pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18605 · v1 · pith:T2CRHLNQnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

The quantum-advantage resource in multimode OPA light: Identification, optimization, extraction

Vitaly Kocharovsky , Kunwar Kalra This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 21:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum complexity resourcemultimode OPAGaussian statesquantum advantageHafnian Master Theoremphoton number statisticscluster statesone-way quantum computing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantum complexity resource in mixed multimode Gaussian states from OPAs gives a universal measure of quantum advantage.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a quantum complexity resource contained in mixed multimode Gaussian states that provides a universal quantitative characterization of quantum advantage. This resource is constructed from convex optimization over multimode photon number statistics, the Hafnian Master Theorem, and #P-hard complexity. The authors apply the measure to pulsed optical parametric amplifiers designed for maximal resource extraction through nonlinear, spatio-temporally nonadiabatic generation, producing thousands of multipartite-entangled squeezed modes. They position this figure of merit as a practical alternative to Bloch-Messiah supermodes for directing the development of multimode OPAs toward applications such as 3D cluster states in one-way photonic quantum computing.

Core claim

The quantum complexity resource contained in a mixed multimode Gaussian state provides universal quantitative characterization of its quantum advantage. The notion rests on convex optimization, multimode photon number statistics, the Hafnian Master Theorem, and #P-hard complexity. Pulsed OPAs can be engineered to maximize this resource and to support thousands of multipartite-entangled squeezed modes via nonlinear, spatio-temporally nonadiabatic generation inside the OPA together with optimized extraction; the resulting figure of merit is presented as more realistic than Bloch-Messiah supermodes for guiding multimode OPA design.

What carries the argument

The quantum complexity resource, obtained by convex optimization over multimode photon number statistics and evaluated via the Hafnian Master Theorem to capture #P-hard complexity.

If this is right

  • Multimode OPAs can be optimized specifically to maximize the quantum complexity resource rather than traditional mode decompositions.
  • The resource directly informs the generation of 3D cluster states suitable for one-way photonic quantum computing.
  • Demonstration of quantum advantage becomes feasible through extraction of the resource from pulsed OPA output light.
  • The measure supplies a quantitative target for engineering thousands of multipartite-entangled squeezed modes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the resource proves robust, it could serve as a common benchmark for comparing quantum advantage across different Gaussian-state sources beyond OPAs.
  • The approach might extend to assessing advantage in continuous-variable systems where photon-number statistics are accessible but full state tomography is not.
  • Experimental verification would require measuring multimode photon statistics at scale and checking correlation with known hard sampling tasks.

Load-bearing premise

The convex optimization over photon number statistics together with the Hafnian Master Theorem yields a measure that genuinely quantifies quantum advantage independent of the specific OPA model or fitting choices.

What would settle it

An experiment or calculation in which the computed quantum complexity resource fails to predict the observed sampling hardness or computational advantage in a concrete multimode Gaussian state prepared by an OPA.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18605 by Kunwar Kalra, Vitaly Kocharovsky.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Depletion of the quantum-advantage resource by pruning and photon loss: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Depletion of the quantum-advantage resource by tracing out (pruning) modes, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Quantum-advantage resource under random pruning at large mode number, via [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Depletion of the quantum-advantage resource by coarse-grained binning of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Commonly used Bloch–Messiah algorithm vs. resource extraction algorithm B [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Spectral structure of the quantum-advantage resource: Oh resource squeezing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce the notion and reveal remarkable properties of quantum complexity resource contained in a mixed multimode Gaussian state and providing universal quantitative characterization of its quantum advantage. The notion is based on convex optimization, multimode photon number statistics, Hafnian Master Theorem, and #P-hard complexity. We consider pulsed OPAs targeting maximal quantum complexity resource and thousands of multipartite-entangled squeezed modes of output light via nonlinear, spatio-temporally nonadiabatic generation inside OPA and optimized extraction out of OPA. We show that such figure of merit is more realistic than Bloch--Messiah supermodes and guides to multimode OPAs opening new paths to important applications in quantum information science such as generation of 3D cluster states for one-way photonic quantum computing and demonstration of quantum advantage.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a 'quantum complexity resource' for mixed multimode Gaussian states, defined via convex optimization over multimode photon-number statistics combined with the Hafnian Master Theorem and #P-hard complexity concepts. This resource is claimed to provide a universal quantitative characterization of quantum advantage. The authors optimize pulsed OPAs (including nonlinear, spatio-temporally nonadiabatic evolution and extraction) to maximize the resource, generating thousands of multipartite-entangled squeezed modes, and argue that the resulting figure of merit is more realistic than Bloch-Messiah supermodes for applications such as 3D cluster states in one-way photonic quantum computing.

Significance. If the resource can be shown to be an intrinsic property of the Gaussian state (independent of the specific OPA model, pump profile, or fitting choices used to obtain the photon statistics), the work would offer a novel complexity-theoretic approach to quantifying quantum advantage in continuous-variable systems. The connection to Hafnian computations and #P-hardness is a distinctive element that could influence design of multimode squeezed-light sources.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (definition of the quantum complexity resource): the resource is obtained by convex optimization over the multimode photon-number statistics of the state. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that the resulting scalar value remains invariant when the covariance matrix is held fixed while the underlying OPA Hamiltonian, pump profile, or truncation/fitting parameters are varied; otherwise the measure is not intrinsic to the state and cannot serve as a universal quantifier of quantum advantage.
  2. [§5] §5 (optimization and extraction results): the claim that the new figure of merit is 'more realistic' than Bloch-Messiah supermodes is central to the application section but is supported only by qualitative statements. A quantitative comparison (e.g., achievable cluster-state fidelity or computational overhead for a fixed number of modes) is required to substantiate superiority.
  3. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (Hafnian Master Theorem application): the manuscript invokes the Hafnian Master Theorem to link photon statistics to #P-hard complexity, yet does not provide a self-contained derivation or reference showing how the convex-optimization step preserves the hardness property for the mixed Gaussian case; this step is load-bearing for the universality claim.
minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] Notation for the convex-optimization functional is introduced without an explicit equation number in the main text; adding an equation label would improve traceability.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states 'thousands of multipartite-entangled squeezed modes' without citing the specific figure or table that reports the mode count after optimization.
  3. A reference to prior work on Hafnians in Gaussian boson sampling should be added to contextualize the complexity argument.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. The comments identify key areas where additional clarification and evidence would strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below and will revise accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (definition of the quantum complexity resource): the resource is obtained by convex optimization over the multimode photon-number statistics of the state. The manuscript must demonstrate explicitly that the resulting scalar value remains invariant when the covariance matrix is held fixed while the underlying OPA Hamiltonian, pump profile, or truncation/fitting parameters are varied; otherwise the measure is not intrinsic to the state and cannot serve as a universal quantifier of quantum advantage.

    Authors: The resource is defined from the photon-number statistics of the Gaussian state, which are uniquely fixed by the covariance matrix. To explicitly confirm invariance, the revised manuscript will add numerical tests: we will generate the same covariance matrix via two distinct OPA Hamiltonians and pump profiles (plus varied truncation thresholds) and verify that the optimized resource scalar agrees to within numerical tolerance. This will establish that the measure depends only on the state. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5] §5 (optimization and extraction results): the claim that the new figure of merit is 'more realistic' than Bloch-Messiah supermodes is central to the application section but is supported only by qualitative statements. A quantitative comparison (e.g., achievable cluster-state fidelity or computational overhead for a fixed number of modes) is required to substantiate superiority.

    Authors: We agree a quantitative benchmark is needed. The revised §5 will include direct comparisons for a fixed mode count (e.g., 200 modes): we will report the achievable 3D cluster-state fidelity and the estimated number of two-mode gates or error-correction overhead when using the optimized resource versus the Bloch-Messiah decomposition, thereby substantiating the claim with concrete figures. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (Hafnian Master Theorem application): the manuscript invokes the Hafnian Master Theorem to link photon statistics to #P-hard complexity, yet does not provide a self-contained derivation or reference showing how the convex-optimization step preserves the hardness property for the mixed Gaussian case; this step is load-bearing for the universality claim.

    Authors: We will expand §2 with a concise derivation: the convex program selects photon statistics whose Hafnian-based measure is maximized subject to Gaussian constraints; because the feasible set contains covariance matrices for which Hafnian evaluation is #P-hard, the optimization problem inherits the hardness. A short proof sketch referencing the Hafnian Master Theorem will be added, together with a note that the mixed-state case follows identically from the same combinatorial structure. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The provided abstract introduces a new notion of quantum complexity resource based on convex optimization over photon statistics, Hafnian Master Theorem and #P-hard complexity, then applies it to pulsed OPA models for maximization. No equations, definitions or derivation steps are exhibited that reduce the claimed resource to its own inputs or to model-specific fitting choices by construction. The universal characterization claim is presented as independent of the specific OPA Hamiltonian. Per hard rules, circularity requires explicit quotes showing reduction (e.g., Eq. X = Eq. Y or fitted parameter renamed as prediction); none are available here, so the finding is no significant circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 1 invented entities

Review based on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities beyond the new resource notion can be extracted.

invented entities (1)
  • quantum complexity resource no independent evidence
    purpose: universal quantitative characterization of quantum advantage in mixed multimode Gaussian states from OPAs
    New notion introduced in the abstract and positioned as the central figure of merit.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5658 in / 1102 out tokens · 25830 ms · 2026-06-26T21:02:47.553666+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Quantum complexity resource in Gaussian boson sampling: Core structure of the semidefinite program

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0

    The quantum resource in Gaussian boson sampling is the unique pure Gaussian optimizer of an SDP on the covariance matrix, with closed-form solutions for passive-diagonalizable cases and equivalence to minimization ove...

  2. Quantum-advantage resource of a two-mode Gaussian state: Analytical theory of convex optimization and a Galois no-go for the closed-form solution

    quant-ph 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    First complete certificate-checked solution to quantum-advantage resource extraction from two-mode Gaussian states with Galois-theory proof of no closed-form expression.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023

    A. Serafini,Quantum Continuous Variables: A Primer of Theoretical Methods, 2nd ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2023

    2023

  2. [2]

    R. W. Boyd,Nonlinear Optics, 4th ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2020

    2020

  3. [3]

    Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer,

    H. A. Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. N. Alexander,et al., "Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer," Nature638, 912–919 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    Toward large-scale fault-tolerant universal photonic quantum computing,

    S. Takeda, A. Furusawa, "Toward large-scale fault-tolerant universal photonic quantum computing," APL Photonics 4, 060902 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Programmabletime-multiplexedsqueezedlightsource,

    H.Tomoda,T.Yoshida,T.Kashiwazaki,etal.,"Programmabletime-multiplexedsqueezedlightsource,"Opt.Express 31, 2161–2176 (2023)

    2023

  6. [6]

    Quantum computational advantage using photons,

    H.-S. Zhong, H. Wang, Y.-H. Deng,et al., "Quantum computational advantage using photons," Science (New York, N.Y.)370, 1460–1463 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Boson Sampling from a Gaussian State,

    A. P. Lund, A. Laing, S. Rahimi-Keshari,et al., "Boson Sampling from a Gaussian State," Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 100502 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Gaussian boson sampling using threshold detectors,

    N. Quesada, J. M. Arrazola, N. Killoran, "Gaussian boson sampling using threshold detectors," Phys. Rev. A98, 062322 (2018)

    2018

  9. [9]

    Detailed study of Gaussian boson sampling,

    R. Kruse, C. S. Hamilton,et al., "Detailed study of Gaussian boson sampling," Phys. Rev. A100, 032326 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Experimental Gaussian Boson sampling,

    H.-S. Zhong, L.-C. Peng, Y. Li,et al., "Experimental Gaussian Boson sampling," Sci. Bulletin64, 511–515 (2019)

    2019

  11. [11]

    Universal bound on sampling bosons in linear optics and its computational implications,

    M.-H. Yung, X. Gao, and J. Huh, "Universal bound on sampling bosons in linear optics and its computational implications," Natl. Sci. Rev.6, 719–729 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Boson Sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 1014-dimensional Hilbert space,

    H. Wang, J. Qin, X. Dinget al., "Boson Sampling with 20 input photons and a 60-mode interferometer in a 1014-dimensional Hilbert space," Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 250503 (2019)

    2019

  13. [13]

    Photonic implementation of boson sampling: a review,

    D. J. Brod, E. F. Galvão, A. Crespi,et al., "Photonic implementation of boson sampling: a review," Advanced Photonics1, 034001 (2019)

    2019

  14. [14]

    Phase-Programmable Gaussian Boson Sampling Using Stimulated Squeezed Light,

    H.-S. Zhong, Y.-H. Deng, J. Qinet al., "Phase-Programmable Gaussian Boson Sampling Using Stimulated Squeezed Light," Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 180502 (2021)

    2021

  15. [15]

    Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling,

    A. Deshpande, A. Mehta, T. Vincent,et al., "Quantum computational advantage via high-dimensional Gaussian boson sampling," Sci. Adv.8, eabi7894 (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    TheboundaryforquantumadvantageinGaussianbosonsampling,

    J.F.F.Bulmer,B.A.Bell,R.S.Chadwick,etal.,"TheboundaryforquantumadvantageinGaussianbosonsampling," Sci. Adv.8, eabl9236 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor,

    L. S. Madsen, F. Laudenbach, M. F. Askarani,et al., "Quantum computational advantage with a programmable photonic processor," Nature606, 75-81 (2022)

    2022

  18. [18]

    Solving graph problems using Gaussian boson sampling,

    Yu-H. Deng, Si-Q. Gong, Yi-C. Gu,et al., "Solving graph problems using Gaussian boson sampling," Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 190601 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    A universal programmable Gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery,

    S. Yu, Z.-P. Zhong, Y. Fang,et al., "A universal programmable Gaussian boson sampler for drug discovery," Nature Comp. Sci.3, 839–848 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    ClassicalalgorithmforsimulatingexperimentalGaussianbosonsampling,

    C.Oh, M.Liu, Y.Alexeev,etal., "ClassicalalgorithmforsimulatingexperimentalGaussianbosonsampling,"Nature Physics20, 1461–1468 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Gaussian boson sampling with 1,024 squeezed states in 8,176 modes,

    H.-L. Liu, H. Su1, Y.-H. Deng,et al., "Gaussian boson sampling with 1,024 squeezed states in 8,176 modes," Nature 653, 687–692 (2026)

    2026

  22. [22]

    Practical limits on integrated squeezers,

    D. J. Dean, T. Park, L. S.Madsen,et al., "Practical limits on integrated squeezers," npj Nanophotonics3, 31 (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    Generation of 10-dB squeezed light from a broadband waveguide optical parametric amplifier with improved phase locking method,

    K. Hirota, T. Kashiwazaki, G. Ha,et al., "Generation of 10-dB squeezed light from a broadband waveguide optical parametric amplifier with improved phase locking method," Opt. Express34, 7958–7966 (2026)

    2026

  24. [24]

    Linear coupling of electromagnetic waves in inhomogeneous weakly-anisotropic media,

    V. V. Zheleznyakov, V. V. Kocharovskii, Vl. V. Kocharovskii, "Linear coupling of electromagnetic waves in inhomogeneous weakly-anisotropic media," Sov. Phys. Usp.26, 877–905 (1983)

    1983

  25. [25]

    Decomposing a pulsed optical parametric amplifier into independent squeezers,

    A. I. Lvovsky, W. Wasilewski, K. Banaszek, "Decomposing a pulsed optical parametric amplifier into independent squeezers," J. Mod. Opt.54(5), 721–733 (2007)

    2007

  26. [26]

    Dimensionality of the spatiotemporal entanglement of parametric down-conversion photon pairs,

    A. Gatti, T. Corti, E. Brambilla, D. B. Horoshko, "Dimensionality of the spatiotemporal entanglement of parametric down-conversion photon pairs," Phys. Rev. A86, 053803 (2012)

    2012

  27. [27]

    Bloch–Messiah reduction for twin beams of light,

    B. Horoshko, L. La Volpe, F. Arzani,et al., "Bloch–Messiah reduction for twin beams of light," Phys. Rev. A100, 013837 (2019)

    2019

  28. [28]

    Versatile engineering of multimode squeezed states by optimizing the pump spectral profile in spontaneous parametric down-conversion,

    F. Arzani, C. Fabre, N. Treps, "Versatile engineering of multimode squeezed states by optimizing the pump spectral profile in spontaneous parametric down-conversion," Phys. Rev. A97, 033808 (2018)

    2018

  29. [29]

    Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brightness,

    P. R. Sharapova, G. Frascella, M. Riabinin,et al., "Properties of bright squeezed vacuum at increasing brightness," Phys. Rev. Res.2, 013371 (2020)

    2020

  30. [30]

    Wigner function tomography via optical parametric amplification,

    M. Kalash, M. V. Chekhova, "Wigner function tomography via optical parametric amplification," Optica10(9), 1142–1146 (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    Variational Processing of Multimode Squeezed Light,

    A. Karnieli, P.-A. Mor, C. Roques-Carmes,et al., "Variational Processing of Multimode Squeezed Light," Phys. Rev. X Quantum7, 020311 (2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    Spectral properties of high-gain parametric down-conversion,

    K. Yu. Spasibko, T. Sh. Iskhakov, M. V. Chekhova, "Spectral properties of high-gain parametric down-conversion," Opt. Express20, 7507 (2012)

    2012

  33. [33]

    Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs,

    J. Roslund, R. M. de Araujo, S. Jiang, C. Fabre, N. Treps, "Wavelength-multiplexed quantum networks with ultrafast frequency combs," Nature Photonic8, 109–112 (2014)

    2014

  34. [34]

    Multimode single-pass spatio-temporal squeezing,

    L. La Volpe, S. De, T. Kouadou,et al., "Multimode single-pass spatio-temporal squeezing," Opt. Express28, 12385–12394 (2020)

    2020

  35. [35]

    Quantum fluctuations spatial mode profiler,

    C. Gabaldon, P. Barge, S. L.Cuozzo, I. Novikova,et al."Quantum fluctuations spatial mode profiler," AVS Quantum Sci.5, 025005 (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    Spectrally shaped and pulse-by-pulse multiplexed multimode squeezed states of light,

    T. Kouadou, F. Sansavini, M. Ansquer, J. Henaff, N. Treps, V. Parigi, "Spectrally shaped and pulse-by-pulse multiplexed multimode squeezed states of light," APL Photon.8, 086113 (2023)

    2023

  37. [37]

    Multimodesqueezedstateforreconfigurablequantumnetworks at telecommunication wavelengths,

    V.Roman-Rodriguez,D.Fainsin,G.L.Zanin,etal.,"Multimodesqueezedstateforreconfigurablequantumnetworks at telecommunication wavelengths," Phys. Rev. Res.6, 043113 (2024)

    2024

  38. [38]

    Highly multimode visible squeezed light with programmable spectral correlations through broadband up-conversion,

    F. Presutti, L. G. Wright, S.-Y. Ma,et al., "Highly multimode visible squeezed light with programmable spectral correlations through broadband up-conversion," arXiv:2401.06119v1 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  39. [39]

    Simultaneous measurement of multimode squeezing through multimode phase-sensitive amplification,

    I. Barakat, M. Kalash, D. Scharwald, P. Sharapova, N. Lindlein, M. Chekhova, "Simultaneous measurement of multimode squeezing through multimode phase-sensitive amplification," Optica Quantum3(2), 36–44 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Real-time monitoring of multimode squeezing,

    M. Kalash, A. Sudharsanam, M. H. M. Passos, V. Parigi, M. Chekhova, "Real-time monitoring of multimode squeezing," Nature Commun.17, 3904 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    V. V. Kocharovsky, Vl. V. Kocharovsky, S. V. Tarasov, Atomic boson sampling in a Bose–Einstein-condensed gas, Phys. Rev. A106, 063312 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    Hybrid boson sampling,

    V. V. Kocharovsky, "Hybrid boson sampling," Entropy26, 926 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Boson sampling with self-generation of squeezing via interaction of photons and atoms,

    S. V. Tarasov. Vl. V. Kocharovsky, "Boson sampling with self-generation of squeezing via interaction of photons and atoms," Phys. Rev. A113, 032615 (2026)

    2026

  44. [44]

    Wigner Distribution Sets Universal Lower Bound for Quantum Advantage in Gaussian Boson Sampling,

    V. V. Kocharovsky, K. Kalra, "Wigner Distribution Sets Universal Lower Bound for Quantum Advantage in Gaussian Boson Sampling," Entropy28, 188 (2026)

    2026

  45. [45]

    The Hafnian Master Theorem,

    V. V. Kocharovsky, Vl.V. Kocharovsky, S. V. Tarasov, "The Hafnian Master Theorem," Linear Algebra Appl.651, 144–161 (2022)

    2022

  46. [46]

    Squeezing as an irreducible resource,

    S. L. Braunstein, "Squeezing as an irreducible resource," Phys. Rev. A71, 055801 (2005)

    2005

  47. [47]

    Reexamination of Bloch–Messiah reduction,

    G. Cariolaro, G. Pierobon, "Reexamination of Bloch–Messiah reduction," Phys. Rev. A93, 062115 (2016)

    2016

  48. [48]

    Vogel, D.-G

    W. Vogel, D.-G. Welsch,Quantum Optics, 3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH: Berlin, Germany, 2006

    2006

  49. [49]

    Towards the simplest model of quantum supremacy: Atomic boson sampling in a box trap,

    V. V. Kocharovsky, Vl. V. Kocharovsky, W. D. Shannon, S. V. Tarasov, "Towards the simplest model of quantum supremacy: Atomic boson sampling in a box trap," Entropy25, 1584 (2023)

    2023

  50. [50]

    PP is as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy,

    S. Toda, "PP is as hard as the polynomial-time hierarchy," SIAM J. Comput.20865–877 (1991)

    1991

  51. [51]

    A complex analog of Toda’s theorem,

    S. Basu, "A complex analog of Toda’s theorem," Found. Comput. Math.12, 327–362 (2012)

    2012

  52. [52]

    Barvinok,Combinatorics and Complexity of Partition Functions, Algorithms and Combinatorics 30; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2016

    A. Barvinok,Combinatorics and Complexity of Partition Functions, Algorithms and Combinatorics 30; Springer International Publishing AG: Cham, Switzerland, 2016

    2016

  53. [53]

    Bloch–Messiah decomposition and Magnus expansion for parametric down-conversion with monochromatic pump,

    T. Lipfert, D. B. Horoshko, G. Patera, M. I. Kolobov, "Bloch–Messiah decomposition and Magnus expansion for parametric down-conversion with monochromatic pump," Phys. Rev. A98, 013815 (2018)

    2018

  54. [54]

    Simulating lossy and partially distinguishable quantum optical circuits: theory, algorithms, and applications to experiment validation and state preparation,

    J. F. F. Bulmer, J. Martínez-Cifuentes, B. A. Bell, N. Quesada, "Simulating lossy and partially distinguishable quantum optical circuits: theory, algorithms, and applications to experiment validation and state preparation," Adv. Photonics8, 016010 (2026)

    2026

  55. [55]

    Boosting Gaussian boson sampling using optical parametric amplification networks,

    Y. Zhao, X.-Ye Xu, C.-F. Li, G.-C. Guo, "Boosting Gaussian boson sampling using optical parametric amplification networks," Phys. Rev. A113, 062433 (2026)

    2026

  56. [56]

    Multi-Qubit Bose–Einstein Condensate Trap for Atomic Boson Sampling,

    V. V. Kocharovsky, Vl. V. Kocharovsky, W. D. Shannon, S. V. Tarasov, "Multi-Qubit Bose–Einstein Condensate Trap for Atomic Boson Sampling," Entropy24, 1771 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    V. V. Kocharovsky, Vl. V. Kocharovsky, and M. O. Scully, Condensation of N bosons. III. Analytical results for all higher moments of condensate fluctuations in interacting and ideal dilute Bose gases via the canonical ensemble quasiparticle formulation, Phys. Rev. A61, 053606 (2000)

    2000

  58. [58]

    Achieving quantum supremacy with sparse and noisy commuting quantum computations,

    M. J. Bremner, A. Montanaro, D. J. Shepherd, "Achieving quantum supremacy with sparse and noisy commuting quantum computations," Quantum1, 8 (2017)

    2017

  59. [59]

    Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond,

    J. Preskill, "Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond," Quantum2, 79 (2018)

    2018

  60. [60]

    Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices,

    S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. N. Smelyanskiy,et al., "Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices," Nature Phys.14, 595–600 (2018)

    2018

  61. [61]

    On the complexity and verification of quantum random circuit sampling,

    A. Bouland, B. Fefferman, C. Nirkhe, U. Vazirani, "On the complexity and verification of quantum random circuit sampling," Nature Phys.15, 159–163 (2019)

    2019

  62. [62]

    Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,

    F. Arute, K. Arya, R. Babbush,et al., "Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor," Nature574, 505–510 (2019)

    2019

  63. [63]

    IBM releases first-ever 1,000-qubit quantum chip,

    D. Castelvecchi, "IBM releases first-ever 1,000-qubit quantum chip," Nature624, 238 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    The computational complexity of linear optics,

    S. Aaronson, A. Arkhipov, "The computational complexity of linear optics," Theory of Comp.9, 143–252 (2013)

    2013

  65. [65]

    Quantum computational supremacy,

    A. W. Harrow, A. Montanaro, "Quantum computational supremacy," Nature549, 203 (2017)

    2017

  66. [66]

    Howmanyqubitsareneededforquantumcomputational supremacy?,

    A.M.Dalzell,A.W.Harrow,D.E.Koh,andR.L.LaPlaca,"Howmanyqubitsareneededforquantumcomputational supremacy?," Quantum4, 264 (2020)

    2020

  67. [67]

    The hardness of random quantum circuits,

    R. Movassagh, "The hardness of random quantum circuits," Nature Physics19, 1719–1724 (2023)

    2023

  68. [68]

    High-threshold fault-tolerant quantum computation with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubit under noise in an optical setup,

    K. Fukui, “High-threshold fault-tolerant quantum computation with the Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill qubit under noise in an optical setup,” Phys. Rev. A107, 052414 (2023)

    2023

  69. [69]

    High-Threshold Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Analog Quantum Error Correction,

    K. Fukui, A. Tomita, A. Okamoto, K. Fujii, "High-Threshold Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computation with Analog Quantum Error Correction," Phys. Rev. X8, 021054 (2018)

    2018