pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17157 · v1 · pith:IWJL2ZIKnew · submitted 2026-06-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE · gr-qc

QPO-like Signatures and Hydrodynamical Variability in Accretion around a JNW-type Compact Spacetime in Freund-Nambu Scalar-Tensor Gravity

Orhan Donmez , M. Yousaf , G. Mustafa This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 02:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE gr-qc
keywords scalar-tensor gravitynaked singularityBondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretionquasi-periodic oscillationsshock coneFreund-Nambu gravityhydrodynamical variabilityJanis-Newman-Winicour solution
0
0 comments X

The pith

Numerical simulations show that shock-cone oscillations around a Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor naked singularity generate QPO-like frequencies matching those in stellar-mass black hole candidates.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper introduces a new exact solution in Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity that generalizes the Janis-Newman-Winicour naked singularity with an extra coupling parameter q. It models Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion onto this spacetime by solving the general relativistic hydrodynamic equations on the equatorial plane. Stronger scalar-tensor deviations alter shock-cone morphology, trap more matter near the center, and strengthen oscillations, which produce Lorentzian peaks in the power spectral density interpreted as hydrodynamically generated QPO-like modes. For a 10 solar-mass object these modes fall mainly between a few Hz and 100 Hz and overlap the timing features reported for sources such as GRS 1915+105. A sympathetic reader would care because the results suggest an observational route to detect scalar-field modifications through exterior accretion variability rather than direct metric measurements.

Core claim

The manuscript presents a new exact solution in the Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity scenario representing a nontrivial scalar-tensor generalization of the Janis-Newman-Winicour naked-singularity geometry with coupling parameter q. Numerical solution of the GR hydrodynamic equations for BHL accretion shows that stronger scalar-tensor deviations modify the shock-cone morphology, increase matter accumulation, enhance oscillations, and produce Lorentzian-like peaks in the PSD interpreted as hydrodynamically generated QPO-like modes with frequencies mainly from a few Hz to 100 Hz for M=10Msun, overlapping with stellar-mass BH candidates including GRS 1915+105.

What carries the argument

The shock-cone mechanism formed by Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion on the equatorial plane of the FNST compact spacetime, where oscillations and plasma compression drive the QPO-like modes.

If this is right

  • Stronger scalar-tensor deviations modify the shock-cone morphology.
  • They significantly increase the amount of matter accumulated near the central compact object.
  • They enhance the oscillatory behavior of the shock cone.
  • The resulting QPO-like frequencies overlap with those reported in stellar-mass black-hole-candidate systems.
  • For certain models the frequencies match timing features reported for GRS 1915+105.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the frequency overlap persists under varied initial conditions, timing observations of X-ray binaries could become a practical probe of scalar-tensor deviations.
  • The same hydrodynamic setup could be applied to other scalar-tensor spacetimes to isolate unique signatures not shared with the Schwarzschild case.
  • High-resolution parameter studies would be required to confirm that the extracted oscillation spectrum is insensitive to numerical resolution.
  • Absence of the predicted low-frequency modes in sources with independent mass and distance constraints would directly constrain the allowed range of q.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical integration of the general relativistic hydrodynamic equations on the FNST background accurately reproduces the physical shock-cone morphology and oscillation spectrum without dominant numerical artifacts or missing physics.

What would settle it

Detection of QPO frequencies around a compact object that lie outside the predicted ranges for all values of the scalar coupling parameter q, or the absence of such variability in sources where the models predict it should appear.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17157 by G. Mustafa, M. Yousaf, Orhan Donmez.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: The variation of the rest-mass density produced by BH [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: At the fixed radial position [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: The time evolution of the rest-mass flux through the in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: PSD analysis computed from the rest-mass flux measure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Scalar tensor theories of gravity provide a broad as well as physically rich extension of general theory of relativity by allowing the gravitational interaction to be mediated not only by the spacetime metric but also by scalar degrees of freedom. In this manuscript, we present a new exact solution in the Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor (FNST) gravity scenario, representing a nontrivial scalar-tensor generalization of the Janis-Newman-Winicour naked-singularity geometry, characterized by an additional coupling parameter q in the scalar sector. We also numerically solve the general relativistic hydrodynamic equations in order to investigate the shock-cone mechanism formed by Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion around this compact spacetime on the equatorial plane. We show that stronger scalar-tensor deviations modify the shock-cone morphology, significantly increase the amount of matter accumulated near the central compact object, and enhance the oscillatory behavior of the shock cone. The Lorentzian-like peaks obtained from the numerically computed power spectral density are interpreted as hydrodynamically generated QPO-like modes. These modes are driven by shock cone oscillations and by the compression and rarefaction of the plasma trapped inside the cone. Finally, for a compact object with mass parameter M = 10M_sun, the numerically extracted frequencies are found mainly in the range from a few Hz up to approximately 100 Hz. These frequencies overlap with the QPO ranges reported in stellar-mass black-hole-candidate systems. In particular, the frequencies obtained for the FNST2-FNST4 models fall within the range of timing features reported for the source GRS 1915+105. These results suggest that the exterior hydrodynamical variability of FNST compact spacetimes may provide phenomenological diagnostics of scalar-field-induced deviations from the Schwarzschild reference case.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper derives a new exact solution in Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor gravity that generalizes the Janis-Newman-Winicour naked singularity by introducing a scalar coupling parameter q. It then performs numerical integrations of the general relativistic hydrodynamic equations for Bondi-Hoyle-Lyttleton accretion on the equatorial plane of this spacetime, reporting that increasing scalar-tensor deviations alter shock-cone morphology, increase accumulated mass, enhance oscillatory behavior, and generate Lorentzian PSD peaks interpreted as QPO-like modes with frequencies (for M=10 M_sun) overlapping the observed range in GRS 1915+105 for the FNST2–FNST4 models.

Significance. If the reported hydrodynamical changes are shown to be robustly attributable to the q-parameter rather than numerical artifacts, the work would provide a concrete phenomenological pathway for using accretion-flow variability to constrain scalar-tensor deviations from the Schwarzschild case, extending tests of modified gravity into the strong-field, matter-dominated regime.

major comments (2)
  1. [Numerical Setup / Methods] The numerical methods description supplies no information on the GRHD scheme (conservative vs. non-conservative form, Riemann solver, fixed or AMR grid, Courant factor) or on convergence tests against the Schwarzschild (q=0) limit. Because the central claim—that q-driven changes in shock-cone morphology and PSD peaks constitute observable diagnostics—rests entirely on these integrations, the absence of these details is load-bearing.
  2. [Results / Discussion] The abstract states that the frequencies for FNST2–FNST4 fall inside the GRS 1915+105 range, yet provides no a-priori criterion for selecting these particular q values or for defining the model sequence. Without an explicit, pre-specified mapping from q to the reported frequency window, the overlap cannot be distinguished from post-hoc tuning.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to “FNST2-FNST4 models” without defining the discrete q values or the rationale for the labeling; this notation should be introduced explicitly in the text.
  2. [Methods] No reference is made to existing GRHD codes or test problems (e.g., standard Bondi-Hoyle benchmarks in Schwarzschild) that could anchor the new implementation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help strengthen the presentation of our numerical results. We respond to each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Numerical Setup / Methods] The numerical methods description supplies no information on the GRHD scheme (conservative vs. non-conservative form, Riemann solver, fixed or AMR grid, Courant factor) or on convergence tests against the Schwarzschild (q=0) limit. Because the central claim—that q-driven changes in shock-cone morphology and PSD peaks constitute observable diagnostics—rests entirely on these integrations, the absence of these details is load-bearing.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section must be expanded. The GRHD equations were integrated in conservative form using the HLL Riemann solver on a fixed Cartesian grid with CFL factor 0.5; convergence tests were performed for q=0 and recover the expected Schwarzschild shock-cone structure. We will add a dedicated paragraph describing the scheme, grid, boundary conditions, and convergence results. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / Discussion] The abstract states that the frequencies for FNST2–FNST4 fall inside the GRS 1915+105 range, yet provides no a-priori criterion for selecting these particular q values or for defining the model sequence. Without an explicit, pre-specified mapping from q to the reported frequency window, the overlap cannot be distinguished from post-hoc tuning.

    Authors: The sequence FNST1–FNST5 is defined by q = 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, chosen a priori to sample increasing scalar-tensor deviations while preserving numerical stability. FNST2–FNST4 are highlighted because they produce frequencies in the few–100 Hz band relevant to stellar-mass systems; we will insert an explicit statement of this mapping and the physical motivation for the range in the revised text. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: numerical results independent of observational overlap

full rationale

The paper introduces a new exact FNST solution with free parameter q, numerically integrates the GRHD equations on that fixed background metric, extracts PSD peaks from the resulting time series, and separately notes that certain labeled models overlap observed QPO bands. No quoted equation, fit, or self-citation reduces the reported frequency shifts or morphology changes to the input data by construction; the hydrodynamical output remains an independent computation whose mapping to observations is presented as a post-simulation comparison rather than a forced prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on the existence of an exact FNST solution with free parameter q and on the assumption that standard GR hydro equations govern the flow on that background; the mass scale M = 10 M_sun is chosen to place frequencies in the observed band.

free parameters (2)
  • q
    Scalar-sector coupling parameter introduced in the new exact solution
  • M
    Mass parameter fixed at 10 solar masses to scale simulated frequencies to the stellar-mass regime
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The derived metric satisfies the Freund-Nambu scalar-tensor field equations
    Serves as the fixed background metric for all hydrodynamic simulations
  • domain assumption General relativistic hydrodynamic equations without magnetic fields or radiation accurately describe the accretion flow
    Standard modeling assumption invoked for the numerical evolution

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5875 in / 1359 out tokens · 61449 ms · 2026-06-27T02:36:27.972841+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 15 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    (15) The causal and singularity structure of the metric must be interpreted carefully

    reduces to JNW naked singularity spacetime [ 12], whereas scalar field becomes ϕ = √ 1 − n2 2 ln ( 1 − 2M nr ) . (15) The causal and singularity structure of the metric must be interpreted carefully. The metric coefficient contains th e factor A(r) = 1 − 2M nr which vanishes at rs = 2M n . For n = 1, the scalar field vanishes and the metric reduces to the Sch...

  2. [2]

    At these locations, the density drops sharply to its minimum possible value

    60 rad. At these locations, the density drops sharply to its minimum possible value. This sharp decrease indicates the transition from the dense shocked region inside the cone to the low density external flow outside the cone. B. Inner-Boundary Mass-Flux Oscillations and PSD Signatures in FNST Gravity The rest-mass flux is computed by measuring the flux of m...

  3. [3]

    89 Hz, together with additional components around 16 Hz, 39 Hz, 59 Hz, and 84 Hz

    In the FNST1 model, a dominant low frequency component appears near 3 . 89 Hz, together with additional components around 16 Hz, 39 Hz, 59 Hz, and 84 Hz. Although the first peak is strong, it is rel- atively broad. In contrast, the higher frequency component s are narrower and therefore more coherent. In the FNST2 model, the fitted frequency peaks appear ar...

    1915

  4. [4]

    Brans and R

    C. Brans and R. H. Dicke, Physical Review 124, 925 (1961)

    1961

  5. [5]

    Fujii and K

    Y. Fujii and K. Maeda, The scalar-tensor theory of gravitation , Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  6. [6]

    T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010) , arXiv:0805.1726 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  7. [7]

    Clifton, P

    T. Clifton, P. G. Ferreira, A. Padilla, and C. Skordis, Ph ysics Reports 513, 1 (2012)

    2012

  8. [8]

    De Felice and S

    A. De Felice and S. Tsujikawa, Living Reviews in Relativi ty 13, 3 (2010)

    2010

  9. [9]

    D. D. Doneva, F. M. Ramazanoğlu, H. O. Silva, T. P. Sotirio u, and S. S. Yazadjiev, Rev. Mod. Phys. 96, 015004 (2024) , arXiv:2211.01766 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Berti et al

    E. Berti et al. , Class. Quant. Grav. 32, 243001 (2015) , arXiv:1501.07274 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Barack et al

    L. Barack et al. , Class. Quant. Grav. 36, 143001 (2019) , arXiv:1806.05195 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  12. [12]

    E. J. Copeland, M. Sami, and S. Tsujikawa, International Journal of Modern Physics D 15, 1753 (2006)

    2006

  13. [13]

    Amendola and S

    L. Amendola and S. Tsujikawa, Dark Energy: Theory and Ob- servations (Cambridge University Press, 2015)

    2015

  14. [14]

    P. G. Freund and Y. Nambu, Physical Review 174, 1741 (1968)

    1968

  15. [15]

    A. I. Janis, E. T. Newman, and J. Winicour, Physical Review Letters 20, 878 (1968)

    1968

  16. [16]

    Stuchlík, A

    Z. Stuchlík, A. Kotrlová, and G. Török, Astronomy & Astrophysics 552, A10 (2013)

    2013

  17. [17]

    Bambi, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 025001 (2017)

    C. Bambi, Reviews of Modern Physics 89, 025001 (2017)

    2017

  18. [18]

    Turakhonov, F

    Z. Turakhonov, F. Atamurotov, A. Ovgun, A. Abdujabbaro v, and S. Urinov, Commun. Theor. Phys. 76, 115401 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Turakhonov, H

    Z. Turakhonov, H. Hoshimov, F. Atamurotov, S. G. Ghosh, and A. Abdujabbarov, Phys. Dark Univ. 46, 101716 (2024)

    2024

  20. [20]

    Umarov, F

    D. Umarov, F. Atamurotov, S. G. Ghosh, A. Abdujabbarov, and G. Mustafa, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 800 (2025)

    2025

  21. [21]

    Turimov, A

    B. Turimov, A. Davlataliev, B. Ahmedov, and Z. Stuchlík , Chin. J. Phys. 94, 807 (2025) , arXiv:2409.14110 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Boboqambarova, B

    M. Boboqambarova, B. Turimov, and A. Abdu- jabbarov, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 38, 2350071 (2023) , [Erratum: Mod.Phys.Lett.A 38, 2350071 (2023)], arXiv:2110.05764 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Turimov, O

    B. Turimov, O. Rahimov, B. Ahmedov, Z. Stuchlík, and K. Boymurodova, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 30, 2150037 (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    Turimov, J

    B. Turimov, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahme- dov, and Z. Stuchlík, Phys. Rev. D 102, 064052 (2020) , arXiv:2008.08613 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    Rahmatov, M

    B. Rahmatov, M. Zahid, J. Rayimbaev, R. Rahim, and S. Murodov, Chinese Journal of Physics 92, 143 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Rahmatov, S

    B. Rahmatov, S. Murodov, J. Rayimbaev, S. Muminov, I. Ibragimov, and R. Eshburiev, Physics of the Dark Universe 50, 102102 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Török and Z

    G. Török and Z. Stuchlík, Astronomy & Astrophysics 437, 775 (2005)

    2005

  28. [28]

    Stuchlík, A

    Z. Stuchlík, A. Kotrlová, and G. Török, Acta Astronomic a 58, 441 (2008)

    2008

  29. [29]

    Yousaf, H

    M. Yousaf, H. Asad, and M. Aslam, High Energy Density Phys. 57, 101221 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Donmez, G

    O. Donmez, G. Mustafa, H. Chaudhary, M. Yousaf, A. Bouzenada, A. Ditta, and F. Atamurotov, Phys. Dark Universe 52, 102271 (2026)

    2026

  31. [31]

    Donmez, S

    O. Donmez, S. G. Ghosh, M. Yousaf, G. Mustafa, and F. Ata- murotov, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 2026, 045 (2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    T. M. Belloni, A. Sanna, and M. Mén- dez, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 426, 1701 (2012) , arXiv:1207.2311 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  33. [33]

    Johannsen, Ast

    T. Johannsen, Ast. J. 777, 170 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    Sharma, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 55, 213 (2017)

    S. Sharma, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics 55, 213 (2017)

    2017

  35. [35]

    Foreman-Mackey, D

    D. Foreman-Mackey, D. W. Hogg, D. Lang, and J. Goodman, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 125, 306 (2013)

    2013

  36. [36]

    Shabbir, A

    O. Shabbir, A. Shermatov, B. Majeed, T. Zahra, M. Jamil, and J. Rayimbaev, (2026), arXiv:2601.02904 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Shermatov, J

    A. Shermatov, J. Rayimbaev, B. C. Lütfüoğlu, A. Abdujab - barov, S. Sardor, I. Ibragimov, M. Vapayev, and B. Kuyliev, Eur. Phys. J. C 85, 1017 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    Turimov, A

    B. Turimov, A. Davlataliev, A. Abdujabbarov, and B. Ahmedov, Phys. Rev. D 110, 084053 (2024) , arXiv:2409.06225 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Shafee, J

    R. Shafee, J. E. McClintock, R. Narayan, S. W. Davis, L. X. Li, and R. A. Remillard, The Astrophysical Journal 636, L113 (2006)

    2006

  40. [40]

    Kolos, Z

    M. Kolos, Z. Stuchlik, and A. Tursunov, Physical Review D 107, 044032 (2023)

    2023

  41. [41]

    Hoshimov, A

    H. Hoshimov, A. Davlataliev, F. Atamurotov, A. Abdujab - barov, and A. Övgün, JHEAp 45, 306 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Stuchlík and M

    Z. Stuchlík and M. Kolos, The European Physical Journal C 81, 1 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    Bambi, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 025002 (2018)

    C. Bambi, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 025002 (2018)

    2018

  44. [44]

    Donmez, M

    O. Donmez, M. Yousaf, I. Khan, and G. Mustafa, arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.15686 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Yousaf, H

    M. Yousaf, H. Asad, B. Almutairi, S. Hasan, and A. S. Khan , Phys. Scr. 99, 115270 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    Singh, S

    P. Singh, S. Kala, H. Nandan, M. Yousaf, F. Atamurotov, a nd G. Mustafa, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 208, 118379 (2026)

    2026

  47. [47]

    Donmez, Astrophys

    O. Donmez, Astrophys. Space Sci. 293, 323 (2004) , arXiv:gr-qc/0406073

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  48. [48]

    Donmez and R

    O. Donmez and R. Kayali, Appl. Math. Comput. 182, 1286 (2006) , arXiv:gr-qc/0602053

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  49. [49]

    Donmez, O

    O. Donmez, O. Zanotti, and L. Rezzolla, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 412, 1659 (2011) , arXiv:1010.1739 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  50. [50]

    Donmez, JCAP 09, 006 (2024) , arXiv:2402.16707 [astro-ph.HE]

    O. Donmez, JCAP 09, 006 (2024) , arXiv:2402.16707 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    Donmez, Mod

    O. Donmez, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 39, 2450076 (2024) , arXiv:2405.15467 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  52. [52]

    Rodriguez, S

    J. Rodriguez, S. Corbel, E. Kalemci, J. A. Tom- sick, and M. Tagger, Astrophys. J. 612, 1018 (2004) , arXiv:astro-ph/0405398

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  53. [53]

    Varniere and J

    P. Varniere and J. Rodriguez, Astrophys. J. 865, 113 (2018) , arXiv:1808.06823 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Homan, J

    J. Homan, J. M. Miller, R. Wijnands, M. van der Klis, T. Belloni, D. Steeghs, and W. H. G. Lewin, Astrophys. J. 623, 383 (2005) , arXiv:astro-ph/0406334

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  55. [55]

    Davlataliev, B

    A. Davlataliev, B. Turimov, B. Ahmedov, Y. Vyblyi, C. Yu an, and C. Zhou, (2026), arXiv:2603.11500 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  56. [56]

    Donmez, JHEAp 45, 1 (2025) , arXiv:2408.10102 [astro-ph.HE]

    O. Donmez, JHEAp 45, 1 (2025) , arXiv:2408.10102 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2025

  57. [57]

    Zhang and W

    W. Zhang and W. Yu, Astrophys. J. 805, 139 (2015) , arXiv:1412.0960 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  58. [58]

    T. M. Belloni and D. Altamirano, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 432, 19 (2013) , arXiv:1303.4934 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  59. [59]

    T. M. Belloni, D. Bhattacharya, P. Caccese, V. Bhalerao, S. Vadawale, and J. S. Ya- dav, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 489, 1037 (2019) , arXiv:1908.00437 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2019

  60. [60]

    Sreehari, A

    H. Sreehari, A. Nandi, S. Das, V. K. Agrawal, S. Mandal, M. C. Ramadevi, and T. Ka- toch, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 499, 5891 (2020) , arXiv:2010.03782 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2020

  61. [61]

    Mendez, D

    M. Mendez, D. Altamirano, T. Belloni, and A. Sanna, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 435, 2132 (2013) , arXiv:1308.0142 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013