy density is the controlling fracture criterion for intrinsic ductility
    This is the core of the proposed lower energy fracture criterion.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5688 in / 1108 out tokens · 26663 ms · 2026-06-27T08:38:02.137044+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Hall, E. O. The Deformation and Ageing of Mild Steel: III Discussion of Results. Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. B 64, 747–753 (1951)

    1951

  2. [2]

    Petch, N. J. The Cleavage Strength of Polycrystals. J. Iron Steel Inst. 173, 25–28 (1953)

    1953

  3. [3]

    C., Knight, B

    Cordero, Z. C., Knight, B. E. & Schuh, C. A. Six decades of the Hall–Petch effect – a survey of grain-size strengthening studies on pure metals. Int. Mater. Rev. 61, 495–512 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Taylor, G. I. The mechanism of plastic deformation of crystals. Part I.—Theoretical. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 145, 362–387 (1934)

    1934

  5. [5]

    Taylor, G. I. The Mechanism of Plastic Deformation of Crystals. Part II. Comparison with Observations. Proc. R. Soc. Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 145, 388–404 (1934)

    1934

  6. [6]

    Zur Kristallplastizität

    Orowan, E. Zur Kristallplastizität. I. Z. Für Phys. 89, 605–613 (1934)

    1934

  7. [7]

    Fleischer, R. L. Solution hardening. Acta Metall. 9, 996–1000 (1961)

    1961

  8. [8]

    Fleischer, R. L. Substitutional solution hardening. Acta Metall. 11, 203–209 (1963)

    1963

  9. [9]

    Cottrell, A. H. & Bilby, B. A. Dislocation Theory of Yielding and Strain Ageing of Iron. Proc. Phys. Soc. Sect. A 62, 49 (1949)

    1949

  10. [10]

    A Statistical Theory of Solid Solution Hardening

    Labusch, R. A Statistical Theory of Solid Solution Hardening. Phys. Status Solidi B 41, 659– 669 (1970)

    1970

  11. [11]

    Statistische theorien der mischkristallhärtung

    Labusch, R. Statistische theorien der mischkristallhärtung. Acta Metall. 20, 917–927 (1972)

    1972

  12. [12]

    Mott, N. F. & Nabarro, F. R. N. An attempt to estimate the degree of precipitation hardening, with a simple model. Proc. Phys. Soc. 52, 86 (1940)

    1940

  13. [13]

    J., Kocks, U

    Bacon, D. J., Kocks, U. F. & Scattergood, R. O. The effect of dislocation self-interaction on the orowan stress. Philos. Mag. J. Theor. Exp. Appl. Phys. 28, 1241–1263 (1973)

    1973

  14. [14]

    Ashby, M. F. The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. Philos. Mag. J. Theor. Exp. Appl. Phys. 21, 399–424 (1970)

    1970

  15. [15]

    Chookajorn, T., Murdoch, H. A. & Schuh, C. A. Design of Stable Nanocrystalline Alloys. Science 337, 951–954 (2012)

    2012

  16. [16]

    Murdoch, H. A. & Schuh, C. A. Stability of binary nanocrystalline alloys against grain growth and phase separation. Acta Mater. 61, 2121–2132 (2013)

    2013

  17. [17]

    Pugh, S. F. XCII. Relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals. Lond. Edinb. Dublin Philos. Mag. J. Sci. 45, 823–843 (1954)

    1954

  18. [18]

    N., Greer, A

    Greaves, G. N., Greer, A. L., Lakes, R. S. & Rouxel, T. Poisson’s ratio and modern materials. Nat. Mater. 10, 823–837 (2011). 19

    2011

  19. [19]

    Pettifor, D. G. New many-body potential for the bond order. Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 2480–2483 (1989)

    1989

  20. [20]

    Pettifor, D. G. Theoretical predictions of structure and related properties of intermetallics. Mater. Sci. Technol. 8, 345–349 (1992)

    1992

  21. [21]

    Rice, J. R. Dislocation nucleation from a crack tip: An analysis based on the Peierls concept. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 40, 239–271 (1992)

    1992

  22. [22]

    Irwin, G. R. Analysis of stresses and strains near the end of a crack traversing a plate. J. Appl. Mech. 24, 361–364 (1957)

    1957

  23. [23]

    Griffith, A. A. VI. The phenomena of rupture and flow in solids. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. Contain. Pap. Math. Phys. Character 221, 163–198 (1921)

    1921

  24. [24]

    K., Varga, L

    Temesi, O. K., Varga, L. K., Chinh, N. Q. & Vitos, L. Ductility Index for Refractory High Entropy Alloys. Crystals 14, (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Singh, P. et al. A ductility metric for refractory-based multi-principal-element alloys. Acta Mater. 257, 119104 (2023)

    2023

  26. [26]

    & Chrzan, D

    Qi, L. & Chrzan, D. C. Tuning ideal tensile strengths and intrinsic ductility of bcc refractory alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 1–5 (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    Hu, Y .-J., Sundar, A., Ogata, S. & Qi, L. Screening of generalized stacking fault energies, surface energies and intrinsic ductile potency of refractory multicomponent alloys. Acta Mater. 210, 116800 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    M., Murty, B

    Shaikh, S. M., Murty, B. S. & Yadav, S. K. Designing a thermodynamically stable and intrinsically ductile refractory alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 939, 168597 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    & Gao, M

    Raghuraman, V ., Widom, M., San, S. & Gao, M. C. Ab initio tensile tests applied to bcc refractory alloys. Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 123601 (2023)

    2023

  30. [30]

    Borges, P. P. P. O., Ritchie, R. O. & Asta, M. Electronic descriptors for dislocation deformation behavior and intrinsic ductility in bcc high-entropy alloys. Sci. Adv. 10, eadp7670 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    & Aidhy, D

    Pant, D. & Aidhy, D. S. Electronic density of states as the descriptor of elastic bond strength, ductility, and local lattice distortion in BCC refractory alloys. Mater. Des. 253, 113885 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    P., Raabe, D

    George, E. P., Raabe, D. & Ritchie, R. O. High-entropy alloys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 4, 515–534 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Pollock, T. M. Alloy design for aircraft engines. Nat. Mater. 15, 809–815 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    Perepezko, J. H. The Hotter the Engine, the Better. Science 326, 1068–1069 (2009)

    2009

  35. [35]

    Cantor, B., Chang, I. T. H., Knight, P. & Vincent, A. J. B. Microstructural development in equiatomic multicomponent alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 375–377, 213–218 (2004)

    2004

  36. [36]

    Yeh, J. W. et al. Nanostructured high-entropy alloys with multiple principal elements: Novel alloy design concepts and outcomes. Adv. Eng. Mater. 6, 299-303+274 (2004)

    2004

  37. [37]

    Huang, H. et al. Achieving high tensile strength and ductility in refractory alloys by tuning electronic structure. Nat. Mater. 25, 386–394 (2026)

    2026

  38. [38]

    Gludovatz, B. et al. A fracture-resistant high-entropy alloy for cryogenic applications. Science 345, 1153–1158 (2014). 20

    2014

  39. [39]

    Liu, D. et al. Exceptional fracture toughness of CrCoNi-based medium- and high-entropy alloys at 20 kelvin. Science 378, 978–983 (2022)

    2022

  40. [40]

    Wang, F. et al. Multiplicity of dislocation pathways in a refractory multiprincipal element alloy. Science 370, 95–101 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    N., Wilks, G

    Senkov, O. N., Wilks, G. B., Miracle, D. B., Chuang, C. P. & Liaw, P. K. Refractory high- entropy alloys. 18, 1758–1765 (2010)

    2010

  42. [42]

    N., Miracle, D

    Senkov, O. N., Miracle, D. B., Chaput, K. J. & Couzinie, J. P. Development and exploration of refractory high entropy alloys - A review. J. Mater. Res. 33, 3092–3128 (2018)

    2018

  43. [43]

    Argibay, N. et al. An energetic link between order and strength in metals: A nanocrystalline strength limit in high-entropy alloys and intermetallic compounds. Acta Mater. 290, 120990 (2025)

    2025

  44. [44]

    & Argibay, N

    Chandross, M. & Argibay, N. Ultimate Strength of Metals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 125501 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    D., Singh, P., Smirnov, A

    Johnson, D. D., Singh, P., Smirnov, A. V . & Argibay, N. Universal Maximum Strength of Solid Metals and Alloys. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 166101 (2023)

    2023

  46. [46]

    Chen, W. et al. A map of single-phase high-entropy alloys. Nat. Commun. 14, 2856 (2023)

    2023

  47. [47]

    Shang, S. L. et al. First-principles calculations of pure elements: Equations of state and elastic stiffness constants. Comput. Mater. Sci. 48, 813–826 (2010)

    2010

  48. [48]

    Luo, H., Zhang, H., Sheng, H., Liu, J. P. & Szlufarska, I. Amorphous shear bands in SmCo5. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 785, (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Khrapak, S. A. Lindemann melting criterion in two dimensions. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 012040 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    L., Walls, H

    Hines, A. L., Walls, H. A. & Jethani, K. R. Determination of the coordination number of liquid metals near the melting point. Metall. Trans. A 16, 267–274 (1985)

    1985

  51. [51]

    The Structure of Liquid Transition Metals and Their Alloys

    Waseda, Y . The Structure of Liquid Transition Metals and Their Alloys . (Institute of Physics, United Kingdom, 1977)

    1977

  52. [52]

    & Yip, S

    Ogata, S., Li, J. & Yip, S. Ideal Pure Shear Strength of Aluminum and Copper. Science 298, 807–811 (2002)

    2002

  53. [53]

    & Yip, S

    Ogata, S., Li, J., Hirosaki, N., Shibutani, Y . & Yip, S. Ideal shear strain of metals and ceramics. Phys. Rev. B 70, 104104 (2004)

    2004

  54. [54]

    & Vitos, L

    Levämäki, H. & Vitos, L. Electron localization function implementation in the exact muffin- tin orbitals method. Phys. Rev. B 103, 035118 (2021)

    2021

  55. [55]

    & Fässler, T

    Savin, A., Nesper, R., Wengert, S. & Fässler, T. F. ELF: The Electron Localization Function. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 36, 1808–1832 (1997)

    1997

  56. [56]

    McAdon, M. H. & Goddard, W. A. New Concepts of Metallic Bonding Based on Valence- Bond Ideas. Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2563–2566 (1985)

    1985

  57. [57]

    Xu, S., Su, Y ., Smith, L. T. W. & Beyerlein, I. J. Frank-Read source operation in six body- centered cubic refractory metals. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 141, 104017 (2020)

    2020

  58. [58]

    Cook, D. H. et al. Kink bands promote exceptional fracture resistance in a NbTaTiHf refractory medium-entropy alloy. Science 384, 178–184 (2024). 21

    2024

  59. [59]

    N., Scott, J

    Senkov, O. N., Scott, J. M., Senkova, S. V ., Miracle, D. B. & Woodward, C. F. Microstructure and room temperature properties of a high-entropy TaNbHfZrTi alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 509, 6043–6048 (2011)

    2011

  60. [60]

    N., Wilks, G

    Senkov, O. N., Wilks, G. B., Scott, J. M. & Miracle, D. B. Mechanical properties of Nb25Mo25Ta 25W25 and V20Nb20Mo 20Ta20W20 refractory high entropy alloys. Intermetallics 19, 698–706 (2011)

    2011

  61. [61]

    Sheikh, S. et al. Alloy design for intrinsically ductile refractory high-entropy alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 120, 164902 (2016)

    2016

  62. [62]

    Yao, H. W. et al. NbTaV-(Ti,W) refractory high-entropy alloys: Experiments and modeling. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 674, 203–211 (2016)

    2016

  63. [63]

    Couzinié, J.-Ph. et al. On the room temperature deformation mechanisms of a TiZrHfNbTa refractory high-entropy alloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 645, 255–263 (2015)

    2015

  64. [64]

    Lilensten, L. et al. Study of a bcc multi-principal element alloy: Tensile and simple shear properties and underlying deformation mechanisms. Acta Mater. 142, 131–141 (2018)

    2018

  65. [65]

    Guduru, S. P. R., Kekung, M. O., Ott, R. T., Roy, S. & Singh, P. DuctGPT: A Generative Transformer for Forward Screening of Ductile Refractory Multi-Principal Element Alloys. Acta Mater. 304, 121763 (2026)

    2026

  66. [66]

    & Reiser, J

    Bonnekoh, C., Hoffmann, A. & Reiser, J. The brittle-to-ductile transition in cold rolled tungsten: On the decrease of the brittle-to-ductile transition by 600 K to − 65 °C. Int. J. Refract. Met. Hard Mater. 71, 181–189 (2018)

    2018

  67. [67]

    R., Boyce, B

    Weinberger, C. R., Boyce, B. L. & Battaile, C. C. Slip planes in bcc transition metals. Int. Mater. Rev. 58, 296–314 (2013)

    2013

  68. [68]

    C., Carroll, J

    Lim, H., Battaile, C. C., Carroll, J. D., Boyce, B. L. & Weinberger, C. R. A physically based model of temperature and strain rate dependent yield in BCC metals: Implementation into crystal plasticity. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 74, 80–96 (2014)

    2014

  69. [69]

    Holt, D. L. Dislocation Cell Formation in Metals. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 3197–3201 (1970)

    1970

  70. [70]

    & Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, P

    Galindo-Nava, E. & Rivera-Díaz-del-Castillo, P. Modelling plastic deformation in BCC metals: Dynamic recovery and cell formation effects. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 558, 641–648 (2012)

    2012

  71. [71]

    Raffo, P. L. Yielding and fracture in tungsten and tungsten-rhenium alloys. J. Common Met. 17, 133–149 (1969)

    1969

  72. [72]

    & Jaffee, R

    Schwartzberg, F., Ogden, H. & Jaffee, R. I. Ductile-Brittle Transition in the Refractory Metals. vol. 114 (Defense Metals Information Center, Battelle Memorial Institute, 1959)

    1959

  73. [73]

    Pugh, J. W. Tensile and creep properties of tungsten at elevated temperatures. in Proc. ASTM vol. 57 11 (1957)

    1957

  74. [74]

    S., Frick, C

    Schneider, A. S., Frick, C. P., Clark, B. G., Gruber, P. A. & Arzt, E. Influence of orientation on the size effect in bcc pillars with different critical temperatures. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 528, 1540–1547 (2011)

    2011

  75. [75]

    Blöchl, P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 50, 17953–17979 (1994)

    1994

  76. [76]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009). 22

    2009

  77. [77]

    Giannozzi, P. et al. Advanced capabilities for materials modelling with Quantum ESPRESSO. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 29, 465901 (2017)

    2017

  78. [78]

    P., Burke, K

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, K. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys Rev Lett 77, 3865–3868 (1996)

    1996

  79. [79]

    Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu

    Dal Corso, A. Pseudopotentials periodic table: From H to Pu. Comput. Mater. Sci. 95, 337– 350 (2014)

    2014

  80. [80]

    Monkhorst, H. J. & Pack, J. D. Special points for Brillouin-zone integrations. Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188–5192 (1976). 23

    1976