pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.20971 · v1 · pith:P5ZS4X3Onew · submitted 2026-06-18 · 💻 cs.CV

UNITY: Attention Flow Networks for Adaptive Conditioning in Diffusion

Aryan Das , Koushik Biswas , Moloud Abdar , Vinay Kumar Verma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 17:31 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords diffusion modelscomposite conditioningattention flow networksadapter modulesimage generationmemory efficiencymultimodal conditioningtwo-stage training
0
0 comments X

The pith

UNITY uses a two-stage universal-to-specialized adapter to handle composite conditioning in diffusion models at constant complexity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a single adapter can jointly learn shared cross-modal semantics across conditioning types and then specialize without changing the base diffusion architecture. It does so by allocating half the training steps to a universal stage that builds general representations, followed by a specialization stage that refines modality-specific features. The Morphable Attention Flow networks and Morph Wrapper modules perform the adaptive alignment needed for this process. If the approach holds, models can switch between single and multiple conditions while using less memory and lower latency than training separate adapters for each modality. Readers would care because adding more conditioning signals currently forces either architectural changes or repeated training overhead.

Core claim

UNITY is a Universal-to-Specialized adapter that jointly learns shared semantics across multiple conditioning types in a Universal Stage using half the total training steps, then refines modality-specific features in a Specialization Stage, with Morphable Attention Flow (MAF) Network and Morph Wrapper modules providing channel-aware and spatially adaptive feature alignment through learnable flow fields and attention-based fusion, all at constant complexity to support single and composite conditioning while reducing inference latency and memory consumption.

What carries the argument

Morphable Attention Flow (MAF) Network and Morph Wrapper modules, which enable channel-aware and spatially adaptive feature alignment through learnable flow fields and attention-based fusion.

If this is right

  • The same trained adapter supports both single-modality and composite conditioning without architectural changes.
  • Inference runs at constant complexity, cutting latency and memory relative to multiple separate adapters.
  • State-of-the-art image fidelity is reached across multiple datasets under the two-stage budget split.
  • Specialization occurs after the universal stage without any modification to the base diffusion model.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The constant-complexity design could allow adding new conditioning modalities without retraining from scratch.
  • The two-stage split might transfer to other generative backbones that currently rely on modality-specific fine-tuning.
  • Lower memory footprint could make conditioned generation practical on hardware with tighter resource limits.

Load-bearing premise

A universal stage trained on half the total steps can capture effective cross-modal representations across all conditioning modalities that then allow successful specialization without modifying the underlying diffusion architecture.

What would settle it

An experiment that trains separate per-modality adapters on the same total step budget and shows they produce higher image fidelity or lower memory use than UNITY on composite conditioning tasks would falsify the central efficiency claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.20971 by Aryan Das, Koushik Biswas, Moloud Abdar, Vinay Kumar Verma.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Our results of composite conditioning image generating with UNITY-Adapter. arXiv:2606.20971v1 [cs.CV] 18 Jun 2026 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of FIDs and Infer time across methods. Conditional image generation has become a foundational capability in modern vi￾sual AI, yet as real-world applications in￾creasingly demand simultaneous control over structure, semantics, and style, the scalability of existing conditioning frame￾works has emerged as a critical and un￾solved bottleneck. Diffusion-based mod￾els [6, 25, 26] have enabled high-f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Proposed Framework: Conditioning inputs are processed through dual Spatial Encoders with Scaler Block to produce multi-scale feature pyramids F (1) and F (2). The Morphable Attention Flow (MAF) Network performs Cross-Modal alignment (Cross￾MSFE + Morph Wrapper), Self-Refinement (Self-MSFE + Morph Wrapper), and Fu￾sion (MSFE), with final features F f inal i conditioned via Cross-Attention with Text Embeddin… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Morph Wrapper: Adaptive feature warping using learned Morpho Fields ∆ and Attention-Weighted Aggregation across M sampling points. processes the concatenation of the original primary features and the cross-aligned embeddings: \mathbf {Z}^{self}_{i} = \textit {MSFE}_{self}\Big (\text {Concat}\big (\tilde {\mathbf {F}}^{(1)}_{i}, \mathbf {E}^{cross}_{i}\big )\Big ), (6) where Z self i captures self-consisten… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Qualitative results across conditions shows that UNITY consistently produces the most accurate and semantically aligned outputs. demonstrates UNITY’s superior concept fusion, integrating clock faces within bicycle wheels with clear visibility, whereas UniCon produces abstract forms, CtrLoRA generates poor detail clarity, ControlNet++ creates blurry outputs, Uni-ControlNet obscures features, T2I-Adapter add… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce UNITY, a Universal-to-Specialized adapter for efficient and scalable composite conditioning in diffusion based image generation. Unlike prior methods that train separate adapters for each conditioning modality, UNITY jointly learns shared semantics across multiple conditioning types and subsequently specializes without modifying the underlying architecture. The proposed two stage training paradigm consists of a Universal Stage that captures cross modal representations across all conditioning modalities using half of the total training steps, followed by a Specialization Stage that refines modality specific features using the remaining training budget. At the core of UNITY are the Morphable Attention Flow (MAF) Network and Morph Wrapper modules, which enable channel aware and spatially adaptive feature alignment through learnable flow fields and attention based fusion. This constant complexity formulation supports flexible operation under both single and composite conditioning settings while significantly reducing inference latency and memory consumption. Extensive experiments across multiple datasets demonstrate that UNITY achieves state of the art image fidelity while maintaining superior memory efficiency. Code: https://github.com/arya-domain/UNITY

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper introduces UNITY, a Universal-to-Specialized adapter for composite conditioning in diffusion models. It employs a two-stage training paradigm consisting of a Universal Stage (half the total training steps) that learns shared cross-modal representations via the Morphable Attention Flow (MAF) Network and Morph Wrapper modules, followed by a Specialization Stage that refines modality-specific features without altering the base diffusion architecture. The method is claimed to achieve constant complexity, support both single and composite conditioning, reduce inference latency and memory use, and attain state-of-the-art image fidelity across multiple datasets.

Significance. If the central claims hold, UNITY could offer a practical advance in scalable multi-modal diffusion by avoiding per-modality adapters and architecture modifications while preserving efficiency. The constant-complexity attention-flow formulation and two-stage paradigm address a real tension in composite conditioning. However, the manuscript provides no quantitative results, ablations, or derivations to substantiate these claims, so the potential significance cannot be assessed from the given text.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of state-of-the-art image fidelity and superior memory efficiency rest on 'extensive experiments across multiple datasets,' yet no tables, figures, quantitative metrics, error bars, or baseline comparisons are supplied. This absence is load-bearing because the performance assertions cannot be evaluated.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (two-stage paradigm): The assumption that a universal stage trained on half the total steps suffices to learn cross-modal representations that then enable successful specialization without architecture changes is stated without any supporting ablation, representation analysis, or stability test under composite conditioning. This directly underpins the constant-complexity claim and the 'without modifying the underlying diffusion architecture' assertion.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract: No equations, derivations, or complexity analysis are provided for the MAF Network, Morph Wrapper, learnable flow fields, or attention-based fusion that are said to deliver constant complexity. The absence prevents verification of the 'constant complexity formulation' that is central to the efficiency claims.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

Thank you for the constructive feedback. We agree that the current version of the manuscript does not include the supporting quantitative results, ablations, or derivations referenced in the abstract. We will revise the paper to incorporate these elements to substantiate the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claims of state-of-the-art image fidelity and superior memory efficiency rest on 'extensive experiments across multiple datasets,' yet no tables, figures, quantitative metrics, error bars, or baseline comparisons are supplied. This absence is load-bearing because the performance assertions cannot be evaluated.

    Authors: We acknowledge this point. The manuscript as submitted does not contain the experimental results, tables, or figures. In the revised version, we will add comprehensive experimental results including tables with quantitative metrics, comparisons to baselines, error bars where applicable, and figures demonstrating performance across datasets. This will allow proper evaluation of the claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (two-stage paradigm): The assumption that a universal stage trained on half the total steps suffices to learn cross-modal representations that then enable successful specialization without architecture changes is stated without any supporting ablation, representation analysis, or stability test under composite conditioning. This directly underpins the constant-complexity claim and the 'without modifying the underlying diffusion architecture' assertion.

    Authors: We agree that ablations and analyses are necessary to support the two-stage paradigm. We will include ablations on the universal and specialization stages, representation analyses (e.g., t-SNE or similarity metrics), and tests under composite conditioning to demonstrate stability and the validity of the approach without architecture modifications. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: No equations, derivations, or complexity analysis are provided for the MAF Network, Morph Wrapper, learnable flow fields, or attention-based fusion that are said to deliver constant complexity. The absence prevents verification of the 'constant complexity formulation' that is central to the efficiency claims.

    Authors: We will add the mathematical formulations, including equations for the MAF Network, Morph Wrapper, learnable flow fields, and attention-based fusion. Additionally, we will provide derivations and a complexity analysis (e.g., big-O notation for time and memory) to verify the constant complexity under single and composite conditioning. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method description contains no derivations or predictions that reduce to inputs

full rationale

The provided abstract and description introduce a two-stage training paradigm (universal stage on half the steps followed by specialization) and modules (MAF Network, Morph Wrapper) but supply no equations, quantitative derivations, fitted parameters, or self-citations that could be inspected for reduction by construction. No load-bearing claims are shown to equate to their own inputs, and the central claims rest on empirical results rather than any self-referential math or imported uniqueness theorems. This is the expected outcome when no derivation chain is present to analyze.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 2 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities can be identified from the provided text.

invented entities (2)
  • Morphable Attention Flow (MAF) Network no independent evidence
    purpose: Enable channel-aware and spatially adaptive feature alignment through learnable flow fields and attention-based fusion
    Introduced in the abstract as a core module; no independent evidence or external validation supplied.
  • Morph Wrapper no independent evidence
    purpose: Support the MAF network in feature alignment for composite conditioning
    Introduced in the abstract as a supporting module; no independent evidence supplied.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5703 in / 1286 out tokens · 34375 ms · 2026-06-26T17:31:20.661159+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

37 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Vision transformer adapter for dense predictions

    Chen, Z., Duan, Y., Wang, W., He, J., Lu, T., Dai, J., Qiao, Y.: Vision transformer adapter for dense predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08534 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  2. [2]

    NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimation

    Dinh,L.,Krueger,D.,Bengio,Y.:Nice:Non-linearindependentcomponents estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1410.8516 (2014)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  3. [3]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Un- terthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., et al.: An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. In: International Conference on Learning Representations

  4. [4]

    In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)

    Hessel, J., Holtzman, A., Forbes, M., Bras, R.L., Choi, Y.: Clipscore: A reference-free evaluation metric for image captioning. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). pp. 7514–7528 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS)

    Heusel, M., Ramsauer, H., Unterthiner, T., Nessler, B., Hochreiter, S.: Gans trained by a two time-scale update rule converge to a local nash equilib- rium. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS). pp. 6626–6637 (2017)

    2017

  6. [6]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    Ho, J., Jain, A., Abbeel, P.: Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 33, pp. 6840–6851 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Houlsby, N., Giurgiu, A., Jastrzebski, S., Morrone, B., Laroussilhe, Q.D., Gesmundo, A., Attariyan, M., Gelly, S.: Parameter-efficient transfer learn- ing for nlp. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 2790–

  8. [8]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04328 (2025)

    Hu, J., Zhou, X., Liu, Z.: Unicombine: Unified multi-conditional combi- nation with diffusion models for flexible image synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.04328 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Huang, L., Chen, D., Liu, Y., Yujun, S., Zhao, D., Jingren, Z.: Com- poser:Creativeandcontrollableimagesynthesiswithcomposableconditions (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XVI

    Huang, X., Mallya, A., Wang, T.C., Liu, M.Y.: Multimodal conditional image synthesis with product-of-experts gans. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th European Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part XVI. pp. 91–109. Springer (2022)

    2022

  11. [11]

    In: Cristea, A.I., Walker, E., Lu, Y., Santos, O.C., Isotani, S

    Li, M., Yang, T., Kuang, H., Wu, J., Wang, Z., Xiao, X., Chen, C.: Control- net++: Improving conditional controls with efficient consistency feedback. In:Computer Vision–ECCV 2024:18thEuropeanConference,Milan,Italy, September 29–October 4, 2024, Proceedings, Part VII. p. 129–147. Springer- Verlag,Berlin,Heidelberg(2024).https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031- ...

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-031- 2024

  12. [12]

    In: The Thir- teenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025)

    Li, X., Herrmann, C., Chan, K.C., Li, Y., Sun, D., Yang, M.H.: A simple approach to unifying diffusion-based conditional generation. In: The Thir- teenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025)

    2025

  13. [13]

    In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th Eu- ropean Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part IX

    Li, Y., Mao, H., Girshick, R., He, K.: Exploring plain vision transformer backbones for object detection. In: Computer Vision–ECCV 2022: 17th Eu- ropean Conference, Tel Aviv, Israel, October 23–27, 2022, Proceedings, Part IX. pp. 280–296. Springer (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV)

    Lin, T.Y., Maire, M., Belongie, S., Hays, J., Perona, P., Ramanan, D., Dollár, P., Zitnick, C.L.: Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In: European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV). pp. 740–755. Springer (2014)

    2014

  15. [15]

    In: Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2019)

    Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: Decoupled weight decay regularization. In: Inter- national Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01212 (2024)

    Mohamed, S.: Tcig: Two-stage controlled image generation with quality en- hancement through diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.01212 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    Mou, C., Wang, X., Xie, L., Wu, Y., Zhang, J., Qi, Z., Shan, Y.: T2i- adapter: learning adapters to dig out more controllable ability for text-to- image diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth AAAI Con- ference on Artificial Intelligence and Thirty-Sixth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Fourteenth Symposi...

    work page doi:10.1609/aaai.v38i5.28226 2024

  18. [18]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Ni, H., Shi, C., Li, K., Huang, S.X., Min, M.R.: Conditional image-to- video generation with latent flow diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 7451–7460 (2023)

    2023

  19. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Park, T., Liu, M.Y., Wang, T.C., Zhu, J.Y.: Semantic image synthesis with spatially-adaptive normalization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Con- ference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 2337–2346 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    Qin, C., Zhang, S., Yu, N., Feng, Y., Yang, X., Zhou, Y., Wang, H., Niebles, J.C., Xiong, C., Savarese, S., Ermon, S., Fu, Y., Xu, R.: Unicontrol: A unified diffusion model for controllable visual generation in the wild (2023), https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.11147

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    In: International Conference on Machine Learning

    Radford, A., Kim, J.W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sas- try, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al.: Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision. In: International Conference on Machine Learning. pp. 8748–8763 (2021)

    2021

  22. [22]

    Hierarchical Text-Conditional Image Generation with CLIP Latents

    Ramesh, A., Dhariwal, P., Nichol, A., Chu, C., Chen, M.: Hierarchi- cal text-conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  23. [23]

    In: International Confer- ence on Machine Learning

    Ramesh, A., Pavlov, M., Goh, G., Gray, S., Voss, C., Radford, A., Chen, M., Sutskever, I.: Zero-shot text-to-image generation. In: International Confer- ence on Machine Learning. pp. 8821–8831. PMLR (2021)

    2021

  24. [24]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF UNITY 17 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Ren, Y., Yu, X., Chen, J., Li, T.H., Li, G.: Deep image spatial transfor- mation for person image generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF UNITY 17 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 7690–7699 (2020)

    2020

  25. [25]

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models (2022),https: //arxiv.org/abs/2112.10752

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  26. [26]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Rombach, R., Blattmann, A., Lorenz, D., Esser, P., Ommer, B.: High- resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 10684–10695 (2022)

    2022

  27. [27]

    Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding

    Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E., Ghasemipour, S.K.S., Ayan, B.K., Mahdavi, S.S., Lopes, R.G., et al.: Photo- realistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11487 (2022)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2025)

    Shi, Y., Bortoli, V.D., Campbell, A., Doucet, A.: Diff2flow: Training flow matching models via diffusion bridges. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2025)

    2025

  29. [29]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2021), https://openreview.net/forum?id=PxTIG12RRHS

    Song,Y.,Sohl-Dickstein,J.,Kingma,D.P.,Kumar,A.,Ermon,S.,Poole,B.: Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) (2021), https://openreview.net/forum?id=PxTIG12RRHS

    2021

  30. [30]

    arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04356 (2023)

    Sun, Q., Wei, Z., Chen, J., Wang, Z., Zhang, J.: Multigen-20m: A large- scale multi-modal dataset for controllable image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.04356 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  31. [31]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision

    Tan, Z., Liu, S., Yang, X., Xue, Q., Wang, X.: Ominicontrol: Minimal and universal control for diffusion transformer. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 7832–7841 (2024)

    2024

  32. [32]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition

    Wang, T.C., Liu, M.Y., Zhu, J.Y., Tao, A., Kautz, J., Catanzaro, B.: High- resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 8798–8807 (2018)

    2018

  33. [33]

    In: European Conference on Computer Vision

    Wei, Y., Liu, M., Wang, H., Zhu, R., Hu, G., Zuo, W.: Learning flow- based feature warping for face frontalization with illumination inconsistent supervision. In: European Conference on Computer Vision. pp. 558–574. Springer (2020)

    2020

  34. [34]

    In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025),https:// openreview.net/forum?id=3Gga05Jdmj

    Xu, Y., He, Z., Shan, S., Chen, X.: CtrloRA: An extensible and effi- cient framework for controllable image generation. In: The Thirteenth International Conference on Learning Representations (2025),https:// openreview.net/forum?id=3Gga05Jdmj

    2025

  35. [35]

    In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2023)

    Zhang, L., Rao, A., Agrawala, M.: Adding conditional control to text-to- image diffusion models. In: IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) (2023)

    2023

  36. [36]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems

    Zhang, Q., Chen, Y.: Diffusion normalizing flow. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. vol. 34, pp. 16280–16291 (2021)

    2021

  37. [37]

    Das et al

    Zhao, S., Chen, D., Chen, Y.C., Bao, J., Hao, S., Yuan, L., Wong, K.Y.K.: Uni-controlnet:All-in-onecontroltotext-to-imagediffusionmodels.In:Pro- 18 A. Das et al. ceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. pp. 11127–11137 (2024) UNITY 19 Supplementary Material 1 Training and Evaluation Weevaluatetwoconfigurations:UNITY ...

    2024