pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23031 · v1 · pith:ITCVW6OHnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 💻 cs.CV

DrivingVoxels: Compositional Sparse Voxel Rasterization for Dynamic Driving Scene Reconstruction

Tania Aguirre , Luis Rold\~ao , Moussab Bennehar , Nathan Piasco , Dzmitry Tsishkou , Simone Rossi , Pietro Michiardi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 09:09 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords dynamic scene reconstructionsparse voxel rasterizationoctreesdriving scenesnovel view synthesisLiDAR initializationcompositional rendering3D Gaussian Splatting
0
0 comments X

The pith

DrivingVoxels reconstructs dynamic driving scenes by jointly rasterizing sparse voxels from separate octrees for each rigid object and the static background.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a compositional sparse voxel framework to reconstruct large driving scenes that contain both static elements and multiple moving rigid objects. It places each dynamic object in its own local-coordinate octree while keeping the background in a separate static octree, then renders all of them together in one pass. The representation stays fully explicit and is initialized from LiDAR data rather than learned from scratch. This design targets the memory growth and long training times seen in prior Gaussian-splatting approaches for driving data. If the claim holds, the method would deliver reconstruction quality comparable to slower techniques while finishing training in less time and scaling more gracefully to unbounded scenes.

Core claim

DrivingVoxels is a compositional sparse voxel rendering framework that jointly rasterizes voxels from multiple independent octrees within a single rendering pass. Each rigid dynamic object is represented by an octree defined in its local coordinate frame, while a separate static octree models the stationary background. The approach adopts a fully explicit, neural-free representation together with a LiDAR-guided structural initialization that efficiently captures scene geometry. On the PandaSet benchmark the method matches prior 3DGS-based work on perceptual metrics for novel-view synthesis and reconstruction, exceeds it on structural metrics, and requires shorter training times.

What carries the argument

Joint single-pass rasterization of multiple independent octrees, one per rigid dynamic object in its local frame plus one static background octree.

If this is right

  • Perceptual quality for novel view synthesis and reconstruction stays on par with prior 3DGS methods.
  • Structural metrics improve relative to those methods on the same benchmark.
  • Training completes in less time because of the LiDAR-anchored optimization workflow.
  • Memory growth remains controllable even as the driving scene expands.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The local-frame octrees could be updated independently when new object tracks become available, supporting online map maintenance.
  • Because the representation is fully explicit, the same octrees could be directly exported for use in physics simulators without additional conversion steps.
  • The single-pass joint rasterization may extend naturally to include additional sensor modalities such as radar returns placed in the same coordinate frames.

Load-bearing premise

That each rigid dynamic object can be modeled by an independent octree in its local coordinate frame and rasterized jointly with the static background without extra mechanisms for non-rigid motion or unbounded scene growth.

What would settle it

A measurable drop in structural metrics on a test sequence containing non-rigid motion such as walking pedestrians, when compared against a baseline that explicitly models deformation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23031 by Dzmitry Tsishkou, Luis Rold\~ao, Moussab Bennehar, Nathan Piasco, Pietro Michiardi, Simone Rossi, Tania Aguirre.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Dynamic Scene Reconstruction and Decomposition Performance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of the DrivingVoxels pipeline. Camera rays are cast into a composi￾tional scene of a global static background octree Obg in the world frame and independent dy￾namic assets octrees (Oi) in local canonical spaces. The ray path is decomposed into sequen￾tial front-to-back segments based on 3D bounding box intersections. Background segments are integrated in world space, while asset segments are trans… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Overview of the DrivingVoxels initialization. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Qualitative Comparison on Dynamic Driving Scenes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of Each Supervision Signal on Reconstructed Depth. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Post-Training Scene Editing with Explicit Voxel Assets. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Structured 3D Semantic Fusion Improves Scene Labels. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Open-Vocabulary Scene Queries in 3D. By fusing language-aligned features into the reconstructed voxel volume, DrivingVoxels supports text-driven localization at inference time. The queries "Cross Walk" and "Traffic Light" activate the corresponding scene regions with accurate spatial grounding from the same reconstruction. shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Qualitative Comparison of Reconstructed Depth Maps. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Quality-efficiency tradeoff. Comparison of LPIPS versus training time for Driv￾ingVoxels under different voxel budgets (1M, 2M, and 3M) against StreetGS. DrivingVox￾els achieves a highly competitive perceptual quality while requiring significantly less training time, allowing a predictable control over the performance-efficiency tradeoff. Quality-Efficiency Tradeoffs [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p02… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reconstructing dynamic urban scenes remains challenging due to the unbounded nature of driving environments and the presence of multiple dynamic objects. Currently, potentially faster sparse voxel methods are mainly designed for static scenarios. On the other hand, dynamic approaches based on 3D Gaussian Splatting, despite their high-fidelity, are often time-consuming for driving scenarios and exhibit uncontrollable memory growth in large scenes. To address these limitations, we present DrivingVoxels, a compositional sparse voxel rendering framework for dynamic driving scenes. Our method jointly rasterizes sparse voxels from multiple independent octrees within a single rendering pass. Each rigid dynamic object is represented by an octree defined in its local coordinate frame, while a separate static octree models the stationary background. DrivingVoxels adopts a fully explicit, neural-free representation together with a LiDAR-guided structural initialization that efficiently captures scene geometry. We evaluate our framework on the PandaSet benchmark, demonstrating that DrivingVoxels performs on par on perceptual metrics and better on structural metrics for NVS and reconstruction while requiring shorter training times than previous 3DGS-base methods to an efficient optimization workflow anchored by a strong LiDAR prior.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces DrivingVoxels, a compositional sparse voxel rasterization framework for dynamic driving scene reconstruction. It jointly renders from a static background octree and independent octrees for each rigid dynamic object (defined in local coordinates), using a fully explicit neural-free representation with LiDAR-guided initialization. On PandaSet, it claims on-par perceptual metrics, superior structural metrics for novel view synthesis and reconstruction, and shorter training times than prior 3DGS-based methods.

Significance. If the compositional octree design and LiDAR prior deliver the claimed efficiency and quality, the work offers a practical explicit alternative to 3DGS for large-scale dynamic urban scenes, with potential advantages in training speed and memory control for driving applications.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The performance claims (on-par perceptual, better structural metrics, shorter training) rest on the compositional structure maintaining fidelity for rigid objects only. The manuscript must explicitly address how non-rigid elements (pedestrians, cyclists) common in PandaSet are handled or approximated, as this directly affects whether the reconstruction advantages hold.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract and Method: No mechanism is described for controlling memory growth as the vehicle trajectory lengthens in unbounded scenes. The claim that independent local octrees prevent uncontrollable growth requires a concrete analysis or bound (e.g., memory vs. trajectory length) to support the efficiency advantage over 3DGS.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The final sentence contains a grammatical issue ('than previous 3DGS-base methods to an efficient optimization workflow'); rephrase for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which help clarify the scope and strengthen the efficiency claims. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The performance claims (on-par perceptual, better structural metrics, shorter training) rest on the compositional structure maintaining fidelity for rigid objects only. The manuscript must explicitly address how non-rigid elements (pedestrians, cyclists) common in PandaSet are handled or approximated, as this directly affects whether the reconstruction advantages hold.

    Authors: We agree that explicit clarification is needed. The framework is designed exclusively for rigid dynamic objects, as stated in the abstract and method: each such object receives an independent octree in its local coordinate frame, while the background uses a separate static octree. Non-rigid elements (pedestrians, cyclists) in PandaSet fall outside this design and are not assigned dedicated dynamic octrees; they may be approximated as rigid during segmentation or partially absorbed into the static background octree. In the revised manuscript we will add a paragraph in Section 3 and a qualifying sentence in the abstract to state this scope limitation and note that the reported metrics apply to the rigid-object subset of the scenes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and Method: No mechanism is described for controlling memory growth as the vehicle trajectory lengthens in unbounded scenes. The claim that independent local octrees prevent uncontrollable growth requires a concrete analysis or bound (e.g., memory vs. trajectory length) to support the efficiency advantage over 3DGS.

    Authors: We acknowledge that a quantitative memory analysis would strengthen the efficiency argument. The compositional design keeps each dynamic object in its own local octree, so memory scales with the number and geometric complexity of objects rather than total path length; new objects encountered along an extended trajectory receive new, bounded octrees instead of accumulating primitives in a single global structure. The current manuscript does not contain an explicit plot or bound relating memory to trajectory length. In the revision we will add an analysis subsection with both theoretical reasoning and empirical measurements on longer PandaSet sequences, directly comparing memory growth curves against 3DGS baselines. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; method is a direct compositional design with external benchmarks

full rationale

The paper introduces DrivingVoxels as an explicit compositional sparse voxel framework using independent octrees for rigid objects and background, initialized via LiDAR. No derivation chain, equations, or predictions are presented that reduce to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. Performance claims rest on external PandaSet evaluation against prior 3DGS methods, with no self-referential fitting or uniqueness theorems invoked. The design assumptions (rigidity, bounded growth) are stated explicitly as limitations rather than derived results. This is a standard engineering contribution without load-bearing circular steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract alone supplies no concrete free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; evaluation limited to high-level claims.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5756 in / 1073 out tokens · 28662 ms · 2026-06-26T09:09:10.708975+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In: Proc

    Chen, A., Xu, Z., Geiger, A., Yu, J., Su, H.: TensoRF: Tensorial radiance fields. In: Proc. of the European Conf. on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2022)

    2022

  2. [2]

    In: Proc

    Chen, Y., Dong, S., Wang, X., Cai, L., Zheng, Y., Yang, Y.: SG-NeRF: Neural surface reconstruction with scene graph optimization. In: Proc. of the European Conf. on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    In: Proc

    Chen, Y., Haines, M., Wang, J., Baron-Lis, K., Manivasagam, S., Yang, Z., Urtasun, R.: SaLF: Sparse local fields for multi-sensor rendering in real-time. In: Proc. IEEE International Conf. on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2026)

    2026

  4. [4]

    International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) (2026)

    Chen, Y., Gu, C., Jiang, J., Zhu, X., Zhang, L.: Periodic vibration gaussian: Dynamic urban scene reconstruction and real-time rendering. International Journal of Computer Vision (IJCV) (2026)

    2026

  5. [5]

    In: International Conf

    Chen, Z., Yang, J., Huang, J., de Lutio, R., Esturo, J.M., Ivanovic, B., Litany, O., Gojcic, Z., Fidler, S., Pavone, M., Song, L., Wang, Y.: OmniRe: Omni urban scene reconstruction. In: International Conf. on Learning Repre- sentations (ICLR) (2025)

    2025

  6. [6]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Djeghim, H., Piasco, N., Bennehar, M., Roldao, L., Tsishkou, D., Sidibé, D.: ViiNeuS: Volumetric initialization for implicit neural surface reconstruction of urban scenes with limited image overlap. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)) (2025)

    2025

  7. [7]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Fridovich-Keil, S., Yu, A., Tancik, M., Chen, Q., Recht, B., Kanazawa, A.: Plenoxels: Radiance fields without neural networks. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Guédon, A., Lepetit, V.: SuGaR: Surface-aligned gaussian splatting for efficient 3d mesh reconstruction and high-quality mesh rendering. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024)

    2024

  9. [9]

    arXiv:2306.04988 (2023)

    Guo, J., Deng, N., Li, X., Bai, Y., Shi, B., Wang, C., Ding, C., Wang, D., Li, Y.: StreetSurf: Extending multi-view implicit surface reconstruction to street views. arXiv:2306.04988 (2023)

    work page arXiv 2023

  10. [10]

    arXiv:2504.15776 (2025)

    Herau, Q., Piasco, N., Bennehar, M., Rolado, L., Tsishkou, D.V., Liu, B., Migniot, C., Vasseur, P., Demonceaux, C.: Pose optimization for autonomous driving datasets using neural rendering models. arXiv:2504.15776 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  11. [11]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) (2023)

    Kerbl, B., Kopanas, G., Leimkuehler, T., Drettakis, G.: 3D gaussian splatting for real-time radiance field ren- dering. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2025) 16 T

    Li, J., Zhang, J., Zhang, Y., Bai, X., Zheng, J., Yu, X., Gu, L.: GeoSVR: Taming sparse voxels for geometrically accurate surface reconstruction. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2025) 16 T. Aguirre et al

    2025

  13. [13]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2020)

    Liu, L., Gu, J., Lin, K.Z., Chua, T.S., Theobalt, C.: Neural sparse voxel fields. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2020)

    2020

  14. [14]

    In: Proc

    Mildenhall, B., Srinivasan, P.P., Tancik, M., Barron, J.T., Ramamoorthi, R., Ng, R.: NeRF: Representing scenes as neural radiance fields for view synthesis. In: Proc. of the European Conf. on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2020)

    2020

  15. [15]

    ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) (2022)

    Müller, T., Evans, A., Schied, C., Keller, A.: Instant neural graphics primitives with a multiresolution hash encoding. ACM Transactions on Graphics (SIGGRAPH) (2022)

    2022

  16. [16]

    arXiv:2511.17364 (2025)

    Oh, S., Choe, J., Lee, D., Lee, D., Jeong, S., Wang, Y.C.F., Park, J.: SVRecon: Sparse voxel rasterization for surface reconstruction. arXiv:2511.17364 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  17. [17]

    In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (June 2024)

    Ranzinger, M., Heinrich, G., Molchanov, P., Kautz, J.: AM-RADIO: Agglomerative model - reduce all domains into one. In: IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (June 2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Sun, C., Choe, J., Loop, C., Ma, W.C., Wang, Y.C.F.: Sparse voxels rasterization: Real-time high-fidelity radiance field rendering. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Sun, C., Sun, M., Chen, H.: Direct voxel grid optimization: Super-fast convergence for radiance fields reconstruc- tion. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Tonderski, A., Lindström, C., Hess, G., Ljungbergh, W., Svensson, L., Petersson, C.: NeuRAD: Neural rendering for autonomous driving. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Turki, H., Ramanathan, J., Mahajan, R., Bi, Z., Isola, P., Deva, R.: SUDS: Scalable unbounded dynamic scenes. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023)

    2023

  22. [22]

    In: International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) (2026)

    WANG, F., Djeghim, H., Moutarde, F., Sidibé, D.: J-neus: Joint field optimization for neural surface reconstruc- tion in urban scenes with limited image overlap. In: International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) (2026)

    2026

  23. [23]

    In: International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) (2024)

    Wang, F., Louys, A., Piasco, N., Bennehar, M., Roldãao, L., Tsishkou, D.: Planerf: Svd unsupervised 3d plane regularization for nerf large-scale urban scene reconstruction. In: International Conference on 3D Vision (3DV) (2024)

    2024

  24. [24]

    arXiv:2604.01388 (2026)

    Wang, F., Piasco, N., Bennehar, M., Roldão, L., Tsishkou, D., Moutarde, F.: LESV: Language embedded sparse voxel fusion for open-vocabulary 3D scene understanding. arXiv:2604.01388 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  25. [25]

    In: IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) (2021)

    Xiao, P., Shao, Z., Hao, S., Zhang, Z., Chai, X., Jiao, J., Li, Z., Wu, J., Sun, K., Jiang, K., et al.: Pandaset: Advanced sensor suite dataset for autonomous driving. In: IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC) (2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2021)

    Xie, E., Wang, W., Yu, Z., Anandkumar, A., Alvarez, J.M., Luo, P.: Segformer: Simple and efficient design for semantic segmentation with transformers. In: Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2021)

    2021

  27. [27]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Yan, C., Qu, D., Xu, D., Zhao, B., Wang, Z., Wang, D., Li, X.: GS-SLAM: Dense visual slam with 3D gaussian splatting. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    In: Proc

    Yan, Y., Lin, H., Zhou, C., Wang, W., Sun, H., Zhan, K., Lang, X., Zhou, X., Peng, S.: Street gaussians: Modeling dynamic urban scenes with gaussian splatting. In: Proc. of the European Conf. on Computer Vision (ECCV) (2024)

    2024

  29. [29]

    In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2024)

    Yang, L., Kang, B., Huang, Z., Zhao, Z., Xu, X., Feng, J., Zhao, H.: Depth anything v2. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS) (2024)

    2024

  30. [30]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Yang, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Manivasagam, S., Ma, W.C., Yang, A.J., Urtasun, R.: UniSim: A neural closed-loop sensor simulator. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2023)

    2023

  31. [31]

    In: IEEE Conf

    Zhou, X., Lin, Z., Shan, X., Wang, Y., Sun, D., Yang, M.H.: DrivingGaussian: Composite gaussian splatting for surrounding dynamic autonomous driving scenes. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) (2024) DrivingVoxels 17 A Algorithmic Multi-Octree Render Our rendering pipeline handles a static background (Obg) and a dynamic sequen...

    2024