pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23802 · v1 · pith:52AQBANOnew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Characterising magnetic fields at the onset of star cluster formation: From giant molecular clouds to infrared dark clumps

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords magnetic fieldsinfrared dark clumpsmolecular cloudsstar formationpolarizationvelocity gradientsB-field strength
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic field morphologies differ systematically between infrared dark clumps and their parent molecular clouds.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper maps the plane-of-sky magnetic field structures in eight infrared dark clumps and the larger giant molecular clouds that contain them, using Planck and JCMT POL-2 polarization observations. It reports that the field orientations change markedly from cloud scales of tens of parsecs down to clump scales of a few parsecs, confirmed after applying a velocity-gradient correction for the line-of-sight component. A clear correlation emerges between gas velocity dispersion and how well the magnetic field aligns with column-density gradients across these scales. The measured field strengths are higher on the cloud scale than on the clump scale, violating simple flux conservation and indicating that such strength estimates are unreliable. The overall picture is that magnetic fields supply support against collapse on the larger cloud scales but exert little dynamical influence inside the cluster-forming clumps themselves.

Core claim

The morphologies of magnetic fields in clumps and their parent molecular clouds systematically and significantly differ, supported by a line-of-sight correction of the cloud-scale magnetic fields using the velocity gradient technique. A strong correlation exists between gas velocity dispersion and the alignment of magnetic field lines with column density gradients from tens of parsecs to a few parsecs. Higher magnetic field strengths measured on cloud scale than on clump scale contradict magnetic flux conservation and highlight the unreliability of such measurements. The analysis supports a picture in which magnetic fields have little impact on the dynamical evolution of cluster-forming clum

What carries the argument

Plane-of-sky magnetic field morphologies derived from Planck and JCMT POL-2 dust polarization data, with velocity gradient technique supplying the line-of-sight correction to compare cloud and clump scales.

Load-bearing premise

The velocity gradient technique supplies an accurate line-of-sight correction for cloud-scale fields and the polarization measurements trace the true plane-of-sky field morphology without dominant projection or contamination effects.

What would settle it

A set of observations in which the magnetic field morphologies in clumps and clouds remain statistically similar after independent line-of-sight corrections, or in which measured field strengths on both scales satisfy magnetic flux conservation within uncertainties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23802 by Gary A. Fuller, Nicolas Peretto, Patrick M. Koch, Ria Ramkumar, Ya-Wen Tang.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: a) Planck magnetic field pseudovectors (in black and all of the same arbitrary length; not colour-coded or scaled) within the parent molecular cloud of SDC34.370 (black contour). The outline of the POL-2 intensity image (red contour) of SDC34.370 is overlaid on the Planck intensity image to show the relative position of the JCMT scanning area. The Planck beam size is depicted as a white circle in the botto… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Histograms of 𝜃𝐵 for each clump and its parent cloud. A vertical blue line marks the average angle of Planck pseudovectors falling within the boundary of the clump. Numbers in corresponding colours to the histograms give the minimum number of independent measurements that contribute to the given histogram. MNRAS 000, 1–24 (2026) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Circular means of the Planck (𝑥−axis) and smoothed POL-2 (𝑦−axis) magnetic field directions. Diamond symbols represent the aver￾age 𝜃𝐵 for the whole cloud from Planck measurements and filled circular symbols represent the average of the Planck pseudovectors falling within the clump boundary. Dashed lines depict a 1:1 relation (opaque black) between the two (i.e. the Planck and smoothed POL-2 mean direction… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: a) The magnetic field pseudovectors (in pale blue) obtained from applying the VChGs method on SDC34.370, including the full velocity range of the 13CO(1-0) PPV cube. b) The match of the VChGs pseudovectors (pale blue segments) shown in Figure 4a to the Planck pseudovectors (black segments), where the colorbar shows the difference in angle between the VGT pseudovector and the Planck pseudovector in that pix… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: shows the equivalent plot to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The difference in the average magnetic field angles within the clouds from Planck and the VGT. A dashed horizontal black line shows a difference of 0◦ , fainter dashed black lines show ±15◦ difference. Diamond symbols represent the difference in circular mean angle of the magnetic field within the whole cloud, while filled circles represent the difference between the circular mean of the vectors falling wi… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: HRO alignment measures for the clouds (blue) and clumps (red). Each point spans the range of column densities over which the AM was calculated. Dotted grey lines depict the best-fit line to the points, weighted by their errors. The equation of the best-fit line and the unweighted Pearson correlation coefficient (r) along with its associated p-value are provided in the bottom left and bottom right corners r… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: 𝐵POS values calculated for our sample using the classical DCF, sin￾DCF, ST, ADF, and corrected ADF (with the CY16 𝑁LOS values) methods, against the H2 column density of the bounding contour of each clump or cloud. spective importance can be assessed. As discussed in the previous section, the estimates of the magnetic field strength for our sample - as for any 𝐵-field strength derived from polarised emissio… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ratios between the gravitational, turbulent, and magnetic energy densities in the clumps and clouds. Horizontal dashed brown lines mark where each of the quantities is equal to 1. The 𝑥-axis of each plot is the H2 column density of the bounding contour of each clump or cloud. Errorbars show the 68% confidence interval based on the uncertainties in the intrinsic values used to calculate each ratio [PITH_FU… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The magnetic virial parameters of the clumps and clouds. A horizontal dashed brown line demarcates 𝑎mag = 1. The 𝑥-axis of each plot is the H2 column density of the bounding contour of each clump or cloud. The colour scheme is the same as that for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: shows the relationship between 𝛾𝛿𝑣 = 𝛿𝑣cloud/𝛿𝑣clump and the difference in the average AMs from the HRO analysis, ΔAM = AMcloud - AMclump, within the whole cloud or clump. A positive correlation is evident, where the difference between the cloud’s and clump’s average AMs increases - corresponding to a more perpen￾dicular relative alignment of the 𝐵-field and density structure in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figu… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The difference in the average AMs from the HRO analysis within each clump and its parent molecular cloud versus the factor between the cloud’s and clump’s virial ratios. Marker size is correlated with the mass of the clump for each source. clump compared to the cloud - with the factor between the velocity dispersions of the cloud and clump. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_12.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The role of magnetic fields in the observed inefficiency of star formation in Galactic molecular clouds is a widely debated topic, with the past decade seeing an explosion of observational characterisation of magnetic fields in star-forming regions. However, few have studied the spatial evolution of magnetic fields from entire molecular clouds down to parsec-size cluster-forming clumps. In this work, the plane-of-sky morphology of the magnetic fields of eight infrared dark clumps and their parent molecular clouds are derived from Planck and JCMT POL-2 polarisation data (including some from the BISTRO survey). We also use this data to test multiple methods of calculating B-field strengths. Our study shows that the morphologies of magnetic fields in clumps and their parent molecular clouds systematically, and significantly, differ, supported by a line-of-sight correction of the cloud-scale magnetic fields using the velocity gradient technique. We find a strong correlation between gas velocity dispersion and the alignment of magnetic field lines with column density gradients from scales of tens of parsecs to a few parsecs. This correlation is clear evidence of a link between the kinematic properties of the gas and the dynamical importance of magnetic fields. Conversely, the higher magnetic field strengths we measure on cloud scale compared to clump scale contradict magnetic flux conservation and thus highlight the unreliability of such measurements. Altogether, our analysis supports a picture in which magnetic fields have little impact on the dynamical evolution of cluster-forming clumps but do play a role in providing support on larger scales.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes the plane-of-sky magnetic field morphologies in eight infrared dark clumps and their parent giant molecular clouds using Planck and JCMT POL-2 polarization data. It applies the velocity gradient technique (VGT) to correct for line-of-sight effects at cloud scales and reports that the morphologies differ systematically and significantly between scales. A correlation is found between gas velocity dispersion and the alignment of magnetic fields with column density gradients. B-field strength estimates are tested but found to contradict flux conservation on cloud scales, leading to the conclusion that magnetic fields support larger scales but have little dynamical impact on clump scales.

Significance. If the VGT-based correction is robust, the results would strengthen the case for scale-dependent roles of magnetic fields in regulating star formation, particularly by providing support against collapse on molecular cloud scales while being less influential in cluster-forming clumps. The correlation with kinematics offers a potential observational link between turbulence and magnetic field dynamics.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract (line-of-sight correction paragraph)] The central claim that morphologies 'systematically and significantly differ' (abstract) is supported only after applying the VGT line-of-sight correction to cloud-scale fields. The manuscript must demonstrate that VGT yields unbiased inclinations in these IRDC environments, e.g., via forward-modelled synthetic observations or cross-checks with independent tracers, because unresolved velocity gradients or shock kinematics could introduce systematic projection artifacts that erase the reported difference.
  2. [Abstract (B-field strength tests)] The same data-reduction and projection issues that lead the authors to reject their own cloud-scale B-strength estimates on flux-conservation grounds (abstract) may also affect the VGT-derived orientations used for the morphology comparison; a quantitative assessment of whether these systematics are independent is required.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states a 'strong correlation' between velocity dispersion and B-field alignment but supplies no sample statistics, error bars, or significance values; these must be reported explicitly in the results section.
  2. Clarify the precise procedure for combining Planck and JCMT data and any assumptions about polarization fraction or contamination that could affect the claimed morphology differences.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below, indicating planned revisions where appropriate to improve the clarity and robustness of the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Abstract (line-of-sight correction paragraph)] The central claim that morphologies 'systematically and significantly differ' (abstract) is supported only after applying the VGT line-of-sight correction to cloud-scale fields. The manuscript must demonstrate that VGT yields unbiased inclinations in these IRDC environments, e.g., via forward-modelled synthetic observations or cross-checks with independent tracers, because unresolved velocity gradients or shock kinematics could introduce systematic projection artifacts that erase the reported difference.

    Authors: We agree that the reliability of the VGT correction is central to the reported scale-dependent difference in morphologies. The VGT is applied following established procedures validated in prior studies of molecular clouds. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant methods and discussion sections to include additional justification for its use in IRDC environments, referencing supporting literature on its performance in regions with comparable densities and kinematics. We will also explicitly discuss the possible influence of unresolved velocity gradients and shock-driven motions as a caveat, while noting that the strong observed correlation between velocity dispersion and magnetic field–density gradient alignment across scales offers indirect empirical support for the VGT orientations. Performing dedicated forward-modelled synthetic observations lies outside the scope of this observational paper; the revision will therefore be partial and focused on textual clarification and caveats rather than new simulations. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Abstract (B-field strength tests)] The same data-reduction and projection issues that lead the authors to reject their own cloud-scale B-strength estimates on flux-conservation grounds (abstract) may also affect the VGT-derived orientations used for the morphology comparison; a quantitative assessment of whether these systematics are independent is required.

    Authors: We thank the referee for highlighting this possible overlap. The cloud-scale B-field strength estimates that contradict flux conservation were obtained with the Davis-Chandrasekhar-Fermi method, which depends on the dispersion of polarization position angles. The VGT, by contrast, infers orientations from velocity gradients measured in spectral-line data and rests on different physical assumptions. The flux-conservation inconsistency is therefore interpreted as a limitation of the DCF assumptions rather than a data-reduction artifact common to the polarization maps. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new paragraph in the discussion that provides a qualitative assessment (and limited quantitative comparison where the data permit) of the independence of the two techniques, clarifying why projection or reduction effects affecting DCF strength estimates do not directly compromise the velocity-gradient directions. This will constitute a partial revision consisting of added explanatory text. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: direct observational comparison of B-field morphologies

full rationale

The paper derives its central claims (systematic morphology differences between cloud and clump scales, velocity-dispersion correlation, and B-strength unreliability) from direct application of Planck/JCMT polarization data plus the standard velocity-gradient technique for line-of-sight correction. No equations redefine a fitted parameter as a prediction, no self-citation chain supplies a uniqueness theorem or ansatz, and the flux-conservation contradiction is presented as evidence against the measurements rather than as a derived result. The analysis is therefore self-contained against the input datasets.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the work rests on standard assumptions of polarization tracing magnetic fields and the validity of the velocity gradient technique for line-of-sight correction.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5812 in / 1202 out tokens · 32548 ms · 2026-06-26T07:44:27.789763+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

155 extracted references · 151 canonical work pages · 58 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    , keywords =

    Star cluster progenitors are dynamically decoupled from their parent molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad2453 , archivePrefix =. 2305.02701 , primaryClass =

  2. [2]

    Planck intermediate results. XIX. An overview of the polarized thermal emission from Galactic dust. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201424082 , archivePrefix =. 1405.0871 , primaryClass =

  3. [3]

    , year = 1953, month = jul, volume =

    Magnetic Fields in Spiral Arms. , year = 1953, month = jul, volume =. doi:10.1086/145731 , adsurl =

  4. [4]

    Magnetic Field Strength Maps for Molecular Clouds: A New Method Based on a Polarization - Intensity Gradient Relation

    Magnetic Field Strength Maps for Molecular Clouds: A New Method Based on a Polarization-Intensity Gradient Relation. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/79 , archivePrefix =. 1201.4263 , primaryClass =

  5. [5]

    Velocity Gradients as a Tracer for Magnetic Fields

    Velocity Gradients as a Tracer for Magnetic Fields. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/41 , archivePrefix =. 1608.06867 , primaryClass =

  6. [6]

    Physical Review , year = 1951, month = mar, volume =

    The Strength of Interstellar Magnetic Fields. Physical Review , year = 1951, month = mar, volume =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.81.890.2 , adsurl =

  7. [7]

    and Cole, Shaun and Eisenstein, Daniel J

    Radiative torques: analytical model and basic properties. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11817.x , archivePrefix =. 0707.0886 , primaryClass =

  8. [8]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    Submillimeter and Far-infrared Polarimetric Observations of Magnetic Fields in Star-Forming Regions. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00015 , archivePrefix =. 1904.04826 , primaryClass =

  9. [9]

    Elia and S

    D. Elia and S. Molinari and E. Schisano and J. D. Soler and M. Merello and D. Russeil and M. Veneziani and A. Zavagno and A. Noriega-Crespo and L. Olmi and M. Benedettini and P. Hennebelle and R. S. Klessen and S. Leurini and R. Paladini and S. Pezzuto and A. Traficante and D. J. Eden and P. G. Martin and M. Sormani and A. Coletta and T. Colman and R. Plu...

  10. [10]

    The present-day star formation rate of the Milky-Way determined from Spitzer detected young stellar objects

    The Present-Day Star Formation Rate of the Milky Way Determined from Spitzer-Detected Young Stellar Objects. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/710/1/L11 , archivePrefix =. 1001.3672 , primaryClass =

  11. [11]

    Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =

    Magnetic Fields in Star Formation: from Clouds to Cores. Protostars and Planets VII , year = 2023, editor =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2203.11179 , archivePrefix =. 2203.11179 , primaryClass =

  12. [12]

    , keywords =

    Velocity Gradient in the Presence of Self-gravity: Identifying Gravity-induced Inflow and Determining Collapsing Stage. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab9948 , archivePrefix =. 2002.06754 , primaryClass =

  13. [13]

    and Federrath, Christoph , TITLE=

    Krumholz, Mark R. and Federrath, Christoph , TITLE=. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , VOLUME=. 2019 , URL=. doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00007 , ISSN=

  14. [14]

    , year = 1956, month = jan, volume =

    Star formation in magnetic dust clouds. , year = 1956, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/116.5.503 , adsurl =

  15. [15]

    Ambipolar Diffusion, Cloud Cores, and Star Formation: Two-dimensional, Cylindrically Symmetric Contraction. I. The Issues, Formulation of the Problem, and Method of Solution. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/169893 , adsurl =

  16. [16]

    S. J. Desch and Telemachos Ch. Mouschovias , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1086/319703 , url =

  17. [17]

    Kunz and Telemachos Ch

    Matthew W. Kunz and Telemachos Ch. Mouschovias , title =. The Astrophysical Journal , abstract =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/2/1895 , url =

  18. [18]

    , keywords =

    Pressure-confined Clumps in Magnetized Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/171638 , adsurl =

  19. [19]

    Tracing interstellar magnetic field using the velocity gradient technique in shock and self-gravitating media

    Tracing interstellar magnetic field using the velocity gradient technique in shock and self-gravitating media. arXiv e-prints , keywords =. doi:10.48550/arXiv.1703.03026 , archivePrefix =. 1703.03026 , primaryClass =

  20. [20]

    Tracing magnetic fields with spectroscopic channel maps

    Tracing Magnetic Fields with Spectroscopic Channel Maps. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aaa241 , archivePrefix =. 1703.03119 , primaryClass =

  21. [21]

    Improving the Accuracy of Magnetic Field Tracing by Velocity Gradients: Principal Component Analysis

    Improving the accuracy of magnetic field tracing by velocity gradients: principal component analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1807 , archivePrefix =. 1802.08772 , primaryClass =

  22. [22]

    H., Lazarian, V ., et al

    Magnetic field morphology in interstellar clouds with the velocity gradient technique. Nature Astronomy , keywords =. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0769-0 , archivePrefix =. 2002.09948 , primaryClass =

  23. [23]

    , keywords =

    Models of Massive Molecular Clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/181613 , adsurl =

  24. [24]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    2a Results: galaxy to cloud scales. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2023.1272771 , archivePrefix =. 2312.01854 , primaryClass =

  25. [25]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =

    Whitworth, David J and Smith, Rowan J and Klessen, Ralf S and Mac Low, Mordecai-Mark and Glover, Simon C O and Tress, Robin and Pakmor, Rüdiger and Soler, Juan D , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad105 , url =

  26. [26]

    An Imprint of Molecular Cloud Magnetization in the Morphology of the Dust Polarized Emission

    An Imprint of Molecular Cloud Magnetization in the Morphology of the Dust Polarized Emission. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/774/2/128 , archivePrefix =. 1303.1830 , primaryClass =

  27. [27]

    , year =

    Li, Pak Shing and Klein, Richard I. , year =. Magnetized Interstellar Molecular Clouds -. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz653 , urldate =

  28. [28]

    The initial conditions for stellar protocluster formation. III. The Herschel counterparts of the Spitzer Dark Cloud catalogue. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201527064 , archivePrefix =. 1602.03234 , primaryClass =

  29. [29]

    Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =

    Magnetic field properties in star formation: A review of their analysis methods and interpretation. Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences , keywords =. doi:10.3389/fspas.2022.943556 , archivePrefix =. 2208.06492 , primaryClass =

  30. [30]

    , keywords =

    The JCMT BISTRO-3 Survey: Variation of Magnetic Field Orientations on Parsec and Subparsec Scales in the Massive Star-forming Region G28.34+0.06. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adce80 , adsurl =

  31. [31]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic Fields in the Infrared Dark Cloud G34.43+0.24. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab39dd , archivePrefix =. 1908.03624 , primaryClass =

  32. [32]

    Gravity, Magnetic Field, and Turbulence: Relative Importance and Impact on Fragmentation in the Infrared Dark Cloud G34.43+00.24

    Gravity, Magnetic Field, and Turbulence: Relative Importance and Impact on Fragmentation in the Infrared Dark Cloud G34.43+00.24. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1484 , archivePrefix =. 1903.12397 , primaryClass =

  33. [33]

    , year = 2012, month = sep, volume =

    Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds. , year = 2012, month = sep, volume =. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514 , adsurl =

  34. [34]

    , keywords =

    Formation of the Hub-Filament System G33.92+0.11: Local Interplay between Gravity, Velocity, and Magnetic Field. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/abc74e , archivePrefix =. 2011.01555 , primaryClass =

  35. [35]

    , keywords =

    Understanding the relative importance of magnetic field, gravity, and turbulence in star formation at the hub of the giant molecular cloud G148.24+00.41. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae053 , archivePrefix =. 2401.05310 , primaryClass =

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Dark Dragon Breaks Magnetic Chain: Dynamical Substructures of IRDC G28.34 Form in Supported Environments. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad3105 , archivePrefix =. 2403.03437 , primaryClass =

  37. [37]

    , keywords =

    The Magnetic Field in Quiescent Star-forming Filament G16.96+0.27. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad8912 , archivePrefix =. 2410.15913 , primaryClass =

  38. [38]

    , keywords =

    From filament to clumps and cores: A multiscale study of fragmentation and the role of the magnetic field and gas velocity in the infrared dark cloud SDC18.624-0.070. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452974 , adsurl =

  39. [39]

    A holistic perspective on the dynamics of G035.39-00.33: the interplay between gas and magnetic fields

    A Holistic Perspective on the Dynamics of G035.39-00.33: The Interplay between Gas and Magnetic Fields. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aac025 , archivePrefix =. 1803.09457 , primaryClass =

  40. [40]

    , keywords =

    Filamentary Network and Magnetic Field Structures Revealed with BISTRO in the High-mass Star-forming Region NGC 2264: Global Properties and Local Magnetogravitational Configurations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad165b , archivePrefix =. 2401.12728 , primaryClass =

  41. [41]

    Planck intermediate results. XXXII. The relative orientation between the magnetic field and structures traced by interstellar dust. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201425044 , archivePrefix =. 1409.6728 , primaryClass =

  42. [42]

    Relative Alignment Between the Magnetic Field and Molecular Gas Structure in the Vela C Giant Molecular Cloud using Low and High Density Tracers

    Relative Alignment between the Magnetic Field and Molecular Gas Structure in the Vela C Giant Molecular Cloud Using Low- and High-density Tracers. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb0 , archivePrefix =. 1804.08979 , primaryClass =

  43. [43]

    , keywords =

    Using Herschel and Planck observations to delineate the role of magnetic fields in molecular cloud structure. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201935779 , archivePrefix =. 1909.04862 , primaryClass =

  44. [44]

    , keywords =

    Mapping and characterizing magnetic fields in the Rho Ophiuchus-A molecular cloud with SOFIA/HAWC+. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348008 , archivePrefix =. 2408.17122 , primaryClass =

  45. [45]

    The Magnetic Field in the

    Be. The Magnetic Field in the. 2024 , month = apr, journal =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348376 , urldate =

  46. [46]

    Dust spectrum and polarisation at 850 um in the massive IRDC G035.39-00.33

    Dust spectrum and polarisation at 850 m in the massive IRDC G035.39-00.33. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833245 , archivePrefix =. 1809.00864 , primaryClass =

  47. [47]

    and Xie, Jinjin and Jiao, Sihan and Yang, Aiyuan and Koch, Patrick M

    Shen, Xianjin and Liu, Hong-Li and Ren, Zhiyuan and Tej, Anandmayee and Li, Di and Liu, Hauyu Baobab and Fuller, Gary A. and Xie, Jinjin and Jiao, Sihan and Yang, Aiyuan and Koch, Patrick M. and Xu, Fengwei and Sanhueza, Patricio and Diep, Pham Ngoc and Peretto, Nicolas and Yadav, R. K. and Kramer, Busaba H. and Sugiyama, Koichiro and Rawlings, Mark G. an...

  48. [48]

    Dispersion of Magnetic Fields in Molecular Clouds. II. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1504 , archivePrefix =. 0909.5227 , primaryClass =

  49. [49]

    Calibrating the

    Liu, Junhao and Zhang, Qizhou and Commer. Calibrating the. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cec , urldate =

  50. [50]

    Cho, Jungyeon and Yoo, Hyunju , year = 2016, month = apr, journal =. A. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/821/1/21 , urldate =

  51. [51]

    and Kauffmann, J

    Pillai, T. and Kauffmann, J. and Tan, J. C. and Goldsmith, P. F. and Carey, S. J. and Menten, K. M. , year = 2015, month = jan, journal =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/74 , urldate =

  52. [52]

    , keywords =

    High-accuracy estimation of magnetic field strength in the interstellar medium from dust polarization. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039779 , archivePrefix =. 2010.15141 , primaryClass =

  53. [53]

    Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models

    Density, Velocity, and Magnetic Field Structure in Turbulent Molecular Cloud Models. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/318290 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0008454 , primaryClass =

  54. [54]

    Barnes, A. T. and Liu, J. and Zhang, Q. and Tan, J. C. and Bigiel, F. and Caselli, P. and Cosentino, G. and Fontani, F. and Henshaw, J. D. and. Mother of Dragons. Astronomy and Astrophysics , volume =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202245668 , urldate =

  55. [55]

    and Skalidis, Raphael and Morgan, Larry and Xu, Duo and

    Law, Chi-Yan and Tan, Jonathan C. and Skalidis, Raphael and Morgan, Larry and Xu, Duo and. Polarized. The Astrophysical Journal , volume =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad39e0 , urldate =

  56. [56]

    , keywords =

    HAWC+/SOFIA Polarimetry in L1688: Relative Orientation of Magnetic Field and Elongated Cloud Structure. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac0cf2 , archivePrefix =. 2106.13795 , primaryClass =

  57. [57]

    , keywords =

    Multi-scale Physical Properties of NGC 6334 as Revealed by Local Relative Orientations between Magnetic Fields, Density Gradients, Velocity Gradients, and Gravity. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb540 , archivePrefix =. 2211.00152 , primaryClass =

  58. [58]

    Planck intermediate results. XXXV. Probing the role of the magnetic field in the formation of structure in molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201525896 , archivePrefix =. 1502.04123 , primaryClass =

  59. [59]

    , keywords =

    Relative alignment between dense molecular cores and ambient magnetic field: the synergy of numerical models and observations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa835 , archivePrefix =. 2003.11033 , primaryClass =

  60. [60]

    , keywords =

    Relative alignment between gas structures and magnetic field in Orion A at different scales using different molecular gas tracers. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202449182 , archivePrefix =. 2403.04274 , primaryClass =

  61. [61]

    , keywords =

    Relative alignments between magnetic fields, velocity gradients, and dust emission gradients in NGC 1333. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1829 , archivePrefix =. 2407.18375 , primaryClass =

  62. [62]

    , keywords =

    SOFIA and ALMA Investigate Magnetic Fields and Gas Structures in Massive Star Formation: The Case of the Masquerading Monster in BYF 73. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acac27 , archivePrefix =. 2301.03618 , primaryClass =

  63. [63]

    SF2A-2023: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics , year = 2023, editor =

    Statistical analysis of the relative orientations between filaments and magnetic fields in star forming regions. SF2A-2023: Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the French Society of Astronomy and Astrophysics , year = 2023, editor =

  64. [64]

    The link between magnetic fields and filamentary clouds II: Bimodal linear mass distributions

    The link between magnetic fields and filamentary clouds - II. Bimodal linear mass distributions. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz244 , archivePrefix =. 1906.09760 , primaryClass =

  65. [65]

    Towards a comprehensive scenario

    Global hierarchical collapse in molecular clouds. Towards a comprehensive scenario. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2736 , archivePrefix =. 1903.11247 , primaryClass =

  66. [66]

    , keywords =

    Self-similar collapse of isothermal spheres and star formation. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/155274 , adsurl =

  67. [67]

    Modeling Dust Polarization Observations of Molecular Clouds through MHD Simulations

    Modelling dust polarization observations of molecular clouds through MHD simulations. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3096 , archivePrefix =. 1709.08641 , primaryClass =

  68. [68]

    , keywords =

    From parallel to perpendicular - On the orientation of magnetic fields in molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2231 , archivePrefix =. 2003.00017 , primaryClass =

  69. [69]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic Fields in Star Formation: A Complete Compilation of All the DCF Estimations. , keywords =. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac3911 , archivePrefix =. 2111.05836 , primaryClass =

  70. [70]

    What are we learning from the relative orientation between density structures and the magnetic field in molecular clouds?

    What are we learning from the relative orientation between density structures and the magnetic field in molecular clouds?. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731049 , archivePrefix =. 1705.00477 , primaryClass =

  71. [71]

    , keywords =

    Alignment of the magnetic field in star-forming regions and why it might be difficult to observe. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2157 , archivePrefix =. 2106.12596 , primaryClass =

  72. [72]

    , keywords =

    Relative alignment between magnetic fields and molecular gas structure in molecular clouds. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad733 , archivePrefix =. 2303.07410 , primaryClass =

  73. [73]

    , keywords =

    The relative orientation between the magnetic field and gas density structures in non-gravitating turbulent media. , keywords =. doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3078 , archivePrefix =. 2010.01178 , primaryClass =

  74. [74]

    Theoretical Models of Polarized Dust Emission from Protostellar Cores

    Theoretical Models of Polarized Dust Emission from Protostellar Cores. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/322504 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0104231 , primaryClass =

  75. [75]

    SCUBA Polarization Measurements of the Magnetic Field Strengths in the L183, L1544, and L43 Prestellar Cores

    SCUBA Polarization Measurements of the Magnetic Field Strengths in the L183, L1544, and L43 Prestellar Cores. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/379705 , archivePrefix =. astro-ph/0305604 , primaryClass =

  76. [76]

    Planck 2013 results. IX. HFI spectral response. , keywords =. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321531 , archivePrefix =. 1303.5070 , primaryClass =

  77. [77]

    , keywords =

    Magnetic Fields in Interstellar Clouds from Zeeman Observations: Inference of Total Field Strengths by Bayesian Analysis. , keywords =. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/725/1/466 , adsurl =

  78. [78]

    I,Strict flux-freezing

    The magnetic field of a contracting gas cloud. I,Strict flux-freezing. , year = 1966, month = jan, volume =. doi:10.1093/mnras/133.2.265 , adsurl =

  79. [79]

    Ambipolar Diffusion and Star Formation: Formation and Contraction of Axisymmetric Cloud Cores. II. Results. , keywords =. doi:10.1086/173193 , adsurl =

  80. [80]

    The non-isothermal stage of magnetic star formation - II. Results. , keywords =. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17110.x , archivePrefix =. 1003.2722 , primaryClass =

Showing first 80 references.