pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17176 · v1 · pith:72HOGZR7new · submitted 2026-06-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO · hep-ph

Tracing Ultra Light Axions in Post-reionization, Lyman-α and CMB Missions

Debarun Paul , Sourav Pal , Amit Dutta Banik , Supratik Pal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 02:30 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO hep-ph
keywords ultra light axionsdark matter21 cm intensity mappingLyman alpha forestCMB missionsFisher matrix forecastpost-reionization
0
0 comments X

The pith

A joint analysis of DESI-like Lyman-alpha, PUMA 21-cm and CMB-S4-like data projects an error of order 10^{-4} on the ultra-light axion fraction for masses below 10^{-28} eV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper forecasts the ability of upcoming cosmological surveys to constrain ultra-light axions, which are proposed to fix small-scale issues in standard cosmology. It examines how the quantum pressure from these axions suppresses the matter power spectrum in a mass-dependent way. Cross-correlating 21-cm intensity mapping from SKA1-MID and PUMA with DESI-like Lyman-alpha forest observations is used to reduce systematics. The analysis shows that combining these with CMB data can achieve tight constraints on the axion abundance at low masses, while LSS alone is optimal at intermediate masses.

Core claim

Utilizing the Fisher matrix on the cross-power spectrum between 21-cm intensity mapping and Lyman-alpha forest, along with CMB data, the projected uncertainty on the fractional ULA abundance reaches O(10^{-4}) for m_a ≲ 10^{-28} eV in a joint analysis, with best LSS sensitivity near m_a ~ 10^{-25} eV across 10^{-30} eV to 10^{-20} eV.

What carries the argument

Fisher matrix projections applied to the cross-correlation of post-reionization 21-cm intensity mapping and Lyman-alpha forest data, augmented by CMB observations.

Load-bearing premise

The projections assume that all instrumental, astrophysical, and modeling systematics are either negligible or can be perfectly marginalized without introducing biases in the cross-power spectra.

What would settle it

Detection of significant residual biases in the observed cross-power spectra between 21-cm and Lyman-alpha data that exceed the forecasted statistical errors would invalidate the projected constraints.

read the original abstract

Ultra-light axions (ULAs) are dark matter candidates proposed to resolve the small scale anomalies of the standard cosmological model. Due to their inherent quantum pressure, ULAs result in a distinct, scale-dependent suppression on the matter power spectrum, which can leave imprints on the upcoming observations. We explore such possibilities by forecasting on the post-reionization large scale structure (LSS) surveys and next-generation cosmic microwave background (CMB) missions. By utilizing the cross-correlation between 21-cm intensity mapping (SKA1-MID and PUMA) and the Lyman-$\alpha$ forest (DESI-like), we explore possible signatures of ULAs in post-reionization surveys while mitigating instrument-specific systematics. The Fisher matrix analysis projects uncertainties on the fractional ULA abundance across a wide ULA mass range of $10^{-30}\text{ eV} \le m_a \le 10^{-20}\text{ eV}$, revealing an optimal detection sensitivity at intermediate masses around $m_a \sim 10^{-25}\text{ eV}$. Furthermore, while next-generation CMB mission alone can yield small projected errors on the ULA fraction compared to future LSS missions, a joint analysis of the DESI-like and PUMA cross-spectrum alongside CMB-S4-like missions estimates an error on the ULA fraction to be $\mathcal{O}(10^{-4})$ for $m_a\lesssim 10^{-28}$ eV, highlighting a significant improvement over standalone LSS and CMB missions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript forecasts constraints on the fractional abundance of ultra-light axions (ULAs) as dark matter using future large-scale structure surveys. Specifically, it uses the cross-correlation between 21-cm intensity mapping (from SKA1-MID and PUMA) and the Lyman-α forest (DESI-like) to mitigate systematics, and combines this with CMB-S4-like missions. The key result is that the joint analysis can achieve an uncertainty of order 10^{-4} on the ULA fraction for masses m_a ≲ 10^{-28} eV, with optimal sensitivity at m_a ~ 10^{-25} eV.

Significance. If the assumptions in the Fisher matrix analysis hold, this work demonstrates the potential of multi-tracer post-reionization observations to probe ULA-induced suppression in the matter power spectrum at a level competitive with or better than CMB alone. It emphasizes the value of cross-correlations in reducing instrument-specific systematics for beyond-standard-model physics searches.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The headline result of an O(10^{-4}) error on the ULA fraction for m_a ≲ 10^{-28} eV from the joint DESI-like + PUMA + CMB-S4 analysis relies on the unvalidated assumption that the theoretical cross-power spectra match reality exactly after marginalizing nuisances, and that the covariance is known without bias. No mock validation or robustness tests against residual systematics (e.g., IGM thermal history, foreground leakage) are described, which is load-bearing for the quoted sensitivity.
  2. [Fisher matrix analysis] The paper does not discuss how post-hoc choices in the ULA mass grid or survey specifications affect the projected errors, leaving the numerical results potentially sensitive to these modeling decisions.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the exact definition of 'DESI-like' and 'CMB-S4-like' survey specifications used in the forecasts.
  2. The abstract mentions SKA1-MID but the key result focuses on PUMA; ensure consistency in the text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below, providing honest responses based on the scope of this forecast study.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The headline result of an O(10^{-4}) error on the ULA fraction for m_a ≲ 10^{-28} eV from the joint DESI-like + PUMA + CMB-S4 analysis relies on the unvalidated assumption that the theoretical cross-power spectra match reality exactly after marginalizing nuisances, and that the covariance is known without bias. No mock validation or robustness tests against residual systematics (e.g., IGM thermal history, foreground leakage) are described, which is load-bearing for the quoted sensitivity.

    Authors: We agree that the Fisher matrix formalism assumes the model matches the data after nuisance marginalization and that the covariance is known without bias. As this is a pure forecast paper focused on projected sensitivities from cross-correlations, we did not perform mock validations or explicit robustness tests against residual systematics such as IGM thermal history or foreground leakage. The cross-correlation is intended to reduce instrument-specific effects, but we acknowledge this is a limitation for interpreting the O(10^{-4}) figure. We will add a dedicated paragraph in the revised manuscript discussing these assumptions, the standard nature of Fisher forecasts in this context, and the need for future mock-based validation. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Fisher matrix analysis] The paper does not discuss how post-hoc choices in the ULA mass grid or survey specifications affect the projected errors, leaving the numerical results potentially sensitive to these modeling decisions.

    Authors: The ULA mass grid (10^{-30} to 10^{-20} eV) was selected to cover the full physically relevant range where suppression effects transition from large to small scales, with emphasis on the intermediate-mass peak near 10^{-25} eV where sensitivity is maximized due to the Jeans scale. Survey specifications follow published baselines for DESI, PUMA, SKA1-MID, and CMB-S4. While we did not include explicit sensitivity tests to variations in grid spacing or survey parameters, the results are presented as order-of-magnitude forecasts. We will add a short discussion in the methods or results section noting the rationale for these choices and that the optimal mass is driven by the underlying ULA physics rather than arbitrary binning. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Fisher matrix forecasts for ULA constraints are forward projections from external survey specs and fiducial cosmology, with no reduction to self-inputs.

full rationale

The paper's core results consist of Fisher-matrix error forecasts on the ULA fraction f_ULA derived from assumed DESI-like Lyα, PUMA 21 cm, SKA1-MID, and CMB-S4 specifications together with a standard theoretical model for scale-dependent suppression. These inputs are external (survey parameters, fiducial cosmology) rather than quantities fitted inside the paper and then re-predicted. No self-citation is invoked to establish uniqueness theorems or to smuggle ansatzes; the derivation chain therefore remains independent of its own outputs and is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The forecast rests on the standard linear perturbation theory for ULAs, the validity of the Fisher matrix approximation for parameter errors, and the assumption that the chosen cross-correlation observables capture the dominant ULA signal without unmodeled contaminants. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)
  • ULA mass grid
    The paper scans 10^{-30} to 10^{-20} eV but does not specify how the grid spacing or fiducial values are chosen; these choices affect the reported optimal mass.
  • Survey specifications
    Noise levels, sky coverage, and redshift ranges for SKA1-MID, PUMA, DESI-like, and CMB-S4 are taken as given inputs without derivation.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Linear perturbation theory accurately describes ULA suppression on the scales probed by the cross-spectra.
    Invoked implicitly when translating ULA mass to power-spectrum suppression for Fisher forecasting.
  • domain assumption Fisher matrix gives reliable parameter uncertainties for the chosen observables.
    Standard assumption in forecasting papers; no validation shown in abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5816 in / 1644 out tokens · 34577 ms · 2026-06-27T02:30:34.061931+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Bahcall, J.P

    N.A. Bahcall, J.P. Ostriker, S. Perlmutter and P.J. Steinhardt,The Cosmic triangle: Assessing the state of the universe,Science284(1999) 1481 [astro-ph/9906463]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  2. [2]

    Flores and J.R

    R.A. Flores and J.R. Primack,Observational and theoretical constraints on singular dark matter halos,Astrophys. J. Lett.427(1994) L1 [astro-ph/9402004]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  3. [3]

    Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature370(1994) 629

    B. Moore,Evidence against dissipationless dark matter from observations of galaxy haloes, Nature370(1994) 629

    1994

  4. [4]

    Moore, T.R

    B. Moore, T.R. Quinn, F. Governato, J. Stadel and G. Lake,Cold collapse and the core catastrophe,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.310(1999) 1147 [astro-ph/9903164]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  5. [5]

    Moore, S

    B. Moore, S. Ghigna, F. Governato, G. Lake, T.R. Quinn, J. Stadel et al.,Dark matter substructure within galactic halos,Astrophys. J. Lett.524(1999) L19 [astro-ph/9907411]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  6. [6]

    Klypin, A.V

    A.A. Klypin, A.V. Kravtsov, O. Valenzuela and F. Prada,Where are the missing Galactic satellites?,Astrophys. J.522(1999) 82 [astro-ph/9901240]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  7. [7]

    Boylan-Kolchin, J.S

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat,Too big to fail? The puzzling darkness of massive Milky Way subhaloes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.415(2011) L40 [1103.0007]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  8. [8]

    Boylan-Kolchin, J.S

    M. Boylan-Kolchin, J.S. Bullock and M. Kaplinghat,The Milky Way’s bright satellites as an apparent failure of LCDM,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.422(2012) 1203 [1111.2048]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  9. [9]

    Bauer, D.J.E

    J.B. Bauer, D.J.E. Marsh, R. Hloˇ zek, H. Padmanabhan and A. Lagu¨ e,Intensity Mapping as a Probe of Axion Dark Matter,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.500(2020) 3162 [2003.09655]

    arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Hlozek, D.J.E

    R. Hlozek, D.J.E. Marsh and D. Grin,Using the Full Power of the Cosmic Microwave Background to Probe Axion Dark Matter,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.476(2018) 3063 [1708.05681]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  11. [11]

    Hlozek, D

    R. Hlozek, D. Grin, D.J.E. Marsh and P.G. Ferreira,A search for ultralight axions using precision cosmological data,Phys. Rev. D91(2015) 103512 [1410.2896]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Marsh,Axion Cosmology,Phys

    D.J.E. Marsh,Axion Cosmology,Phys. Rept.643(2016) 1 [1510.07633]. – 21 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  13. [13]

    Hwang and H

    J.-c. Hwang and H. Noh,Axion as a Cold Dark Matter candidate,Phys. Lett. B680(2009) 1 [0902.4738]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  14. [14]

    Preskill, M.B

    J. Preskill, M.B. Wise and F. Wilczek,Cosmology of the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 127

    1983

  15. [15]

    Dine and W

    M. Dine and W. Fischler,The Not So Harmless Axion,Phys. Lett. B120(1983) 137

    1983

  16. [16]

    Abbott and P

    L.F. Abbott and P. Sikivie,A Cosmological Bound on the Invisible Axion,Phys. Lett. B120 (1983) 133

    1983

  17. [17]

    Sikivie,Axion Cosmology,Lect

    P. Sikivie,Axion Cosmology,Lect. Notes Phys.741(2008) 19 [astro-ph/0610440]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  18. [18]

    Blum and L

    K. Blum and L. Teodori,Gravitational lensing H0 tension from ultralight axion galactic cores, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) 123011 [2105.10873]

    arXiv 2021

  19. [19]

    Allali, M.P

    I.J. Allali, M.P. Hertzberg and F. Rompineve,Dark sector to restore cosmological concordance, Phys. Rev. D104(2021) L081303 [2104.12798]

    arXiv 2021

  20. [20]

    Lagu¨ e, J.R

    A. Lagu¨ e, J.R. Bond, R. Hloˇ zek, K.K. Rogers, D.J.E. Marsh and D. Grin,Constraining ultralight axions with galaxy surveys,JCAP01(2022) 049 [2104.07802]

    arXiv 2022

  21. [21]

    G. Ye, J. Zhang and Y.-S. Piao,Alleviating both H0 and S8 tensions: Early dark energy lifts the CMB-lockdown on ultralight axion,Phys. Lett. B839(2023) 137770 [2107.13391]

    arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Bull, P.G

    P. Bull, P.G. Ferreira, P. Patel and M.G. Santos,Late-time cosmology with 21cm intensity mapping experiments,Astrophys. J.803(2015) 21 [1405.1452]. [23]SKAcollaboration,Cosmology with Phase 1 of the Square Kilometre Array: Red Book 2018: Technical specifications and performance forecasts,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37(2020) e007 [1811.02743]. [24]Cosmic Vi...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  23. [23]

    McDonald and D

    P. McDonald and D. Eisenstein,Dark energy and curvature from a future baryonic acoustic oscillation survey using the Lyman-alpha forest,Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 063009 [astro-ph/0607122]. [26]DESIcollaboration,DESI 2024 VI: cosmological constraints from the measurements of baryon acoustic oscillations,JCAP02(2025) 021 [2404.03002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  24. [24]

    Dentler, D.J.E

    M. Dentler, D.J.E. Marsh, R. Hloˇ zek, A. Lagu¨ e, K.K. Rogers and D. Grin,Fuzzy dark matter and the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 data,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.515(2022) 5646 [2111.01199]

    arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Irˇ siˇ c, M

    V. Irˇ siˇ c, M. Viel, M.G. Haehnelt, J.S. Bolton and G.D. Becker,First constraints on fuzzy dark matter from Lyman-αforest data and hydrodynamical simulations,Phys. Rev. Lett.119(2017) 031302 [1703.04683]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  26. [26]

    Armengaud, N

    E. Armengaud, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C. Y` eche, D.J.E. Marsh and J. Baur,Constraining the mass of light bosonic dark matter using SDSS Lyman-αforest,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 471(2017) 4606 [1703.09126]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  27. [27]

    Rogers and H.V

    K.K. Rogers and H.V. Peiris,Strong Bound on Canonical Ultralight Axion Dark Matter from the Lyman-Alpha Forest,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 071302 [2007.12705]

    arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Kobayashi, R

    T. Kobayashi, R. Murgia, A. De Simone, V. Irˇ siˇ c and M. Viel,Lyman-αconstraints on ultralight scalar dark matter: Implications for the early and late universe,Phys. Rev. D96 (2017) 123514 [1708.00015]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  29. [29]

    J. Liu, Y. Gong and X. Zhou,Lyman-αforest constraints on pure and mixed fuzzy dark matter, 2606.06969. – 22 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  30. [30]

    Lazare, J

    H. Lazare, J. Flitter and E.D. Kovetz,Constraints on the fuzzy dark matter mass window from high-redshift observables,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 123532 [2407.19549]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Carucci, F

    I.P. Carucci, F. Villaescusa-Navarro and M. Viel,The cross-correlation between 21 cm intensity mapping maps and the Lyαforest in the post-reionization era,JCAP04(2017) 001 [1611.07527]. [35]CHIMEcollaboration,A Detection of Cosmological 21 cm Emission from CHIME in Cross-correlation with eBOSS Measurements of the LyαForest,Astrophys. J.963(2024) 23 [2309.04404]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Montero-Camacho, C

    P. Montero-Camacho, C. Morales-Guti´ errez, Y. Zhang, H. Long and Y. Mao,Reionization relics in the cross-correlation between the Lyαforest and 21 cm intensity mapping in the post-reionization era,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.536(2024) 1645 [2409.11613]

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Bhaumik, S

    A. Bhaumik, S. Pal and S. Pal,Primordial magnetic fields in the light of upcoming post-EoR Lyman-αand 21-cm observations,2604.07327

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  34. [34]

    Pal and S

    S. Pal and S. Pal,Neutrino self-interactions in post-reionization era: Lyman-α, 21-cm and cross-spectra,2604.15287

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Coble, S

    K. Coble, S. Dodelson and J.A. Frieman,Dynamical Lambda models of structure formation, Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 1851 [astro-ph/9608122]. [40]Planckcollaboration,Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters,Astron. Astrophys. 641(2020) A6 [1807.06209]. [41]eBOSScollaboration,Completed SDSS-IV extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Cosmological i...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  36. [36]

    Q. Liu, C. Feng and F.B. Abdalla,Improved constraints on ultralight axions using latest observations of the early and late Universe,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 043526 [2511.18917]

    arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Hloˇ zek, D.J.E

    R. Hloˇ zek, D.J.E. Marsh, D. Grin, R. Allison, J. Dunkley and E. Calabrese,Future CMB tests of dark matter: Ultralight axions and massive neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 123511 [1607.08208]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  38. [38]

    Smith, V

    T.L. Smith, V. Poulin and M.A. Amin,Oscillating scalar fields and the Hubble tension: a resolution with novel signatures,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 063523 [1908.06995]

    arXiv 2020

  39. [39]

    Cosmological implications of ultra-light axion-like fields

    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith, D. Grin, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Cosmological implications of ultralight axionlike fields,Phys. Rev. D98(2018) 083525 [1806.10608]. [46]CMB-S4collaboration, K.N. Abazajian et al.,CMB-S4 Science Book, First Edition, 10, 2016. 10.2172/1352047

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.2172/1352047 2018

  40. [40]

    Q. Yang, H. Yu and H. Di,Cosmic microwave background dipole asymmetry could be explained by axion monodromy cosmic strings,Phys. Dark Univ.26(2019) 100407 [1712.09917]

    arXiv 2019

  41. [41]

    Chadha-Day, J

    F. Chadha-Day, J. Ellis and D.J.E. Marsh,Axion dark matter: What is it and why now?,Sci. Adv.8(2022) abj3618 [2105.01406]

    arXiv 2022

  42. [42]

    O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

    C.A.J. O’Hare,Cosmology of axion dark matter,PoSCOSMICWISPers(2024) 040 [2403.17697]

    arXiv 2024

  43. [43]

    Kim and G

    J.E. Kim and G. Carosi,Axions and the Strong CP Problem,Rev. Mod. Phys.82(2010) 557 [0807.3125]

    arXiv 2010

  44. [44]

    Peccei,The Strong CP problem and axions,Lect

    R.D. Peccei,The Strong CP problem and axions,Lect. Notes Phys.741(2008) 3 [hep-ph/0607268]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  45. [45]

    Khlopov, B.A

    M.Y. Khlopov, B.A. Malomed, I.B. Zeldovich and Y.B. Zeldovich,Gravitational instability of scalar fields and formation of primordial black holes,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.215(1985) 575. – 23 –

    1985

  46. [46]

    Poulin, T.L

    V. Poulin, T.L. Smith, T. Karwal and M. Kamionkowski,Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.122(2019) 221301 [1811.04083]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Murgia, G.F

    R. Murgia, G.F. Abell’an and V. Poulin,Early dark energy resolution to the Hubble tension in light of weak lensing surveys and lensing anomalies,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 063502 [2009.10733]

    arXiv 2021

  48. [48]

    Norris, K

    R. Norris, K. Basu, M. Brown, E. Carretti, A.D. Kapinska, I. Prandoni et al.,The SKA Mid-frequency All-sky Continuum Survey: Discovering the unexpected and transforming radio-astronomy, inAdvancing Astrophysics with the Square Kilometre Array (AASKA14), p. 86, Apr., 2015, DOI [1412.6076]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  49. [49]

    Weltman et al.,Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array,Publ

    A. Weltman et al.,Fundamental physics with the Square Kilometre Array,Publ. Astron. Soc. Austral.37(2020) e002 [1810.02680]. [57]PUMAcollaboration,Packed Ultra-wideband Mapping Array (PUMA): A Radio Telescope for Cosmology and Transients,Bull. Am. Astron. Soc.51(2019) 53 [1907.12559]

    arXiv 2020

  50. [50]

    Castorina et al.,Packed Ultra-wideband Mapping Array (PUMA): Astro2020 RFI Response, 2002.05072

    E. Castorina et al.,Packed Ultra-wideband Mapping Array (PUMA): Astro2020 RFI Response, 2002.05072

    arXiv 2002

  51. [51]

    Karagiannis, J

    D. Karagiannis, J. Fonseca, R. Maartens and S. Camera,Probing primordial non-Gaussianity with the power spectrum and bispectrum of future 21 cm intensity maps,Phys. Dark Univ.32 (2021) 100821 [2010.07034]

    arXiv 2021

  52. [52]

    Sarkar, S

    D. Sarkar, S. Bharadwaj and S. Anathpindika,Modelling the post-reionization neutral hydrogen (H i ) bias,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.460(2016) 4310 [1605.02963]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  53. [53]

    Sarkar and S

    D. Sarkar and S. Bharadwaj,Modelling redshift space distortion in the post-reionization H i 21-cm power spectrum,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.476(2018) 96 [1801.07868]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    Arinyo-i Prats, J

    A. Arinyo-i Prats, J. Miralda-Escud´ e, M. Viel and R. Cen,The Non-Linear Power Spectrum of the Lyman Alpha Forest,JCAP12(2015) 017 [1506.04519]. [63]BOSScollaboration,The one-dimensional Ly-alpha forest power spectrum from BOSS,Astron. Astrophys.559(2013) A85 [1306.5896]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  55. [55]

    Sarkar, A.K

    A.K. Sarkar, A.K. Pal and T.G. Sarkar,Constraining warm dark matter power spectrum using the cross-correlation of HI 21 cm signal and the Lyman-αforest,JCAP12(2019) 058 [1907.10309]

    arXiv 2019

  56. [56]

    Dash and T.G

    C.B.V. Dash and T.G. Sarkar,Constraining dark energy using the cross correlations of weak lensing with post-reionization probes of neutral hydrogen,JCAP02(2021) 016 [2010.05816]

    arXiv 2021

  57. [57]

    Sarkar, S

    A.K. Sarkar, S. Bharadwaj and T.G. Sarkar,Predictions for measuring the cross power spectrum of the HI 21-cm signal and the Lyman-αforest using OWFA,JCAP05(2018) 051 [1804.00454]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  58. [58]

    Pal and T

    A.K. Pal and T. Guha Sarkar,Constraining neutrino mass using the large-scale H i distribution in the post-reionization epoch,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.459(2016) 3505 [1602.07893]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  59. [59]

    Guha Sarkar, S

    T. Guha Sarkar, S. Bharadwaj, T.R. Choudhury and K.K. Datta,Cross-correlation of the H I 21-cm signal and Lyαforest: a probe of cosmology,Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.410(2011) 1130 [1002.1368]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  60. [60]

    Tegmark, A

    M. Tegmark, A. Taylor and A. Heavens,Karhunen-Loeve eigenvalue problems in cosmology: How should we tackle large data sets?,Astrophys. J.480(1997) 22 [astro-ph/9603021]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  61. [61]

    Heavens,Statistical techniques in cosmology,arXiv e-prints(2009) arXiv:0906.0664 [0906.0664]

    A. Heavens,Statistical techniques in cosmology,arXiv e-prints(2009) arXiv:0906.0664 [0906.0664]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Bharadwaj, A.K

    S. Bharadwaj, A.K. Sarkar and S.S. Ali,Fisher matrix predictions for detecting the cosmological 21 cm signal with the Ooty Wide Field Array (OWFA),J. Astrophys. Astron.36 (2015) 385 [1510.01850]. – 24 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015