pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.13573 · v1 · pith:SS3ZSXOLnew · submitted 2026-06-11 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Tuning perpendicular magnetic anisotropy in ultra-low damping Li_(0.5)Al_(x)Fe_((2.5-x))O₄ thin films for efficient spin-orbit torque switching

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 05:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords perpendicular magnetic anisotropyspin-orbit torqueultra-low dampingmagnetic insulatorsspinel ferritesthin filmsLi0.5AlxFe(2.5-x)O4
0
0 comments X

The pith

Varying aluminum concentration in Li0.5AlxFe(2.5-x)O4 films tunes saturation magnetization and perpendicular anisotropy while keeping Gilbert damping at 2×10^{-4} and SOT efficiencies constant.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that epitaxial Li0.5AlxFe(2.5-x)O4 thin films allow systematic adjustment of magnetic properties through aluminum substitution. Saturation magnetization and anisotropy respond to both composition and substrate strain, yet damping stays ultra-low because only Fe3+ ions carry the magnetism. Spin-orbit torque efficiency remains independent of the aluminum level and depends instead on interface quality. An optimal point at x=0.7 balances stable but modest perpendicular anisotropy with low switching currents, positioning the material for devices that move information via spin waves rather than charge flow.

Core claim

In LAFO films, increasing aluminum concentration x reduces saturation magnetization and can be used with substrate choice to set perpendicular magnetic anisotropy; Gilbert damping reaches 2×10^{-4} and stays low because magnetic activity is restricted to Fe3+ cations, while damping-like SOT efficiency is set by interface quality and does not vary with x. The composition x=0.7 yields stable PMA with small anisotropy fields together with low critical current densities for SOT switching.

What carries the argument

Aluminum substitution x in the spinel Li0.5AlxFe(2.5-x)O4, which adjusts magnetization and anisotropy through strain and cation distribution while preserving low damping from Fe3+ and composition-independent SOT efficiency set at the interface.

If this is right

  • PMA is adjustable via epitaxial strain by selecting both aluminum level and substrate.
  • Low critical SOT switching currents appear when PMA is present but small.
  • Damping remains composition-independent once only Fe3+ ions are magnetically active.
  • SOT efficiency stays constant across aluminum concentrations when interface quality is fixed.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same composition series could be grown on additional substrates to map the full strain window for PMA without raising damping.
  • Devices that combine these films with heavy-metal underlayers could test whether the reported low currents translate to room-temperature spin-wave logic circuits.
  • If interface quality dominates SOT, deliberate interface engineering such as insertion layers should raise efficiency without changing bulk composition.

Load-bearing premise

Ultra-low damping arises mainly from restricting magnetic ions to Fe3+ and SOT efficiency is set only by interface quality independent of aluminum content.

What would settle it

Measuring Gilbert damping above 2×10^{-4} in otherwise identical films that contain magnetic cations other than Fe3+, or finding SOT efficiency that changes systematically with aluminum concentration, would falsify the central attributions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.13573 by Alpha T. N'Diaye, Anna Janni, Christoph Klewe, Daisy O'Mahoney, Muzhda Mehrzad, Sauviz P. Alaei, Yuri Suzuki, Zbigniew Galazka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Structural characterization of LAFO. (a) XRD spec [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. X-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) of Fe [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Static magnetic measurements at room temperature [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Ferromagnetic resonance of LAFO. (a) frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Spin-torque ferromagnetic resonance (a) Pt/LAFO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Current induced spin-orbit torque switching of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultra-thin magnetic insulator films that simultaneously exhibit ultra-low magnon damping, perpendicular magnetic anisotropy (PMA), and low spin-orbit torque (SOT) switching current densities are highly desirable, albeit challenging, for next-generation spintronic technologies that exploit spin waves to transport information without dissipative charge currents. Here, we demonstrate this combination of properties in ferrimagnetic spinel Li$_{0.5}$Al$_{x}$Fe$_{(2.5-x)}$O$_4$ (LAFO) thin films. Through this model system, we find that PMA can be tuned by epitaxial strain in the form of chemical composition and substrate choice and that low SOT switching current densities correlate with small but finite PMA. Ultra-low damping is stabilized primarily by having only Fe$^{3+}$ as magnetically active cations with secondary effects due to increased disorder from Al substitution distribution. SOT efficiency is governed by interface quality and independent of chemical composition. By varying the Al concentration, we systematically tune the saturation magnetization and magnetic anisotropy while maintaining ultra-low Gilbert damping parameters as low as $2\times10^{-4}$ and composition-independent damping-like SOT efficiencies. We identify an optimal composition LAFO x=0.7 (Li$_{0.5}$Al$_{0.7}$Fe$_{1.8}$O$_4$), which combines ultra-low damping, stable PMA with small anisotropy fields, and low critical current densities for SOT switching, establishing it as a promising material platform for energy-efficient spin-wave and spintronic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental results on epitaxial Li_{0.5}Al_x Fe_{(2.5-x)}O_4 (LAFO) thin films in which Al substitution is used to tune saturation magnetization and perpendicular magnetic anisotropy while preserving ultra-low Gilbert damping (down to 2 imes10^{-4}) and composition-independent damping-like SOT efficiencies. The authors identify x=0.7 as optimal, attributing the low damping primarily to the presence of only Fe^{3+} as magnetic cations (with Al disorder as a secondary effect) and the SOT efficiency to interface quality independent of bulk composition.

Significance. If the reported combination of properties is robustly demonstrated, the work would identify a useful materials platform for low-power spintronic and magnonic devices that require simultaneous PMA, ultra-low damping, and efficient SOT switching.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and damping/SOT discussion] Abstract and main text (damping and SOT sections): The claim that ultra-low damping is stabilized primarily by restricting magnetic cations to Fe^{3+} (with Al disorder secondary) and that SOT efficiency is governed solely by interface quality and is composition-independent rests on correlational observations. No frequency-dependent FMR linewidth decomposition isolating the intrinsic Gilbert term from two-magnon scattering or inhomogeneous broadening across the full x series, nor controls that fix interface quality while varying bulk composition, are presented. These omissions leave the stated causal attributions unsupported.
  2. [Results and methods] Results and methods: No error bars, raw FMR or SOT switching traces, or detailed measurement protocols (e.g., frequency range, fitting procedures, or statistical criteria) are provided. The post-hoc identification of x=0.7 as optimal therefore cannot be evaluated for robustness or selection bias without the complete dataset.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments, which help clarify the strength of our claims. We respond point by point below and will revise the manuscript accordingly where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract and damping/SOT discussion] Abstract and main text (damping and SOT sections): The claim that ultra-low damping is stabilized primarily by restricting magnetic cations to Fe^{3+} (with Al disorder secondary) and that SOT efficiency is governed solely by interface quality and is composition-independent rests on correlational observations. No frequency-dependent FMR linewidth decomposition isolating the intrinsic Gilbert term from two-magnon scattering or inhomogeneous broadening across the full x series, nor controls that fix interface quality while varying bulk composition, are presented. These omissions leave the stated causal attributions unsupported.

    Authors: We agree that the attributions are based on systematic trends observed across the composition series rather than direct decomposition or fixed-interface controls. The persistence of ultra-low damping (down to 2e-4) despite increasing Al substitution, with only Fe^{3+} as the magnetic cation, is consistent with the primary role of cation valence; the modest increase in damping with x supports a secondary role for disorder. For SOT, all films share identical Pt interfaces and growth conditions, providing a basis for composition independence. However, we acknowledge the correlational nature and will revise the abstract and discussion to use more cautious language (e.g., 'supported by' rather than 'stabilized primarily by') and add a limitations paragraph noting the absence of frequency-dependent linewidth analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Results and methods] Results and methods: No error bars, raw FMR or SOT switching traces, or detailed measurement protocols (e.g., frequency range, fitting procedures, or statistical criteria) are provided. The post-hoc identification of x=0.7 as optimal therefore cannot be evaluated for robustness or selection bias without the complete dataset.

    Authors: We apologize for these omissions in the submitted version. We will add error bars to all data points in the figures, include representative raw FMR spectra and SOT switching loops (with full datasets) in the supplementary information, and expand the Methods section to specify the FMR frequency range (4–12 GHz), linewidth fitting procedures (linear vs. nonlinear models), and the quantitative criteria (balancing damping, anisotropy field, and switching current density) used to identify x=0.7 as optimal. This will allow readers to assess robustness directly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental measurements of film properties rely on standard external techniques

full rationale

The paper reports growth and characterization of LAFO thin films, with PMA tuned via strain/composition, damping extracted from FMR linewidths, and SOT efficiencies from switching measurements. All central quantities (Ms, anisotropy fields, Gilbert damping α ≈ 2×10^{-4}, damping-like torque efficiencies) are obtained via direct experimental protocols and standard fitting routines that do not reduce to self-referential definitions or prior self-citations. Attributions about Fe^{3+}-only cations and interface-dominated SOT are interpretive statements, not load-bearing derivations. No equations or uniqueness theorems are invoked that loop back to the paper's own fitted values. The work is self-contained against external benchmarks (FMR, magnetometry, SOT switching standards).

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental materials paper; central claims rest on standard assumptions of epitaxial growth and accurate magnetometry rather than new theoretical constructs. No free parameters are fitted to produce the headline numbers; x is an experimental variable.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Epitaxial strain from substrate and composition controls PMA without introducing additional loss channels beyond those stated.
    Invoked when attributing PMA tuning and damping stability to strain and Fe^{3+} only.
  • domain assumption SOT efficiency depends only on interface quality and is independent of bulk composition.
    Stated directly in the abstract as governing mechanism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5863 in / 1396 out tokens · 20887 ms · 2026-06-27T05:57:38.246693+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author G. F. \ Dionne ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1657219 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 40 ,\ pages 4486 ( year 1969 ) NoStop

  2. [2]

    author author S. A. \ Mazen \ and\ author T. A. \ Elmosalami ,\ https://doi.org/10.5402/2011/820726 journal journal IRSN Condens. Matter Phys. \ volume 2011 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  3. [3]

    Shiota , author D

    author author Y. Shiota , author D. Kan , author R. Hisatomi , author S. Karube , author Y. Shimakawa ,\ and\ author T. Ono ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 25 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

  4. [4]

    author author D. W. \ Strickler \ and\ author R. Roy ,\ @noop journal journal J. Am. Ceram. Soc. \ volume 44 ,\ pages 225 ( year 1961 ) NoStop

  5. [5]

    Brice-Profeta , author M.-A

    author author S. Brice-Profeta , author M.-A. \ Arrio , author E. Tronc , author N. Menguy , author I. Letard , author C. Cartier dit Moulin , author M. Noguès , author C. Chanéac , author J.-P. \ Jolivet , author P. Sainctavit ,\ and\ author et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.120 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 288 ,\ pages 3...

  6. [6]

    \ Kim , author T

    author author J.-Y. \ Kim , author T. Y. \ Koo ,\ and\ author J.-H. \ Park ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.047205 journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 96 ,\ pages 047205 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

  7. [7]

    Karimeddiny \ and\ author D

    author author S. Karimeddiny \ and\ author D. C. \ Ralph ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 15 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  8. [8]

    Li , author L

    author author P. Li , author L. J. \ Riddiford , author C. Bi , author J. J. \ Wisser , author X.-Q. \ Sun , author A. Vailionis , author M. J. \ Veit , author A. Altman , author X. Li , author M. Dc , author S. X. \ Wang , author Y. Suzuki ,\ and\ author S. Emori ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 5 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  9. [9]

    Liu , author T

    author author L. Liu , author T. Moriyama , author D. C. \ Ralph ,\ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 106 ,\ pages 036601 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

  10. [10]

    Nan , author S

    author author T. Nan , author S. Emori , author C. T. \ Boone , author X. Wang , author T. M. \ Oxholm , author J. G. \ Jones , author B. M. \ Howe , author G. J. \ Brown ,\ and\ author N. X. \ Sun ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. \ volume 91 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  11. [11]

    author author B. K. \ Kuanr , author V. Veerakumar , author A. V. \ Kuanr , author R. E. \ Camley ,\ and\ author Z. Celinski ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans. Magn. \ volume 45 ,\ pages 4015 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

  12. [12]

    author author E. R. \ Rosenberg , author L. c. v. \ Beran , author C. O. \ Avci , author C. Zeledon , author B. Song , author C. Gonzalez-Fuentes , author J. Mendil , author P. Gambardella , author M. Veis , author C. Garcia , author G. S. D. \ Beach ,\ and\ author C. A. \ Ross ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.094405 journal journal Phys. Rev...

  13. [13]

    Lee-Wong , author J

    author author E. Lee-Wong , author J. Ding , author X. Wang , author C. Liu , author N. J. \ McLaughlin , author H. Wang , author M. Wu ,\ and\ author C. R. \ Du ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.15.034031 journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 034031 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

  14. [14]

    Li , author J

    author author P. Li , author J. Ding , author S. S.-L. \ Zhang , author J. Kally , author T. Pillsbury , author O. G. \ Heinonen , author G. Rimal , author C. Bi , author A. DeMann , author S. B. \ Field , author W. Wang , author J. Tang , author J. S. \ Jiang , author A. Hoffmann , author N. Samarth ,\ and\ author M. Wu ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Lett...

  15. [15]

    Soumah , author N

    author author L. Soumah , author N. Beaulieu , author L. Qassym , author C. Carrétéro , author E. Jacquet , author R. Lebourgeois , author J. Ben Youssef , author P. Bortolotti , author V. Cros ,\ and\ author A. Anane ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-05732-1 journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 3355 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  16. [16]

    author author V. G. \ Harris ,\ @noop journal journal IEEE Trans. Magn. \ volume 48 ,\ pages 1075 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

  17. [17]

    Yang , author L

    author author M. Yang , author L. Sun , author Y. Zeng , author J. Cheng , author K. He , author X. Yang , author Z. Wang , author L. Yu , author H. Niu , author T. Ji , author G. Chen , author B. Miao , author X. Wang ,\ and\ author H. Ding ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Commun. \ volume 15 ,\ pages 3201 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

  18. [18]

    Satapathy , author P

    author author S. Satapathy , author P. K. \ Siwach , author H. K. \ Singh , author R. P. \ Pant ,\ and\ author K. K. \ Maurya ,\ @noop journal journal Physica B Condens. Matter \ volume 669 ,\ pages 415278 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  19. [19]

    Ngaloy , author N

    author author R. Ngaloy , author N. Yamashita , author B. Zhao , author S. Kim , author K. Yamashita , author I. P. C. \ Cools , author M. N. \ Agusutrisno , author S. Lee , author Y. Kurokawa , author C.-Y. \ You , author H. Yuasa ,\ and\ author S. P. \ Dash ,\ @noop journal journal Npj Spintron. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 40 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  20. [20]

    Shao , author C

    author author Q. Shao , author C. Tang , author G. Yu , author A. Navabi , author H. Wu , author C. He , author J. Li , author P. Upadhyaya , author P. Zhang , author S. A. \ Razavi , author Q. L. \ He , author Y. Liu , author P. Yang , author S. K. \ Kim , author C. Zheng , author Y. Liu , author L. Pan , author R. K. \ Lake , author X. Han , author Y. T...

  21. [21]

    Lin , author L

    author author Y. Lin , author L. Jin , author D. Zhang ,\ and\ author H. Zhang ,\ @noop journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 579 ,\ pages 170681 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  22. [22]

    author author M. T. \ Gray , author S. Emori , author B. A. \ Gray , author H. Jeon , author van 't , author O. M. J. \ Erve , author B. T. \ Jonker , author S. Kim , author M. Suzuki , author T. Ono , author B. M. \ Howe ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Appl. \ volume 9 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  23. [23]

    author author L. J. \ Riddiford , author J. J. \ Wisser , author S. Emori , author P. Li , author D. Roy , author E. Cogulu , author O. van 't Erve , author Y. Deng , author S. X. \ Wang , author B. T. \ Jonker , author A. D. \ Kent ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 115 ,\ pages 122401 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  24. [24]

    Emori , author D

    author author S. Emori , author D. Yi , author S. Crossley , author J. J. \ Wisser , author P. P. \ Balakrishnan , author B. Khodadadi , author P. Shafer , author C. Klewe , author A. T. \ N'Diaye , author B. T. \ Urwin , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 4273 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

  25. [25]

    author author X. Y. \ Zheng , author L. J. \ Riddiford , author J. J. \ Wisser , author S. Emori ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0023077 journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 117 ,\ pages 092407 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  26. [26]

    author author X. Y. \ Zheng , author S. Channa , author L. J. \ Riddiford , author J. J. \ Wisser , author K. Mahalingam , author C. T. \ Bowers , author M. E. \ McConney , author A. T. \ N’Diaye , author A. Vailionis , author E. Cogulu , author H. Ren , author Z. Galazka , author A. D. \ Kent ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal Nat. Comms. ...

  27. [27]

    O'Mahoney , author S

    author author D. O'Mahoney , author S. Channa , author X. Y. \ Zheng , author A. Vailionis , author P. Shafer , author A. T. \ N'Diaye , author C. Klewe ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 123 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

  28. [28]

    author author S. P. \ Alaei , author R. Raj , author S. Channa , author L. Takana , author D. O'Mahoney , author X. Y. \ Zheng , author E. E. \ Fleck , author T.-Y. \ Chen , author Z. Galazka , author A. D. \ Kent , author K. A. \ Mkhoyan ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 127 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  29. [29]

    Takana , author S

    author author L. Takana , author S. Channa , author X. Y. \ Zheng , author D. O'Mahoney , author S. Alaei , author Y. Li , author A. Vailionis , author P. Shafer , author A. T. \ N'Diaye , author C. Klewe , author I. Fisher ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 127 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

  30. [30]

    Li , author K

    author author Y. Li , author K. Mikhailova , author L. Takana , author D. O'Mahoney , author S. P. \ Alaei , author G. Qu , author D. Petruzzi , author S. Crossley , author H. Y. \ Hwang , author I. R. \ Fisher , author C. C. \ Yu ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2026 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.23943 arXiv:2604.23943 [...

  31. [31]

    Pal , author G

    author author S. Pal , author G. Qu , author H. M. \ Carruzzo , author K. Mikhailova , author L. Takana , author Q. Xu , author Y. Suzuki , author C. C. \ Yu ,\ and\ author G. D. \ Fuchs ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 10 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

  32. [32]

    Tong , author H

    author author J. Tong , author H. Paudyal , author X. Liu , author L. Takana , author K. Mikhailova , author Y. Suzuki , author D. Paudyal ,\ and\ author X. Li ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Lett. \ volume 26 ,\ pages 3073 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

  33. [33]

    Mikhailova , author L

    author author K. Mikhailova , author L. Takana , author G. Qu , author J. A. \ Hofer , author H. M. \ Carruzzo , author I. K. \ Schuller , author C. C. \ Yu ,\ and\ author Y. Suzuki ,\ @noop journal journal arXiv \ ( year 2026 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2604.24094 arXiv:2604.24094 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci] NoStop

  34. [34]

    Galazka , author D

    author author Z. Galazka , author D. Klimm , author K. Irmscher , author R. Uecker , author M. Pietsch , author R. Bertram , author M. Naumann , author M. Albrecht , author A. Kwasniewski , author R. Schewski ,\ and\ author M. Bickermann ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Status Solidi (A) \ volume 212 ,\ pages 1455 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  35. [35]

    Galazka , author S

    author author Z. Galazka , author S. Ganschow , author K. Irmscher , author D. Klimm , author M. Albrecht , author R. Schewski , author M. Pietsch , author T. Schulz , author A. Dittmar , author A. Kwasniewski , author R. Grueneberg , author S. B. \ Anooz , author A. Popp , author U. Juda , author I. M. \ Hanke , author T. Schroeder ,\ and\ author M. Bick...

  36. [36]

    @noop note See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional experimental methods, derivations, and supporting figures NoStop

  37. [37]

    author author J. A. \ Schulkes \ and\ author G. Blasse ,\ @noop journal journal J. Phys. Chem. Solids \ volume 24 ,\ pages 1651 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

  38. [38]

    Emori , author B

    author author S. Emori , author B. A. \ Gray , author H.-M. \ Jeon , author J. Peoples , author M. Schmitt , author K. Mahalingam , author M. Hill , author M. E. \ McConney , author M. T. \ Gray , author U. S. \ Alaan , et al. ,\ @noop journal journal Adv. Mater. \ volume 29 ,\ pages 1701130 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

  39. [39]

    Schmidt , author C

    author author G. Schmidt , author C. Hauser , author M. Trempler , Philip andcPaleschke ,\ and\ author E. T. \ Papaioannou ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Status Solidi B Basic Res. \ volume 257 ,\ pages 1900644 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

  40. [40]

    author author R. O. \ Serha , author C. Dubs , author C. Guguschev , author B. Aichner , author D. Schmoll , author J. Sch \"a fer , author J. Panda , author M. Weiler , author P. Pirro , author M. Urb \'a nek ,\ and\ author A. V. \ Chumak ,\ @noop journal journal Commun. Mater. \ ( year 2026 ) NoStop

  41. [41]

    Hauser , author T

    author author C. Hauser , author T. Richter , author N. Homonnay , author C. Eisenschmidt , author M. Qaid , author H. Deniz , author D. Hesse , author M. Sawicki , author S. G. \ Ebbinghaus ,\ and\ author G. Schmidt ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20827 journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 6 ,\ pages 2045 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

  42. [42]

    Farle ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/61/7/001 journal journal Rep

    author author M. Farle ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/61/7/001 journal journal Rep. Prog. Phys. \ volume 61 ,\ pages 755–826 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

  43. [43]

    Lindner , author I

    author author J. Lindner , author I. Barsukov , author C. Raeder , author C. Hassel , author O. Posth , author R. Meckenstock , author P. Landeros ,\ and\ author D. L. \ Mills ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.224421 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 80 ,\ pages 224421 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

  44. [44]

    Shao , author P

    author author Q. Shao , author P. Li , author L. Liu , author H. Yang , author S. Fukami , author A. Razavi , author H. Wu , author K. Wang , author F. Freimuth , author Y. Mokrousov , author M. D. \ Stiles , author S. Emori , author A. Hoffmann , author J. Akerman , author K. Roy , author J.-P. \ Wang , author S.-H. \ Yang , author K. Garello ,\ and\ aut...

  45. [45]

    Schreier , author T

    author author M. Schreier , author T. Chiba , author A. Niedermayr , author J. Lotze , author H. Huebl , author S. Gepr \"a gs , author S. Takahashi , author G. E. W. \ Bauer , author R. Gross ,\ and\ author S. T. B. \ Goennenwein ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. \ volume 92 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  46. [46]

    Sklenar , author W

    author author J. Sklenar , author W. Zhang , author M. B. \ Jungfleisch , author W. Jiang , author H. Chang , author J. E. \ Pearson , author M. Wu , author J. B. \ Ketterson ,\ and\ author A. Hoffmann ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. \ volume 92 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  47. [47]

    Li , author L

    author author P. Li , author L. J. \ Riddiford , author C. Bi , author J. J. \ Wisser , author X.-Q. \ Sun , author A. Vailionis , author M. J. \ Veit , author A. Altman , author X. Li , author M. Dc , author S. X. \ Wang , author Y. Suzuki ,\ and\ author S. Emori ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Mater. \ volume 5 ( year 2021 b ) NoStop

  48. [48]

    \ Pai , author Y

    author author C.-F. \ Pai , author Y. Ou , author L. H. \ Vilela-Le \ a o , author D. C. \ Ralph ,\ and\ author R. A. \ Buhrman ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. \ volume 92 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

  49. [49]

    \ Chen , author S

    author author Y.-T. \ Chen , author S. Takahashi , author H. Nakayama , author M. Althammer , author S. T. B. \ Goennenwein , author E. Saitoh ,\ and\ author G. E. W. \ Bauer ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. \ volume 87 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

  50. [50]

    Fedel \ and\ author C

    author author S. Fedel \ and\ author C. O. \ Avci ,\ @noop journal journal Commun. Phys. \ volume 9 ,\ pages 99 ( year 2026 ) NoStop

  51. [51]

    author author C. Y. \ Guo , author C. H. \ Wan , author M. K. \ Zhao , author H. Wu , author C. Fang , author Z. R. \ Yan , author J. F. \ Feng , author H. F. \ Liu ,\ and\ author X. F. \ Han ,\ @noop journal journal Appl. Phys. Lett. \ volume 114 ,\ pages 192409 ( year 2019 ) NoStop

  52. [52]

    \ Oh , author S.-H

    author author Y.-W. \ Oh , author S.-H. \ Chris Baek , author Y. M. \ Kim , author H. Y. \ Lee , author K.-D. \ Lee , author C.-G. \ Yang , author E.-S. \ Park , author K.-S. \ Lee , author K.-W. \ Kim , author G. Go , author J.-R. \ Jeong , author B.-C. \ Min , author H.-W. \ Lee , author K.-J. \ Lee ,\ and\ author B.-G. \ Park ,\ @noop journal journal N...

  53. [53]

    Chen , author J

    author author S. Chen , author J. Yu , author Q. Xie , author X. Zhang , author W. Lin , author L. Liu , author J. Zhou , author X. Shu , author R. Guo , author Z. Zhang ,\ and\ author J. Chen ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces \ volume 11 ,\ pages 30446 ( year 2019 ) NoStop