Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 57 references

Coupled spinor polariton condensates induce and synchronize each other's continuous time-crystal pseudospin oscillations.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Experimental demonstration that coherently and dissipatively coupled spinor polariton condensates synchronize their pseudospin dynamics in the continuous time crystal phase.

T0 review reviewed 2026-06-26 challenge →

load-bearing objection The paper reports an experimental demonstration of synchronization between two coupled polariton continuous time crystals, with power-tunable ferro and anti-ferro alignment of their pseudospin precession. the 1 major comments →

arxiv 2606.23311 v1 pith:V4YWU772 submitted 2026-06-22 cond-mat.other physics.optics

Synchronization in coherently and dissipatively coupled spinor polariton time crystals

I. Carraro-Haddad , A. Ramos-P\'erez , G. Usaj , A. Bruchhausen , K. Biermann , P. V. Santos , A. S. Kuznetsov , A. A. Reynoso
show 1 more author
A. Fainstein
This is my paper
classification cond-mat.other physics.optics
keywords polariton condensatescontinuous time crystalspseudospin synchronizationcoupled trapsexciton reservoirferro and anti-ferro configurationsGHz dynamics
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper investigates what occurs when continuous time crystals formed by spinor polariton condensates are placed in coupled traps. It demonstrates that the precessing pseudospins in each trap can mutually induce and synchronize their GHz dynamics. The relative alignment of these limit-cycle precessions can be switched between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic configurations by varying the optical excitation power. This relies on both coherent coupling and dissipative coupling through the shared exciton reservoir. Such synchronization extends the study of time-translation symmetry breaking to interacting non-Hermitian quantum systems.

Core claim

Polariton condensates in coupled traps exhibit mutual induction and synchronization of pseudospin temporal GHz dynamics in the continuous time-crystal phase. The individual and relative orientations of the precessing pseudospins are tunable by optical excitation power, resulting in both ferro and anti-ferro dynamical configurations. The exciton reservoir together with coherent and long-range dissipative inter-trap couplings are shown to be important for the CTC dynamics.

What carries the argument

The limit-cycle precessing pseudospins of spinor polariton condensates, coupled through coherent tunneling and long-range dissipative interactions mediated by the exciton reservoir.

Load-bearing premise

The observed GHz pseudospin oscillations and their synchronization specifically arise from the continuous time-crystal limit-cycle behavior induced by the coherent and dissipative couplings, rather than from unrelated driven-dissipative effects.

What would settle it

Measuring the pseudospin dynamics while increasing the distance between traps beyond the range of the long-range dissipative coupling and observing the disappearance of synchronization would test whether the couplings are responsible.

Watch this falsifier. Get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • Mutual induction of CTC behavior between adjacent traps
  • Power-tunable switch between ferro and anti-ferro synchronization states
  • Central role of the exciton reservoir in enabling the observed dynamics
  • Extension of time-translation symmetry breaking to non-Hermitian coupled systems

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This coupling mechanism suggests that synchronized oscillations could propagate across larger arrays of traps to produce collective modes.
  • Similar synchronization of limit-cycle dynamics may appear in other driven-dissipative systems that support continuous time crystals.
  • Varying trap separation while monitoring synchronization would directly map the spatial range of the dissipative coupling.
  • The approach opens routes to engineered collective behavior in lattices of nonlinear quantum condensates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally studies coupled spinor polariton condensates and reports mutual induction and synchronization of pseudospin GHz precession in the continuous time-crystal (CTC) phase. Individual and relative pseudospin orientations are tuned by optical pump power to realize ferro- and anti-ferro dynamical configurations. Theory is used to argue that the exciton reservoir together with coherent and long-range dissipative inter-trap couplings are essential for the observed CTC dynamics.

Significance. If the experimental data isolate the CTC limit-cycle mechanism as the origin of the tunable synchronization, the work would extend time-translation symmetry breaking to interacting non-Hermitian systems and provide a concrete platform for collective self-sustained dynamics in lattices of driven-dissipative condensates. The combination of tunable ferro/anti-ferro locking with explicit coupling terms is a potentially valuable contribution.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the observed GHz pseudospin oscillations and their synchronization arise specifically from CTC limit-cycle behavior (rather than reservoir depletion, spin-dependent gain saturation, or trap inhomogeneities) is load-bearing, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative criteria, error analysis, or control experiments that would exclude these alternative driven-dissipative mechanisms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for highlighting the importance of clearly distinguishing the continuous time-crystal mechanism in the abstract. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that the observed GHz pseudospin oscillations and their synchronization arise specifically from CTC limit-cycle behavior (rather than reservoir depletion, spin-dependent gain saturation, or trap inhomogeneities) is load-bearing, yet the abstract supplies no quantitative criteria, error analysis, or control experiments that would exclude these alternative driven-dissipative mechanisms.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract, as written, is too concise to convey the quantitative distinctions made in the full manuscript. The main text and supplementary material contain power-dependent frequency measurements with error bars, synchronization phase-locking metrics, and systematic variation of pump power and inter-trap distance that are used to exclude reservoir-depletion or simple gain-saturation scenarios; the theoretical model further isolates the necessity of both coherent and long-range dissipative couplings for the observed limit-cycle behavior. We will revise the abstract to include a brief statement of these distinguishing criteria and the role of the exciton reservoir. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations and supporting theory remain independent of self-referential inputs

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental study of synchronization in coupled polariton traps, with the central claims resting on measured GHz pseudospin dynamics and their power-tunable ferro/anti-ferro configurations. The theoretical component is described only as showing that the exciton reservoir plus coherent and dissipative couplings 'play important roles,' without any equations, fitted parameters, or predictions presented in the provided text that reduce to self-definition or input renaming. No self-citation chains, ansatz smuggling, or uniqueness theorems are invoked in the abstract or summary sections to close a derivation loop. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks (direct time-resolved measurements) and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the provided text.

reviewed 2026-06-26 · how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Synchronization in coherently and dissipatively coupled spinor polariton time crystals." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V4YWU772

@misc{pith2026260623311,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Synchronization in coherently and dissipatively coupled spinor polariton time crystals},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V4YWU772}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.23311}
}
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

The spinor degree of freedom associated to exciton-polariton condensates can spontaneously self-oscillate breaking time translation symmetry, thus showing a continuous time-crystal (CTC) behavior. An open question in such driven-dissipative and non-linear quantum open systems is what happens when CTCs are brought together to interact. Here we experimentally study polariton condensates in coupled traps, evidencing mutual induction and synchronization of the pseudospin temporal GHz dynamics in the CTC phase. The individual and relative orientation of the (limit cycle) precessing pseudospins can be tuned by the optical excitation power, displaying both ferro and anti-ferro dynamical configurations. We theoretically show that the exciton reservoir, and both the coherent and long-range dissipative inter-trap coupling, play important roles in the CTC dynamics. The investigation of time-broken symmetry is thus extended here to more complex non-hermitian systems opening the path to study self-sustained collective dynamics in lattices of non-linear quantum condensates.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23311 by A. A. Reynoso, A. Bruchhausen, A. Fainstein, A. Ramos-P\'erez, A. S. Kuznetsov, G. Usaj, I. Carraro-Haddad, K. Biermann, P. V. Santos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Spinor coupled time crystals with an internal clock. Experiments on two 4 × 4 µm 2 square polariton traps, separated by a small 1 µm barriers. A continuous wave linearly polarized pump laser non-resonantly injects free carriers with Pcw. These relax, forming an exciton reservoir mostly feeding one of the polariton traps. (a) Photoluminescence spectra integrated from the two traps for increasing non-resonan… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time dependence of the polaromechanical CTC molecule determined through g (1) (r, τ). (a) Spectrum integrated from the whole structure, corresponding to two coupled 2 × 2µm 2 square traps separated by 2µm. Frequencies are given respect to that of the most intense peak. Vertical lines are separated νM = 20 GHz. (b) Spectrally resolved spatial image corresponding to the spectrum in (a). (c) Time-dependent g … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dissipative coupling of a TC to a distant condensate. (a) Spectrally resolved spatial images for varying incidence power for a structure consisting of two 2 × 2µm 2 square traps separated by 2µm barriers (as the example in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Coherent and dissipative synchronization of two po￾lariton time crystals. (a,b) Precession frequency of the pseudospin limit cycle in each trap, ωLC, normalized to the mechanical fre￾quency ΩM, as a function of the average pump power P, for the pumping conditions and trap parameters given in the main text and Methods. The two curves correspond to the two spatially separated condensates (trap 1 and trap 2).… view at source ↗

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum time crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 160401 (2012)

    2012

  2. [2]

    Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: a no-go theorem, Phys

    P. Bruno, Impossibility of spontaneously rotating time crystals: a no-go theorem, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 070402 (2013)

    2013

  3. [3]

    Sacha, and J

    K. Sacha, and J. Zakrzewski, Time crystals: a review, Rep. Prog. Phys.81, 016401 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Kessler, P

    H. Kessler, P. Kongkhambut, C. Georges, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme , and A. Hemmerich, Observation of a Dissipative Time Crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 043602 (2021)

    2021

  5. [5]

    Autti, V

    S. Autti, V . B. Eltsov, and G. E. V olovik, Observation of a Time Quasicrystal and Its Transition to a Superfluid Time Crystal, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 215301 (2018)

    2018

  6. [6]

    Z. Gong, R. Hamazaki, and M. Ueda, Discrete Time-Crystalline Order in Cavity and Circuit QED Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.120, 040404 (2018)

    2018

  7. [7]

    Tucker, B

    K. Tucker, B. Zhu, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. Marino, F. Jimenez, J. G. Restrepo, and A.M. Rey, Shattered time: Can a dissipative time crystal survive many-body correlations? New J. Phys.20, 123003 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    B. Zhu, J. Marino, N. Y . Yao, M. D. Lukin, and E. A. Demler, Dicke time crystals in driven-dissipative quantum many-body systems, New J. Phys. 21, 073028 (2019)

    2019

  9. [9]

    B. Buca, J. Tindall, and D. Jaksch, Non-stationary coher- ent quantum many-body dynamics through dissipation, Nature Communications10, 1730 (2019)

    2019

  10. [10]

    Lazarides, S

    A. Lazarides, S. Roy, F. Piazza, and R. Moessner, R. Time crystallinity in dissipative Floquet systems, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 022002 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    D. V . Else, C. Monroe, C. Nayak, and N. Y . Yao, Discrete time crystals, Annu. Rev. Condens. Matter Phys.11, 467 (2020)

    2020

  12. [12]

    Zhang, P

    J. Zhang, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, A. Lee, J. Smith, G. Pagano, I.-D. Potirniche, A. C. Potter, A. Vishwanath, N. Y . Yao, and C. Monroe, Observation of a discrete time crys- tal, Nature543, 217 (2017)

    2017

  13. [13]

    Taheri, A

    H. Taheri, A. B. Matsko, L. Maleki, and Krzysztof Sacha, All- optical dissipative discrete time crystals, Nat. Comm.13, 848 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Frey, and S

    P. Frey, and S. Rachel, Realization of a discrete time crystal on 57 qubits of a quantum computer, Sci. Adv.8, eabm7652 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    Kessler, J

    H. Kessler, J. G. Cosme, M. Hemmerling, L. Mathey, and A. Hemmerich, Emergent limit cycles and time crystal dynamics in an atom-cavity system, Phys. Rev. A99, 053605 (2019)

    2019

  16. [16]

    Kongkhambut, J

    P. Kongkhambut, J. Skulte, L. Mathey, J. G. Cosme, A. Hem- merich, and H. Kessler, Observation of a continuous time crys- tal, Science377, 670 (2022)

    2022

  17. [17]

    Greilich, N

    A. Greilich, N. E. Kopteva, A. N. Kamenskii, P. S. Sokolov, V . L. Korenev, and M. Bayer, Robust continuous time crystal in an electron-nuclear spin system, Nature Physics20, 631 (2024)

    2024

  18. [18]

    Carraro-Haddad, D

    I. Carraro-Haddad, D. L. Chafatinos , A. S. Kuznetsov, I. A. Papuccio-Fern´andez , A. A. Reynoso , A. Bruchhausen, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, G. Usaj, and A. Fainstein, Solid-state continuous time crystal in a polariton condensate with a built-in mechanical clock, Science384, 995 (2024)

    2024

  19. [19]

    Iemini, A

    F. Iemini, A. Russomanno, J. Keeling, M. Schir´o, M. Dalmonte, and R. Fazio, Boundary Time Crystals, Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 035301 (2018)

    2018

  20. [20]

    Hajdu ˆsek, P

    M. Hajdu ˆsek, P. Solanki, R. Fazio, and S. Vinjanampathy, Seeding Crystallization in Time, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 080603 (2022)

    2022

  21. [21]

    Schir ´o, C

    M. Schir ´o, C. Joshi, M. Bordyuh, R. Fazio,J. Keeling, and H. E. T¨ureci, Exotic Attractors of the Nonequilibrium Rabi-Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.116, 143603 (2016)

    2016

  22. [22]

    Autti, P

    S. Autti, P. J. Heikkinen, J. T. M ¨akinen, G. E. V olovik, V . V . Zavjalov, and V . B. Eltsov, AC Josephson effect between two superfluid time crystals, Nature Mat.20, 171 (2021)

    2021

  23. [23]

    M. J. Hartmann, F. G. Brandao, and M. B. Plenio, Strongly interacting polaritons in coupled arrays of cavities, Nature Physics2, 849 (2006)

    2006

  24. [24]

    A. Amo, D. B. D. Sanvitto, F. Laussy, E. del Valle, M. Mar- tin, A. Lema ˆıtre, J. Bloch, D. Krizhanovskii, M. Skolnick, C. Tejedor, and L. Vi˜na, Collective Fluid Dynamics of a Polariton 10 Condensate in a Semiconductor Microcavity, Nature (London) 457, 291 (2009)

    2009

  25. [25]

    Carusotto, and C

    I. Carusotto, and C. Ciuti, Quantum fluids of light, Reviews of Modern Physics85, 299 (2013)

    2013

  26. [26]

    Rozas, A

    G. Rozas, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. Fainstein, B. Jusserand, and A. Lema ˆıtre, Polariton path to fully resonant disper- sive coupling in optomechanical resonators, Phys. Rev. B90, 201302(R) (2014)

    2014

  27. [27]

    Kasprzak, M

    J. Kasprzak, M. Richard, S. Kundermann, A. Baas, P. Jeam- brun, J. M. J. Keeling, F. M. Marchetti, M. H. Szyma ´nska, R. Andr´e, J. L. Staehli, V . Savona, P. B. Littlewood, B. Deveaud, and L. S. Dang, Bose-Einstein Condensation of Exciton Polari- tons, Nature (London)443, 409 (2006)

    2006

  28. [28]

    Balili, V

    R. Balili, V . Hartwell, D. Snoke , L. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Bose- Einstein Condensation of Microcavity Polaritons in a Trap, Sci- ence316, 1007 (2007)

    2007

  29. [29]

    Schneider, K

    C. Schneider, K. Winkler, M. D. Fraser, M. Kamp, Y . Ya- mamoto, E. A. Ostrovskaya, and S. H ¨ofling, Exciton-polariton trapping and potential landscape engineering, Rep. Prog. Phys. 80, 016503 (2016)

    2016

  30. [30]

    Bajoni, P

    D. Bajoni, P. Senellart, E. Wertz, I. Sagnes, A. Miard, A. Lemaˆıtre, and J. Bloch, Polariton Laser Using Single Micropil- lar GaAs-GaAlAs, Semiconductor CavitiesPhys. Rev. Lett. 100, 047401 (2008)

    2008

  31. [31]

    Galbiati, L

    M. Galbiati, L. Ferrier, D. D. Solnyshkov, D. Tanese, E. Wertz, A. Amo, M. Abbarchi, P. Senellart, I. Sagnes, A. Lema ˆıtre, E. Galopin, G. Malpuech, and J. Bloch, Polariton Condensation in Photonic Molecules, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 126403 (2012)

    2012

  32. [32]

    Askitopoulos, H

    A. Askitopoulos, H. Ohadi, A. V . Kavokin, Z. Hatzopoulos, P. G. Savvidis, and P. G. Lagoudakis, Polariton condensation in an optically induced two-dimensional potential, Phys. Rev. B88, 041308(R) (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    Cristofolini, A

    P. Cristofolini, A. Dreismann, G. Christmann, G. Franchetti, N. G. Berloff, P. Tsotsis, Z. Hatzopoulos, P. G. Savvidis, and J. J. Baumberg, Optical Superfluid Phase Transitions and Trapping of Polariton Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 186403 (2013)

    2013

  34. [34]

    Alyatkin, H

    S. Alyatkin, H. Sigurdsson, A. Askitopoulos, J. D. T ¨opfer, and P. G. Lagoudakis, Quantum fluids of light in all-optical scatterer lattices, Nature Communications12, 5571 (2021)

    2021

  35. [35]

    Winkler, J

    K. Winkler, J. Fischer, A. Schade, M. Amthor, Robert Dall, Jonas Gessler, M. Emmerling, E. A. Ostrovskaya, M. Kamp, C. Schneider, and S. H¨ofling, A polariton condensate in a photonic crystal potential landscape, New J. Phys.17, 023001 (2015)

    2015

  36. [36]

    A. S. Kuznetsov, P. L. J. Helgers, K. Biermann, and P. V . San- tos, Quantum Confinement of Exciton-Polaritons in Structured (Al,Ga)As Microcavity, Phys. Rev. B97, 195309 (2018)

    2018

  37. [37]

    Fainstein, N

    A. Fainstein, N. D. Lanzillotti-Kimura, B. Jusserand, B. Perrin, Strong optical-mechanical coupling in a vertical GaAs/AlAs microcavity for subterahertz phonons and near-infrared light, Physical Review Letters110, 037403 (2013)

    2013

  38. [38]

    P. V . Santos and A. Fainstein, Polaromechanics: polariton- ics meets optomechanics, Optical Materials Express13, 1974 (2023)

    1974

  39. [39]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity Op- tomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  40. [40]

    D. L. Chafatinos, A. S. Kuznetsov, S. Anguiano, A. E. Bruch- hausen, A. A. Reynoso, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, and A. Fainstein, Polariton-driven phonon laser, Nature Communica- tions11, 4552 (2020)

    2020

  41. [41]

    A. A. Reynoso, G. Usaj, D. L. Chafatinos, F. Mangussi, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. S. Kuznetsov, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, and A. Fainstein, Optomechanical parametric oscillation of a quan- tum light-fluid in a lattice, Phys. Rev. B105, 195310 (2022)

    2022

  42. [42]

    D. L. Chafatinos, A. S. Kuznetsov, P. Sesin, I. Papuccio, A. A. Reynoso, A. E. Bruchhausen, G. Usaj, K. Biermann, P V . Santos, A. Fainstein, Asynchronous Locking in Metamaterials of Fluids of Light and Sound, Nature Communications14, 3485 (2023)

    2023

  43. [43]

    I. A. Ramos-P ´erez, I. Carraro-Haddad, F. Fainstein, D. L. Chafatinos, G. Usaj, G. B. Mindlin, A. Fainstein, and A. A. Reynoso, Theory of optomechanical locking in driven- dissipative coupled polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. B109, 165305 (2024)

    2024

  44. [44]

    A. V . Nalitov, H. Sigurdsson, S. Morina, Y . S. Krivosenko, I. V . Iorsh, Y . G. Rubo, A. V . Kavokin, and I. A. Shelykh, Opti- cally trapped polariton condensates as semiclassical time crys- tals, Phys. Rev. B99, 033830 (2019)

    2019

  45. [45]

    Wouters and I

    M. Wouters and I. Carusotto, Excitations in a Nonequilibrium Bose-Einstein Condensate of Exciton Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 140402 (2007)

    2007

  46. [46]

    I. A. Shelykh, A. V . Kavokin, and G. Malpuech, Spin dynamics of exciton polaritons in microcavities, phys. stat. sol. (b) 242, 2271 (2005)

    2005

  47. [47]

    Ohadi, A

    H. Ohadi, A. Dreismann, Y . G. Rubo, F. Pinsker, Y . del Valle- Inclan Redondo, S. I. Tsintzos, Z. Hatzopoulos, P. G. Savvidis, and J. J. Baumberg, Spontaneous Spin Bifurcations and Ferro- magnetic Phase Transitions in a Spinor Exciton-Polariton Con- densate, Phys. Rev. X5, 031002 (2015)

    2015

  48. [48]

    Gnusov, H

    I. Gnusov, H. Sigurdsson , S. Baryshev, T. Ermatov, A. Aski- topoulos, and P. G. Lagoudakis, Optical orientation, polariza- tion pinning, and depolarization dynamics in optically confined polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. B102, 125419 (2020)

    2020

  49. [49]

    Sigurdsson, Hysteresis in linearly polarized nonresonantly driven exciton-polariton condensates, Phys

    H. Sigurdsson, Hysteresis in linearly polarized nonresonantly driven exciton-polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. Res.2, 023323 (2020)

    2020

  50. [50]

    Ohadi, A

    H. Ohadi, A. J. Ramsay, H. Sigurdsson, Y . del Valle-Inclan Re- dondo, S. I. Tsintzos, Z. Hatzopoulos, T. C. H. Liew, I. A. She- lykh, Y . G. Rubo, P.G. Savvidis, and J. J. Baumberg, Spin Or- der and Phase Transitions in Chains of Polariton Condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett.textbf119, 067401 (2017)

    2017

  51. [51]

    Sigurdsson, A

    H. Sigurdsson, A. J. Ramsay, H. Ohadi, Y . G. Rubo, T. C. H. Liew, J. J. Baumberg, and I. A. Shelykh, Driven-dissipative spin chain model based on exciton-polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. B96, 155403 (2017)

    2017

  52. [52]

    Rayanov, B

    K. Rayanov, B. L. Altshuler, Y . G. Rubo, and S. Flach, Fre- quency Combs with Weakly Lasing Exciton-Polariton Conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 193901 (2015)

    2015

  53. [53]

    Wouters, Synchronized and desynchronized phases of cou- pled nonequilibrium exciton-polariton condensates, Physical Review B77, 121302 (2008)

    M. Wouters, Synchronized and desynchronized phases of cou- pled nonequilibrium exciton-polariton condensates, Physical Review B77, 121302 (2008)

    2008

  54. [54]

    I. L. Aleiner, B. L. Altshuler, and Y . G. Rubo, Radiative cou- pling and weak lasing of exciton-polariton condensates, Phys. Rev. B85, 121301(R) (2012)

    2012

  55. [55]

    Carlon Zambon, Z

    N. Carlon Zambon, Z. Denis, R. De Oliveira, S. Ravets, C. Ciuti, I. Favero, and J. Bloch, Enhanced Cavity Optomechanics with Quantum-Well Exciton Polaritons, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 093603 (2022)

    2022

  56. [56]

    Sesin, A

    P. Sesin, A. S. Kuznetsov, G. Rozas, S. Anguiano, A. E. Bruchhausen, A. Lemaˆıtre, K. Biermann, P. V . Santos, and A. Fainstein, Giant optomechanical coupling and dephasing pro- tection with cavity exciton-polaritons, Phys. Rev. Research5, L042035 (2023)

    2023

  57. [57]

    Takeda, W

    M. Takeda, W. Wang, Z. Duan, and Y . Miyamoto, Coherence holography, Optics Express13, 9629–9635 (2005)

    2005

This paper was first reviewed by grok-4.3 on June 26, 2026.