pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.22186 · v1 · pith:XS3UYTMFnew · submitted 2026-06-20 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Reversible nonrelativistic magnon spin transport in ferroelastic altermagnets

Haozhou Cai , Jian Wu , Weiyi Pan This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 11:34 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords altermagnetsmagnon spin transportferroelasticityspin Seebeck effectspin Nernst effectmagnetoelastic coupling2D materialsCoTe2
0
0 comments X

The pith

Ferroelastic transitions in 2D altermagnets switch the sign of nonrelativistic magnon spin Seebeck and Nernst conductivities by reorienting crystal axes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that ferroelastic transitions in two-dimensional altermagnets reorient the principal crystal axes and thereby change the magnetic exchange anisotropy. This magnetoelastic effect produces anisotropic magnon spin transport whose direction reverses when the ferroelastic state switches. The reversal occurs without external magnetic fields and without Berry curvature, directly affecting the spin Seebeck and spin Nernst conductivities. Calculations on a CoTe2 monolayer confirm that the compensated magnetic order remains intact while the transport signs flip. A reader cares because the mechanism supplies a nonvolatile, stray-field-free route to reconfigure magnon currents in antiferromagnetic insulators.

Core claim

In two-dimensional altermagnets, ferroelastic transitions reorient principal crystal axes and modulate the underlying magnetic exchange anisotropy; the resulting magnetoelastic coupling produces nonrelativistic anisotropic spin transport that is ferroelastically switchable, yielding sign reversals in the spin Seebeck and spin Nernst conductivities without external magnetic fields or Berry curvature, as shown by first-principles and spin-model calculations on the CoTe2 monolayer.

What carries the argument

Magnetoelastic coupling between ferroelastic strain and magnetic exchange anisotropy that reorients crystal axes and reverses magnon transport signs.

If this is right

  • Spin Seebeck conductivity reverses sign upon ferroelastic switching.
  • Spin Nernst conductivity reverses sign upon ferroelastic switching.
  • Magnon spin currents become controllable by strain alone in the absence of net magnetization or external fields.
  • The same symmetry mechanism applies to other 2D altermagnets that support ferroelasticity.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Strain control could be combined with existing ferroelectric substrates to achieve electrical writing of magnon transport states.
  • The mechanism may extend to other magnon-mediated effects such as spin pumping or thermal Hall responses in the same class of materials.
  • Device architectures could exploit the two stable ferroelastic states as binary memory elements for magnonic signals.

Load-bearing premise

Ferroelastic transitions can be induced and stabilized in the 2D altermagnet monolayer without disrupting the compensated magnetic order.

What would settle it

First-principles calculations or measurements on CoTe2 showing that ferroelastic strain produces no change in spin Seebeck or spin Nernst sign.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22186 by Haozhou Cai, Jian Wu, Weiyi Pan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1: (a) Ferroelastic switching of a rectangular lattice altermagnet, with forbidden symmetries labeled. (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2: (a) Top and side views of the crystal structures [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3: (a) Ferroelastic switching of the spin current under a thermal gradient along the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnons in antiferromagnetic (AFM) insulators facilitate low-dissipation, stray-field-free spin transport. However, achieving nonvolatile, field-free control over magnon spin currents remains elusive. Here, based on symmetry analysis, we propose a universal mechanism for the active manipulation of magnon spin transport via ferroelastic transitions in two-dimensional (2D) altermagnets (AMs)-a class of unconventional AFMs simultaneously exhibiting compensated magnetization and nonrelativistic spin splitting. We show that these transitions effectively reorient principal crystal axes and modulate the underlying magnetic exchange anisotropy. Consequently, this magnetoelastic coupling drives nonrelativistic anisotropic spin transport that is ferroelastically switchable without the need for external magnetic fields or Berry curvature, leading to sign reversals in the spin Seebeck and spin Nernst conductivities. We validate this mechanism using first-principles calculations and spin-model analyses of an AM CoTe2 monolayer. Our findings establish a symmetry-based magnetoelastic paradigm for the nonvolatile control of magnon spin transport in 2D AMs, opening new avenues toward energy-efficient, reconfigurable AFM magnonic devices.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a symmetry-based mechanism in which ferroelastic transitions in 2D altermagnets reorient principal crystal axes, modulate magnetic exchange anisotropy, and thereby produce nonrelativistic, field-free, switchable magnon spin transport with sign reversals in the spin Seebeck and spin Nernst conductivities. The mechanism is illustrated on a CoTe2 monolayer and supported by first-principles calculations together with spin-model analyses.

Significance. If substantiated, the work supplies a magnetoelastic route to nonvolatile control of magnon currents that avoids external fields and Berry curvature, which would be of clear interest for reconfigurable AFM magnonics.

major comments (3)
  1. [Symmetry analysis] Symmetry analysis: the claim that a ferroelastic transition can be realized in the CoTe2 monolayer while preserving compensated altermagnetic order and nonrelativistic spin splitting is not yet load-bearing; the energy landscape under strain must be shown explicitly to confirm that the transition barrier is accessible, that net magnetization remains zero, and that the altermagnetic splitting survives.
  2. [First-principles calculations and spin-model analyses] First-principles and spin-model section: the reported sign reversals in the magnon conductivities depend on the modulation of exchange anisotropy; the values of the relevant exchange parameters (J1, J2, anisotropy terms) before and after the transition, together with the magnon dispersion used to compute the conductivities, must be tabulated so that the reversal can be reproduced and shown not to arise from parameter adjustment.
  3. [Spin Seebeck and spin Nernst conductivities] Conductivity calculations: the temperature dependence and any cutoff or approximation employed in evaluating the spin Seebeck and spin Nernst responses should be stated, because small changes in the anisotropy ratio can alter the sign; without this information the robustness of the reversal cannot be assessed.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'symmetry analysis section of the abstract' in the abstract is unclear; replace with the appropriate section number in the main text.
  2. [Figures] Figure captions should indicate the strain values at which the ferroelastic switch is evaluated and whether the plotted conductivities include thermal broadening.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to provide the requested details and calculations.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Symmetry analysis] Symmetry analysis: the claim that a ferroelastic transition can be realized in the CoTe2 monolayer while preserving compensated altermagnetic order and nonrelativistic spin splitting is not yet load-bearing; the energy landscape under strain must be shown explicitly to confirm that the transition barrier is accessible, that net magnetization remains zero, and that the altermagnetic splitting survives.

    Authors: We agree that explicit mapping of the energy landscape under strain will make the ferroelastic transition claim more robust. In the revised manuscript we will add first-principles total-energy calculations versus uniaxial strain, demonstrating an accessible barrier, confirming that net magnetization remains zero, and verifying that the altermagnetic spin splitting is preserved across the transition. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [First-principles calculations and spin-model analyses] First-principles and spin-model section: the reported sign reversals in the magnon conductivities depend on the modulation of exchange anisotropy; the values of the relevant exchange parameters (J1, J2, anisotropy terms) before and after the transition, together with the magnon dispersion used to compute the conductivities, must be tabulated so that the reversal can be reproduced and shown not to arise from parameter adjustment.

    Authors: We appreciate the request for full reproducibility. The revised manuscript will contain a new table listing the first-principles values of J1, J2 and all anisotropy terms for both the unstrained and ferroelastically strained configurations, together with the magnon dispersion relations employed in the conductivity calculations. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Spin Seebeck and spin Nernst conductivities] Conductivity calculations: the temperature dependence and any cutoff or approximation employed in evaluating the spin Seebeck and spin Nernst responses should be stated, because small changes in the anisotropy ratio can alter the sign; without this information the robustness of the reversal cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We will expand the methods section to state explicitly the temperature range, the Brillouin-zone integration scheme, any magnon-mode energy cutoffs, and the linear spin-wave approximation used. These additions will allow readers to assess the sensitivity of the sign reversals to the anisotropy ratio. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Symmetry analysis plus independent first-principles validation on CoTe2 yields no circular reduction

full rationale

The derivation proceeds from symmetry-allowed magnetoelastic coupling under ferroelastic reorientation of principal axes, which modulates exchange anisotropy and thereby produces sign reversal in the nonrelativistic spin Seebeck and spin Nernst conductivities. These relations are then checked by explicit first-principles spin-model calculations on the CoTe2 monolayer. No equation is defined in terms of its own output, no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction, and no load-bearing uniqueness claim rests on a self-citation chain. The central result therefore remains externally falsifiable by the DFT data rather than tautological with its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated beyond standard use of density-functional theory and spin models.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5734 in / 1148 out tokens · 15566 ms · 2026-06-26T11:34:35.387162+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

81 extracted references

  1. [1]

    A. V. Chumak, A. A. Serga, and B. Hillebrands, Magnon transistor for all-magnon data processing, Nat. Commun. 5, 4700 (2014)

    2014

  2. [2]

    A. V. Chumak, V. I. Vasyuchka, A. A. Serga, and B. Hille- brands, Magnon spintronics, Nat. Phys.11, 453 (2015)

    2015

  3. [3]

    Flebus, D

    B. Flebus, D. Grundler, B. Rana, Y. Otani, I. Bar- sukov, A. Barman, G. Gubbiotti, P. Landeros, J. Ak- erman, U. Ebels, P. Pirro, V. E. Demidov, K. Schultheiss, G. Csaba, Q. Wang, F. Ciubotaru, D. E. Nikonov, P. Che, R. Hertel, T. Ono, D. Afanasiev, J. Mentink, T. Rasing, B. Hillebrands, S. V. Kusminskiy, W. Zhang, C. R. Du, A. Finco, T. van der Sar, Y. K...

    2024

  4. [4]

    Cheng, J

    R. Cheng, J. Xiao, Q. Niu, and A. Brataas, Spin Pumping and Spin-Transfer Torques in Antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 057601 (2014)

    2014

  5. [5]

    Baltz, A

    V. Baltz, A. Manchon, M. Tsoi, T. Moriyama, T. Ono, and Y. Tserkovnyak, Antiferromagnetic spintronics, Rev. Mod. Phys.90, 015005 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    S. M. Rezende, A. Azevedo, and R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, Introduction to antiferromagnetic magnons, J. Appl. Phys. 126, 151101 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    Flebus, Magnonics in collinear magnetic insulating systems, J

    B. Flebus, Magnonics in collinear magnetic insulating systems, J. Appl. Phys.129, 161101 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Y. Wang, J. Xia, H. Xu, G. Lan, X. Han, and G. Yu, Magnons in van der Waals antiferromagnetic materials, Adv. Funct. Mater.36, e17690 (2026)

    2026

  9. [9]

    S. Seki, T. Ideue, M. Kubota, Y. Kozuka, R. Takagi, M. Nakamura, Y. Kaneko, M. Kawasaki, and Y. Tokura, Thermal generation of spin current in an antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 266601 (2015)

    2015

  10. [10]

    S. M. Rezende, R. L. Rodríguez-Suárez, and A. Azevedo, Theory of the spin Seebeck effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B93, 014425 (2016)

    2016

  11. [11]

    J. Li, Z. Shi, V. H. Ortiz, M. Aldosary, C. Chen, V. Aji, P. Wei, and J. Shi, Spin Seebeck effect from antiferromag- netic magnons and critical spin fluctuations in epitaxial FeF2 films, Phys. Rev. Lett.122, 217204 (2019)

    2019

  12. [12]

    Cheng, S

    R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Spin Nernst effect of magnons in collinear antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016)

    2016

  13. [13]

    V. A. Zyuzin and A. A. Kovalev, Magnon spin Nernst effect in antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 217203 (2016)

    2016

  14. [14]

    K. H. Lee, S. B. Chung, K. Park, and J.-G. Park, Magnonic quantum spin Hall state in the zigzag and stripe phases of the antiferromagnetic honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B97, 180401 (2018)

    2018

  15. [15]

    Bazazzadeh, M

    N. Bazazzadeh, M. Hamdi, F. Haddadi, A. Khavasi, A. Sadeghi, and S. M. Mohseni, Symmetry enhanced spin-Nernst effect in honeycomb antiferromagnetic transi- tion metal trichalcogenide monolayers, Phys. Rev. B103, 014425 (2021)

    2021

  16. [16]

    L.-D. Yuan, Z. Wang, J.-W. Luo, E. I. Rashba, and A. Zunger, Giant momentum-dependent spin splitting in centrosymmetric low-Z antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 102, 014422 (2020)

    2020

  17. [17]

    H.-Y. Ma, M. Hu, N. Li, J. Liu, W. Yao, J.-F. Jia, and J. Liu, Multifunctional antiferromagnetic materials with giant piezomagnetism and noncollinear spin current, Nat. Commun.12, 2846 (2021)

    2021

  18. [18]

    Mazin and The PRX Editors, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A new punch line of fundamen- tal magnetism, Phys

    I. Mazin and The PRX Editors, Editorial: Altermagnetism—A new punch line of fundamen- tal magnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040002 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    Šmejkal, J

    L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conven- tional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: A phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Altermagnets as a new class of functional materials, Nat. Rev. Mater.10, 473 (2025). 6

    2025

  21. [21]

    Huang, C

    Y. Huang, C. Hua, R. Xu, J. Liu, Y. Zheng, and Y. Lu, Spin inversion enforced by crystal symmetry in ferroelastic altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 266701 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    Šmejkal, A

    L. Šmejkal, A. Marmodoro, K.-H. Ahn, R. González- Hernández, I. Turek, S. Mankovsky, H. Ebert, S. W. D’Souza, O. Šipr, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Chiral magnons in altermagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 256703 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Z. Liu, M. Ozeki, S. Asai, S. Itoh, and T. Masuda, Chiral split magnon in altermagnetic MnTe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 156702 (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    Hoyer, P

    R. Hoyer, P. P. Stavropoulos, A. Razpopov, R. Valentí, L. Šmejkal, and A. Mook, Altermagnetic splitting of magnons in hematiteα-Fe2O3, Phys. Rev. B112, 064425 (2025)

    2025

  25. [25]

    X. Chen, Y. Liu, P. Liu, Y. Yu, J. Ren, J. Li, A. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Unconventional magnons in collinear magnets dictated by spin space groups, Nature640, 349 (2025)

    2025

  26. [26]

    Q. Sun, J. Guo, D. Wang, D. L. Abernathy, W. Tian, and C. Li, Observation of chiral magnon band splitting in altermagnetic hematite, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186703 (2025)

    2025

  27. [27]

    Y. Xie, D. Wang, C. Li, X. Shen, and J. Zhang, A general theory of chiral splitting of magnons in two-dimensional magnets (2026), arXiv:2601.15031 [cond-mat]

    arXiv 2026

  28. [28]

    Q. Cui, B. Zeng, P. Cui, T. Yu, and H. Yang, Efficient spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects of magnons in alter- magnets, Phys. Rev. B108, L180401 (2023)

    2023

  29. [29]

    H. Yu, W. Feng, F. Zheng, and Y. Yao, Chiral magnons in an altermagnetic Janus Mn2SeTe Monolayer, Compu- tational Materials Today4, 100021 (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    Weißenhofer and A

    M. Weißenhofer and A. Marmodoro, Atomistic spin dy- namics simulations of magnonic spin Seebeck and spin Nernst effects in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B110, 094427 (2024)

    2024

  31. [31]

    Y. Yang, D. Wang, B. Yang, P. Wang, Y. Mu, Y. Tian, B. Zheng, W. Qin, K. Wang, B. Huang, B. Wang, X. Wan, and D. Wu, Altermagnet-driven magnon spin splitting Nernst effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 026701 (2026)

    2026

  32. [32]

    Y. Wang, D. Zhu, Y. Yang, K. Lee, R. Mishra, G. Go, S.-H. Oh, D.-H. Kim, K. Cai, E. Liu, S. D. Pollard, S. Shi, J. Lee, K. L. Teo, Y. Wu, K.-J. Lee, and H. Yang, Magnetization switching by magnon-mediated spin torque through an antiferromagnetic insulator, Science366, 1125 (2019)

    2019

  33. [33]

    Huang, X

    X. Huang, X. Chen, Y. Li, J. Mangeri, H. Zhang, M. Ramesh, H. Taghinejad, P. Meisenheimer, L. Caretta, S. Susarla, R. Jain, C. Klewe, T. Wang, R. Chen, C.-H. Hsu, I. Harris, S. Husain, H. Pan, J. Yin, P. Shafer, Z. Qiu, D. R. Rodrigues, O. Heinonen, D. Vasudevan, J. Íñiguez, D. G. Schlom, S. Salahuddin, L. W. Martin, J. G. Analytis, D. C. Ralph, R. Cheng,...

    2024

  34. [34]

    Zhang, H

    Y. Zhang, H. Bai, J. Dai, L. Han, C. Chen, S. Liang, Y. Cao, Y. Zhang, Q. Wang, W. Zhu, F. Pan, and C. Song, Electrical manipulation of spin splitting torque in alter- magnetic RuO2, Nat. Commun.16, 5646 (2025)

    2025

  35. [35]

    C. Liu, Y. Luo, D. Hong, S. S.-L. Zhang, H. Saglam, Y. Li, Y. Lin, B. Fisher, J. E. Pearson, J. S. Jiang, H. Zhou, J. Wen, A. Hoffmann, and A. Bhattacharya, Electric field control of magnon spin currents in an antiferromagnetic insulator, Sci. Adv.7, eabg1669 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Cheng, R

    J. Cheng, R. Yu, L. Sun, K. He, T. Ji, M. Yang, Z. Zhang, X. Hu, H. Niu, X. Yang, P. Chen, G. Chen, J. Xiao, F. Huang, X. Lu, H. Cai, H. Yuan, B. Miao, and H. Ding, A nonvolatile magnon field effect transistor at room tem- perature, Nat. Commun.15, 9314 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    D. L. Esteras, A. Rybakov, A. M. Ruiz, and J. J. Baldoví, Magnon straintronics in the 2D van der Waals ferromagnet CrSBr from first-principles, Nano Lett.22, 8771 (2022)

    2022

  38. [38]

    Y. Zhou, T. Guo, L. Qiao, Q. Wang, M. Zhu, J. Zhang, Q. Liu, M. Zhao, C. Wan, W. He, H. Bai, L. Han, L. Huang, R. Chen, Y. Zhao, X. Han, F. Pan, and C. Song, Piezoelectric strain-controlled magnon spin current trans- port in an antiferromagnet, Nano Lett.22, 4646 (2022)

    2022

  39. [39]

    Geprägs, A

    S. Geprägs, A. Kehlberger, F. D. Coletta, Z. Qiu, E.-J. Guo, T. Schulz, C. Mix, S. Meyer, A. Kamra, M. Al- thammer, H. Huebl, G. Jakob, Y. Ohnuma, H. Adachi, J. Barker, S. Maekawa, G. E. W. Bauer, E. Saitoh, R. Gross, S. T. B. Goennenwein, and M. Kläui, Origin of the spin Seebeck effect in compensated ferrimagnets, Nat. Commun.7, 10452 (2016)

    2016

  40. [40]

    Parsonnet, L

    E. Parsonnet, L. Caretta, V. Nagarajan, H. Zhang, H. Taghinejad, P. Behera, X. Huang, P. Kavle, A. Fer- nandez, D. Nikonov, H. Li, I. Young, J. Analytis, and R. Ramesh, Nonvolatile electric field control of thermal magnons in the absence of an applied magnetic field, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 087601 (2022)

    2022

  41. [41]

    K. Li, L. Wang, Y. Wang, Y. Guo, S. Lv, Y. He, W. Lin, T. Min, S. Hu, S. Yang, D. Xue, A. Zheng, S. Yang, and X. Ding, Electric field switching of magnon spin current in a compensated ferrimagnet, Adv. Mater.36, 2312137 (2024)

    2024

  42. [42]

    L. Wang, L. Shen, H. Bai, H.-A. Zhou, K. Shen, and W. Jiang, Electrical excitation and detection of chiral magnons in a compensated ferrimagnetic insulator, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 166705 (2024)

    2024

  43. [43]

    Kawamoto, T

    Y. Kawamoto, T. Kikkawa, M. Kawamata, Y. Umemoto, A. G. Manning, K. C. Rule, K. Ikeuchi, K. Kamazawa, M. Fujita, E. Saitoh, K. Kakurai, and Y. Nambu, Un- derstanding spin currents from magnon dispersion and polarization: Spin-Seebeck effect and neutron scatter- ing study on Tb3Fe5O12, Appl. Phys. Lett.124, 132406 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    J. Fu, M. Kuisma, A. H. Larsen, K. Shinohara, A. Togo, and K. S. Thygesen, Symmetry classification of 2D ma- terials: Layer groups versus space groups, 2D Mater.11, 035009 (2024)

    2024

  45. [45]

    Zeng and Y.-J

    S. Zeng and Y.-J. Zhao, Description of two-dimensional altermagnetism: Categorization using spin group theory, Phys. Rev. B110, 054406 (2024)

    2024

  46. [46]

    [12, 28, 29, 45, 47, 49, 52, 56, 62–81]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL to be inserted] for moredetailson(1)first-principlescalculations, (2)phonon spectra and mechanical properties, (3) calculations of the magnon bands, and (4) derivation and symmetry analysis of magnon conductivities, which includes Refs. [12, 28, 29, 45, 47, 49, 52, 56, 62–81]

  47. [47]

    Höpfner, I

    Y. Höpfner, I. Mertig, and R. R. Neumann, Sign changes in heat, spin, and orbital magnon transport coefficients in Kitaev ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B111, 214404 (2025)

    2025

  48. [48]

    ferroelastic

    K. Aizu, Possible species of “ferroelastic” crystals and of simultaneously ferroelectric and ferroelastic crystals, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.27, 387 (1969)

    1969

  49. [49]

    R. Peng, S. Fang, P. Ho, F. Liu, T. Zhou, J. Liu, and Y. S. Ang, Ferroelastic altermagnetism, npj Quantum Mater. 11, 5 (2025)

    2025

  50. [50]

    Henkelman and H

    G. Henkelman and H. Jónsson, Improved tangent estimate 7 in the nudged elastic band method for finding minimum energy paths and saddle points, J. Chem. Phys.113, 9978 (2000)

    2000

  51. [51]

    Sheppard, P

    D. Sheppard, P. Xiao, W. Chemelewski, D. D. Johnson, and G. Henkelman, A generalized solid-state nudged elas- tic band method, J. Chem. Phys.136, 074103 (2012)

    2012

  52. [52]

    N. Ding, H. Ye, S.-S. Wang, and S. Dong, Ferroelastically tunable altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, L220410 (2025)

    2025

  53. [53]

    Zhang, Y

    T. Zhang, Y. Ma, X. Xu, C. Lei, B. Huang, and Y. Dai, Two-dimensional ferroelastic semiconductors in Nb2SiTe4 and Nb2GeTe4 with promising electronic properties, J. Phys. Chem. Lett.11, 497 (2020)

    2020

  54. [54]

    Wu and X

    M. Wu and X. C. Zeng, Intrinsic ferroelasticity and/or multiferroicity in two-dimensional phosphorene and phos- phorene analogues, Nano Lett.16, 3236 (2016)

    2016

  55. [55]

    Wang, W.-W

    S. Wang, W.-W. Wang, J. Fan, X. Zhou, X.-P. Li, and L. Wang, Two-dimensional dual-switchable ferroelectric altermagnets: Altering electrons and magnons, Nano Lett. 25, 14618 (2025)

    2025

  56. [56]

    Q. Cui, X. Bai, and A. Delin, Anisotropic magnon trans- port in van der Waals ferromagnetic insulators, Adv. Funct. Mater.35, 2407469 (2025)

    2025

  57. [57]

    González-Hernández, L

    R. González-Hernández, L. Šmejkal, K. Výborný, Y. Ya- hagi, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and J. Železný, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Ko- hda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  59. [59]

    H. Bai, L. Han, X. Y. Feng, Y. J. Zhou, R. X. Su, Q. Wang, L. Y. Liao, W. X. Zhu, X. Z. Chen, F. Pan, X. L. Fan, and C. Song, Observation of spin splitting torque in a collinear antiferromagnet RuO2, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 197202 (2022)

    2022

  60. [60]

    Sarkar and A

    S. Sarkar and A. Agarwal, Spin-split magnon bands induce pure spin current in insulating altermagnets, Phys. Rev. B112, 195420 (2025)

    2025

  61. [61]

    Y.Guo, A.Chen, Z.Zeng, T.An, Q.Cui, Y.Ga, D.Zheng, X. Deng, X. Zhang, M. Tang, Z. Zhu, C. Wu, J. Zhang, Y. Fan, Z. Wang, W. Song, P. Yan, T. Zhu, S. Wang, X. Han, J. Zhao, K. L. Wang, G. Yu, X. Zhang, and H. Wu, Magnetic memory driven by spin splitting torque in nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnet, Nat. Commun. 17, 1309 (2025)

    2025

  62. [62]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B50, 17953 (1994)

    1994

  63. [63]

    G.KresseandD.Joubert,Fromultrasoftpseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758 (1999)

    1999

  64. [64]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set, Comput. Mater. Sci.6, 15 (1996)

    1996

  65. [65]

    Kresse and J

    G. Kresse and J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Phys. Rev. B54, 11169 (1996)

    1996

  66. [66]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996)

    1996

  67. [67]

    S. L. Dudarev, G. A. Botton, S. Y. Savrasov, C. J. Humphreys, and A. P. Sutton, Electron-energy-loss spec- tra and the structural stability of nickel oxide: An LSDA+U study, Phys. Rev. B57, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  68. [68]

    Togo and I

    A. Togo and I. Tanaka, First principles phonon calcula- tions in materials science, Scr. Mater.108, 1 (2015)

    2015

  69. [69]

    V. Wang, N. Xu, J.-C. Liu, G. Tang, and W.-T. Geng, VASPKIT: A user-friendly interface facilitating high- throughput computing and analysis using VASP code, Comput. Phys. Commun.267, 108033 (2021)

    2021

  70. [70]

    Xiang, C

    H. Xiang, C. Lee, H.-J. Koo, X. Gong, and M.-H. Whangbo, Magnetic properties and energy-mapping anal- ysis, Dalton Trans.42, 823 (2013)

    2013

  71. [71]

    X. Li, H. Yu, F. Lou, J. Feng, M.-H. Whangbo, and H. Xiang, Spin Hamiltonians in magnets: Theories and computations, Molecules26, 803 (2021)

    2021

  72. [72]

    R. F. L. Evans, W. J. Fan, P. Chureemart, T. A. Ostler, M. O. A. Ellis, and R. W. Chantrell, Atomistic spin model simulations of magnetic nanomaterials, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter26, 103202 (2014)

    2014

  73. [73]

    W. Pan, C. Xu, X. Li, Z. Xu, B. Liu, B.-L. Gu, and W. Duan, Chiral magnetism in lithium-decorated mono- layer CrTe2: Interplay between Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction and higher-order interactions, Phys. Rev. B 109, 214405 (2024)

    2024

  74. [74]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev.58, 1098 (1940)

    1940

  75. [75]

    J. H. P. Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson Hamiltonian, Phys. A93, 327 (1978)

    1978

  76. [76]

    R. M. White, M. Sparks, and I. Ortenburger, Diagonaliza- tion of the antiferromagnetic magnon-phonon interaction, Phys. Rev.139, A450 (1965)

    1965

  77. [77]

    Keffer, H

    F. Keffer, H. Kaplan, and Y. Yafet, Spin Waves in Ferro- magnetic and Antiferromagnetic Materials, Am. J. Phys 21, 250 (1953)

    1953

  78. [78]

    McCreary, J

    A. McCreary, J. R. Simpson, T. T. Mai, R. D. McMichael, J. E. Douglas, N. Butch, C. Dennis, R. Valdés Aguilar, and A. R. Hight Walker, Quasi-two-dimensional magnon identification in antiferromagnetic FePS3 via magneto- Raman spectroscopy, Phys. Rev. B101, 064416 (2020)

    2020

  79. [79]

    T. T. Mai, K. F. Garrity, A. McCreary, J. Argo, J. R. Simpson, V. Doan-Nguyen, R. V. Aguilar, and A. R. H. Walker, Magnon-phonon hybridization in 2D antiferro- magnet MnPSe3, Sci. Adv.7, eabj3106 (2021)

    2021

  80. [80]

    H. Cai, Z. Xu, J. Wu, and W. Pan, Tunable Chern in- sulator states with coexisting magnonic and electronic topology in two-dimensional honeycomb Kitaev ferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. B113, 134413 (2026)

    2026

Showing first 80 references.