pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.12933 · v1 · pith:ECLJVVM4new · submitted 2026-06-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

A micromagnetic model with bidirectional magneto-thermal coupling

Peiru Yi , Zian Xia , Weichao Yu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 06:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords bidirectional couplingmagneto-thermalstochastic LLGheat transfer equationfirst law of thermodynamicsBoltzmann statisticsspin caloritronicsmicromagnetic model
0
0 comments X

The pith

Integrating the stochastic LLG equation with a generalized heat transfer equation creates a bidirectional magneto-thermal model that obeys the first law of thermodynamics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Conventional micromagnetic models treat thermal effects as one-way drivers of magnetization dynamics. This paper builds a closed system where magnetization damping and fluctuations in turn modify the local temperature. The model uses Ito calculus to show exact thermodynamic consistency and correct equilibrium behavior. Spatially resolved simulations demonstrate the energy feedback and its effects on temperature and density of states.

Core claim

We establish a rigorously self-consistent bidirectional magneto-thermal coupling model by integrating the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (sLLG) equation with a generalized heat transfer equation. In this closed-loop framework, the local temperature acts as a dynamical variable, and the damping-induced dissipation alongside stochastic work dynamically feeds back into the thermal bath as localized heat sources. Utilizing Ito stochastic calculus, we analytically prove that this coupled system strictly obeys the first law of thermodynamics and spontaneously recovers the correct Boltzmann statistics at equilibrium.

What carries the argument

The closed-loop integration of the sLLG equation and generalized heat transfer equation, with damping dissipation and stochastic work serving as heat sources to the thermal bath.

If this is right

  • The model captures finite-bath temperature reduction induced by spatial variation of magnetic moments.
  • It accounts for the modified density of states under exchange interactions.
  • The framework supports investigation of nonequilibrium dynamics such as the unidirectional spin-wave heat conveyer effect.
  • It provides a microscopic foundation for advanced spin-caloritronic applications.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could enable more accurate modeling of systems where magnetic processes significantly heat or cool local regions.
  • Extensions might include coupling to other transport equations for multi-physics simulations.
  • Similar bidirectional couplings could be tested in related stochastic models outside magnetism.

Load-bearing premise

The generalized heat transfer equation integrates directly with the sLLG equation such that damping dissipation and stochastic work fully account for all energy exchanges without additional missing terms.

What would settle it

Demonstration that the coupled equations violate energy conservation over time or fail to produce the Boltzmann distribution in long-time equilibrium simulations would disprove the consistency claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.12933 by Peiru Yi, Weichao Yu, Zian Xia.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the bidirectional magneto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time evolution of the heat bath temperature under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Verification of the Boltzmann statistical distribution using COMSOL Multiphysics. The 1D system consists of 200 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Equilibrium temperature variation of the finite heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Most conventional micromagnetic frameworks in spin caloritronics rely on a unidirectional coupling approximation, wherein thermal fluctuations drive magnetization dynamics while the feedback of magnetic dissipation onto the thermal reservoir is neglected. Here, we establish a rigorously self-consistent bidirectional magneto-thermal coupling model by integrating the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (sLLG) equation with a generalized heat transfer equation. In this closed-loop framework, the local temperature acts as a dynamical variable, and the damping-induced dissipation alongside stochastic work dynamically feeds back into the thermal bath as localized heat sources. Utilizing Ito stochastic calculus, we analytically prove that this coupled system strictly obeys the first law of thermodynamics and spontaneously recovers the correct Boltzmann statistics at equilibrium. Spatially resolved micromagnetic simulations further validate the energy exchange mechanism, capturing the finite-bath temperature reduction induced by spatial variation of magnetic moments and the modified density of states under exchange interactions. This bidirectional framework provides a robust microscopic foundation for investigating complex nonequilibrium magneto-thermal dynamics, such as the unidirectional spin-wave heat conveyer effect, paving the way for advanced spin-caloritronic applications.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a bidirectional magneto-thermal coupling model by integrating the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (sLLG) equation with a generalized heat transfer equation, treating local temperature as a dynamical variable sourced by damping dissipation and stochastic work. It claims an analytical proof via Ito stochastic calculus that the coupled system obeys the first law of thermodynamics exactly and recovers the Boltzmann distribution at equilibrium, with micromagnetic simulations validating energy exchange and finite-bath effects.

Significance. If the central analytical claim holds without gaps, the work supplies a thermodynamically consistent microscopic framework for spin caloritronics that removes the unidirectional approximation common in prior models. The explicit use of Ito calculus to derive first-law obedience and equilibrium statistics, together with simulation evidence for spatially resolved temperature reduction, would constitute a substantive advance for nonequilibrium magneto-thermal studies such as the spin-wave heat conveyer effect.

major comments (2)
  1. [Ito-calculus proof section] The Ito-calculus proof of first-law obedience (the section deriving dE_total via Ito's lemma on the coupled sLLG + heat equation): the derivation is performed under the assumption that the stochastic field remains delta-correlated white noise whose variance is set by the instantaneous local T(t). Once T becomes a dynamical variable, the effective noise acquires temporal correlations on the thermal relaxation timescale; the manuscript does not demonstrate that the required counter-terms are present to restore exact cancellation of the quadratic-variation contributions, leaving the claimed strict thermodynamic consistency unverified.
  2. [Equilibrium statistics recovery] Equilibrium statistics recovery claim: the proof that the coupled system spontaneously recovers the correct Boltzmann measure relies on the same white-noise Ito structure. With dynamical T the Fokker-Planck operator may acquire additional drift terms from the colored-noise spectrum; no explicit verification (analytic or numerical) is supplied that the stationary measure remains exactly exp(-E/kT) rather than a modified distribution.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is overly dense; the sentence describing the simulation validation mixes multiple distinct results (finite-bath reduction, modified density of states) without separating them.
  2. [Model definition] Notation for the generalized heat equation and the stochastic field correlation should be introduced with explicit time-dependence when T is dynamical, to avoid ambiguity with the fixed-T case.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing clarifications and indicating planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Ito-calculus proof section] The Ito-calculus proof of first-law obedience (the section deriving dE_total via Ito's lemma on the coupled sLLG + heat equation): the derivation is performed under the assumption that the stochastic field remains delta-correlated white noise whose variance is set by the instantaneous local T(t). Once T becomes a dynamical variable, the effective noise acquires temporal correlations on the thermal relaxation timescale; the manuscript does not demonstrate that the required counter-terms are present to restore exact cancellation of the quadratic-variation contributions, leaving the claimed strict thermodynamic consistency unverified.

    Authors: We acknowledge that treating T as dynamical raises the question of noise correlations. In our framework the stochastic field is defined to be white at each instant with variance fixed by the current local T(t), which is the standard modeling choice for such coupled magneto-thermal systems. The Ito lemma is applied directly to the total energy functional using this instantaneous white-noise structure, and the quadratic-variation terms from the sLLG equation are shown to cancel exactly against the heat-source term in the generalized heat equation by construction. We will revise the manuscript to add an explicit remark justifying the white-noise approximation and confirming that no further counter-terms arise within the adopted stochastic calculus. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Equilibrium statistics recovery] Equilibrium statistics recovery claim: the proof that the coupled system spontaneously recovers the correct Boltzmann measure relies on the same white-noise Ito structure. With dynamical T the Fokker-Planck operator may acquire additional drift terms from the colored-noise spectrum; no explicit verification (analytic or numerical) is supplied that the stationary measure remains exactly exp(-E/kT) rather than a modified distribution.

    Authors: The analytic proof proceeds by showing that, once the system reaches equilibrium (constant T), the Fokker-Planck operator reduces to the standard form whose unique stationary solution is the Boltzmann measure. We agree that an explicit demonstration for the fully dynamical-T case strengthens the claim. In the revised manuscript we will include additional long-time micromagnetic simulations that confirm the magnetization statistics converge to the expected Boltzmann distribution for several lattice sizes and exchange strengths. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: thermodynamic consistency derived analytically via Ito calculus on the coupled equations

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an analytical proof that the integrated sLLG + generalized heat equation system obeys the first law and recovers Boltzmann statistics, obtained by direct application of Ito stochastic calculus to the closed-loop dynamics. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and no ansatz or known result is smuggled in via definition. The derivation is presented as self-contained from the stochastic differential equations themselves, with no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction visible in the abstract or described model establishment.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract; the model rests on standard stochastic calculus and the assumption that the heat equation form captures all relevant dissipation feedback.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Ito stochastic calculus governs the coupled sLLG and heat equations
    Invoked to prove first-law compliance and Boltzmann recovery

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5721 in / 1166 out tokens · 17190 ms · 2026-06-27T06:14:05.814093+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

55 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ichi Uchida and T

    K. ichi Uchida and T. Hirai, Spin caloritronics: history and future prospects of experiments, Journal of Mag- netism and Magnetic Materials652, 174195 (2026)

    2026

  2. [2]

    G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, and B. J. van Wees, Spin caloritronics, Nature Materials11, 391 (2012)

    2012

  3. [3]

    H. Y. Yuan, Y. Wu, and O. Gomonay, Harnessing plas- monic heating for switching in antiferromagnets, Physical Review Letters136, 206702 (2026)

    2026

  4. [4]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon spintronics, Nature Physics11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  5. [5]

    Kikkawa and E

    T. Kikkawa and E. Saitoh, Spin seebeck effect: Sensitive probe for elementary excitation, spin correlation, trans- port, magnetic order, and domains in solids, Annual Re- view of Condensed Matter Physics14, 129 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    T. An, V. I. Vasyuchka, K. ichi Uchida, K. ichi Uchida, A. V. Chumak, K. Yamaguchi, K. Harii, J. ichiro Ohe, M. B. Jungfleisch, Y. Kajiwara, H. Adachi, B. Hille- brands, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Unidirectional spin- wave heat conveyer., Nature materials12 6, 549 (2013)

    2013

  7. [7]

    Adachi, K.-i

    H. Adachi, K.-i. Uchida, E. Saitoh, and S. Maekawa, The- ory of the spin seebeck effect, Reports on Progress in Physics76, 036501 (2013)

    2013

  8. [8]

    J. Xiao, G. E. W. Bauer, and A. Brataas, Spin-transfer torque in magnetic tunnel junctions: Scattering theory, Physical Review B77, 224419 (2008)

    2008

  9. [9]

    Xiao and G

    J. Xiao and G. E. W. Bauer, Spin-wave excitation in mag- netic insulators by spin-transfer torque, Physical Review Letters108, 217204 (2012)

    2012

  10. [10]

    Flipse, F

    J. Flipse, F. K. Bakker, A. Slachter, F. K. Dejene, and B. J. van Wees, The spin-dependent Peltier effect in metal-based spin valves, Nature Nanotechnology7, 166 (2012)

    2012

  11. [11]

    Brataas, Quantum scattering theory of spin transfer torque, spin pumping, and fluctuations, Physical Review B106, 064402 (2022)

    A. Brataas, Quantum scattering theory of spin transfer torque, spin pumping, and fluctuations, Physical Review B106, 064402 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Maekawa, T

    S. Maekawa, T. Kikkawa, H. Chudo, J. Ieda, and E. Saitoh, Spin and spin current – from fundamentals to recent progress, Journal of Applied Physics132, 140902 (2022)

    2022

  13. [13]

    Johnson and R

    M. Johnson and R. H. Silsbee, Thermodynamic analysis of interfacial transport and of the thermomagnetoelectric system, Phys. Rev. B35, 4959 (1987)

    1987

  14. [14]

    Hatami, G

    M. Hatami, G. E. W. Bauer, Q. Zhang, and P. J. Kelly, Thermal spin-transfer torque in magnetoelectronic de- vices, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 066603 (2007)

    2007

  15. [15]

    Uchida, S

    K. Uchida, S. Takahashi, K. Harii, J. Ieda, W. Koshibae, K. Ando, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Observation of the spin seebeck effect, Nature455, 778 (2008)

    2008

  16. [16]

    Atxitia, P

    U. Atxitia, P. Nieves, and O. Chubykalo-Fesenko, Landau-lifshitz-bloch equation for ferrimagnetic materi- als, Phys. Rev. B86, 104414 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    A. L. Soenjaya, Mixed finite element methods for the landau–lifshitz–baryakhtar and the regularised landau– lifshitz–bloch equations in micromagnetics, Journal of Scientific Computing103, 10.1007/s10915-025-02868-3 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1007/s10915-025-02868-3 2025

  18. [18]

    Tzoufras and M

    M. Tzoufras and M. K. Grobis, Dynamics of single- domain magnetic particles at elevated temperatures, New Journal of Physics17, 103014 (2015)

    2015

  19. [19]

    L. Hong, C. Xu, and H. Xiang, Evaluating gilbert damp- ing in magnetic insulators from first principles, Physical Review B109, 094429 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Zhang and J

    L. Zhang and J. Wang, Unified framework of the mi- croscopic landau–lifshitz–gilbert equation and its appli- cation to skyrmion dynamics, Physical Review B108, 144409 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Vansteenkiste, J

    A. Vansteenkiste, J. Leliaert, M. Dvornik, M. Helsen, F. Garcia-Sanchez, and B. Van Waeyenberge, The design and verification of MuMax3, AIP Advances4, 107133 (2014)

    2014

  22. [22]

    M. J. Donahue and D. G. Porter,OOMMF User’s Guide, Version 1.0, Tech. Rep. NISTIR 6376 (National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, 1999)

    1999

  23. [23]

    Scholz, magpar: A parallel finite-element micromag- netics package, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials258-259, 488 (2003)

    W. Scholz, magpar: A parallel finite-element micromag- netics package, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Ma- terials258-259, 488 (2003)

    2003

  24. [24]

    Fischbacher, M

    T. Fischbacher, M. Franchin, G. Bordignon, and H. Fan- gohr, A systematic approach to multiphysics exten- sions of finite-element-based micromagnetic simulations: Nmag, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics43, 2896 (2007)

    2007

  25. [25]

    Chang, S

    R. Chang, S. Li, M. V. Lubarda, B. Livshitz, and V. Lo- makin, FastMag: Fast micromagnetic simulator for com- plex magnetic structures (invited), Journal of Applied Physics109, 07D358 (2011)

    2011

  26. [26]

    Lepadatu, Boris computational spintronics — High performance multi-mesh magnetic and spin transport modelling software, Journal of Applied Physics128, 093902 (2020)

    S. Lepadatu, Boris computational spintronics — High performance multi-mesh magnetic and spin transport modelling software, Journal of Applied Physics128, 093902 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    Zhang, W

    J. Zhang, W. Yu, X. Chen, and J. Xiao, A frequency- domain micromagnetic simulation module based on COMSOL Multiphysics, AIP Advances13, 055108 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    M. Xu, C. Hua, Y. Chen, and W. Yu, Frequency modu- lation on magnons in synthetic dimensions, Nature Com- munications16, 3356 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    C. Hua, K. Wu, and W. Yu, Micromagnetic simulation tools: OOMMF, Mumax3, and COMSOL Multiphysics, inMagnetic Nanoparticles in Nanomedicine, edited by K. Wu and J.-P. Wang (Elsevier, 2024) Chap. 2, p. , iSBN: 978-0-443-21668-8

    2024

  30. [30]

    C. Wang, C. Hua, and W. Yu, Effective spin-spin cou- pling in magnon-polarons toward acoustic-assisted prob- ing of magnetic domains, Science China Physics, Mechan- ics & Astronomy69, 247512 (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    Widom, C

    A. Widom, C. Vittoria, and S. D. Yoon, Gilbert ferro- magnetic damping theory and the fluctuation-dissipation theorem, Journal of Applied Physics108, 073924 (2010). 8

    2010

  32. [32]

    ITO, On a stochastic integral equation, Proceedings of the Japan Academy22, 32 (1946)

    K. ITO, On a stochastic integral equation, Proceedings of the Japan Academy22, 32 (1946)

    1946

  33. [33]

    D. V. Berkov, Fast switching of magnetic nanoparticles: Simulation of thermal noise effects using the langevin dynamics, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics38, 2489 (2002)

    2002

  34. [34]

    Levati, M

    V. Levati, M. Vitali, A. Del Giacco,et al., Three- dimensional nanoscale control of magnetism in crys- talline yttrium iron garnet, Nature Communications 10.1038/s41467-025-64630-5 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-64630-5 2025

  35. [35]

    Y. Y. Kim, Thermal Conductivity of a Nanoscale Yt- trium Iron Garnet Thin-Film Prepared by the Sol-Gel Process, Nanomaterials7, 247 (2017)

    2017

  36. [36]

    W. F. Brown, Thermal Fluctuations of a Single-Domain Particle, Physical Review130, 1677 (1963)

    1963

  37. [37]

    C. W. Gardiner,Stochastic Methods: A Handbook for the Natural and Social Sciences, 4th ed. (Springer, 2009)

    2009

  38. [38]

    COMSOL Multiphysics®v. 6.4. www.comsol.com. COMSOL AB, Stockholm, Sweden

  39. [39]

    J. Rogel-Salazar, Econophysics and companies: Sta- tistical life and death in complex business networks, by hideaki aoyama, yoshi fijiwara, yuichi ikeda, hirishi iyetomi and wataru souma, Contemporary Physics52, 605 (2011)

    2011

  40. [40]

    Kainuma, R

    Y. Kainuma, R. Iguchi, D. Prananto, V. I. Vasyuchka, B. Hillebrands, T. An, and K.-i. Uchida, Local heat emis- sion due to unidirectional spin-wave heat conveyer effect observed by lock-in thermography, Applied Physics Let- ters118, 222404 (2021)

    2021

  41. [41]

    Science China Press, High-precision infrared imaging technology reveals the magnetic domain structure of non- collinear antiferromagnets, Science China Press (News Release) (2024), a news report summarizing the work published in National Science Review (Wang et al. 2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    Alasli, R

    A. Alasli, R. Iguchi, K.-i. Uchida, H. Nagano, and D. Hou, Measurements of in-plane thermophysical prop- erties on nanoscale-thick films by lock-in thermography, Applied Physics Letters126, 044102 (2025)

    2025

  43. [43]

    P. Wang, W. Xia, J. Shen, Y. Chen, W. Peng, J. Zhang, H. Pan, X. Yu, Z. Liu, Y. Gao, Q. Niu, Z. Xu, H. Yang, Y. Guo, and D. Hou, Infrared imaging of magnetic oc- tupole domains in non-collinear antiferromagnets, Na- tional Science Review11, nwad308 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    Adachi and S

    H. Adachi and S. Maekawa, Theory of unidirectional spin heat conveyer, Journal of Applied Physics117, 17C710 (2015)

    2015

  45. [45]

    Uchida, J

    K. Uchida, J. Xiao, H. Adachi, J. Ohe, S. Takahashi, J. Ieda, T. Ota, Y. Kajiwara, H. Umezawa, H. Kawai, G. E. W. Bauer, S. Maekawa, and E. Saitoh, Spin seebeck insulator, Nature Materials9, 894 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    Xuet al., Enhancing spin pumping by nonlocal manip- ulation of magnon temperature, Matter7, 4332 (2024)

    Z. Xuet al., Enhancing spin pumping by nonlocal manip- ulation of magnon temperature, Matter7, 4332 (2024)

    2024

  47. [47]

    Takahagi, T

    A. Takahagi, T. Hirai, A. Alasli, S. J. Park, H. Nagano, and K.-i. Uchida, Observation of the transverse thom- son effect, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-025-02936-3 (2025)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-025-02936-3 2025

  48. [48]

    ichi UCHIDA, Transport phenomena in spin caloritronics, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B97, 69 (2021)

    K. ichi UCHIDA, Transport phenomena in spin caloritronics, Proceedings of the Japan Academy, Series B97, 69 (2021)

    2021

  49. [49]

    Shigematsu, Y

    E. Shigematsu, Y. Ando, S. Dushenko, T. Shinjo, and M. Shiraishi, Spin-wave-induced lateral temperature gra- dient in a yig thin film/ggg system excited in an esr cav- ity, Applied Physics Letters113, 183505 (2018)

    2018

  50. [50]

    Hirai, T

    T. Hirai, T. Morita, S. Biswas, J. Uzuhashi, T. Yagi, Y. Yamashita, V. K. Kushwaha, F. Makino, R. Modak, Y. Sakuraba, T. Ohkubo, R. Guo, B. Xu, J. Shiomi, D. Chiba, and K. ichi Uchida, Non-equilibrium magnon engineering enabling significant thermal transport mod- ulation, Advanced Functional Materials35, 2506554 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    O. Wid, J. Bauer, A. M¨ uller, O. Breitenstein, S. S. P. Parkin, and G. Schmidt, Investigation of the unidirec- tional spin heat conveyer effect in a 200 nm thin yttrium iron garnet film, Scientific Reports6, 28233 (2016)

    2016

  52. [52]

    Schlitz, V

    R. Schlitz, V. E. Demidov, M. Lammel, S. O. Demokri- tov, and P. Gambardella, Auto-oscillations and direc- tional magnon emission induced by spin current injec- tion into large magnetic volumes, Nature Communica- tions16, 8472 (2025). Appendix A: Appendix

    2025

  53. [53]

    (Hy +H xαcosθ) cosϕ−H zαsinθ + (−Hx +H yαcosθ) sinϕ dt + √ T ακ −αsinθ dW z + (αcosθcosϕ−sinϕ)dW x + (cosϕ+αcosθsinϕ)dW y # , (A2) 9 dϕ= γ 1 +α 2

    Projection of the sLLG Equation into Spherical Coordinates To facilitate numerical integration and energy tracking, it is highly advantageous to project the sLLG equation from the Cartesian basis onto the local spherical coordi- nate basis. Let the normalized magnetization vector be parameterized asm= (sinθcosϕ,sinθsinϕ,cosθ) T . Us- ing the mathematicall...

  54. [54]

    For computational reproducibility, it is necessary to expand this abstract matrix operation into explicit scalar partial derivatives

    Explicit Expansion of the Itˆ o Energy Correction In the main text, the noise-induced energy drift is com- pactly expressed using the trace of the Hessian matrix: 1 2Tr(BT HEB)dt. For computational reproducibility, it is necessary to expand this abstract matrix operation into explicit scalar partial derivatives. Let the magnetic energy beE(θ, ϕ). Accordin...

  55. [55]

    Choosing the local polar axis (θ= 0) to align with the effective field direction, the magnetic energy isE=µ 0Ms∆V Heff(1− cosθ)

    Derivation of the Density of States with Exchange Interaction To analytically verify the Boltzmann distribution, the density of statesg(E) must be evaluated. Choosing the local polar axis (θ= 0) to align with the effective field direction, the magnetic energy isE=µ 0Ms∆V Heff(1− cosθ). The density of states is defined via the Dirac delta function over the...