Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 minor 148 references

Cell sensing: from physical limits to active behaviors

T0 review · 0 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-27 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cells actively amplify, share, and prioritize sensory information to surpass passive physical limits.

desk verdict Review organizes active cell sensing into four categories with a clean structure but adds no new results or derivations. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.17239 v1 pith:P73JPGVH submitted 2026-06-15 physics.bio-ph

Andrew Mugler , Maria Rose This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.bio-ph
keywords cellsensingphysicallimitsactivebehaviorsinformationprocessingsignaldiscriminationcoordinationenvironmentalreshaping
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Physics determines the information content in signals that cells detect, setting fundamental bounds on precision for passive receivers. Cells, however, are active sensors that reshape both their surroundings and their own states. This review describes four active strategies—coordinating with neighboring cells, modifying the environment, dynamically updating internal states, and discriminating among signals—that let cells amplify, redistribute, share, and prioritize information. These behaviors often exceed or bypass the limits that would apply to passive sensing. The paper therefore frames cell sensing as an active process rather than a purely physical one.

What carries the argument

Four active sensing implementations—coordinating with other cells, reshaping the environment, dynamically updating themselves, and discriminating signals—that carry the argument by allowing cells to exceed passive limits.

What would settle it

An experiment in which disabling the four listed active mechanisms leaves cells unable to exceed the classic passive precision bounds would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

While physics sets the information contained in sensed signals, cells are active rather than passive sensors. They shape and reshape both the environment and themselves through coordination with other cells, environmental remodeling, internal state updates, and signal discrimination. These active behaviors enable amplification, redistribution, sharing, and prioritization of sensory information, often surpassing or obviating passive physical limits.

Load-bearing premise

Active cell behaviors genuinely exceed the information limits set by passive physics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Cell collectives can process and share information at scales larger than single-cell physics permits.
  • Dynamic internal updates let cells adapt their sensing to changing external conditions.
  • Signal discrimination allows prioritization of relevant inputs over noise.
  • Environmental reshaping can increase the effective information available to the cell.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Sensing models in biology should treat cells as feedback controllers rather than fixed detectors.
  • Synthetic circuits could be designed to replicate these active strategies for enhanced detection.
  • The same active principles may apply to other biological information-processing tasks such as chemotaxis or quorum sensing.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review that first outlines classic and recent physical limits on sensory precision in cells, then synthesizes literature on four classes of active cellular behaviors—coordinating with other cells, reshaping the environment, dynamically updating themselves, and discriminating signals—arguing that these allow amplification, redistribution, sharing, and prioritization of sensory information, often surpassing or obviating passive physical limits. It concludes with potential future directions.

Significance. If the synthesis of the cited primary studies holds, the review offers a coherent framework integrating physical constraints with active biological mechanisms in cell sensing. It explicitly credits the underlying empirical and theoretical results from the literature for establishing both the passive limits and the active circumventions.

minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'recent results' is used without indicating the temporal scope or selection criteria for the reviewed literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive review and recommendation to accept the manuscript. We are pleased that the synthesis of physical limits and active sensing strategies was viewed as coherent and appropriately crediting the underlying literature.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity

full rationale

This is a review paper that synthesizes existing literature on passive sensory limits and active cellular behaviors. No new derivations, equations, parameter fits, or predictions are introduced. The central framing—that active behaviors can surpass passive limits—is presented as a synthesis of cited primary studies rather than a self-derived result. No load-bearing steps reduce to self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or self-citation chains. The manuscript is self-contained against external benchmarks via the referenced works.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This is a review paper; the abstract introduces no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. All content summarizes prior literature on physical limits and active behaviors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Cell sensing: from physical limits to active behaviors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P73JPGVH

@misc{pith2026260617239,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Cell sensing: from physical limits to active behaviors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P73JPGVH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.17239}
}
read the original abstract

Physics sets the information contained in the signals that cells sense. But cells are active, not passive, sensors. They shape and reshape both the environment and themselves. These active behaviors allow cells to amplify, redistribute, share, and prioritize sensory information, often surpassing or obviating passive physical limits. Here, we review recent results on active sensing. After describing classic and more recent limits to sensory precision, we focus on four ways that cells implement active sensing: coordinating with other cells, reshaping their environment, dynamically updating themselves, and discriminating signals. We conclude with potential future directions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17239 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. The physics of environmental signals limits the information that can be passively sensed (left). Active behaviors, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Physical limits to sensing precision. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Organoid branching but not single-cell migration exhibits biased directional response to an EGF ligand gradient. (A) A schematic of the mesofluidic device chamber, with high (red) and low (pink) EGF concentration reservoirs and organoids embedded in a collagen gel exposed to the resulting EGF gradient (see Supporting Information for further information). (B) Example microscopy image of an organoid exposed to a 0.5-n… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Combined Effects and Compu transmembrane migration of MDA-MB-435Stransmembrane m [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Examples of reorientation and its simulation by computational model v.2. (A and B) Time-lapse images of MATa cells expressing in situ–tagged Ste2-GFP reorienting in mating mixtures. The fluorescent images show the localization of Ste2-GFP as MATa cells reorient. The fi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Latr tilTl atrunculin A–T between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Active sensing by dynamic updating. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Active sensing by signal discrimination. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

148 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    crownxlike

    (Fig. 4b), and a key result is a precision limit for the anisotropyAwhen degradation is weak, δA A ∼ 1 ga r c aDt(1 +β) ,(8) where c= s 4πDr0 (1−u 1β), g= s 4πDr 2 0 (1 +u 2β).(9) Here,r 0 is the separation between two mating cells,sis the pheromone secretion rate,β≪1 is a dimensionless parameter characterizing the strength of the degrading enzyme, andu 1...

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2520040123 1972

  2. [2]

    XUj8IJSZxTdJAPd5wlpIgZYcSAg=

    and deciding between two cell fates based on a mor- phogen concentration in embryogenesis [112]. The time required to reach a particular error threshold was found to be shorter than the time required to achieve an equiv- alent estimation error by fixed-time averaging, by factors of 2−3 [110] and 10 or more [112], respectively. Cells’ internal signaling ne...

    2024

  3. [3]

    or that poor information need not always correspond to poor migratory performance [135]. What will care- ful measurement of acquired information reveal in other organisms? Are eukaryotic cells, which sense chemical gradients spatially rather than temporally, similarly far from the physical limit? Active sensing requires energy. The energy require- ments f...

  4. [4]

    To what extent are other active matter phenomena altered or limited by sensory capabilities [144]? Sensing is a cell’s window to the world

    changes dramatically when the motile agents sense concentration gradients [143]. To what extent are other active matter phenomena altered or limited by sensory capabilities [144]? Sensing is a cell’s window to the world. It remains to be seen how broadly the physics of sensing shapes the biology of the cell. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was supported by Nati...

  5. [5]

    H. C. Berg and E. M. Purcell, Physics of chemorecep- tion, Biophysical journal20, 193 (1977)

    1977

  6. [6]

    Beroz, L

    F. Beroz, L. Jawerth, S. M¨ unster, D. Weitz, C. Broed- ersz, and N. Wingreen, Physical limits to biomechanical sensing in disordered fibre networks nat (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    Beroz, D

    F. Beroz, D. Zhou, X. Mao, and D. K. Lubensky, Phys- ical limits to sensing material properties, Nature com- munications11, 5170 (2020)

    2020

  8. [8]

    Mora and N

    T. Mora and N. S. Wingreen, Limits of sensing temporal concentration changes by single cells, Physical review letters104, 248101 (2010)

    2010

Show all 148 references
  1. [9]

    Mora and I

    T. Mora and I. Nemenman, Physical limit to concentra- tion sensing in a changing environment, Physical review letters123, 198101 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    B. A. Bicknell, P. Dayan, and G. J. Goodhill, The lim- its of chemosensation vary across dimensions, Nature communications6, 7468 (2015)

    2015

  3. [11]

    Gonz´ alez, H

    L. Gonz´ alez, H. Gwak, B. Han, and A. Mugler, Quan- tifying cellular autonomy in multicue environments, Physical Review Research7, 033068 (2025)

    2025

  4. [12]

    H. H. Mattingly, K. Kamino, B. B. Machta, and T. Emonet, Escherichia coli chemotaxis is information limited, Nature physics17, 1426 (2021)

    2021

  5. [13]

    H. H. Mattingly, K. Kamino, J. Ong, R. Kottou, T. Emonet, and B. B. Machta, E. coli chemosensing accuracy is not limited by stochastic molecule arrivals, Nature Physics , 1 (2026)

    2026

  6. [14]

    Bialek and S

    W. Bialek and S. Setayeshgar, Physical limits to biochemical signaling, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences102, 10040 (2005)

    2005

  7. [15]

    Bialek and S

    W. Bialek and S. Setayeshgar, Cooperativity, sensitiv- ity, and noise in biochemical signaling, Physical Review Letters100, 258101 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    R. G. Endres and N. S. Wingreen, Maximum likelihood and the single receptor, Physical review letters103, 158101 (2009)

    2009

  9. [17]

    Skoge, Y

    M. Skoge, Y. Meir, and N. S. Wingreen, Dynamics of cooperativity in chemical sensing among cell-surface re- ceptors, Physical review letters107, 178101 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Skoge, S

    M. Skoge, S. Naqvi, Y. Meir, and N. S. Wingreen, Chem- ical sensing by nonequilibrium cooperative receptors, Physical review letters110, 248102 (2013)

    2013

  11. [19]

    Kaizu, W

    K. Kaizu, W. De Ronde, J. Paijmans, K. Takahashi, F. Tostevin, and P. R. Ten Wolde, The berg-purcell limit revisited, Biophysical journal106, 976 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    R. G. Endres and N. S. Wingreen, Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences105, 15749 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    R. G. Endres and N. S. Wingreen, Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by cell-surface receptors, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology100, 33 (2009)

    2009

  14. [22]

    B. Hu, W. Chen, W.-J. Rappel, and H. Levine, Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients, Physical review letters105, 048104 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Mugler, A

    A. Mugler, A. Levchenko, and I. Nemenman, Limits to the precision of gradient sensing with spatial commu- nication and temporal integration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, E689 (2016)

    2016

  16. [24]

    P. J. Van Haastert and M. Postma, Biased random walk by stochastic fluctuations of chemoattractant-receptor interactions at the lower limit of detection, Biophysical journal93, 1787 (2007)

    2007

  17. [25]

    Varennes and A

    J. Varennes and A. Mugler, Sense and sensitivity: phys- ical limits to multicellular sensing, migration, and drug response, Molecular pharmaceutics13, 2224 (2016)

    2016

  18. [26]

    D. B. Dusenbery, Limits of thermal sensation, Journal of theoretical biology131, 263 (1988)

    1988

  19. [27]

    Vennettilli, S

    M. Vennettilli, S. Saha, U. Roy, and A. Mugler, Pre- cision of protein thermometry, Physical Review Letters 127, 098102 (2021)

    2021

  20. [28]

    Hurme, K

    R. Hurme, K. D. Berndt, S. J. Normark, and M. Rhen, A proteinaceous gene regulatory thermometer in salmonella, Cell90, 55 (1997)

    1997

  21. [29]

    G. S. Bakken and A. R. Krochmal, The imaging prop- erties and sensitivity of the facial pits of pitvipers as determined by optical and heat-transfer analysis, Jour- nal of Experimental Biology210, 2801 (2007)

    2007

  22. [30]

    E. O. Gracheva, N. T. Ingolia, Y. M. Kelly, J. F. Cordero-Morales, G. Hollopeter, A. T. Chesler, E. E. S´ anchez, J. C. Perez, J. S. Weissman, and D. Julius, Molecular basis of infrared detection by snakes, Nature 464, 1006 (2010). 12

    2010

  23. [31]

    I. R. Graf and B. B. Machta, A bifurcation integrates information from many noisy ion channels and allows for millikelvin thermal sensitivity in the snake pit organ, Biophysical Journal123, 325a (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Bouffanais, J

    R. Bouffanais, J. Sun, and D. K. Yue, Physical limits on cellular directional mechanosensing, Physical Review E—Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics87, 052716 (2013)

    2013

  25. [33]

    Ursell, J

    T. Ursell, J. Kondev, D. Reeves, P. A. Wiggins, and R. Phillips, Role of lipid bilayer mechanics in mechanosensation, inMechanosensitive Ion Channels (Springer, 2008) pp. 37–70

    2008

  26. [34]

    W. J. Polacheck, A. E. German, A. Mammoto, D. E. Ingber, and R. D. Kamm, Mechanotransduction of fluid stresses governs 3d cell migration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 2447 (2014)

    2014

  27. [35]

    Olesen, D

    S.-P. Olesen, D. Claphamt, and P. Davies, Haemody- namic shear stress activates a k+ current in vascular endothelial cells, Nature331, 168 (1988)

    1988

  28. [36]

    D´ ecav´ e, D

    E. D´ ecav´ e, D. Rieu, J. Dalous, S. Fache, Y. Br´ echet, B. Fourcade, M. Satre, and F. Bruckert, Shear flow- induced motility of dictyostelium discoideum cells on solid substrate, Journal of cell science116, 4331 (2003)

    2003

  29. [37]

    Makino, E

    A. Makino, E. R. Prossnitz, M. B¨ unemann, J. M. Wang, W. Yao, and G. W. Schmid-Sch¨ onbein, G protein-coupled receptors serve as mechanosensors for fluid shear stress in neutrophils, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology290, C1633 (2006)

    2006

  30. [38]

    J. Y. Park, S. J. Yoo, L. Patel, S. H. Lee, and S.-H. Lee, Cell morphological response to low shear stress in a two-dimensional culture microsystem with magnitudes comparable to interstitial shear stress, Biorheology47, 165 (2010)

    2010

  31. [39]

    W. J. Polacheck, J. L. Charest, and R. D. Kamm, Inter- stitial flow influences direction of tumor cell migration through competing mechanisms, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences108, 11115 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    McLaughlin and M

    S. McLaughlin and M. Poo, The role of electro-osmosis in the electric-field-induced movement of charged macromolecules on the surfaces of cells, Biophysical journal34, 85 (1981)

    1981

  33. [41]

    M. J. Brown and L. M. Loew, Electric field-directed fibroblast locomotion involves cell surface molecular re- organization and is calcium independent., The Journal of cell biology127, 117 (1994)

    1994

  34. [42]

    G. M. Allen, A. Mogilner, and J. A. Theriot, Elec- trophoresis of cellular membrane components creates the directional cue guiding keratocyte galvanotaxis, Current Biology23, 560 (2013)

    2013

  35. [43]

    B. M. Kobylkevich, A. Sarkar, B. R. Carlberg, L. Huang, S. Ranjit, D. M. Graham, and M. A. Messerli, Reversing the direction of galvanotaxis with controlled increases in boundary layer viscosity, Physical biology15, 036005 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Sarkar, B

    A. Sarkar, B. M. Kobylkevich, D. M. Graham, and M. A. Messerli, Electromigration of cell surface macro- molecules in dc electric fields during cell polarization and galvanotaxis, Journal of theoretical biology478, 58 (2019)

    2019

  37. [45]

    Nwogbaga, A

    I. Nwogbaga, A. H. Kim, and B. A. Camley, Physical limits on galvanotaxis, Physical Review E108, 064411 (2023)

    2023

  38. [46]

    K. V. Mardia and P. E. Jupp,Directional statistics (John Wiley & Sons, 2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Ellison, A

    D. Ellison, A. Mugler, M. D. Brennan, S. H. Lee, R. J. Huebner, E. R. Shamir, L. A. Woo, J. Kim, P. Amar, I. Nemenman, A. J. Ewald, and A. Levchenko, Cell–cell communication enhances the capacity of cell ensembles to sense shallow gradients during morphogenesis, Pro- ceedings ...

    2016

  40. [48]

    Malet-Engra, W

    G. Malet-Engra, W. Yu, A. Oldani, J. Rey-Barroso, N. S. Gov, G. Scita, and L. Dupr´ e, Collective cell motility promotes chemotactic prowess and resistance to chemorepulsion, Current Biology25, 242 (2015)

    2015

  41. [49]

    Fancher and A

    S. Fancher and A. Mugler, Fundamental limits to collec- tive concentration sensing in cell populations, Physical review letters118, 078101 (2017)

    2017

  42. [50]

    Kravchenko-Balasha, J

    N. Kravchenko-Balasha, J. Wang, F. Remacle, R. D. Levine, and J. R. Heath, Glioblastoma cellular architec- tures are predicted through the characterization of two- cell interactions, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 6521 (2014)

    2014

  43. [51]

    Gregor, D

    T. Gregor, D. W. Tank, E. F. Wieschaus, and W. Bialek, Probing the limits to positional information, Cell130, 153 (2007)

    2007

  44. [52]

    Erdmann, M

    T. Erdmann, M. Howard, and P. R. Ten Wolde, Role of spatial averaging in the precision of gene expression patterns, Physical review letters103, 258101 (2009)

    2009

  45. [53]

    Fancher and A

    S. Fancher and A. Mugler, Diffusion vs. direct transport in the precision of morphogen readout, Elife9, e58981 (2020)

    2020

  46. [54]

    W. J. Rosoff, J. S. Urbach, M. A. Esrick, R. G. McAllis- ter, L. J. Richards, and G. J. Goodhill, A new chemo- taxis assay shows the extreme sensitivity of axons to molecular gradients, Nature neuroscience7, 678 (2004)

    2004

  47. [55]

    Theveneau, L

    E. Theveneau, L. Marchant, S. Kuriyama, M. Gull, B. Moepps, M. Parsons, and R. Mayor, Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity, De- velopmental cell19, 39 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    D. Cai, W. Dai, M. Prasad, J. Luo, N. S. Gov, and D. J. Montell, Modeling and analysis of collective cell migration in an in vivo three-dimensional environment, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences113, E2134 (2016)

    2016

  49. [57]

    Haeger, K

    A. Haeger, K. Wolf, M. M. Zegers, and P. Friedl, Collec- tive cell migration: guidance principles and hierarchies, Trends in cell biology25, 556 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    Varennes, B

    J. Varennes, B. Han, and A. Mugler, Collective chemo- taxis through noisy multicellular gradient sensing, Bio- physical journal111, 640 (2016)

    2016

  51. [59]

    Camley, J

    B. Camley, J. Zimmermann, H. Levine, and W.-J. Rap- pel, Emergent collective chemotaxis without single-cell gradient sensing, Biophysical Journal110, 306a (2016)

    2016

  52. [60]

    B. A. Camley, J. Zimmermann, H. Levine, and W.-J. Rappel, Collective signal processing in cluster chemo- taxis: Roles of adaptation, amplification, and co- attraction in collective guidance, PLoS computational biology12, e1005008 (2016)

    2016

  53. [61]

    Varennes, S

    J. Varennes, S. Fancher, B. Han, and A. Mugler, Emer- gent versus individual-based multicellular chemotaxis, Physical review letters119, 188101 (2017)

    2017

  54. [62]

    B. A. Camley and W.-J. Rappel, Cell-to-cell variation sets a tissue-rheology–dependent bound on collective gradient sensing, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, E10074 (2017)

    2017

  55. [63]

    B. A. Camley, Collective gradient sensing and chemo- taxis: modeling and recent developments, Journal of 13 Physics: Condensed Matter30, 223001 (2018)

    2018

  56. [64]

    B. A. Camley and W.-J. Rappel, Physical models of collective cell motility: from cell to tissue, Journal of physics D: Applied physics50, 113002 (2017)

    2017

  57. [65]

    Carmona-Fontaine, E

    C. Carmona-Fontaine, E. Theveneau, A. Tzekou, M. Tada, M. Woods, K. M. Page, M. Parsons, J. D. Lambris, and R. Mayor, Complement fragment c3a con- trols mutual cell attraction during collective cell migra- tion, Developmental cell21, 1026 (2011)

    2011

  58. [66]

    E. O. Budrene and H. C. Berg, Complex patterns formed by motile cells of escherichia coli, Nature349, 630 (1991)

    1991

  59. [67]

    Z. Long, B. Quaife, H. Salman, and Z. N. Oltvai, Cell- cell communication enhances bacterial chemotaxis to- ward external attractants, Scientific reports7, 12855 (2017)

    2017

  60. [68]

    S. Saha, S. Fancher, and A. Mugler, Effects of cell-cell communication on bacterial chemotaxis, Physics Review E (2026)

    2026

  61. [69]

    Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria: Motile escherichia coli migrate in bands that are influenced by oxygen and or- ganic nutrients., Science153, 708 (1966)

    J. Adler, Chemotaxis in bacteria: Motile escherichia coli migrate in bands that are influenced by oxygen and or- ganic nutrients., Science153, 708 (1966)

    1966

  62. [70]

    E. F. Keller and L. A. Segel, Traveling bands of chemo- tactic bacteria: a theoretical analysis, Journal of theo- retical biology30, 235 (1971)

    1971

  63. [71]

    Saragosti, V

    J. Saragosti, V. Calvez, N. Bournaveas, B. Perthame, A. Buguin, and P. Silberzan, Directional persistence of chemotactic bacteria in a traveling concentration wave, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences108, 16235 (2011)

    2011

  64. [72]

    X. Fu, S. Kato, J. Long, H. H. Mattingly, C. He, D. C. Vural, S. W. Zucker, and T. Emonet, Spatial self-organization resolves conflicts between individual- ity and collective migration, Nature communications9, 2177 (2018)

    2018

  65. [73]

    Mart´ ınez-Calvo, T

    A. Mart´ ınez-Calvo, T. Bhattacharjee, R. K. Bay, H. N. Luu, A. M. Hancock, N. S. Wingreen, and S. S. Datta, Morphological instability and roughening of growing 3d bacterial colonies, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2208019119 (2022)

    2022

  66. [74]

    Tweedy, O

    L. Tweedy, O. Susanto, and R. H. Insall, Self-generated chemotactic gradients—cells steering themselves, Cur- rent opinion in cell biology42, 46 (2016)

    2016

  67. [75]

    Scherber, A

    C. Scherber, A. J. Aranyosi, B. Kulemann, S. P. Thayer, M. Toner, O. Iliopoulos, and D. Irimia, Epithelial cell guidance by self-generated egf gradients, Integrative Bi- ology4, 259 (2012)

    2012

  68. [76]

    M. C. U¸ car, Z. Alsberga, J. Alanko, M. Sixt, and E. Hannezo, Self-generated chemotaxis of mixed cell populations, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2504064122 (2025)

    2025

  69. [77]

    A. J. Muinonen-Martin, O. Susanto, Q. Zhang, E. Smethurst, W. J. Faller, D. M. Veltman, G. Kalna, C. Lindsay, D. C. Bennett, O. J. Sansom,et al., Melanoma cells break down lpa to establish local gradi- ents that drive chemotactic dispersal, PLoS biology12, e1001966 (2014)

    2014

  70. [78]

    Don` a, J

    E. Don` a, J. D. Barry, G. Valentin, C. Quirin, A. Khmelinskii, A. Kunze, S. Durdu, L. R. Newton, A. Fernandez-Minan, W. Huber,et al., Directional tis- sue migration through a self-generated chemokine gra- dient, Nature503, 285 (2013)

    2013

  71. [79]

    Irannejad, N

    R. Irannejad, N. G. Tsvetanova, B. T. Lobingier, and M. Von Zastrow, Effects of endocytosis on receptor- mediated signaling, Current opinion in cell biology35, 137 (2015)

    2015

  72. [80]

    L. J. Mutch, J. D. Howden, E. P. L. Jenner, N. S. Poul- ter, and J. Z. Rappoport, Polarised clathrin-mediated endocytosis of egfr during chemotactic invasion, Traffic 15, 648 (2014)

    2014

  73. [81]

    Pinilla-Macua and A

    I. Pinilla-Macua and A. Sorkin, Cbl and cbl-b indepen- dently regulate egfr through distinct receptor interac- tion modes, Molecular Biology of the Cell34, ar134 (2023)

    2023

  74. [82]

    Assaker, D

    G. Assaker, D. Ramel, S. K. Wculek, M. Gonz´ alez- Gait´ an, and G. Emery, Spatial restriction of receptor tyrosine kinase activity through a polarized endocytic cycle controls border cell migration, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 22558 (2010)

    2010

  75. [83]

    G. L. Garcia, E. C. Rericha, C. D. Heger, P. K. Gold- smith, and C. A. Parent, The group migration of dic- tyostelium cells is regulated by extracellular chemoat- tractant degradation, Molecular biology of the cell20, 3295 (2009)

    2009

  76. [84]

    M. Jin, B. Errede, M. Behar, W. Mather, S. Nayak, J. Hasty, H. G. Dohlman, and T. C. Elston, Yeast dy- namically modify their environment to achieve better mating efficiency, Science signaling4, ra54 (2011)

    2011

  77. [85]

    R. K. Chan and C. A. Otte, Physiological characteriza- tion of saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants supersensitive to g1 arrest by a factor andαfactor pheromones, Molec- ular and cellular biology2, 21 (1982)

    1982

  78. [86]

    C. L. Jackson and L. H. Hartwell, Courtship in s. cere- visiae: both cell types choose mating partners by re- sponding to the strongest pheromone signal, Cell63, 1039 (1990)

    1990

  79. [87]

    K. C. Jacobs, O. Gorman, and D. J. Lew, Mechanism of commitment to a mating partner in saccharomyces cere- visiae, Molecular Biology of the Cell33, ar112 (2022)

    2022

  80. [88]

    X. Wang, W. Tian, B. T. Banh, B.-M. Statler, J. Liang, and D. E. Stone, Mating yeast cells use an intrinsic po- larity site to assemble a pheromone-gradient tracking machine, Journal of Cell Biology218, 3730 (2019)

    2019

  81. [89]

    LeFebre, J

    R. LeFebre, J. A. Landsittel, D. E. Stone, and A. Mugler, Role of signal degradation in directional chemosensing, Physical Review Letters133, 138402 (2024)

    2024

  82. [90]

    J. D. Shields, M. E. Fleury, C. Yong, A. A. Tomei, G. J. Randolph, and M. A. Swartz, Autologous chemotaxis as a mechanism of tumor cell homing to lymphatics via interstitial flow and autocrine ccr7 signaling, Cancer cell 11, 526 (2007)

    2007

  83. [91]

    Barkai, M

    N. Barkai, M. D. Rose, and N. S. Wingreen, Pro- tease helps yeast find mating partners, Nature396, 422 (1998)

    1998

  84. [92]

    S. S. Andrews, N. J. Addy, R. Brent, and A. P. Arkin, Detailed simulations of cell biology with smoldyn 2.1, PLoS computational biology6, e1000705 (2010)

    2010

  85. [93]

    Lakhani and T

    V. Lakhani and T. C. Elston, Testing the limits of gradi- ent sensing, PLoS computational biology13, e1005386 (2017)

    2017

  86. [94]

    Barrios, A

    J. Barrios, A. Goetz, S. E. Leggett, and P. D. Dixit, Endocytosis shapes extracellular chemical gradients in autonomous cell-cell attraction, bioRxiv , 2026 (2026)

    2026

  87. [95]

    Wartlick, A

    O. Wartlick, A. Kicheva, and M. Gonz´ alez-Gait´ an, Mor- phogen gradient formation, Cold Spring Harbor per- spectives in biology1, a001255 (2009). 14

    2009

  88. [96]

    Gregor, E

    T. Gregor, E. F. Wieschaus, A. P. McGregor, W. Bialek, and D. W. Tank, Stability and nuclear dynamics of the bicoid morphogen gradient, Cell130, 141 (2007)

    2007

  89. [97]

    J. M. Munson, R. V. Bellamkonda, and M. A. Swartz, Interstitial flow in a 3d microenvironment increases glioma invasion by a cxcr4-dependent mechanism, Can- cer research73, 1536 (2013)

    2013

  90. [98]

    M. E. Fleury, K. C. Boardman, and M. A. Swartz, Au- tologous morphogen gradients by subtle interstitial flow and matrix interactions, Biophysical journal91, 113 (2006)

    2006

  91. [99]

    Fancher, M

    S. Fancher, M. Vennettilli, N. Hilgert, and A. Mugler, Precision of flow sensing by self-communicating cells, Physical review letters124, 168101 (2020)

    2020

  92. [100]

    A. S. Khair, Two-cell interactions in autologous chemo- taxis, Physical Review E104, 024404 (2021)

    2021

  93. [101]

    Vennettilli, L

    M. Vennettilli, L. Gonz´ alez, N. Hilgert, and A. Mugler, Autologous chemotaxis at high cell density, Physical Re- view E106, 024413 (2022)

    2022

  94. [102]

    Ben-Ami, J

    Y. Ben-Ami, J. M. Pitt-Francis, P. K. Maini, and H. M. Byrne, Using a probabilistic approach to derive a two- phase model of flow-induced cell migration, Biophysical Journal123, 799 (2024)

    2024

  95. [103]

    Gonz´ alez and A

    L. Gonz´ alez and A. Mugler, Collective effects in flow- driven cell migration, Physical Review E108, 054406 (2023)

    2023

  96. [104]

    S. R. Chary and R. K. Jain, Direct measurement of in- terstitial convection and diffusion of albumin in normal and neoplastic tissues by fluorescence photobleaching., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences86, 5385 (1989)

    1989

  97. [105]

    S. M. Block, J. E. Segall, and H. C. Berg, Impulse re- sponses in bacterial chemotaxis, Cell31, 215 (1982)

    1982

  98. [106]

    J. E. Segall, S. M. Block, and H. C. Berg, Temporal comparisons in bacterial chemotaxis., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences83, 8987 (1986)

    1986

  99. [107]

    Celani and M

    A. Celani and M. Vergassola, Bacterial strategies for chemotaxis response, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 1391 (2010)

    2010

  100. [108]

    H. C. Berg and D. A. Brown, Chemotaxis in escherichia coli analysed by three-dimensional tracking, nature239, 500 (1972)

    1972

  101. [109]

    C. A. Parent and P. N. Devreotes, A cell’s sense of di- rection, Science284, 765 (1999)

    1999

  102. [110]

    Du and Z

    M. Du and Z. J. Chen, Dna-induced liquid phase con- densation of cgas activates innate immune signaling, Science361, 704 (2018)

    2018

  103. [111]

    Alston, M

    H. Alston, M. Rouches, A. Murugan, A. M. Walczak, and T. Mora, Theoretical limits for sensing through phase separation, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences123, e2520040123 (2026)

    2026

  104. [112]

    J. Rode, M. Novak, and B. M. Friedrich, Information theory of chemotactic agents using both spatial and temporal gradient sensing, PRX Life2, 023012 (2024)

    2024

  105. [113]

    Alonso and J

    A. Alonso and J. B. Kirkegaard, Learning optimal in- tegration of spatial and temporal information in noisy chemotaxis, PNAS nexus3, pgae235 (2024)

    2024

  106. [114]

    E. D. Siggia and M. Vergassola, Decisions on the fly in cellular sensory systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences110, E3704 (2013)

    2013

  107. [115]

    Wald, Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses, An- nals of Mathematical Statistics16, 117 (1945)

    A. Wald, Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses, An- nals of Mathematical Statistics16, 117 (1945)

    1945

  108. [116]

    Desponds, M

    J. Desponds, M. Vergassola, and A. M. Walczak, A mechanism for hunchback promoters to readout mor- phogenetic positional information in less than a minute, Elife9, e49758 (2020)

    2020

  109. [117]

    C. C. Govern and P. R. ten Wolde, Fundamental lim- its on sensing chemical concentrations with linear bio- chemical networks, Physical review letters109, 218103 (2012)

    2012

  110. [118]

    Iyer-Biswas and A

    S. Iyer-Biswas and A. Zilman, First-passage processes in cellular biology, Advances in chemical physics160, 261 (2016)

    2016

  111. [119]

    K. R. Ghusinga, J. J. Dennehy, and A. Singh, First- passage time approach to controlling noise in the tim- ing of intracellular events, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences114, 693 (2017)

    2017

  112. [120]

    Gupta, J

    S. Gupta, J. Varennes, H. C. Korswagen, and A. Mugler, Temporal precision of regulated gene expression, PLoS computational biology14, e1006201 (2018)

    2018

  113. [121]

    Tu, Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation, Annual review of biophysics42, 337 (2013)

    Y. Tu, Quantitative modeling of bacterial chemotaxis: signal amplification and accurate adaptation, Annual review of biophysics42, 337 (2013)

    2013

  114. [122]

    W. Ma, A. Trusina, H. El-Samad, W. A. Lim, and C. Tang, Defining network topologies that can achieve biochemical adaptation, Cell138, 760 (2009)

    2009

  115. [123]

    J. E. Ferrell, Perfect and near-perfect adaptation in cell signaling, Cell systems2, 62 (2016)

    2016

  116. [124]

    M. H. Khammash, Perfect adaptation in biology, Cell Systems12, 509 (2021)

    2021

  117. [125]

    Goetz and P

    A. Goetz and P. Dixit, Emergent eukaryotic directional sensing via receptor degradation and diffusion, Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences122, e2516077122 (2025)

    2025

  118. [126]

    D. Wu, S. Mao, and J. Lin, Optimal distributions of receptors on arbitrarily shaped cell surfaces, Physical Review Letters135, 208401 (2025)

    2025

  119. [127]

    Alonso, R

    A. Alonso, R. G. Endres, and J. B. Kirkegaard, Local clustering and global spreading of receptors for optimal spatial gradient sensing, Physical Review Letters134, 158401 (2025)

    2025

  120. [128]

    C. P. Brangwynne, C. R. Eckmann, D. S. Courson, A. Rybarska, C. Hoege, J. Gharakhani, F. J¨ ulicher, and A. A. Hyman, Germline p granules are liquid droplets that localize by controlled dissolution/condensation, Science324, 1729 (2009)

    2009

  121. [129]

    Sengupta, B

    P. Sengupta, B. Baird, and D. Holowka, Lipid rafts, fluid/fluid phase separation, and their relevance to plasma membrane structure and function, inSeminars in cell & developmental biology, Vol. 18 (Elsevier, 2007) pp. 583–590

    2007

  122. [130]

    A. A. Hyman, C. A. Weber, and F. J¨ ulicher, Liquid- liquid phase separation in biology, Annual review of cell and developmental biology30, 39 (2014)

    2014

  123. [131]

    Mora, Physical limit to concentration sensing amid spurious ligands, Physical review letters115, 038102 (2015)

    T. Mora, Physical limit to concentration sensing amid spurious ligands, Physical review letters115, 038102 (2015)

    2015

  124. [132]

    J. J. Hopfield, Kinetic proofreading: a new mechanism for reducing errors in biosynthetic processes requiring high specificity, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences71, 4135 (1974)

    1974

  125. [133]

    de Ronde, F

    W. de Ronde, F. Tostevin, and P. R. Ten Wolde, Multi- plexing biochemical signals, Physical review letters107, 048101 (2011)

    2011

  126. [134]

    Singh and I

    V. Singh and I. Nemenman, Simple biochemical net- works allow accurate sensing of multiple ligands with a single receptor, PLoS computational biology13, e1005490 (2017). 15

    2017

  127. [135]

    H.-r. Moon, S. Saha, A. Mugler, and B. Han, Signal pro- cessing capacity of the cellular sensory machinery reg- ulates the accuracy of chemotaxis under complex cues, Iscience24(2021)

    2021

  128. [136]

    Saha, H.-r

    S. Saha, H.-r. Moon, B. Han, and A. Mugler, Deduction of signaling mechanisms from cellular responses to mul- tiple cues, npj Systems Biology and Applications8, 48 (2022)

    2022

  129. [137]

    B. Lin, T. Yin, Y. I. Wu, T. Inoue, and A. Levchenko, Interplay between chemotaxis and contact inhibition of locomotion determines exploratory cell migration, Na- ture communications6, 6619 (2015)

    2015

  130. [138]

    Wang and B

    W. Wang and B. A. Camley, Limits on the accuracy of contact inhibition of locomotion, Physical Review E 109, 054408 (2024)

    2024

  131. [139]

    R. G. Endres, Robust chemotaxis beyond sensing limits: signal, noise, and strategy, Physical Biology23, 036003 (2026)

    2026

  132. [140]

    C. C. Govern and P. R. Ten Wolde, Optimal resource allocation in cellular sensing systems, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111, 17486 (2014)

    2014

  133. [141]

    C. C. Govern and P. R. ten Wolde, Energy dissipa- tion and noise correlations in biochemical sensing, Phys. Rev. Lett113, 258102 (2014)

    2014

  134. [142]

    G. Lan, P. Sartori, S. Neumann, V. Sourjik, and Y. Tu, The energy–speed–accuracy trade-off in sensory adap- tation, Nature physics8, 422 (2012)

    2012

  135. [143]

    S. J. Bryant and B. B. Machta, Physical constraints in intracellular signaling: the cost of sending a bit, Physi- cal review letters131, 068401 (2023)

    2023

  136. [144]

    Trifonova, M

    K. Trifonova, M. J. Falk, M. Rouches, S. Vaikun- tanathan, M. Elowitz, and A. Murugan, Trainable com- putation in molecular networks, BioRxiv (2025)

    2025

  137. [145]

    Floyd, A

    C. Floyd, A. R. Dinner, A. Murugan, and S. Vaikun- tanathan, Limits on the computational expressivity of non-equilibrium biophysical processes, Nature Commu- nications16, 7184 (2025)

    2025

  138. [146]

    M. E. Cates and J. Tailleur, Motility-induced phase separation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.6, 219 (2015)

    2015

  139. [147]

    H. Zhao, A. Koˇ smrlj, and S. S. Datta, Chemotactic motility-induced phase separation, Physical review let- ters131, 118301 (2023)

    2023

  140. [148]

    Ziepke, I

    A. Ziepke, I. Maryshev, I. S. Aranson, and E. Frey, Multi-scale organization in communicating active mat- ter, Nature communications13, 6727 (2022)

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed June 27, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.