pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20279 · v1 · pith:4NVA7VFInew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Spin transport in a normal meta-altermagnetic superconducting nanowire junction

Xing-Jian Yi , Yi-Xin Dai , Yue Mao , Qing-Feng Sun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords spin transportaltermagnetsuperconducting nanowireAndreev reflectionspin triplet Cooper pairsnonequilibrium Green's functiondissipationless spin transport
0
0 comments X

The pith

A normal metal-altermagnetic superconducting nanowire junction exhibits nonzero equal-spin Andreev reflection, verifying injection of spin triplet Cooper pairs.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes that a one-dimensional nanowire placed on an s-wave superconductor and in proximity to an altermagnet forms an altermagnetic superconducting nanowire that supports spin triplet superconductivity. Using the nonequilibrium Green's function method, the authors calculate a nonzero equal spin Andreev reflection coefficient at the normal metal interface, which directly indicates the presence of spin triplet Cooper pairs. They further show that spin transport under applied spin bias can be controlled through adjustments to the chemical potential and the orientation of the spin bias. This configuration is presented as a route to dissipationless spin currents carried by triplet pairs.

Core claim

In the normal metal-altermagnetic superconducting nanowire junction, a nonzero equal spin Andreev reflection coefficient appears at the interface, confirming the injection of spin triplet Cooper pairs into the system. Spin transport properties under spin bias are tunable by chemical potential and spin bias orientation, establishing a pathway to dissipationless spin transport.

What carries the argument

The equal spin Andreev reflection coefficient at the normal metal-altermagnetic superconducting nanowire interface, which serves as the signature for spin triplet Cooper pair injection.

If this is right

  • Spin triplet superconductivity and associated spin supercurrent become realizable in the altermagnetic superconducting nanowire geometry.
  • Spin transport can be systematically tuned by varying the chemical potential and the direction of the applied spin bias.
  • The hybrid junction supplies a concrete platform for dissipationless spin transport based on triplet Cooper pairs.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The tunability by chemical potential suggests that gate voltages could switch spin current on or off in a device setting.
  • Similar proximity-induced triplet pairing might be tested by replacing the altermagnet with other magnetic materials that break time-reversal symmetry in a comparable way.
  • The nonzero Andreev coefficient implies that spin-polarized currents could be injected from normal metals into the nanowire without requiring ferromagnetic contacts.

Load-bearing premise

The model assumes that proximity to the altermagnet combined with the s-wave superconductor induces the spin-triplet pairing symmetry required for the reported Andreev reflection process.

What would settle it

Direct measurement showing a zero equal spin Andreev reflection coefficient at the normal metal-altermagnetic superconducting nanowire interface under the modeled conditions would falsify the spin triplet Cooper pair injection claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20279 by Qing-Feng Sun, Xing-Jian Yi, Yi-Xin Dai, Yue Mao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic for normal metal-altermagnetic supercon [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) The energy band of 1D superconducting nanowire. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Equal-spin Andreev reflection coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Spin conductance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Equal-spin Andreev reflection coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Equal-spin Andreev reflection coefficient [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Spin conductance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. (a-c) Band inversion process with the chemical po [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Spin triplet superconductors are considered a promising platform for dissipationless spin transport, where spin currents are carried by spin triplet Cooper pairs. In this paper, we propose that the spin triplet superconductivity and spin supercurrent can be engineered in an altermagnetic superconducting nanowire, where a one-dimensional nanowire is placed on the surface of an s-wave superconductor and in proximity to the altermagnet. Using the nonequilibrium Green's function method, we demonstrate a nonzero equal spin Andreev reflection coefficient at the normal metal-altermagnetic superconducting nanowire interface, thereby verifying the injection of spin triplet Cooper pairs. Furthermore, we systematically investigate the spin transport properties in this hybrid system under a spin bias. Our results demonstrate that these properties can be effectively tuned by the chemical potential and spin bias orientation. Our proposal provides a pathway toward realizing dissipationless spin transport.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes engineering spin-triplet superconductivity in a one-dimensional nanowire placed in proximity to both an s-wave superconductor and an altermagnet, forming an altermagnetic superconducting nanowire (ASNW). Using the nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) method, the authors calculate transport across the normal metal-ASNW interface and report a nonzero equal-spin Andreev reflection coefficient, interpreted as direct verification of spin-triplet Cooper pair injection. They further compute spin currents under applied spin bias and demonstrate tunability via chemical potential and bias orientation.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would provide a concrete materials platform for dissipationless spin transport mediated by engineered triplet pairs, of interest to superconducting spintronics. The NEGF treatment is a standard and appropriate tool for the nonequilibrium calculation; the specific use of altermagnetic order to induce the triplet component is the novel element. No machine-checked proofs, open reproducible code, or parameter-free analytic derivations are presented.

major comments (2)
  1. [Model Hamiltonian section (likely §2)] Model Hamiltonian section (likely §2): The claim that altermagnetic proximity induces spin-triplet pairing from the input s-wave singlet is load-bearing for the verification step. The manuscript must explicitly extract and display the anomalous Green's function components (e.g., the equal-spin triplet amplitudes f↑↑ and f↓↓) and demonstrate that these amplitudes are generated by the momentum-dependent altermagnetic term J(k)·σ rather than inserted by hand.
  2. [Andreev reflection results (likely §3–4)] Andreev reflection results (likely §3–4): The reported nonzero equal-spin AR coefficient is presented as verification of triplet injection. A control calculation with the altermagnetic strength set to zero must be shown; if equal-spin AR vanishes in that limit, the causal link is secured. Without it, alternative mechanisms cannot be ruled out.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and title: 'meta-altermagnetic' appears in the title but the body consistently uses 'altermagnetic'; adopt uniform terminology.
  2. [Throughout] Notation: Define the spin-bias orientation angle and the chemical-potential window more explicitly in the figure captions and text to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications and controls.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Model Hamiltonian section (likely §2): The claim that altermagnetic proximity induces spin-triplet pairing from the input s-wave singlet is load-bearing for the verification step. The manuscript must explicitly extract and display the anomalous Green's function components (e.g., the equal-spin triplet amplitudes f↑↑ and f↓↓) and demonstrate that these amplitudes are generated by the momentum-dependent altermagnetic term J(k)·σ rather than inserted by hand.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit extraction of the anomalous Green's function components would strengthen the presentation. In the revised manuscript we will compute and display the equal-spin triplet amplitudes f↑↑ and f↓↓, and we will demonstrate their generation by the J(k)·σ term through a direct decomposition of the self-energy and by showing that these amplitudes vanish when the altermagnetic term is removed from the Hamiltonian. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Andreev reflection results (likely §3–4): The reported nonzero equal-spin AR coefficient is presented as verification of triplet injection. A control calculation with the altermagnetic strength set to zero must be shown; if equal-spin AR vanishes in that limit, the causal link is secured. Without it, alternative mechanisms cannot be ruled out.

    Authors: We agree that the control calculation is required to establish the causal role of the altermagnetic order. In the revised manuscript we will include the equal-spin Andreev reflection spectra obtained with the altermagnetic strength J set identically to zero; these spectra will show that the equal-spin AR coefficient vanishes, thereby confirming that the nonzero value reported in the original calculation originates from the altermagnetic proximity effect. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained NEGF output

full rationale

The paper constructs an explicit model Hamiltonian for the altermagnetic superconducting nanowire (s-wave pairing term plus altermagnetic spin-splitting term) and applies the standard nonequilibrium Green's function formalism to compute Andreev reflection coefficients. The reported nonzero equal-spin AR coefficient is obtained by direct solution of the resulting equations rather than by fitting, redefinition, or reduction to a self-citation. No load-bearing step equates the output to an input by construction, and the central verification follows from the Green's function structure without smuggling an ansatz or uniqueness theorem. This is the normal case of a calculation whose internal consistency is independent of the target claim.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the applicability of the nonequilibrium Green's function formalism to the hybrid junction and on the assumption that proximity effects produce the required triplet pairing; no free parameters are fitted to data in the abstract.

free parameters (2)
  • chemical potential
    Tuning parameter used to control spin transport properties
  • spin bias orientation
    Tuning parameter used to control spin transport properties
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Nonequilibrium Green's function method is valid for calculating Andreev reflection in this normal-metal to altermagnetic-superconducting nanowire junction
    Method invoked to obtain the nonzero equal-spin reflection coefficient

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5676 in / 1288 out tokens · 39626 ms · 2026-06-26T15:10:00.146080+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sinova and I

    J. Sinova and I. ˇZuti´ c, New moves of the spintronics tango, Nat. Mater.11, 368 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    ˇZuti´ c, J

    I. ˇZuti´ c, J. Fabian, and S. Das Sarma, Spintronics: Fun- damentals and applications, Rev. Mod. Phys.76, 323 (2004)

    2004

  3. [3]

    S. A. Wolf, D. D. Awschalom, R. A. Buhrman, J. M. Daughton, S. von Moln´ ar, M. L. Roukes, A. Y. Chtchelkanova, and D. M. Treger, Spintronics: A spin- based electronics vision for the future, Science294, 1488 (2001)

    2001

  4. [4]

    Cao, S.-Y

    P. Cao, S.-Y. Xie, X.-B. Li, and Y. Jiang, Pure out-of- plane spin polarization induced by rashba-type splitting, Nano Lett.25, 10287 (2025)

    2025

  5. [5]

    Liu, C.-F

    L. Liu, C.-F. Pai, Y. Li, H. W. Tseng, D. C. Ralph, and R. A. Buhrman, Spin-torque switching with the giant spin hall effect of tantalum, Science336, 555 (2012)

    2012

  6. [6]

    Sinova, S

    J. Sinova, S. O. Valenzuela, J. Wunderlich, C. H. Back, and T. Jungwirth, Spin hall effects, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 1213 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    M. N. Baibich, J. M. Broto, A. Fert, F. N. Van Dau, F. Petroff, P. Etienne, G. Creuzet, A. Friederich, and J. Chazelas, Giant magnetoresistance of (001)Fe/(001)Cr magnetic superlattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2472 (1988)

    1988

  8. [8]

    Cubukcu, O

    M. Cubukcu, O. Boulle, M. Drouard, K. Garello, C. Onur Avci, I. Mihai Miron, J. Langer, B. Ocker, P. Gambardella, and G. Gaudin, Spin-orbit torque mag- netization switching of a three-terminal perpendicular magnetic tunnel junction, Appl. Phys. Lett.104, 042406 (2014)

    2014

  9. [9]

    Fukami, C

    S. Fukami, C. Zhang, S. DuttaGupta, A. Kurenkov, and H. Ohno, Magnetization switching by spin–orbit torque in an antiferromagnet–ferromagnet bilayer system, Nat. Mater.15, 535 (2016)

    2016

  10. [10]

    Ikeda, K

    S. Ikeda, K. Miura, H. Yamamoto, K. Mizunuma, H. D. Gan, M. Endo, S. Kanai, J. Hayakawa, F. Matsukura, and H. Ohno, A perpendicular-anisotropy CoFeB-MgO magnetic tunnel junction, Nat. Mater.9, 721 (2010)

    2010

  11. [11]

    Manchon, J

    A. Manchon, J. ˇZelezn´ y, I. M. Miron, T. Jungwirth, J. Sinova, A. Thiaville, K. Garello, and P. Gambardella, Current-induced spin-orbit torques in ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 035004 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    A. R. Mellnik, J. S. Lee, A. Richardella, J. L. Grab, P. J. Mintun, M. H. Fischer, A. Vaezi, A. Manchon, E.-A. Kim, N. Samarth, and D. C. Ralph, Spin-transfer torque generated by a topological insulator, Nature511, 449 (2014)

    2014

  13. [13]

    D. C. Ralph and M. D. Stiles, Spin transfer torques, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.320, 1190 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    Yuasa, T

    S. Yuasa, T. Nagahama, A. Fukushima, Y. Suzuki, and K. Ando, Giant room-temperature magnetoresistance in single-crystal Fe/MgO/Fe magnetic tunnel junctions, Nat. Mater.3, 868 (2004)

    2004

  15. [15]

    Zhang, P

    S. Zhang, P. M. Levy, and A. Fert, Mechanisms of spin- polarized current-driven magnetization switching, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 236601 (2002)

    2002

  16. [16]

    Jarmola, V

    A. Jarmola, V. M. Acosta, K. Jensen, S. Chemerisov, and D. Budker, Temperature- and magnetic-field-dependent longitudinal spin relaxation in nitrogen-vacancy ensem- bles in diamond, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 197601 (2012)

    2012

  17. [17]

    I. V. Bobkova and A. M. Bobkov, Long-range spin imbal- ance in mesoscopic superconductors under zeeman split- ting, JETP Letters101, 118 (2015)

    2015

  18. [18]

    I. V. Bobkova and A. M. Bobkov, Injection of nonequi- librium quasiparticles into zeeman-split superconductors: A way to create long-range spin imbalance, Phys. Rev. B 93, 024513 (2016)

    2016

  19. [19]

    T. T. Heikkil¨ a, M. Silaev, P. Virtanen, and F. S. Bergeret, Thermal, electric and spin transport in superconductor/ferromagnetic-insulator structures, Progress in Surface Science94, 100540 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Krishtop, M

    T. Krishtop, M. Houzet, and J. S. Meyer, Nonequilibrium spin transport in zeeman-split superconductors, Phys. Rev. B91, 121407 (2015)

    2015

  21. [21]

    Silaev, P

    M. Silaev, P. Virtanen, F. S. Bergeret, and T. T. Heikkil¨ a, Long-range spin accumulation from heat injection in mesoscopic superconductors with zeeman splitting, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 167002 (2015)

    2015

  22. [22]

    Silaev, P

    M. Silaev, P. Virtanen, T. T. Heikkil¨ a, and F. S. Bergeret, Spin hanle effect in mesoscopic superconductors, Phys. Rev. B91, 024506 (2015)

    2015

  23. [23]

    M. B. Lundeberg, R. Yang, J. Renard, and J. A. Folk, Defect-mediated spin relaxation and dephasing in graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 156601 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    Tackeuchi, O

    A. Tackeuchi, O. Wada, and Y. Nishikawa, Electron spin relaxation in InGaAs/InP multiple-quantum wells, Appl. Phys. Lett.70, 1131 (1997)

    1997

  25. [25]

    Zihlmann, A

    S. Zihlmann, A. W. Cummings, J. H. Garcia, M. Kedves, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, C. Sch¨ onenberger, and P. Makk, Large spin relaxation anisotropy and valley- zeeman spin-orbit coupling in WSe2/graphene/h-BN het- erostructures, Phys. Rev. B97, 075434 (2018)

    2018

  26. [26]

    Sun, Z.-t

    Q.-f. Sun, Z.-t. Jiang, Y. Yu, and X. C. Xie, Spin super- conductor in ferromagnetic graphene, Phys. Rev. B84, 214501 (2011)

    2011

  27. [27]

    Sun and X

    Q.-f. Sun and X. C. Xie, Spin-polarizedv= 0 state of graphene: A spin superconductor, Phys. Rev. B87, 245427 (2013)

    2013

  28. [28]

    Nakata, K

    K. Nakata, K. A. van Hoogdalem, P. Simon, and D. Loss, Josephson and persistent spin currents in bose-einstein condensates of magnons, Phys. Rev. B90, 144419 (2014)

    2014

  29. [29]

    D. A. Bozhko, A. A. Serga, P. Clausen, V. I. Vasyuchka, F. Heussner, G. A. Melkov, A. Pomyalov, V. S. L’vov, and B. Hillebrands, Supercurrent in a room-temperature bose–einstein magnon condensate, Nat. Phys.12, 1057 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    A. P. Mackenzie and Y. Maeno, The superconductivity of Sr 2RuO4 and the physics of spin-triplet pairing, Rev. Mod. Phys.75, 657 (2003)

    2003

  31. [31]

    F. S. Bergeret, A. F. Volkov, and K. B. Efetov, Odd 10 triplet superconductivity and related phenomena in superconductor-ferromagnet structures, Rev. Mod. Phys. 77, 1321 (2005)

    2005

  32. [32]

    B. T. Zhou, N. F. Q. Yuan, H.-L. Jiang, and K. T. Law, Ising superconductivity and majorana fermions in transition-metal dichalcogenides, Phys. Rev. B93, 180501 (2016)

    2016

  33. [33]

    Lv, Y.-F

    P. Lv, Y.-F. Zhou, N.-X. Yang, and Q.-F. Sun, Magnetoanisotropic spin-triplet andreev reflection in ferromagnet-ising superconductor junctions, Phys. Rev. B97, 144501 (2018)

    2018

  34. [34]

    M¨ ockli and M

    D. M¨ ockli and M. Khodas, Magnetic-field induceds+if pairing in ising superconductors, Phys. Rev. B99, 180505 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    R. M. Lutchyn, J. D. Sau, and S. Das Sarma, Ma- jorana fermions and a topological phase transition in semiconductor-superconductor heterostructures, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 077001 (2010)

    2010

  36. [36]

    Y. Oreg, G. Refael, and F. von Oppen, Helical liquids and majorana bound states in quantum wires, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 177002 (2010)

    2010

  37. [37]

    Mao and Q.-F

    Y. Mao and Q.-F. Sun, Spin phase regulated spin joseph- son supercurrent in topological superconductor, Phys. Rev. B105, 184511 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Y. Mao, Q. Yan, Y.-C. Zhuang, and Q.-F. Sun, Univer- sal spin superconducting diode effect from spin-orbit cou- pling, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 216001 (2024)

    2024

  39. [39]

    Visani, Z

    C. Visani, Z. Sefrioui, J. Tornos, C. Leon, J. Briatico, M. Bibes, A. Barth´ el´ emy, J. Santamar´ ıa, and J. E. Ville- gas, Equal-spin andreev reflection and long-range coher- ent transport in high-temperature superconductor/half- metallic ferromagnet junctions, Nat. Phys.8, 539 (2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging re- search landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    Fedchenko, J

    O. Fedchenko, J. Min´ ar, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’Souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind, L. Wenthaus, M. Scholz, K. Ross- nagel, M. Hoesch, M. Aeschlimann, B. Stadtm¨ uller, M. Kl¨ aui, G. Sch¨ onhense, T. Jungwirth, A. B. Hellenes, G. Jakob, L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and H.-J. Elmers, Ob- servation of time-reversal s...

    2024

  43. [43]

    Krempask´ y, L

    J. Krempask´ y, L. ˇSmejkal, S. W. D’Souza, M. Ha- jlaoui, G. Springholz, K. Uhl´ ıˇ rov´ a, F. Alarab, P. C. Constantinou, V. Strocov, D. Usanov, W. R. Pudelko, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, A. Birk Hellenes, Z. Jansa, H. Reichlov´ a, Z. ˇSob´ aˇ n, R. D. Gonzalez Betancourt, P. Wadley, J. Sinova, D. Kriegner, J. Min´ ar, J. H. Dil, and T. Jungwirth, Alterm...

    2024

  44. [44]

    Reimers, L

    S. Reimers, L. Odenbreit, L. ˇSmejkal, V. N. Strocov, P. Constantinou, A. B. Hellenes, R. Jaeschke Ubiergo, W. H. Campos, V. K. Bharadwaj, A. Chakraborty, T. Denneulin, W. Shi, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, S. Das, M. Kl¨ aui, J. Sinova, and M. Jourdan, Direct observation of altermagnetic band splitting in crsb thin films, Nat. Commun.15, 2116 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L.ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Ef- ficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativis- tic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  46. [46]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  47. [47]

    ˇSmejkal, A

    L. ˇSmejkal, A. B. Hellenes, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Giant and tunneling mag- netoresistance in unconventional collinear antiferromag- nets with nonrelativistic spin-momentum coupling, Phys. Rev. X12, 011028 (2022)

    2022

  48. [48]

    Y.-F. Sun, Y. Mao, Y.-C. Zhuang, and Q.-F. Sun, Tun- neling magnetoresistance effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, 094411 (2025)

    2025

  49. [49]

    Cheng, Y

    Q. Cheng, Y. Mao, and Q.-F. Sun, Field-free josephson diode effect in altermagnet/normal metal/altermagnet junctions, Phys. Rev. B110, 014518 (2024)

    2024

  50. [50]

    S. A. A. Ghorashi, T. L. Hughes, and J. Cano, Altermag- netic routes to majorana modes in zero net magnetiza- tion, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106601 (2024)

    2024

  51. [51]

    Li and C.-C

    Y.-X. Li and C.-C. Liu, Majorana corner modes and tun- able patterns in an altermagnet heterostructure, Phys. Rev. B108, 205410 (2023)

    2023

  52. [52]

    Wan and Q.-F

    Y.-H. Wan and Q.-F. Sun, Altermagnetism-induced par- ity anomaly in weak topological insulators, Phys. Rev. B 111, 045407 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    X.-J. Yi, Y. Mao, X. Lu, and Q.-F. Sun, Spin splitting nernst effect in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 035423 (2025)

    2025

  54. [54]

    X. Duan, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y. Liu, Z. Zhang, I. ˇZuti´ c, and T. Zhou, Antiferroelectric altermagnets: Antiferro- electricity alters magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 106801 (2025)

    2025

  55. [55]

    Wan, Interplay of altermagnetic order and wilson mass in the dirac equation: Helical edge states without time-reversal symmetry, Physical Review B112(2025)

    Y.-H. Wan, Interplay of altermagnetic order and wilson mass in the dirac equation: Helical edge states without time-reversal symmetry, Physical Review B112(2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    W. Chen, X. Zhou, W.-K. Lou, and K. Chang, Magneto- optical conductivity and circular dichroism ind-wave al- termagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 064428 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    Zhu, Z.-Y

    D. Zhu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Topological superconductivity in two-dimensional altermagnetic met- als, Phys. Rev. B108, 184505 (2023)

    2023

  58. [58]

    M. Wei, L. Xiang, F. Xu, L. Zhang, G. Tang, and J. Wang, Gapless superconducting state and mirage gap in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B109, L201404 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    V. S. de Carvalho and H. Freire, Unconventional super- conductivity in altermagnets with spin-orbit coupling, Phys. Rev. B110, L220503 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Maeda, Y

    K. Maeda, Y. Fukaya, K. Yada, B. Lu, Y. Tanaka, and J. Cayao, Classification of pair symmetries in supercon- ductors with unconventional magnetism, Phys. Rev. B 111, 144508 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Chakraborty and A

    D. Chakraborty and A. M. Black-Schaffer, Constraints on superconducting pairing in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, 014516 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    J. E. Hirsch, Spin hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 1834 (1999)

    1999

  63. [63]

    Tserkovnyak, A

    Y. Tserkovnyak, A. Brataas, and G. E. W. Bauer, Spin pumping and magnetization dynamics in metallic multi- layers, Phys. Rev. B66, 224403 (2002)

    2002

  64. [64]

    Mourik, K

    V. Mourik, K. Zuo, S. M. Frolov, S. R. Plissard, and E. P. A. M. Bakkers, Signatures of majorana fermions in 11 hybrid superconductor-semiconductor nanowire devices, Science336, 1003 (2012)

    2012

  65. [65]

    G. Wang, T. Dvir, G. P. Mazur, C.-X. Liu, N. Van Loo, S. L. D. Ten Haaf, A. Bordin, S. Gazibegovic, G. Badawy, E. P. A. M. Bakkers, M. Wimmer, and L. P. Kouwen- hoven, Singlet and triplet cooper pair splitting in hybrid superconducting nanowires, Nature612, 448 (2022)

    2022

  66. [66]

    T. D. Stanescu, J. D. Sau, R. M. Lutchyn, and S. Das Sarma, Proximity effect at the superconductor– topological insulator interface, Phys. Rev. B81, 241310 (2010)

    2010

  67. [67]

    A. F. Volkov, P. H. C. Magn´ ee, B. J. van Wees, and T. M. Klapwijk, Proximity and josephson effects in superconductor-two-dimensional electron gas planar junctions, Physica C: Superconductivity242, 261 (1995)

    1995

  68. [68]

    Z. Zhu, R. Huang, X. Chen, X. Duan, and J. Zhang, Altermagnetic proximity effect (2025), arXiv:2509.06790

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Wang, Q.-f

    D.-K. Wang, Q.-f. Sun, and H. Guo, Spin-battery and spin-current transport through a quantum dot, Phys. Rev. B69, 205312 (2004)

    2004

  70. [70]

    Y.-X. Dai, Y. Mao, and Q.-F. Sun, Spin transport in a normal metal–ising superconductor junction, Phys. Rev. B106, 184513 (2022)

    2022

  71. [71]

    Meir and N

    Y. Meir and N. S. Wingreen, Landauer formula for the current through an interacting electron region, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 2512 (1992)

    1992

  72. [72]

    Lv, A.-M

    P. Lv, A.-M. Guo, H. Li, C. Liu, X. C. Xie, and Q.-F. Sun, Spin-flip reflection at the normal metal-spin super- conductor interface, Phys. Rev. B95, 104516 (2017)

    2017

  73. [73]

    J. J. He, T. K. Ng, P. A. Lee, and K. T. Law, Selec- tive equal-spin andreev reflections induced by majorana fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 037001 (2014)

    2014

  74. [74]

    Mao and Q.-F

    Y. Mao and Q.-F. Sun, Charge and spin transport through a normal lead coupled to ans-wave supercon- ductor and a majorana zero mode, Phys. Rev. B103, 115411 (2021)

    2021

  75. [75]

    Balian and N

    R. Balian and N. R. Werthamer, Superconductivity with pairs in a relativepwave, Phys. Rev.131, 1553 (1963)

    1963

  76. [76]

    G. Tang, C. Bruder, and W. Belzig, Magnetic field- induced “mirage” gap in an ising superconductor, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 237001 (2021)

    2021

  77. [77]

    Zhuang and Q.-F

    Y. Zhuang and Q.-F. Sun, Anomalous photon-assisted tunneling in periodically driven majorana nanowires and bcs charge measurement, Phys. Rev. B105, 165148 (2022)

    2022

  78. [78]

    K. T. Law, P. A. Lee, and T. K. Ng, Majorana fermion in- duced resonant andreev reflection, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 237001 (2009)

    2009

  79. [79]

    Fu and C

    L. Fu and C. L. Kane, Time reversal polarization and a Z2 adiabatic spin pump, Phys. Rev. B74, 195312 (2006)

    2006