pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24755 · v1 · pith:I3B4ZLQJnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el · cond-mat.supr-con

On Degeneracies of Density, Magnetic, and Pairing Responses: How Competing Orders Echo Underlying Symmetries in the Hubbard Model

Michael Meixner , Herbert E{\ss}l , Matthias Reitner , Alessandro Toschi , Thomas Sch\"afer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el cond-mat.supr-con
keywords Hubbard modelpseudospin symmetryresponse functionscompeting ordersd-wave pairingdensity wavemetal-insulator transition
0
0 comments X

The pith

Pseudospin symmetry in the unfrustrated bipartite Hubbard model enforces exact relations between its charge, spin, and pairing susceptibilities at arbitrary wavevectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the Hubbard model's pseudospin symmetry on an unfrustrated bipartite lattice produces direct mappings between density, magnetic, and pairing response functions. These mappings hold for any spatial modulation and therefore govern competitions such as those between stripe and superconducting orders. Two-particle simulations then locate a simultaneous d-wave pairing and d-density-wave instability near the metal-insulator transition that is driven by short-range spin fluctuations. The same symmetry relations are shown to be lifted once geometrical frustration is introduced, which tilts the balance toward superconductivity.

Core claim

The unfrustrated bipartite Hubbard model possesses a pseudospin symmetry that directly enforces mutual relations between charge, spin, and pairing susceptibilities for generic spatial modulations; numerical evidence shows this symmetry produces a joint d-wave pairing / d-density-wave instability near the metal-insulator transition in two dimensions.

What carries the argument

Pseudospin symmetry, which rotates between particle and hole operators on the bipartite lattice and thereby maps the different response channels onto one another.

If this is right

  • The derived relations between susceptibilities apply to any wavevector and therefore constrain the competition between stripe and superconducting orders.
  • A simultaneous d-wave pairing and d-density-wave (loop-current) instability appears near the metal-insulator transition and is driven by short-ranged spin fluctuations.
  • Geometrical frustration gradually lifts the degeneracy and favors superconductivity over the density-wave channel.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry-based relations could be tested in other lattice models that retain a similar particle-hole mapping.
  • Material searches might target compounds whose effective models are close to the unfrustrated bipartite limit to look for the predicted near-degeneracy of orders.
  • The relations provide a benchmark that any approximate many-body method must satisfy when applied to the Hubbard model.

Load-bearing premise

The lattice is unfrustrated and bipartite, preserving an exact pseudospin symmetry that relates the response functions.

What would settle it

A direct computation of the charge and pairing susceptibilities at a common wavevector in the square-lattice Hubbard model that violates the analytically derived equality between those two channels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24755 by Alessandro Toschi, Herbert E{\ss}l, Matthias Reitner, Michael Meixner, Thomas Sch\"afer.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Exact symmetry relations between pairing, charge and spin response functions with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: b). In this situation, the term 1/t 2 eff (black line) acts as a critical threshold for the instability. In fact, when it gets exactly canceled by the corresponding projection of the inverse generalized susceptibility of the impurity (green o-marker) at Tc, it triggers the divergence of the physical lattice susceptibility (red dot) and, thus, the associated thermodynamic phase transition. Within this frame… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Strongly correlated electron systems often display competing or even intertwined ordering tendencies, hinting to extremely close or degenerate many-electron energies. While degeneracies are directly rooted in the underlying symmetries of the problem under investigation, their multifaceted effects on different response functions and their mutual relations often remain elusive. Here we put this subject on a rigorous basis by investigating the degeneracies of charge, spin, and pairing susceptibilities for the unfrustrated, bipartite Hubbard model. Exploiting its pseudospin symmetry, we analytically derive the mutual relations between these response functions for generic spatial modulations, highly relevant, e.g., for the competition of stripe and superconducting orders. By means of two-particle numerical simulations we demonstrate the occurrence of a simultaneous $d$-wave pairing/$d$-density wave (loop current) instability in the vicinity of the metal-insulator transition, driven by short-ranged spin fluctuations for the two-dimensional case. We show how this degeneracy is gradually lifted by geometrical frustration, which favors superconductivity. Our study provides a general tool for revealing symmetry relations in correlated electron systems and establishes a unifying perspective on the nature of their intermingled charge/loop current, pairing, and spin orders.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the pseudospin (charge SU(2)) symmetry of the half-filled unfrustrated bipartite Hubbard model enforces exact mutual relations among charge-density, spin, and pairing susceptibilities for arbitrary spatial modulations Q. These relations are derived analytically and shown to imply degeneracies between, e.g., d-wave pairing and d-density-wave (loop-current) responses. Two-particle numerical simulations are used to demonstrate a simultaneous d-wave pairing / d-density-wave instability near the metal-insulator transition in 2D, driven by short-range spin fluctuations, with the degeneracy lifted by geometrical frustration in favor of superconductivity.

Significance. If the central relations hold, the work supplies a parameter-free, symmetry-based tool that directly links competing orders without fitted parameters or self-referential assumptions. The analytical mapping from pseudospin symmetry to response-function degeneracies for generic Q is a clear strength, as is the explicit demonstration that frustration lifts the degeneracy. This provides a unifying perspective on intertwined charge/loop-current, pairing, and spin orders and is directly relevant to stripe-superconductivity competition.

minor comments (3)
  1. [§3] §3 (numerical methods): the two-particle solver (DCA, DMFT+2P, or other) and the momentum discretization used for the 2D simulations should be stated explicitly in the main text rather than only in the supplement, to allow immediate assessment of the approximation level.
  2. [Fig. 4] Fig. 4 caption: the temperature and interaction values at which the simultaneous instability is reported should be listed numerically in the caption for quick reference.
  3. [Eq. (12)] Eq. (12): the definition of the form factor for the d-density-wave operator should include an explicit statement that it is normalized identically to the d-wave pairing form factor, to make the degeneracy manifest without cross-reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript, the accurate summary of its central results, and the recommendation to accept. The referee correctly identifies the symmetry-based relations and their implications for competing orders.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation from standard model symmetry

full rationale

The paper's central analytic step exploits the pseudospin (charge SU(2)) symmetry of the half-filled unfrustrated bipartite Hubbard model to derive exact mutual relations among charge, spin, and pairing susceptibilities for arbitrary wavevectors. This symmetry is a rigorously established, external property of the model Hamiltonian and is not constructed or fitted within the paper. Numerical demonstrations of simultaneous instabilities follow directly as consequences without parameter fitting or self-referential predictions. No self-citation load-bearing steps, ansatze smuggled via citation, or reductions of predictions to inputs by construction are present. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the pseudospin symmetry of the unfrustrated bipartite Hubbard model and the applicability of two-particle numerical methods; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The unfrustrated bipartite Hubbard model possesses pseudospin symmetry.
    Invoked to analytically derive mutual relations between response functions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5771 in / 1250 out tokens · 25381 ms · 2026-06-25T22:15:31.496475+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

120 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    S. Sachdev,Quantum Phase Transitions(Cambridge University Press, 1999)

    1999

  2. [2]

    H. v. L¨ ohneysen, A. Rosch, M. Vojta, and P. W¨ olfle, Fermi-liquid instabilities at magnetic quantum phase transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys.79, 1015 (2007)

    2007

  3. [3]

    Brando, D

    M. Brando, D. Belitz, F. M. Grosche, and T. R. Kirk- patrick, Metallic quantum ferromagnets, Rev. Mod. Phys. 88, 025006 (2016)

    2016

  4. [4]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Quantum spin liquids: a re- view, Reports on Progress in Physics80, 016502 (2017), arXiv:1601.03742 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  5. [5]

    Kaminski, S

    A. Kaminski, S. Rosenkranz, H. Fretwell, J. Campuzano, Z. Li, H. Raffy, W. Cullen, H. You, C. Olson, C. Varma, and H. H¨ ochst, Spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry in the pseudogap state of a high-tc supercon- ductor, Nature416, 610–613 (2002)

    2002

  6. [6]

    Fradkin, S

    E. Fradkin, S. A. Kivelson, and J. M. Tranquada, Collo- quium: Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.87, 457 (2015)

    2015

  7. [7]

    L. L. Viteritti, R. Rende, C. Roth, A. Sengupta, G. Car- leo, and A. Georges, Beyond Variational Bias: Resolv- ing Intertwined Orders in the Hubbard Model (2026), arXiv:2604.21978 [cond-mat.str-el]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  8. [8]

    Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London

    J. Hubbard, Electron Correlations in Narrow Energy Bands, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences276, 238 (1963)

    1963

  9. [10]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, The Hubbard Model, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics13, 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 031620-102024 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev- conmatphys-031620-102024

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys- 2022

  10. [11]

    E. W. Huang, C. B. Mendl, H.-C. Jiang, B. Moritz, and T. P. Devereaux, Stripe order from the perspec- tive of the Hubbard model, npj Quantum Materials3, 10.1038/s41535-018-0097-0 (2018)

    work page doi:10.1038/s41535-018-0097-0 2018

  11. [13]

    Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with par- tially filled stripes in the hubbard model, Science384, 10.1126/science.adh7691 (2024)

    H. Xu, C.-M. Chung, M. Qin, U. Schollw¨ ock, S. R. White, and S. Zhang, Coexistence of superconductivity with partially filled stripes in the Hubbard model, Science 384, 10.1126/science.adh7691 (2024)

    work page doi:10.1126/science.adh7691 2024

  12. [14]

    S. Chakravarty, Quantum oscillations and key theoretical issues in high temperature superconductors from the perspective of density waves, Reports on Progress in Physics74, 022501 (2011)

    2011

  13. [15]

    Jiang and T

    H.-C. Jiang and T. Devereaux, Superconductivity in the doped Hubbard model and its interplay with next-nearest hopping t’, Science365(2019)

    2019

  14. [16]

    Y. Wang, D. F. Agterberg, and A. Chubukov, Inter- play between pair- and charge-density-wave orders in underdoped cuprates, Phys. Rev. B91, 115103 (2015)

    2015

  15. [17]

    Lao and T

    J. Lao and T. Zhou, Corner flat bands induced by d density wave and partial corner state modification due to competition with d-wave superconductivity, Phys. Rev. B111, 075169 (2025)

    2025

  16. [18]

    Wietek, Y.-Y

    A. Wietek, Y.-Y. He, S. R. White, A. Georges, and E. M. Stoudenmire, Stripes, Antiferromagnetism, and the Pseudogap in the Doped Hubbard Model at Finite Temperature (2020), arXiv:2009.10736 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2020

  17. [19]

    Scholle, M

    R. Scholle, M. Bonetti, W. Metzner, and D. Vilardi, Coexisting magnetic, charge, and superconducting or- ders in the two-dimensional Hubbard model (2026), arXiv:2602.20073

    arXiv 2026

  18. [20]

    P. Worm, M. Reitner, K. Held, and A. Toschi, Fermi and luttinger arcs: Two concepts, realized on one surface, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 166501 (2024)

    2024

  19. [21]

    Adler, D

    S. Adler, D. R. Fus, M. O. Malcolms, A. Vock, K. Held, A. A. Katanin, T. Sch¨ afer, and A. Toschi, Magnetic quantum criticality: dynamical mean-field perspective (2024), arXiv:2409.04308 [cond-mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2024

  20. [22]

    Rampon, F

    L. Rampon, F. ˇSimkovic, and M. Ferrero, Magnetic phase diagram of the three-dimensional doped hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 066502 (2025)

    2025

  21. [23]

    J. P. F. LeBlanc, A. E. Antipov, F. Becca, I. W. Bulik, G. K.-L. Chan, C.-M. Chung, Y. Deng, M. Ferrero, T. M. Henderson, C. A. Jim´ enez-Hoyos, E. Kozik, X.- W. Liu, A. J. Millis, N. V. Prokof’ev, M. Qin, G. E. Scuseria, H. Shi, B. V. Svistunov, L. F. Tocchio, I. S. Tupitsyn, S. R. White, S. Zhang, B.-X. Zheng, Z. Zhu, and E. Gull (Simons Collaboration o...

    2015

  22. [24]

    Sch¨ afer, N

    T. Sch¨ afer, N. Wentzell, F.ˇSimkovic, Y.-Y. He, C. Hille, M. Klett, C. J. Eckhardt, B. Arzhang, V. Harkov, F. Le R´ egent, A. Kirsch, Y. Wang, A. J. Kim, E. Kozik, E. A. Stepanov, A. Kauch, S. Andergassen, P. Hansmann, D. Rohe, Y. M. Vilk, J. P. F. LeBlanc, S. Zhang, A.- M. S. Tremblay, M. Ferrero, O. Parcollet, and A. Georges, Tracking the Footprints o...

    2021

  23. [25]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL will be inserted by publisher] for additional details on the model, derivations, and numerical results

  24. [26]

    Zhang, Pseudospin symmetry and new collective modes of the Hubbard model, Phys

    S. Zhang, Pseudospin symmetry and new collective modes of the Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.65, 120 (1990)

    1990

  25. [27]

    Keller, W

    M. Keller, W. Metzner, and U. Schollw¨ ock, Dynamical Mean-Field Theory for Pairing and Spin Gap in the Attractive Hubbard Model, Phys. Rev. Lett.86, 4612 (2001)

    2001

  26. [28]

    Chakravarty, R

    S. Chakravarty, R. B. Laughlin, D. K. Morr, and C. Nayak, Hidden order in the cuprates, Phys. Rev. B63, 094503 (2001)

    2001

  27. [29]

    Kotliar, S

    G. Kotliar, S. Y. Savrasov, G. P´ alsson, and G. Biroli, Cellular Dynamical Mean Field Approach to Strongly Correlated Systems, Phys. Rev. Lett.87, 186401 (2001)

    2001

  28. [30]

    Meixner, M

    M. Meixner, M. Reitner, T. Sch¨ afer, and A. Toschi, Non- perturbative effects of short-range spatial correlations at the two-particle level (2026), arXiv:2512.17716 [cond- mat.str-el]

    arXiv 2026

  29. [31]

    Hubbard, Thermodynamic Properties of the One- Dimensional Half-Filled-Band Hubbard Model

    H. Hubbard, Thermodynamic Properties of the One- Dimensional Half-Filled-Band Hubbard Model. II, Progress of Theoretical Physics48, 2171 (1972)

    1972

  30. [32]

    R. R. P. Singh and R. T. Scalettar, Exact demonstra- tion of η pairing in the ground state of an attractive-U Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett.66, 3203 (1991)

    1991

  31. [33]

    H. Eßl, M. Reitner, G. Sangiovanni, and A. Toschi, Gen- eral Shiba mapping for on-site four-point correlation functions, Phys. Rev. Res.6, 033061 (2024)

    2024

  32. [34]

    Shen and X

    S.-Q. Shen and X. C. Xie, Pseudospin SU(2)-symmetry breaking, charge-density waves and superconductivity in the Hubbard model, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter8, 4805 (1996)

    1996

  33. [35]

    Yang and S

    C. Yang and S. Zhang, SO4 symmetry in a Hubbard model, Modern Physics Letters B04, 759 (1990)

    1990

  34. [36]

    Pu and S.-Q

    F.-C. Pu and S.-Q. Shen, Relation between pseudospin- rotation invariance and a supersolid, Phys. Rev. B50, 16086 (1994)

    1994

  35. [37]

    Scaletter, Understanding the Hubbard Model with Simple Calculations, inCorrelations and Phase Transi- tions: Modeling and Simulation, Vol

    R. Scaletter, Understanding the Hubbard Model with Simple Calculations, inCorrelations and Phase Transi- tions: Modeling and Simulation, Vol. 14 (Forschungszen- trum J¨ ulich, 2024) Chap. 3

    2024

  36. [38]

    J. M. P. Carmelo, Exact results for the Hubbard model on bipartite lattices in spatial dimensions d> 1: Seven theorems from the full [SU(2)×SU(2)×U(1)]/Z2 2 sym- metry, Phys. Rev. B113, 155157 (2026)

    2026

  37. [39]

    (6) by Fourier transforms, where pp and ph sectors are subject to different Fourier conventions [52, 96](see Sec

    This momentum space equation is related to the real- space Eq. (6) by Fourier transforms, where pp and ph sectors are subject to different Fourier conventions [52, 96](see Sec. II of [ 41]) to implement the adequate operator ordering

  38. [40]

    Corresponding to the truncated unity expansion [97]

  39. [41]

    Affleck and J

    I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Large-n limit of the Heisenberg-Hubbard model: Implications for high- Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. B37, 3774 (1988)

    1988

  40. [42]

    Nayak, O(4)-invariant formulation of the nodal liquid, Phys

    C. Nayak, O(4)-invariant formulation of the nodal liquid, Phys. Rev. B62, R6135 (2000)

    2000

  41. [43]

    Chakravarty, Theory of the d-density wave from a vertex model and its implications, Phys

    S. Chakravarty, Theory of the d-density wave from a vertex model and its implications, Phys. Rev. B66, 224505 (2002)

    2002

  42. [44]

    Leeb and J

    V. Leeb and J. Knolle, Collinear p-wave magnetism and hidden orbital ferrimagnetism (2026)

    2026

  43. [45]

    We note that an alike relation of d-DW and pairing instability has been discussed in the different context of the t−J model [88, 98] and, recently, the σz-Hubbard model [99]

  44. [46]

    Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys

    P. Anderson, Localized magnetic states in metals, Phys. Rev.124, 41 (1961)

    1961

  45. [47]

    E. G. C. P. van Loon and H. U. R. Strand, Dual Bethe- Salpeter equation for the multiorbital lattice suscepti- bility within dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B 109, 155157 (2024). 8

    2024

  46. [48]

    Jarrell, T

    M. Jarrell, T. Maier, C. Huscroft, and S. Moukouri, Quantum Monte Carlo algorithm for nonlocal corrections to the dynamical mean-field theory, Phys. Rev. B64, 195130 (2001)

    2001

  47. [49]

    Georges and W

    A. Georges and W. Krauth, Numerical solution of the d=∞ Hubbard model: Evidence for a Mott transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 1240 (1992)

    1992

  48. [50]

    Kotliar, E

    G. Kotliar, E. Lange, and M. J. Rozenberg, Landau Theory of the Finite Temperature Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 5180 (2000)

    2000

  49. [51]

    The 2×2 CDMFT cell is sufficient to capture the d−wave instability, consequently, the BSE-superlattice vector is set to 0

  50. [52]

    H. Park, K. Haule, and G. Kotliar, Cluster Dynamical Mean Field Theory of the Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 186403 (2008)

    2008

  51. [53]

    Fratino, P

    L. Fratino, P. S´ emon, G. Sordi, and A. M. S. Tremblay, An organizing principle for two-dimensional strongly correlated superconductivity, Scientific Reports6, 22715 (2016)

    2016

  52. [54]

    C. M. Varma, Non-Fermi-liquid states and pairing insta- bility of a general model of copper oxide metals, Phys. Rev. B55, 14554 (1997)

    1997

  53. [55]

    C. M. Varma, Pseudogap Phase and the Quantum- Critical Point in Copper-Oxide Metals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 3538 (1999)

    1999

  54. [56]

    P. Goswami, A theoretical approach to pseudogap and su- perconducting transitions in hole-doped cuprates, Inter- national Scholarly Research Notices2013, 210384 (2013), https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1155/2013/210384

    work page doi:10.1155/2013/210384 2013

  55. [57]

    Nayak, Density-wave states of nonzero angular mo- mentum, Phys

    C. Nayak, Density-wave states of nonzero angular mo- mentum, Phys. Rev. B62, 4880 (2000)

    2000

  56. [58]

    N. D. Mermin and H. Wagner, Absence of Ferro- magnetism or Antiferromagnetism in One- or Two- Dimensional Isotropic Heisenberg Models, Phys. Rev. Lett.17, 1307 (1966)

    1966

  57. [59]

    P. C. Hohenberg, Existence of Long-Range Order in One and Two Dimensions, Phys. Rev.158, 383 (1967)

    1967

  58. [60]

    Dar´ e, Y

    A.-M. Dar´ e, Y. M. Vilk, and A. M. S. Tremblay, Crossover from two- to three-dimensional critical be- havior for nearly antiferromagnetic itinerant electrons, Phys. Rev. B53, 14236 (1996)

    1996

  59. [61]

    Y. M. Vilk and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Non-Perturbative Many-Body Approach to the Hubbard Model and Single- Particle Pseudogap, J. Phys. I France7, 1309 (1997)

    1997

  60. [62]

    Sch¨ afer, F

    T. Sch¨ afer, F. Geles, D. Rost, G. Rohringer, E. Arrigoni, K. Held, N. Bl¨ umer, M. Aichhorn, and A. Toschi, Fate of the false Mott-Hubbard transition in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B91, 125109 (2015)

    2015

  61. [63]

    Mußhoff, A

    J. Mußhoff, A. Kiani, and E. Pavarini, Magnetic response trends in cuprates and the t−t ′ Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B103, 075136 (2021)

    2021

  62. [64]

    Krien, A

    F. Krien, A. Valli, and M. Capone, Single-boson ex- change decomposition of the vertex function, Phys. Rev. B100, 155149 (2019)

    2019

  63. [65]

    P. M. Bonetti, A. Toschi, C. Hille, S. Andergassen, and D. Vilardi, Single-boson exchange representation of the functional renormalization group for strongly interacting many-electron systems, Phys. Rev. Res.4, 013034 (2022)

    2022

  64. [66]

    smoking gun

    S. Adler, F. Krien, P. Chalupa-Gantner, G. Sangiovanni, and A. Toschi, Non-perturbative intertwining between spin and charge correlations: A “smoking gun” single- boson-exchange result, SciPost Phys.16, 054 (2024)

    2024

  65. [67]

    Gievers,Functional approaches to Fermi polarons in cold atomic gases and solid-state systems, Ph.D

    M. Gievers,Functional approaches to Fermi polarons in cold atomic gases and solid-state systems, Ph.D. thesis, Ludwig-Maximilians Universit¨ at M¨ unchen (2025)

    2025

  66. [68]

    This corresponds to applying the SBE decomposition to the two-particle irreducible vertex Γ pp [46, 100]

  67. [69]

    Meixner, M

    M. Meixner, M. Kr¨ amer, N. Wentzell, P. M. Bonetti, S. Andergassen, A. Toschi, and T. Sch¨ afer, Disentan- gling real space fluctuations: The diagnostics of metal- insulator transitions beyond single-particle spectral func- tions, Physical Review Research7, 10.1103/1nt5-swsk (2025)

    work page doi:10.1103/1nt5-swsk 2025

  68. [70]

    Kyung, J.-S

    B. Kyung, J.-S. Landry, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Antifer- romagnetic fluctuations and d-wave superconductivity in electron-doped high-temperature superconductors, Phys. Rev. B68, 174502 (2003)

    2003

  69. [71]

    S. S. Kancharla, B. Kyung, D. S´ en´ echal, M. Civelli, M. Capone, G. Kotliar, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Anoma- lous superconductivity and its competition with antifer- romagnetism in doped Mott insulators, Phys. Rev. B77, 184516 (2008)

    2008

  70. [72]

    Kotliar, Resonating valence bonds and d-wave super- conductivity, Phys

    G. Kotliar, Resonating valence bonds and d-wave super- conductivity, Phys. Rev. B37, 3664 (1988)

    1988

  71. [73]

    Georges and G

    A. Georges and G. Kotliar, Hubbard model in infinite dimensions, Phys. Rev. B45, 6479 (1992)

    1992

  72. [74]

    Parcollet, G

    O. Parcollet, G. Biroli, and G. Kotliar, Cluster Dynami- cal Mean Field Analysis of the Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.92, 226402 (2004)

    2004

  73. [75]

    Surpassing the en- ergy resolution limit with ferromagnetic torque sensors,

    M. Reitner, P. Chalupa, L. Del Re, D. Springer, S. Ciuchi, G. Sangiovanni, and A. Toschi, Attractive Effect of a Strong Electronic Repulsion: The Physics of Vertex Di- vergences, Physical Review Letters125, 10.1103/phys- revlett.125.196403 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1103/phys- 2020

  74. [76]

    Sordi, P

    G. Sordi, P. S´ emon, K. Haule, and A.-M. S. Tremblay, Strong Coupling Superconductivity, Pseudogap, and Mott Transition, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 216401 (2012)

    2012

  75. [77]

    Sordi, P

    G. Sordi, P. S´ emon, K. Haule, and A.-M. Tremblay, Pseudogap temperature as a Widom line in doped Mott insulators, Scientific reports2, 1 (2012)

    2012

  76. [78]

    Patricolo, M

    M. Patricolo, M. Gievers, K. Fraboulet, A. Al-Eryani, S. Heinzelmann, P. M. Bonetti, A. Toschi, D. Vilardi, and S. Andergassen, Single-boson exchange formulation of the Schwinger-Dyson equation and its application to the functional renormalization group, SciPost Phys.18, 078 (2025)

    2025

  77. [79]

    Fraboulet, A

    K. Fraboulet, A. Al-Eryani, S. Heinzelmann, A. Kauch, and S. Andergassen, Multiloop functional renormaliza- tion group from single bosons (2025), arXiv:2512.11190

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  78. [80]

    Rohringer,New routes towards a theoretical treatment of nonlocal electronic correlations, Ph.D

    G. Rohringer,New routes towards a theoretical treatment of nonlocal electronic correlations, Ph.D. thesis, Vienna University of Technology (2013)

    2013

  79. [81]

    Lichtenstein, D

    J. Lichtenstein, D. S´ anchez de la Pe˜ na, D. Rohe, E. Di Napoli, C. Honerkamp, and S. Maier, High-performance functional renormalization group calculations for inter- acting fermions, Computer Physics Communications213, 100 (2017)

    2017

  80. [82]

    Cappelluti and R

    E. Cappelluti and R. Zeyher, Interplay between super- conductivity and flux phase in the t−j model, Phys. Rev. B59, 6475 (1999)

    1999

Showing first 80 references.