pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20522 · v1 · pith:SVGU4TEDnew · submitted 2026-06-18 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · quant-ph

Transfer-matrix functions for algebraically decaying interactions in variational infinite matrix product states

Qi Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 15:17 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el quant-ph
keywords infinite matrix product stateslong-range interactionstransfer matrixalgebraic decayvariational optimizationpolylogarithmcritical points
0
0 comments X

The pith

Algebraic tails in infinite MPS are summed directly by applying a polylogarithm matrix function to the connected transfer matrix.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a way to perform variational iMPS calculations for Hamiltonians with algebraically decaying interactions without first replacing them by finite-pole exponential surrogates. For any fixed finite bond dimension, the interaction tail e^{i Q r}/r^α is encoded exactly as the action of the matrix function F_{α,Q}(z) = Li_α(e^{i Q} z)/z on the connected transfer matrix. This representation is evaluated with a Krylov solver and differentiated via a Fréchet adjoint plus implicit fixed-point differentiation to obtain stable variational gradients. Benchmarks on free-fermion and inverse-square Heisenberg chains, including the Haldane-Shastry point, show that the resulting energies and correlation functions match the target algebraic Hamiltonian. At a known critical field the surrogate approach shifts a diagnostic away from criticality while the matrix-function method retains the expected signatures.

Core claim

For a fixed finite-D MPS, the algebraic tail e^{iQr}/r^α is represented by the matrix function F_{α,Q}(~T_A) with F_{α,Q}(z)=Li_α(e^{iQ} z)/z, allowing direct summation through the connected transfer matrix without a finite-pole surrogate.

What carries the argument

The matrix function F_{α,Q}(z)=Li_α(e^{i Q} z)/z that encodes the algebraic tail when applied to the connected transfer matrix.

If this is right

  • The variational energy functional for any fixed MPS can be evaluated directly on the target algebraic Hamiltonian.
  • Critical signatures remain unbiased at known critical points where surrogate representations introduce shifts.
  • The same transfer-matrix-function construction applies to both free-fermion and interacting long-range models such as the Haldane-Shastry chain.
  • Gradients required for variational optimization are obtained without additional approximation beyond the Krylov and adjoint steps.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method removes a controllable source of systematic error when mapping phase diagrams of long-range quantum spin chains.
  • Similar matrix-function representations could be derived for other slowly decaying kernels if their generating functions admit stable evaluation on the transfer matrix.
  • The approach suggests that any finite-pole truncation introduces a representation bias whose size grows with the range of the interaction.

Load-bearing premise

The matrix function can be evaluated stably by Krylov iteration and its gradients obtained reliably by Fréchet adjoint plus implicit differentiation at the bond dimensions and lengths used.

What would settle it

A variational calculation at the independently known critical field of the inverse-square Heisenberg chain in which the finite-pole surrogate shifts a critical diagnostic away from the true point while the matrix-function result remains at the expected location.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20522 by Qi Yang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Tail summation with transfer matrix function. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Accuracy versus Krylov dimension [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Long-range free-fermion string-channel benchmark. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Finite-entanglement scaling for Eq. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Inverse-square Heisenberg energy and correlator bench [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Comparison between the SOE-MPO and transfer [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Variational infinite matrix product state (iMPS) calculations usually make Hamiltonians with algebraically decaying interactions compatible with standard MPO algorithms by first replacing the target Hamiltonian with a finite-pole sum-of-exponentials surrogate, thereby introducing a Hamiltonian-representation residual. We formulate the fixed-$D$ variational energy without introducing such a surrogate. For a fixed finite-$D$ MPS, the algebraic tail can be summed directly through the connected transfer matrix: the tail $e^{\mathrm{i} Qr}/r^\alpha$ is represented by the matrix function $F_{\alpha,Q}(\widetilde{T}_A)$, with $F_{\alpha,Q}(z)=\operatorname{Li}_\alpha(e^{\mathrm{i} Q}\,z)/z$. We evaluate the resulting matrix-function action using a Krylov method and obtain stable gradients by combining a Fr\'echet adjoint with implicit fixed-point differentiation. Benchmarks on long-range free fermions and the inverse-square Heisenberg family, including the Haldane--Shastry point, validate the transfer-matrix-function formulation. A long-range Ising-chain calculation illustrates a practical consequence of avoiding a finite-pole Hamiltonian representation. At a fixed, independently known critical field, finite-pole surrogate Hamiltonians can bias a critical diagnostic away from criticality, whereas the matrix-function calculation retains the expected critical signatures of the target algebraic Hamiltonian.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a transfer-matrix function method for variational iMPS calculations with algebraically decaying interactions. For fixed finite bond dimension D, the tail e^{iQr}/r^α is represented exactly (without surrogate) as the matrix function F_{α,Q}(~T_A) = Li_α(e^{iQ} z)/z acting on the connected transfer matrix ~T_A; this is evaluated via Krylov iteration, with gradients obtained from the Fréchet adjoint combined with implicit fixed-point differentiation. The approach is benchmarked on long-range free fermions, the inverse-square Heisenberg chain (including the exactly solvable Haldane-Shastry point), and a long-range Ising model, where it is shown to avoid the critical-diagnostic bias introduced by finite-pole surrogates.

Significance. If the numerical claims hold, the method supplies a parameter-free route to faithful variational energies for long-range systems inside the standard iMPS transfer-matrix language, removing a source of Hamiltonian-representation error that can shift apparent criticality. The direct polylogarithm representation and the combination of Krylov evaluation with Fréchet/implicit gradients constitute a clean technical advance that strengthens tensor-network applicability to algebraically decaying Hamiltonians.

major comments (1)
  1. [Benchmarks] Benchmarks section: the validation on free fermions and inverse-square Heisenberg models is presented as confirming stable Krylov evaluation and reliable gradients, yet the manuscript supplies neither error bars, explicit dependence on Krylov subspace dimension, nor convergence checks with respect to truncation; this leaves the central numerical support for the stability claim only partially documented.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive evaluation and the recommendation of minor revision. The single major comment is addressed below; we will strengthen the numerical documentation as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Benchmarks] Benchmarks section: the validation on free fermions and inverse-square Heisenberg models is presented as confirming stable Krylov evaluation and reliable gradients, yet the manuscript supplies neither error bars, explicit dependence on Krylov subspace dimension, nor convergence checks with respect to truncation; this leaves the central numerical support for the stability claim only partially documented.

    Authors: We agree that the benchmarks would be strengthened by explicit quantitative checks. In the revised manuscript we will add (i) error bars on all reported energies (from repeated optimizations with different random seeds), (ii) a supplementary figure or table showing the dependence of the matrix-function action and final variational energy on Krylov subspace dimension, and (iii) convergence data versus the internal truncation threshold used inside the Krylov iteration. These additions will be placed in the benchmarks section and will directly support the stability claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity

full rationale

The paper's derivation is a direct re-expression of the algebraic tail sum inside the iMPS transfer-matrix formalism, defining F_{\alpha,Q}(z) = Li_\alpha(e^{iQ} z)/z explicitly from the known polylogarithm and applying it to the connected transfer matrix \widetilde{T}_A. This is a mathematical identity for fixed finite-D MPS, not a fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No self-citations appear as load-bearing steps, no uniqueness theorems are imported from prior author work, and no ansatz is smuggled via citation. Benchmarks on free fermions, Haldane-Shastry, and long-range Ising provide external validation against known physics, confirming the chain is self-contained without reduction to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The claim rests on standard properties of the polylogarithm and the iMPS transfer-matrix formalism; no free parameters, new entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • standard math The polylogarithm Li_α(z) defines a matrix function that correctly encodes the algebraic decay when applied to the transfer matrix.
    Invoked in the definition F_{α,Q}(z)=Li_α(e^{iQ} z)/z.
  • domain assumption The connected transfer matrix of an infinite MPS captures the contribution of the interaction tail to the variational energy.
    Standard assumption in iMPS literature used to justify direct summation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5761 in / 1391 out tokens · 33572 ms · 2026-06-26T15:17:03.453074+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    over1 ≤r≤R max and encoded as K poles in an MPO. Fig. 6 uses Rmax = 10 4 and K = 5 , 10, 15, 20. Across this sequence the absolute tail residual decreases from4 .4 × 10−4 to2 .8 × 10−6. This gives a systematic finite-polesequence, notastatementabouttheasymptotic capability of SOE-MPOs: increasingK can systematically reduce the residual and extend the reli...

    2020

  2. [2]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Exact Jastrow–Gutzwiller resonating- valence-bond ground state of the spin-1/2antiferromag- netic Heisenberg chain with1/r2 exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 635 (1988)

    1988

  3. [3]

    B. S. Shastry, Exact solution of anS = 1/2Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain with long-ranged interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.60, 639 (1988)

    1988

  4. [4]

    Rev.96, 99 (1954)

    M.A.RudermanandC.Kittel,Indirectexchangecoupling of nuclear magnetic moments by conduction electrons, Phys. Rev.96, 99 (1954)

    1954

  5. [5]

    Kasuya, A theory of metallic ferro- and antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s model, Prog

    T. Kasuya, A theory of metallic ferro- and antiferro- magnetism on Zener’s model, Prog. Theor. Phys.16, 45 (1956)

    1956

  6. [6]

    Yosida, Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys, Phys

    K. Yosida, Magnetic properties of Cu-Mn alloys, Phys. Rev.106, 893 (1957)

    1957

  7. [7]

    Argüello-Luengo, A

    J. Argüello-Luengo, A. González-Tudela, and D. González- Cuadra, Tuning long-range fermion-mediated interactions in cold-atom quantum simulators, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 083401 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    Defenu, T

    N. Defenu, T. Donner, T. Macrì, G. Pagano, S. Ruffo, and A. Trombettoni, Long-range interacting quantum systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.95, 035002 (2023)

    2023

  9. [9]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  10. [10]

    Browaeys and T

    A. Browaeys and T. Lahaye, Many-body physics with individually controlled Rydberg atoms, Nat. Phys.16, 132 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Lahaye, C

    T. Lahaye, C. Menotti, L. Santos, M. Lewenstein, and T. Pfau, The physics of dipolar bosonic quantum gases, Rep. Prog. Phys.72, 126401 (2009)

    2009

  12. [12]

    Micheli, G

    A. Micheli, G. K. Brennen, and P. Zoller, A toolbox for lattice-spin models with polar molecules, Nat. Phys.2, 341 (2006)

    2006

  13. [13]

    Verstraete, V

    F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac, Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems, Adv. Phys.57, 143 (2008)

    2008

  14. [14]

    Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys

    G. Vidal, Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 070201 (2007)

    2007

  15. [15]

    Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann

    U. Schollwöck, The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 326, 96 (2011)

    2011

  16. [16]

    Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann

    R. Orús, A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)349, 117 (2014)

    2014

  17. [17]

    G. M. Crosswhite, A. C. Doherty, and G. Vidal, Applying matrix product operators to model systems with long- range interactions, Phys. Rev. B78, 035116 (2008)

    2008

  18. [18]

    Pirvu, V

    B. Pirvu, V. Murg, J. I. Cirac, and F. Verstraete, Matrix productoperatorrepresentations,NewJ.Phys.12,025012 (2010)

    2010

  19. [19]

    M. P. Zaletel, R. S. K. Mong, C. Karrasch, J. E. Moore, and F. Pollmann, Time-evolving a matrix product state with long-ranged interactions, Phys. Rev. B91, 165112 (2015)

    2015

  20. [20]

    Hubig, I

    C. Hubig, I. P. McCulloch, and U. Schollwöck, Generic construction of efficient matrix product operators, Phys. Rev. B95, 035129 (2017)

    2017

  21. [21]

    Z. Li, M. J. O’Rourke, and G. K.-L. Chan, Generalization of the exponential basis for tensor network representations of long-range interactions in two and three dimensions, Phys. Rev. B100, 155121 (2019)

    2019

  22. [22]

    Luijten and H

    E. Luijten and H. W. J. Blöte, Boundary between long- range and short-range critical behavior in systems with algebraic interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 025703 (2002)

    2002

  23. [23]

    Blanchard, M

    T. Blanchard, M. Picco, and M. A. Rajabpour, Influence of long-range interactions on the critical behavior of the Ising model, EPL101, 56003 (2013)

    2013

  24. [24]

    M. C. Angelini, G. Parisi, and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, Rela- tions between short-range and long-range Ising models, Phys. Rev. E89, 062120 (2014)

    2014

  25. [25]

    Horita, H

    T. Horita, H. Suwa, and S. Todo, Upper and lower critical decay exponents of Ising ferromagnets with long-range interaction, Phys. Rev. E95, 012143 (2017)

    2017

  26. [26]

    Shiratani and S

    S. Shiratani and S. Todo, Stochastic parameter optimiza- tion analysis of dynamical quantum critical phenomena in long-range transverse-field Ising chain, Phys. Rev. E 110, 064106 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    J. Kim, D. Kim, and D.-H. Kim, Neural-network quantum- statestudyofthelong-rangeantiferromagneticIsingchain, Phys. Rev. E109, 064123 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    T. Xiao, D. Yao, C. Zhang, Z. Fan, and Y. Deng, Two- dimensional XY ferromagnet induced by long-range inter- action, Chinese Phys. Lett.42, 070002 (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    D. Yao, T. Xiao, C. Zhang, Y. Deng, and Z. Fan, Nonclas- sical regime of the two-dimensional long-range XY model: A comprehensive Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B112, 144429 (2025)

    2025

  30. [30]

    Haegeman,Variational Renormalization Group Meth- ods for Extended Quantum Systems, Ph.D

    J. Haegeman,Variational Renormalization Group Meth- ods for Extended Quantum Systems, Ph.D. thesis, Ghent University (2011)

    2011

  31. [31]

    Haegeman, J

    J. Haegeman, J. I. Cirac, T. J. Osborne, and F. Verstraete, Calculus of continuous matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B88, 085118 (2013)

    2013

  32. [32]

    Zauner, D

    V. Zauner, D. Draxler, L. Vanderstraeten, M. Degroote, J. Haegeman, M. M. Rams, V. Stojevic, N. Schuch, and F. Verstraete, Transfer matrices and excitations with matrix product states, New J. Phys.17, 053002 (2015)

    2015

  33. [33]

    Stojevic, J

    V. Stojevic, J. Haegeman, I. P. McCulloch, L. Tagliacozzo, and F. Verstraete, Conformal data from finite entangle- ment scaling, Phys. Rev. B91, 035120 (2015)

    2015

  34. [34]

    Vanhecke, J

    B. Vanhecke, J. Haegeman, K. Van Acoleyen, L. Vander- straeten, and F. Verstraete, Scaling hypothesis for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 250604 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    N. J. Higham,Functions of Matrices: Theory and Compu- tation(Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2008)

    2008

  36. [36]

    L. N. Trefethen and M. Embree,Spectra and Pseudospec- tra: The Behavior of Nonnormal Matrices and Operators (Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2005)

    2005

  37. [37]

    Saad, Analysis of some krylov subspace approximations to the matrix exponential operator, SIAM J

    Y. Saad, Analysis of some krylov subspace approximations to the matrix exponential operator, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 29, 209 (1992)

    1992

  38. [38]

    Güttel, Rational krylov approximation of matrix func- tions: Numerical methods and optimal pole selection, GAMM-Mitteilungen36, 8 (2013)

    S. Güttel, Rational krylov approximation of matrix func- tions: Numerical methods and optimal pole selection, GAMM-Mitteilungen36, 8 (2013)

    2013

  39. [39]

    Liao, J.-G

    H.-J. Liao, J.-G. Liu, L. Wang, and T. Xiang, Differ- entiable programming tensor networks, Phys. Rev. X9, 9 031041 (2019)

    2019

  40. [40]

    Xie, J.-G

    H. Xie, J.-G. Liu, and L. Wang, Automatic differentiation of dominant eigensolver and its applications in quantum physics, Phys. Rev. B101, 245139 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    Francuz, N

    A. Francuz, N. Schuch, and B. Vanhecke, Stable and efficient differentiation of tensor network algorithms, Phys. Rev. Research7, 013237 (2025)

    2025

  42. [42]

    Krämer, P

    N. Krämer, P. Moreno-Muñoz, H. Roy, and S. Hauberg, Gradients of functions of large matrices, inAdv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 37(2024) pp. 49484–49518

    2024

  43. [43]

    Vanderstraeten, J

    L. Vanderstraeten, J. Haegeman, and F. Verstraete, Tangent-space methods for uniform matrix product states, SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes7, 10.21468/SciPostPhysLect- Notes.7 (2019)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipostphyslect- 2019

  44. [44]

    10, 040 (2021)

    M.Hauru, M.VanDamme,andJ.Haegeman,Riemannian optimization of isometric tensor networks, SciPost Phys. 10, 040 (2021)

    2021

  45. [45]

    Devos and J

    L. Devos and J. Haegeman, TensorKit.jl: A Julia package forlarge-scaletensorcomputations, withahintofcategory theory (2025), arXiv:2508.10076 [cs.MS]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  46. [46]

    Devos, M

    L. Devos, M. Van Damme, and J. Haegeman, MPSKit.jl (2026), software, Zenodo concept DOI

    2026

  47. [47]

    Haegeman, OptimKit.jl (2026), software repository, accessed 2026-06-14

    J. Haegeman, OptimKit.jl (2026), software repository, accessed 2026-06-14

    2026

  48. [48]

    Haegeman and M

    J. Haegeman and M. Hauru, TensorKitManifolds.jl (2026), software repository, accessed 2026-06-14

    2026

  49. [49]

    Jordan and E

    P. Jordan and E. Wigner, Über das paulische äquivalen- zverbot, Z. Phys.47, 631 (1928)

    1928

  50. [50]

    E. Lieb, T. Schultz, and D. Mattis, Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.)16, 407 (1961)

    1961

  51. [51]

    Jin and V

    B.-Q. Jin and V. E. Korepin, Quantum spin chain, Toeplitz determinants and the Fisher–Hartwig conjecture, J. Stat. Phys.116, 79 (2004)

    2004

  52. [52]

    Calabrese, M

    P. Calabrese, M. Mintchev, and E. Vicari, Entanglement entropy of one-dimensional gases, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 020601 (2011)

    2011

  53. [53]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Z. N. C. Ha, J. C. Talstra, D. Bernard, and V. Pasquier, Yangian symmetry of integrable quan- tum chains with long-range interactions and a new de- scription of states in conformal field theory, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 2021 (1992)

    2021

  54. [54]

    J. I. Cirac and G. Sierra, Infinite matrix product states, conformal field theory, and the Haldane–Shastry model, Phys. Rev. B81, 104431 (2010)

    2010

  55. [55]

    Gebhard and D

    F. Gebhard and D. Vollhardt, Correlation functions for Hubbard-type models: The exact results for the Gutzwiller wave function in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett.59, 1472 (1987)

    1987

  56. [56]

    H.-H. Tu, A. E. B. Nielsen, J. I. Cirac, and G. Sierra, Lattice Laughlin states of bosons and fermions at filling fractions1/q, New J. Phys.16, 033025 (2014)

    2014

  57. [57]

    H.-H. Tu, A. E. B. Nielsen, and G. Sierra, Quantum spin models for theSU (n)1 Wess–Zumino–Witten model, Nucl. Phys. B886, 328 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    Marshall, Antiferromagnetism, Proc

    W. Marshall, Antiferromagnetism, Proc. R. Soc. A232, 48 (1955)

    1955

  59. [59]

    Calabrese and J

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory, J. Stat. Mech.2004, P06002 (2004)

    2004

  60. [60]

    Tagliacozzo, T

    L. Tagliacozzo, T. R. de Oliveira, S. Iblisdir, and J. I. La- torre, Scaling of entanglement support for matrix product states, Phys. Rev. B78, 024410 (2008)

    2008

  61. [61]

    Pollmann, S

    F. Pollmann, S. Mukerjee, A. M. Turner, and J. E. Moore, Theory of finite-entanglement scaling at one-dimensional quantum critical points, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 255701 (2009)

    2009

  62. [62]

    Pirvu, G

    B. Pirvu, G. Vidal, F. Verstraete, and L. Tagliacozzo, Ma- trix product states for critical spin chains: finite-size ver- sus finite-entanglement scaling, Phys. Rev. B86, 075117 (2012)

    2012

  63. [63]

    Sak, Recursion relations and fixed points for ferromag- nets with long-range interactions, Phys

    J. Sak, Recursion relations and fixed points for ferromag- nets with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. B8, 281 (1973)

    1973

  64. [64]

    J.A.Koziol, A.Langheld, S.C.Kapfer,andK.P.Schmidt, Quantum-critical properties of the long-range transverse- field Ising model from quantum Monte Carlo simulations, Phys. Rev. B103, 245135 (2021)

    2021

  65. [65]

    Defenu, A

    N. Defenu, A. Trombettoni, and A. Codello, Fixed-point structure and effective fractional dimensionality for O(N) models with long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. E92, 052113 (2015)

    2015

  66. [66]

    M. E. Fisher, S.-k. Ma, and B. G. Nickel, Critical expo- nents for long-range interactions, Phys. Rev. Lett.29, 917 (1972)

    1972

  67. [67]

    Dutta and J

    A. Dutta and J. K. Bhattacharjee, Phase transitions in the quantum Ising and rotor models with a long-range interaction, Phys. Rev. B64, 184106 (2001)

    2001

  68. [68]

    Topologi- cal holography, quantum criticality, and boundary states,

    J. Hauschild and F. Pollmann, Efficient numerical sim- ulations with tensor networks: Tensor Network Python (TeNPy), SciPost Phys. Lect. Notes5, 10.21468/SciPost- PhysLectNotes.5 (2018)

    work page doi:10.21468/scipost- 2018

  69. [69]

    transfer-matrix-imps, transfer-matrix-imps: Data and re- production scripts for transfer-matrix-function imps cal- culations (2026), gitHub repository

    2026

  70. [70]

    25.12, Polylogarithms (2026), f

    DLMF, NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, Sec. 25.12, Polylogarithms (2026), f. W. J. Olver, A. B. Olde Daalhuis, D. W. Lozier, B. I. Schneider, R. F. Boisvert, C. W. Clark, B. R. Miller, B. V. Saunders, H. S. Cohl, and M. A. McClain, eds.; Release 1.2.6 of 2026-03-15

    2026

  71. [71]

    Kandolf and S

    P. Kandolf and S. D. Relton, A block Krylov method to compute the action of the Fréchet derivative of a matrix function ona vector with applicationsto conditionnumber estimation, SIAM J. Sci. Comput.39, A1416 (2017)

    2017

  72. [72]

    Y. L. Daleckii and S. G. Krein, Integration and differenti- ation of functions of Hermitian operators and applications to the theory of perturbations, Am. Math. Soc. Transl. Ser. 247, 1 (1965)

    1965