Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 2 minor 75 references

Urban Power Grid Topology and Hierarchy Identification from Open Data

T0 review · 2 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Open data fused with graph algorithms and machine learning reconstructs complete urban power grid topology down to individual building connections.

desk verdict The paper outlines a pipeline to reconstruct urban grid topology from open data but provides no validation that the low-voltage inferences match actual connections. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.21352 v1 pith:P7POR66L submitted 2026-06-19 cs.LG

Shiliang Zhang , Sabita Maharjan This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.LG
keywords urbanpowergridtopologyidentificationopendatagraphalgorithmsgeospatialmachinelearninglow-voltagedistributionsystemanalysisOslo
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents a framework that assembles public records of power lines, substations, transformers and poles into the high- and medium-voltage skeleton of an urban grid using graph algorithms. It then clusters OpenStreetMap building footprints with geospatial machine learning to infer the low-voltage lines that connect those buildings to the nearest transformers. When applied to the Alna district of Oslo the method produces a single connected topology that includes every major asset and all 7,330 buildings. The resulting map removes the need for proprietary utility data when researchers want to run power-flow studies, failure simulations or renewable-integration analyses at city scale.

What carries the argument

The open-data-driven framework that fuses public power infrastructure records with graph algorithms for the high- and medium-voltage network and geospatial machine learning on building footprints to infer low-voltage connections.

What would settle it

A side-by-side comparison of the reconstructed Alna topology against the actual utility low-voltage line records or field verification of building connections would show whether the inferred links match reality.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By fusing public infrastructure data with graph-based algorithms to trace the high- and medium-voltage skeleton and then applying geospatial machine learning to OpenStreetMap building data to group demand clusters and infer the final distribution lines, the framework reconstructs the complete grid topology that connects 7,330 buildings and all major electricity infrastructure assets in the Alna district of Oslo.

Load-bearing premise

Public infrastructure records and OpenStreetMap building data, processed by the chosen graph and machine-learning steps, correctly capture the actual physical layout of the low-voltage distribution lines.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Power-flow optimization and cascading-failure simulation become possible using only open data.
  • Grid-resilience studies against rising distributed renewable generation can be performed at the building level.
  • The same data-fusion steps can be repeated in any city where comparable public infrastructure and building records exist.
  • Last-mile network analysis no longer requires access to closed utility datasets.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the method generalizes, researchers could generate comparable maps for many cities and compare resilience metrics across different grid designs.
  • Combining the static topology with real-time sensor data could support dynamic load-balancing or outage-response models.
  • Errors in the low-voltage inference step would propagate directly into any downstream power-flow or reliability calculation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes an open-data-driven framework to reconstruct the full hierarchy and topology of an urban power grid, from high-voltage transmission lines down to individual building service connections. Public infrastructure records (power lines, substations, transformers, poles) are fused via graph algorithms to recover the HV/MV skeleton; geospatial machine learning on OpenStreetMap building footprints is then used to form demand clusters whose low-voltage connections are inferred by proximity and graph-completion rules. The method is demonstrated on the Alna district of Oslo, where it produces a topology said to connect all 7,330 buildings and major assets.

Significance. A validated version of the framework would supply a practical, reproducible route to grid models for power-flow studies, cascading-failure analysis, and renewable-integration planning in jurisdictions where detailed utility data remain proprietary. The open-data emphasis and explicit handling of the last-mile LV layer address a recognized gap in the literature.

major comments (2)
  1. [Application to Alna] Application section (Alna case study): the central claim that the procedure yields the “complete grid topology” connecting 7,330 buildings rests on an unvalidated inference step for low-voltage service drops. No held-out utility records, precision/recall figures, or comparison against known connection points are reported, so it is impossible to determine whether the cluster-to-asset assignments recover physical wiring.
  2. [Methods] Methods (geospatial ML clustering and topology inference): the rules used to assign clusters to transformers or poles (proximity, demand aggregation, graph completion) are load-bearing for the LV topology yet receive no sensitivity analysis or cross-validation against even a small set of verified connections. Without such checks the output remains an untested hypothesis rather than a verified mapping.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract and introduction should explicitly flag that the HV/MV skeleton is directly observable from public records while the LV layer is inferred, so readers immediately understand the differing levels of certainty.
  2. [Results] Figure captions and the Alna results section would benefit from a clear statement of the number of clusters formed, the distance threshold employed, and any post-processing rules applied to produce the final graph.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback and for recognizing the potential value of the open-data framework. We address each major comment below, agreeing where revisions are needed to clarify limitations while noting inherent constraints from data availability.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Application to Alna] Application section (Alna case study): the central claim that the procedure yields the “complete grid topology” connecting 7,330 buildings rests on an unvalidated inference step for low-voltage service drops. No held-out utility records, precision/recall figures, or comparison against known connection points are reported, so it is impossible to determine whether the cluster-to-asset assignments recover physical wiring.

    Authors: We agree that the LV topology is inferred via proximity and graph rules without direct validation against utility records. This limitation stems from the proprietary nature of detailed connection data, which the framework aims to circumvent. We will revise the manuscript to qualify the claim as an 'inferred topology' rather than 'complete,' add a limitations subsection on the inference assumptions, and discuss why quantitative metrics like precision/recall cannot be computed. No ground-truth data is available for comparison. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Methods] Methods (geospatial ML clustering and topology inference): the rules used to assign clusters to transformers or poles (proximity, demand aggregation, graph completion) are load-bearing for the LV topology yet receive no sensitivity analysis or cross-validation against even a small set of verified connections. Without such checks the output remains an untested hypothesis rather than a verified mapping.

    Authors: We will add a sensitivity analysis subsection to the Methods, varying key parameters such as proximity thresholds and demand aggregation criteria, and report effects on topology outputs (e.g., connection counts and cluster statistics). This addresses the lack of robustness checks. Cross-validation against verified connections remains impossible without proprietary data. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Quantitative validation metrics (precision/recall or held-out comparisons) for the low-voltage inferences, as these require proprietary utility records unavailable for the Alna district.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; topology reconstruction is a data-driven pipeline from external open sources

full rationale

The paper presents a framework that fuses public infrastructure records with OpenStreetMap building footprints, applies graph algorithms for HV/MV skeleton mapping, and uses geospatial ML for LV cluster inference and line topology. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are described that would make any output equivalent to its inputs by construction. The central claim rests on processing external data rather than any self-definitional or fitted-input reduction. This matches the default case of a self-contained empirical pipeline with no load-bearing circular steps.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the framework description does not detail any fitted constants or new postulated objects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Urban Power Grid Topology and Hierarchy Identification from Open Data." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P7POR66L

@misc{pith2026260621352,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Urban Power Grid Topology and Hierarchy Identification from Open Data},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P7POR66L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.21352}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding the complex topology and hierarchy of urban power grid is crucial for energy prognosis, power flow management, and system resilience analysis. However, detailed grid information remains largely proprietary. This creates significant barriers for research and innovation, especially when analyzing the last-mile distribution networks connecting individual buildings. This paper addresses this challenge by developing an open-data-driven framework for the complete identification of urban power grid topology, from high-voltage transmission down to individual building connections. Particularly, we fuse public infrastructure data (power-lines, substations, transformers, poles) to map the high and medium-voltage skeleton using graph-based algorithms. We then leverage geospatial machine learning on OpenStreetMap building data to group power demand clusters, and infer the physical topology of the final distribution lines linking the clustered buildings. We apply the developed framework to the district of Alna in Oslo, Norway, and we reconstruct the complete grid topology that connects 7,330 buildings and all major electricity infrastructure assets. With the research in this work, we provide a critical tool that facilitates power system analysis, e.g., power flow optimization, cascading failure simulation, and grid resilience against the penetration of distributed renewable generation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.21352 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Overview of the workflow for our urban power grid identification. (a) presents the data from OpenStreetMap including power line geometries, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An example of data sources from OSM (upper) and utility data released [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. An example of connecting an asset with a power line. The green line [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: An example of the distribution of utility poles (red dots). The blue [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: This ensures that the clustering and subsequent grid [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: An example of land-use types retrieved from OSM. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: An example of building footprints (in blue polygons) retrieved from [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Land-use of different types in the area of Alan, Oslo. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: All the power grids GIS information integrated from OpenStreetMap [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_10.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Building footprints and road networks in Alna. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Identified last-mile power line connections between buildings (in red [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Overview of the identified power grids from the skeleton grid down to the last miles. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: The simplified view of identified power grid for Alna, where we [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Frequency response of the identified power grid. We increase the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_14.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Resilient power grid for smart city.iEnergy, 1(3):325–340, 2022

    Yonghua Song, Can Wan, Xuejun Hu, Hongpei Qin, and Kengweng Lao. Resilient power grid for smart city.iEnergy, 1(3):325–340, 2022

    2022

  2. [2]

    Peng, Chen-Ching Liu, Yuan Li, Akshay Kumar Jain, and Dmitri Vinnikov

    Fang Z. Peng, Chen-Ching Liu, Yuan Li, Akshay Kumar Jain, and Dmitri Vinnikov. Envisioning the future renewable and resilient energy grids—A power grid revolution enabled by renewables, energy storage, and energy electronics.IEEE Journal of Emerging and Selected Topics in Industrial Electronics, 5(1):8–26, 2024

    2024

  3. [3]

    Ultra-short-term solar power forecasting by deep learning and data reconstruction.Solar Energy, 315:114749, 2026

    Jinbao Wang, Jun Liu, Xuehui Ma, Shiliang Zhang, Chenhui Yang, and Bairen An. Ultra-short-term solar power forecasting by deep learning and data reconstruction.Solar Energy, 315:114749, 2026

    2026

  4. [4]

    Ex- ploring the interpretability of forecasting models for energy balancing market.Artificial Intelligence Science and Engineering, 1(4):295–306, 2025

    Oskar V ˚ale, Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan, and Gro Klæboe. Ex- ploring the interpretability of forecasting models for energy balancing market.Artificial Intelligence Science and Engineering, 1(4):295–306, 2025

    2025

  5. [5]

    Advancing resilient power systems through hierarchical restoration with renewable resources.Scientific Reports, 15(1):29755, 2025

    Mohannad Alhazmi and Peijin Li. Advancing resilient power systems through hierarchical restoration with renewable resources.Scientific Reports, 15(1):29755, 2025

    2025

  6. [6]

    Malluhi, and Ab- dulla K

    Emran Altamimi, Abdulaziz Al-Ali, Qutaibah M. Malluhi, and Ab- dulla K. Al-Ali. Smart grid public datasets: Characteristics and as- sociated applications.IET Smart Grid, 7(5):503–530, 2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Increasing the resilience of the texas power grid against extreme storms by hardening critical lines.Nature Energy, 9(5):526–535, 2024

    Julian St ¨urmer, Anton Plietzsch, Thomas V ogt, Frank Hellmann, J¨urgen Kurths, Christian Otto, Katja Frieler, and Mehrnaz Anvari. Increasing the resilience of the texas power grid against extreme storms by hardening critical lines.Nature Energy, 9(5):526–535, 2024

    2024

  8. [8]

    Cardenas, and Avishai Wool

    Neil Ortiz, Alvaro A. Cardenas, and Avishai Wool. SCADA world: An exploration of the diversity in power grid networks.Proceedings of the ACM on Measurement and Analysis of Computing Systems, 8(1), 2024

    2024

Show all 75 references
  1. [9]

    Open power system datasets and open simulation engines: A survey toward machine learning applications.IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy, 12:353– 365, 2025

    Ignacio Aravena, Chih-Che Sun, Ranyu Shi, Subir Majumder, Weihang Yan, Jhi-Young Joo, Le Xie, and Jiyu Wang. Open power system datasets and open simulation engines: A survey toward machine learning applications.IEEE Open Access Journal of Power and Energy, 12:353– 365, 2025

    2025

  2. [10]

    Modelling the high-voltage grid using open data for Europe and beyond.Scientific Data, 12(1):277, 2025

    Bobby Xiong, Davide Fioriti, Fabian Neumann, Iegor Riepin, and Tom Brown. Modelling the high-voltage grid using open data for Europe and beyond.Scientific Data, 12(1):277, 2025. 11

    2025

  3. [11]

    Static state estimation without topology processor.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(5):4712–4722, 2021

    Bilgehan Donmez and Ali Abur. Static state estimation without topology processor.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 36(5):4712–4722, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    Yijun Xu, Jaber Valinejad, Mert Korkali, Lamine Mili, Yajun Wang, Xiao Chen, and Zongsheng Zheng. An adaptive-importance-sampling- enhanced Bayesian approach for topology estimation in an unbalanced power distribution system.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 37(3):2220–2232, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    Centrally coordinated multi-agent reinforcement learning for power grid topology control

    Barbera de Mol, Davide Barbieri, Jan Viebahn, and Davide Grossi. Centrally coordinated multi-agent reinforcement learning for power grid topology control. InProceedings of the 16th ACM International Conference on Future and Sustainable Energy Systems, E-Energy ’25, page 460–47...

    2025

  6. [14]

    The impact of integration of renewable energy on imbalance settlement: Resilience analysis

    Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan, Raul Shahi, and Xuehui Ma. The impact of integration of renewable energy on imbalance settlement: Resilience analysis. In2024 IEEE International Conference on Com- munications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm)...

    2024

  7. [15]

    La Porta

    Sina Gharebaghi, Nilanjan Ray Chaudhuri, Ting He, and Thomas F. La Porta. Dynamic modeling and mitigation of cascading failures in power grids with interdependent cyber and physical layers.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 15(3):3235–3247, 2024

    2024

  8. [16]

    A failure tree model for cascading failure in power grid with uncertain renewable energy generation.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22:4092–4108, 2025

    Yujie Yang, Yadong Zhou, Jiang Wu, Zhanbo Xu, Sizhe He, Ting Liu, and Xiaohong Guan. A failure tree model for cascading failure in power grid with uncertain renewable energy generation.IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 22:4092–4108, 2025

    2025

  9. [17]

    Cascading failure propagation and mitigation strategies in power systems.IEEE Systems Journal, 17(2):3282–3293, 2023

    Meixuan Jade Li, Chi Kong Tse, Dong Liu, and Xi Zhang. Cascading failure propagation and mitigation strategies in power systems.IEEE Systems Journal, 17(2):3282–3293, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Birk Jones, William Vining, Matthew Lave, Thad Haines, Christopher Neuman, Jesse Bennett, and Don R

    C. Birk Jones, William Vining, Matthew Lave, Thad Haines, Christopher Neuman, Jesse Bennett, and Don R. Scoffield. Impact of electric vehicle customer response to time-of-use rates on distribution power grids. Energy Reports, 8:8225–8235, 2022

    2022

  11. [19]

    Adaptive robust load restoration via coordinating distribution network reconfiguration and mobile energy storage.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 15(6):5485–5499, 2024

    Ruipeng Xu, Cuo Zhang, Daming Zhang, Zhao Yang Dong, and Chris- tine Yip. Adaptive robust load restoration via coordinating distribution network reconfiguration and mobile energy storage.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 15(6):5485–5499, 2024

    2024

  12. [20]

    Lokesh Vankudoth and Altaf Q.H. Badar. Development and analysis of scheduling strategies for utilizing shared energy storage system in networked microgrids.Journal of Energy Storage, 97:112691, 2024

    2024

  13. [21]

    Ca˜nizares, Thomas Leibfried, and Kankar Bhattacharya

    Steven de Jongh, Felicitas Mueller, Fabian Osterberg, Claudio A. Ca˜nizares, Thomas Leibfried, and Kankar Bhattacharya. Data-driven topology and parameter identification in distribution systems with lim- ited measurements.IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, 40(1):249– 260, 2025

    2025

  14. [22]

    Adaptive topology identification with dynamic update mechanisms for flexible interconnected distribution networks.Electric Power Systems Research, 245:111649, 2025

    Yixuan Li, Li Ma, Wei Pei, Hao Xiao, and Guoju Zhang. Adaptive topology identification with dynamic update mechanisms for flexible interconnected distribution networks.Electric Power Systems Research, 245:111649, 2025

    2025

  15. [23]

    Grid topology identification via distributed statistical hypothesis testing

    Saverio Bolognani and Keith Moffat. Grid topology identification via distributed statistical hypothesis testing. In Reza Arghandeh and Yuxun Zhou, editors,Big Data Application in Power Systems (Second Edition), pages 109–134. Elsevier Science, second edition edition, 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Transformer-customer relationship identification based on deep gaussian mixture model in low-voltage distribution system.Electric Power Systems Research, 234:110591, 2024

    Li Huang, Gan Zhou, Ying Zeng, Jian Zhang, and Yanjun Feng. Transformer-customer relationship identification based on deep gaussian mixture model in low-voltage distribution system.Electric Power Systems Research, 234:110591, 2024

    2024

  17. [25]

    Improved topology identification for distribution network with relatively balanced power supplies.IET Energy Systems Integration, 6(2):162–173, 2024

    Wenpeng Luan, Da Xu, Bo Liu, Wenqian Jiang, Li Feng, and Wenbin Liu. Improved topology identification for distribution network with relatively balanced power supplies.IET Energy Systems Integration, 6(2):162–173, 2024

    2024

  18. [26]

    Shadman Abid, and Mohammed Al-Abri

    Razzaqul Ahshan, Md. Shadman Abid, and Mohammed Al-Abri. Geospatial mapping of large-scale electric power grids: A residual graph convolutional network-based approach with attention mechanism. Energy and AI, 20:100486, 2025

    2025

  19. [27]

    Topology identification in low-voltage grids using neural networks

    Franziska Tischbein, Antoni Chajan, Luis B ¨ottcher, and Andreas Ulbig. Topology identification in low-voltage grids using neural networks. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Control, and Computing Technologies for Smart Grids (SmartGridComm), pages 568– ...

    2024

  20. [28]

    Nan Feng, Yaping Du, and Yuxuan Ding. A heuristic-search-based topology identification and parameter estimation method in low voltage distribution grids with low observability.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 15(6):5826–5839, 2024

    2024

  21. [29]

    Liu, Luis F

    Eshan Karunarathne, Michael Z. Liu, Luis F. Ochoa, and Tansu Alpcan. Using real smart meter data to construct three-phase low voltage network models.IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 40(3):2465–2477, 2025

    2025

  22. [30]

    Lei Zhu, Shutan Wu, Qi Wang, and Yang Li. Progressive identification of distribution network topology based on user-side Internet of Things device measurement data.IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 19(1):e70064, 2025

    2025

  23. [31]

    Zhiqi Xu, Wei Jiang, Junjun Xu, Lei Wu, Minghua Wang, Jinming Chen, Ye Chen, and Junbo Zhao. Distribution network topology identification using smart meter data and considering the same-bus-different-feeder condition.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(8):8600– 8613, 2023

    2023

  24. [32]

    Li Guo, Ge Yang, Yixin Liu, Yuxuan Zhang, Zhongguan Wang, Haifeng Yu, Yifei Wang, and Chengshan Wang. Topology and parameter iden- tification of three-phase low-voltage distribution network and voltage control strategy based on user smart meter measurements: A data-driven appr...

    2025

  25. [33]

    Mauricio, and Esther Romero-Ramos

    ´Alvaro Rodr´ıguez del Nozal, Rub´en Carmona-Pardo, Juan M. Mauricio, and Esther Romero-Ramos. An evolutionary computational approach for the identification of distribution networks models.Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 137:109184, 2024

    2024

  26. [34]

    An edge computing-based lightweight topology identification method for low voltage power distribution net- works

    Hao Yang, Lei Yu, Xinhao Lin, Yinliang Liu, Xian Qiao, Haidian Li, Bowen Dong, and Tianyu Chen. An edge computing-based lightweight topology identification method for low voltage power distribution net- works. InInternational Conference on Smart Electrical Grid and Re- newable...

    2024

  27. [35]

    Liang Li, Jian Zhao, Xiaoyu Wang, Zhao Xu, and Yinjie Zhu. Transformer-customer connectivity relationship identification for low- voltage distribution system with high penetration of household pv systems.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 16(1):356–368, 2025

    2025

  28. [36]

    Topology identification technology for low-voltage distributed photovoltaic distribution network lines

    Guoquan Zheng, Enguo Zhu, Hailong Zhang, Yan Liu, Junlong Wang, and Zhe Liu. Topology identification technology for low-voltage distributed photovoltaic distribution network lines. In2024 3rd Interna- tional Conference on Energy and Electrical Power Systems (ICEEPS), pages 202...

    2024

  29. [37]

    Automatic grid topology detection method based on lasso algorithm and t-SNE algorithm.Energy Informatics, 7(1):44, 2024

    Sheng Huang, Huakun Que, Yingnan Zhang, Tenglong Xie, and Jie Peng. Automatic grid topology detection method based on lasso algorithm and t-SNE algorithm.Energy Informatics, 7(1):44, 2024

    2024

  30. [38]

    Mora-Merch ´an, Alejandro Car- rasco, Enrique Personal, and Carlos Le ´on

    Sebasti ´an Garc ´ıa, Matteo Fresia, J.M. Mora-Merch ´an, Alejandro Car- rasco, Enrique Personal, and Carlos Le ´on. A data-driven topology identification method for low-voltage distribution networks based on the wavelet transform.Electric Power Systems Research, 243:111517, 2025

    2025

  31. [39]

    A two-step method for topology identification and hidden nodes detec- tion in distribution networks

    H ´el`ene Ponsaerts, Reinhilde D’hulst, Marta Vanin, and Dirk Van Hertem. A two-step method for topology identification and hidden nodes detec- tion in distribution networks. In2025 IEEE Kiel PowerTech, pages 1–6, 2025

    2025

  32. [40]

    A data-driven topology identification method for low-voltage distribution network

    Shuo Shi, Xiaoqing Han, Tingjun Li, Hao Zhang, and Hongbo Yan. A data-driven topology identification method for low-voltage distribution network. In2024 3rd International Conference on Power Systems and Electrical Technology (PSET), pages 522–526, 2024

    2024

  33. [41]

    Influence of measurement uncertainties on the quality of grid topology identification in three-phase systems

    Franziska Tischbein, Dominik Kubon, Markus Stroot, and Andreas Ulbig. Influence of measurement uncertainties on the quality of grid topology identification in three-phase systems. In2024 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE), pages 1–6, 2024

    2024

  34. [42]

    Ca ˜nizares, Thomas Leibfried, and Kankar Bhattacharya

    Steven de Jongh, Felicitas Mueller, Claudio A. Ca ˜nizares, Thomas Leibfried, and Kankar Bhattacharya. Topology and parameter identi- fication in electrical distribution systems using spatial priors. In2024 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT EUROPE), page...

    2024

  35. [43]

    Topology and pa- rameter identification of distribution network using smart meter and µPMU measurements.IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71:1–14, 2022

    Vedantham Lakshmi Srinivas and Jianzhong Wu. Topology and pa- rameter identification of distribution network using smart meter and µPMU measurements.IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 71:1–14, 2022

    2022

  36. [44]

    Real-time identifiability of power distribution network topologies with limited monitoring.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 4(2):325–330, 2020

    Guido Cavraro, Andrey Bernstein, Vassilis Kekatos, and Yingchen Zhang. Real-time identifiability of power distribution network topologies with limited monitoring.IEEE Control Systems Letters, 4(2):325–330, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    Real-time topology estimation for active distribution system using graph-bank tracking Bayesian networks.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(4):6127–6137, 2023

    Youbo Liu, Pengzhe Ren, Junbo Zhao, Tingjian Liu, Zeqi Wang, Zao Tang, and Junyong Liu. Real-time topology estimation for active distribution system using graph-bank tracking Bayesian networks.IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 19(4):6127–6137, 2023

    2023

  38. [46]

    Low-voltage distribution grid topology identification with latent tree model.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13(3):2158–2169, 2022

    Haipeng Zhang, Jian Zhao, Xiaoyu Wang, and Yi Xuan. Low-voltage distribution grid topology identification with latent tree model.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13(3):2158–2169, 2022. 12

    2022

  39. [47]

    Abu Bakr Pengwah, Luxin Fang, Reza Razzaghi, and Lachlan L. H. Andrew. Topology identification of radial distribution networks using smart meter data.IEEE Systems Journal, 16(4):5708–5719, 2022

    2022

  40. [48]

    Joint topology identification and state estimation in unobservable distribution grids

    Hazhar Sufi Karimi and Balasubramaniam Natarajan. Joint topology identification and state estimation in unobservable distribution grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 12(6):5299–5309, 2021

    2021

  41. [49]

    A method for determining the topology of multiple low-voltage radial distribution grids

    Chijun Zhang and Franziska Tischbein. A method for determining the topology of multiple low-voltage radial distribution grids. In2024 IEEE 12th International Conference on Smart Energy Grid Engineering (SEGE), pages 90–96, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Data sharing, privacy and security considerations in the energy sector: A review from technical landscape to regulatory specifications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03539, 2025

    Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan, Lee Andrew Bygrave, and Shui Yu. Data sharing, privacy and security considerations in the energy sector: A review from technical landscape to regulatory specifications.arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.03539, 2025

    2025

  43. [51]

    Privacy-preserving transactive energy systems: Key topics and open research challenges

    Daniel Gerbi Duguma, Juliana Zhang, Meysam Aboutalebi, Shiliang Zhang, Catherine Banet, Cato Bjørkli, Chinmayi Baramashetru, Frank Eliassen, Hui Zhang, Jonathan Muringani, et al. Privacy-preserving transactive energy systems: Key topics and open research challenges. arXiv prep...

    2023

  44. [52]

    Evaluation of open-source tools for differential privacy.Sensors, 23(14):6509, 2023

    Shiliang Zhang, Anton Hagermalm, Sanjin Slavnic, Elad Michael Schiller, and Magnus Almgren. Evaluation of open-source tools for differential privacy.Sensors, 23(14):6509, 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Practical problems before privacy concerns: How European energy community initiatives struggle with data collection.Energy Research & Social Science, 98:103040, 2023

    Shary Heuninckx, Maarja Meitern, Geert te Boveldt, and Thierry Coose- mans. Practical problems before privacy concerns: How European energy community initiatives struggle with data collection.Energy Research & Social Science, 98:103040, 2023

    2023

  46. [54]

    Security, privacy, and agentic ai in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18914, 2026

    Shiliang Zhang and Sabita Maharjan. Security, privacy, and agentic ai in a regulatory view: From definitions and distinctions to provisions and reflections.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.18914, 2026

    2026

  47. [55]

    Descriptor: Norwegian electricity in geographic dataset (noregeo).IEEE Data Descriptions, 3:82–92, 2026

    Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan, Kai Strunz, and Jan Christian Bryne. Descriptor: Norwegian electricity in geographic dataset (noregeo).IEEE Data Descriptions, 3:82–92, 2026

    2026

  48. [56]

    Reference dataset for semi- urban and rural Norwegian low voltage distribution grids.Data in Brief, 59:111453, 2025

    Lill Mari Engan, Stine Ekrheim, Sigurd Bjarghov, Jonatan Ralf Axel Klemets, Ivan Schytte, and Gerd Kjølle. Reference dataset for semi- urban and rural Norwegian low voltage distribution grids.Data in Brief, 59:111453, 2025

    2025

  49. [57]

    Ai and open-data driven scalable solar power profiling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.02738, 2026

    Shiliang Zhang, Sabita Maharjan, and Damla Turgut. Ai and open-data driven scalable solar power profiling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.02738, 2026

    2026 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Powergraph: A power grid benchmark dataset for graph neural networks

    Anna Varbella, Kenza Amara, Blazhe Gjorgiev, Mennatallah El-Assady, and Giovanni Sansavini. Powergraph: A power grid benchmark dataset for graph neural networks. InAdvances in Neural Information Process- ing Systems, volume 37, pages 110784–110804. Curran Associates, Inc., 2024

    2024

  51. [59]

    Extended vehicle energy dataset (eved): an enhanced large- scale dataset for deep learning on vehicle trip energy consumption.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08630, 2022

    Shiliang Zhang, Dyako Fatih, Fahmi Abdulqadir, Tobias Schwarz, and Xuehui Ma. Extended vehicle energy dataset (eved): an enhanced large- scale dataset for deep learning on vehicle trip energy consumption.arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08630, 2022

    2022

  52. [60]

    de Arruda, Sandro M Reia, Shiyang Ruan, Kuldip S Atwal, Hamdi Kavak, Taylor Anderson, and Dieter Pfoser

    Henrique F. de Arruda, Sandro M Reia, Shiyang Ruan, Kuldip S Atwal, Hamdi Kavak, Taylor Anderson, and Dieter Pfoser. An OpenStreetMap derived building classification dataset for the United States.Scientific Data, 11(1):1210, 2024

    2024

  53. [61]

    Cenergy3: An open software package for city energy 3d modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20361, 2026

    Shiliang Zhang and Sabita Maharjan. Cenergy3: An open software package for city energy 3d modeling.arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20361, 2026

    2026

  54. [62]

    Graph theory applications for advanced geospa- tial modelling and decision-making.Applied Geomatics, 16(4):799–812, 2024

    Surajit Ghosh, Archita Mallick, Anuva Chowdhury, Kounik De Sarkar, and Jayesh Mukherjee. Graph theory applications for advanced geospa- tial modelling and decision-making.Applied Geomatics, 16(4):799–812, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    Extended vehicle energy dataset (eved): An enhanced large- scale dataset for vehicle energy consumption analysis

    Shiliang Zhang, Dyako Fatih, Fahmi Abdulqadir, Tobias Schwarz, and Xuehui Ma. Extended vehicle energy dataset (eved): An enhanced large- scale dataset for vehicle energy consumption analysis. In2025 IEEE 101st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2025-Spring), pages 01–

  56. [64]

    C ¸ akmak, and Veit Hagenmeyer

    Moritz Weber, Luc Janecke, H ¨useyin K. C ¸ akmak, and Veit Hagenmeyer. Open data-driven automation of residential distribution grid modeling with minimal data requirements.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 15(6):5721–5732, 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    Giraldo, Peter Palensky, and Pedro P

    Dong Liu, Juan S. Giraldo, Peter Palensky, and Pedro P. Vergara. Topology identification and parameters estimation of LV distribution networks using open gis data.International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 164:110395, 2025

    2025

  58. [66]

    Generation of low-voltage synthetic grid data for energy system modeling with the pylovo tool.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 41:101617, 2025

    Beneharo Reveron Baecker, Soner Candas, Deniz Tepe, and Anurag Mohapatra. Generation of low-voltage synthetic grid data for energy system modeling with the pylovo tool.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 41:101617, 2025

    2025

  59. [67]

    An open data-based model for generating a synthetic low-voltage grid to estimate hosting capacity.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 39:101483, 2024

    Therese Lundblad, Maria Taljegard, Niclas Mattsson, Elias Hartvigsson, and Filip Johnsson. An open data-based model for generating a synthetic low-voltage grid to estimate hosting capacity.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 39:101483, 2024

    2024

  60. [68]

    Large-scale generation of geo-referenced power distribution grids from open data with load clustering.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 42:101678, 2025

    Alfredo Oneto, Blazhe Gjorgiev, Filippo Tettamanti, and Giovanni Sansavini. Large-scale generation of geo-referenced power distribution grids from open data with load clustering.Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 42:101678, 2025

    2025

  61. [69]

    Geospatial map- ping of distribution grid with machine learning and publicly-accessible multi-modal data.Nature Communications, 14(1):5006, 2023

    Zhecheng Wang, Arun Majumdar, and Ram Rajagopal. Geospatial map- ping of distribution grid with machine learning and publicly-accessible multi-modal data.Nature Communications, 14(1):5006, 2023

    2023

  62. [70]

    Nisrine Kebir, Aniq Ahsan, Malcolm McCulloch, and Daniel J. Rogers. Modified minimum spanning tree for optimised DC microgrid cabling design.IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13(4):2523–2532, 2022

    2022

  63. [71]

    Comparative study of various approaches of dijkstra algorithm

    Divyam Verma, Devansh Messon, Mayank Rastogi, and Amit Singh. Comparative study of various approaches of dijkstra algorithm. In2021 International Conference on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (ICCCIS), pages 328–336, 2021

    2021

  64. [72]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022

    Matthias Fuchs and Wolfram H ¨opken.Clustering: Hierarchical, k- Means, DBSCAN, pages 129–149. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2022

    2022

  65. [73]

    Sequential outlier criterion for sparsification of online adaptive filter- ing.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(11):5277–5291, 2018

    Shiliang Zhang, Hui Cao, Shuo Yang, Yanbin Zhang, and Xiali Hei. Sequential outlier criterion for sparsification of online adaptive filter- ing.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 29(11):5277–5291, 2018

    2018

  66. [74]

    Adaptive dual control with online outlier detection for uncertain systems.ISA transactions, 129:157–168, 2022

    Xuehui Ma, Fucai Qian, Shiliang Zhang, Li Wu, and Lei Liu. Adaptive dual control with online outlier detection for uncertain systems.ISA transactions, 129:157–168, 2022

    2022

  67. [75]

    An outlier detection scheme for dynamical sequential datasets.Commu- nications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 48(5):1450–1502, 2019

    Shiliang Zhang, Hui Cao, Zonglin Ye, Yanbin Zhang, and Xiali Hei. An outlier detection scheme for dynamical sequential datasets.Commu- nications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation, 48(5):1450–1502, 2019

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.