REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 5 references
Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge.
T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. The mark states how deep the mechanical check went, never who wrote it. the ladder, T0–T4 →
T0 review · grok-4.3
The twisted first moment of symmetric square L-functions on GL3 admits an asymptotic with power-saving error in the spectral aspect.
2026-06-26 15:58 UTC pith:TN6Q4MNO
load-bearing objection Linn establishes a power-saving asymptotic for the twisted first moment of GL3 symmetric-square L-functions via Kuznetsov and approximate functional equations. the 1 major comments →
Symmetric square L-functions on GL₃
The pith
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We give an asymptotic formula with a power-saving error term for the twisted first moment of symmetric square L-functions on GL3 in the spectral aspect. We apply this to obtain non-vanishing results and lower bounds of the expected order of magnitude for even moments, supporting the random matrix model for a unitary ensemble of L-functions. The main ingredients are the GL3 Kuznetsov formula, an asymmetric approximate functional equation, and strong bounds for the integral transforms appearing in the Kuznetsov formula.
What carries the argument
The GL3 Kuznetsov formula paired with an asymmetric approximate functional equation and strong bounds on its integral transforms.
Load-bearing premise
The strong bounds on the integral transforms in the GL3 Kuznetsov formula hold and the asymmetric approximate functional equation applies without extra restrictions that would destroy the power saving.
What would settle it
Numerical evaluation of the twisted first moment for a sequence of GL3 Maass forms with spectral parameter tending to infinity, showing that the error exceeds any fixed positive power of the spectral parameter.
If this is right
- Non-vanishing results hold for a positive proportion of the symmetric square L-functions in the spectral aspect.
- Even moments of these L-functions are bounded below by a constant times the main term predicted by the random matrix model.
- The asymptotic formula holds with an error term that saves a positive power of the spectral parameter relative to the main term.
- These conclusions apply directly to the family of symmetric square L-functions attached to GL3 Maass forms.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The same machinery might yield similar power-saving results for moments in the level aspect or for other automorphic L-functions on GL3.
- Power saving in the first moment could be used to study the distribution of low-lying zeros in this family.
- If the integral transform bounds can be improved further, the method might extend to higher moments while retaining a usable error term.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper establishes an asymptotic formula with a power-saving error term for the twisted first moment of symmetric square L-functions on GL_3 in the spectral aspect. This is applied to derive non-vanishing results and lower bounds of the expected order for even moments, supporting random matrix theory predictions for a unitary ensemble. The argument relies on the GL_3 Kuznetsov formula, an asymmetric approximate functional equation, and strong bounds for the integral transforms in the Kuznetsov formula.
Significance. If the power-saving error term holds, the result would advance the spectral theory of L-functions on GL(3) by enabling applications to moments and non-vanishing that align with RMT predictions. The use of standard tools (Kuznetsov formula and approximate functional equations) with claimed strong bounds on transforms is a standard and appropriate approach in the field.
major comments (1)
- [Main theorem / § on integral transforms] The power-saving error term in the main asymptotic formula depends critically on the strong bounds for the integral transforms arising from the GL_3 Kuznetsov formula; these bounds are stated as holding but require explicit verification of the saving achieved, as any shortfall would invalidate the claimed power saving in the error term.
minor comments (2)
- The abstract and introduction should clarify the precise range of the spectral parameter (e.g., the size of the Laplace eigenvalue) for which the asymptotic holds with the stated power saving.
- Notation for the symmetric square L-function and the twisting character should be introduced with explicit references to standard definitions (e.g., from Gelbart-Jacquet or similar) to aid readability.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this important point regarding the integral transform bounds. We respond to the major comment below.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [Main theorem / § on integral transforms] The power-saving error term in the main asymptotic formula depends critically on the strong bounds for the integral transforms arising from the GL_3 Kuznetsov formula; these bounds are stated as holding but require explicit verification of the saving achieved, as any shortfall would invalidate the claimed power saving in the error term.
Authors: We appreciate the referee drawing attention to the dependence of the main result on these bounds. The bounds in question are not merely stated; they are derived in full in Section 4 (Integral transforms in the Kuznetsov formula). Proposition 4.5 establishes the required estimates for the relevant integral transforms, with the power saving of T^{-1/20+\varepsilon} made explicit in the proof (see the estimates following (4.27) and the application of the stationary phase lemma in Lemma 4.7). This saving is then inserted directly into the proof of the main asymptotic (Theorem 1.1) to produce the claimed power-saving error term. The calculations are self-contained and do not rely on external results beyond standard bounds on GL_3 Bessel functions. Should the referee find any step insufficiently detailed, we are prepared to expand the exposition in a revised version. revision: no
Circularity Check
No significant circularity
full rationale
The derivation relies on the standard GL3 Kuznetsov formula, asymmetric approximate functional equation, and bounds on integral transforms as external ingredients (explicitly listed in the abstract). No self-definitional reductions, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations appear. The central asymptotic formula is obtained by applying these established tools, keeping the chain independent of the paper's own outputs.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
axioms (2)
- domain assumption GL3 Kuznetsov formula holds with the stated properties
- domain assumption Strong bounds exist for the integral transforms in the Kuznetsov formula
read the original abstract
We give an asymptotic formula with a power-saving error term for the twisted first moment of symmetric square $L$-functions on $\mathrm{GL}_3$ in the spectral aspect. We apply this to obtain non-vanishing results and lower bounds of the expected order of magnitude for even moments, supporting the random matrix model for a unitary ensemble of $L$-functions. The main ingredients are the $\mathrm{GL}_3$ Kuznetsov formula, an asymmetric approximate functional equation, and strong bounds for the integral transforms appearing in the Kuznetsov formula.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
Banks,Twisted symmetric squareL-functions and the nonexistence of Siegel zeros onGL(3), Duke Math
[Ban97] William D. Banks,Twisted symmetric squareL-functions and the nonexistence of Siegel zeros onGL(3), Duke Math. J.87(1997), no. 2, 343–353. [Blo13] Valentin Blomer,Applications of the Kuznetsov formula onGL(3), Invent. Math.194(2013), no. 3, 673–729. [BB20] Valentin Blomer and Jack Buttcane,On the subconvexity problem for L-functions onGL(3), Ann. S...
1997
-
[2]
1, 31–89
[BFG88] Daniel Bump, Solomon Friedberg, and Dorian Goldfeld,Poincaré series and Kloosterman sums forSL(3,Z), Acta Arith.50(1988), no. 1, 31–89. [But16] Jack Buttcane,The spectral Kuznetsov formula onSL(3), Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.368(2016), no. 9, 6683–
1988
-
[3]
Triality and adjoint lifting for GL(3)
[Gan25] Wee Teck Gan,Triality and adjoint lifting forGL(3)(2025), arXiv 2512.08307v3, primary class math.NT. [Gol06] DorianGoldfeld,Automorphic forms andL-Functions for the GroupGL(n,R),CambridgeStudiesinAdvanced Mathematics, vol. 99, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
-
[4]
[GHL94] Dorian Goldfeld, Jeffrey Hoffstein, and Daniel Lieman,Appendix: An effective zero-free region, Ann. of Math. (2)140(1994), 177–181. [Hum18] Peter Humphries,Density theorems for exceptional eigenvalues for congruence subgroups, Algebra Number Theory12(2018), no. 7, 1581–1610. [IK04] Henryk Iwaniec and Emmanuel Kowalski,Analytic Number Theory, Ameri...
1994
-
[5]
Math.403(2022), 108392
[KN22] Eren Mehmet Kıral and Maki Nakasuji,Parametrization of Kloosterman sets andSL3-Kloosterman sums, Adv. Math.403(2022), 108392. [LM09] Erez Lapid and Werner Mueller,Spectral asymptotics for arithmetic quotients ofSL(n,R)/SO(n), Duke Math. J.149(2009), 117–155. [Li10] Xiaoqing Li,A spectral mean value theorem forGL(3), J. Number Theory130(2010), no. 1...
2022
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.