Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

Screening Under Competition

As of 16 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 17 of 17 outbound references and 0 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2606.22720.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2606.22720 v1

Coverage vector

measured 17 of 17 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

measured 17 of 17 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-15T06:32:42.880941+00:00

measured 0 of 0 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: cited_works

Reference resolution

17 of 17 outbound references displayed

verified exact0
verified fuzzy0
unresolved16
parse uncertain1
malformed identifier0
metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

Observation 4c2555b5-d9fd-4cbf-b6b4-827cc65bc035 · outbound

This paper cites The existence of such an equilib- rium follows from the proof of Corollary 3.1.

Screening Under Competition The existence of such an equilib- rium follows from the proof of Corollary 3.1

Reference 1

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e0d4d0d4-7361-462c-988e-0c60d297cf50 · outbound

This paper cites We can conclude that (q ′ 1, t′.

Screening Under Competition We can conclude that (q ′ 1, t′

Reference 2

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 04d98341-4547-4215-9f9a-f76dd032cde3 · outbound

This paper cites As for allθ∈Θ ′ A \Θ A, they stick to the original contract (q 1, t1).

Screening Under Competition As for allθ∈Θ ′ A \Θ A, they stick to the original contract (q 1, t1)

Reference 3

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1c3e3cf8-7737-4c0c-847d-7d886b776481 · outbound

This paper cites Firm 1 can be strictly better off by deviating toM ′, which completes the proof thatMis not an equilibrium.

Screening Under Competition Firm 1 can be strictly better off by deviating toM ′, which completes the proof thatMis not an equilibrium

Reference 4

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 948c1f53-137e-4ea0-898b-ae496d69174f · outbound

This paper cites Thus, p= ˆ∆(1−q k) +t k 1 +t k 2.(7) Since ∆k = ∆>0,q k <1, andt k 2 ≥0, we have ∆k(1−q k) +t k 2 >0.

Screening Under Competition Thus, p= ˆ∆(1−q k) +t k 1 +t k 2.(7) Since ∆k = ∆>0,q k <1, andt k 2 ≥0, we have ∆k(1−q k) +t k 2 >0

Reference 5

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 8bec8311-6e98-43db-bac9-8d96a4a03261 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Screening Under Competition Unresolved cited work

Reference 6

Resolution: parse uncertain; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 72ce49aa-4f2c-41cb-b7ed-8a8d229ac71a · outbound

This paper cites Hence, all types ∆> ˆ∆ strictly prefer (1, p), while all types ∆< ˆ∆ in the top interval do not prefer the new contract.

Screening Under Competition Hence, all types ∆> ˆ∆ strictly prefer (1, p), while all types ∆< ˆ∆ in the top interval do not prefer the new contract

Reference 7

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation e296db40-a24b-4152-88de-ff6c88e1d316 · outbound

This paper cites The utility gain from (1, p) over (q j, tj 1) paired with (1−q j, tj.

Screening Under Competition The utility gain from (1, p) over (q j, tj 1) paired with (1−q j, tj

Reference 8

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 88ff77ef-ff40-4dbe-af4b-17511e9848eb · outbound

This paper cites This expression is increasing in ∆, since 1−q j ≥0.

Screening Under Competition This expression is increasing in ∆, since 1−q j ≥0

Reference 9

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1abde818-cea0-44b6-a693-a80b5821b3f1 · outbound

This paper cites Summing these differences froml=jtok−1 yields ∆jqj −t j 1 −t j 2 = ∆jqk −t k 1 −t k 2 − k−1X l=j (∆j −∆ l)(ql+1 −q l).

Screening Under Competition Summing these differences froml=jtok−1 yields ∆jqj −t j 1 −t j 2 = ∆jqk −t k 1 −t k 2 − k−1X l=j (∆j −∆ l)(ql+1 −q l)

Reference 10

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a2b8218e-ade8-489c-9206-c9432a055aa8 · outbound

This paper cites The change in firm 1’s expected revenue is ∆Π1 = (p−t k 1) H(∆ k)−H( ˆ∆).

Screening Under Competition The change in firm 1’s expected revenue is ∆Π1 = (p−t k 1) H(∆ k)−H( ˆ∆)

Reference 11

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 734edbbe-4665-4a46-971f-6afbb201746f · outbound

This paper cites •Types with ∆>∆ K−1 buy exclusively from firm 1, choosing (1, p 1) from firm 1 and (0,0) from firm 2.

Screening Under Competition •Types with ∆>∆ K−1 buy exclusively from firm 1, choosing (1, p 1) from firm 1 and (0,0) from firm 2

Reference 12

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 1c87137c-0501-47d0-8566-4a273a731536 · outbound

This paper cites , K−1, the agent is indifferent between adjacent contractskandk+ 1: ∆k qk −s k = ∆k qk+1 −s k+1.

Screening Under Competition , K−1, the agent is indifferent between adjacent contractskandk+ 1: ∆k qk −s k = ∆k qk+1 −s k+1

Reference 13

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation a6d91e45-31d7-42dc-8e0e-8f45d9c0cb71 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Screening Under Competition Unresolved cited work

Reference 14

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation d6bc9d52-f8b9-4471-a45a-85a706071490 · outbound

This paper cites By the same calculation, with ∂∆k−1 ∂tk 2 = 1 αk and ∂∆k ∂tk 2 = −1 αk+1 , setting ∂Π2 ∂tk 2 = 0 yields: H(∆ k)−H(∆ k−1) + h(∆k−1) αk (tk−1 2 −t k.

Screening Under Competition By the same calculation, with ∂∆k−1 ∂tk 2 = 1 αk and ∂∆k ∂tk 2 = −1 αk+1 , setting ∂Π2 ∂tk 2 = 0 yields: H(∆ k)−H(∆ k−1) + h(∆k−1) αk (tk−1 2 −t k

Reference 15

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 9ceb6c02-0181-40bf-b5f8-a85f4ea28b47 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Screening Under Competition Unresolved cited work

Reference 16

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Observation 44f290f1-6af2-4f21-9422-9453bb5c6951 · outbound

This paper cites an unresolved cited work.

Screening Under Competition Unresolved cited work

Reference 17

Resolution: unresolved; no resolver link, observed 2026-06-26T09:13:13.073787Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

Pith citing papers

No inbound Pith citation observations are available.