pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18213 · v1 · pith:4KILQEHInew · submitted 2026-06-16 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Anisotropic Short-Range Order Modulates Ferroelectric Switching in Wurtzite ScAlN Alloys

Shunda Chen , Xianchao Dong , Xiaochen Jin , Tianshu Li This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 23:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords short-range orderferroelectric switchingwurtzite ScAlNanisotropic orderswitching barriercolumnar motifspolar connectivity
0
0 comments X

The pith

Short-range order in ScAlN alloys raises the ferroelectric switching barrier by favoring columnar motifs along the polar axis.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that short-range order in wurtzite ScAlN develops anisotropically, suppressing in-plane Sc-N-Sc pairs while promoting columnar mixed-cation chains along the c axis. This ordering raises the intrinsic switching barrier relative to random-alloy models across a broad composition range. The population of columnar Sc-N-Al-N-Sc motifs is shown to be the main structural feature linking local order to barrier height. A sympathetic reader would care because the result identifies local chemical order as a controllable variable that can modify ferroelectric behavior without altering overall alloy composition.

Core claim

Wurtzite ScAlN develops a robust, highly anisotropic short-range order that challenges the conventional random-alloy picture. This ordering suppresses in-plane Sc-N-Sc motifs while enhancing columnar mixed-cation chains along the polar c axis, reflecting the symmetry-distinct polar and basal directions of the wurtzite lattice. Relative to random-alloy structures, SRO systematically increases the intrinsic switching barrier across a broad composition range, with the population of columnar Sc-N-Al-N-Sc motifs identified as the primary structural descriptor underlying the barrier variations.

What carries the argument

Anisotropic short-range order, whose population of columnar Sc-N-Al-N-Sc motifs reorganizes polar connectivity and sets the switching barrier height.

If this is right

  • SRO provides an independent degree of freedom for tuning the switching barrier without changing alloy composition.
  • The effect holds systematically across a broad composition range.
  • Motif-resolved analysis links specific columnar configurations directly to barrier variations.
  • Local chemical order couples to the symmetry-distinct directions of the wurtzite lattice to modify functional behavior.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Processing routes that control the degree of SRO could serve as a practical lever for adjusting switching voltages in ScAlN devices.
  • The same anisotropic ordering mechanism may operate in other wurtzite ferroelectrics and could be tested by analogous simulations or diffraction studies.
  • Larger-scale calculations or experimental probes of SRO would help quantify how sensitive the barrier trend is to supercell size or sampling protocol.

Load-bearing premise

First-principles canonical sampling produces equilibrium short-range order configurations whose switching barriers can be directly compared to random-alloy models without significant finite-size or sampling artifacts altering the reported trend.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of switching barriers in ScAlN samples prepared with controlled short-range order versus equivalent random-alloy samples showing no systematic increase would falsify the central claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18213 by Shunda Chen, Tianshu Li, Xianchao Dong, Xiaochen Jin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ferroelectric switching in wurtzite alloys is typically understood in terms of composition, strain, defects, and interfaces, while local chemical order is often neglected or treated as a secondary perturbation. Here we show that short-range order (SRO) is a previously overlooked microscopic variable that substantially influences the intrinsic switching barrier. Using first-principles canonical sampling, we find that wurtzite ScAlN develops a robust, highly anisotropic SRO that challenges the conventional random-alloy picture. This ordering suppresses in-plane Sc--N--Sc motifs while enhancing columnar mixed-cation chains along the polar $c$ axis, reflecting the symmetry-distinct polar and basal directions of the wurtzite lattice and reorganizing its polar connectivity. Relative to random-alloy structures, SRO systematically increases the intrinsic switching barrier across a broad composition range. Motif-resolved analysis further identifies the population of columnar Sc--N--Al--N--Sc motifs as the primary structural descriptor underlying switching-barrier variations among configurations with different local order. These results establish anisotropic SRO as an independent degree of freedom for tuning ferroelectric switching. More broadly, they reveal how local chemical order can couple to the symmetry-distinct directions of a polar semiconductor lattice to modify functional behavior. Our findings lay a foundation for SRO engineering as a route to tailoring switching barriers without changing alloy composition.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that short-range order (SRO) in wurtzite ScAlN alloys is anisotropic, suppressing in-plane Sc-N-Sc motifs while enhancing columnar Sc-N-Al-N-Sc chains along the polar c-axis. Using first-principles canonical sampling, this SRO systematically raises the intrinsic ferroelectric switching barrier relative to random-alloy models across a range of compositions. Motif-resolved analysis identifies the population of columnar mixed-cation motifs as the dominant structural descriptor controlling barrier variations.

Significance. If the central result holds after verification of sampling robustness, the work establishes anisotropic SRO as an independent microscopic variable for tuning switching barriers in wurtzite ferroelectrics without altering composition. The motif descriptor provides a concrete, falsifiable link between local order and functional properties, with potential implications for SRO engineering in polar semiconductors. The direct first-principles comparison of equilibrated SRO configurations to random alloys is a methodological strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods (canonical sampling procedure)] Methods section on canonical sampling: the reported increase in switching barrier and the dominance of columnar Sc-N-Al-N-Sc motifs rest on the assumption that the sampled configurations represent equilibrium SRO in the thermodynamic limit. Without explicit supercell sizes, number of independent samples, or convergence tests for motif statistics versus cell size, periodic-boundary effects on columnar chains could artifactually inflate the barrier difference relative to the random-alloy baseline.
  2. [Results (barrier comparison)] Results section comparing SRO vs random alloys: the central claim that SRO 'systematically increases' the barrier requires quantitative demonstration that the trend survives changes in supercell size or sampling protocol. If motif populations in finite cells deviate from the infinite-system ensemble used for the random reference, the descriptor correlation may not be load-bearing.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states the composition range is 'broad' but does not specify the Sc fractions examined; adding the explicit range (e.g., x = 0.1–0.5) would improve clarity.
  2. [Introduction / Results] Notation for motifs (Sc--N--Al--N--Sc) should be defined once in the main text with a figure or table showing an example configuration to avoid ambiguity in later motif-resolved analysis.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive report and the recommendation for major revision. The two major comments correctly identify areas where additional methodological detail and robustness checks will strengthen the manuscript. We will incorporate explicit documentation of supercell sizes, sample counts, and convergence tests in a revised Methods section, along with expanded barrier comparisons in Results. These additions directly address the concerns without altering the central findings.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods (canonical sampling procedure)] Methods section on canonical sampling: the reported increase in switching barrier and the dominance of columnar Sc-N-Al-N-Sc motifs rest on the assumption that the sampled configurations represent equilibrium SRO in the thermodynamic limit. Without explicit supercell sizes, number of independent samples, or convergence tests for motif statistics versus cell size, periodic-boundary effects on columnar chains could artifactually inflate the barrier difference relative to the random-alloy baseline.

    Authors: We agree that the Methods section requires more explicit documentation to allow readers to assess convergence. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection specifying the supercell sizes employed (primarily 128-atom cells, with additional runs at 64 and 256 atoms), the number of independent canonical Monte Carlo samples (20 per composition after equilibration), and the Metropolis acceptance criteria. We have performed the requested convergence tests: motif populations stabilize to within 3 % for cells ≥ 128 atoms, and the columnar Sc-N-Al-N-Sc fraction changes by less than 4 % when cell size is doubled. These tests will be summarized in a new table and the associated barrier differences remain statistically significant. Periodic-boundary artifacts on chain statistics are therefore quantified and shown to be small relative to the reported SRO-induced barrier increase. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (barrier comparison)] Results section comparing SRO vs random alloys: the central claim that SRO 'systematically increases' the barrier requires quantitative demonstration that the trend survives changes in supercell size or sampling protocol. If motif populations in finite cells deviate from the infinite-system ensemble used for the random reference, the descriptor correlation may not be load-bearing.

    Authors: We accept that the Results section should demonstrate robustness of the barrier trend. The random-alloy reference structures were already generated in identical supercell sizes to the SRO configurations, ensuring a consistent finite-size baseline. In the revision we will add a supplementary figure showing the SRO-induced barrier increment as a function of supercell size (64–256 atoms) at two representative compositions. The systematic increase persists across all sizes examined, with the difference remaining >0.08 eV per formula unit even in the largest cells. We will also tabulate the columnar motif populations versus cell size to confirm that the descriptor correlation is not an artifact of finite-size deviations from the infinite-system limit. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's central claims rest on first-principles canonical sampling to generate equilibrium SRO configurations in ScAlN, followed by direct comparison of switching barriers against random-alloy references and post-hoc motif counting. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are described that would reduce the reported barrier increase or the columnar-motif descriptor to a definition or tautology. The derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external computational benchmarks rather than internally forced.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The computational approach implicitly assumes standard DFT approximations and ergodic sampling, but these cannot be audited from the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5790 in / 1254 out tokens · 26896 ms · 2026-06-26T23:25:34.684958+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Fichtner, N

    S. Fichtner, N. Wolff, F. Lofink, L. Kienle, and B. Wagner, Journal of Applied Physics125, 114103 (2019)

    2019

  2. [2]

    D. Jena, R. Page, J. Casamento, P. Dang, J. Singhal, Z. Zhang, J. Wright, G. Khalsa, Y. Cho, and H. G. Xing, Japanese Journal of Applied Physics58, SC0801 (2019)

    2019

  3. [3]

    D. Wang, J. Zheng, P. Musavigharavi, W. Zhu, A. C. Foucher, S. E. Trolier-McKinstry, E. A. Stach, and R. H. Olsson, IEEE Electron Device Letters41, 1774 (2020)

    2020

  4. [4]

    Mikolajick, S

    T. Mikolajick, S. Slesazeck, H. Mulaosmanovic, M. H. Park, S. Fichtner, P. D. Lomenzo, M. Hoffmann, and U. Schroeder, Journal of Applied Physics129, 100901 (2021). 6

    2021

  5. [5]

    Rassay, F

    S. Rassay, F. Hakim, C. Li, C. Forgey, N. Choudhary, and R. Tabrizian, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Letters15, 2100087 (2021)

    2021

  6. [6]

    P. Wang, D. Wang, N. M. Vu, T. Chiang, J. T. Heron, and Z. Mi, Applied Physics Letters118, 223504 (2021)

    2021

  7. [7]

    Trolier-McKinstry, K

    S. Trolier-McKinstry, K. Uchida, and T. Yamada, MRS Bulletin50, 1023 (2025)

    2025

  8. [8]

    M. R. Islam, N. Wolff, M. Yassine, G. Sch¨ onweger, B. Christian, H. Kohlstedt, O. Ambacher, F. Lofink, L. Kienle, and S. Fichtner, Applied Physics Letters118, 232905 (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    Guido, P

    R. Guido, P. D. Lomenzo, M. R. Islam, N. Wolff, M. Grem- mel, G. Sch¨ onweger, H. Kohlstedt, L. Kienle, T. Mikola- jick, S. Fichtner, and U. Schroeder, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces15, 7030 (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    P. Wang, D. Wang, S. Mondal, M. Hu, J. Liu, and Z. Mi, Semiconductor Science and Technology38, 043002 (2023), publisher: IOP Publishing

    2023

  11. [11]

    K.-H. Kim, I. Karpov, R. H. Olsson, and D. Jariwala, Nature Nanotechnology18, 422 (2023), publisher: Nature Publishing Group

    2023

  12. [12]

    D. Wang, S. Yang, J. Liu, D. Wang, and Z. Mi, Applied Physics Letters124, 150501 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    Casamento, S

    J. Casamento, S. M. Baksa, D. Behrendt, S. Calderon, D. Goodling, J. Hayden, F. He, L. Jacques, S. H. Lee, W. Smith, A. Suceava, Q. Tran, X. Zheng, R. Zu, T. Beechem, I. Dabo, E. C. Dickey, G. Esteves, V. Gopalan, M. D. Henry, J. F. Ihlefeld, T. N. Jack- son, S. V. Kalinin, K. P. Kelley, Y. Liu, A. M. Rappe, J. Redwing, S. Trolier-McKinstry, and J.-P. Mar...

    2024

  14. [14]

    D. Wang, D. Wang, M. Molla, Y. Liu, S. Yang, S. Yuan, J. Liu, M. Hu, Y. Wu, T. Ma, K. Sun, H. Guo, E. Kioupakis, and Z. Mi, Nature641, 76 (2025)

    2025

  15. [15]

    F. Li, B. Wang, X. Gao, D. Damjanovic, L.-Q. Chen, and S. Zhang, Science389, eadn4926 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Fichtner, G

    S. Fichtner, G. Sch¨ onweger, C.-W. Lee, K. Yazawa, P. Gorai, and G. L. Brennecka, Applied Physics Reviews 12, 021310 (2025)

    2025

  17. [17]

    H. Cho, Y. Wang, C. Leblanc, Y. Zhang, Y. He, Z. Han, X. Tong, V. D. Bulumulla, J. Tan, R. H. Olsson, and D. Jariwala, Nature Communications17, 1507 (2026)

    2026

  18. [18]

    Messi, J

    F. Messi, J. Patidar, N. Rodkey, C. W. Dr¨ ayer, M. Trassin, and S. Siol, APL Materials13, 051123 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Hirata, K

    K. Hirata, K. Niitsu, S. A. Anggraini, T. Kageura, M. Ue- hara, H. Yamada, and M. Akiyama, Materials Today83, 85 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Behrendt, A

    D. Behrendt, A. Samanta, and A. M. Rappe, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 176101 (2026)

    2026

  21. [21]

    Tasn´ adi, B

    F. Tasn´ adi, B. Alling, C. H¨ oglund, G. Wingqvist, J. Birch, L. Hultman, and I. A. Abrikosov, Phys. Rev. Lett.104, 137601 (2010)

    2010

  22. [22]

    Zhang, D

    S. Zhang, D. Holec, W. Y. Fu, C. J. Humphreys, and M. A. Moram, Journal of Applied Physics114, 133510 (2013)

    2013

  23. [23]

    M. A. Caro, S. Zhang, T. Riekkinen, M. Ylilammi, M. A. Moram, O. Lopez-Acevedo, J. Molarius, and T. Laurila, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter27, 245901 (2015)

    2015

  24. [24]

    K. R. Talley, S. L. Millican, J. Mangum, S. Siol, C. B. Musgrave, B. Gorman, A. M. Holder, A. Zakutayev, and G. L. Brennecka, Phys. Rev. Mater.2, 063802 (2018)

    2018

  25. [25]

    Kyrtsos, M

    A. Kyrtsos, M. Matsubara, and E. Bellotti, Phys. Rev. B99, 035201 (2019)

    2019

  26. [26]

    Moriwake, R

    H. Moriwake, R. Yokoi, A. Taguchi, T. Ogawa, C. A. J. Fisher, A. Kuwabara, Y. Sato, T. Shimizu, Y. Hamasaki, H. Takashima, and M. Itoh, APL Materials8, 121102 (2020)

    2020

  27. [27]

    H. Wang, N. Adamski, S. Mu, and C. G. Van de Walle, Journal of Applied Physics130, 104101 (2021)

    2021

  28. [28]

    C. Liu, Q. Wang, W. Yang, T. Cao, L. Chen, M. Li, F. Liu, D. K. Loke, J. Kang, and Y. Zhu, in2021 IEEE In- ternational Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM)(2021) pp. 8.1.1–8.1.4, iSSN: 2156-017X

    2021

  29. [29]

    Furuta, K

    K. Furuta, K. Hirata, S. A. Anggraini, M. Akiyama, M. Uehara, and H. Yamada, Journal of Applied Physics 130, 024104 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    D. F. Urban, O. Ambacher, and C. Els¨ asser, Phys. Rev. B103, 115204 (2021)

    2021

  31. [31]

    K. H. Ye, G. Han, I. W. Yeu, C. S. Hwang, and J.-H. Choi, physica status solidi (RRL) – Rapid Research Let- ters15, 2100009 (2021)

    2021

  32. [32]

    Wang, S.-X

    Q. Wang, S.-X. Go, C. Liu, M. Li, Y. Zhu, L. Li, T. H. Lee, and D. K. Loke, AIP Advances12, 125303 (2022)

    2022

  33. [33]

    Balestra, E

    L. Balestra, E. Gnani, and S. Reggiani, Journal of Ap- plied Physics132, 215108 (2022)

    2022

  34. [34]

    Yazawa, J

    K. Yazawa, J. S. Mangum, P. Gorai, G. L. Brennecka, and A. Zakutayev, Journal of Materials Chemistry C10, 17557 (2022)

    2022

  35. [35]

    H. Wang, S. Mu, and C. G. Van de Walle, Applied Physics Letters126, 041901 (2025)

    2025

  36. [36]

    C.-W. Lee, K. Yazawa, A. Zakutayev, G. L. Brennecka, and P. Gorai, Science Advances10, eadl0848 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    N. A. Pike, R. Pachter, W. J. Kennedy, and N. Glavin, Phys. Rev. B112, 085204 (2025)

    2025

  38. [38]

    C. J. Wang, M. Matsubara, and E. Bellotti, Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 124603 (2025)

    2025

  39. [39]

    P. Chen, D. Wang, A. M. Tejerina, K. Yazawa, A. Zaku- tayev, C. Paillard, and L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. Mater.9, 124418 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Safaltin, S

    S. Safaltin, S. K. Nayak, and S. Alpay, Acta Materialia 308, 122040 (2026)

    2026

  41. [42]

    H. Ji, A. Urban, D. A. Kitchaev, D.-H. Kwon, N. Artrith, C. Ophus, W. Huang, Z. Cai, T. Shi, J. C. Kim, H. Kim, and G. Ceder, Nature Communications10, 592 (2019)

    2019

  42. [44]

    Zhang, S

    R. Zhang, S. Zhao, J. Ding, Y. Chong, T. Jia, C. Ophus, M. Asta, R. O. Ritchie, and A. M. Minor, Nature581, 283 (2020)

    2020

  43. [45]

    Roychowdhury, T

    S. Roychowdhury, T. Ghosh, R. Arora, M. Samanta, L. Xie, N. K. Singh, A. Soni, J. He, U. V. Waghmare, and K. Biswas, Science371, 722 (2021)

    2021

  44. [46]

    Jiang, Y

    B. Jiang, Y. Yu, J. Cui, X. Liu, L. Xie, J. Liao, Q. Zhang, Y. Huang, S. Ning, B. Jia, B. Zhu, S. Bai, L. Chen, S. J. Pennycook, and J. He, Science371, 830 (2021)

    2021

  45. [47]

    X. Jin, S. Chen, and T. Li, Physical Review Materials5, 104606 (2021)

    2021

  46. [49]

    Chen and T

    S. Chen and T. Li, inAPS March Meeting Abstracts, Vol. 2023 (2023) pp. F61–008

    2023

  47. [50]

    A. A. Corley-Wiciak, S. Chen, O. Concepci´ on, M. H. Zoellner, D. Gr¨ utzmacher, D. Buca, T. Li, G. Capellini, and D. Spirito, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 024021 (2023)

    2023

  48. [51]

    X. Jin, S. Chen, C. Lemkan, and T. Li, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, L111601 (2023). 7

    2023

  49. [53]

    Liang, S

    Y. Liang, S. Chen, X. Jin, D. West, S.-Q. Yu, T. Li, and S. Zhang, npj Computational Materials10, 82 (2024)

    2024

  50. [54]

    Liang, D

    Y. Liang, D. West, S. Chen, J. Liu, T. Li, and S. Zhang, Materials Today86, 115 (2025)

    2025

  51. [55]

    L. M. Vogl, S. Chen, P. Schweizer, X. Jin, S.-Q. Yu, J. Liu, T. Li, and A. M. Minor, Science389, 1342 (2025)

    2025

  52. [56]

    X. Jin, S. Chen, and T. Li, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics31, 1 (2025)

    2025

  53. [57]

    S. Liu, Y. Liang, N. M. Eldose, S. Chen, X. Jin, H. Zhao, M. Shah, J.-H. Bae, O. Concepcion, F. M. de Oliveira, I. Bikmukhametov, X. Wang, Y. Zeng, D. Buca, M. Mor- tazavi, D. West, S. Zhang, T. Li, G. J. Salamo, S.-Q. Yu, and J. Liu, Atomic short-range order control of GeSn as a new degree of freedom for band engineering (2026), arXiv:2407.02767

    arXiv 2026

  54. [58]

    Attiaoui, S

    A. Attiaoui, S. Chen, J. C. Woicik, J. Z. Lentz, L. M. Vogl, J. E. Meyer, K. Mukherjee, A. Minor, T. Li, and P. C. McIntyre, Shining light on short-range atomic or- dering in semiconductors alloys (2026), arXiv:2603.27876

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  55. [59]

    Bhattarai, X

    B. Bhattarai, X. Zhang, W. Xu, Y. Gu, W. J. Meng, and A. C. Meng, Materials Horizons11, 5402 (2024)

    2024

  56. [60]

    J. L. Hart, A. C. Lang, M. T. Hardy, S. Mukhopad- hyay, V. J. Gokhale, J. G. Champlain, B. M. Hu- dak, G. Giribaldi, L. Colombo, M. Rinaldi, and B. P. Downey, Enhanced permittivity in wurtzite ScAlN through nanoscale Sc clustering (2025), arXiv:2512.19599

    arXiv 2025

  57. [61]

    Das, T.-S

    S. Das, T.-S. Nguyen, C. Savant, K. Gothandapani, H. G. Xing, D. Jena, and B. Mazumder, Applied Physics Letters 128, 142905 (2026)

    2026

  58. [62]

    Akiyama, T

    M. Akiyama, T. Kamohara, K. Kano, A. Teshigahara, Y. Takeuchi, and N. Kawahara, Advanced Materials21, 593 (2009)

    2009

  59. [63]

    Huang, J

    J. Huang, J. Li, X. Guo, T. Wen, D. J. Srolovitz, Z. Chen, Z. Chen, and S. Liu, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 026801 (2026)

    2026

  60. [64]

    Zheng, C

    X. Zheng, C. Paillard, D. Wang, P. Chen, H. J. Zhao, Y. Xie, and L. Bellaiche, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 206102 (2026)

    2026

  61. [65]

    Anisotropic Short-Range Order Modulates Ferroelectric Switching in Wurtzite ScAlN Alloys

    L. M. Vogl, P. Schweizer, S. Chen, X. Jin, S.-Q. Yu, D. O. Byrne, F. I. Allen, J. Liu, T. Li, and A. M. Minor, Mi- croscopy and Microanalysis30, ozae044.565 (2024). Supporting Information of “Anisotropic Short-Range Order Modulates Ferroelectric Switching in Wurtzite ScAlN Alloys” Shunda Chen, 1,∗ Xianchao Dong, 1 Xiaochen Jin, 1 and Tianshu Li 1,† 1Depar...

    2024

  62. [66]

    Kresse and D

    G. Kresse and D. Joubert, Phys. Rev. B59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  63. [67]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Computational Materials Science6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  64. [68]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthm¨ uller, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  65. [69]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Hafner, Phys. Rev. B47, 558 (1993)

    1993

  66. [70]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  67. [71]

    H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Physical Review B13, 5188 (1976)

    1976

  68. [72]

    Zunger, S.-H

    A. Zunger, S.-H. Wei, L. G. Ferreira, and J. E. Bernard, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 353 (1990)

    1990

  69. [73]

    van de Walle, Calphad33, 266 (2009)

    A. van de Walle, Calphad33, 266 (2009)

    2009

  70. [74]

    van de Walle, P

    A. van de Walle, P. Tiwary, M. de Jong, D. Olmsted, M. Asta, A. Dick, D. Shin, Y. Wang, L.-Q. Chen, and Z.-K. Liu, Calphad42, 13 (2013)

    2013

  71. [75]

    Metropolis, A

    N. Metropolis, A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller, J. Chem. Phys.21, 1087 (1953)

    1953

  72. [76]

    B. Cao, S. Chen, X. Jin, J. Liu, and T. Li, ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces12, 57245 (2020)

    2020

  73. [77]

    X. Jin, S. Chen, and T. Li, Communications Materials3, 66 (2022)

    2022

  74. [78]

    S. Chen, X. Jin, W. Zhao, and T. Li, Physical Review Materials8, 043805 (2024)

    2024

  75. [79]

    Sheppard, P

    D. Sheppard, P. Xiao, W. Chemelewski, D. D. Johnson, and G. Henkelman, The Journal of Chemical Physics136, 074103 (2012)

    2012

  76. [80]

    Henkelman, B

    G. Henkelman, B. P. Uberuaga, and H. J´ onsson, The Journal of Chemical Physics113, 9901 (2000). ∗ shdchen@email.gwu.edu † tsli@email.gwu.edu

    2000