pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.17413 · v1 · pith:QZDTRSS7new · submitted 2026-06-16 · 💻 cs.LG · stat.AP

Amortized Probabilistic Retrieval of Atmospheric CO2 from OCO-2 Spectra Using Deep Learning with Laplace Approximations and Normalizing Flows

Alejandro Calle-Saldarriaga , Felix Jimenez , Jack Grosskreuz , Jiazheng Wang , Jonathan Hobbs , Matthias Katzfuss This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 01:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG stat.AP
keywords atmospheric CO2 retrievalOCO-2deep learningnormalizing flowsLaplace approximationuncertainty quantificationsatellite remote sensingamortized inference
0
0 comments X

The pith

Deep learning with Laplace approximations and normalizing flows amortizes OCO-2 CO2 retrieval while capturing non-Gaussian posteriors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a deep learning framework to estimate column-averaged CO2 from high-resolution spectra measured by NASA's OCO-2 satellite. Traditional operational methods are computationally expensive and assume Gaussian uncertainties, but this approach trains a multi-branch neural network on simulated data that includes realistic model errors. It then uses Laplace approximations or normalizing flows to produce posterior distributions over CO2 levels or summaries. If correct, this yields inference that is orders of magnitude faster while also improving accuracy, calibration, and the ability to capture asymmetric uncertainties. A sympathetic reader would care because faster and more reliable CO2 monitoring supports better constraints on the global carbon budget.

Core claim

The authors present a novel deep learning architecture that encodes OCO-2 spectral bands and estimates posteriors using Laplace approximations and normalizing flows, achieving five advantages over full-physics solvers: amortized fast inference, robustness to model errors via training on discrepant simulations, superior point estimate accuracy, better-calibrated uncertainties, and successful modeling of complex non-Gaussian posteriors.

What carries the argument

A multi-branch neural network that processes spectral bands separately, combined with either Laplace approximations or normalizing flows to estimate the posterior distribution over CO2 column values.

If this is right

  • Real-time processing of massive satellite data streams becomes feasible due to amortized inference.
  • Systematic errors from forward model discrepancies are accounted for during training.
  • Point estimates of XCO2 achieve higher accuracy than baseline methods.
  • Uncertainty estimates are better calibrated than those from operational solvers.
  • Complex asymmetric posterior distributions can be modeled when using normalizing flows.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar simulation-trained networks could extend to retrievals of other atmospheric gases or from different satellite instruments.
  • The framework might enable ensemble predictions for improved global carbon flux inversions.
  • Integration into operational pipelines could reduce computational costs for reprocessing historical OCO-2 data.
  • Testing on real OCO-2 observations against independent validation sources would further validate the approach.

Load-bearing premise

The high-fidelity simulation dataset accurately captures real OCO-2 observations and forward model errors.

What would settle it

If the deep learning posteriors fail to match the distribution of XCO2 values obtained from full-physics retrievals on a large set of independent simulated spectra that include the same model errors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.17413 by Alejandro Calle-Saldarriaga, Felix Jimenez, Jack Grosskreuz, Jiazheng Wang, Jonathan Hobbs, Matthias Katzfuss.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Locations of reference soundings for OCO-2 simulation experiments during February 2020. Colors [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Network architecture. Each of the three OCO-2 spectral bands is processed by its own 1D convolutional encoder. The auxiliary variables (solar zenith angle, footprint, and aerosol types) are embedded by a separate auxiliary encoder. The resulting four embeddings are fused through a Transformer-based attention block and passed to a task-specific MLP head for scalar or profile prediction. from the spectral sp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: PIT histograms for scalar XCO2 prediction across the three methods. A perfectly calibrated predictive distribution produces a uniform histogram (dashed line). The NASA retrieval (left) shows severe concentration of mass near 0 and 1, indicating that the true value frequently falls outside the predicted intervals. The Laplace approximation (center) shows a hump-shaped histogram peaking near 0.5 with reduced… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Empirical coverage curves for scalar XCO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Per-level performance for full 20-dimensional CO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Performance on the near-surface CO2 profile levels (levels 17–20). We compare dedicated 4-output probabilistic retrieval models with marginals extracted from models trained on the full 20-dimensional profile, along with the operational NASA retrieval. Note that the native 4D NF is uniformly better than the other compared models in RMSE and marginal likelihood. 4.5 Non-Gaussian posteriors Operational retrie… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Bivariate posterior slices for CO2 levels 17 and 20 for six test soundings. Blue points are samples from the normalizing-flow posterior pNF(x|y). Solid contours show the 68% and 95% 2D χ 2 probability re￾gions of the NASA retrieval Gaussian approximation obtained by projecting the operational mean/covariance onto (x17, x20). Additional Gaussian contours show the Laplace approximation of the neural retrieva… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Median test-time wall-clock cost per sounding for different models at batch size 256. Reported [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Space-based monitoring of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is essential for constraining the global carbon budget. NASA's Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 (OCO-2) estimates column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of CO2 (XCO2) using high-resolution spectra. However, current operational retrieval algorithms are computationally expensive and do not properly quantify uncertainties. We present a novel deep learning framework that addresses these challenges. Due to the difficulties of ground-truth data for real satellite observations, we develop and validate our approach using a high-fidelity simulation dataset. This dataset, created to support OCO-2 uncertainty quantification (UQ), incorporates realistic forward model errors. Our architecture encodes spectral bands using a multi-branch neural network and estimates posteriors of the full CO2 column or desired summaries thereof using two scalable UQ methods: Laplace approximations and normalizing flows. Our approach has five key advantages relative to operational "full-physics" solvers: (1) Amortization: Inference is orders of magnitude faster, enabling real-time processing of massive data streams; (2) Model error robustness: By training on simulations that explicitly include model discrepancies, our method accounts for systematic errors often neglected by standard inversions; (3) Point estimate accuracy: We achieve superior predictive accuracy compared to baseline methods; (4) Improved UQ: The probabilistic outputs yield better-calibrated uncertainty estimates; and (5) Non-Gaussian posteriors: When utilizing normalizing flows, our framework successfully models complex, asymmetric posterior distributions, overcoming the limitations of the Gaussian assumption. These results suggest that simulation-based deep learning is a viable path toward next-generation operational processing systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a deep learning framework for amortized probabilistic retrieval of column-averaged CO2 (XCO2) from OCO-2 spectra. A multi-branch neural network encodes the spectral bands, after which posteriors are estimated either via Laplace approximations or normalizing flows. All training and evaluation occur on a high-fidelity simulation dataset constructed to include realistic forward-model errors. The authors assert five advantages over operational full-physics solvers: orders-of-magnitude faster inference, explicit robustness to model discrepancies, superior point-estimate accuracy, better-calibrated uncertainties, and the ability to represent non-Gaussian posterior shapes.

Significance. Should the simulation-to-real transfer hold, the work would offer a practical route to real-time, probabilistically calibrated processing of the massive OCO-2 data stream and could extend to future missions. The explicit use of normalizing flows to capture asymmetric posteriors is a technically interesting contribution within the remote-sensing retrieval literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the five claimed advantages (especially model-error robustness, superior accuracy, and improved UQ) are asserted without any numerical metrics, confidence intervals, or ablation tables. All supporting evidence is confined to the simulated dataset whose fidelity to real OCO-2 instrument and forward-model errors is stated but not externally verified.
  2. [§4–§5] Validation strategy (throughout §4–§5): the central claim that training on simulations “explicitly include model discrepancies” yields robustness that transfers to real observations rests on an untested sim-to-real mapping. No real OCO-2 soundings paired with independent ground truth (TCCON, aircraft profiles, or other in-situ references) are used for either training or final evaluation, leaving the reported gains in accuracy and calibration vulnerable to unmodeled scene-dependent effects.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract lists five advantages but does not number them consistently with the later text; adding explicit numbering would improve readability.
  2. Notation for the Laplace and flow-based posterior approximations should be unified across equations and figures to avoid reader confusion between the two UQ branches.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below, acknowledging where revisions are warranted while clarifying the scope of the current work, which is explicitly simulation-based due to the challenges of real ground-truth data.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the five claimed advantages (especially model-error robustness, superior accuracy, and improved UQ) are asserted without any numerical metrics, confidence intervals, or ablation tables. All supporting evidence is confined to the simulated dataset whose fidelity to real OCO-2 instrument and forward-model errors is stated but not externally verified.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from representative quantitative results. In the revised version we will incorporate key metrics from the simulation experiments (e.g., RMSE for point estimates, expected calibration error for UQ, and wall-clock inference times) together with uncertainty ranges. The abstract will also more explicitly note that all reported gains are demonstrated on the high-fidelity simulated dataset that includes forward-model discrepancies. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4–§5] Validation strategy (throughout §4–§5): the central claim that training on simulations “explicitly include model discrepancies” yields robustness that transfers to real observations rests on an untested sim-to-real mapping. No real OCO-2 soundings paired with independent ground truth (TCCON, aircraft profiles, or other in-situ references) are used for either training or final evaluation, leaving the reported gains in accuracy and calibration vulnerable to unmodeled scene-dependent effects.

    Authors: We concur that the sim-to-real transfer remains untested and constitutes a genuine limitation. The manuscript already states that real satellite observations lack readily available ground truth at the required scale, which motivated the use of a simulation dataset constructed with realistic model errors. We will expand the discussion in §§4–5 and add an explicit limitations paragraph that (i) reiterates the simulation-only scope, (ii) quantifies the injected discrepancies, and (iii) outlines future validation routes using TCCON or aircraft profiles. The robustness and calibration claims are therefore confined to the controlled simulation environment. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Direct empirical validation on real OCO-2 soundings paired with independent in-situ references (TCCON, aircraft, etc.), which is outside the scope of the present simulation-focused study.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained on independent simulation data

full rationale

The paper trains and evaluates a multi-branch neural network with Laplace approximations or normalizing flows on a high-fidelity simulation dataset explicitly constructed to include realistic forward-model errors. No equations, predictions, or central claims reduce by construction to quantities fitted from the authors' own prior outputs; the five listed advantages are presented as empirical performance metrics on this external simulation benchmark. No self-citation load-bearing steps, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work appear in the abstract or described framework. The approach is therefore self-contained against the stated simulation benchmark, with any sim-to-real transfer concerns falling outside circularity analysis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the simulation dataset faithfully representing real observations and model errors; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The high-fidelity simulation dataset accurately represents real OCO-2 observations including forward model errors.
    Stated directly in the abstract as the basis for training and validation due to lack of real ground-truth data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5852 in / 1268 out tokens · 29917 ms · 2026-06-27T01:58:53.185753+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

298 extracted references · 156 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018-Conference Track Proceedings , volume=

    A scalable laplace approximation for neural networks , author=. 6th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2018-Conference Track Proceedings , volume=. 2018 , organization=

    2018

  2. [2]

    Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

    Laplace redux-effortless bayesian deep learning , author=. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume=

  3. [3]

    (No Title) , year=

    Calvin, Katherine and Dasgupta, Dipak and Krinner, Gerhard and Mukherji, Aditi and Thorne, Peter W and Trisos, Christopher and Romero, Jos. (No Title) , year=

  4. [4]

    Eldering, Annmarie and O'Dell, Chris W and Wennberg, Paul O and Crisp, David and Gunson, Michael R and Viatte, Camille and Avis, Charles and Braverman, Amy and Castano, Rebecca and Chang, Albert and others , journal=. The. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  5. [5]

    The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science , volume=

    On the influence of carbonic acid in the air upon the temperature of the ground , author=. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science , volume=. 1896 , publisher=

  6. [6]

    SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification , volume=

    Post hoc uncertainty quantification for remote sensing observing systems , author=. SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  7. [7]

    2019 , organization=

    Basilio, Ralph R and Bennett, Matthew W and Eldering, Annmarie and Lawson, Peter R and Rosenberg, Robert A , booktitle=. 2019 , organization=

    2019

  8. [8]

    SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification , volume=

    Objective Frequentist Uncertainty Quantification for Atmospheric Retrievals , author=. SIAM/ASA Journal on Uncertainty Quantification , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  9. [9]

    and O'Dell, C

    Crisp, D. and O'Dell, C. and Eldering, A. and Fisher, B. and Oyafuso, F. and Payne, V. and Drouin, B. and Toon, G. and Laughner, J. and Somkuti, P. and McGarragh, G. and Merrelli, A. and Nelson, R. and Gunson, M. and Frankenberg, C. and Osterman, G. and Boesch, H. and Brown, L. and Castano, R. and Christi, M. and Connor, B. and McDuffie, J. and Miller, C....

  10. [10]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , volume=

    David, Leslie and Br. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  11. [11]

    On the potential of a neural-network-based approach for estimating

    Br. On the potential of a neural-network-based approach for estimating. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , volume=. 2022 , publisher=

    2022

  12. [12]

    A nonlinear data-driven approach to bias correction of

    Keely, William R and Mauceri, Steffen and Crowell, Sean and O'Dell, Christopher W , journal=. A nonlinear data-driven approach to bias correction of. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  13. [13]

    Conditional Diffusion-Based Retrieval of Atmospheric

    Keely, William R and Lamminp. Conditional Diffusion-Based Retrieval of Atmospheric. arXiv preprint arXiv:2504.17074 , year=

    arXiv

  14. [14]

    Uncertainty-aware machine learning bias correction and filtering for

    Mauceri, Steffen and Keely, William and Laughner, Josh and O’Dell, Christopher W and Massie, Steven and Nelson, Robert and Baker, David and Kiel, Matth. Uncertainty-aware machine learning bias correction and filtering for. Earth and Space Science , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  15. [15]

    Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning Bias Correction and Filtering for

    Keely, William and Mauceri, Steffen and Nelson, Robert and Laughner, Josh and O’Dell, Christopher W and Massie, Steven and Baker, David and Kiel, Matth. Uncertainty-Aware Machine Learning Bias Correction and Filtering for. Earth and Space Science , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  16. [16]

    Journal of Remote Sensing , volume=

    From Deterministic to Probabilistic: A Lightweight Framework for Probabilistic Machine Learning in Trace Gas Remote Sensing , author=. Journal of Remote Sensing , volume=. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  17. [17]

    Transformer-Based Fast Mole Fraction of

    Chen, Wei and Ren, Tao and Zhao, Changying and Wen, Yuan and Gu, Yilei and Zhou, Minqiang and Wang, Pucai , journal=. Transformer-Based Fast Mole Fraction of. 2025 , publisher=

    2025

  18. [18]

    O'Dell, C. W. and Connor, B. and B\"osch, H. and O'Brien, D. and Frankenberg, C. and Castano, R. and Christi, M. and Eldering, D. and Fisher, B. and Gunson, M. and McDuffie, J. and Miller, C. E. and Natraj, V. and Oyafuso, F. and Polonsky, I. and Smyth, M. and Taylor, T. and Toon, G. C. and Wennberg, P. O. and Wunch, D. , TITLE =. Atmospheric Measurement ...

    2012

  19. [19]

    and Fisher, B

    Crisp, D. and Fisher, B. M. and O'Dell, C. and Frankenberg, C. and Basilio, R. and B\"osch, H. and Brown, L. R. and Castano, R. and Connor, B. and Deutscher, N. M. and Eldering, A. and Griffith, D. and Gunson, M. and Kuze, A. and Mandrake, L. and McDuffie, J. and Messerschmidt, J. and Miller, C. E. and Morino, I. and Natraj, V. and Notholt, J. and O'Brien...

    2012

  20. [20]

    and B\"osch, H

    Connor, B. and B\"osch, H. and McDuffie, J. and Taylor, T. and Fu, D. and Frankenberg, C. and O'Dell, C. and Payne, V. H. and Gunson, M. and Pollock, R. and Hobbs, J. and Oyafuso, F. and Jiang, Y. , TITLE =. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , VOLUME =. 2016 , NUMBER =

    2016

  21. [21]

    Kulawik, S. S. and O'Dell, C. and Nelson, R. R. and Taylor, T. E. , TITLE =. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques , VOLUME =. 2019 , NUMBER =

    2019

  22. [22]

    Simulation-based uncertainty quantification for estimating atmospheric

    Hobbs, Jonathan and Braverman, Amy and Cressie, Noel and Granat, Robert and Gunson, Michael , journal=. Simulation-based uncertainty quantification for estimating atmospheric. 2017 , publisher=

    2017

  23. [23]

    and Drouin, Brian J and Oyafuso, Fabiano and Payne, Vivienne H and Gunson, Michael R and McDuffie, James and Mlawer, Eli J , journal=

    Hobbs, J. and Drouin, Brian J and Oyafuso, Fabiano and Payne, Vivienne H and Gunson, Michael R and McDuffie, James and Mlawer, Eli J , journal=. Spectroscopic uncertainty impacts on. 2020 , publisher=

    2020

  24. [24]

    Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions , volume=

    Evaluating the consistency between OCO-2 and OCO-3 XCO 2 estimates derived from the NASA ACOS version 10 retrieval algorithm , author=. Atmospheric Measurement Techniques Discussions , volume=. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  25. [25]

    2000 , publisher=

    Inverse methods for atmospheric sounding: theory and practice , author=. 2000 , publisher=

    2000

  26. [26]

    Laplace Redux--Effortless

    Erik Daxberger and Agustinus Kristiadi and Alexander Immer and Runa Eschenhagen and Matthias Bauer and Philipp Hennig , booktitle=. Laplace Redux--Effortless

  27. [27]

    Journal of machine learning research , volume=

    Covariances, robustness, and variational Bayes , author=. Journal of machine learning research , volume=

  28. [28]

    O'Dell, C. W. and Eldering, A. and Wennberg, P. O. and Crisp, D. and Gunson, M. R. and Fisher, B. and Frankenberg, C. and Kiel, M. and Lindqvist, H. and Mandrake, L. and Merrelli, A. and Natraj, V. and Nelson, R. R. and Osterman, G. B. and Payne, V. H. and Taylor, T. E. and Wunch, D. and Drouin, B. J. and Oyafuso, F. and Chang, A. and McDuffie, J. and Smy...

    2018

  29. [29]

    Optimal Estimation Versus

    Brynjarsdottir, Jenny and Hobbs, Jonathan and Braverman, Amy and Mandrake, Lukas , journal=. Optimal Estimation Versus. 2018 , publisher=

    2018

  30. [30]

    Accelerated

    Lamminp. Accelerated. Remote Sensing , volume=. 2019 , publisher=

    2019

  31. [31]

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.4296287 , url =

    Conor Durkan and Artur Bekasov and Iain Murray and George Papamakarios , title =. doi:10.5281/zenodo.4296287 , url =

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.4296287

  32. [32]

    What uncertainties do we need in

    Kendall, Alex and Gal, Yarin , journal=. What uncertainties do we need in

  33. [33]

    Machine learning , volume=

    Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: An introduction to concepts and methods , author=. Machine learning , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  34. [34]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 , year=

    Decoupled weight decay regularization , author=. arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101 , year=

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Akiba, Takuya and Sano, Shotaro and Yanase, Toshihiko and Ohta, Takeru and Koyama, Masanori , booktitle=

  36. [36]

    Assessing the feasibility of using a neural network to filter

    Mendonca, Joseph and Nassar, Ray and O'Dell, Christopher W and Kivi, Rigel and Morino, Isamu and Notholt, Justus and Petri, Christof and Strong, Kimberly and Wunch, Debra , journal=. Assessing the feasibility of using a neural network to filter. 2021 , publisher=

    2021

  37. [37]

    The Influence of Validation Colocation on

    Li, Ruoxi and Zhou, Xiang and Cheng, Tianhai and Tao, Zui and Gu, Xingfa and Wang, Ning and Zhang, Hongming and Lv, Tingting , journal=. The Influence of Validation Colocation on. 2023 , publisher=

    2023

  38. [38]

    Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =

    Precision requirements for space-based XCO _2 data , volume =. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1029/2006JD007659 , number =

    work page doi:10.1029/2006jd007659 2007

  39. [39]

    Sensitivity of Optimal Estimation Satellite Retrievals to Misspecification of the Prior Mean and Covariance, with Application to

    Nguyen, Hai and Cressie, Noel and Hobbs, Jonathan , journal=. Sensitivity of Optimal Estimation Satellite Retrievals to Misspecification of the Prior Mean and Covariance, with Application to. 2019 , doi =

    2019

  40. [40]

    2023 , institution =

    Climate. 2023 , institution =. doi:10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 , url =

    work page doi:10.59327/ipcc/ar6-9789291691647 2023

  41. [41]

    and O'Dell, C

    Osterman, G. and O'Dell, C. and Eldering, A. and Fisher, B. and Crisp, D. and Cheng, C. and Frankenberg, C. and Lambert, A. and Gunson, M. and Mandrake, L. and Wunch, D. , year=

  42. [42]

    Earth System Science Data , volume=

    The total carbon column observing network's GGG2020 data version , author=. Earth System Science Data , volume=. 2024 , publisher=

    2024

  43. [43]

    An Error Model for Evaluating the Accuracy of Satellite-Based

    Yadav, Vineet and Hobbs, Jonathan and Nguyen, Hai M and Kulawik, Susan S and Liu, Junjie and Baker, David F and Morino, Isamu and Ohyama, Hirofumi and Velazco, Voltaire A and Vrekoussis, Mihalis and others , journal=. An Error Model for Evaluating the Accuracy of Satellite-Based

  44. [44]

    , number =

    Stein, Michael L. , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1214/11-AOS909 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1214/11-aos909 2011

  45. [45]

    and Schmidt, H

    Elbern, H. and Schmidt, H. and Talagrand, Olivier and Ebel, A. , number =. 2000 , journal =. doi:10.1016/S1364-8152(00)00049-9 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/s1364-8152(00)00049-9 2000

  46. [46]

    and Katzfuss, Matthias and Wikle, Christopher K

    Stroud, Jonathan R. and Katzfuss, Matthias and Wikle, Christopher K. , number =. 2018 , journal =. doi:10.1175/MWR-D-16-0427.1 , arxivId =

    work page doi:10.1175/mwr-d-16-0427.1 2018

  47. [47]

    and Tawn, Jonathan A , number =

    Coles, S.G. and Tawn, Jonathan A , number =. 1996 , journal =

    1996

  48. [48]

    , number =

    Handcock, Mark S and Stein, Michael L. , number =. 1993 , journal =

    1993

  49. [49]

    1999 , booktitle =

    Knuth, Kevin H , pages =. 1999 , booktitle =

    1999

  50. [50]

    2010 , journal =

    Stegle, Oliver and Parts, Leopold and Durbin, Richard and Winn, John , number =. 2010 , journal =. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000770 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000770 2010

  51. [51]

    Di Narzo, A. F. and Cocchi, D. , number =. 2010 , journal =. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00700.x , issn =

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1467-9876.2009.00700.x 2010

  52. [52]

    and Smith, Richard L

    Katzfuss, Matthias and Hammerling, Dorit M. and Smith, Richard L. , number =. 2017 , journal =. doi:10.1002/2017GL073688 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1002/2017gl073688 2017

  53. [53]

    and Buxton, Bruce E and Craigmile, Peter F

    Paul, Rajib and Cressie, Noel and Calder, Catherine A. and Buxton, Bruce E and Craigmile, Peter F. and Li, Hongfei and Mcmillan, Nancy J and Morara, Michele and Sanford, Jessica and Santner, Thomas J and Zhang, Jian , number =. 2007 , booktitle =

    2007

  54. [54]

    IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop , author =

    Proc. IEEE Sensor Array and Multichannel Signal Processing Workshop , author =

  55. [55]

    , pages =

    Xu, Ganggang and Liang, Faming and Genton, Marc G. , pages =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.5705/ss.2013.085w , issn =

    work page doi:10.5705/ss.2013.085w 2015

  56. [56]

    and Berliner, L

    Wikle, Christopher K. and Berliner, L. Mark , number =. 2007 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.09.017 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physd.2006.09.017 2007

  57. [57]

    and Fricker, T.E

    Ferro, C.A.T. and Fricker, T.E. , month =. 2012 , journal =. doi:10.1002/qj.1924 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1002/qj.1924 2012

  58. [58]

    and Gelfand, Alan E

    Berrocal, Veronica J. and Gelfand, Alan E. and Holland, David M. , url =. 2011 , journal =

    2011

  59. [59]

    and Jones, Andrew S

    Kidder, Stanley Q. and Jones, Andrew S. , number =. 2007 , journal =

    2007

  60. [60]

    2008 , journal =

    Manzan, S and Zerom, D , number =. 2008 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.12.004 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.12.004 2008

  61. [61]

    and Datta, Abhirup and Finley, Andrew O

    Heaton, Matthew J. and Datta, Abhirup and Finley, Andrew O. and Furrer, Reinhard and Guinness, Joseph and Guhaniyogi, Rajarshi and Gerber, Florian and Gramacy, Robert B. and Hammerling, Dorit M. and Katzfuss, Matthias and Lindgren, Finn and Nychka, Douglas W. and Sun, Furong and Zammit-Mangion, Andrew , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.1007/s13253-018-0...

    work page doi:10.1007/s13253-018-00348-w 2019

  62. [62]

    and Eidsvik, Jo and Guindani, Michele and Nail, Amy J

    Reich, Brian J. and Eidsvik, Jo and Guindani, Michele and Nail, Amy J. and Schmidt, Alexandra M. , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1214/11-AOAS482 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1214/11-aoas482 2011

  63. [63]

    2020 , journal =

    Katzfuss, Matthias and Gong, Wenlong , number =. 2020 , journal =

    2020

  64. [64]

    2015 , journal =

    Liang, Min and Marcotte, Denis , publisher =. 2015 , journal =. doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1100-y , issn =

    work page doi:10.1007/s00477-015-1100-y 2015

  65. [65]

    2004 , journal =

    Wall, Melanie M , url =. 2004 , journal =

    2004

  66. [66]

    2013 , journal =

    Bolin, David and Lindgren, Finn , month =. 2013 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.11.011 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.csda.2012.11.011 2013

  67. [67]

    , number =

    Fasiolo, Matteo and Pya, Natalya and Wood, Simon N. , number =. 2016 , journal =. doi:10.1214/15-STS534 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1214/15-sts534 2016

  68. [68]

    2014 , journal =

    Bradley, Jonathan R and Cressie, Noel and Shi, Tao , arxivId =. 2014 , journal =

    2014

  69. [69]

    and Zimmerman, M.B

    Zimmerman, D.L. and Zimmerman, M.B. , number =. 1991 , journal =

    1991

  70. [70]

    1999 , journal =

    Curriero, FC and Lele, Subhash , number =. 1999 , journal =

    1999

  71. [71]

    2011 , journal =

    Kyung, Minjung , number =. 2011 , journal =. doi:10.1214/11-BA629 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1214/11-ba629 2011

  72. [72]

    and Dubovik, Oleg and Schechner, Yoav , number =

    Xu, Feng and Diner, David J. and Dubovik, Oleg and Schechner, Yoav , number =. 2019 , journal =. doi:10.3390/rs11070746 , issn =

    work page doi:10.3390/rs11070746 2019

  73. [73]

    , pages =

    Horrell, Michael T and Stein, Michael L. , pages =. 2015 , journal =

    2015

  74. [74]

    Journal of the American Statistical Association , volume =

    Zhou, Xingyu and Jiao, Yuling and Liu, Jin and Huang, Jian , volume =. 2022 , journal =. doi:10.1080/01621459.2021.2016424 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1080/01621459.2021.2016424 2022

  75. [75]

    and Cressie, Noel , number =

    Wikle, Christopher K. and Cressie, Noel , number =. 1999 , journal =

    1999

  76. [76]

    , number =

    Storey, John D. , number =. 2002 , journal =. doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1111/1467-9868.00346 2002

  77. [77]

    2012 , journal =

    Sigrist, Fabio and K. 2012 , journal =

    2012

  78. [78]

    2005 , journal =

    Tzeng, ShengLi and Huang, Hsin-Cheng and Cressie, Noel , number =. 2005 , journal =. doi:10.1198/016214505000000420 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1198/016214505000000420 2005

  79. [79]

    Voutilainen, A. and Pyh. 2007 , journal =

    2007

  80. [80]

    2005 , journal =

    Fuentes, Montserrat , number =. 2005 , journal =. doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.09.003 , issn =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmva.2004.09.003 2005

Showing first 80 references.