pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13512 · v1 · pith:62ESL6T6new · submitted 2026-06-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con · physics.acc-ph

Current patterns and loss contributions in CORT cables carrying AC current

Beno\^it Vanderheyden , Julien Dular , Louis Denis , Steffen Elschner , Christophe Geuzaine , Mariusz Wozniak , Francesco Grilli This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con physics.acc-ph
keywords CORT cablecoated conductorAC lossGarber current patternhelical geometrysurface lossedge losssuperconducting cable
0
0 comments X

The pith

Helical geometry in CORT cables generates the Garber current pattern that determines how surface and edge losses add to total AC losses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates the non-uniform current distribution inside the coated conductors of a single-layer CORT cable that arises from the helical winding. This distribution, called the Garber current pattern, has current flowing mainly along the length on the outer surface and around the circumference on the inner surface. Using an effective two-dimensional model in coordinates that follow the helix, the authors calculate how this pattern changes with conductor thickness, pitch angle, and spacing. They link the pattern directly to the two dominant loss mechanisms: surface losses from the parallel magnetic field and edge losses from the perpendicular field at the gaps. A reader would care because these cables aim to carry AC power efficiently in compact form, and ignoring the pattern leads to incorrect loss estimates.

Core claim

For a one-layer CORT cable the helical arrangement of the coated conductors produces the Garber current pattern in which current is predominantly axial on the outer face and azimuthal on the inner face of each conductor. An effective 2D model based on helical coordinates reproduces the resulting three-dimensional current and field distributions. This pattern modulates the surface losses associated with parallel-field penetration into the superconducting layers and the edge losses associated with perpendicular-field penetration near the gaps between conductors. The relative size of these contributions varies systematically with conductor thickness, pitch angle, and gap size.

What carries the argument

Effective 2D helical coordinate model that conforms to the cable structure and computes the detailed current flow and loss contributions from the Garber pattern.

If this is right

  • The Garber pattern must be included in loss calculations rather than using straight-conductor simplifications.
  • Surface losses and edge losses respond differently to changes in pitch angle and gap width.
  • Optimal cable design requires balancing the geometrical parameters to minimize the sum of both loss types.
  • Thicker conductors alter current penetration and therefore change the magnitude of each loss mechanism.
  • The model provides a practical way to predict how loss shares shift with cable geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar helical effects may appear in other wound superconducting devices and could be analyzed with the same coordinate approach.
  • Direct experimental mapping of current on inner and outer faces of the conductors would test the model's predictions.
  • Extending the model to multi-layer cables could reveal how interlayer coupling modifies the Garber pattern.
  • Neglecting the pattern in existing designs may have led to underestimated AC losses in prototype CORT cables.

Load-bearing premise

The effective 2D helical coordinate model reproduces the full three-dimensional current and magnetic field distributions without systematic errors introduced by the coordinate transformation or neglected end effects.

What would settle it

Measuring the local current direction or magnetic field components on the inner versus outer faces of a coated conductor in an operating one-layer CORT cable and comparing the results to the model's predictions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13512 by Beno\^it Vanderheyden, Christophe Geuzaine, Francesco Grilli, Julien Dular, Louis Denis, Mariusz Wozniak, Steffen Elschner.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Application of Ampere’s law to a CORT cable with three CCs with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Geometry of the single-layer CORT cable and parameter definition. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Various definitions for representing the current distribution in the CC. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Current density in one half of a CC for the reference geometry with a gap of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Current density components along a radial path within the transition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Current density along an azimuthal path near the middle of the CC. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Current density in one half of a CC for the reference geometry with a gap of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Comparison of the radial component Jr along an azimuthal path near the middle of the CC for the reference geometry with a gap of 100 µm, for n = 25 and n = 101. The selected path is along row #11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Current distribution for a gap of 125 nm and n = 25. Close-up near the symmetry plane. superconductor. In addition to confirming the expected scaling behavior at small and large gaps, these results highlight the importance of having a numerical model able to simulate the superconductor with its real thickness. Practical CC gaps are in the range between 0.1 and 1 mm [1], [17], where no scaling rules can be… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: AC losses as a function of the gap for a fixed radius and a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: AC losses as a function of the pitch angle, for a constant gap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Geometry and boundary conditions of the helicoidal model in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Conductor-on-round-tube (CORT) cables are a potential solution for carrying AC power in a small cross-section. Due to the geometry of the cable and the helical arrangement of the coated conductors (CC), the current follows a non-trivial pattern inside each CC. For instance, for the case of a single-layer cable, the current flow is mostly axial along the outer face of the CCs and mostly azimuthal along their inner face. Such a current distribution, known as the Garber current pattern, affects the transport AC losses. In numerical models, commonly adopted simplifications are either based on straight conductors or infinitely thin CCs. Such approaches neglect the Garber current pattern and thus misrepresent both the detailed current flow within the CC and the resulting 3D distribution of the fields. In this work, the detailed 3D current distribution in the CCs is investigated in a one-layer CORT cable, as a function of the cable geometrical parameters such as the conductor thickness, the pitch angle, and the gap between adjacent CCs. In particular, the impact of the Garber current pattern is studied on the two largest contributions to the AC losses, namely the surface losses (associated with the penetration of the component of the magnetic field parallel to the wide faces of the superconducting layer) and the edge losses (associated with the penetration of the perpendicular component of the magnetic field occurring in the vicinity of the gaps between the CCs). The detailed distribution of the currents in the CCs is examined and its relationship with the different AC loss mechanisms is established. This study is carried out by means of an effective 2D model that uses a system of coordinates conforming with the helical structure of the cable.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that an effective 2D model employing helical-conforming coordinates can be used to compute the detailed 3D current distribution inside the coated conductors of a one-layer CORT cable. It examines how the Garber current pattern (axial on the outer face, azimuthal on the inner face) varies with conductor thickness, pitch angle, and inter-conductor gap, and quantifies the resulting effects on the two dominant AC-loss channels: surface losses driven by the parallel field component and edge losses driven by the perpendicular field near the gaps.

Significance. If the effective 2D model is shown to reproduce the full 3D current and field distributions to acceptable accuracy, the work would supply a practical computational route for relating cable geometry to the dominant loss mechanisms and could guide geometric optimization of CORT cables for reduced AC losses.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the effective 2D helical model faithfully reproduces the Garber current pattern and the associated surface/edge loss contributions rests on an unvalidated premise. No comparison to full 3D simulations, no error metrics, and no experimental benchmarks are referenced, yet the reported parametric relationships between thickness, pitch, gap and the two loss channels are derived directly from this model.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. Below we provide a point-by-point response to the major comment.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the effective 2D helical model faithfully reproduces the Garber current pattern and the associated surface/edge loss contributions rests on an unvalidated premise. No comparison to full 3D simulations, no error metrics, and no experimental benchmarks are referenced, yet the reported parametric relationships between thickness, pitch, gap and the two loss channels are derived directly from this model.

    Authors: The effective 2D model employs helical-conforming coordinates that exactly match the helical symmetry of the one-layer CORT cable. Under this symmetry the current and field distributions are invariant along the helical path, permitting an exact reduction of the 3D problem to a 2D problem with no approximation. The Garber pattern and the resulting surface/edge loss channels are therefore reproduced by construction; a separate full-3D simulation would be mathematically redundant. Error metrics between equivalent formulations are not required. The study is numerical and the scope does not include experimental benchmarks, which could be pursued separately. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: numerical study applies standard helical-coordinate model without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The paper describes a numerical investigation of current distributions and AC losses in a one-layer CORT cable using an effective 2D model with helical-conforming coordinates. No equations, fitted parameters, or derivations are presented that reduce any claimed prediction or result to the inputs by construction. The Garber current pattern and loss contributions are examined parametrically as functions of thickness, pitch angle, and gap; the model itself is invoked as a computational tool based on electromagnetic principles rather than being defined in terms of the target outputs. No self-citations are load-bearing for uniqueness theorems or ansatzes, and the abstract provides no evidence of renaming known results or smuggling assumptions via prior work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The effective 2D model implicitly assumes standard Maxwell equations plus a helical coordinate transformation whose validity is not demonstrated here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5869 in / 1195 out tokens · 21639 ms · 2026-06-27T05:12:17.256960+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Status of corc® cables and wires for use in high-field magnets and power systems a decade after their introduction,

    D. C. van der Laan, J. D. Weiss, and D. M. McRae, “Status of corc® cables and wires for use in high-field magnets and power systems a decade after their introduction,”Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 32, no. 3, p. 033001, feb 2019. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/aafc82

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/aafc82 2019

  2. [2]

    Calculation and measurement of transport AC loss of ReBCO CORC cables for electric aircraft,

    S. Otten, D. Ga ˇcnik, S. Br ¨uggenwirth, J. Leferink, M. Dhall ´e, H. H. J. ten Kate, S. A. D ¨onges, J. D. Weiss, K. Radcliff, D. C. van der Laan, J.- F. Rouquette, J. Rivenc, and E. Nilsson, “Calculation and measurement of transport AC loss of ReBCO CORC cables for electric aircraft,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 4703605,

  3. [3]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2024.3364120

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2024.3364120

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2024.3364120 2024

  4. [4]

    AmpaCity— Advanced superconducting medium voltage system for urban area power supply,

    M. Stemmle, F. Merschel, M. Noe, and A. Hobl, “AmpaCity— Advanced superconducting medium voltage system for urban area power supply,”Proceedings of the IEEE PES TD Conf. Expo, pp. 1–5,

  5. [5]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC.2014.6863566

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TDC.2014.6863566

    work page doi:10.1109/tdc.2014.6863566 2014

  6. [6]

    Development of the Superlink HTS Cable System for Implementation in Munich,

    D. Will ´en, M. Sed ´en, M. Pitzer, V . Roudriges-Zermeno, C. Thidemann, J. Kunert, D. D. Tjahjanto, C. Frohne, O. Holte, C. Wolff, W. Prusseit, C. Hintze, R. Bach, P. Mansheim, W. T. B. de Sousa, M. Noe, A. Alekseev, P. Michalek, and R. Prinz, “Development of the Superlink HTS Cable System for Implementation in Munich,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superc...

    arXiv 2025

  7. [7]

    J. D. Weiss, D. C. van der Laan, D. Hazelton, A. Knoll, G. Carota, D. Abraimov, A. Francis, M. A. Small, G. Bradford, and J. Jaroszynski, “Introduction of the next generation of CORC ® wires with engineering current density exceeding650A/mm 2 at12T based on SuperPower’s ReBCO tapes containing substrates of25µm thickness,” Superconductor Science and Techno...

  8. [8]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ab72c6

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6668/ab72c6

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6668/ab72c6

  9. [9]

    New Experimental Method for Investigating AC-losses in Concentric HTS Power Cables,

    S. Elschner, E. Demencik, B. Douine, F. Grilli, A. Kudymow, M. Stemmle, S. Strauss, V . Zermeno, and W. Goldacker, “New Experimental Method for Investigating AC-losses in Concentric HTS Power Cables,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 25, no. 3, p. 5900105, 2015. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2014.2366373

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2014.2366373 2015

  10. [10]

    An analysis of the transport losses measured on HTSC single-phase conductor prototypes,

    G. Vellego and P. Metra, “An analysis of the transport losses measured on HTSC single-phase conductor prototypes,”Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 8, pp. 476–483, 1995. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-2048/8/6/014

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-2048/8/6/014 1995

  11. [11]

    Field distributions in curved superconducting tapes conforming to a cylinder carrying transport currents,

    Y . Mawatari, “Field distributions in curved superconducting tapes conforming to a cylinder carrying transport currents,”Physical Review B, vol. 80, p. 184508, 2009. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.184508

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.80.184508 2009

  12. [12]

    Design of double helix conductors for superconducting AC power transmission,

    M. Garber, J. F. Bussiere, and G. H. Morgan, “Design of double helix conductors for superconducting AC power transmission,”MAGNETISM AND MAGNETIC MATERIALS — 1976: Proceedings of the First Joint MMM-Intermag Conference, vol. 34, pp. 84–87, 1976. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2946170

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2946170 1976

  13. [13]

    Theory of AC loss in power transmission cables with second generation high temperature superconductor wires,

    J. R. Clem and A. P. Malozemoff, “Theory of AC loss in power transmission cables with second generation high temperature superconductor wires,”Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 23, p. 034014, 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0953-2048/23/3/034014

    2010

  14. [14]

    The Garber Current Pattern: An Additional Contribution to AC Losses in Helical HTS Cables?

    S. Elschner, A. Kudymow, N. Riva, and F. Grilli, “The Garber Current Pattern: An Additional Contribution to AC Losses in Helical HTS Cables?”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 34, no. 3, p. 5902205, 2024. [Online]. Available: https: //doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2024.3356435

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2024.3356435 2024

  15. [15]

    Helicoidal Transformation Method for Finite Element Models of Twisted Superconductors,

    J. Dular, F. Henrotte, A. Nicolet, M. Wozniak, B. Vanderheyden, and C. Geuzaine, “Helicoidal Transformation Method for Finite Element Models of Twisted Superconductors,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 34, no. 7, p. 8200615, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/TASC.2024.3416524

    work page doi:10.1109/tasc.2024.3416524 2024

  16. [16]

    Flux vortices and transport currents in type II superconductors,

    A. M. Campbell and J. E. Evetts, “Flux vortices and transport currents in type II superconductors,”Advances in Physics, vol. 21, no. 90, pp. 199–428, 1972. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1080/ 00018737200101288

    1972

  17. [17]

    Type-II-superconductor strip with current in a perpendicular magnetic field,

    E. H. Brandt and M. Indenbom, “Type-II-superconductor strip with current in a perpendicular magnetic field,”Physical Review B, vol. 48, no. 17, pp. 12 893–12 906, 1993. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.48.12893

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.48.12893 1993

  18. [18]

    Fast numerical computation of current distribution and AC losses in helically wound thin tape conductors: Single-layer coaxial arrangement,

    M. Siahrang, F. Sirois, D. N. Nguyen, S. Babic, and S. P. Ashworth, “Fast numerical computation of current distribution and AC losses in helically wound thin tape conductors: Single-layer coaxial arrangement,” IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 2381–2389, 2010

    2010

  19. [19]

    Finite-element for- mulations for systems with high-temperature superconductors,

    J. Dular, C. Geuzaine, and B. Vanderheyden, “Finite-element for- mulations for systems with high-temperature superconductors,”IEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 1–13, 2020

    2020

  20. [20]

    Understanding AC losses in CORC cables of YBCO superconducting tapes by numerical simulations,

    L. N. Nguyen, N. Shields, S. Ashworth, and D. N. Nguyen, “Understanding AC losses in CORC cables of YBCO superconducting tapes by numerical simulations,”Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 134, no. 14, p. 143903, 10 2023. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0162439

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0162439 2023

  21. [21]

    Reduction of AC losses in HTS power transmission cables made of coated conductors by overlapping the tapes,

    M. Siahrang and F. Sirois, “Reduction of AC losses in HTS power transmission cables made of coated conductors by overlapping the tapes,”Superconductor Science and Technology, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 015004, dec 2010. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1088/ 0953-2048/24/1/015004

    2010

  22. [22]

    Behavior of bulk high-temperature superconductors of finite thickness subjected to crossed magnetic fields: Experiment and model,

    P. Vanderbemden, Z. Hong, T. A. Coombs, S. Denis, M. Ausloos, J. Schwartz, I. B. Rutel, N. Hari Babu, D. A. Cardwell, and A. M. Campbell, “Behavior of bulk high-temperature superconductors of finite thickness subjected to crossed magnetic fields: Experiment and model,” Phys. Rev. B, vol. 75, p. 174515, May 2007. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/d...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.75.174515 2007

  23. [23]

    Carr Jr.,AC Loss and Macroscopic Theory of Superconductors (2nd ed.)

    W. Carr Jr.,AC Loss and Macroscopic Theory of Superconductors (2nd ed.). CRC Press, 2001

    2001