pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.23952 · v1 · pith:QATIZ6WInew · submitted 2026-06-22 · 🪐 quant-ph

Biophysical EPR Using Superconducting Resonators

Austin R. Gamble Jarvi , Hamid R. Mohebbi , Ishit Raval , Omari Culzac , Jack Erickson , Sameh Hegazy , Don Carkner , Andrew Wiles
show 2 more authors
David G. Cory Troy W. Borneman
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 07:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords superconducting resonatorspulsed EPRDEERspin-labeled proteinsbiophysical measurementsmicrostrip resonatorhigh sensitivity EPRprotein distance measurements
0
0 comments X

The pith

A novel patterned thin film superconducting microstrip resonator achieves 6 ns pi/2 Gaussian pulses for DEER measurements on spin-labeled proteins below 10 uM.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows how a custom X-band pulsed EPR spectrometer with FPGA digital control can drive a new superconducting resonator to produce short, strong microwave pulses on tiny biological samples. This combination was tested by performing DEER distance measurements on several spin-labeled protein samples at concentrations typical for real biological work, including under 10 micromolar. The system also automates loading and measuring five 3.5 microliter samples in sequence. If the performance holds, it would make high-sensitivity pulsed EPR practical for studying proteins without needing large quantities of material. The overall result points toward wider use of superconducting resonators in biophysical EPR experiments.

Core claim

The novel patterned thin film planar superconducting microstrip resonator is capable of generating Rabi fields sufficient to achieve 6 ns pi/2 Gaussian pulses using a 100 W solid-state HPA, with the overall system enabling validated DEER distance measurements in spin-labeled protein samples at biologically relevant concentrations including below 10 uM, while supporting automated sequential calibration, measurement, and analysis of five 3.5 uL samples contained in a sample cartridge.

What carries the argument

patterned thin film planar superconducting microstrip resonator that generates the required Rabi fields for short pulses

If this is right

  • Validated DEER distance measurements become possible at protein concentrations below 10 uM.
  • Five 3.5 uL samples can be calibrated, measured, and analyzed automatically in one cartridge.
  • Pulsed EPR on biological samples gains higher bandwidth and stability through the superconducting resonator.
  • Applications of both superconducting resonators and EPR expand into biotechnology settings.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same resonator approach may support other pulsed EPR sequences beyond DEER on similar low-volume samples.
  • Reduced sample volume requirements could enable EPR studies on proteins that are difficult to produce in large quantities.
  • Automated multi-sample handling might scale to screening applications in structural biology.
  • Integration with existing solid-state amplifiers could lower barriers for labs adopting the method.

Load-bearing premise

The custom spectrometer, FPGA control, and resonator can be stably integrated with biological samples to reach the stated pulse lengths and measurement sensitivity without unstated limits on sample integrity or resonator performance.

What would settle it

Failure to produce reliable DEER signals or pulse lengths longer than 6 ns when the resonator is loaded with spin-labeled protein samples at concentrations below 10 uM.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.23952 by Andrew Wiles, Austin R. Gamble Jarvi, David G. Cory, Don Carkner, Hamid R. Mohebbi, Ishit Raval, Jack Erickson, Omari Culzac, Sameh Hegazy, Troy W. Borneman.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Overview of superconducting resonator design. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Overview of system characterization. (a) Microscope photograph of the 2-port 16-strip 300 nm YBCO superconducting microstrip resonator structure used in this study with ports labeled. Each microstrip is 4.532 mm long and 70 µm wide with 70 µm separation between strips. The capacitive coupling gap is 60 µm for both ports. VNA S-parameter measurements show an X-band frequency of 9.447 GHz with an overcoupled… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Shaped pulse RDSE distance measurement data for T4-Lysozyme. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Demonstrations of system measurement capabilities. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Structures of dinitroxide rulers [78] with distances listed in Table IV [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Adiabatic WURST [77] pulse waveform and simulated response for 200 ns pump pulse used in DEER measurements (a) IQ waveform. (b) Pulse response over resonance offsets. (c) Expectation value of Mz at resonance for varying pulse amplitude, indicating robustness to RF-inhomogeneity [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present innovations that enable the use of superconducting resonators for high sensitivity, high bandwidth pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) measurements on biologically relevant samples with enhanced stability and throughput. A custom-built X-band pulsed EPR spectrometer with AWG and digital IF capability generated by an FPGA was used to control a novel patterned thin film planar superconducting microstrip resonator capable of generating Rabi fields sufficient to achieve 6 ns pi/2 Gaussian pulses using a 100 W solid-state HPA. The system allows automated sequential calibration, measurement, and analysis of five 3.5 uL samples contained in a sample cartridge. Performance was validated through measurements of double electron-electron resonance (DEER) distances in a variety of spin-labeled protein samples with biologically relevant concentrations, including measurements below 10 uM. The results enable broadening the scope of applications for both superconducting resonators and the use of EPR in biotechnology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a custom-built X-band pulsed EPR spectrometer incorporating an FPGA-controlled AWG with digital IF, paired with a novel patterned thin film planar superconducting microstrip resonator. It claims this system generates Rabi fields sufficient for 6 ns π/2 Gaussian pulses using a 100 W solid-state HPA, supports automated sequential calibration and measurement of five 3.5 µL samples, and has its performance validated via DEER distance measurements on spin-labeled protein samples at biologically relevant concentrations including below 10 µM.

Significance. If the experimental claims are substantiated with data, the work could meaningfully extend the applicability of superconducting resonators to biophysical EPR by improving sensitivity and sample throughput at low concentrations, thereby broadening EPR's utility in biotechnology.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'Performance was validated through measurements of double electron-electron resonance (DEER) distances in a variety of spin-labeled protein samples...' is unsupported because the manuscript provides no accompanying data, figures, error bars, statistical analysis, or detailed methods sections describing these measurements.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The headline performance metrics (6 ns π/2 pulses and DEER sensitivity below 10 µM) rest on the unshown assumption that the resonator maintains sufficient Q-factor and power handling after introduction of lossy 3.5 µL protein/buffer samples; no before/after Q values, critical-current limits, or heating data under load are reported, leaving the integration step unverified.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The acronym 'HPA' appears without prior expansion (high-power amplifier), which is a minor clarity issue.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript describing the superconducting resonator-based X-band pulsed EPR system. We address each major comment point by point below and will revise the manuscript to better substantiate the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'Performance was validated through measurements of double electron-electron resonance (DEER) distances in a variety of spin-labeled protein samples...' is unsupported because the manuscript provides no accompanying data, figures, error bars, statistical analysis, or detailed methods sections describing these measurements.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract claim requires explicit supporting evidence within the manuscript. The current version does not sufficiently present the DEER data, figures, error bars, statistical analysis, or detailed methods. In the revised manuscript we will add the missing DEER results (including traces, distance distributions with error bars, and statistical details) for the spin-labeled protein samples at concentrations including below 10 µM, expand the methods section, and ensure the abstract directly references these additions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The headline performance metrics (6 ns π/2 pulses and DEER sensitivity below 10 µM) rest on the unshown assumption that the resonator maintains sufficient Q-factor and power handling after introduction of lossy 3.5 µL protein/buffer samples; no before/after Q values, critical-current limits, or heating data under load are reported, leaving the integration step unverified.

    Authors: We acknowledge this is a valid concern; the manuscript does not report before/after Q-factor values, critical-current limits, or heating data under load with the protein/buffer samples. The successful 6 ns pulses and DEER results provide indirect evidence of adequate performance, but this is insufficient. In the revised manuscript we will add the requested Q-factor measurements, power-handling details, critical-current information, and any available heating data under load to directly verify the resonator integration with lossy samples. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental validation only

full rationale

The paper reports construction and experimental testing of a custom EPR spectrometer and superconducting resonator, with performance claims supported by direct DEER distance measurements on spin-labeled protein samples. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations appear in the provided text that reduce any result to its own inputs by construction. The work is self-contained as an instrumentation report whose central claims rest on external sample measurements rather than internal redefinitions or ansatzes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are identifiable from the abstract alone, as the work focuses on experimental implementation and validation rather than theoretical modeling or derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1349 out tokens · 36359 ms · 2026-06-26T07:48:17.416004+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shaped Pulse 4p-DEER 20

  2. [2]

    RELOAD DEER-Stitch (RDS) 73

  3. [3]

    All sequences use Gaussian observe pulses

    RELOAD DEER-Stitch with Echo Train (RDSE) 128 SNR performance of various modified DEER sequences that enhance SNR. All sequences use Gaussian observe pulses

  4. [4]

    and adiabatic pump pulses [65]. Automation The high stability of our system and the dielectric similarity of each sample in our cartridges enable automated calibration routines, experiment setup, and data collection to run reliably without user input. Often, experiment setup and system tuning are the most time-consuming parts of a distance measurement, re...

  5. [5]

    Bienfait, J

    A. Bienfait, J. J. Pla, Y. Kubo, M. Stern, X. Zhou, C. C. Lo, C. D. Weis, T. Schenkel, M. L. W. Thewalt, D. Vion, D. Esteve, B. Julsgaard, K. Mølmer, J. J. L. Morton, and P. Bertet, Reaching the quantum limit of sensitivity in electron spin resonance, Nature Nanotechnology11, 253 (2016)

    2016

  6. [6]

    Ranjan, S

    V. Ranjan, S. Probst, B. Albanese, T. Schenkel, D. Vion, D. Esteve, J. J. L. Morton, and P. Bertet, Electron spin resonance spectroscopy with femtoliter detection volume, Applied Physics Letters116, 184002 (2020)

    2020

  7. [7]

    Jeschke, The contribution of modern EPR to structural biology, Emerging Topics in Life Sciences , ETLS20170143 (2018)

    G. Jeschke, The contribution of modern EPR to structural biology, Emerging Topics in Life Sciences , ETLS20170143 (2018)

    2018

  8. [8]

    Wunnicke and I

    D. Wunnicke and I. H¨ anelt, The Synergetic Effects of Combining Structural Biology and EPR Spectroscopy on Membrane Proteins, Crystals7, 117 (2017)

    2017

  9. [9]

    de Val, Understanding cell biology using cryo-electron microscopy, Biophysical Journal122, 542a (2023)

    N. de Val, Understanding cell biology using cryo-electron microscopy, Biophysical Journal122, 542a (2023)

    2023

  10. [10]

    Stock, L

    C. Stock, L. Hielkema, I. Tasc´ on, D. Wunnicke, G. T. Oostergetel, M. Azkargorta, C. Paulino, and I. H¨ anelt, Cryo-EM structures of KdpFABC suggest a K+ transport mechanism via two inter-subunit half-channels, Nature Communications9, 4971 (2018)

    2018

  11. [11]

    T. W. M. Fan and A. N. Lane, Applications of NMR spectroscopy to systems biochemistry, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy92-93, 18 (2016)

    2016

  12. [12]

    Klose, A

    D. Klose, A. Holla, C. Gmeiner, D. Nettels, I. Ritsch, N. Bross, M. Yulikov, F. H.-T. Allain, B. Schuler, and G. Jeschke, Resolving distance variations by single-molecule FRET and EPR spectroscopy using rotamer libraries, Biophysical Journal120, 4842 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    T. Wu, R. A. Stein, T.-Y. Kao, B. Brown, and H. S. Mchaourab, Modeling protein conformational ensembles by guid- ing AlphaFold2 with Double Electron Electron Resonance (DEER) distance distributions, Nature Communications 16, 7107 (2025)

    2025

  14. [14]

    del Alamo, L

    D. del Alamo, L. DeSousa, R. M. Nair, S. Rahman, J. Meiler, and H. S. Mchaourab, Integrated AlphaFold2 and DEER investigation of the conformational dynamics of a pH-dependent APC antiporter, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2206129119 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    T. W. Ettema, S. Inaba-Inoue, C. Thangaratnarajah, L. Alves da Silva, N. Senning, A. Clarke, P. Stepien, A. Shah, Y. Ma, K. Hardman, S. David, H. El Mkami, J. G. Heddle, N. Nomura, S. Ogasawara, S. Iwata, D. Ghilarov, C. Pliotas, T. Stockner, D. J. Slotboom, and K. Beis, Shared structural mechanisms of alternating access between the secondary peptide tran...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-026-71633-3 2026

  16. [16]

    Y. Ma, K. Ackermann, Q. Waheed, V. Postis, T. K. Smith, B. E. Bode, and C. Pliotas, Swapped and non-swapped TRAAK states co-exist in membranes at a ratio influenced by temperature, Nature Communications17, 3522 (2026)

    2026

  17. [17]

    Bonucci, O

    A. Bonucci, O. Ouari, B. Guigliarelli, V. Belle, and E. Mileo, In-cell EPR: progress towards structural studies inside cells, ChemBioChem21, 451 (2020)

    2020

  18. [18]

    Reichenwallner, B

    J. Reichenwallner, B. Liu, A. R. Balo, W.-L. Ou, and O. P. Ernst, Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy on G-protein-coupled receptors: Adopting strategies from related model systems, Current Opinion in Structural Biology69, 177 (2021)

    2021

  19. [19]

    Hofmann, A

    L. Hofmann, A. Mandato, S. Saxena, and S. Ruthstein, The use of EPR spectroscopy to study transcription mech- anisms, Biophysical Reviews14, 1141 (2022)

    2022

  20. [20]

    J. J. L. Morton and P. Bertet, Storing quantum information in spins and high-sensitivity ESR, Journal of Magnetic Resonance287, 128 (2018)

    2018

  21. [21]

    Artzi, Y

    Y. Artzi, Y. Yishay, M. Fanciulli, M. Jbara, and A. Blank, Superconducting micro-resonators for electron spin resonance - the good, the bad, and the future, Journal of Magnetic Resonance334, 107102 (2022)

    2022

  22. [22]

    Akhmetzyanov, T

    D. Akhmetzyanov, T. W. Borneman, I. Taminiau, S. Sadeghi, H. R. Mohebbi, and D. G. Cory, Electron spin resonance spectroscopy using a Nb superconducting resonator, Applied Physics Letters123, 224002 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    Jeschke, DEER Distance Measurements on Proteins, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry63, 419 (2012)

    G. Jeschke, DEER Distance Measurements on Proteins, Annual Review of Physical Chemistry63, 419 (2012)

    2012

  24. [24]

    Schmidt, J

    T. Schmidt, J. Jeon, W.-M. Yau, C. D. Schwieters, R. Tycko, and G. M. Clore, Time-resolved DEER EPR and solid- state NMR afford kinetic and structural elucidation of substrate binding to Ca2+-ligated calmodulin, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences119, e2122308119 (2022)

    2022

  25. [25]

    Kaufmann, T

    T. Kaufmann, T. J. Keller, J. M. Franck, R. P. Barnes, S. J. Glaser, J. M. Martinis, and S. Han, DAC-board based X-band EPR spectrometer with arbitrary waveform control, Journal of Magnetic Resonance235, 95 (2013)

    2013

  26. [26]

    Z. Shi, S. Mu, X. Qin, Y. Dai, X. Rong, and J. Du, An X-band pulsed electron paramagnetic resonance spectrom- eter with time resolution improved by a field-programmable-gate-array based pulse generator, Review of Scientific Instruments89, 125104 (2018)

    2018

  27. [27]

    Kalendra, J

    V. Kalendra, J. Turˇ cak, J. Banys, J. J. L. Morton, and M. ˇSim˙ enas, X- and Q-band EPR with cryogenic amplifiers independent of sample temperature, Journal of Magnetic Resonance346, 107356 (2023)

    2023

  28. [28]

    Kalendra, J

    V. Kalendra, J. Turˇ cak, G. Useviˇ cius, H. Karas, M. H¨ ulsmann, A. Godt, G. Jeschke, J. Banys, J. J. L. Morton, and M. ˇSim˙ enas, Q-band EPR cryoprobe, Journal of Magnetic Resonance356, 107573 (2023). 9

    2023

  29. [29]

    ˇSim˙ enas, J

    M. ˇSim˙ enas, J. O’Sullivan, C. W. Zollitsch, O. Kennedy, M. Seif-Eddine, I. Ritsch, M. H¨ ulsmann, M. Qi, A. Godt, M. M. Roessler, G. Jeschke, and J. J. L. Morton, A sensitivity leap for X-band EPR using a probehead with a cryogenic preamplifier, Journal of Magnetic Resonance322, 106876 (2021)

    2021

  30. [30]

    Y. Twig, E. Dikarov, and A. Blank, Cryogenic electron spin resonance microimaging probe, Journal of Magnetic Resonance218, 22 (2012)

    2012

  31. [31]

    Pfenninger, W

    S. Pfenninger, W. Froncisz, and J. S. Hyde, Noise Analysis of EPR Spectrometers with Cryogenic Microwave Preamplifiers, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A113, 32 (1995)

    1995

  32. [32]

    Narkowicz, H

    R. Narkowicz, H. Ogata, E. Reijerse, and D. Suter, A cryogenic receiver for EPR, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 237, 79 (2013)

    2013

  33. [33]

    D. I. Hoult and R. E. Richards, The signal-to-noise ratio of the nuclear magnetic resonance experiment, Journal of Magnetic Resonance (1969)24, 71 (1976)

    1969

  34. [34]

    G. A. Rinard, R. W. Quine, R. Song, G. R. Eaton, and S. S. Eaton, Absolute EPR Spin Echo and Noise Intensities, Journal of Magnetic Resonance140, 69 (1999)

    1999

  35. [35]

    Albertinale, L

    E. Albertinale, L. Balembois, E. Billaud, V. Ranjan, D. Flanigan, T. Schenkel, D. Est` eve, D. Vion, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Detecting spins by their fluorescence with a microwave photon counter, Nature600, 434 (2021)

    2021

  36. [36]

    Ranjan, S

    V. Ranjan, S. Probst, B. Albanese, A. Doll, O. Jacquot, E. Flurin, R. Heeres, D. Vion, D. Esteve, J. J. L. Morton, and P. Bertet, Pulsed electron spin resonance spectroscopy in the Purcell regime, Journal of Magnetic Resonance 310, 106662 (2020)

    2020

  37. [37]

    Z. Wang, L. Balembois, M. Ranˇ ci´ c, E. Billaud, M. Le Dantec, A. Ferrier, P. Goldner, S. Bertaina, T. Chaneli` ere, D. Esteve, D. Vion, P. Bertet, and E. Flurin, Single-electron spin resonance detection by microwave photon counting, Nature619, 276 (2023)

    2023

  38. [38]

    Albanese, S

    B. Albanese, S. Probst, V. Ranjan, C. W. Zollitsch, M. Pechal, A. Wallraff, J. J. L. Morton, D. Vion, D. Esteve, E. Flurin, and P. Bertet, Radiative cooling of a spin ensemble, Nature Physics , 1 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Alsing and H

    P. Alsing and H. J. Carmichael, Spontaneous dressed-state polarization of a coupled atom and cavity mode, Quantum Optics: Journal of the European Optical Society Part B3, 13 (1991)

    1991

  40. [40]

    Blank, Y

    A. Blank, Y. Twig, and Y. Ishay, Recent trends in high spin sensitivity magnetic resonance, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Special Issue on Methodological advances in EPR spectroscopy and imaging,280, 20 (2017)

    2017

  41. [41]

    Tavis and F

    M. Tavis and F. W. Cummings, Exact Solution for an N-Molecule Radiation-Field Hamiltonian, Physical Review 170, 379 (1968)

    1968

  42. [42]

    L. G. Gunderman, A. Stasiuk, M. E. Mandouh, T. W. Borneman, and D. G. Cory, Lamb shift statistics in mesoscopic quantum ensembles, Quantum Information Processing21, 26 (2021)

    2021

  43. [43]

    H. R. Mohebbi, O. W. B. Benningshof, I. a. J. Taminiau, G. X. Miao, and D. G. Cory, Composite arrays of superconducting microstrip line resonators, Journal of Applied Physics115, 094502 (2014)

    2014

  44. [44]

    O. W. B. Benningshof, H. R. Mohebbi, I. A. J. Taminiau, G. X. Miao, and D. G. Cory, Superconducting microstrip resonator for pulsed ESR of thin films, Journal of Magnetic Resonance230, 84 (2013)

    2013

  45. [45]

    Bachar, O

    G. Bachar, O. Suchoi, O. Shtempluck, A. Blank, and E. Buks, Nonlinear induction detection of electron spin resonance, Applied Physics Letters101, 022602 (2012)

    2012

  46. [46]

    Bonizzoni, F

    C. Bonizzoni, F. Troiani, A. Ghirri, and M. Affronte, Microwave dual-mode resonators for coherent spin-photon coupling, Journal of Applied Physics124, 194501 (2018)

    2018

  47. [47]

    Velluire Pellat, E

    Z. Velluire Pellat, E. Mar´ echal, N. Moulonguet, G. Sa¨ ız, G. C. M´ enard, S. Kozlov, F. Cou¨ edo, P. Amari, C. Medous, J. Paris, R. Hostein, J. Lesueur, C. Feuillet-Palma, and N. Bergeal, Hybrid quantum systems with high-Tc super- conducting resonators, Scientific Reports13, 14366 (2023)

    2023

  48. [48]

    Hincks, C

    I. Hincks, C. Granade, T. Borneman, and D. Cory, Controlling Quantum Devices with Nonlinear Hardware, Physical Review Applied4, 024012 (2015)

    2015

  49. [49]

    G. A. Rinard, R. W. Quine, S. S. Eaton, G. R. Eaton, and W. Froncisz, Relative Benefits of Overcoupled Resonators vs Inherently Low-Q Resonators for Pulsed Magnetic Resonance, Journal of Magnetic Resonance, Series A108, 71 (1994)

    1994

  50. [50]

    L. G. Gunderman, T. W. Borneman, and D. G. Cory, Thermal state structure in the Tavis-Cummings model and rapid simulations in mesoscopic quantum ensembles, Physical Review Research7, 023155 (2025)

    2025

  51. [51]

    Polyhach, E

    Y. Polyhach, E. Bordignon, R. Tschaggelar, S. Gandra, A. Godt, and G. Jeschke, High sensitivity and versatility of the DEER experiment on nitroxide radical pairs at Q-band frequencies, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics14, 10762 (2012)

    2012

  52. [52]

    S. Kwon, A. Fadavi Roudsari, O. W. B. Benningshof, Y.-C. Tang, H. R. Mohebbi, I. A. J. Taminiau, D. Langenberg, S. Lee, G. Nichols, D. G. Cory, and G.-X. Miao, Magnetic field dependent microwave losses in superconducting niobium microstrip resonators, Journal of Applied Physics124, 033903 (2018)

    2018

  53. [53]

    A. D. Milov, K. Salikhov, and M. Shchirov, Application of the double resonance method to electron spin echo in a study of the spatial distribution of paramagnetic centers in solids, Sovietscaya Physics Solid Stated23, 565 (1981)

    1981

  54. [54]

    A. D. Milov, A. B. Ponomarev, and Y. D. Tsvetkov, Electron-electron double resonance in electron spin echo: Model biradical systems and the sensitized photolysis of decalin, Chemical Physics Letters110, 67 (1984)

    1984

  55. [55]

    R. E. Martin, M. Pannier, F. Diederich, V. Gramlich, M. Hubrich, and H. W. Spiess, Determination of End-to-End Distances in a Series of TEMPO Diradicals of up to 2.8 nm Length with a New Four-Pulse Double Electron Electron Resonance Experiment, Angewandte Chemie International Edition37, 2833 (1998)

    1998

  56. [56]

    Pannier, S

    M. Pannier, S. Veit, A. Godt, G. Jeschke, and H. W. Spiess, Dead-Time Free Measurement of Dipole–Dipole Interactions between Electron Spins, Journal of Magnetic Resonance142, 331 (2000). 10

    2000

  57. [57]

    Bahrenberg, S

    T. Bahrenberg, S. M. Jahn, A. Feintuch, S. Stoll, and D. Goldfarb, The decay of the refocused Hahn echo in double electron–electron resonance (DEER) experiments, Magnetic Resonance2, 161 (2021)

    2021

  58. [58]

    Milikisiyants, M

    S. Milikisiyants, M. A. Voinov, A. Marek, M. Jafarabadi, J. Liu, R. Han, S. Wang, and A. I. Smirnov, Enhanc- ing sensitivity of Double Electron-Electron Resonance (DEER) by using Relaxation-Optimized Acquisition Length Distribution (RELOAD) scheme, Journal of Magnetic Resonance298, 115 (2019)

    2019

  59. [59]

    J. E. Lovett, B. W. Lovett, and J. Harmer, DEER-Stitch: Combining three- and four-pulse DEER measurements for high sensitivity, deadtime free data, Journal of Magnetic Resonance223, 98 (2012)

    2012

  60. [60]

    Mentink-Vigier, A

    F. Mentink-Vigier, A. Collauto, A. Feintuch, I. Kaminker, V. Tarle, and D. Goldfarb, Increasing sensitivity of pulse EPR experiments using echo train detection schemes, Journal of Magnetic Resonance236, 117 (2013)

    2013

  61. [61]

    Probst, A

    S. Probst, A. Bienfait, P. Campagne-Ibarcq, J. J. Pla, B. Albanese, J. F. Da Silva Barbosa, T. Schenkel, D. Vion, D. Esteve, K. Mølmer, J. J. L. Morton, R. Heeres, and P. Bertet, Inductive-detection electron-spin resonance spectroscopy with 65 spins/ Hz sensitivity, Applied Physics Letters111, 202604 (2017)

    2017

  62. [62]

    T. W. Borneman, M. D. H¨ urlimann, and D. G. Cory, Application of optimal control to CPMG refocusing pulse design, Journal of Magnetic Resonance207, 220 (2010)

    2010

  63. [63]

    Endeward, M

    B. Endeward, M. Bretschneider, P. Trenkler, and T. F. Prisner, Implementation and applications of shaped pulses in EPR, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy136-137, 61 (2023)

    2023

  64. [64]

    E. R. Lowe, S. Stoll, and J. P. Kestner, Optimizing EPR pulses for broadband excitation and refocusing, Journal of Magnetic Resonance369, 107807 (2024)

    2024

  65. [65]

    A. R. Balo, H. Feyrer, and O. P. Ernst, Toward Precise Interpretation of DEER-Based Distance Distributions: Insights from Structural Characterization of V1 Spin-Labeled Side Chains, Biochemistry55, 5256 (2016)

    2016

  66. [66]

    H. S. Mchaourab, M. A. Lietzow, K. Hideg, and W. L. Hubbell, Motion of Spin-Labeled Side Chains in T4 Lysozyme. Correlation with Protein Structure and Dynamics, Biochemistry35, 7692 (1996)

    1996

  67. [67]

    P. P. Borbat, H. S. Mchaourab, and J. H. Freed, Protein Structure Determination Using Long Distance Constraints from Double Quantum Coherence ESR: Study of T4 Lysozyme, Journal of the American Chemical Society124, 5304 (2002)

    2002

  68. [68]

    Teucher and E

    M. Teucher and E. Bordignon, Improved signal fidelity in 4-pulse DEER with Gaussian pulses, Journal of Magnetic Resonance296, 103 (2018)

    2018

  69. [69]

    A. Doll, S. Pribitzer, R. Tschaggelar, and G. Jeschke, Adiabatic and fast passage ultra-wideband inversion in pulsed EPR, Journal of Magnetic Resonance230, 27 (2013)

    2013

  70. [70]

    Schiemann, C

    O. Schiemann, C. A. Heubach, D. Abdullin, K. Ackermann, M. Azarkh, E. G. Bagryanskaya, M. Drescher, B. En- deward, J. H. Freed, L. Galazzo, D. Goldfarb, T. Hett, L. Esteban Hofer, L. F´ abregas Ib´ a˜ nez, E. J. Hustedt, S. Kucher, I. Kuprov, J. E. Lovett, A. Meyer, S. Ruthstein, S. Saxena, S. Stoll, C. R. Timmel, M. Di Valentin, H. S. Mchaourab, T. F. Pr...

    2021

  71. [71]

    P. E. Spindler, Y. Zhang, B. Endeward, N. Gershernzon, T. E. Skinner, S. J. Glaser, and T. F. Prisner, Shaped optimal control pulses for increased excitation bandwidth in EPR, Journal of Magnetic Resonance218, 49 (2012)

    2012

  72. [72]

    Doll and G

    A. Doll and G. Jeschke, Fourier-transform electron spin resonance with bandwidth-compensated chirp pulses, Journal of Magnetic Resonance246, 18 (2014)

    2014

  73. [73]

    T. W. Borneman and D. G. Cory, Bandwidth-limited control and ringdown suppression in high-Q resonators, Journal of Magnetic Resonance225, 120 (2012)

    2012

  74. [74]

    Mandato, Z

    A. Mandato, Z. Hasanbasri, and S. Saxena, Double Quantum Coherence ESR at Q-Band Enhances the Sensitivity of Distance Measurements at Submicromolar Concentrations, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters14, 8909 (2023)

    2023

  75. [75]

    Milikisyants, F

    S. Milikisyants, F. Scarpelli, M. G. Finiguerra, M. Ubbink, and M. Huber, A pulsed EPR method to determine distances between paramagnetic centers with strong spectral anisotropy and radicals: The dead-time free RIDME sequence, Journal of Magnetic Resonance201, 48 (2009)

    2009

  76. [76]

    Jeschke, M

    G. Jeschke, M. Pannier, A. Godt, and H. W. Spiess, Dipolar spectroscopy and spin alignment in electron paramag- netic resonance, Chemical Physics Letters331, 243 (2000)

    2000

  77. [77]

    Meyer, J

    A. Meyer, J. J. Jassoy, S. Spicher, A. Berndh¨ auser, and O. Schiemann, Performance of PELDOR, RIDME, SIFTER, and DQC in measuring distances in trityl based bi- and triradicals: exchange coupling, pseudosecular coupling and multi-spin effects, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics20, 13858 (2018)

    2018

  78. [78]

    Gamble Jarvi, X

    A. Gamble Jarvi, X. Bogetti, K. Singewald, S. Ghosh, and S. Saxena, Going the dHis-tance: Site-Directed Cu2+ Labeling of Proteins and Nucleic Acids, Accounts of Chemical Research54, 1481 (2021)

    2021

  79. [79]

    C. E. Tait and S. Stoll, Coherent pump pulses in Double Electron Electron Resonance spectroscopy, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics18, 18470 (2016)

    2016

  80. [80]

    Mandal, V

    S. Mandal, V. D. M. Koroleva, T. W. Borneman, Y.-Q. Song, and M. D. H¨ urlimann, Axis-matching excitation pulses for CPMG-like sequences in inhomogeneous fields, Journal of Magnetic Resonance237, 1 (2013)

    2013

Showing first 80 references.