Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 1 minor 3 cited by

Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in Rashba superconductors

T0 review · 1 major / 1 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Higher-order Lifshitz invariants in Rashba superconductors produce critical-current nonreciprocity and magnetochiral anisotropy.

desk verdict The paper uses symmetry to build higher-order Lifshitz invariants for Rashba superconductors and feeds them into a fluctuation TDGL to predict nonreciprocal current below Tc and magnetochiral anisotropy above it. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.19421 v1 pith:WA7HROCE submitted 2026-06-17 cond-mat.supr-con

Joaquim Telles de Miranda , Maxim Khodas , Alex Levchenko This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.supr-con
keywords RashbasuperconductorsmagnetochiralanisotropynonreciprocaltransportLifshitzinvariantsGinzburg-Landautheoryfluctuationeffectscriticalcurrent
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper establishes that symmetry-allowed higher-order Lifshitz invariants in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors with Rashba spin-orbit coupling generate nonreciprocal charge transport. In the superconducting state these terms make the critical current direction-dependent, while near the transition in the normal state they produce a pronounced magnetochiral anisotropy. The authors use group-theoretical methods to identify the allowed invariants and apply a generalized time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory that includes Aslamazov-Larkin and Maki-Thompson fluctuation contributions to compute the nonlinear response, further examining how disorder and dephasing modify the effect.

What carries the argument

Higher-order Lifshitz invariants, the symmetry-allowed terms whose vector structure determines the nonreciprocal current.

What would settle it

Measurement of strictly reciprocal critical currents and absence of magnetochiral anisotropy in a clean Rashba superconductor near its transition would falsify the predicted nonreciprocity.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Symmetry-constrained group-theoretical methods identify the allowed higher-order Lifshitz invariants whose vector structure yields a nonreciprocal current; in the superconducting state this structure produces critical-current nonreciprocity while in the fluctuation regime near the transition the same invariants generate magnetochiral anisotropy, with the magnitude and sign of both effects obtained from a generalized time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau functional that incorporates Aslamazov-Larkin and Maki-Thompson diagrams and accounts for disorder scattering and dephasing.

Load-bearing premise

The generalized time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau functional with Aslamazov-Larkin and Maki-Thompson terms captures the nonlinear transport without higher-order corrections or unaccounted microscopic processes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The critical current becomes direction-dependent once the higher-order invariants are included.
  • A finite magnetochiral anisotropy appears in the normal-state fluctuation regime.
  • Disorder scattering and dephasing suppress or modify the magnitude of the nonreciprocal response.
  • The vector form of the nonreciprocal current is fixed by the symmetry of the Rashba system.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar nonreciprocity may appear in other noncentrosymmetric superconductors once their Lifshitz invariants are enumerated.
  • The same framework could be used to predict nonreciprocal effects in hybrid structures that combine Rashba layers with conventional superconductors.
  • Experimental tuning of disorder or dephasing time could serve as a direct test of the relative weight of Aslamazov-Larkin versus Maki-Thompson channels.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that higher-order Lifshitz invariants allowed by symmetry in 2D Rashba superconductors give rise to critical current nonreciprocity below Tc and pronounced magnetochiral anisotropy above Tc near the transition. These are derived using group-theoretical methods to construct the invariants and a generalized time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau (TDGL) functional incorporating Aslamazov-Larkin (AL) and Maki-Thompson (MT) contributions to describe the nonlinear transport, with further analysis of disorder scattering and dephasing effects.

Significance. If the central results hold, the work offers a systematic symmetry-based approach to nonreciprocal charge transport in noncentrosymmetric superconductors, potentially explaining experimental observations of magnetochiral anisotropy in the fluctuation regime. The explicit construction of Lifshitz invariants and inclusion of both AL and MT diagrams represent a solid theoretical contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [generalized TDGL application] The generalized TDGL section states that AL and MT diagrams are used to capture nonlinear conductivity in the fluctuation regime, but provides no explicit argument or calculation showing that these exhaust the relevant contributions; higher-order fluctuation vertices or additional disorder-induced terms could modify the vector structure or magnitude of the magnetochiral anisotropy (both below and above Tc). This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract paragraph on TDGL application could explicitly note the order in fluctuation expansion at which the nonreciprocal terms appear.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional justification while preserving the core results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The generalized TDGL section states that AL and MT diagrams are used to capture nonlinear conductivity in the fluctuation regime, but provides no explicit argument or calculation showing that these exhaust the relevant contributions; higher-order fluctuation vertices or additional disorder-induced terms could modify the vector structure or magnitude of the magnetochiral anisotropy (both below and above Tc). This assumption is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit justification for the sufficiency of the AL and MT diagrams is warranted and was not provided in the original manuscript. In the revised version we will add a concise paragraph (with supporting references to the standard literature on paraconductivity) explaining that, within the Gaussian fluctuation regime close to Tc, these diagrams furnish the leading contributions to the nonlinear conductivity; higher-order vertices are suppressed by additional powers of the small parameter (T-Tc)/Tc and do not alter the symmetry-allowed vector structure dictated by the Lifshitz invariants. We will also clarify that the critical-current nonreciprocity below Tc follows directly from the equilibrium Ginzburg-Landau free energy containing the higher-order invariants and does not rely on the fluctuation diagrams. The above-Tc magnetochiral anisotropy is therefore the only quantity computed via generalized TDGL. This is a partial revision: the calculations themselves remain unchanged, but the presentation and supporting discussion will be strengthened. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: symmetry + standard TDGL yields independent result

full rationale

The derivation begins from symmetry-allowed higher-order Lifshitz invariants constructed via group theory, then inserts them into a generalized TDGL functional that includes the standard Aslamazov-Larkin and Maki-Thompson diagrams plus disorder/dephasing analysis. No quoted equation reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing step rest on a self-citation chain whose content is unverified. The abstract and described method treat the nonreciprocal current as an output of the symmetry-constrained functional rather than an input renamed or refitted. This is the normal non-circular case for a symmetry-plus-fluctuation calculation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard symmetry assumptions of noncentrosymmetric crystals with Rashba SOC and the validity of the TDGL expansion in the fluctuation regime; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Symmetry constraints from the noncentrosymmetric point group with Rashba spin-orbit coupling determine the allowed higher-order Lifshitz invariants
    Invoked to construct the vector structure of the nonreciprocal current (abstract, symmetry-constrained group-theoretical methods paragraph)
  • domain assumption Generalized time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory incorporating Aslamazov-Larkin and Maki-Thompson contributions describes nonlinear transport near Tc
    Used to analyze the fluctuation-regime magnetochiral anisotropy (abstract, TDGL paragraph)

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in Rashba superconductors." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WA7HROCE

@misc{pith2026260619421,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Electrical magnetochiral anisotropy in Rashba superconductors},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WA7HROCE}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.19421}
}
read the original abstract

We theoretically investigate the role of higher-order Lifshitz invariants in nonreciprocal charge transport in two-dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors with Rashba spin-orbit coupling. In the superconducting state, these symmetry-allowed terms give rise to critical-current nonreciprocity, while in the normal state near the superconducting transition they generate a pronounced magnetochiral anisotropy. Using symmetry-constrained group-theoretical methods, we systematically construct the allowed Lifshitz invariants and derive the corresponding vector structure of the nonreciprocal current. To describe nonlinear transport in the fluctuation regime, we apply a generalized time-dependent Ginzburg-Landau theory that incorporates both the Aslamazov-Larkin contribution from fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs and the Maki-Thompson contribution associated with quantum interference in the Cooper channel. We further analyze the effects of disorder scattering and dephasing on the resulting nonreciprocal response.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fluctuation-Induced Magnetoelectric Effect in Noncentrosymmetric Superconductors

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 7.0 of 10

    Superconducting fluctuations induce a magnetoelectric term in spin susceptibility via fluctuation-induced Cooper pairs in noncentrosymmetric superconductors, possible even for s-wave pairing.

  2. Effect of superconducting fluctuations on nonreciprocal dichroism and gyrotropy

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-07 accept novelty 6.5 of 10

    Fluctuating Cooper pairs above Tc produce closed-form nonreciprocal dichroism and gyrotropic birefringence that diverge as 1/(T−Tc) and require particle-hole asymmetry plus a cubic Lifshitz invariant.

  3. Kinetic Lifshitz invariants and dynamics of nonreciprocal fluctuations in superconductors

    cond-mat.supr-con 2026-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A Keldysh derivation shows disordered Rashba superconductors have nonreciprocal fluctuation dynamics: the relaxation rate and noise power acquire a term odd in pair momentum and magnetic field, alongside a universal d...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    Symmetry of bands in wurzite-type crystals. 1. symmetry of bands disregarding spin-orbit interaction,

    E. I. Rashba, “Symmetry of bands in wurzite-type crystals. 1. symmetry of bands disregarding spin-orbit interaction,” Sov. Phys. Solid. State1, 368 (1959)

    1959

  2. [2]

    Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,

    Yu. A. Bychkov and E. I. Rashba, “Properties of a 2D electron gas with lifted spectral degeneracy,” Sov. Phys. JETP Lett.39, 66 (1984)

    1984

  3. [3]

    Electrical mag- netochiral anisotropy,

    G. L. J. A. Rikken, J. F ¨olling, and P. Wyder, “Electrical mag- netochiral anisotropy,” Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 236602 (2001)

    2001

  4. [4]

    Magnetoelectric anisotropy in diffusive transport,

    G. L. J. A. Rikken and P. Wyder, “Magnetoelectric anisotropy in diffusive transport,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 016601 (2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field,

    Peter Fulde and Richard A. Ferrell, “Superconductivity in a strong spin-exchange field,” Phys. Rev.135, A550–A563 (1964)

    1964

  6. [6]

    Nonuniform state of su- perconductors,

    A. I. Larkin and Y . N. Ovchinnikov, “Nonuniform state of su- perconductors,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.47, 1136 (1964)

    1964

  7. [7]

    The superconducting diode effect,

    Muhammad Nadeem, Michael S. Fuhrer, and Xiaolin Wang, “The superconducting diode effect,” Nature Reviews Physics5, 558–577 (2023)

    2023

  8. [8]

    Superconducting diode effects: Mechanisms, materials and applications,

    Jiajun Ma, Ruiya Zhan, and Xiao Lin, “Superconducting diode effects: Mechanisms, materials and applications,” Advanced Physics Research4, 2400180 (2025)

    2025

Show all 49 references
  1. [9]

    Theories of super- conducting diode effects,

    Daniel Shaffer and Alex Levchenko, “Theories of super- conducting diode effects,” (2025), arXiv:2510.25864 [cond- mat.supr-con]

    2025

  2. [10]

    Nonreciprocal current in noncentrosymmetric Rashba superconductors,

    Ryohei Wakatsuki and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal current in noncentrosymmetric Rashba superconductors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 026601 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    Nonreciprocal charge transport in two- dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors,

    Shintaro Hoshino, Ryohei Wakatsuki, Keita Hamamoto, and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal charge transport in two- dimensional noncentrosymmetric superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B98, 054510 (2018)

    2018

  4. [12]

    Photogal- vanic phenomena in superconductors supporting intrinsic diode effect,

    S. V . Mironov, A. S. Mel’nikov, and A. I. Buzdin, “Photogal- vanic phenomena in superconductors supporting intrinsic diode effect,” Phys. Rev. B109, L220503 (2024)

    2024

  5. [13]

    Rectification and nonlinear Hall effect by fluctuating finite-momentum Cooper pairs,

    Akito Daido and Youichi Yanase, “Rectification and nonlinear Hall effect by fluctuating finite-momentum Cooper pairs,” Phys. Rev. Res.6, L022009 (2024)

    2024

  6. [14]

    Magnetochiral anisotropy in strained super- conducting transition metal dichalcogenides,

    Joaquim Telles de Miranda, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Magnetochiral anisotropy in strained super- conducting transition metal dichalcogenides,” (2026), arXiv:2606.05302 [cond-mat.supr-con]

    2026 arXiv

  7. [15]

    The Ginzburg - Landau equation for su- perconductors of polar symmetry,

    Victor M Edelstein, “The Ginzburg - Landau equation for su- perconductors of polar symmetry,” Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter8, 339 (1996)

    1996

  8. [16]

    Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases,

    D. F. Agterberg, “Magnetoelectric effects, helical phases, and FFLO phases,” inNon-centrosymmetric Superconductors, Lec- ture Notes in Physics, V ol. 847, edited by E. Bauer and M. Sigrist (Springer, 2012) Chap. 5, pp. 155–170. 6

    2012

  9. [17]

    Helical vortex phase in the noncentrosymmetric CePt3Si,

    R. P. Kaur, D. F. Agterberg, and M. Sigrist, “Helical vortex phase in the noncentrosymmetric CePt3Si,” Phys. Rev. Lett.94, 137002 (2005)

    2005

  10. [18]

    Magne- tostatics of superconductors without an inversion center,

    L. S. Levitov, Yu. v. Nazarov, and G. M. Eliashberg, “Magne- tostatics of superconductors without an inversion center,” Sov. Phys. JETP Lett.41, 445 (1985)

    1985

  11. [19]

    Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors,

    Noah F. Q. Yuan and Liang Fu, “Supercurrent diode effect and finite-momentum superconductors,” Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences119, e2119548119 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in Rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder,

    S. Ili ´c and F. S. Bergeret, “Theory of the supercurrent diode effect in Rashba superconductors with arbitrary disorder,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 177001 (2022)

    2022

  13. [21]

    Intrinsic superconducting diode effect,

    Akito Daido, Yuhei Ikeda, and Youichi Yanase, “Intrinsic superconducting diode effect,” Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 037001 (2022)

    2022

  14. [22]

    A phe- nomenological theory of superconductor diodes,

    James Jun He, Yukio Tanaka, and Naoto Nagaosa, “A phe- nomenological theory of superconductor diodes,” New Journal of Physics24, 053014 (2022)

    2022

  15. [23]

    Supercurrent diode effect in helical superconduc- tors,

    Jaglul Hasan, Daniel Shaffer, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Supercurrent diode effect in helical superconduc- tors,” Phys. Rev. B110, 024508 (2024)

    2024

  16. [24]

    Nonreciprocal re- sponses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials,

    Yoshinori Tokura and Naoto Nagaosa, “Nonreciprocal re- sponses from non-centrosymmetric quantum materials,” Nature Communications9, 3740 (2018)

    2018

  17. [25]

    Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,

    Naoto Nagaosa and Youichi Yanase, “Nonreciprocal transport and optical phenomena in quantum materials,” Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics15, 63–83 (2024)

    2024

  18. [26]

    A. I. Larkin and A. Varlamov,Theory of Fluctuations in Super- conductors(OUP Oxford, 2005)

    2005

  19. [27]

    The influence of fluctua- tion pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal,

    L.G. Aslamasov and A.I. Larkin, “The influence of fluctua- tion pairing of electrons on the conductivity of normal metal,” Physics Letters A26, 238–239 (1968)

    1968

  20. [28]

    The critical fluctuation of the order parameter in type-II superconductors,

    Kazumi Maki, “The critical fluctuation of the order parameter in type-II superconductors,” Progress of Theoretical Physics39, 897–906 (1968)

    1968

  21. [29]

    Microwave, flux flow, and fluctuation resistance of dirty type-II superconductors,

    Richard S. Thompson, “Microwave, flux flow, and fluctuation resistance of dirty type-II superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B1, 327–333 (1970)

    1970

  22. [30]

    Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-layer NbSe2,

    Lorenz Bauriedl, Christian B ¨auml, Lorenz Fuchs, Christian Baumgartner, Nicolas Paulik, Jonas M. Bauer, Kai-Qiang Lin, John M. Lupton, Takashi Taniguchi, Kenji Watanabe, Christoph Strunk, and Nicola Paradiso, “Supercurrent diode effect and magnetochiral anisotropy in few-laye...

    2022

  23. [31]

    Dual-mode superconducting diode effect en- abled by in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic field,

    Huai Guan, Chengyu Yan, Zhenyu Zhang, Yiheng Sun, Qiao Chen, Xinming Zhao, Chuanwen Zhao, Bo Gao, James Jun He, and Shun Wang, “Dual-mode superconducting diode effect en- abled by in-plane and out-of-plane magnetic field,” Communi- cations Physics9, 180 (2026)

    2026

  24. [32]

    Generalization of the Ginzburg–Landau equations for non-stationary problems in the case of alloys with paramagnetic impurities,

    L. P. Gor’kov and G. M. Eliashberg, “Generalization of the Ginzburg–Landau equations for non-stationary problems in the case of alloys with paramagnetic impurities,” Sov. Phys. - JETP 27, 328 (1968)

    1968

  25. [33]

    Diamagnetic susceptibility at the transition to the superconducting state,

    Albert Schmid, “Diamagnetic susceptibility at the transition to the superconducting state,” Phys. Rev.180, 527–529 (1969)

    1969

  26. [34]

    Linear and nonlinear conductivity of a super- conductor nearT c,

    Alan T. Dorsey, “Linear and nonlinear conductivity of a super- conductor nearT c,” Phys. Rev. B43, 7575–7585 (1991)

    1991

  27. [35]

    Keldysh Ginzburg- Landau action of fluctuating superconductors,

    Alex Levchenko and Alex Kamenev, “Keldysh Ginzburg- Landau action of fluctuating superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B76, 094518 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Keldysh technique and non-linearσ-model: basic principles and applications,

    Alex Kamenev and Alex Levchenko, “Keldysh technique and non-linearσ-model: basic principles and applications,” Ad- vances in Physics58, 197 (2009)

    2009

  29. [37]

    Helical phases in supercon- ductirs,

    V . P. Mineev and K. V . Samokhin, “Helical phases in supercon- ductirs,” Sov. Phys. - JETP78, 401 (1994)

    1994

  30. [38]

    Nonuniform states in non- centrosymmetric superconductors: Derivation of Lifshitz in- variants from microscopic theory,

    V . P. Mineev and K. V . Samokhin, “Nonuniform states in non- centrosymmetric superconductors: Derivation of Lifshitz in- variants from microscopic theory,” Phys. Rev. B78, 144503 (2008)

    2008

  31. [39]

    Quasiclassical theory of disordered Rashba superconductors,

    Manuel Houzet and Julia S. Meyer, “Quasiclassical theory of disordered Rashba superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B92, 014509 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Superconducting diode efficiency from singlet- triplet mixing in disordered systems,

    Jaglul Hasan, Daniel Shaffer, Maxim Khodas, and Alex Levchenko, “Superconducting diode efficiency from singlet- triplet mixing in disordered systems,” Phys. Rev. B111, 174514 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Gauge invariance and transport properties in superconductors aboveT c,

    A. G. Aronov, S. Hikami, and A. I. Larkin, “Gauge invariance and transport properties in superconductors aboveT c,” Phys. Rev. B51, 3880–3885 (1995)

    1995

  34. [42]

    Gate-induced su- perconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator,

    Ebrahim Sajadi, Tauno Palomaki, Zaiyao Fei, Wenjin Zhao, Philip Bement, Christian Olsen, Silvia Luescher, Xiaodong Xu, Joshua A. Folk, and David H. Cobden, “Gate-induced su- perconductivity in a monolayer topological insulator,” Science 362, 922–925 (2018)

    2018

  35. [43]

    Electrically tunable low- density superconductivity in a monolayer topological insula- tor,

    Valla Fatemi, Sanfeng Wu, Yuan Cao, Landry Bretheau, Quinn D. Gibson, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Robert J. Cava, and Pablo Jarillo-Herrero, “Electrically tunable low- density superconductivity in a monolayer topological insula- tor,” Science362, 926–929 (2018)

    2018

  36. [44]

    Superconductivity emerging from a sup- pressed large magnetoresistant state in tungsten ditelluride,

    Defen Kang, Yazhou Zhou, Wei Yi, Chongli Yang, Jing Guo, Youguo Shi, Shan Zhang, Zhe Wang, Chao Zhang, Sheng Jiang, Aiguo Li, Ke Yang, Qi Wu, Guangming Zhang, Liling Sun, and Zhongxian Zhao, “Superconductivity emerging from a sup- pressed large magnetoresistant state in tungst...

    2015

  37. [45]

    Superconductivity in Weyl semimetal candidate MoTe2,

    Yanpeng Qi, Pavel G. Naumov, Mazhar N. Ali, Cather- ine R. Rajamathi, Walter Schnelle, Oleg Barkalov, Michael Hanfland, Shu-Chun Wu, Chandra Shekhar, Yan Sun, Vicky S¨uß, Marcus Schmidt, Ulrich Schwarz, Eckhard Pippel, Pe- ter Werner, Reinald Hillebrand, Tobias F ¨orster, Erik...

    2016

  38. [46]

    Superconductivity in twisted bi- layer WSe2,

    Yiyu Xia, Zhongdong Han, Kenji Watanabe, Takashi Taniguchi, Jie Shan, and Kin Fai Mak, “Superconductivity in twisted bi- layer WSe2,” Nature637, 833–838 (2025)

    2025

  39. [47]

    Photogalvanic transport in fluctuating Ising superconductors,

    A. V . Parafilo, M. V . Boev, V . M. Kovalev, and I. G. Savenko, “Photogalvanic transport in fluctuating Ising superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B106, 144502 (2022)

    2022

  40. [48]

    Enhanced nonlin- ear Hall effect by Cooper pairs near the superconducting phase transition,

    Zi-Hao Dong, Hui Yang, and Yi Zhang, “Enhanced nonlin- ear Hall effect by Cooper pairs near the superconducting phase transition,” Phys. Rev. B111, 155120 (2025)

    2025

  41. [49]

    Re- ciprocal and nonreciprocal paraconductivity in bilayer multi- phase superconductors,

    Tsugumi Matsumoto, Youichi Yanase, and Akito Daido, “Re- ciprocal and nonreciprocal paraconductivity in bilayer multi- phase superconductors,” Phys. Rev. B111, 064501 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.