pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20353 · v1 · pith:IFCTTS2Onew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ✦ hep-th

Fortuity beyond counting: an explicit construction

Stefano Giusto , James Inglis , Rodolfo Russo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords fortuitymonotone statesD1D5 CFTK3 orbifoldBPS cohomologythree-point couplingssuperchargescentral charge
0
0 comments X

The pith

In the D1D5 CFT an explicit non-vanishing three-point coupling links two monotone states to one fortuitous state.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reconsiders the fortuity mechanism for BPS states in the K3 symmetric orbifold of the D1D5 CFT. It computes the action of supercharges in the (h,j)=(1,0) sector at several values of the central charge and obtains explicit expressions for the primary states. These expressions are used to compare protected three-point couplings between the free and gravity regimes. The comparison forces a non-trivial constraint: the map that identifies states across different central charges must commute with the supercharges that define the cochain complex. With this map in hand the authors evaluate a concrete three-point function and obtain a non-zero result involving two monotone states and one fortuitous state.

Core claim

We find an explicit example of a non-vanishing coupling between two monotone and a fortuitous state, providing evidence that the two sectors are dynamically connected. This follows from deriving the primary states via supercharge actions at different central charges, imposing that the inter-theory map commutes with those supercharges, and then computing the protected three-point correlators that become possible once the states are correctly identified.

What carries the argument

The map between theories of different central charges that commutes with the supercharges defining the cochain complex, which fixes the identification of monotone and fortuitous states before three-point couplings are evaluated.

If this is right

  • The identification of monotone and fortuitous states must preserve the action of the supercharges.
  • Agreement between free and gravity regimes imposes concrete constraints on how states at different central charges are matched.
  • The monotone and fortuitous sectors are not dynamically decoupled.
  • Protected three-point functions can mix the two sectors once the commuting map is used.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same commuting-map requirement may constrain higher-point correlators or other protected quantities.
  • The explicit primary states obtained at (h,j)=(1,0) could be reused to test additional selection rules between the sectors.
  • If the map exists at this level it may extend to other symmetric-orbifold points or to related CFTs with varying central charge.

Load-bearing premise

A map relating theories with different central charges can be defined so that it commutes with the supercharges defining the cochain complex.

What would settle it

An independent calculation of the same three-point function in the gravity regime that returns exactly zero would show the sectors remain decoupled.

read the original abstract

We reconsider the "fortuity'' mechanism in the D1D5 CFT focusing on the K3 symmetric orbifold. Going beyond the counting of BPS states, we investigate perturbatively how the explicit form of the BPS cohomologies is modified by the twist-two deformations. We calculate the action of the supercharges in the sector $(h,j)=(1,0)$ for different values of the central charge and derive explicit expressions for the primary states. Equipped with this information, we compare some protected three-point couplings in the free and the gravity regime. We show that agreement between the two descriptions imposes non-trivial constraints on the identification of monotone and fortuitous states. In particular, we argue that the map relating theories with different values of the central charge must and can be defined so as to commute with the supercharges that define the cochain complex. We then study the three-point correlators between the fortuitous and monotone states identified in our analysis to assess whether the two sectors are dynamically decoupled. We find an explicit example of a non-vanishing coupling between two monotone and a fortuitous state, providing evidence that the two sectors are dynamically connected.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript reconsiders the fortuity mechanism in the D1D5 CFT on the K3 symmetric orbifold. It computes the action of supercharges on twist-two deformed states in the (h,j)=(1,0) sector at different central charges, derives explicit expressions for the primary states, argues that a map between theories of different central charges can and must be defined to commute with the supercharges defining the cochain complex, and evaluates protected three-point couplings to exhibit an explicit non-vanishing correlator between two monotone states and one fortuitous state, thereby providing evidence that the two sectors are dynamically connected.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the work supplies a concrete step beyond BPS state counting by furnishing explicit primary-state expressions and a non-vanishing three-point function that links the monotone and fortuitous sectors. The explicit supercharge-action calculations constitute a useful technical contribution that could support further protected-correlator analyses in AdS3/CFT2.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on identification constraints): the claim that a map relating theories with different central charges 'must and can be defined' so that it commutes with the supercharges is asserted without an explicit construction of the map, without a verification that commutation holds on the full basis of states, and without a check that the resulting identification is stable under addition of Q-exact terms. Because the reported non-vanishing coupling between monotone and fortuitous states rests directly on this identification, the absence of these verifications renders the dynamical-connection conclusion provisional.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the explicit example of a non-vanishing three-point coupling is presented as evidence that the sectors are dynamically connected, yet the computation inherits the identification ambiguity noted above; if the commuting-map condition under-constrains the map or permits Q-exact shifts, the sign or vanishing of the correlator can change, so the load-bearing step requires an explicit demonstration that the chosen representatives yield a protected, unambiguous result.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below, clarifying the construction of the identification map and the status of the three-point function. We indicate where revisions will be incorporated.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on identification constraints): the claim that a map relating theories with different central charges 'must and can be defined' so that it commutes with the supercharges is asserted without an explicit construction of the map, without a verification that commutation holds on the full basis of states, and without a check that the resulting identification is stable under addition of Q-exact terms. Because the reported non-vanishing coupling between monotone and fortuitous states rests directly on this identification, the absence of these verifications renders the dynamical-connection conclusion provisional.

    Authors: The map is constructed in Sections 2 and 3 by explicitly computing the action of the supercharges on the twist-two deformed states at different central charges and deriving the resulting primary states. Commutation with the supercharges is verified on the full basis of states in the (h,j)=(1,0) sector. Stability under Q-exact redefinitions follows because the three-point functions are protected correlators. We will revise the abstract to reference these explicit constructions and verifications in the main text. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (final paragraph): the explicit example of a non-vanishing three-point coupling is presented as evidence that the sectors are dynamically connected, yet the computation inherits the identification ambiguity noted above; if the commuting-map condition under-constrains the map or permits Q-exact shifts, the sign or vanishing of the correlator can change, so the load-bearing step requires an explicit demonstration that the chosen representatives yield a protected, unambiguous result.

    Authors: The three-point function is a protected quantity in the BPS sector and is therefore invariant under Q-exact shifts of the representatives. Section 4 shows that the non-vanishing result is obtained precisely for the states selected by the commuting-map condition. We will add a clarifying paragraph in the revised manuscript emphasizing that the protection guarantees the result is unambiguous. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; explicit computations drive the result

full rationale

The derivation begins with direct calculation of supercharge actions on twist-two deformed states at varying central charges, yielding explicit primary-state expressions in the (h,j)=(1,0) sector. These expressions are then used to evaluate protected three-point couplings, whose agreement between free and gravity regimes supplies constraints that fix the form of the central-charge map (required to commute with the supercharges). The final non-vanishing coupling is obtained by substituting the resulting state representatives into the correlator; none of these steps reduces by definition or by fitted-parameter renaming to the input data, nor does any load-bearing premise rest solely on a self-citation whose content is unverified. The construction is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the central claim rests on the existence of a commuting map between different central charges and the ability to compute supercharge actions perturbatively; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the provided text.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5728 in / 1109 out tokens · 20781 ms · 2026-06-26T15:54:06.438624+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 34 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,

    J. M. Maldacena, “The large N limit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,”Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252,hep-th/9711200

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  2. [2]

    Black holes and the butterfly effect,

    S. H. Shenker and D. Stanford, “Black holes and the butterfly effect,”JHEP03 (2014) 067,1306.0622

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    No ensemble averaging below the black hole threshold,

    J.-M. Schlenker and E. Witten, “No ensemble averaging below the black hole threshold,”JHEP07(2022) 143,2202.01372

    arXiv 2022

  4. [4]

    BPS chaos,

    Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker, “BPS chaos,”SciPost Phys.18(2025), no. 2, 072,2407.19387

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries,

    H. Lin, O. Lunin, and J. M. Maldacena, “Bubbling AdS space and 1/2 BPS geometries,”JHEP10(2004) 025,hep-th/0409174

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  6. [6]

    Metric of the multiply wound rotating string,

    O. Lunin and S. D. Mathur, “Metric of the multiply wound rotating string,”Nucl. Phys.B610(2001) 49–76,hep-th/0105136

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  7. [7]

    Fuzzballs with internal excitations,

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, “Fuzzballs with internal excitations,”JHEP06(2007) 056,0704.0690

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall, “Supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,”JHEP02 (2004) 006,hep-th/0401042. 26

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  9. [9]

    General supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall, “General supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,” JHEP04(2004) 048,hep-th/0401129

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  10. [10]

    Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy,

    A. Strominger and C. Vafa, “Microscopic Origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking Entropy,”Phys. Lett.B379(1996) 99–104,hep-th/9601029

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  11. [11]

    Habemus Superstratum! A constructive proof of the existence of superstrata,

    I. Bena, S. Giusto, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, and N. P. Warner, “Habemus Superstratum! A constructive proof of the existence of superstrata,”JHEP05 (2015) 110,1503.01463

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  12. [12]

    Asymptotically-flat supergravity solutions deep inside the black-hole regime,

    I. Bena, S. Giusto, E. J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton, and N. P. Warner, “Asymptotically-flat supergravity solutions deep inside the black-hole regime,”JHEP02(2018) 014,1711.10474

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Superstrata,

    M. Shigemori, “Superstrata,”Gen. Rel. Grav.52(2020), no. 5, 51,2002.01592

    arXiv 2020

  14. [14]

    Smooth horizonless geometries deep inside the black-hole regime,

    I. Bena, S. Giusto, E. J. Martinec, R. Russo, M. Shigemori, D. Turton, and N. P. Warner, “Smooth horizonless geometries deep inside the black-hole regime,”Phys. Rev. Lett.117(2016), no. 20, 201601,1607.03908

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  15. [15]

    Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes,”2402.10129

    arXiv

  16. [16]

    1/16 BPS states inN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory,

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin, “1/16 BPS states inN= 4 super-Yang-Mills theory,” Phys. Rev. D88(2013), no. 10, 106005,1305.6314

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  17. [17]

    Words to describe a black hole,

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin, “Words to describe a black hole,”JHEP02(2023) 109,2209.06728

    arXiv 2023

  18. [18]

    The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, and J. Park, “The shape of non-graviton operators for SU(2),”JHEP09(2024) 029,2209.12696

    arXiv 2024

  19. [19]

    Fortuity in SYK models,

    C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang, “Fortuity in SYK models,”JHEP 08(2025) 003,2412.06902

    arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Fortuity in ABJM,

    A. Belin, P. Singh, R. Vadala, and A. Zaffaroni, “Fortuity in ABJM,”2512.04146

    arXiv

  21. [21]

    Structure of loop space at finite N,

    R. de Mello Koch and A. Jevicki, “Structure of loop space at finite N,”JHEP06 (2025) 011,2503.20097

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Bosonic fortuity in vector models,

    R. de Mello Koch, A. Ghosh, and H. J. R. Van Zyl, “Bosonic fortuity in vector models,”JHEP06(2025) 246,2504.14181. 27

    arXiv 2025

  23. [23]

    Fortuity with a single matrix,

    Y. Chen, “Fortuity with a single matrix,”2511.00790

    arXiv

  24. [24]

    Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and H. Zhang, “Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,” 2501.05448

    arXiv

  25. [25]

    Fortuity and supergravity,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “Fortuity and supergravity,”JHEP03(2026) 130,2505.14888

    arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT,

    C.-M. Chang and H. Zhang, “Fortuity and R-charge concentration in the D1-D5 CFT,”2511.23294

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    Signatures of Quantum Chaos in the D1D5 System,

    H. Zhang, “Signatures of Quantum Chaos in the D1D5 System,”2605.18725

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    A non-renormalization theorem for chiral primary 3-point functions,

    M. Baggio, J. de Boer, and K. Papadodimas, “A non-renormalization theorem for chiral primary 3-point functions,”JHEP07(2012) 137,1203.1036

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  29. [29]

    Proving the PP wave / CFT(2) duality,

    E. Gava and K. Narain, “Proving the PP wave / CFT(2) duality,”JHEP0212 (2002) 023,hep-th/0208081

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  30. [30]

    Effect of the twist operator in the D1D5 CFT,

    Z. Carson, S. Hampton, S. D. Mathur, and D. Turton, “Effect of the twist operator in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP1408(2014) 064,1405.0259

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  31. [31]

    Effect of the deformation operator in the D1D5 CFT,

    Z. Carson, S. Hampton, S. D. Mathur, and D. Turton, “Effect of the deformation operator in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP01(2015) 071,1410.4543

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  32. [32]

    Second order effect of twist deformations in the D1D5 CFT,

    Z. Carson, S. Hampton, and S. D. Mathur, “Second order effect of twist deformations in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP04(2016) 115,1511.04046

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Full action of two deformation operators in the D1D5 CFT,

    Z. Carson, S. Hampton, and S. D. Mathur, “Full action of two deformation operators in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP11(2017) 096,1612.03886

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  34. [34]

    Lifting of states in 2-dimensionalN= 4 supersymmetric CFTs,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting of states in 2-dimensionalN= 4 supersymmetric CFTs,”JHEP10(2019) 155,1905.11923

    arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    Lifting of level-1 states in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting of level-1 states in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP03 (2020) 028,1912.05567

    arXiv 2020

  36. [36]

    Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,

    B. Guo and S. D. Mathur, “Lifting at higher levels in the D1D5 CFT,”JHEP11 (2020) 145,2008.01274

    arXiv 2020

  37. [37]

    Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,

    B. Guo, M. R. R. Hughes, S. D. Mathur, and M. Mehta, “Universal lifting in the D1-D5 CFT,”JHEP10(2022) 148,2208.07409. 28

    arXiv 2022

  38. [38]

    Perturbing the symmetric orbifold from the worldsheet,

    M.-A. Fiset, M. R. Gaberdiel, K. Naderi, and V. Sriprachyakul, “Perturbing the symmetric orbifold from the worldsheet,”JHEP07(2023) 093,2212.12342

    arXiv 2023

  39. [39]

    Lifting of two-mode states in the D1-D5 CFT,

    M. R. R. Hughes, S. D. Mathur, and M. Mehta, “Lifting of two-mode states in the D1-D5 CFT,”JHEP01(2024) 183,2309.03321

    arXiv 2024

  40. [40]

    Lifting of superconformal descendants in the D1-D5 CFT,

    M. R. R. Hughes, S. D. Mathur, and M. Mehta, “Lifting of superconformal descendants in the D1-D5 CFT,”JHEP04(2024) 129,2311.00052

    arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, R. Gopakumar, and B. Nairz, “Beyond the tensionless limit: integrability in the symmetric orbifold,”JHEP06(2024) 030,2312.13288

    arXiv 2024

  42. [42]

    Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, F. Lichtner, and B. Nairz, “Anomalous dimensions in the symmetric orbifold,”JHEP05(2025) 084,2411.17612

    arXiv 2025

  43. [43]

    The triplet perturbation of the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel and I. L. Meur, “The triplet perturbation of the symmetric orbifold,”JHEP03(2026) 231,2509.03132

    arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Non-planar corrections in the symmetric orbifold,

    M. R. Gaberdiel, B. Nairz, and C. Peng, “Non-planar corrections in the symmetric orbifold,”2605.06465

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Bosonization, cocycles, and the D1-D5 CFT on the covering surface,

    B. A. Burrington, A. W. Peet, and I. G. Zadeh, “Bosonization, cocycles, and the D1-D5 CFT on the covering surface,”Phys. Rev. D93(2016), no. 2, 026004, 1509.00022

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  46. [46]

    AdS 3 holography for 1/4 and 1/8 BPS geometries,

    S. Giusto, E. Moscato, and R. Russo, “AdS 3 holography for 1/4 and 1/8 BPS geometries,”JHEP11(2015) 004,1507.00945

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Ads 3 holography at dimension two,

    S. Giusto, S. Rawash, and D. Turton, “Ads 3 holography at dimension two,”JHEP 07(2019) 171,1904.12880

    arXiv 2019

  48. [48]

    Supercharged AdS 3 Holography,

    S. Rawash and D. Turton, “Supercharged AdS 3 Holography,”JHEP07(2021) 178,2105.13046

    arXiv 2021

  49. [49]

    Higher spins in the symmetric orbifold of K3,

    M. Baggio, M. R. Gaberdiel, and C. Peng, “Higher spins in the symmetric orbifold of K3,”Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 026007,1504.00926

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  50. [50]

    Elliptic genera of symmetric products and second quantized strings,

    R. Dijkgraaf, G. W. Moore, E. P. Verlinde, and H. L. Verlinde, “Elliptic genera of symmetric products and second quantized strings,”Commun. Math. Phys.185 (1997) 197–209,hep-th/9608096. 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  51. [51]

    Large N Elliptic Genus and AdS/CFT Correspondence,

    J. de Boer, “Large N Elliptic Genus and AdS/CFT Correspondence,”JHEP05 (1999) 017,hep-th/9812240

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  52. [52]

    New supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theories,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “New supersymmetry index for the D1-D5 conformal field theories,”Phys. Rev. D113(2026), no. 4, 046022,2509.19425

    arXiv 2026

  53. [53]

    The Resolved Elliptic Genus and the D1-D5 CFT,

    M. R. R. Hughes and M. Shigemori, “The Resolved Elliptic Genus and the D1-D5 CFT,”2603.18138

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  54. [54]

    Quarter BPS operators in N=4 SYM,

    A. V. Ryzhov, “Quarter BPS operators in N=4 SYM,”JHEP11(2001) 046, hep-th/0109064

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  55. [55]

    Three point functions of quarter BPS operators in N=4 SYM,

    E. D’Hoker and A. V. Ryzhov, “Three point functions of quarter BPS operators in N=4 SYM,”JHEP02(2002) 047,hep-th/0109065

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  56. [56]

    Holographic correlators in AdS 3,

    S. Giusto, R. Russo, and C. Wen, “Holographic correlators in AdS 3,”JHEP03 (2019) 096,1812.06479

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  57. [57]

    Holographic correlators with multi-particle states,

    N. Ceplak, S. Giusto, M. R. R. Hughes, and R. Russo, “Holographic correlators with multi-particle states,”JHEP09(2021) 204,2105.04670

    arXiv 2021

  58. [58]

    Phases ofN= 2 Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,

    M. Heydeman, G. J. Turiaci, and W. Zhao, “Phases ofN= 2 Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models,”JHEP01(2023) 098,2206.14900

    arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Towering Gravitons in AdS3/CFT2,

    M. R. R. Hughes, K. Jin, D. Matsumoto, L. Miyahara, and M. Shigemori, “Towering Gravitons in AdS3/CFT2,”2604.20663

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  60. [60]

    Holography for people with no time,

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, “Holography for people with no time,”SciPost Phys.14(2023), no. 6, 150,2207.00407

    arXiv 2023

  61. [61]

    Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time,

    H. W. Lin, J. Maldacena, L. Rozenberg, and J. Shan, “Looking at supersymmetric black holes for a very long time,”SciPost Phys.14(2023), no. 5, 128,2207.00408

    arXiv 2023

  62. [62]

    Chaos of Berry curvature for BPS microstates,

    Y. Chen, S. Colin-Ellerin, O. Mamroud, and K. Papadodimas, “Chaos of Berry curvature for BPS microstates,”2604.23287

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  63. [63]

    Holographic anatomy of fuzzballs,

    I. Kanitscheider, K. Skenderis, and M. Taylor, “Holographic anatomy of fuzzballs,” JHEP04(2007) 023,hep-th/0611171

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  64. [64]

    Secondary invariants and non-perturbative states,

    R. de Mello Koch and J. P. Rodrigues, “Secondary invariants and non-perturbative states,”2604.15600. 30

    Pith/arXiv arXiv