pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20067 · v1 · pith:FY7D4FFLnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 🌌 astro-ph.IM · astro-ph.HE

VASTER: The ASKAP real-time fast-imaging pipeline -- overview and discovery of two long period transients

Yuanming Wang , Dougal Dobie , Tara Murphy , Emil Lenc , David L. Kaplan , Joshua Pritchard , Daniel Mitchell , Wasim Raja
show 17 more authors
Matthew Whiting Owen Cole Paul J. Hancock Jiting Hu Yu Wing Joshua Lee Alex Massen-Hane Shibli Saleheen Raymond Shao Lei Zhang Adarsh Bathula Manisha Caleb Raghav Girgaonkar Ashna Gulati Natasha Hurley-Walker Iris de Ruiter Ryan M. Shannon Gregory R. Sivakoff
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:47 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.IM astro-ph.HE
keywords ASKAPradio transientsreal-time pipelinelong period transientswidefield imagingtransient detectionfast imaging
0
0 comments X

The pith

VASTER is the first real-time short-timescale imaging and transient detection pipeline on a widefield radio telescope, discovering two long period transients.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces VASTER, a pipeline that images and searches for transients in widefield radio data while the observations are still underway rather than after the fact. Earlier work on similar sources relied on offline processing of archival data, which missed the chance for immediate follow-up. VASTER has operated on ASKAP since July 2025 and produces images on 15-minute timescales. In its first two weeks it found two new sources that repeat every 6.48 hours and 4.69 hours. A reader would care because the real-time approach opens a previously inaccessible window on transient behavior at short timescales.

Core claim

VASTER is the first short-timescale imaging and transient detection pipeline running in real time on a widefield radio telescope. It has been running on the Australian SKA Pathfinder since July 2025 and images most of the ASKAP survey project data on timescales of 15 minutes. In the first two weeks of operation it discovered ASKAP J165130.3-450520 with a period of 6.48 hours and ASKAP J170036.6-445758 with a period of 4.69 hours. The detection of these two sources adds to the small but growing population of long period transients and demonstrates the potential of VASTER to explore this region of transient parameter space.

What carries the argument

The VASTER real-time fast-imaging pipeline, which performs short-timescale transient detection on widefield radio telescope data.

If this is right

  • The detections add two new members to the small but growing population of long period transients.
  • Real-time processing on 15-minute timescales allows exploration of transient behavior that archival offline searches have overlooked.
  • The pipeline has operated successfully on ASKAP survey data since July 2025.
  • The approach shows that real-time imaging and detection are feasible for large volumes of widefield radio data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Real-time detection could enable prompt multi-wavelength follow-up while a transient is still active.
  • Continued operation of the pipeline is likely to increase the known sample of long period transients.
  • Similar real-time systems could be deployed on other widefield telescopes to expand the search for short-timescale transients.

Load-bearing premise

The two reported sources are genuine astrophysical transients rather than instrumental artifacts produced by calibration or imaging errors.

What would settle it

Independent observations of ASKAP J165130.3-450520 and ASKAP J170036.6-445758 that fail to recover the reported periodic radio signals at 6.48 and 4.69 hours would falsify the discoveries.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20067 by Adarsh Bathula, Alex Massen-Hane, Ashna Gulati, Daniel Mitchell, David L. Kaplan, Dougal Dobie, Emil Lenc, Gregory R. Sivakoff, Iris de Ruiter, Jiting Hu, Joshua Pritchard, Lei Zhang, Manisha Caleb, Matthew Whiting, Natasha Hurley-Walker, Owen Cole, Paul J. Hancock, Raghav Girgaonkar, Raymond Shao, Ryan M. Shannon, Shibli Saleheen, Tara Murphy, Wasim Raja, Yuanming Wang, Yu Wing Joshua Lee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Flowchart of the VASTER real-time system. An overview of the system is described in Section 2, with the ‘fast imaging’ described in Section 2.1 and the ‘transient detection’ described in Section 2.2. All processing is performed independently on individual beams. We list the typical processing time for each part for a typical 10 h observation. The inputs for the transient detection are the time-averaged dee… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Sky coverage of the observations used for the initial results (shown as red shaded regions). Markers represent detected transient and variable sources (see details in Section 4). The background is the diffuse Galactic radio emission at 943.5 MHz modelled by Zheng et al. (2017). zoom modes means that only a small fraction of the full band￾width is available. VASTER was initially operated on the First Large … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Light curves of all transients (excluding the two LPTs, which are shown separately) in their detected epoch. Source identifications are given in the bottom-left corner of each panel. The two unidentified sources are shown on the bottom row, and have no label. tory archivel to find any fainter counterparts not included in SIMBAD. ASKAP typically achieves sub-arcsec localisation accuracy for mJy-level source… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Optical images overlaid with the 1σ positional uncertainty regions of the radio sources requiring further multi-wavelength searches. For each panel, the source name, classification, optical/infrared survey, and observing band are shown at the top. The angular scale is shown in the lower right corner. The 1σ localisation region of the radio source is given by the white ellipse. The positional uncertainties … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Four detected pulses of ASKAP J165130.3−450520 aligned to its measured period. The observation start times are listed on the left of each detection. The light-curve time resolution is averaged to 1 min. derived from ASKAP imaging, and we fit only for the spin frequency [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Full-Stokes dynamic spectrum of ASKAP J165130.3−450520 in observation on 11 July 2025. The time resolution is averaged to 1 min, and the frequency resolution is averaged to 4 MHz. This observation used an experimental field-based calibration scheme to reduce calibration overheads involved when switching between bands and/or footprints, and therefore resulted in an excess of residual leakage from Stokes I t… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Six detected pulses of ASKAP J170036.6−445758 aligned to its measured period. The first five pulses were detected with ASKAP, and the last pulse was detected with MeerKAT. The observation start times are listed on the left of each detection. The light-curve time resolution is averaged to 15 min. 4.2 Unidentified sources Two transients lack multi-wavelength counterparts and remain of uncertain nature. We an… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Example of a transient candidate displayed in the VASTER web inspection tool. The summary panel (top left) provides observation metadata and candidate statistics. The time-averaged deep image (top centre), the short-timescale residual images (‘slices’, middle), and the intra-observation light curve (bottom right) are shown as a central column. The right panel provides the classification interface, where us… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Examples of transient detections in the time-averaged deep images and short-timescale residual images, plotted from the VASTER outputs, for two sources: the flaring star ASKAP J051629.6−313543 (top row) and the LPT ASKAP J165130.3−450520 (bottom row). From left to right in each row: the time-averaged deep image, the residual image prior to the flare, the residual image during the flare, and the residual i… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Examples of typical false candidates in the VASTER outputs. Each column corresponds to one candidate: the top row shows the time-averaged deep images, and the bottom row shows the representative residual images. The white circle marks the candidate source position, with a radius of 20 arcsec. In the residual images, these candidates appear as non–PSF-like artefacts, which is a key indicator used to identi… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Recent developments in widefield radio telescopes have enabled searches of a new region of parameter space in the time domain: timescales of seconds to minutes, that have been overlooked in traditional surveys. These searches have revealed a new population of sources: long period transients, which typically show periodic behaviour of minutes to hours. In addition they have detected phenomena ranging from extreme scintillation to stellar radio bursts. However, almost all searches to date have involved archival data that has been processed in offline, batch mode. In this context, we present VASTER, the first short-timescale imaging and transient detection pipeline running in real time on a widefield radio telescope. VASTER has been running on the Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP) since July 2025, and images most of the ASKAP survey project data on timescales of 15 minutes. In this paper we describe the VASTER system, and present the results from the first two weeks of operation, including the discovery of two long period transients: ASKAP~J165130.3$-$450520 with a period of 6.48 hours and ASKAP~J170036.6$-$445758 with a period of 4.69 hours. The detection of these two sources adds to the small, but growing, population of long period transients, as well as demonstrating the potential of VASTER to explore this region of transient parameter space.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents VASTER as the first real-time short-timescale (15-minute) imaging and transient detection pipeline operating on the ASKAP widefield radio telescope since July 2025. It describes the system architecture and reports the discovery of two long-period transients from the initial two weeks of operation: ASKAP J165130.3-450520 (period 6.48 hours) and ASKAP J170036.6-445758 (period 4.69 hours).

Significance. If the detections are confirmed as astrophysical, the work would demonstrate the feasibility of real-time processing for uncovering new transient populations on minute-to-hour timescales that have been inaccessible to offline surveys. The real-time aspect is a clear strength for enabling prompt multi-wavelength follow-up.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The presentation of the two detections supplies no quantitative information on residual image noise, false-positive rates from injected sources, or cross-checks against archival non-detections. This information is load-bearing for the central discovery claim, because the reported periods could arise from periodic systematics in calibration, RFI rejection, or detection thresholds rather than intrinsic source variability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on the manuscript. The single major comment is addressed point-by-point below. We will incorporate the requested quantitative information into the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The presentation of the two detections supplies no quantitative information on residual image noise, false-positive rates from injected sources, or cross-checks against archival non-detections. This information is load-bearing for the central discovery claim, because the reported periods could arise from periodic systematics in calibration, RFI rejection, or detection thresholds rather than intrinsic source variability.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract as currently written does not include the requested quantitative metrics, and that such information strengthens the discovery claims. The main text (Sections 3 and 4) already reports residual RMS noise levels in the 15-minute images and notes that the two sources are absent from prior ASKAP archival images at the same frequency and sensitivity; however, we did not include explicit false-positive rates from injection tests in the abstract. In the revised manuscript we will (i) add a concise statement to the abstract giving the typical residual noise, the false-positive rate measured from source-injection campaigns, and the archival non-detection result, and (ii) expand the methods and results sections with the corresponding tables and figures so that the quantitative validation is fully documented. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: observational pipeline report with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper describes the implementation and first results of the VASTER real-time imaging pipeline on ASKAP, including the detection of two transients with reported periods. No mathematical derivations, fitted parameters presented as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations are present. The central claims rest on the system's operation and the observational data collected, which are independent of any internal reduction to inputs by construction. This is a standard engineering/observational report with no derivation chain to analyze for circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is an observational instrumentation paper. No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are invoked in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5891 in / 927 out tokens · 17888 ms · 2026-06-26T15:47:35.681291+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C., & Ransom, S

    Andersen, B. C., & Ransom, S. M. 2018, ApJ, 863, L13 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sipőcz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123

    2018

  2. [2]

    J., Mason, P

    Barrett, P., Dieck, C., Beasley, A. J., Mason, P. A., & Singh, K. P. 2020, Advances in Space Research, 66, 1226

    2020

  3. [3]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828

    Caleb, M., Heywood, I., Rajwade, K., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 828

    2022

  4. [4]

    L., et al

    Caleb, M., Lenc, E., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1159 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501

    2024

  5. [5]

    M., & Lazio, T

    Cordes, J. M., & Lazio, T. J. W. 2002, arXiv e-prints, astro

    2002

  6. [6]

    N., et al

    Dai, S., Hobbs, G., Manchester, R. N., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 3223 de Ruiter, I., Meyers, Z. S., Rowlinson, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 4805 de Ruiter, I., Dobie, D., Murphy, T., et al. 2026, PASA, 43, e039

    2015

  7. [7]

    Dennett-Thorpe, J., & de Bruyn, A. G. 2002, Nature, 415, 57

    2002

  8. [8]

    M., McClure-Griffiths, N., Gibson, S

    Dickey, J. M., McClure-Griffiths, N., Gibson, S. J., et al. 2013, PASA, 30, e003

    2013

  9. [9]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 4684

    Dobie, D., Pritchard, J., Wang, Y., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 4684

    2023

  10. [10]

    S., et al

    Dobie, D., Zic, A., Oswald, L. S., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 909

    2024

  11. [11]

    A., Clarke, T

    Dong, F. A., Clarke, T. E., Curtin, A., et al. 2025, ApJ, 990, L49

    2025

  12. [12]

    N., Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., et al

    Driessen, L. N., Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e084

    2024

  13. [13]

    Dulk, G. A. 1985, ARA&A, 23, 169

    1985

  14. [14]

    Fijma, S., Rowlinson, A., Wijers, R. A. M. J., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 6985 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1

    2024

  15. [15]

    M., Brasseur, C

    Ginsburg, A., Sipőcz, B. M., Brasseur, C. E., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 98 phttps://github.com/IanHeywood/oxkat

    2019

  16. [16]

    2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1912.003, ascl:1912.003

    Guzman, J., Whiting, M., V oronkov, M., et al. 2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1912.003, ascl:1912.003

    2019

  17. [17]

    J., Murphy, T., Gaensler, B

    Hancock, P. J., Murphy, T., Gaensler, B. M., Hopkins, A., & Curran, J. R. 2012, MNRAS, 422, 1812

    2012

  18. [18]

    J., Trott, C

    Hancock, P. J., Trott, C. M., & Hurley-Walker, N. 2018, PASA, 35, e011

    2018

  19. [19]

    H., Kern, J

    Hankins, T. H., Kern, J. S., Weatherall, J. C., & Eilek, J. A. 2003, Nature, 422, 141

    2003

  20. [20]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  21. [21]

    2020, oxkat: Semi-automated imaging of MeerKA T observations, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2009.003, ascl:2009.003

    Heywood, I. 2020, oxkat: Semi-automated imaging of MeerKA T observations, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2009.003, ascl:2009.003

    2020

  22. [22]

    N., Dunning, A., et al

    Hobbs, G., Manchester, R. N., Dunning, A., et al. 2020, PASA, 37, e012

    2020

  23. [23]

    B., Edwards, R

    Hobbs, G. B., Edwards, R. T., & Manchester, R. N. 2006, MNRAS, 369, 655 Horváth, C., Hurley-Walker, N., McSweeney, S., Galvin, T. J., & Morgan, J. 2025, PASA, 42, e129

    2006

  24. [24]

    W., Bunton, J

    Hotan, A. W., Bunton, J. D., Chippendale, A. P., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e009

    2021

  25. [25]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  26. [26]

    2022, Nature, 601, 526

    Hurley-Walker, N., Zhang, X., Bahramian, A., et al. 2022, Nature, 601, 526

    2022

  27. [27]

    J., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., Rea, N., McSweeney, S. J., et al. 2023, Nature, 619, 487

    2023

  28. [28]

    J., Bahramian, A., et al

    Hurley-Walker, N., McSweeney, S. J., Bahramian, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, L21

    2024

  29. [29]

    2007, PASA, 24, 174

    Johnston, S., Bailes, M., Bartel, N., et al. 2007, PASA, 24, 174

    2007

  30. [30]

    M., Hallinan, G., Pineda, J

    Kao, M. M., Hallinan, G., Pineda, J. S., et al. 2016, ApJ, 818, 24

    2016

  31. [31]

    I., & Pauliny-Toth, I

    Kellermann, K. I., & Pauliny-Toth, I. I. K. 1969, ApJ, 155, L71

    1969

  32. [32]

    S., Staveley-Smith, L., Westmeier, T., et al

    Koribalski, B. S., Staveley-Smith, L., Westmeier, T., et al. 2020, Ap&SS, 365, 118

    2020

  33. [33]

    G., O’Brien, J

    Kramer, M., Lyne, A. G., O’Brien, J. T., Jordan, C. A., & Lorimer, D. R. 2006, Science, 312, 549

    2006

  34. [34]

    Lazio, T. J. W., Clarke, T. E., Lane, W. M., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1995

    2010

  35. [35]

    Lee, Y. W. J., Caleb, M., Murphy, T., et al. 2025, Nature Astronomy, 9, 393

    2025

  36. [36]

    Lee, Y. W. J., Wang, Y., Caleb, M., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 545, staf2008

    2026

  37. [37]

    R., Kaplan, D

    Lenc, E., Murphy, T., Lynch, C. R., Kaplan, D. L., & Zhang, S. N. 2018, MNRAS, 478, 2835

    2018

  38. [38]

    R., & Kramer, M

    Lorimer, D. R., & Kramer, M. 2004, Handbook of Pulsar Astronomy, V ol. 4

    2004

  39. [39]

    Macquart, J.-P., Bailes, M., Bhat, N. D. R., et al. 2010, PASA, 27, 272

    2010

  40. [40]

    N., Hobbs, G

    Manchester, R. N., Hobbs, G. B., Teoh, A., & Hobbs, M. 2005, AJ, 129, 1993

    2005

  41. [41]

    L., Lenc, E., et al

    McConnell, D., Hale, C. L., Lenc, E., et al. 2020, PASA, 37, e048

    2020

  42. [42]

    G., Banerji, M., Gonzalez, E., et al

    McMahon, R. G., Banerji, M., Gonzalez, E., et al. 2013, The Messenger, 154, 35

    2013

  43. [43]

    W., Emerson, J

    Minniti, D., Lucas, P. W., Emerson, J. P., et al. 2010, New A, 15, 433

    2010

  44. [44]

    Murphy, T., & Kaplan, D. L. 2026, PASA, 43, e006

    2026

  45. [45]

    L., et al

    Murphy, T., Chatterjee, S., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2013, PASA, 30, e006

    2013

  46. [46]

    L., Stewart, A

    Murphy, T., Kaplan, D. L., Stewart, A. J., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e054

    2021

  47. [47]

    1992, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 341, 151

    Narayan, R. 1992, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A, 341, 151

    1992

  48. [48]

    J., Bailes, M., et al

    Ng, C., Champion, D. J., Bailes, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 450, 2922

    2015

  49. [49]

    P., Hopkins, A

    Norris, R. P., Hopkins, A. M., Afonso, J., et al. 2011, PASA, 28, 215

    2011

  50. [50]

    P., Marvil, J., Collier, J

    Norris, R. P., Marvil, J., Collier, J. D., et al. 2021, PASA, 38, e046

    2021

  51. [51]

    S., Taylor, G

    Obenberger, K. S., Taylor, G. B., Hartman, J. M., et al. 2015, Journal of Astronomical Instrumentation, 4, 1550004

    2015

  52. [52]

    1996, The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues, doi:10

    Ochsenbein, F. 1996, The VizieR database of astronomical catalogues, doi:10. 26093/CDS/VIZIER

    1996

  53. [53]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 23

    Ochsenbein, F., Bauer, P., & Marcout, J. 2000, A&AS, 143, 23

    2000

  54. [54]

    R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al

    Offringa, A. R., McKinley, B., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 444, 606

    2014

  55. [55]

    2026, PASA, 43, e007

    Petrou, F., Wang, Y., Hurley-Walker, N., et al. 2026, PASA, 43, e007

    2026

  56. [56]

    2022, in As- tronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Pintaldi, S., Stewart, A., O’Brien, A., Kaplan, D., & Murphy, T. 2022, in As- tronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 532, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXX, ed. J. E. Ruiz, F. Pierfedereci, & P. Teuben, 333

    2022

  57. [57]

    Price, D. C. 2016, PyGDSM: Python interface to Global Diffuse Sky Models, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1603.013, ascl:1603.013

    2016

  58. [58]

    askap-vast/dstools: v2.0.0 (2025)

    Pritchard, J. 2025, askap-vast/dstools: v2.0.0, doi:10.5281/zenodo.15232974 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia15

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.15232974 2025

  59. [59]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 5438

    Pritchard, J., Murphy, T., Zic, A., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 5438

    2021

  60. [60]

    M., Eikenberry, S

    Ransom, S. M., Eikenberry, S. S., & Middleditch, J. 2002, AJ, 124, 1788

    2002

  61. [61]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 4646

    Rhee, J., Meyer, M., Popping, A., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 4646

    2023

  62. [62]

    P., et al

    Rigney, J., Ramsay, G., Carley, E. P., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 540

    2022

  63. [63]

    2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1208.017, ascl:1208.017

    Robitaille, T., & Bressert, E. 2012, APLpy: Astronomical Plotting Library in Python, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1208.017, ascl:1208.017

    2012

  64. [64]

    J., et al

    Ross, K., Hurley-Walker, N., Galvin, T. J., et al. 2024, PASA, 41, e054

    2024

  65. [65]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103

    2011

  66. [66]

    2024, MNRAS, 535, 2812

    Semenko, E., Kochukhov, O., Mikulášek, Z., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 535, 2812

    2024

  67. [67]

    M., Bannister, K

    Shannon, R. M., Bannister, K. W., Bera, A., et al. 2025, PASA, 42, e036

    2025

  68. [68]

    M., Golden, A., Myburgh, T., et al

    Smirnov, O. M., Golden, A., Myburgh, T., et al. 2025b, MNRAS, 538, L89 Van Eck, C. L., R. Purcell, C., Baidoo, L., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 28

    2026

  69. [69]

    K., Callingham, J

    Vedantham, H. K., Callingham, J. R., Shimwell, T. W., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, L33

    2020

  70. [70]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Medicine, 17, 261 V oronkov, M. 2020, in European Physical Journal Web of Conferences, V ol. 245, European Physical Journal Web of Conferences (EDP), 01038

    2020

  71. [71]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 3294

    Wang, Y., Tuntsov, A., Murphy, T., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 3294

    2021

  72. [72]

    L., et al

    Wang, Y., Murphy, T., Kaplan, D. L., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 38

    2022

  73. [73]

    2023, MNRAS, 523, 5661

    Wang, Y., Murphy, T., Lenc, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 5661

    2023

  74. [74]

    W., Panagia, N., Montes, M

    Weiler, K. W., Panagia, N., Montes, M. J., & Sramek, R. A. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 387

    2002

  75. [75]

    2000, A&AS, 143, 9

    Wenger, M., Ochsenbein, F., Egret, D., et al. 2000, A&AS, 143, 9

    2000

  76. [76]

    M., & Franciosini, E

    White, S. M., & Franciosini, E. 1995, ApJ, 444, 342

    1995

  77. [77]

    2012, PASA, 29, 371

    Whiting, M., & Humphreys, B. 2012, PASA, 29, 371

    2012

  78. [78]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868

    2010

  79. [79]

    M., Manchester, R

    Yao, J. M., Manchester, R. N., & Wang, N. 2017, ApJ, 835, 29 Y oon, H., Sadler, E. M., Mahony, E. K., et al. 2025, PASA, 42, e088

    2017

  80. [80]

    N., et al

    Zhang, L., Hobbs, G., Manchester, R. N., et al. 2019, ApJ, 885, L37

    2019

Showing first 80 references.