Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 94 references

From Continuous-Time Random Walks to Laplace Tails

T0 review · 1 major / 0 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Exponential tails in the finite-time probability of renewal counts produce Laplace tails in the positional distribution of continuous-time random walks.

desk verdict The paper gives a finite-t rate function for the renewal count Q_t(n) in CTRW that produces Laplace tails in P(x,t), with simulation checks. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.24451 v1 pith:JBV3HAAS submitted 2026-06-23 cond-mat.stat-mech

Omer Hamdi , Stanislav Burov , Eli Barkai This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.stat-mech
keywords continuous-timerandomwalksLaplacetailsexponentialrenewalprocessesratefunctionsfinite-timestatisticsnon-Gaussiandiffusion
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper constructs a rate-function framework for Q_t(n), the probability of exactly n renewals occurring in time t within the CTRW model. It establishes that Q_t(n) itself decays exponentially at large n for any finite t. These exponential tails in the renewal count then transfer directly to the position distribution P(x,t), yielding the observed Laplace form of exponential decay instead of Gaussian spreading. The approach is checked against direct simulations across a range of times and against known large-deviation asymptotics.

What carries the argument

The finite-time rate function for the renewal-count probability Q_t(n), which governs the large-deviation statistics of the number of steps and thereby sets the form of the position distribution.

What would settle it

Simulations of a CTRW with a given waiting-time distribution in which P(x,t) fails to display clear exponential tails at intermediate times where the rate-function description is claimed to apply.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

By developing a rate function for Q_t(n) that holds at finite t and is derived from the underlying waiting-time distribution, we show that Q_t(n) possesses exponential tails. Because the displacement after time t is accumulated through the sequence of n jumps, the exponential decay in Q_t(n) implies exponential tails in the probability density P(x,t). This mechanism accounts for Laplace tails over a broad temporal window, matching both numerical trajectories and asymptotic rate-function predictions.

Load-bearing premise

A rate function for Q_t(n) at any finite t can be obtained directly from the waiting-time distribution without extra assumptions or fitting.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Laplace tails in P(x,t) emerge at finite times rather than only in the long-time limit.
  • The tail shape of P(x,t) is controlled by the large-n behavior of Q_t(n) for any waiting-time distribution that permits a rate function.
  • Non-Gaussian displacements in complex media can arise solely from the statistics of renewal counts without additional spatial disorder.
  • The same framework supplies quantitative predictions for the crossover from short-time to long-time tail behavior.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The result suggests that any renewal process whose step-count probability decays exponentially will generically produce Laplace rather than Gaussian observables.
  • One could test the framework by measuring the distribution of jump counts directly in single-particle trajectories and checking whether its tails match those inferred from position data.
  • The approach may extend to other counting observables, such as the number of state changes in molecular motors or the number of binding events in cellular transport.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper develops a rate-function-like framework for the renewal-count probability Q_t(n) in continuous-time random walks, valid at finite t. It claims that Q_t(n) exhibits exponential tails for general waiting-time distributions, and that these tails induce exponential (Laplace) tails in the positional density P(x,t) = ∑_n Q_t(n) p^{*n}(x). The results are stated to compare favorably with finite-time simulations and large-deviation asymptotics over a wide temporal range.

Significance. If the finite-t construction is free of hidden assumptions or post-hoc restrictions on the waiting-time pdf, the work supplies a concrete mechanism linking CTRW renewal statistics to the non-Gaussian Laplace tails observed in single-particle tracking. The explicit finite-time focus and direct comparison to simulations constitute a strength relative to purely asymptotic treatments.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / rate-function framework section] The central claim rests on the existence of a rate function I_t(n) for Q_t(n) at finite t that is derived directly from an arbitrary waiting-time pdf ψ(τ) via the renewal equation. The abstract and provided description give neither the explicit form of ψ(τ) nor the renewal-equation steps that establish the exponential tail of Q_t(n); without these, it is impossible to verify whether the exponential form is exact or an approximation that tacitly invokes the t→∞ limit or restricts ψ(τ).

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed reading of the manuscript. The major comment highlights a lack of explicit detail in the abstract concerning the waiting-time pdf and derivation. We address this below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / rate-function framework section] The central claim rests on the existence of a rate function I_t(n) for Q_t(n) at finite t that is derived directly from an arbitrary waiting-time pdf ψ(τ) via the renewal equation. The abstract and provided description give neither the explicit form of ψ(τ) nor the renewal-equation steps that establish the exponential tail of Q_t(n); without these, it is impossible to verify whether the exponential form is exact or an approximation that tacitly invokes the t→∞ limit or restricts ψ(τ).

    Authors: The full manuscript derives I_t(n) directly from the renewal equation applied to a general waiting-time pdf ψ(τ), without restricting its form or invoking the t→∞ limit; the exponential tail of Q_t(n) follows at finite t from the structure of this equation. The abstract is intentionally concise and therefore omits these steps, which are presented in the main text. We will revise the abstract to state that the framework holds for arbitrary ψ(τ) and to reference the renewal-equation derivation. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained from CTRW renewal equations

full rationale

The paper derives the finite-t rate-function framework for Q_t(n) directly from the CTRW renewal structure and waiting-time distribution ψ(τ), then shows the resulting exponential tails propagate to P(x,t) via the standard convolution sum. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted parameter or self-citation by construction; the cited short letter is referenced only as prior presentation, not as the load-bearing justification for the finite-t exponential form. External numerical simulations and large-deviation comparisons provide independent checks. This matches the default expectation of a non-circular paper.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Based solely on the abstract, the claim rests on standard renewal theory and large-deviation principles applied to the CTRW; no free parameters, invented entities, or ad-hoc axioms are mentioned.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Large-deviation rate functions exist and govern the tails of Q_t(n) for finite t in the CTRW
    Invoked to establish the exponential form of Q_t(n) that propagates to P(x,t)

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of From Continuous-Time Random Walks to Laplace Tails." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/JBV3HAAS

@misc{pith2026260624451,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: From Continuous-Time Random Walks to Laplace Tails},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/JBV3HAAS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.24451}
}
abstract

During Brownian motion, the displacement is normally distributed, a classical fact aligned with the central limit theorem. However, single particle tracking in complex media such as glasses, living cells, and colloidal suspensions often reveals pronounced exponential decay of the displacement distribution, known as Laplace tails. In a short letter, two of us presented the emergence of Laplace tails in the continuous time random walk (CTRW) framework. Here, a detailed complementary study is presented. By exploring the behavior of $Q_t(n)$, the probability that exactly $n$ renewals occur during time $t$, we develop a rate function-like framework for this quantity, valid for finite $t$. We show that $Q_t(n)$ exhibits exponential tails, which in turn give rise to exponential tails of the positional probability density function $P(x,t)$. Favorable comparison to finite-time numerical simulations and asymptotic large deviation rate functions establishes the validity of our results over a wide temporal range.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24451 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Comparative analysis of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Comparative analysis of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Universality of exponential-like tails. Comparison [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Using numerical solution of the CTRW presented [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Comparison of the rate function of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

94 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    numerical large deviation

    using different methods. While our results stem from taking the limit oft→ ∞ofP(x, t), obtained for finitet, in [69] the authors operated with LDT rate function ex- pressions ofQ t(n) andϕ(x|n). Nevertheless, we demon- strate the asymptotic agreement of the two approaches in the large-tlimit. II. CTRW MODEL We consider a continuous-time random walk, where...

  2. [2]

    Hamdi, S

    O. Hamdi, S. Burov, and E. Barkai, The European Physical Journal B97, 1 (2024)

    2024

  3. [3]

    Akimoto, J.-H

    T. Akimoto, J.-H. Jeon, R. Metzler, T. Miyaguchi, T. Uneyama, and E. Yamamoto, Reports on Progress in Physics89, 014602 (2026)

    2026

  4. [4]

    P. S. Laplace, M´ emoire de l’acad´ emie royale des sciences (1774)

  5. [5]

    P. S. Laplace, M´ emoires de l’Acad´ emie Royale des sciences de Paris1778(1781)

  6. [6]

    Y. Yuan, Z. Zeng, Y. Xing, H. Yuan, S. Zhang, W. Kob, and Y. Wang, Nature Communications15, 3866 (2024)

    2024

  7. [7]

    C. Zu, F. Machado, B. Ye, S. Choi, B. Kobrin, T. Mittiga, S. Hsieh, P. Bhattacharyya, M. Markham, D. Twitchen,et al., Nature597, 45 (2021)

    2021

  8. [8]

    Kumar and S

    A. Kumar and S. Daschakraborty, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics25, 31431 (2023)

    2023

Show all 94 references
  1. [9]

    Witzel, M

    P. Witzel, M. G¨ otz, Y. Lanoisel´ ee, T. Franosch, D. S. Grebenkov, and D. Heinrich, Biophysical journal117, 203 (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    A. G. Cherstvy, S. Thapa, C. E. Wagner, and R. Metzler, Soft Matter15, 2526 (2019)

    2019

  3. [11]

    H. Yi, D. Gong, M. K. Daddysman, M. Renn, and N. F. Scherer, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B128, 6246 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    M. Hu, H. Chen, H. Wang, S. Burov, E. Barkai, and D. Wang, ACS nano17, 21708 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    C. Xue, X. Shi, Y. Tian, X. Zheng, and G. Hu, Nano Letters20, 3895 (2020)

    2020

  6. [14]

    Mej´ ıa-Monasterio, S

    C. Mej´ ıa-Monasterio, S. Nechaev, G. Oshanin, and O. Vasilyev, New Journal of Physics22, 033024 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    Schramma, C

    N. Schramma, C. P. Isra¨ els, and M. Jalaal, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences120, e2216497120 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    T. J. Lampo, S. Stylianidou, M. P. Backlund, P. A. Wiggins, and A. J. Spakowitz, Biophysical Journal112, 532 (2017)

    2017

  9. [17]

    Toyota, D

    T. Toyota, D. A. Head, C. F. Schmidt, and D. Mizuno, Soft Matter7, 3234 (2011)

    2011

  10. [18]

    Stuhrmann, M

    B. Stuhrmann, M. Soares e Silva, M. Depken, F. C. MacKintosh, and G. H. Koenderink, Phys. Rev. E86, 020901 (2012)

    2012

  11. [19]

    M. S. e Silva, B. Stuhrmann, T. Betz, and G. H. Koenderink, New Journal of Physics16, 075010 (2014)

    2014

  12. [20]

    E. R. Weeks, J. Crocker, A. C. Levitt, A. Schofield, and D. Weitz, Science287, 627 (2000)

    2000

  13. [21]

    K. C. Leptos, J. S. Guasto, J. P. Gollub, A. I. Pesci, and R. E. Goldstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.103, 198103 (2009)

    2009

  14. [22]

    Stylianidou, N

    S. Stylianidou, N. J. Kuwada, and P. A. Wiggins, Biophysical Journal107, 2684 (2014)

    2014

  15. [23]

    R. K. Singh, J. Mahato, A. Chowdhury, A. Sain, and A. Nandi, The Journal of Chemical Physics152, 024903 (2020)

    2020

  16. [24]

    Srinivasan, V

    H. Srinivasan, V. K. Sharma, and S. Mitra, Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics26, 29227 (2024)

    2024

  17. [25]

    K. Shin, S. Song, Y. H. Song, S. Hahn, J.-H. Kim, G. Lee, I.-C. Jeong, J. Sung, and K. T. Lee, The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters10, 3071 (2019)

    2019

  18. [26]

    B. Wang, S. M. Anthony, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences106, 15160 (2009)

    2009

  19. [27]

    B. Wang, J. Kuo, S. C. Bae, and S. Granick, Nature materials11, 481 (2012)

    2012

  20. [28]

    Rusciano, R

    F. Rusciano, R. Pastore, and F. Greco, Phys. Rev. Lett.128, 168001 (2022)

    2022

  21. [29]

    Perego, D

    A. Perego, D. Lazarenko, M. Cloitre, and F. Khabaz, Macromolecules55, 7605 (2022)

    2022

  22. [30]

    Chakraborty and Y

    I. Chakraborty and Y. Roichman, Physical Review Research2, 022020 (2020)

    2020

  23. [31]

    J. Guan, B. Wang, and S. Granick, ACS nano8, 3331 (2014)

    2014

  24. [32]

    Pastore, A

    R. Pastore, A. Ciarlo, G. Pesce, F. Greco, and A. Sasso, Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021)

    2021

  25. [33]

    Pastore, A

    R. Pastore, A. Ciarlo, G. Pesce, A. Sasso, and F. Greco, Soft Matter18(2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    T. A. Waigh and N. Korabel, Reports on Progress in Physics86, 126601 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    Chaudhuri, L

    P. Chaudhuri, L. Berthier, and W. Kob, Phys. Rev. Lett.99, 060604 (2007)

    2007

  28. [36]

    Joung, D

    H. Joung, D. Kang, J. Yu, I. Cho, S. Lee, K. Paeng, and J. Yang, Macromolecules58, 877 (2025)

    2025

  29. [37]

    ˚Aberg and B

    C. ˚Aberg and B. Poolman, Biophysical Journal120, 2355 (2021)

    2021

  30. [38]

    Corci, O

    B. Corci, O. Hooiveld, A. M. Dolga, and C. ˚Aberg, Soft Matter19, 2529 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    J. M. Miotto, S. Pigolotti, A. V. Chechkin, and S. Rold´ an-Vargas, Phys. Rev. X11, 031002 (2021)

    2021

  32. [40]

    J. Wang, W. Deng, M. Hu, Y. Zhao, B. Peng, and D. Wang, Macromolecular Rapid Communications , e00477 (2025)

    2025

  33. [41]

    Hidalgo-Soria, W

    M. Hidalgo-Soria, W. Nicola, Y. Haddad, E. Barkai, S. Burov, and Y. Garini, Biophysical Journal125, 1 (2026). 17

    2026

  34. [42]

    M. V. Chubynsky and G. W. Slater, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 098302 (2014)

    2014

  35. [43]

    Yamamoto, T

    E. Yamamoto, T. Akimoto, A. Mitsutake, and R. Metzler, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 128101 (2021)

    2021

  36. [44]

    Hidalgo-Soria, E

    M. Hidalgo-Soria, E. Barkai, and S. Burov, Entropy23, 231 (2021)

    2021

  37. [45]

    A. V. Chechkin, F. Seno, R. Metzler, and I. M. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. X7, 021002 (2017)

    2017

  38. [46]

    Baldovin, E

    F. Baldovin, E. Orlandini, and F. Seno, Frontiers in Physics7, 124 (2019)

    2019

  39. [47]

    E. W. Montroll and G. H. Weiss, Journal of Mathematical Physics6, 167 (1965)

    1965

  40. [48]

    Barkai, Chemical Physics284, 13 (2002)

    E. Barkai, Chemical Physics284, 13 (2002)

    2002

  41. [49]

    Dybiec and E

    B. Dybiec and E. Gudowska-Nowak, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science20, 043129 (2010)

    2010

  42. [50]

    Ku´ smierz and E

    L. Ku´ smierz and E. Gudowska-Nowak, Physical Review E99, 052116 (2019)

    2019

  43. [51]

    Aghion, D

    E. Aghion, D. A. Kessler, and E. Barkai, The European Physical Journal B91, 17 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Kutner and J

    R. Kutner and J. Masoliver, The European Physical Journal B90, 50 (2017)

    2017

  45. [53]

    Metzler and J

    R. Metzler and J. Klafter, Physics Reports339, 1 (2000)

    2000

  46. [54]

    Shafir and S

    D. Shafir and S. Burov, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment3, 033301 (2022)

    2022

  47. [55]

    Burov, R

    S. Burov, R. Metzler, and E. Barkai, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences107, 13228 (2010)

    2010

  48. [56]

    Klafter and I

    J. Klafter and I. M. Sokolov,First steps in random walks: from tools to applications(Oxford University Press, 2011)

    2011

  49. [57]

    Vitali, P

    S. Vitali, P. Paradisi, and G. Pagnini, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical55, 224012 (2022)

    2022

  50. [58]

    Luo, J.-D

    X. Luo, J.-D. Bao, and W.-Y. Fan, Phys. Rev. E109, 014130 (2024)

    2024

  51. [59]

    Defaveri and E

    L. Defaveri and E. Barkai, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.05585 (2025)

    2025

  52. [60]

    Burov, W

    S. Burov, W. Wang, and E. Barkai, arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.03410 (2022)

    2022

  53. [61]

    W. Wang, E. Barkai, and S. Burov, Entropy22, 697 (2020)

    2020

  54. [62]

    Barkai and S

    E. Barkai and S. Burov, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 060603 (2020)

    2020

  55. [63]

    Touchette, Physics Reports478, 1 (2009)

    H. Touchette, Physics Reports478, 1 (2009)

    2009

  56. [64]

    S. N. Majumdar and M. Vergassola, Phys. Rev. Lett.102, 060601 (2009)

    2009

  57. [65]

    P. L. Krapivsky, K. Mallick, and T. Sadhu, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 078101 (2014)

    2014

  58. [66]

    Hegde, S

    C. Hegde, S. Sabhapandit, and A. Dhar, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 120601 (2014)

    2014

  59. [67]

    Nickelsen and H

    D. Nickelsen and H. Touchette, Phys. Rev. Lett.121(2018)

    2018

  60. [68]

    Derrida, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P07023 (2007)

    B. Derrida, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P07023 (2007)

    2007

  61. [69]

    du Buisson and H

    J. du Buisson and H. Touchette, Physical Review E107, 054111 (2023)

    2023

  62. [70]

    Pacheco-Pozo and I

    A. Pacheco-Pozo and I. M. Sokolov, Phys. Rev. E103, 042116 (2021)

    2021

  63. [71]

    Defaveri, E

    L. Defaveri, E. Barkai, and D. A. Kessler, Phys. Rev. E109, L022102 (2024)

    2024

  64. [72]

    Lugannani and S

    R. Lugannani and S. Rice,Saddle point approximation for the distribution of the sum of independent random variables, Vol. 12 (Cambridge University Press, 1980)

    1980

  65. [73]

    Bassanoni and O

    A. Bassanoni and O. Hamdi, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2026, 053202 (2026)

    2026

  66. [74]

    Bassanoni, A

    A. Bassanoni, A. Vezzani, and R. Burioni, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science34, 083144 (2024)

    2024

  67. [75]

    R. K. Singh and S. Burov, Phys. Rev. E108, L052102 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    J. H. P. Schulz, E. Barkai, and R. Metzler, Phys. Rev. X4, 011028 (2014)

    2014

  69. [77]

    Godreche and J

    C. Godreche and J. Luck, Journal of Statistical Physics104, 489 (2001)

    2001

  70. [78]

    Akimoto, Phys

    T. Akimoto, Phys. Rev. E108, 054113 (2023)

    2023

  71. [79]

    Burov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00381 (2020)

    S. Burov, arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.00381 (2020)

    2007

  72. [80]

    D. R. Cox,Renewal theory(Methuen, London, 1962)

    1962

  73. [81]

    Wang and S

    W. Wang and S. Burov, Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science36, 043133 (2026)

    2026

  74. [82]

    Ellettari, G

    E. Ellettari, G. Nasuti, A. Bassanoni, A. Vezzani, and R. Burioni, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.09452 (2025)

    2025

  75. [83]

    Feller,An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Volume 2(John Wiley & Sons, 1991)

    W. Feller,An introduction to probability theory and its applications, Volume 2(John Wiley & Sons, 1991)

    1991

  76. [84]

    W. Wang, J. H. P. Schulz, W. Deng, and E. Barkai, Phys. Rev. E98, 042139 (2018)

    2018

  77. [85]

    G. H. Weiss,Aspects and applications of the random walk(North-Holland: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1994)

    1994

  78. [86]

    Debiossac, N

    M. Debiossac, N. Kiesel, and E. Lutz, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 047101 (2024)

    2024

  79. [87]

    Forbes, M

    C. Forbes, M. Evans, N. Hastings, and B. Peacock,Statistical distributions(John Wiley & Sons, 2011)

    2011

  80. [88]

    Einsteinet al., Annalen der physik17, 208 (1905)

    A. Einsteinet al., Annalen der physik17, 208 (1905)

    1905

  81. [89]

    Bochner and K

    S. Bochner and K. Chandrasekharan,Fourier transforms(Princeton University Press, 1949)

    1949

  82. [90]

    R. M. Corless, G. H. Gonnet, D. E. Hare, D. J. Jeffrey, and D. E. Knuth, Advances in Computational mathematics5, 329 (1996)

    1996

  83. [91]

    Forβ= 2 the results presented here are identical to those in [61]

  84. [92]

    Lecomte and J

    V. Lecomte and J. Tailleur, Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2007, P03004 (2007)

    2007

  85. [93]

    Giardin` a, J

    C. Giardin` a, J. Kurchan, and L. Peliti, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 120603 (2006)

    2006

  86. [94]

    Thapa, A

    S. Thapa, A. Wy loma´ nska, G. Sikora, C. E. Wagner, D. Krapf, H. Kantz, A. V. Chechkin, and R. Metzler, New Journal of Physics23, 013008 (2021)

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.