pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.18991 · v1 · pith:6WQ5FHWAnew · submitted 2026-06-17 · 🪐 quant-ph

Measurement-enabled online quantum processing with amplitude encoding

Giacomo Franceschetto , Pere Mujal , Rodrigo Mart\'inez-Pe\~na This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 20:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum reservoir computingamplitude encodingmid-circuit measurementonline processingpartial trace dynamicsquantum hardwarereservoir observables
0
0 comments X

The pith

Mid-circuit measurements and resets implement amplitude encoding for online quantum reservoir computing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a protocol that performs amplitude encoding on quantum hardware while keeping the computation online. Mid-circuit measurement and reset operations realize the partial-trace dynamics required for amplitude encoding. An indirect measurement scheme accesses reservoir observables without stopping the temporal processing. This keeps runtime linear in the number of time steps and avoids input buffering. The approach is formulated theoretically, implemented on hardware, and tested on benchmark tasks, allowing monitoring of both input and memory qubits.

Core claim

The protocol combines mid-circuit measurement and reset operations to implement the partial-trace dynamics underlying amplitude encoding, while an indirect measurement scheme provides access to reservoir observables without interrupting temporal processing. In contrast to other approaches, the method preserves online operation, avoids input buffering, and keeps the runtime linear in the number of time steps.

What carries the argument

Mid-circuit measurement and reset operations that realize partial-trace dynamics for amplitude encoding, paired with an indirect measurement scheme for accessing reservoir observables.

If this is right

  • Reservoir dynamics can be monitored through both direct measurements of the input qubits and indirect measurements of the memory qubits.
  • The full system can be observed while isolating the internal evolution of the reservoir.
  • The approach provides a practical route toward scalable hardware implementations of amplitude-encoded quantum reservoir computing.
  • Systematic experimental studies of complex quantum reservoirs become feasible.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same mid-circuit technique might apply to other online quantum machine learning models that rely on partial traces.
  • If hardware fidelity improves, the linear runtime could support longer temporal sequences than buffering-based methods.
  • Comparing direct versus indirect measurement accuracy on noisy hardware would test whether the indirect scheme truly isolates internal evolution.

Load-bearing premise

Mid-circuit measurement and reset operations on current quantum hardware can be performed with fidelity high enough to preserve the intended partial-trace reservoir dynamics.

What would settle it

An experiment in which reservoir performance on benchmark tasks degrades nonlinearly with added time steps due to accumulated errors from mid-circuit operations would show the dynamics are not preserved.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.18991 by Giacomo Franceschetto, Pere Mujal, Rodrigo Mart\'inez-Pe\~na.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: Quantum reservoir computing scheme for the online protocol using amplitude encoding. (a) The complete [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: Comparison of expectation values obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: Capacity of the hardware-tailored reservoir [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5: Comparison of expectation values obtained [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4: Optimization of the measurement strength with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6: All combinations of the output layer for Santa [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce a quantum reservoir computing online protocol that realizes amplitude encoding on quantum hardware. Our scheme combines mid-circuit measurement and reset operations to implement the partial-trace dynamics underlying amplitude encoding, while an indirect measurement scheme provides access to reservoir observables without interrupting temporal processing. In contrast to other approaches, our method preserves online operation, avoids input buffering, and keeps the runtime linear in the number of time steps. We present the theoretical formulation of the protocol and a proof-of-principle implementation on quantum hardware, and we evaluate its performance on two standard benchmark tasks. Our results show that the reservoir dynamics can be monitored through both direct measurements of the input qubits and indirect measurements of the memory qubits, enabling observation of the full system while isolating the internal evolution of the reservoir. This work provides a practical route toward scalable hardware implementations of amplitude-encoded quantum reservoir computing and opens the door to systematic experimental studies of complex quantum reservoirs.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces an online quantum reservoir computing protocol that realizes amplitude encoding via mid-circuit measurements and resets to implement the required partial-trace dynamics. An indirect measurement scheme is used to access reservoir observables without interrupting temporal processing. The approach is claimed to preserve online operation, avoid input buffering, and achieve runtime linear in the number of time steps. The paper provides a theoretical formulation, a proof-of-principle demonstration on quantum hardware, and performance evaluation on two standard benchmark tasks, with results indicating that reservoir dynamics can be monitored via both direct input-qubit measurements and indirect memory-qubit measurements.

Significance. If the experimental results hold, the work supplies a practical route to scalable amplitude-encoded quantum reservoir computing on near-term hardware. The explicit experimental validation on quantum hardware, combined with the linear-runtime online protocol, constitutes a falsifiable test of the central construction and strengthens the case for hardware-feasible quantum reservoirs.

minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract refers to 'two standard benchmark tasks' without naming them; these should be identified explicitly in the abstract or introduction to allow readers to assess the scope of the evaluation immediately.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels in the hardware-results section should include error bars or uncertainty quantification to make the comparison between direct and indirect measurements fully interpretable.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, the assessment of significance, and the recommendation of minor revision. No major comments are listed in the report, so we have no specific points requiring rebuttal or clarification at this stage. We will incorporate any minor suggestions during revision.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: protocol is a direct construction

full rationale

The paper introduces a new quantum reservoir computing protocol that combines mid-circuit measurement and reset to realize partial-trace dynamics for amplitude encoding, plus an indirect measurement scheme. No load-bearing equations, fitted parameters, or predictions are described that reduce by construction to the inputs; the runtime linearity and online operation follow directly from the stated operations without self-referential definitions or self-citation chains. The derivation is self-contained as an explicit hardware construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; no explicit free parameters, invented entities, or non-standard axioms are stated. The protocol implicitly rests on standard quantum measurement theory and the assumption that partial-trace dynamics can be realized via mid-circuit operations.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard postulates of quantum mechanics, including the effect of projective measurement and partial trace on density operators
    The protocol relies on these to implement amplitude encoding via mid-circuit measurement and reset.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5683 in / 1307 out tokens · 23937 ms · 2026-06-26T20:22:42.260025+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Ghosh, K

    S. Ghosh, K. Nakajima, T. Krisnanda, K. Fujii, and T. C. H. Liew, Quantum neuromorphic computing with reservoir computing networks, Adv. Quantum Technol. 4, 2100053 (2021)

    2021

  2. [2]

    Mujal, R

    P. Mujal, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, J. Nokkala, J. Garc´ ıa-Beni, G. L. Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Oppor- tunities in quantum reservoir computing and extreme learning machines, Adv. Quantum Technol.4, 2100027 (2021)

    2021

  3. [3]

    Fujii and K

    K. Fujii and K. Nakajima, Harnessing disordered- ensemble quantum dynamics for machine learning, Phys. Rev. Appl.8, 024030 (2017)

    2017

  4. [4]

    Nakajima, K

    K. Nakajima, K. Fujii, M. Negoro, K. Mitarai, and M. Kitagawa, Boosting computational power through spatial multiplexing in quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. Appl.11, 034021 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Chen and H

    J. Chen and H. I. Nurdin, Learning nonlinear input– output maps with dissipative quantum systems, Quan- tum Inf. Process.18, 1 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    Kutvonen, K

    A. Kutvonen, K. Fujii, and T. Sagawa, Optimizing a quantum reservoir computer for time series prediction, Sci. Rep.10, 1 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Q. H. Tran and K. Nakajima, Higher-order quantum reservoir computing, arXiv:2006.08999 (2020)

    arXiv 2006

  8. [8]

    Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, J

    R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, J. Nokkala, G. L. Giorgi, R. Zambrini, and M. C. Soriano, Information processing capacity of spin-based quantum reservoir computing systems, Cogn. Comput. , 1 (2020)

    2020

  9. [9]

    Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, G

    R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, G. L. Giorgi, J. Nokkala, M. C. So- riano, and R. Zambrini, Dynamical phase transitions in quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 100502 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Nokkala, R

    J. Nokkala, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, G. L. Giorgi, V. Pa- rigi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Gaussian states of continuous-variable quantum systems provide univer- sal and versatile reservoir computing, Commun. Phys.4, 1 (2021)

    2021

  11. [11]

    Nokkala, R

    J. Nokkala, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, R. Zambrini, and M. C. Soriano, High-performance reservoir computing with fluctuations in linear networks, IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.33, 2664 (2022)

    2022

  12. [12]

    Mujal, J

    P. Mujal, J. Nokkala, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, G. L. Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Analytical evidence of nonlinearity in qubits and continuous-variable quan- tum reservoir computing, J. Phys.: Complex.2, 045008 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    W. Xia, J. Zou, X. Qiu, and X. Li, The reservoir learn- ing power across quantum many-body localization tran- sition, Front. Phys.17, 1 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Mujal, Quantum reservoir computing for speckle dis- order potentials, Condens

    P. Mujal, Quantum reservoir computing for speckle dis- order potentials, Condens. Matter7, 17 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Vintskevich and D

    S. Vintskevich and D. Grigoriev, Computing with two quantum reservoirs connected via optimized two-qubit nonselective measurements, inQuantum 2.0(Optica Publishing Group, 2022) pp. QW2A–48

    2022

  16. [16]

    W. Xia, J. Zou, X. Qiu, F. Chen, B. Zhu, C. Li, D.-L. Deng, and X. Li, Configured quantum reservoir comput- ing for multi-task machine learning, Sci. Bull.68, 2321 (2023)

    2023

  17. [17]

    Llodr` a, C

    G. Llodr` a, C. Charalambous, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zam- brini, Benchmarking the role of particle statistics in quantum reservoir computing, Adv. Quantum Technol. 6, 2200100 (2023)

    2023

  18. [18]

    Mujal, R

    P. Mujal, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, G. L. Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Time-series quantum reservoir comput- ing with weak and projective measurements, Npj Quan- tum Inf.9, 16 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    G¨ otting, F

    N. G¨ otting, F. Lohof, and C. Gies, Exploring quantum- ness in quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. A108, 052427 (2023)

    2023

  20. [20]

    Mlika, S

    Z. Mlika, S. Cherkaoui, J. F. Laprade, and S. Corbeil- Letourneau, User trajectory prediction in mobile wire- less networks using quantum reservoir computing, IET Quantum Commun.4, 125 (2023)

    2023

  21. [21]

    Garc´ ıa-Beni, G

    J. Garc´ ıa-Beni, G. L. Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zam- brini, Scalable photonic platform for real-time quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 014051 (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    Domingo, M

    L. Domingo, M. Grande, G. Carlo, F. Borondo, and J. Borondo, Optimal quantum reservoir computing for market forecasting: An application to fight food price crises, arXiv:2401.03347 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Kobayashi and Y

    K. Kobayashi and Y. Motome, Quantum reservoir prob- ing: An inverse paradigm of quantum reservoir comput- ing for exploring quantum many-body physics, SciPost Phys.18, 198 (2025)

    2025

  24. [24]

    Nokkala, G

    J. Nokkala, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Retriev- ing past quantum features with deep hybrid classical- quantum reservoir computing, Mach. Learn.: Sci. Tech- nol.5, 035022 (2024)

    2024

  25. [25]

    Garc´ ıa-Beni, G

    J. Garc´ ıa-Beni, G. Luca Giorgi, M. C. Soriano, and R. Zambrini, Squeezing as a resource for time series pro- cessing in quantum reservoir computing, Opt. Express 32, 6733 (2024)

    2024

  26. [26]

    Palacios, R

    A. Palacios, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, M. C. Soriano, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Role of coherence in many- body quantum reservoir computing, Commun. Phys.7, 369 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    ˇCindrak, B

    S. ˇCindrak, B. Donvil, K. L¨ udge, and L. Jaurigue, En- hancing the performance of quantum reservoir comput- ing and solving the time-complexity problem by artificial memory restriction, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 013051 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Kobayashi, Q

    S. Kobayashi, Q. H. Tran, and K. Nakajima, Coherence influx is indispensable for quantum reservoir computing, arXiv:2409.12693 (2024)

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Kobayashi, Q

    S. Kobayashi, Q. H. Tran, and K. Nakajima, Extend- ing echo state property for quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. E110, 024207 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Llodr` a, P

    G. Llodr` a, P. Mujal, R. Zambrini, and G. L. Giorgi, Quantum reservoir computing in atomic lattices, Chaos Solitons Fractals195, 116289 (2025)

    2025

  31. [31]

    Hahto and J

    M. Hahto and J. Nokkala, Smarter usage of measure- ment statistics can greatly improve continuous variable quantum reservoir computing, New J. Phys.27, 094510 (2025)

    2025

  32. [32]

    M. N. Ivaki, A. Lazarides, and T. Ala-Nissila, Quantum reservoir computing on random regular graphs, Phys. Rev. A112, 012622 (2025)

    2025

  33. [33]

    ˇCindrak, L

    S. ˇCindrak, L. Jaurigue, and K. L¨ udge, Engineering quantum reservoirs through krylov complexity, expressiv- ity, and observability, Phys. Rev. Res.7, 043190 (2025)

    2025

  34. [34]

    ˇCindrak, K

    S. ˇCindrak, K. L¨ udge, and L. Jaurigue, From krylov com- plexity to observability: Capturing phase space dimen- 7 sion with applications in quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L042039 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    Sch¨ utte, N

    N.-E. Sch¨ utte, N. G¨ otting, H. M¨ untinga, C. Gies, and M. List, Expressive limits of quantum reservoir comput- ing, inQuantum Computing, Communication, and Sim- ulation V(SPIE, 2025) p. PC133910M

    2025

  36. [36]

    Steinegger and C

    J. Steinegger and C. R¨ ath, Predicting three-dimensional chaotic systems with four qubit quantum systems, Sci. Rep.15, 6201 (2025)

    2025

  37. [37]

    Kora and C

    Y. Kora and C. Simon, Statistical noise enhances quan- tumness benefits in spin-network quantum reservoir com- puting, arXiv:2504.17837 (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Sasaki, R

    D. Sasaki, R. Koga, T. Kuroiwa, Y. Ito, C.-C. Chen, and T. Sogabe, Hamiltonian-driven architec- tures for non-markovian quantum reservoir computing, arXiv:2505.14450 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Kobayashi and Y

    K. Kobayashi and Y. Motome, Quantum reservoir prob- ing of quantum phase transitions, Nat. Commun.16, 3871 (2025)

    2025

  40. [40]

    Kobayashi and Y

    K. Kobayashi and Y. Motome, Edge of many-body quan- tum chaos in quantum reservoir computing, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 040602 (2026)

    2026

  41. [41]

    Sannia, G

    A. Sannia, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Exponential concentration and symmetries in quantum reservoir com- puting, arXiv:2505.10062 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  42. [42]

    Xiong, Z

    W. Xiong, Z. Holmes, A. Angrisani, Y. Suzuki, T. Chotibut, and S. Thanasilp, Role of scrambling and noise in temporal information processing with quantum systems, arXiv:2505.10080 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    Askari, Y

    S. Askari, Y. Kora, and C. Simon, Spin-network quantum reservoir computing with distributed inputs: The role of entanglement, arXiv:2511.04900 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    Jain and R

    V. Jain and R. Maulik, Higher order quantum reser- voir computing for non-intrusive reduced-order models, inAIAA SCITECH 2026 Forum(2026) p. 1419

    2026

  45. [45]

    Kawanabe, S

    M. Kawanabe, S. Cindrak, K. Luedge, J.-i. Shirakashi, T. Shibuya, and H. Imai, Efficient time-series prediction on nisq devices via time-delayed quantum extreme learn- ing machine, arXiv:2602.21544 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    ˇCindrak, L

    S. ˇCindrak, L. Giebeler, N. G¨ otting, C. Gies, and K. L¨ udge, Memory-nonlinearity trade-off across quan- tum reservoir computing frameworks, arXiv:2603.21371 (2026)

    arXiv 2026

  47. [47]

    P. Sun, L. Wang, L.-J. Kong, Y. Sun, and X. Zhang, Correlated optical reservoir computing, Laser Photonics Rev. , e01823 (2026)

    2026

  48. [48]

    Franceschetto, M

    G. Franceschetto, M. P lodzie´ n, M. Lewenstein, A. Ac´ ın, and P. Mujal, Harnessing quantum backaction for time- series processing, Phys. Rev. X16, 021002 (2026)

    2026

  49. [49]

    F. Hu, S. A. Khan, N. T. Bronn, G. Angelatos, G. E. Rowlands, G. J. Ribeill, and H. E. T¨ ureci, Overcoming the coherence time barrier in quantum machine learning on temporal data, Nat. Commun.15, 7491 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    Hamhoum, S

    W. Hamhoum, S. Cherkaoui, J.-F. Laprade, O. Ahmed, and S. Wang, Multivariate time series forecasting with gate-based quantum reservoir computing on nisq hard- ware, arXiv:2510.13634 (2025)

    arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    J. Chen, H. I. Nurdin, and N. Yamamoto, Temporal in- formation processing on noisy quantum computers, Phys. Rev. Appl.14, 024065 (2020)

    2020

  52. [52]

    Yasuda, Y

    T. Yasuda, Y. Suzuki, T. Kubota, K. Nakajima, Q. Gao, W. Zhang, S. Shimono, H. I. Nurdin, and N. Yamamoto, Quantum reservoir computing with repeated measure- ments on superconducting devices, arXiv:2310.06706 (2023)

    arXiv 2023

  53. [53]

    Ricci, F

    E. Ricci, F. Monzani, L. Nigro, and E. Prati, Quantum reservoir computing induced by controllable damping, Npj Quantum Inf. 10.1038/s41534-026-01229-8 (2026)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41534-026-01229-8 2026

  54. [54]

    Negoro, K

    M. Negoro, K. Mitarai, K. Nakajima, and K. Fujii, To- ward nmr quantum reservoir computing, inReservoir computing: theory, physical implementations, and appli- cations(Springer, 2021) pp. 451–458

    2021

  55. [55]

    Sannia, R

    A. Sannia, R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, M. C. Soriano, G. L. Giorgi, and R. Zambrini, Dissipation as a resource for quantum reservoir computing, Quantum8, 1291 (2024)

    2024

  56. [56]

    Polch´ e, V

    M. Polch´ e, V. Puram, A. Lal, W. Golletz, J. ´E. Arrow, V. Sahgal, K. Ghosh, G. Cortiana, and C. O’Meara, Hybrid quantum-classical machine learning algorithms for multi-output time-series forecasting at utility scale, arXiv:2605.24252 (2026)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    H¨ ubner, N

    U. H¨ ubner, N. B. Abraham, and C. O. Weiss, Dimen- sions and entropies of chaotic intensity pulsations in a single-mode far-infrared nh3 laser, Phys. Rev. A40, 6354 (1989)

    1989

  58. [58]

    Weigend and N

    A. Weigend and N. Gershenfeld, Results of the time series prediction competition at the santa fe institute, inIEEE International Conference on Neural Networks(1993) pp. 1786–1793 vol.3

    1993

  59. [59]

    Jaeger,Short Term Memory in Echo State Networks, Tech

    H. Jaeger,Short Term Memory in Echo State Networks, Tech. Rep. GMD Report 152 (GMD Forschungszentrum Informationstechnik GmbH, 2002). [60]https://github.com/GiacomoFrn/online_FN_qrc

    2002

  60. [60]

    A. D. C´ orcoles, M. Takita, K. Inoue, S. Lekuch, Z. K. Minev, J. M. Chow, and J. M. Gambetta, Exploiting dynamic quantum circuits in a quantum algorithm with superconducting qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 100501 (2021)

    2021

  61. [61]

    J. M. Pino, J. M. Dreiling, C. Figgatt, J. P. Gaebler, S. A. Moses, M. Allman, C. Baldwin, M. Foss-Feig, D. Hayes, K. Mayer,et al., Demonstration of the trapped-ion quan- tum ccd computer architecture, Nature592, 209 (2021)

    2021

  62. [62]

    DeCross, E

    M. DeCross, E. Chertkov, M. Kohagen, and M. Foss-Feig, Qubit-reuse compilation with mid-circuit measurement and reset, Phys. Rev. X13, 041057 (2023)

    2023

  63. [63]

    Y. Yu, K. Yan, D. Biswas, V. N. Zhang, B. Harraz, C. Noel, C. Monroe, and A. Kozhanov, In situ mid- circuit qubit measurement and reset in a single-species trapped-ion quantum computing system, Phys. Rev. Res. 7, 043355 (2025)

    2025

  64. [64]

    T. M. Graham, L. Phuttitarn, R. Chinnarasu, Y. Song, C. Poole, K. Jooya, J. Scott, A. Scott, P. Eichler, and M. Saffman, Midcircuit measurements on a single-species neutral alkali atom quantum processor, Phys. Rev. X13, 041051 (2023)

    2023

  65. [65]

    J. W. Lis, A. Senoo, W. F. McGrew, F. R¨ onchen, A. Jenkins, and A. M. Kaufman, Midcircuit operations using the omg architecture in neutral atom arrays, Phys. Rev. X13, 041035 (2023)

    2023

  66. [66]

    Norcia, W

    M. Norcia, W. Cairncross, K. Barnes, P. Battaglino, A. Brown, M. Brown, K. Cassella, C.-A. Chen, R. Coxe, D. Crow,et al., Midcircuit qubit measurement and rear- rangement in a yb 171 atomic array, Phys. Rev. X13, 041034 (2023)

    2023

  67. [67]

    Motlakunta, N

    S. Motlakunta, N. Kotibhaskar, C.-Y. Shih, A. Vogliano, D. McLaren, L. Hahn, J. Zhu, R. Habl¨ utzel, and R. Islam, Preserving a qubit during state-destroying operations on an adjacent qubit at a few micrometers distance, Nat. 8 Commun.15, 6575 (2024)

    2024

  68. [68]

    Foss-Feig, G

    M. Foss-Feig, G. Pagano, A. C. Potter, and N. Y. Yao, Progress in trapped-ion quantum simulation, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.16, 145–172 (2025)

    2025

  69. [69]

    Franceschetto, P

    G. Franceschetto, P. Mujal Torreblanca, and R. Mart´ ınez-Pe˜ na, Simulations and experimental data for ”online processing with an amplitude encoding scheme”, 10.5281/zenodo.20399163 (2026). End Matter Indirect measurement optimization.—Similar to [48], we search the optimal values of the measurement strength for each task in Fig. 4. To efficiently perfor...

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.20399163 2026