Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 minor 66 references

From Spectral Singularities to Multipartite Entanglement Scaling at Higher-Order Exceptional Points

T0 review · 0 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-26 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Near an nth-order exceptional point, genuine multipartite entanglement in identical-qubit systems exhibits fractional-power scaling under weak perturbations.

desk verdict The paper connects symmetry-constrained higher-order EPs to fractional multipartite entanglement scaling in identical qubits, and the core symmetry bound plus scaling inheritance hold up under standard arguments. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.24205 v1 pith:CTPD3NRA submitted 2026-06-23 quant-ph

Chunlai Yang , Shuheng Liu , Xinyao Huang , Kaiye Shi , Qiongyi He This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-ph
keywords exceptionalpointsmultipartiteentanglementnon-Hermitiansystemsqubitinteractionspermutationsymmetryfractionalscalingspectralsingularitiesmany-bodycorrelations
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper develops a framework that connects higher-order exceptional points in non-Hermitian systems to the scaling behavior of genuine multipartite entanglement. Permutation symmetry of identical qubits decomposes the Hilbert space into independent sectors, which limits the highest possible EP order to N+1 for N qubits. Near such an nth-order point the entanglement inherits the spectral response and shows fractional scaling when the system is weakly perturbed. Examples demonstrate that two-body interactions can produce third- and fourth-order EPs with matching entanglement behavior, while higher-order EPs require additional independent channels such as three-body interactions. This establishes a direct link between spectral singularities and many-body quantum correlations through symmetry.

What carries the argument

Irreducible-representation sectors from permutation symmetry of identical qubits, which constrain EP order and transmit fractional spectral scaling to multipartite entanglement.

What would settle it

An experimental measurement showing an EP of order higher than N+1 in an N-qubit permutation-symmetric system, or an absence of the predicted fractional-power scaling in entanglement near a confirmed nth-order EP.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that genuine multipartite entanglement near an nth-order exceptional point inherits the spectral response and generically exhibits fractional-power scaling under weak perturbations in interacting identical-qubit systems. Permutation symmetry decomposes the exponentially large Hilbert space into independent irreducible-representation sectors, constraining the maximal EP order of N qubits to N+1. Conventional two-body interactions support third- and fourth-order EPs with the corresponding entanglement responses, whereas higher-order EPs with genuine multipartite-entangled coalesced states require additional independent interaction channels such as three-body interactions.

Load-bearing premise

Permutation symmetry of the identical qubits decomposes the Hilbert space into independent sectors that limit the maximal EP order to N+1.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Genuine multipartite entanglement will display the same fractional powers as the eigenvalue splitting near an nth-order EP.
  • Two-body interactions alone suffice to realize third- and fourth-order EPs together with their associated entanglement scaling.
  • Reaching EP orders higher than four with genuinely multipartite-entangled coalesced states requires adding independent higher-body interaction terms.
  • The symmetry decomposition reduces the problem size and thereby makes explicit construction of higher-order EPs feasible for moderate N.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Entanglement measurements could serve as a practical experimental probe for determining the order of an exceptional point without full spectral tomography.
  • The same symmetry decomposition approach may extend to other identical-particle systems to locate and engineer higher-order EPs beyond qubits.
  • Tuning the number of independent interaction channels offers a route to select specific fractional exponents in the entanglement response for non-Hermitian quantum devices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a symmetry-based framework connecting higher-order exceptional points (EPs) in non-Hermitian identical-qubit systems to the scaling of genuine multipartite entanglement. Permutation symmetry (S_N) decomposes the 2^N-dimensional Hilbert space into irreducible-representation sectors, bounding the largest possible Jordan block (hence EP order) by the dimension of the totally symmetric sector, which is N+1. The central claim is that near an nth-order EP the genuine multipartite entanglement inherits the spectral response and exhibits generic fractional-power scaling ~ε^{1/n} under weak perturbations; explicit constructions show that two-body interactions realize orders 3 and 4 while higher orders require additional independent channels such as three-body terms.

Significance. If the derivations hold, the work extends EP physics from spectral singularities to many-body quantum correlations by linking non-Hermitian degeneracies directly to entanglement scaling via symmetry. Credit is due for the standard but cleanly applied S_N decomposition that correctly limits maximal EP order, the explicit low-order constructions, and the observation that genuine multipartite-entangled coalesced states at higher order necessitate multi-body interactions. These elements provide concrete, falsifiable predictions for non-Hermitian qubit platforms.

minor comments (2)
  1. The precise quantitative measure of 'genuine multipartite entanglement' (e.g., which witness or entropy) should be stated explicitly in the main text when the scaling is first derived, to allow direct verification of continuity under eigenvector perturbation.
  2. Notation for the perturbation parameter ε and the resulting scaling exponent should be introduced once in a dedicated paragraph rather than appearing first in the abstract and later in examples.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the clear summary of our results, and the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper's framework rests on standard group-theoretic decomposition of the N-qubit Hilbert space under S_N permutation symmetry (bounding Jordan-block size by the symmetric irrep dimension N+1) followed by ordinary non-Hermitian perturbation theory applied to the resulting coalesced eigenvectors. These steps are independent of the target entanglement-scaling claim; no parameter is fitted to data and then relabeled a prediction, no self-citation supplies a uniqueness theorem, and no ansatz is smuggled in. The fractional-power inheritance for genuine multipartite entanglement follows directly from continuity of standard entanglement monotones on the perturbed eigenvectors, without reducing to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on standard non-Hermitian perturbation theory around coalescing eigenvalues and the representation theory of the permutation group; no free parameters or new entities are introduced in the abstract.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption Permutation symmetry decomposes the Hilbert space into independent irreducible-representation sectors that limit maximal EP order to N+1.
    Invoked to constrain EP order and enable the entanglement scaling claim.
  • domain assumption Genuine multipartite entanglement inherits the fractional spectral response of the nth-order EP under weak perturbations.
    Central link between spectral singularity and entanglement measure.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Spectral Singularities to Multipartite Entanglement Scaling at Higher-Order Exceptional Points." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CTPD3NRA

@misc{pith2026260624205,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Spectral Singularities to Multipartite Entanglement Scaling at Higher-Order Exceptional Points},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CTPD3NRA}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.24205}
}
abstract

Exceptional points (EPs) are non-Hermitian spectral singularities exhibiting fractional-power responses, yet their implications for multipartite entanglement of interacting quantum many-body systems remain largely unexplored. Here we develop a general framework that links higher-order non-Hermitian degeneracies to the scaling behavior of genuine multipartite entanglement in interacting identical-qubit systems. Permutation symmetry of the identical qubits decomposes the exponentially large Hilbert space into independent irreducible-representation sectors, thereby constraining the maximal EP order of $N$ qubits to $N+1$ rather than $2^N$. Near an $n$th-order EP, genuine multipartite entanglement inherits the spectral response and generically exhibits a fractional-power scaling under weak perturbations. Explicit examples show that conventional two-body interactions support third- and fourth-order EPs with the corresponding entanglement responses, whereas higher-order EPs with genuine multipartite-entangled coalesced states require additional independent interaction channels, such as three-body interactions. Our results establish a fundamental connection among non-Hermitian degeneracies, multipartite entanglement, and symmetry, extending higher-order EP physics from spectral singularities to genuine many-body quantum correlations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24205 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) Schematic of interacting identical-qubit systems, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (a) Schematic of an interacting two-qubit sys [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Schematic of the interacting four-qubit system with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- Hermitian Hamiltonians having PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  2. [2]

    Ashida, Z

    Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Non-Hermitian physics, Adv. Phys.69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    El-Ganainy, K

    R. El-Ganainy, K. G. Makris, M. Khajavikhan, Z. H. Musslimani, S. Rotter, and D. N. Christodoulides, Non- Hermitian physics and PT symmetry, Nat. Phys.14, 11 (2018)

    2018

  4. [4]

    Miri and A

    M.-A. Miri and A. Alù, Exceptional points in optics and photonics, Science363, eaar7709 (2019)

    2019

  5. [5]

    Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Parity– time symmetry and exceptional points in photonics, Nat. Mater.18, 783 (2019)

    2019

  6. [6]

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-Hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys.4, 745 (2022)

    2022

  7. [7]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Ex- ceptional topology of non-Hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Doppler, A

    J. Doppler, A. A. Mailybaev, J. Böhm, U. Kuhl, A. Girschik, F. Libisch, T. J. Milburn, P. Rabl, N. Moi- seyev, and S. Rotter, Dynamically encircling an ex- ceptional point for asymmetric mode switching, Nature (London)537, 76 (2016)

    2016

Show all 66 references
  1. [9]

    J. W. Yoon, Y. Choi, C. Hahn, G. Kim, S. H. Song, K.-Y. Yang, J. Y. Lee, Y. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. K. Shin, H.-S. Lee, and P. Berini, Time-asymmetric loop around an exceptional point over the full optical communications band, Nature (London)562, 86 (2018)

    2018

  2. [10]

    H. Xu, D. Mason, L. Jiang, and J. G. E. Harris, Topo- logical energy transfer in an optomechanical system with exceptional points, Nature (London)537, 80 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: application to microcavity sensors for single-particle de- tection, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Enhancing the sensitivity of frequency and energy splitting detection by using exceptional points: application to microcavity sensors for single-particle de- tection, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 203901 (2014)

    2014

  4. [12]

    W. Chen, Ş. Kaya Özdemir, G. Zhao, J. Wiersig, and L. Yang, Exceptional points enhance sensing in an optical microcavity, Nature (London)548, 192 (2017)

    2017

  5. [13]

    Hodaei, A

    H. Hodaei, A. U. Hassan, S. Wittek, H. Garcia-Gracia, R. El-Ganainy, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Kha- javikhan, Enhanced sensitivity at higher-order excep- tional points, Nature (London)548, 187 (2017)

    2017

  6. [14]

    Wiersig, Prospects and fundamental limits in ex- ceptional point-based sensing, Nat

    J. Wiersig, Prospects and fundamental limits in ex- ceptional point-based sensing, Nat. Commun.11, 2454 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Lau and A

    H.-K. Lau and A. A. Clerk, Fundamental limits and non- reciprocal approaches in non-Hermitian quantum sens- ing, Nat. Commun.9, 4320 (2018)

    2018

  8. [16]

    L. Feng, Z. J. Wong, R.-M. Ma, Y. Wang, and X. Zhang, Single-modelaserbyparity-timesymmetrybreaking,Sci- ence346, 972 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Hodaei, M.-A

    H. Hodaei, M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, D. N. Christodoulides, and M. Khajavikhan, Parity-time– symmetric microring lasers, Science346, 975 (2014)

    2014

  10. [18]

    B. Peng, Ş. K. Özdemir, S. Rotter, H. Yilmaz, M. Liertzer, F. Monifi, C. M. Bender, F. Nori, and L. Yang, Loss-induced suppression and revival of lasing, Science346, 328 (2014)

    2014

  11. [19]

    P. Miao, Z. Zhang, J. Sun, W. Walasik, S. Longhi, N. M. Litchinitser, and L. Feng, Orbital angular momentum mi- crolaser, Science353, 464 (2016)

    2016

  12. [20]

    L. Feng, R. El-Ganainy, and L. Ge, Non-Hermitian pho- tonics based on parity–time symmetry, Nat. Photon.11, 752 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    K. Ding, G. Ma, M. Xiao, Z. Q. Zhang, and C. T. Chan, Emergence, coalescence, and topological properties of multiple exceptional points and their experimental re- 6 alization, Phys. Rev. X6, 021007 (2016)

    2016

  14. [22]

    W. Tang, X. Jiang, K. Ding, Y.-X. Xiao, Z.-Q. Zhang, C. T. Chan, and G. Ma, Exceptional nexus with a hybrid topological invariant, Science370, 1077 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Y. Choi, C. Hahn, J. W. Yoon, and S. H. Song, Ob- servation of an anti-PT-symmetric exceptional point and energy-difference conserving dynamics in electrical cir- cuit resonators, Nat. Commun.9, 2182 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    W. Zhao, Y. Zhang, Z. Gao, D. Peng, J.-l. Kou, Y.-q. Lu, R. El-Ganainy, Ş. K. Özdemir, and Q. Zhong, Ex- ceptional points induced by unidirectional coupling in electronic circuits, Nat. Commun.15, 9907 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    Cui, R.-Y

    X. Cui, R.-Y. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Wang, G. Ma, and C. T. Chan, Experimental realization of stable excep- tional chains protected by non-hermitian latent symme- tries unique to mechanical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 237201 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Naghiloo, M

    M. Naghiloo, M. Abbasi, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Quantum state tomography across the excep- tional point in a single dissipative qubit, Nat. Phys.15, 1232 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    Abbasi, W

    M. Abbasi, W. Chen, M. Naghiloo, Y. N. Joglekar, and K. W. Murch, Topological quantum state control through exceptional-point proximity, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 160401 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    L. Ding, K. Shi, Q. Zhang, D. Shen, X. Zhang, and W. Zhang, Experimental determination of PT-symmetric exceptional points in a single trapped ion, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 083604 (2021)

    2021

  21. [29]

    Y.-Y. Chen, K. Li, L. Zhang, Y.-K. Wu, J.-Y. Ma, H.- X. Yang, C. Zhang, B.-X. Qi, Z.-C. Zhou, P.-Y. Hou, Y.Xu,andL.-M.Duan,Quantumtomographyofathird- order exceptional point in a dissipative trapped ion, Nat. Commun.16, 7478 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    Y. Wu, W. Liu, J. Geng, X. Song, X. Ye, C.-K. Duan, X. Rong, and J. Du, Observation of parity-time symme- try breaking in a single-spin system, Science364, 878 (2019)

    2019

  23. [31]

    Y. Wu, Y. Wang, X. Ye, W. Liu, Z. Niu, C.-K. Duan, Y. Wang, X. Rong, and J. Du, Third-order exceptional lineinanitrogen-vacancyspinsystem,Nat.Nanotechnol. 19, 160 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    J. Li, A. K. Harter, J. Liu, L. De Melo, Y. N. Joglekar, and L. Luo, Observation of parity-time symmetry break- ing transitions in a dissipative Floquet system of ultra- cold atoms, Nat. Commun.10, 855 (2019)

    2019

  25. [33]

    K. Wang, L. Xiao, H. Lin, W. Yi, E. J. Bergholtz, and P. Xue, Experimental simulation of symmetry-protected higher-order exceptional points with single photons, Sci. Adv.9, eadi0732 (2023)

    2023

  26. [34]

    P.-R. Han, W. Ning, X.-J. Huang, R.-H. Zheng, S.-B. Yang, F. Wu, Z.-B. Yang, Q.-P. Su, C.-P. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Measuring topological invariants for higher-order exceptional points in quantum three-mode systems, Nat. Commun.15, 10293 (2024)

    2024

  27. [35]

    Zhang, T

    H. Zhang, T. Liu, Z. Xiang, K. Xu, H. Fan, andD. Zheng, Topologicaleigenvaluebraidingandquantumstatetrans- fer near a third-order exceptional point, PRX Quantum 6, 020328 (2025)

    2025

  28. [36]

    T. Shi, V. Smirnov, K. Shi, and W. Zhang, Enhanced response at exceptional points in multiqubit systems for sensing, Phys. Rev. A111, 032203 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    C.Yu, M.Tian, N.Kong, M.Fadel, X.Huang,andQ.He, Exceptional-point-induced nonequilibrium entanglement dynamics in bosonic networks, npj Quantum Inf.12, 14 (2026)

    2026

  30. [38]

    Zhang, Y.-L

    J. Zhang, Y.-L. Zhou, Y. Zuo, H. Zhang, P.-X. Chen, H.Jing,andL.-M.Kuang,Exceptionalentanglementand quantum sensing with a parity-time-symmetric two-qubit system, Adv. Quantum Technol.7, 2300350 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    M. Shi, G. Bao, J. Guo, and W. Zhang, Quantum metrol- ogy with higher-order exceptional points in atom-cavity magnonics, Phys. Rev. Res.7, L022034 (2025)

    2025

  32. [40]

    Z. Tang, T. Chen, X. Tang, and X. Zhang, Topolog- ically protected entanglement switching around excep- tional points, Light Sci. Appl.13, 167 (2024)

    2024

  33. [41]

    Kumar, K

    A. Kumar, K. W. Murch, and Y. N. Joglekar, Maximal quantum entanglement at exceptional points via unitary and thermal dynamics, Phys. Rev. A105, 012422 (2022)

    2022

  34. [42]

    Z.-Z. Li, W. Chen, M. Abbasi, K. W. Murch, and K. B. Whaley, Speeding up entanglement generation by prox- imity to higher-order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 100202 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    W. F. Yuan, B. B. Liu, N. Li, G. Y. Ding, W. Q. Ding, H. J. Du, J. C. Li, G. Chen, H. Jing, F. Zhou, S.-L. Su, and M. Feng, Beating Hermitian speed limits for entan- glement generation via exceptional points in a trapped- ion system, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 210201 (2026)

    2026

  36. [44]

    P.-R. Han, F. Wu, X.-J. Huang, H.-Z. Wu, C.-L. Zou, W. Yi, M. Zhang, H. Li, K. Xu, D. Zheng, H. Fan, J. Wen, Z.-B. Yang, and S.-B. Zheng, Exceptional entan- glement phenomena: non-Hermiticity meeting nonclassi- cality, Phys. Rev. Lett.131, 260201 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    X.-W. Luo, C. Zhang, and S. Du, Quantum squeez- ing and sensing with pseudo-anti-parity-time symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 173602 (2022)

    2022

  38. [46]

    Van den Nest, Measurement-based quantum compu- tation, Nat

    H.J.Briegel, D.E.Browne, W.Dür, R.Raussendorf,and M. Van den Nest, Measurement-based quantum compu- tation, Nat. Phys.5, 19 (2009)

    2009

  39. [47]

    Giovannetti, S

    V. Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, and L. Maccone, Quantum- enhanced measurements: beating the standard quantum limit, Science306, 1330 (2004)

    2004

  40. [48]

    T. R. de Oliveira, G. Rigolin, M. C. de Oliveira, and E. Miranda, Multipartite entanglement signature of quantum phase transitions, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 170401 (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    Hauke, M

    P. Hauke, M. Heyl, L. Tagliacozzo, and P. Zoller, Mea- suring multipartite entanglement through dynamic sus- ceptibilities, Nature Phys.12, 778 (2016)

    2016

  42. [50]

    Mandal and E

    I. Mandal and E. J. Bergholtz, Symmetry and higher- order exceptional points, Phys. Rev. Lett.127, 186601 (2021)

    2021

  43. [51]

    O. Katz, L. Feng, A. Risinger, C. Monroe, and M. Cetina, Demonstration of three- and four-body interactions be- tween trapped-ion spins, Nat. Phys.19, 1452 (2023)

    2023

  44. [52]

    O. Katz, M. Cetina, and C. Monroe, N-body interactions between trapped ion qubits via spin-dependent squeez- ing, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 063603 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    Menke, W

    T. Menke, W. P. Banner, T. R. Bergamaschi, A. Di Paolo, A. Vepsäläinen, S. J. Weber, R. Winik, A. Melville, B. M. Niedzielski,et al., Demonstration of tunable three-body interactions between superconduct- ing qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 220501 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Weyl,The classical groups: their invariants and rep- resentations(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,

    H. Weyl,The classical groups: their invariants and rep- resentations(Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ,

  47. [55]

    10.1515/9781400883905

    doi

  48. [56]

    [2, 13, 54, 57, 58], for details on the EP structures 7 in identical-qubit systems, derivation of scaling law for GME near EPs, and interacting identical-qubit system examples

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] which includes Refs. [2, 13, 54, 57, 58], for details on the EP structures 7 in identical-qubit systems, derivation of scaling law for GME near EPs, and interacting identical-qubit system examples

  49. [57]

    Z. Li, X. Huang, H. Zhu, G. Zhang, F. Wang, and X. Zhong, Multitype entanglement dynamics induced by exceptional points, Phys. Rev. A111, 022213 (2025)

    2025

  50. [58]

    Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at excep- tional points, Phys

    J. Wiersig, Response strengths of open systems at excep- tional points, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 023121 (2022)

    2022

  51. [59]

    Ma, Z.-H

    Z.-H. Ma, Z.-H. Chen, J.-L. Chen, C. Spengler, A. Gabriel, and M. Huber, Measure of genuine multipar- tite entanglement with computable lower bounds, Phys. Rev. A83, 062325 (2011)

    2011

  52. [60]

    C. Luo, H. Zhang, A. Chu, C. Maruko, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Hamiltonian engineering of collective XYZ spin models in an optical cavity, Nat. Phys.21, 916 (2025)

    2025

  53. [61]

    Monroe, W

    C. Monroe, W. C. Campbell, L.-M. Duan, Z.-X. Gong, A. V. Gorshkov, P. W. Hess, R. Islam, K. Kim, N. M. Linke, G. Pagano, P. Richerme, C. Senko, and N. Y. Yao, Programmable quantum simulations of spin systems with trapped ions, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 025001 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    I. M. Georgescu, S. Ashhab, and F. Nori, Quantum sim- ulation, Rev. Mod. Phys.86, 153 (2014)

    2014

  55. [63]

    Altman, K

    E. Altman, K. R. Brown, G. Carleo, L. D. Carr, E. Dem- ler, C. Chin, B. DeMarco, S. E. Economou, M. A. Eriks- son,et al., Quantum simulators: architectures and op- portunities, PRX Quantum2, 017003 (2021)

    2021

  56. [64]

    M. A. Norcia, R. J. Lewis-Swan, J. R. K. Cline, B. Zhu, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Cavity-mediated collec- tive spin-exchange interactions in a strontium superradi- ant laser, Science361, 259 (2018)

    2018

  57. [65]

    Sauerwein, F

    N. Sauerwein, F. Orsi, P. Uhrich, S. Bandyopadhyay, F. Mattiotti, T. Cantat-Moltrecht, G. Pupillo, P. Hauke, and J.-P. Brantut, Engineering random spin models with atomsinahigh-finessecavity,Nat.Phys.19,1128(2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    C. Luo, H. Zhang, C. Maruko, E. A. Bohr, A. Chu, A. M. Rey, and J. K. Thompson, Realization of three- and four- body interactions between momentum states in a cavity, Science390, 925 (2025)

    2025

Pith tools

Reviewed June 26, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.