Evidence for a $\bar{K}NN$ quasi-bound state in the $\gamma d \to K^0\Lambda p$ reaction

A. O. Tokiyasu; C. Rangacharyulu; C. Yoshida; H. Katsuragawa; H. Kohri; H. Ohkuma; H. Ohnishi; H. Shimizu; J. K. Ahn; K. Mizutani

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 37 references

Evidence for a $\bar{K}NN$ quasi-bound state in the $\gamma d \to K^0\Lambda p$ reaction

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-07-14 · grok-4.5

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Photoproduction of the deuteron shows a 7.3σ low-momentum-transfer excess below the K−pp threshold, supporting a K̄NN quasi-bound state.

desk verdict First exclusive photoproduction evidence for a K̄NN candidate: clean 2-D excess at low q, 7.3σ under a standard template, but the significance is conditional on the Voigt×Gaussian ansatz. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.16258 v2 pith:IKMNJZLO submitted 2026-06-15 nucl-ex

R. Kobayakawa , J. K. Ahn , S. Ajimura , W.-C. Chang , M.-L. Chu , S. Daté , T. Gogami , T. A. Hashimoto

show 29 more authors

T. Hotta T. Ishikawa H. Katsuragawa H. Kohri Y. Ma M. Miyabe K. Mizutani N. Muramatsu T. Nakano T. H. Nam M. Niiyama Y. Nozawa Y. Ohashi H. Ohkuma H. Ohnishi T. Ohta C. Rangacharyulu S. Y. Ryu Y. Sada H. Shimizu M. Sumihama S. Suzuki S. Tanaka A. O. Tokiyasu N. Tomida K. Watanabe T. Yorita C. Yoshida M. Yosoi (LEPS2/Solenoid Collaboration)

This is my paper · ORCID

classification nucl-ex

keywords photoproductionkaonicnucleiK-barNNquasi-boundstategammadtoK0LambdapmomentumtransferLEPS2Breit-Wigner

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This experiment measures the exclusive γd → K^{0}Λp reaction with a large-acceptance solenoid spectrometer to look for the simplest kaonic nucleus, a quasi-bound K̄NN system. In the two-dimensional plane of Λp invariant mass and momentum transfer, a clear localized excess appears below the K−pp mass threshold and is concentrated at low momentum transfer. An extended maximum-likelihood template fit that includes quasi-free, phase-space, and non-strange backgrounds finds that a signal component with a Voigt mass line shape times a Gaussian form factor in momentum transfer is required at 7.3σ local significance. The fitted effective mass, width, and form-factor scale are reported; the form-factor scale is consistent with the earlier hadron-beam observation of a similar structure. The result supplies the first photoproduction evidence for a K̄NN quasi-bound state and shows that photon-induced reactions on the deuteron can form such compact systems at low momentum transfer.

What carries the argument

The two-dimensional extended maximum-likelihood fit of the (M_Λp, q) histogram, in which a signal template is formed by reweighting three-body phase space with a Voigt (Breit–Wigner convolved with resolution) line shape in mass times a Gaussian form factor exp(−q^{2}/Q^{2}) in momentum transfer; the likelihood ratio of signal-plus-background versus background-only supplies the 7.3σ local significance.

What would settle it

A higher-statistics exclusive measurement of the same or a related photoproduction channel (for example with beam asymmetry or an isospin partner) that finds no localized low-q excess below the K−pp threshold after the same two-dimensional template fit would refute the claimed signal.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

A localized enhancement is observed in the (M_Λp, q) distribution of γd → K^{0}Λp below the K−pp threshold and at low momentum transfer. A two-dimensional template fit yields a local significance of 7.3σ for a signal component whose effective shape parameters are M = 2.354 ± 0.011(stat.)+0.009/−0.005(syst.) GeV/c^{2}, Γ = 0.055 ± 0.023(stat.)+0.031/−0.009(syst.) GeV/c^{2}, and Q = 0.350 ± 0.041(stat.)+0.035/−0.010(syst.) GeV/c, supporting the existence of a K̄NN quasi-bound state in photoproduction.

Load-bearing premise

The localized excess is assumed to be well described by a Breit–Wigner mass peak times a Gaussian form factor in momentum transfer, and residual backgrounds and interference are assumed not to generate a comparable low-momentum-transfer subthreshold structure.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

This is the first exclusive γd→K0Λp result that shows a clear low-q, subthreshold excess and claims a K̄NN quasi-bound state. That is genuinely new relative to the earlier inclusive LEPS search and complementary to J-PARC E15.

What they did well is the experimental chain. Large-acceptance solenoid, PID likelihoods, displaced Λ vertex, kinematic fit that tightens M_Λp resolution to 11 MeV/c², and a binned 2-D extended ML fit with four templates (QF weighted to CLAS + AV18, pure PS, sideband NS, and signal). They check that a two-step rescattering template fits to zero, that dropping NS leaves M, Γ, Q stable, and that Fermi-wave-function swaps (Paris, CD-Bonn) do not invent the excess. The Chernoff mixture for the boundary at zero yield is the right asymptotic tool; 10^5 toys validate the tail. Forward K0 peaking is shown and matches the low-q kinematics they emphasize. Citations are appropriate and the E15 comparison is honest about the mass offset.

The soft spot is real but not fatal. The signal is not free-form: it is PS reweighted by a Voigt in M_Λp times a Gaussian form factor in q. The 7.3σ therefore measures improvement over a background model that has no low-q peaking component. They do not inject a smooth t-channel or coupled-channel continuum that itself prefers low q and re-fit; if that can absorb the excess, the significance drops. They already flag that M and Γ are effective, reaction-dependent shape parameters, not universal pole positions, and the mass sits ~26 MeV higher than E15. Spin-parity remains open. Those are the right caveats; they do not erase the localized excess in the data.

This is for people working on kaonic nuclei, strangeness in few-body systems, and photoproduction mechanisms. The analysis is transparent enough that a referee can demand the missing background-shape tests without starting from zero. I would send it to peer review; the result is important enough in the subfield and the execution is solid enough to deserve that scrutiny. Engage with it if you care about the K̄NN question; treat the quoted significance as conditional on the ansatz until the continuum alternatives are closed.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an exclusive measurement of γd → K⁰Λp with the LEPS2 solenoid spectrometer, searching for a K̄NN quasi-bound state. A localized excess is observed in the two-dimensional (M_Λp, q) distribution below the K⁻pp threshold and at low momentum transfer q. An extended maximum-likelihood template fit (quasi-free, phase-space, non-strange sideband, and a Voigt×Gaussian signal component) yields a local significance of 7.3σ under a Chernoff-type boundary correction. Effective shape parameters are extracted: M = 2.354 ± 0.011(stat.)^{+0.009}_{-0.005}(syst.) GeV/c², Γ = 0.055 ± 0.023(stat.)^{+0.031}_{-0.009}(syst.) GeV/c², Q = 0.350 ± 0.041(stat.)^{+0.035}_{-0.010}(syst.) GeV/c. The authors interpret the structure as supporting a K̄NN quasi-bound state in photoproduction, complementary to the J-PARC E15 result.

Significance. If the excess is indeed a K̄NN quasi-bound state, the result is significant: it constitutes the first claim of such a state in a photon-induced exclusive channel, provides an independent entrance channel (spin-triplet deuteron target, possible spin-flip amplitudes, t-channel K* exchange), and reports a form-factor scale Q consistent with E15. Strengths include the kinematic fit that improves M_Λp resolution to 11 MeV/c², full Geant4 acceptance embedding of templates, explicit checks that a two-step rescattering template fits to zero and that omitting the NS component leaves M, Γ, Q stable, systematic variations of vertex cuts and deuteron wave functions (AV18/Paris/CD-Bonn), and a properly boundary-aware significance evaluation. These elements make the observation a valuable addition to the still-inconclusive experimental landscape of kaonic nuclei.

major comments (3)

Sec. IV and Eqs. (4)–(6): The quoted 7.3σ local significance and the claim of support for a quasi-bound state rest on a signal template that is phase-space reweighted by a Voigt profile in M_Λp times a Gaussian form factor exp(−q²/Q²). While the paper correctly shows that a dedicated two-step rescattering template yields a null contribution and that the NS component can be omitted without shifting the signal parameters, it does not test whether a smooth, non-resonant amplitude that itself peaks at low q (e.g., t-channel K* exchange interfering with continuum, or a coupled-channel distortion near the K⁻pp threshold) can absorb a comparable fraction of the localized excess once the same acceptance and kinematic-fit chain are applied. Because the likelihood-ratio TS = 64.9 is evaluated only against a background-only model lacking any low-q peaking component, the significance remains conditi
Sec. V.C (comparison with E15): The extracted mass lies ~26 MeV/c² higher than the E15 value (2.354 vs 2.328 GeV/c²) while Γ and Q are consistent within large uncertainties. The text correctly notes reaction-dependent distortions and possible interference, yet still presents the structure as evidence for the same K̄NN state. Given that the paper itself emphasizes that the parameters are “effective shape parameters” not directly comparable across channels, a clearer quantitative discussion of how large a mass shift is theoretically expected (or an explicit statement that the present data alone cannot establish identity with the E15 candidate) is required to avoid over-interpreting the agreement in Q.
Sec. V.A and Table 1: The fit reports N_Sig = 102 ± 30 against a total of roughly 700 events in the fit region, with QF still dominating (~60 %). The paper does not show the pull or residual distribution in the critical low-q, subthreshold corner after the background-only fit, nor does it quote the change in NLL when the Gaussian form-factor scale Q is fixed to a large value (i.e., no q peaking). These diagnostics would allow a reader to judge how much of the TS is driven by the localization in q versus the mass peak alone.

minor comments (4)

Fig. 2 caption and projections: The shaded uncertainty band is mentioned but its construction (profile likelihood? Hessian?) is not stated; a one-sentence clarification would help.
Sec. III.A: The relative-likelihood cut R_p ≥ 0.1 and the Λ-pairing likelihood are described, yet no purity or efficiency numbers (from MC or sidebands) are given; a short table or sentence would strengthen the PID discussion.
Eq. (7) and the Chernoff mixture: The validation with 10⁵ pseudo-experiments is welcome; stating the highest TS observed in those toys would make the tail comparison fully transparent.
Throughout: Occasional notation inconsistencies appear (e.g., q vs. |p_Λp|, M vs. M_Λp); a uniform choice would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: standard data-driven template fit of a phenomenological signal shape to an observed excess; parameters and significance are not forced by construction from prior inputs.

full rationale

The paper reports an experimental observation of a localized excess in the (M_Λp, q) plane and quantifies it via an extended maximum-likelihood fit of four templates (QF, PS, NS, Sig). The signal template is constructed by reweighting pure three-body phase space with a free Voigt profile in M_Λp (parameters M, Γ free; resolution fixed from MC) times a free Gaussian form factor in q (parameter Q free). These three shape parameters plus the signal yield are profiled in the likelihood-ratio test against a background-only hypothesis; the resulting TS = 64.9 and Chernoff-mixture local significance of 7.3σ are therefore data-driven characterizations of the excess under the stated ansatz, not predictions derived from previously fitted constants. Comparison to the external J-PARC E15 result is used only to motivate a physically guided mass-scan range and to note consistency of the form-factor scale; it does not fix the present yield or line shape. Self-citations are limited to apparatus and reconstruction papers (LEPS2 solenoid, BRPC, DAQ, KinFitter) that supply independent technical validation and do not enter the physics claim. No self-definitional loop, no fitted input re-labeled as prediction, no uniqueness theorem imported from overlapping authors, and no ansatz smuggled via self-citation appear in the derivation chain. Model-dependence of the significance on the Voigt imes Gaussian choice is a correctness/robustness issue, not circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on experimental data plus standard nuclear-physics modeling choices (Fermi motion, phase-space templates, Voigt signal shape, Gaussian form factor). Free parameters are the fitted signal shape and component yields. Domain assumptions include the adequacy of the background templates and the interpretation of a localized excess as a quasi-bound state rather than a pure threshold or interference effect. No new fundamental entities are invented; the K̄NN state is a pre-existing theoretical and experimental candidate.

free parameters (7)

Breit–Wigner mass M = 2.354 ± 0.011 (stat) +0.009/−0.005 (syst) GeV/c²
Free parameter of the Voigt signal template fitted to the (M_Λp, q) distribution.
Breit–Wigner width Γ = 0.055 ± 0.023 (stat) +0.031/−0.009 (syst) GeV/c²
Free width parameter of the signal line shape.
Gaussian form-factor scale Q = 0.350 ± 0.041 (stat) +0.035/−0.010 (syst) GeV/c
Free momentum-scale parameter controlling the low-q concentration of the signal.
Signal yield N_Sig = 102 ± 30
Fitted non-negative yield of the signal template in the extended ML fit.
Quasi-free yield N_QF = 406 ± 48
Fitted yield of the quasi-free γn→K0Λ (spectator p) template.
Phase-space yield N_PS = 111 ± 38
Fitted yield of the pure three-body phase-space template.
NS Gaussian scale Q_NS = 1.07 GeV/c
Scale of the Gaussian reweighting used to construct the non-strange sideband template; fixed from sideband fit.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption The observed (M_Λp, q) distribution can be modeled as a non-negative linear combination of four templates (QF, PS, NS, Sig) with the stated functional forms.
Core of the extended maximum-likelihood fit in Sec. IV; if an unmodeled process produces a similar localized excess, the signal assignment fails.
domain assumption Deuteron Fermi motion is adequately described by AV18 (nominal) or Paris/CD-Bonn wave functions for the quasi-free background.
Used to generate the QF MC template; systematic variations are quoted but the shape remains model-dependent.
domain assumption Non-strange background shape in the Λ signal region is well approximated by reweighting phase space with a Gaussian in q fixed from sidebands.
NS template construction; limited sideband statistics motivate the smooth reweighting.
standard math Likelihood-ratio test statistic under the background-only hypothesis follows a Chernoff-type ½δ(TS)+½χ²_4 mixture when the signal yield is constrained ≥0 and three shape parameters are profiled.
Used to convert TS_obs=64.9 into 7.3σ local significance; validated with 10^5 pseudo-experiments.
ad hoc to paper A localized subthreshold low-q enhancement is more naturally interpreted as a K̄NN quasi-bound state than as a pure threshold cusp or multi-step rescattering.
Interpretive step in the discussion; the paper itself notes that complex coupled-channel effects cannot be fully excluded.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evidence for a $\bar{K}NN$ quasi-bound state in the $\gamma d \to K^0\Lambda p$ reaction." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/IKMNJZLO

@misc{pith2026260616258,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evidence for a $\barKNN$ quasi-bound state in the $\gamma d \to K^0\Lambda p$ reaction},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/IKMNJZLO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.16258}
}

abstract

The $\gamma d \to K^{0}\Lambda p$ reaction has been studied to search for a $\bar{K}NN$ quasi-bound state using the LEPS2 solenoid spectrometer at SPring-8. A localized enhancement concentrated at low $q$ is observed in the $(M_{\Lambda p},q)$ distribution below the $K^-pp$ mass threshold, where $M_{\Lambda p}$ is the $\Lambda p$ invariant mass and $q \equiv |\vec{p}_{\gamma}-\vec{p}_{K^{0}}| = |\vec{p}_{\Lambda p}|$ is the momentum transfer. A two-dimensional $(M_{\Lambda p},q)$ fit demonstrates that the enhancement near the threshold is statistically significant, yielding a local significance of $7.3,\sigma$. The enhancement is characterized by effective shape parameters including the Breit--Wigner mass $M$ and width $\Gamma$, and a Gaussian form-factor momentum scale $Q$: $M = 2.354 \pm 0.011(\mathrm{stat.})^{+0.009}_{-0.005}(\mathrm{syst.})~\mathrm{GeV}/c^{2}$, $\Gamma = 0.055 \pm 0.023(\mathrm{stat.})^{+0.031}_{-0.009}(\mathrm{syst.})~\mathrm{GeV}/c^{2}$, and $Q = 0.350 \pm 0.041(\mathrm{stat.})^{+0.035}_{-0.010}(\mathrm{syst.})~\mathrm{GeV}/c$. The obtained results support the existence of a $\bar{K}NN$ quasi-bound state in photoproduction.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references

[1]

Hyodo, D

T. Hyodo, D. Jido, The nature of theΛ(1405) resonance in chiral dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 55–98. ��

2012
[2]

Akaishi, T

Y . Akaishi, T. Yamazaki, Nuclear¯� bound states in light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 044005. ��

2002
[3]

Gal, Recent studies of kaonic atoms and nuclear clusters, Nucl

A. Gal, Recent studies of kaonic atoms and nuclear clusters, Nucl. Phys. A 914 (2013) 270–279.��

2013
[4]

Hyodo, W

T. Hyodo, W. Weise, Theory of kaon-nuclear systems, in: Handbook of Nuclear Physics, Springer Nature Singapore, 2022.��

2022
[5]

Tolos, L

L. Tolos, L. Fabbietti, Strangeness in Nuclei and Neutron Stars, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 112 (2020) 103770. �� , ��

2020
[6]

N. V . Shevchenko, A. Gal, J. Mareš, Faddeev Calculation of a � − �� Quasibound State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 082301.��

2007
[7]

A. Doté, T. Hyodo, W. Weise, Variational calculation of the �� − system based on chiral SU(3) dynamics, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 014003. �� . 7

2009
[8]

Iwasaki, Kaonic Nuclei from the Experimental View- point, in: Handbook of Nuclear Physics, Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp

M. Iwasaki, Kaonic Nuclei from the Experimental View- point, in: Handbook of Nuclear Physics, Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp. 2699–2747. ��

2023

Show all 37 references

[9]

Agnello, et al., Evidence for a Kaon-Bound State� − �� Produced in � − Absorption Reactions at Rest, Phys

M. Agnello, et al., Evidence for a Kaon-Bound State� − �� Produced in � − Absorption Reactions at Rest, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005) 212303. ��

2005
[10]

Yamazaki, et al., Indication of a Deeply Bound and Compact � − �� State Formed in the ��→� Λ� + Reaction at 2.85 GeV, Phys

T. Yamazaki, et al., Indication of a Deeply Bound and Compact � − �� State Formed in the ��→� Λ� + Reaction at 2.85 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 104 (2010) 132502. ��

2010
[11]

Ichikawa, et al., Observation of the “� −��”-like struc- ture in the �(�+�� +) reaction at 1.69 GeV/�, Prog

Y . Ichikawa, et al., Observation of the “� −��”-like struc- ture in the �(�+�� +) reaction at 1.69 GeV/�, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015 (2) (2015) 021D01. ��

2015
[12]

A. O. Tokiyasu, et al., Search for � − �� bound state via ��→� +�−� reaction at � � =1 �5–2.4 GeV, Phys. Lett. B 728 (2014) 616–621, LEPS Collaboration. �� ,��

2014
[13]

Agakishiev, et al., Partial wave analysis of the reaction �(3�5 GeV)+ �→�� +Λto search for the “ �� −" bound state, Phys

G. Agakishiev, et al., Partial wave analysis of the reaction �(3�5 GeV)+ �→�� +Λto search for the “ �� −" bound state, Phys. Lett. B 742 (2015) 242–248. �� ,��

2015
[14]

Hashimoto, et al., Search for the deeply bound � − �� state from the semi-inclusive forward-neutron spectrum in the in-flight � − reaction on helium-3, Prog

T. Hashimoto, et al., Search for the deeply bound � − �� state from the semi-inclusive forward-neutron spectrum in the in-flight � − reaction on helium-3, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2015 (6) (2015) 061D01, J-PARC E15 Collaboration. ��

2015
[15]

Sada, et al., Structure near� − + � + � threshold in the in-flight 3He(� −�Λ�)� reaction, Prog

Y . Sada, et al., Structure near� − + � + � threshold in the in-flight 3He(� −�Λ�)� reaction, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016 (5) (2016) 051D01, J-PARC E15 Collaboration. ��

2016
[16]

Yamaga, et al., Observation of a �� bound state in the 3He(� −�Λ�)� reaction, Phys

T. Yamaga, et al., Observation of a �� bound state in the 3He(� −�Λ�)� reaction, Phys. Rev. C 102 (4) (2020) 044002.��

2020
[17]

Sumihama, et al., Backward-angle photoproduction of �0 and � mesons offthe proton at� � =1 �5–2�4 GeV, Phys

M. Sumihama, et al., Backward-angle photoproduction of �0 and � mesons offthe proton at� � =1 �5–2�4 GeV, Phys. Rev. C 73 (2006) 035214. ��

2006
[18]

Hicks, et al., Cross Sections and Beam Asymmetries for � +Σ∗− Photoproduction from the Deuteron at � � = 1�5 − 2�4 GeV, Phys

K. Hicks, et al., Cross Sections and Beam Asymmetries for � +Σ∗− Photoproduction from the Deuteron at � � = 1�5 − 2�4 GeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 102 (2009) 012501. ��

2009
[19]

Scheluchin, et al., Photoproduction of � +Λ(1405) → � +�0Σ0 extending to forward angles and low momentum transfer, Phys

G. Scheluchin, et al., Photoproduction of � +Λ(1405) → � +�0Σ0 extending to forward angles and low momentum transfer, Phys. Lett. B 833 (2022) 137375. ��

2022
[20]

Mart, Photo- and Electroproduction of� 0ΛNear Thresh- old and Effects of the � 0 Electromagnetic Form Factor, Phys

T. Mart, Photo- and Electroproduction of� 0ΛNear Thresh- old and Effects of the � 0 Electromagnetic Form Factor, Phys. Rev. C 83 (2011) 048203. ��

2011
[21]

Yamazaki, Y

T. Yamazaki, Y . Akaishi, The basic � − nuclear cluster � − �� and its enhanced formation in the � + �→� + + � reaction, Phys. Rev. C 76 (2007) 045201. ��

2007
[22]

LEPS2 Collaboration, Current status of the LEPS2 Solenoid Spectrometer, �� , (accessed 11 March 2026) (2024)

2026
[23]

Muramatsu, et al., SPring-8 LEPS2 beamline: A facility to produce a multi-GeV photon beam via laser Compton scattering, Nucl

N. Muramatsu, et al., SPring-8 LEPS2 beamline: A facility to produce a multi-GeV photon beam via laser Compton scattering, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 1033 (2022) 166677. ��

2022
[24]

Niiyama, Status and prospects of the LEPS2 solenoid spectrometer, Nuovo Cim

M. Niiyama, Status and prospects of the LEPS2 solenoid spectrometer, Nuovo Cim. C 47 (4) (2024) 239, for the LEPS2 Collaboration. ��

2024
[25]

Watanabe, et al., A compensated multi-gap RPC with 2 m strips for the LEPS2 experiment, Nucl

K. Watanabe, et al., A compensated multi-gap RPC with 2 m strips for the LEPS2 experiment, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 925 (2019) 188–192. �� , ��

2019
[26]

S. Y . Ryu, et al., Network-Distributed Data-Acquisition System for Photoproduction Experiments With LEPS2, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 72 (3) (2025) 348–354. ��

2025
[27]

Allison, et al., Recent developments in Geant4, Nucl

J. Allison, et al., Recent developments in Geant4, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 835 (2016) 186–225. ��

2016
[28]

Agostinelli, et al., GEANT4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl

S. Agostinelli, et al., GEANT4—a simulation toolkit, Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A 506 (2003) 250–303. ��

2003
[29]

Allison, et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans

J. Allison, et al., Geant4 developments and applications, IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 53 (1) (2006) 270–278. ��

2006
[30]

Göpfert, et al., KinFitter: A Kinematic Fit with Con- straints, GitHub repository, �� , (accessed 11 March 2026) (2011)

T. Göpfert, et al., KinFitter: A Kinematic Fit with Con- straints, GitHub repository, �� , (accessed 11 March 2026) (2011)

2026
[31]

Compton, et al., Measurement of the differential and total cross sections of the��→� 0Λ(�) reaction within the resonance region, Phys

N. Compton, et al., Measurement of the differential and total cross sections of the��→� 0Λ(�) reaction within the resonance region, Phys. Rev. C 96 (2017) 065201, CLAS Collaboration. �� , ��

2017
[32]

R. B. Wiringa, V . G. J. Stoks, R. Schiavilla, Accu- rate nucleon-nucleon potential with charge-independence breaking, Phys. Rev. C 51 (1995) 38–51. �� ,��. 8

1995
[33]

Chernoff, On the Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25 (3) (1954) 573– 578.��

H. Chernoff, On the Distribution of the Likelihood Ratio, The Annals of Mathematical Statistics 25 (3) (1954) 573– 578.��

1954
[34]

Cowan, K

G. Cowan, K. Cranmer, E. Gross, O. Vitells, Asymptotic formulae for likelihood-based tests of new physics, Eur. Phys. J. C 71 (2011) 1554. �� , ��

2011
[35]

Lacombe, B

M. Lacombe, B. Loiseau, J. M. Richard, R. Vinh Mau, J. Côté, P. Pirès, R. de Tourreil, Parametrization of the Paris N-N potential, Phys. Rev. C 21 (1980) 861. ��

1980
[36]

Machleidt, High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential, Phys

R. Machleidt, High-precision, charge-dependent Bonn nucleon-nucleon potential, Phys. Rev. C 63 (2001) 024001. ��

2001
[37]

Sekihara, E

T. Sekihara, E. Oset, A. Ramos, On the structure observed in the in-flight 3He(� −�Λ�)� reaction at J-PARC, Prog. Theor. Exp. Phys. 2016 (2016) 123D03. �� ,��. 9

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed July 14, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Hyodo, D

T. Hyodo, D. Jido, The nature of theΛ(1405) resonance in chiral dynamics, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 67 (2012) 55–98. ��

2012

[2] [2]

Akaishi, T

Y . Akaishi, T. Yamazaki, Nuclear¯� bound states in light nuclei, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002) 044005. ��

2002

[3] [3]

Gal, Recent studies of kaonic atoms and nuclear clusters, Nucl

A. Gal, Recent studies of kaonic atoms and nuclear clusters, Nucl. Phys. A 914 (2013) 270–279.��

2013

[4] [4]

Hyodo, W

T. Hyodo, W. Weise, Theory of kaon-nuclear systems, in: Handbook of Nuclear Physics, Springer Nature Singapore, 2022.��

2022

[5] [5]

Tolos, L

L. Tolos, L. Fabbietti, Strangeness in Nuclei and Neutron Stars, Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics 112 (2020) 103770. �� , ��

2020

[6] [6]

N. V . Shevchenko, A. Gal, J. Mareš, Faddeev Calculation of a � − �� Quasibound State, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 082301.��

2007

[7] [7]

A. Doté, T. Hyodo, W. Weise, Variational calculation of the �� − system based on chiral SU(3) dynamics, Phys. Rev. C 79 (2009) 014003. �� . 7

2009

[8] [8]

Iwasaki, Kaonic Nuclei from the Experimental View- point, in: Handbook of Nuclear Physics, Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp

M. Iwasaki, Kaonic Nuclei from the Experimental View- point, in: Handbook of Nuclear Physics, Springer Nature Singapore, 2023, pp. 2699–2747. ��

2023