Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 95 references

FAUST XXXI. Grain properties and variability of three sources in GSS 30

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read ALMA imaging of GSS 30 finds tens-of-micron grains and 650-1510 Earth masses of dust in IRS3, free-free emission in IRS1, and 420-second brightness changes in IRS2.

desk verdict New ALMA maps and a short-timescale variability detection in GSS 30 are the real additions here, but the grain-size fit for IRS3 runs into the exact spectral-index problem the stress-test flags. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.22489 v1 pith:OL7JL2R3 submitted 2026-06-21 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA

Q. Yang , H. Baobab Liu , S. Feng , C. J. Chandler , F. Fontani , N. Sakai , Y. Oya , T. Hanawa
show 50 more authors
C. Codella C. Ceccarelli I. Jiménez-Serra L. Cacciapuoti E. Bianchi M. Bouvier M. De Simone A. Isella D. Johnstone L. Loinard G. Sabatini Y. Shirley Y. Aikawa M. J. Maureira P. Caselli F. Menard N. Balucani E. Caux S. Charnley N. Cuello F. Dulieu L. Evans D. Fedele T. Hama E. Herbst T. Hirota B. Lefloch A. López-Sepulcre L. T. Maud A. Miotello G. Moellenbrock H. Nomura Y. Oba S. Ohashi Y. Okoda J. Pineda L. Podio A. Rimola T. Sakai D. Segura-Cox B. Svoboda L. Testi C. Vastel S. Viti N. Watanabe Y. Watanabe Y. Zhang Z. E. Zhang F. O. Alves S. Yamamoto
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.EPastro-ph.GA
keywords protostarsdustgrainsspectralindexALMAobservationsyoungstellarobjectsmillimeteremissionvariabilityGSS30
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents 0.5-arcsecond ALMA continuum observations at 1.2-3.0 mm of the GSS 30 complex to examine dust properties in three embedded protostars. Spectral-index maps and SED fitting are used to derive radial grain-size variations and total dust mass for IRS3, while the central emission from IRS1 is interpreted through its low spectral index and the time behavior of IRS2 is tracked across epochs. These measurements matter because they link observed spectral properties directly to grain growth, optical-depth effects, and possible magnetic activity inside class 0/I disks. The work shows that outflow directions and envelope structures can alter apparent spectral indices and that short-timescale millimeter changes can trace protostellar flares.

What carries the argument

Spectral-index mapping from multi-band continuum images combined with SED fitting to constrain maximum grain size and dust mass; multi-epoch brightness tracking to detect variability.

What would settle it

A new set of 1.2-3 mm observations that recovers a flat or inverted spectral-index map for IRS3 or shows no brightness change in IRS2 on 420-second timescales would falsify the reported grain sizes and flare interpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Spectral index rises radially from 2.0 to 2.5 in IRS3 but falls to 1.6-1.8 along the outflow; SED modeling yields maximum grain sizes of tens of microns and dust mass 650-1510 Earth masses. IRS1 exhibits alpha less than 0.8 at its center, matching marginally optically thick free-free emission. IRS2 shows brightness variations over 420 seconds that multi-epoch data indicate are flares lasting tens of minutes and likely produced by magnetic activity.

Load-bearing premise

The observed spectral indices are taken to reflect dust grain properties and optical depth without major contributions from calibration errors or other emission processes, and the brightness changes are taken to be intrinsic rather than artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Grain growth to tens of microns and dust masses of hundreds of Earth masses can already be present inside class 0/I disks.
  • Lower spectral indices along outflow directions can arise from cold envelope dust obscuring warmer inner material.
  • Millimeter continuum can vary on minute timescales when magnetic activity occurs in the protostar.
  • Extended structures around IRS1 may trace streamers or outflow-disk interactions that affect apparent disk properties.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If similar spectral-index gradients appear in other embedded sources, grain growth may be a common early-stage process rather than a later one.
  • Repeated short-cadence observations could test whether the flares correlate with accretion-rate changes or X-ray bursts.
  • Higher-resolution data might separate the contributions of envelope obscuration from true radial grain-size changes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents 0.5-arcsec ALMA observations at 1.2-3.0 mm of the GSS 30 complex from the FAUST program. It derives spectral indices for three embedded sources, reports a radial increase from 2.0 to 2.5 in IRS3 with SED fitting that yields a_max of tens of microns and dust mass 650-1510 M_earth, interprets IRS1's central alpha < 0.8 as marginally optically thick free-free emission, and attributes IRS2 brightness variations over 420 s to protostellar magnetic flares, while noting environmental effects such as outflow obscuration and possible streamers.

Significance. If the radiative-transfer modeling is shown to produce the required central optical depths, the work supplies useful multi-wavelength constraints on grain growth in Class 0/I disks and reports a rare mm-wavelength variability detection. The new high-resolution data and emphasis on environmental influences are positive contributions to the field.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / SED fitting section] Abstract and modeling section: the central spectral index ~2.0 for IRS3 is reconciled with a_max of only tens of microns only if the fitted model produces tau ≳ 1 at the wavelengths used; the manuscript does not report the derived central optical-depth values or perform the necessary sensitivity tests on temperature/density structure, leaving the grain-size inference vulnerable to the alternative explanation of larger grains (beta ~ 0) in the optically thin limit.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract should state the exact frequency pairs or bands used to compute the reported spectral indices.
  2. [Modeling / results section] Clarify whether the quoted dust mass assumes a standard gas-to-dust ratio and list the opacity model (e.g., astronomical silicate) adopted in the SED fits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's positive assessment of our work and their recommendation for major revision. We address the single major comment below by agreeing to include additional details from our modeling to support the grain growth interpretation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / SED fitting section] Abstract and modeling section: the central spectral index ~2.0 for IRS3 is reconciled with a_max of only tens of microns only if the fitted model produces tau ≳ 1 at the wavelengths used; the manuscript does not report the derived central optical-depth values or perform the necessary sensitivity tests on temperature/density structure, leaving the grain-size inference vulnerable to the alternative explanation of larger grains (beta ~ 0) in the optically thin limit.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this important point. Upon re-examination of our radiative transfer modeling, the best-fit models do indeed yield central optical depths τ ≳ 1 at both 1.2 mm and 3.0 mm for IRS3, which supports the interpretation that the observed spectral index of ~2.0 arises in the optically thick regime for maximum grain sizes of tens of microns rather than requiring β ≈ 0 in the thin limit. In the revised version of the manuscript, we will explicitly report these central optical depth values and include a brief discussion of the sensitivity of the results to assumptions about the temperature and density structure. This addition will strengthen the robustness of our grain-size conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: new observations and independent SED modeling

full rationale

The paper reports fresh ALMA continuum maps at 1.2-3 mm, directly measures radial spectral-index profiles from those maps, and then performs standard radiative-transfer SED fitting to the observed fluxes and indices to constrain a_max and dust mass. None of the load-bearing steps (spectral-index extraction, optical-depth inference, or grain-size fitting) reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs or to a self-citation chain; the modeling assumptions are stated explicitly and the results remain falsifiable against the raw visibilities. No self-definitional, fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction, or uniqueness-imported-from-authors patterns appear.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on standard dust modeling assumptions and fitting procedures common in the field.

free parameters (2)
  • maximum grain size = tens of microns
    Derived from SED fitting for IRS3
  • dust mass = 650-1510 M_earth
    From modeling
assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Dust opacity models link spectral index to grain size distribution
    Standard assumption in interpreting mm continuum emission
  • domain assumption Brightness variations over short timescales indicate intrinsic source variability
    Assumed for attributing to magnetic flares

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of FAUST XXXI. Grain properties and variability of three sources in GSS 30." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OL7JL2R3

@misc{pith2026260622489,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: FAUST XXXI. Grain properties and variability of three sources in GSS 30},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OL7JL2R3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.22489}
}
read the original abstract

To advance our understanding of dust properties in class 0/I young stellar objects, it is crucial to resolve their structures at multiple wavelengths and investigate how grain growth and environmental effects shape their spectral properties. We present 0.5 arcsec resolution ALMA observations of the GSS 30 complex at 1.2-3.0 mm from the FAUST large programme, achieving a linear resolution of 69 au. We analyse the dust continuum emission and perform modelling to constrain dust properties and disk structures. For IRS3, the spectral index increases radially from 2.0 at the centre to 2.5 at the disk edge, while decreasing to 1.6-1.8 along the outflow direction. The asymmetric low-alpha region towards the northeastern blueshifted lobe may result from cold outer envelope dust obscuring warmer inner regions. SED fitting suggests maximum grain sizes of tens of microns and a dust mass of 650-1510 M_earth. IRS1 is associated with an extended north-eastern structure, which may represent an outflow-disk complex, a trailing structure linked to a circumbinary disk, or a gas streamer accreting onto IRS1. The central IRS1 shows alpha < 0.8, consistent with marginally optically thick free-free emission. IRS2 displays brightness variations over 420 s, and multi-epoch comparison suggests a flare lasting tens of minutes, likely caused by magnetic activity in the protostar. Our results highlight the importance of environmental effects, including dust obscuration and streamer structures, in shaping the observed properties of young disks, and reveal millimetre variability associated with possible protostellar magnetic flares.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.22489 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The continuum images obtained by combining the ALMA 12 m and 7 m arrays, using Briggs weighting of 2.0 to enhance the recov￾ery of more extended emissions. Graymap shows the primary beam un￾corrected continuum emission at 1.2 mm (Setup2), while the 3σ black contour shows the extend structure and cyan contours overlay emissions ranging of [5, 50, 100, 200]×σ (σ = 47.6 µJy beam−1 ) for the compact region to keep clear… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Graymap displays a zoomed-in view of the primary beam corrected continuum emission towards IRS3 and IRS1 at 1.2 mm (Setup2), 1.3 mm (Setup1) and 3.0 mm (Setup3). The phase center (0,0) position is at coordinate according to Table A.2. (a)-(f) Using the same contours as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Spatial distribution of the 106–218 GHz spectral index (α106−218GHz; color) and the 218 GHz intensity distribution (contours). All images were generated with circular beams with FWHM= 0 ′′ .6. Contour levels are 276 µJy beam−1 (3-σ) ×[1, 2, 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, 256]. The red and blue dashed arrows indicate the redshifted and blueshifted outflows traced by CCH (N = 3–2, J = 7/2–5/2, F = 4–3 and 3–2) emission (left)… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Images of IRS2 at 1.2 mm with the time bin of 1 minute and the first and last frames having time bins of 98 s and 82 s, respectively. Red cross denote the IRS2 at center of α2000 = 16h26m22s.39, δ2000 = −24◦22′53′′ .51, and the yellow dashed circle has the radius of 1′…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: 1.2 mm light curve of IRS2, integrated from the 1′′ .5 circular re￾gion (yellow dashed circle in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The observed spectral energy distributions (SED; symbols), overplotted with the predictions from our simplified SED model (solid lines. We quote the observations reported in Dzib et al. (2013); Kirk et al. (2017); Coutens et al. (2019). The data points show in full cir…

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

95 extracted references

  1. [1]

    E., Sz˝ ucs, L., et al

    Agurto-Gangas, C., Pineda, J. E., Sz˝ ucs, L., et al. 2019, A&A, 623, A147 ALMA Partnership, Brogan, C. L., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, L3

    2019

  2. [2]

    O., Girart, J

    Alves, F. O., Girart, J. M., Caselli, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, L3

    2017

  3. [3]

    & Montmerle, T

    Andre, P. & Montmerle, T. 1994, ApJ, 420, 837

    1994

  4. [4]

    M., Huang, J., Pérez, L

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., Pérez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, L41

    2018

  5. [5]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol

    Bae, J., Isella, A., Zhu, Z., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y . Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 423

    2023

  6. [6]

    2016, ARA&A, 54, 491

    Bally, J. 2016, ARA&A, 54, 491

    2016

  7. [7]

    Beckwith, S. V . W. & Sargent, A. I. 1991, ApJ, 381, 250

    1991

  8. [8]

    Beckwith, S. V . W., Sargent, A. I., Chini, R. S., & Guesten, R. 1990, AJ, 99, 924

    1990

Show all 95 references
  1. [9]

    2015, A&A, 581, A119

    Beuther, H., Henning, T., Linz, H., et al. 2015, A&A, 581, A119

    2015

  2. [10]

    D., Linz, H., et al

    Beuther, H., Soler, J. D., Linz, H., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 168

    2020

  3. [11]

    P., Zhu, Z., et al

    Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., Zhu, Z., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, L45

    2018

  4. [12]

    Bjerkeli, P., van der Wiel, M. H. D., Harsono, D., Ramsey, J. P., & Jørgensen, J. K. 2016, Nature, 540, 406

    2016

  5. [13]

    A., et al

    Bontemps, S., André, P., Kaas, A. A., et al. 2001, A&A, 372, 173

    2001

  6. [14]

    2021, A&A, 653, A117

    Bouvier, M., López-Sepulcre, A., Ceccarelli, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 653, A117

    2021

  7. [15]

    2017, A&A, 604, A52

    Bracco, A., Palmeirim, P., André, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 604, A52

    2017

  8. [16]

    J., et al

    Cacciapuoti, L., Macias, E., Maury, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 676, A4

    2023

  9. [17]

    J., et al

    Cacciapuoti, L., Testi, L., Maury, A. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 700, A188

    2025

  10. [18]

    2024b, ApJ, 961, 90 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al

    Cacciapuoti, L., Testi, L., Podio, L., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 961, 90 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501

    2022

  11. [19]

    C., Ladd, E

    Chen, H., Myers, P. C., Ladd, E. F., & Wood, D. O. S. 1995, ApJ, 445, 377

    1995

  12. [20]

    P., Launhardt, R., & Henning, T

    Chen, X. P., Launhardt, R., & Henning, T. 2007, A&A, 475, 277

    2007

  13. [21]

    2014, ApJ, 785, L12

    Christiaens, V ., Casassus, S., Perez, S., van der Plas, G., & Ménard, F. 2014, ApJ, 785, L12

    2014

  14. [22]

    M., Gurwell, M

    Chung, C.-Y ., Andrews, S. M., Gurwell, M. A., et al. 2024, ApJS, 273, 29

    2024

  15. [23]

    2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 227

    Codella, C., Ceccarelli, C., Chandler, C., et al. 2021, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 8, 227

    2021

  16. [24]

    B., Jiménez-Serra, I., et al

    Coutens, A., Liu, H. B., Jiménez-Serra, I., et al. 2019, A&A, 631, A58

    2019

  17. [25]

    A., Teague, R., et al

    Czekala, I., Loomis, R. A., Teague, R., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 2

    2021

  18. [26]

    Dolidze, M. V . & Arakelyan, M. A. 1959, Soviet Ast., 3, 434

    1959

  19. [27]

    B., Cuello, N., et al

    Dong, R., Liu, H. B., Cuello, N., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 331

    2022

  20. [28]

    Draine, B. T. 2006, ApJ, 636, 1114

    2006

  21. [29]

    A., Loinard, L., Mioduszewski, A

    Dzib, S. A., Loinard, L., Mioduszewski, A. J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 775, 63

    2013

  22. [30]

    Elias, J. H. 1978, ApJ, 224, 453

    1978

  23. [31]

    L., Evans, II, N

    Enoch, M. L., Evans, II, N. J., Sargent, A. I., & Glenn, J. 2009, ApJ, 692, 973

    2009

  24. [32]

    Friesen, R. K. & Jarvis, E. 2024, ApJ, 969, 70

    2024

  25. [33]

    K., Pon, A., Bourke, T

    Friesen, R. K., Pon, A., Bourke, T. L., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 158

    2018

  26. [34]

    J., Valdivia, V ., et al

    Galametz, M., Maury, A. J., Valdivia, V ., et al. 2019, A&A, 632, A5 Galván-Madrid, R., Liu, H. B., Izquierdo, A. F., et al. 2018, ApJ, 868, 39

    2019

  27. [35]

    M., et al

    Gieser, C., Caselli, P., Segura-Cox, D. M., et al. 2025, A&A, 701, A165

    2025

  28. [36]

    L., Strom, K

    Grasdalen, G. L., Strom, K. M., & Strom, S. E. 1973, ApJ, 184, L53

    1973

  29. [37]

    D., Evans, II, N

    Green, J. D., Evans, II, N. J., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 123 Güdel, M. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 217

    2013

  30. [38]

    V ., Ramos, A., et al

    Harsono, D., Persson, M. V ., Ramos, A., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A26

    2020

  31. [39]

    J., Brown, J

    Herczeg, G. J., Brown, J. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Pontoppidan, K. M. 2011, A&A, 533, A112

    2011

  32. [40]

    Hildebrand, R. H. 1983, QJRAS, 24, 267

    1983

  33. [41]

    Hull, C. L. H. & Zhang, Q. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 3

    2019

  34. [42]

    2003, PASJ, 55, 653

    Imanishi, K., Nakajima, H., Tsujimoto, M., Koyama, K., & Tsuboi, Y . 2003, PASJ, 55, 653

    2003

  35. [43]

    D., & Evans, II, N

    Je, H., Lee, J.-E., Lee, S., Green, J. D., & Evans, II, N. J. 2015, ApJS, 217, 6 Jørgensen, J. K., Bourke, T. L., Myers, P. C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 659, 479 Jørgensen, J. K., van Dishoeck, E. F., Visser, R., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 861

    2015

  36. [44]

    & van Moorsel, G

    Jorsater, S. & van Moorsel, G. A. 1995, AJ, 110, 2037

    1995

  37. [45]

    M., Di Francesco, J., et al

    Kirk, H., Dunham, M. M., Di Francesco, J., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 114

    2017

  38. [46]

    B., Lai, S.-P., et al

    Ko, C.-L., Liu, H. B., Lai, S.-P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 172

    2020

  39. [47]

    G., Maureira, M

    Kong, S., Arce, H. G., Maureira, M. J., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 104

    2019

  40. [48]

    M., Matzner, C

    Kratter, K. M., Matzner, C. D., Krumholz, M. R., & Klein, R. I. 2010, ApJ, 708, 1585

    2010

  41. [49]

    Lee, C.-F., Ho, P. T. P., Li, Z.-Y ., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 0152

    2017

  42. [50]

    A., Feigelson, E

    Leous, J. A., Feigelson, E. D., Andre, P., & Montmerle, T. 1991, ApJ, 379, 683

    1991

  43. [51]

    I.-H., Liu, H

    Li, J. I.-H., Liu, H. B., Hasegawa, Y ., & Hirano, N. 2017, ApJ, 840, 72

    2017

  44. [52]

    W., et al

    Li, S., Sanhueza, P., Lee, C. W., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 165

    2022

  45. [53]

    2023, ApJ, 949, 109

    Li, S., Sanhueza, P., Zhang, Q., et al. 2023, ApJ, 949, 109

    2023

  46. [54]

    B., Li, D., et al

    Lin, Y ., Liu, H. B., Li, D., et al. 2016, ApJ, 828, 32

    2016

  47. [55]

    Liu, H. B. 2019, ApJ, 877, L22

    2019

  48. [56]

    B., Dunham, M

    Liu, H. B., Dunham, M. M., Pascucci, I., et al. 2018, A&A, 612, A54

    2018

  49. [57]

    B., Galván-Madrid, R., Forbrich, J., et al

    Liu, H. B., Galván-Madrid, R., Forbrich, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 780, 155

    2014

  50. [58]

    B., Mérand, A., Green, J

    Liu, H. B., Mérand, A., Green, J. D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 884, 97

    2019

  51. [59]

    B., Takami, M., Kudo, T., et al

    Liu, H. B., Takami, M., Kudo, T., et al. 2016, Science Advances, 2, e1500875

    2016

  52. [60]

    2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 943556

    Liu, J., Zhang, Q., & Qiu, K. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 943556

    2022

  53. [61]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 837

    Lu, X., Li, G.-X., Zhang, Q., & Lin, Y . 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 837

    2022

  54. [62]

    Machida, M. N. & Hosokawa, T. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1719

    2013

  55. [63]

    Mamajek, E. E. 2008, Astronomische Nachrichten, 329, 10

    2008

  56. [64]

    M., et al

    Massi, M., Forbrich, J., Menten, K. M., et al. 2006, A&A, 453, 959

    2006

  57. [65]

    J., Pineda, J

    Maureira, M. J., Pineda, J. E., Liu, H. B., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, L5

    2024

  58. [66]

    2024, A&A, 686, A253

    Mauxion, J., Lesur, G., & Maret, S. 2024, A&A, 686, A253

    2024

  59. [67]

    Mezger, P. G. & Henderson, A. P. 1967, ApJ, 147, 471

    1967

  60. [68]

    M., Pérez, L

    Miley, J. M., Pérez, L. M., Agurto-Gangas, C., et al. 2025, ApJ, 989, 11

    2025

  61. [69]

    2014, A&A, 567, A32

    Miotello, A., Testi, L., Lodato, G., et al. 2014, A&A, 567, A32

    2014

  62. [70]

    M., van Dishoeck, E

    Murillo, N. M., van Dishoeck, E. F., Hacar, A., Harsono, D., & Jørgensen, J. K. 2022, A&A, 658, A53

    2022

  63. [71]

    A., Hashimoto, J., et al

    Muto, T., Grady, C. A., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJ, 748, L22

    2012

  64. [72]

    B., Ohashi, S., et al

    Nakatani, R., Liu, H. B., Ohashi, S., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, L2 Öberg, K. I., Guzmán, V . V ., Walsh, C., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 1

    2020

  65. [73]

    J., Jørgensen, J

    Ohashi, N., Tobin, J. J., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 8 Ortiz-León, G. N., Loinard, L., Dzib, S. A., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, L33 Ortiz-León, G. N., Loinard, L., Kounkel, M. A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 141

    2023

  66. [74]

    & Fissel, L

    Pattle, K. & Fissel, L. 2019, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6, 15

    2019

  67. [75]

    E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P., et al

    Pineda, J. E., Segura-Cox, D., Caselli, P., et al. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 1158 Planck Collaboration XIV, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2014, A&A, 564, A45

    2020

  68. [76]

    & Cornwell, T

    Rau, U. & Cornwell, T. J. 2011, A&A, 532, A71

    2011

  69. [77]

    Reynolds, S. P. 1986, ApJ, 304, 713

    1986

  70. [78]

    J., et al

    Sabatini, G., Bianchi, E., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2025, A&A, 698, L16

    2025

  71. [79]

    2024, A&A, 684, L12

    Sabatini, G., Podio, L., Codella, C., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, L12

    2024

  72. [80]

    I., Stephens, I

    Sadavoy, S. I., Stephens, I. W., Myers, P. C., et al. 2019, ApJS, 245, 2

    2019

  73. [81]

    Safronov, V . S. 1960, Annales d’Astrophysique, 23, 979 Santamaría-Miranda, A., de Gregorio-Monsalvo, I., Ohashi, N., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A46

    1960

  74. [82]

    Schwartz, P. R. 1982, ApJ, 252, 589

    1982

  75. [83]

    M., Schmiedeke, A., Pineda, J

    Segura-Cox, D. M., Schmiedeke, A., Pineda, J. E., et al. 2020, Nature, 586, 228

    2020

  76. [84]

    Sheehan, P. D. & Eisner, J. A. 2018, ApJ, 857, 18

    2018

  77. [85]

    M., Agurto-Gangas, C., et al

    Sierra, A., Pérez, L. M., Agurto-Gangas, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 974, 102

    2024

  78. [86]

    J., Sheehan, P

    Tobin, J. J., Sheehan, P. D., Megeath, S. T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 890, 130

    2020

  79. [87]

    1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Tychoniec, Ł., Manara, C

    Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217 Tychoniec, Ł., Manara, C. F., Rosotti, G. P., et al. 2020, A&A, 640, A19

    1964

  80. [88]

    T., Pineda, J

    Valdivia-Mena, M. T., Pineda, J. E., Segura-Cox, D. M., et al. 2022, A&A, 667, A12

    2022

  81. [89]

    T., Pineda, J

    Valdivia-Mena, M. T., Pineda, J. E., Segura-Cox, D. M., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A92 Vargas-González, J., Forbrich, J., Rivilla, V . M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 56

    2023

  82. [90]

    A., Kastner, J

    Weintraub, D. A., Kastner, J. H., Griffith, L. L., & Campins, H. 1993, AJ, 105, 271

    1993

  83. [91]

    J., Drabek-Maunder, E., Rosolowsky, E., et al

    White, G. J., Drabek-Maunder, E., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 1996

    2015

  84. [92]

    2023, ApJ, 951, 11

    Yamato, Y ., Aikawa, Y ., Ohashi, N., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 11

    2023

  85. [93]

    J., Liu, H

    Zamponi, J., Maureira, M. J., Liu, H. B., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A56

    2024

  86. [94]

    Zhang, Q., Wootten, A., & Ho, P. T. P. 1997, ApJ, 475, 713 Article number, page 10 of 13 Yang et al.: FAUST XXXI. Grain properties and variability of three sources in GSS 30 1 Department of Astronomy, Xiamen University, Zengcuoan West

    1997

  87. [95]

    50" 52" 54

    Bologna, Italy 43 Transdisciplinary Research Area (TRA) ‘Matter’/Argelander- Institut für Astronomie, University of Bonn 44 Materials Science and Engineering, College of Engineering, Shibaura Institute of Technology, 3-7-5 Toyosu, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8548, Japan 45 Department o...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.