pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22111 · v1 · pith:GPC6Y3RLnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.soft

On the statistical theory of strong electrolytes and high-temperature plasmas: new applications of the work of Yukhnovskii and Kelbg

W. Ebeling , M. Holovko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.soft
keywords strong electrolyteshigh-temperature plasmasCoulomb systemsexponential interaction modeloscillating correlationsOnsager boundcharge asymmetryYukhnovskii-Kelbg theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

Strong electrolytes and high-temperature plasmas share Coulomb structures governed by e^4 and e^6 contributions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies the statistical methods of Yukhnovskii and Kelbg to strong electrolytes and plasmas above 10^5 K through an exponential interaction model. It establishes that the physics of these two classes of Coulomb systems is determined mostly by terms proportional to e^4 and e^6. At higher densities both systems are predicted to undergo a structural transition to oscillating correlations. Thermodynamic functions cross over from a square-root rise in ion density to a milder n_i^{1/4} increase that respects the Onsager bound. Asymmetries in charge and mass are examined for applications to multiply charged ions and helium plasmas.

Core claim

We show the strong structural similarity of these two classes of Coulomb systems, which physics is determined mostly by contributions proportional to e^4 and e^6. We predict at higher densities a structural transition to oscillating correlations. The thermodynamic functions show a smooth transition from a quadratic root increase to a slower increase like n_i^{1/4} which observes the Onsager bound. Effects of asymmetries in charges and masses are studied with applications to ionic systems with multiple charges and to high-temperature plasmas, in particular, to plasmas with He^{2+}-ions.

What carries the argument

The exponential interaction model combined with the Yukhnovskii-Kelbg statistical framework, which isolates the dominant e^4 and e^6 contributions driving the shared behavior of the two Coulomb systems.

If this is right

  • Both electrolytes and plasmas exhibit a density-driven transition from monotonic to oscillating pair correlations.
  • Thermodynamic quantities in both systems cross over smoothly from square-root to n_i^{1/4} scaling while remaining consistent with the Onsager bound.
  • Charge and mass asymmetries produce distinct thermodynamic and structural signatures in multi-valent ionic solutions and in helium plasmas.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The shared scaling crossover may allow electrolyte experiments to inform plasma equation-of-state tables at densities where direct plasma measurements are difficult.
  • Transport coefficients such as conductivity or diffusion could inherit the same e^4/e^6 dominance and therefore display analogous density dependence in the two systems.
  • The framework suggests that existing Monte Carlo or molecular-dynamics codes calibrated on one class of system could be transferred to the other with only minor reparameterization.

Load-bearing premise

The exponential interaction model together with the Yukhnovskii-Kelbg statistical framework remains quantitatively accurate for both strong electrolytes and T > 10^5 K plasmas without additional quantum or higher-order corrections that would alter the claimed e^4/e^6 dominance or the predicted scaling crossover.

What would settle it

Direct measurement of pair-correlation functions at increasing densities in either strong electrolytes or T > 10^5 K plasmas that fails to show the onset of oscillations, or thermodynamic data that deviates from the n_i^{1/4} regime while violating the Onsager bound, would falsify the central similarity and scaling claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22111 by M. Holovko, W. Ebeling.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Ihor Yukhnovskii (left) visited Rostock in 1966 and in 1972 and got a close friend of Günter Kelbg (right). In reply, Günter Kelbg and his coworkers visited Lviv several times, developing a close collaboration (photo by Dorit Hagen). Further, more general models of effective interactions for electrolytes with non-additive radii were developed [24–27], in particular, in common work with Hartmut Krienke [28]… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: (Colour online) The function characterizing the decay of the opposite charge density around an ion in the Yukhnovskii–Kelbg theory for the density parameters 𝜅/𝛼 = 1 (exponentially decaying red curve above), for 𝜅/𝛼 = 2.5 (green curve with minimum below on r.h.s.) and for 𝜅/𝛼 = 9 (blue curve with minimum below on l.h.s.). We note that the negative parts correspond to the second charge shells with the same … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: figure 3. On the other hand, we have seen that the structural effects, observed, e.g., in the correlation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (Colour online) The relative pressure for hydrogen and for helium plasmas in Yukhnovskii– Kelbg approximation at 𝑇 = 200 kK. Comparison of the second order approximation (green for H and turquoise for He curves) with the third (logarithmic) approximation (red for H and blue for He). The curves for 2nd and 3rd approximation for hydrogen (green and red curves) are near each other but those for Helium (blue a… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Remembering here the work of two pioneers of the statistical physics of Coulomb systems, G\"unter Kelbg, and Ihor Yukhnovskii, we analyze their methods and give some new applications to ionic solutions and quantum plasmas. In particular, we develop applications of the theory to strong electrolytes and to thermal high-temperature plasmas at $T > 0^5$ K using the exponential interaction model. We show the strong structural similarity of these two classes of Coulomb systems, which physics is determined mostly by contributions proportional to $e^4$ and $e^6$. We predict at higher densities a structural transition to oscillating correlations. The thermodynamic functions show a smooth transition from a quadratic root increase to a slower increase like $n_i^{1/4}$ which observes the Onsager bound. Effects of asymmetries in charges and masses are studied with applications to ionic systems with multiple charges and to high-temperature plasmas, in particular, to plasmas with He$^{2+}$-ions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript revisits the statistical mechanics methods of Yukhnovskii and Kelbg for Coulomb systems and applies the exponential interaction model to strong electrolytes and high-temperature plasmas (T > 10^5 K). It claims strong structural similarity between these two classes of systems, with the dominant physics arising from contributions proportional to e^4 and e^6. The authors predict a transition to oscillating correlations at higher densities and a smooth crossover in thermodynamic functions from an n_i^{1/2} increase to a slower n_i^{1/4} increase that obeys the Onsager bound. Charge and mass asymmetries are examined with applications to multi-charge ionic systems and He^{2+}-containing plasmas.

Significance. If the central derivations hold, the work would supply a unified statistical framework linking electrolytes and high-T plasmas through explicit e^4/e^6 dominance, together with concrete predictions for a structural transition and a thermodynamic scaling crossover. The reuse of established Yukhnovskii-Kelbg techniques is a methodological strength, and the scaling result is presented as satisfying a known bound. However, the significance hinges on whether the exponential model remains quantitatively accurate at the densities where the new predictions are made.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (exponential model and e^6 term): the claim that the physics is determined mostly by e^4 and e^6 contributions, and that a structural transition to oscillating correlations occurs at higher densities, rests on the assumption that short-range quantum diffraction and higher-order cluster corrections remain negligible; no quantitative bound on these corrections is supplied at the densities where the transition is predicted, leaving open the possibility that they alter the sign or magnitude of the e^6 term.
  2. [Thermodynamic scaling section] Thermodynamic scaling section (near Eq. for free energy): the reported smooth crossover from n_i^{1/2} to n_i^{1/4} behavior is asserted to follow from the model and to obey the Onsager bound, yet the manuscript provides neither an explicit derivation of the n_i^{1/4} exponent nor a direct comparison against the exact Onsager limit or Debye-Hückel asymptotics, making it impossible to judge whether the scaling is an independent prediction or follows tautologically from the chosen closure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the temperature threshold is written 'T > 0^5 K'; this should read T > 10^5 K.
  2. [Introduction] Notation: the symbol n_i is used for ion density without an explicit definition in the opening paragraphs; a brief reminder of its relation to the total particle density would aid readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond to each major point below, indicating where revisions will be made to address the concerns.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (exponential model and e^6 term): the claim that the physics is determined mostly by e^4 and e^6 contributions, and that a structural transition to oscillating correlations occurs at higher densities, rests on the assumption that short-range quantum diffraction and higher-order cluster corrections remain negligible; no quantitative bound on these corrections is supplied at the densities where the transition is predicted, leaving open the possibility that they alter the sign or magnitude of the e^6 term.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not supply a quantitative bound on the size of short-range quantum diffraction and higher-cluster corrections at the densities of interest. The exponential interaction model is adopted from the Yukhnovskii-Kelbg framework precisely because the e^4 and e^6 terms dominate the structural and thermodynamic behavior in the regime examined; this dominance follows from the screened-potential expansion used in the original works. In the revision we will add an order-of-magnitude estimate of the neglected terms, based on the thermal de Broglie wavelength and the convergence radius of the cluster series, to delineate the density window where the predicted transition remains reliable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Thermodynamic scaling section] Thermodynamic scaling section (near Eq. for free energy): the reported smooth crossover from n_i^{1/2} to n_i^{1/4} behavior is asserted to follow from the model and to obey the Onsager bound, yet the manuscript provides neither an explicit derivation of the n_i^{1/4} exponent nor a direct comparison against the exact Onsager limit or Debye-Hückel asymptotics, making it impossible to judge whether the scaling is an independent prediction or follows tautologically from the chosen closure.

    Authors: The n_i^{1/4} scaling is obtained by retaining the e^6 contribution in the free-energy functional of the exponential model; this term produces a density dependence that grows more slowly than the Debye-Hückel n_i^{1/2} term while remaining consistent with the Onsager bound on the excess free energy. We agree that an explicit derivation and side-by-side comparison are needed for clarity. The revised manuscript will contain a step-by-step derivation of the exponent together with a direct numerical comparison against both the pure Debye-Hückel asymptotics and the Onsager limiting form. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims follow from external framework application

full rationale

The paper applies the Yukhnovskii-Kelbg statistical methods and exponential interaction model to electrolytes and plasmas, deriving structural similarity from e^4/e^6 contributions, a transition to oscillating correlations, and thermodynamic scaling crossover (sqrt(n) to n^{1/4}) that respects the Onsager bound. These are presented as direct consequences of the referenced external framework without any quoted self-definitional reductions, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The derivation chain remains independent of the target results and is self-contained against the cited prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5710 in / 1192 out tokens · 26576 ms · 2026-06-26T11:19:14.710656+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

64 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    YukhnovskiiI.,SelectedWorks.Physics,PublishingHouseofLvivPolytechnicNationalUniversity,Lviv,2002, (in Ukrainian)

    2002

  2. [2]

    Yukhnovskii), Eurosvit, Lviv, 2010, (in Ukrainian)

    YukhnovskiiI.,BinaryDistributionFunctionforaSystemofChargedInteractingParticles(BasedonPhDthesis by I.R. Yukhnovskii), Eurosvit, Lviv, 2010, (in Ukrainian)

    2010

  3. [3]

    E., Yukhnovskii I

    Glauberman A. E., Yukhnovskii I. R., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 1952,22, 562, (in Russian)

    1952

  4. [4]

    Yukhnovskii I. R., Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz., 1954,27, 690, (in Russian)

    1954

  5. [5]

    Iukhnovskii I. R., Sov. Phys. JETP, 1958,7, No. 2, 263–270

    1958

  6. [6]

    N., Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, 1939–1980, Statistical Mechanics, Vol

    Bogoliubov N. N., Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics, 1939–1980, Statistical Mechanics, Vol. 5, Nauka, Moscow, 2006, (in Russian)

    1939

  7. [7]

    BogoliubovN.N.,EquilibriumStatisticalMechanics,1945–1986,StatisticalMechanics,Vol.6,Nauka,Moscow, 2006, (in Russian)

    1945

  8. [8]

    R., Golovko M

    Iukhnovskii I. R., Golovko M. F., Statistical Theory of the Classical Equilibrium Systems, Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1980, (in Russian)

    1980

  9. [9]

    R., Holovko M

    Yukhnovskii I. R., Holovko M. F., Statistical Theory of Classical Equilibrium Systems, 2nd ed., Akademperi- odyka, Kyiv, 2025, doi:10.15407/akademperiodyka.558.444

    work page doi:10.15407/akademperiodyka.558.444 2025

  10. [10]

    Falkenhagen H., Theorie der Elektrolyte, Hirzel Leipzig, 1971, (in German)

    1971

  11. [11]

    Falkenhagen H., Ebeling W., In: Satyendranath Bose 70th birthday commemoration volume, Vol. 2, Prof. S. N. Bose 70th Birthday Celebration Committee [1965-66], Calcutta, 1966

    1965

  12. [12]

    Y., Visn

    Glauberman A. Y., Visn. Lviv. Derzh. Univ., Ser. Fiz., 1962,1, 10–31, (in Ukrainian)

    1962

  13. [13]

    5, Springer, New York, 1998

    Barthel J., Krienke H., Kunz W., Physical Chemistry of Electrolyte Solutions: Modern Aspects, Topics in physical chemistry, Vol. 5, Springer, New York, 1998. 23501-17 W. Ebeling, M. Holovko

    1998

  14. [14]

    HarnedH.S.,OwenB.B.,ThePhysicalChemistryofElectrolyticSolutions,ReinholdPublishingCorporation, 1958

    1958

  15. [15]

    Kelbg G., Wiss. Z. U. Rostock MNR, 1959/60,9, 41

    1959

  16. [16]

    (Ed.), Pergamon Press, New York, London, 1962

    Kelbg G., In: Electrolytes, Pesce B. (Ed.), Pergamon Press, New York, London, 1962

    1962

  17. [17]

    Phys., 1962,464, 159–167, doi:10.1002/andp.19624640307, (in German)

    Kelbg G., Ann. Phys., 1962,464, 159–167, doi:10.1002/andp.19624640307, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19624640307 1962

  18. [18]

    Phys., 1963,467, 219–224, doi:10.1002/andp.19634670308, (in German)

    Kelbg G., Ann. Phys., 1963,467, 219–224, doi:10.1002/andp.19634670308, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19634670308 1963

  19. [19]

    Phys., 1963,467, 354–360, doi:10.1002/andp.19634670703, (in German)

    Kelbg G., Ann. Phys., 1963,467, 354–360, doi:10.1002/andp.19634670703, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19634670703 1963

  20. [20]

    D., Redmer R., Röpke G., Contrib

    Bonitz M., Ebeling W., Filinov A., Kraeft W. D., Redmer R., Röpke G., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 2023,63, e202300029, doi:10.1002/ctpp.202300029

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.202300029 2023

  21. [21]

    XXIX, Collected Physical Papers, 2011,8, 452–467, (in Ukrainian)

    Holovko M., In: Proceeding of Shevchenko Scientific Society, Vol. XXIX, Collected Physical Papers, 2011,8, 452–467, (in Ukrainian)

    2011

  22. [22]

    Matter Phys., 2025,28, 23101, doi:10.5488/cmp.28.23101

    Ebeling W., Condens. Matter Phys., 2025,28, 23101, doi:10.5488/cmp.28.23101

    work page doi:10.5488/cmp.28.23101 2025

  23. [23]

    Kelbg G., Hoffmann H. J., Ann. Phys., 1963,469, 310–318, doi:10.1002/andp.19644690508, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19644690508 1963

  24. [24]

    Matter Phys., 2013,16, 43006, doi:10.5488/CMP.16.43006

    Krienke H., Condens. Matter Phys., 2013,16, 43006, doi:10.5488/CMP.16.43006

    work page doi:10.5488/cmp.16.43006 2013

  25. [25]

    Ebeling W., Feistel R., Krienke H., J. Mol. Liq., 2022,346, 117814, doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117814

    work page doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2021.117814 2022

  26. [26]

    Ebeling W., Feistel R., Krienke H., On statistical calculations of individual ionic activity coefficients of elec- trolytes and seawater. I. Basics — Draft 14 Apr 2019, 2019, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.18591.20640

    work page doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.18591.20640 2019

  27. [27]

    Matter Phys., 2023,26, 23602, doi:10.5488/CMP.26.23602

    Ebeling W., Krienke H., Condens. Matter Phys., 2023,26, 23602, doi:10.5488/CMP.26.23602

    work page doi:10.5488/cmp.26.23602 2023

  28. [28]

    F., Krienke H., Mol

    Golovko M. F., Krienke H., Mol. Phys., 1989,68, 967, doi:10.1080/00268978900102671

    work page doi:10.1080/00268978900102671 1989

  29. [29]

    Onsager L., J. Phys. Chem., 1939,43, 189

    1939

  30. [30]

    C., Holden H., Kjelstrup Ratkje S

    Hemmer P. C., Holden H., Kjelstrup Ratkje S. (Eds.), The collected works of Lars Onsager, World Scientic Singapore, Singapore, 1996

    1996

  31. [31]

    E., Aust

    Salpeter E. E., Aust. J. Phys., 1954,7, 373, doi:10.1071/PH540373

    work page doi:10.1071/ph540373 1954

  32. [32]

    Nordholm S., Chem. Phys. Lett., 1984,105, 302, doi:10.1016/0009-2614(84)85035-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0009-2614(84)85035-6 1984

  33. [33]

    FriedmanH.L.,IonicSolutionTheory:BasedonClusterExpansionMethods,IntersciencePublishers,NewYork, 1962

    1962

  34. [34]

    A., Fundamental Theory of Liquids: Method of Distribution Functions, Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1992

    Martynov G. A., Fundamental Theory of Liquids: Method of Distribution Functions, Adam Hilger, Bristol, 1992

    1992

  35. [35]

    Evans R., Leote de Carvalho R. J. F., Henderson J. R., Hoyle D. C., J. Chem. Phys., 1994,100, 591, doi:10.1063/1.466920

    work page doi:10.1063/1.466920 1994

  36. [36]

    Leote de Carvalho R. J. F., Evans R., Mol. Phys., 1994,83, 619, doi:10.1080/00268979400101491

    work page doi:10.1080/00268979400101491 1994

  37. [37]

    EbelingW.,FortovV.E.,FilinovV.,QuantumStatisticsofDenseGasesandNonidealPlasmas,SpringerSeries in Plasma Science and Technology, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017, doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 66637-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319- 2017

  38. [38]

    E., Filinov V

    Fortov V. E., Filinov V. S., Larkin A. S., Ebeling W., Statistical Physics of Dense Gases and Nonideal Plasmas, FizMatLit, Moscow, 2020, (in Russian)

    2020

  39. [39]

    A., Statistical Mechanics of Coulomb Systems, EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2025

    Alastuey A., Martin P. A., Statistical Mechanics of Coulomb Systems, EPFL Press, Lausanne, 2025

    2025

  40. [40]

    Hau-RiegeS.P.,WeisheitJ.,CastorJ.I.,LondonR.A.,ScottH.,RichardsD.F.,NewJ.Phys.,2013,15,015011, doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/015011

    work page doi:10.1088/1367-2630/15/1/015011 2013

  41. [41]

    Stolzmann W., Ebeling W., Phys. Lett. A, 1998,249, 242, doi:10.1016/S0375-9601(98)00659-8

    work page doi:10.1016/s0375-9601(98)00659-8 1998

  42. [42]

    E., Phys

    DeWitt H. E., Phys. Rev. A, 1976,14, 1290, doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.14.1290

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.14.1290 1976

  43. [43]

    D, Ebeling W., Röpke G., Quantum Statistics of Charged Particle Systems, Plenum Press, New York, 1986

    Kremp D., Kraeft W. D, Ebeling W., Röpke G., Quantum Statistics of Charged Particle Systems, Plenum Press, New York, 1986

    1986

  44. [44]

    W., Hutson V

    Outhwaite C. W., Hutson V. L. C., Mol. Phys., 1975,29, 1521, doi:10.1080/00268977500101331

    work page doi:10.1080/00268977500101331 1975

  45. [45]

    Cats R., Evans A., Härtel R., van Roij R., J. Chem. Phys., 2021,154, 124504, doi:10.1063/5.0039619

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0039619 2021

  46. [46]

    Ebeling W., Röpke G., Plasma, 2023,6, 1, doi:10.3390/plasma6010001

    work page doi:10.3390/plasma6010001 2023

  47. [47]

    EbelingW.,KraeftW.D.,KrempD.,TheoryofBoundStatesandIonizationEquilibriuminPlasmasandSolids, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1976

    1976

  48. [48]

    Plasma Phys., 2025,65, e70009, doi:10.1002/ctpp.70009

    Ebeling W., Röpke G., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 2025,65, e70009, doi:10.1002/ctpp.70009

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.70009 2025

  49. [49]

    Phys., 1967,19, 104, doi:10.1002/andp.19674740113, (in German)

    Ebeling W., Ann. Phys., 1967,19, 104, doi:10.1002/andp.19674740113, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19674740113 1967

  50. [50]

    Phys., 1968,21, 315, doi:10.1002/andp.19684760512, (in German)

    Ebeling W., Ann. Phys., 1968,21, 315, doi:10.1002/andp.19684760512, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19684760512 1968

  51. [51]

    Phys., 1969,22, 383, doi:10.1002/andp.19694770708, (in German)

    Ebeling W., Ann. Phys., 1969,22, 383, doi:10.1002/andp.19694770708, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/andp.19694770708 1969

  52. [52]

    Ebeling W., Physica, 1968,40, 290, doi:10.1016/0031-8914(68)90025-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-8914(68)90025-6 1968

  53. [53]

    Ebeling W., Physica, 1969,43, 293, doi:10.1016/0031-8914(69)90009-3

    work page doi:10.1016/0031-8914(69)90009-3 1969

  54. [54]

    Alastuey A., Cornu F., Perez A., Phys. Rev. E, 1995,51, 1725, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.51.1725

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.51.1725 1995

  55. [55]

    Kahlbaum T., J. Phys. IV, 2000,10, No. Pr5, 455–459, doi:10.1051/jp4:2000588

    work page doi:10.1051/jp4:2000588 2000

  56. [56]

    Plasma Phys., 2026, e70078, doi:10.1002/ctpp.70078

    Röpke G., Lin C., Ebeling W., Reinholz H., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 2026, e70078, doi:10.1002/ctpp.70078

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.70078 2026

  57. [57]

    23501-18 On the statistical theory of strong electrolytes and high-temperature plasmas

    Ebeling W., Röpke G., Plasma Phys., 2026,33, 032705, doi:10.1063/5.0313273. 23501-18 On the statistical theory of strong electrolytes and high-temperature plasmas

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0313273 2026

  58. [58]

    Plasma Phys., 2016,56, 163, doi:10.1002/ctpp.201500118

    Ebeling W., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 2016,56, 163, doi:10.1002/ctpp.201500118

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.201500118 2016

  59. [59]

    Plasma Phys., 1967,8, 233, doi:10.1002/ctpp.19670070307, (in German)

    Ebeling W., Hoffmann H., Kelbg G., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 1967,8, 233, doi:10.1002/ctpp.19670070307, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.19670070307 1967

  60. [60]

    Plasma Phys., 1968,8, 43, doi:10.1002/ctpp.19680080105, (in German)

    Hoffmann H., Ebeling W., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 1968,8, 43, doi:10.1002/ctpp.19680080105, (in German)

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.19680080105 1968

  61. [61]

    P., Ebeling W., Tkachenko I

    Sadykova S. P., Ebeling W., Tkachenko I. M., Eur. Phys. J. D, 2011,61, 117, doi:10.1140/epjd/e2010-10118-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjd/e2010-10118-y 2011

  62. [62]

    D., Alastuey A., Gaffney J

    Whitley H. D., Alastuey A., Gaffney J. A., Cauble R., Kraeft W. D., Bonitz M., Contrib. Plasma Phys., 2015, 55, 102, doi:10.1002/ctpp.201400083

    work page doi:10.1002/ctpp.201400083 2015

  63. [64]

    P., Ceperley D

    Bonitz M., Vorberger J., Bethkenhagen M., Böhme M. P., Ceperley D. M., Filinov A., Gawne T., Graziani F., Gregori G., Hamann P. et al., Phys. Plasmas, 2024,31, 110501, doi:10.1063/5.0219405

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0219405 2024

  64. [65]

    V., Bonitz M., Phys

    Filinov A. V., Bonitz M., Phys. Rev. E, 2023,108, 055212, doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.108.055212. До статистичної теорiї сильних електролiтiв та високотемпературної плазми: новi застосування робiт Юхновського та Кельбга В. Ебелiнг1, М. Головко 2 1 Iнститут фiзики, Унiверситет Гумбольдта, Берлiн, Нiмеччина, 2 Iнститут фiзики конденсованих систем iм. I. Р . Юхновс...

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.108.055212 2023