pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.24801 · v1 · pith:OZLA6GIRnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-ph

Radiative Signature of New Scalar Boson Decays in the m_(ell ell γ) Spectrum at the LHC

Pramod Sharma , Arnav Chauhan , Mukesh Kumar , Andreas Crivellin , Sukanta Dutta , Rachid Mazini , Bruce Mellado This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 23:11 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords scalar resonanceradiative decayLHCmulti-lepton anomalies152 GeVW W gammatt gamma background
0
0 comments X

The pith

A 2.7 sigma excess appears in the dilepton-photon mass spectrum at 152 GeV, consistent with a narrow scalar decaying to W W gamma.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether a scalar resonance near 152 GeV, previously hinted at in gamma-gamma, Z-gamma and W-W channels, also shows up in its radiative decay to two W bosons plus a photon. The search uses the invariant mass of the dilepton-photon system in events containing b-jets and models the dominant background with recent CMS measurements of top-pair plus photon production. A localized excess is found at the expected mass with 2.7 sigma global significance, and the ratio of the radiative to non-radiative cross sections is measured as roughly 2 percent. A reader would care because this supplies an independent final state to test the resonance hypothesis and constrains possible beyond-Standard-Model enhancements to the radiative mode.

Core claim

The authors investigate the radiative decay S to W+ W- gamma in the context of multi-lepton anomalies and indications of a narrow scalar resonance at 152 plus or minus 1 GeV. Using the m_ℓℓγ spectrum in b-jet events and tt gamma background shapes from CMS differential cross-section data, they observe a localized excess compatible with the scalar hypothesis at 2.7 sigma global significance. The ratio sigma(S to W+ W- gamma) over sigma(S to W+ W-) is extracted as 2.14 plus or minus 0.77 percent, compatible with an enhanced radiative contribution in beyond-Standard-Model scenarios.

What carries the argument

The m_ℓℓγ invariant-mass distribution in b-jet-associated events, used to isolate a possible peak from S to W+ W- gamma against the tt gamma background shape.

If this is right

  • The excess adds support for the narrow resonance hypothesis across multiple decay channels.
  • The extracted 2.14 percent ratio shows the radiative mode is present at a level that may require physics beyond the Standard Model.
  • The analysis illustrates how existing differential cross-section measurements can be repurposed to search for radiative resonances in lepton-plus-photon final states.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining this result with the other reported channels could tighten constraints on the resonance production rate and couplings.
  • Higher-statistics LHC runs could test whether the same excess persists or grows in the radiative channel.
  • The measured ratio might guide model building toward scenarios with enhanced photon emission from the scalar.

Load-bearing premise

The background shape in the m_ℓℓγ spectrum near 152 GeV is accurately given by the cited CMS tt gamma differential cross-section measurement with no significant mismodeling or extra contributions that could create a fake localized excess.

What would settle it

An independent dataset or alternative background estimation that produces no excess at 152 GeV under the same event selection would falsify the resonance interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.24801 by Andreas Crivellin, Arnav Chauhan, Bruce Mellado, Mukesh Kumar, Pramod Sharma, Rachid Mazini, Sukanta Dutta.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Feynman diagram showing the decay [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Selection efficiencies (see text) for mass values [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: presents the χ 2 distribution as a function of the scalar mass mS. The minimum occurs at mS = 140 GeV, where χ 2 = 2.63, while the no-BSM hypothesis yields χ 2 = 10.21. At the 68% confidence level, the con￾straint on the scalar mass is mS = 140+35 −30 GeV. The rela￾tively wide confidence interval is primarily a consequence of the restricted phase space imposed by the requirement mℓℓ > 40 GeV, compounded by… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the radiative decay $S \to W^+W^-\gamma$ in the context of the multi-lepton anomalies and recent indications of a narrow scalar resonance near $m_S = 152 \pm 1~\text{GeV}$ in the $\gamma\gamma$, $Z\gamma$, and $W^+W^-$ channels at the Large Hadron Collider. These excesses arise in final states containing leptons, missing transverse momentum, and associated $b$-jets, and motivate a search for a corresponding localized excess in the invariant-mass spectrum of the dilepton--photon system, $m_{\ell\ell\gamma}$, in events with associated $b$-jets. We use recent CMS measurements of the ${t\bar{t}}\gamma$ differential cross sections~\cite{CMS:2025zbe} to study the $m_{\ell\ell\gamma}$ spectrum and perform a search for a scalar-resonance contribution. A localized excess is observed, compatible with the scalar-resonance hypothesis, with a global significance of $2.7\sigma$ at $m_S = 152~\text{GeV}$. This result provides additional support for the hypothesis of a narrow resonance. The ratio $\sigma(S \to W^+W^-\gamma)/\sigma(S \to W^+W^-) = (2.14 \pm 0.77)$\% is extracted. This value is compatible with an enhanced radiative contribution that could arise in scenarios beyond the Standard Model.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper investigates the radiative decay S → W⁺W⁻γ of a narrow scalar boson near 152 GeV motivated by multi-lepton anomalies. Using CMS ttγ differential cross-section data as a background template in the m_ℓℓγ spectrum (with b-jets), it reports a localized excess at m_S = 152 GeV with 2.7σ global significance. This is interpreted as additional support for the resonance hypothesis, and the ratio σ(S → W⁺W⁻γ)/σ(S → W⁺W⁻) = (2.14 ± 0.77)% is extracted.

Significance. If the background template accurately reproduces the shape with no unaccounted structure near 152 GeV and the significance calculation is robust, the result would provide modest incremental support for a narrow scalar in a radiative channel. The extracted ratio offers a quantitative handle on possible BSM enhancements. The analysis makes use of public CMS measurements, which is a positive aspect for reproducibility, though no machine-checked elements or falsifiable predictions beyond the reported excess are included.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of a 2.7σ global significance is presented without any description of the background parametrization (e.g., whether the CMS differential cross section is used directly or reweighted), the fit procedure, the m_ℓℓγ fit range, data-selection cuts, or systematic uncertainties; these details are load-bearing for evaluating whether the excess is genuine or an artifact.
  2. [Background modeling] Background modeling: The m_ℓℓγ spectrum is modeled solely from the cited CMS:2025zbe ttγ measurement with no mention of floating shape parameters, sideband validation, or checks for mismodeling in the 140–170 GeV window; a few-percent shape discrepancy in this region would directly affect both the reported significance and the extracted ratio of (2.14 ± 0.77)%.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'recent indications' from prior channels without a brief recap of the mass and width values used to fix m_S = 152 GeV in the present search.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We respond to each major comment below and have made revisions to improve the clarity and documentation of the analysis.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim of a 2.7σ global significance is presented without any description of the background parametrization (e.g., whether the CMS differential cross section is used directly or reweighted), the fit procedure, the m_ℓℓγ fit range, data-selection cuts, or systematic uncertainties; these details are load-bearing for evaluating whether the excess is genuine or an artifact.

    Authors: The abstract is a concise summary and cannot accommodate all technical details. The background is taken directly from the CMS ttγ differential cross-section measurement (no reweighting), the fit is performed over the m_ℓℓγ spectrum in events with b-jets, and the quoted significance incorporates the experimental uncertainties reported by CMS. These elements are described in Sections 2 and 3 of the manuscript. To address the concern, we have added a brief clause to the abstract indicating that the background template is the published CMS ttγ spectrum and that the fit is performed in the m_ℓℓγ distribution. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Background modeling] Background modeling: The m_ℓℓγ spectrum is modeled solely from the cited CMS:2025zbe ttγ measurement with no mention of floating shape parameters, sideband validation, or checks for mismodeling in the 140–170 GeV window; a few-percent shape discrepancy in this region would directly affect both the reported significance and the extracted ratio of (2.14 ± 0.77)%.

    Authors: The spectrum is modeled directly from the CMS ttγ differential cross-section measurement as a fixed, data-driven template; no shape parameters are floated in order to keep the background estimate independent of the signal hypothesis. We have added explicit documentation in the revised manuscript of sideband validation outside the 140–170 GeV window and direct comparisons that confirm the absence of significant mismodeling in the signal region. The systematic uncertainties quoted by CMS are propagated into both the significance and the extracted ratio. We agree that these checks should be stated clearly and have incorporated them. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Mass and context imported from overlapping prior publications creates moderate self-citation dependence

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "We investigate the radiative decay $S \to W^+W^-\gamma$ in the context of the multi-lepton anomalies and recent indications of a narrow scalar resonance near $m_S = 152 \pm 1~\text{GeV}$ in the $\gamma\gamma$, $Z\gamma$, and $W^+W^-$ channels at the Large Hadron Collider. These excesses arise in final states containing leptons, missing transverse momentum, and associated $b$-jets, and motivate a search for a corresponding localized excess in the invariant-mass spectrum of the dilepton--photon system, $m_{\ell\ell\gamma}$"

    The specific mass value 152 GeV and the motivation for targeting that exact location are imported from prior publications whose author lists overlap with the present paper; the claimed 'additional support' for the resonance hypothesis is therefore partly justified by self-citation rather than standing on fully independent external evidence.

full rationale

The paper's search is performed at a fixed mass taken directly from earlier claims by overlapping authors, and the interpretation as 'additional support' for the narrow resonance hypothesis therefore inherits dependence on those prior results. The new analysis itself applies an external CMS ttγ differential cross-section measurement as background template and reports an excess in independent data, so the central claim retains independent empirical content. No self-definitional equations, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, ansatz smuggling, or renaming of known results are present. The background-shape assumption is a standard modeling choice whose failure would affect the result but does not constitute circularity by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The claim depends on the existence of the postulated scalar S and on the assumption that the background is correctly modeled by the external CMS dataset; the mass value and ratio are fitted to data.

free parameters (2)
  • m_S = 152 GeV
    Mass fixed at 152 GeV from prior indications and used as the search point.
  • radiative ratio = 2.14 ± 0.77 %
    Cross-section ratio extracted from the fit to the observed excess.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The differential ttγ background in m_ℓℓγ is accurately described by the CMS measurement without new-physics contributions or mismodeling at 152 GeV.
    Invoked to attribute any localized excess to the scalar resonance rather than background.
invented entities (1)
  • Narrow scalar boson S no independent evidence
    purpose: To account for the multi-lepton anomalies and the observed m_ℓℓγ excess via radiative decays.
    Postulated new particle whose existence is inferred from data patterns; no independent falsifiable prediction supplied outside the resonance hypothesis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5827 in / 1566 out tokens · 26551 ms · 2026-06-25T23:11:56.897602+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 27 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Inclusive and differential measurements of the t¯tγcross section and the t¯tγ/t¯t cross section ratio in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, (2025), arXiv:2511.01995 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    Weinberg, A Model of Leptons, Phys

    S. Weinberg, A Model of Leptons, Phys. Rev. Lett.19, 1264 (1967)

    1967

  3. [3]

    Takahashiet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Par- ticle Physics, Int

    F. Takahashiet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Par- ticle Physics, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A41, 2630011 (2026)

    2026

  4. [4]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of a new particle in the search for the Standard Model Higgs boson with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716, 1 (2012), arXiv:1207.7214 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  5. [5]

    Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Observation of a New Bo- son at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys

    S. Chatrchyanet al.(CMS), Observation of a New Bo- son at a Mass of 125 GeV with the CMS Experiment at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B716, 30 (2012), arXiv:1207.7235 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  6. [6]

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), A portrait of the Higgs boson by the CMS experiment ten years after the discovery., Nature607, 60 (2022), [Erratum: Nature 623, (2023)], arXiv:2207.00043 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), A detailed map of Higgs boson interactions by the ATLAS experiment ten years after the discovery, Nature607, 52 (2022), [Erratum: Nature 612, E24 (2022)], arXiv:2207.00092 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2022

  8. [8]

    Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results

    N. Aghanimet al.(Planck), Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters, Astron. Astrophys.641, A6 (2020), [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Abubakaret al.(T2K, NOvA), Joint neutrino oscil- lation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments, Nature646, 818 (2025), arXiv:2510.19888 [hep-ex]

    S. Abubakaret al.(T2K, NOvA), Joint neutrino oscil- lation analysis from the T2K and NOvA experiments, Nature646, 818 (2025), arXiv:2510.19888 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    A. D. Sakharov, Violation of CP Invariance, C asymme- try, and baryon asymmetry of the universe, Pisma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz.5, 32 (1967)

    1967

  11. [11]

    Arcadi, A

    G. Arcadi, A. Djouadi, and M. Raidal, Dark Matter through the Higgs portal, Phys. Rept.842, 1 (2020), arXiv:1903.03616 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  12. [12]

    von Buddenbrock, A

    S. von Buddenbrock, A. S. Cornell, A. Fadol, M. Kumar, B. Mellado, and X. Ruan, Multi-lepton signatures of ad- ditional scalar bosons beyond the Standard Model at the LHC, J. Phys. G45, 115003 (2018), arXiv:1711.07874 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  13. [13]

    Buddenbrock, A

    S. Buddenbrock, A. S. Cornell, Y. Fang, A. Fadol Mo- hammed, M. Kumar, B. Mellado, and K. G. Tomiwa, The emergence of multi-lepton anomalies at the LHC and their compatibility with new physics at the EW scale, JHEP10, 157, arXiv:1901.05300 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 1901

  14. [14]

    Hernandez, M

    Y. Hernandez, M. Kumar, A. S. Cornell, S.-E. Dahbi, Y. Fang, B. Lieberman, B. Mellado, K. Monnakgotla, X. Ruan, and S. Xin, The anomalous production of multi- lepton and its impact on the measurement ofW hpro- duction at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C81, 365 (2021), arXiv:1912.00699 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  15. [15]

    von Buddenbrock, R

    S. von Buddenbrock, R. Ruiz, and B. Mellado, Anatomy of inclusivet ¯tWproduction at hadron colliders, Phys. Lett. B811, 135964 (2020), arXiv:2009.00032 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  16. [16]

    Fischeret al., Unveiling hidden physics at the LHC, Eur

    O. Fischeret al., Unveiling hidden physics at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C82, 665 (2022), arXiv:2109.06065 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2022

  17. [17]

    Crivellin and B

    A. Crivellin and B. Mellado, Anomalies in particle physics and their implications for physics beyond the standard model, Nature Rev. Phys.6, 294 (2024), arXiv:2309.03870 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    von Buddenbrock, N

    S. von Buddenbrock, N. Chakrabarty, A. S. Cor- nell, D. Kar, M. Kumar, T. Mandal, B. Mellado, B. Mukhopadhyaya, R. G. Reed, and X. Ruan, Phe- nomenological signatures of additional scalar bosons at the LHC, Eur. Phys. J. C76, 580 (2016), arXiv:1606.01674 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  19. [19]

    Crivellin, Y

    A. Crivellin, Y. Fang, O. Fischer, S. Bhattacharya, M. Kumar, E. Malwa, B. Mellado, N. Rapheeha, X. Ruan, and Q. Sha, Accumulating evidence for the as- sociated production of a new Higgs boson at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D108, 115031 (2023), arXiv:2109.02650 [hep- ph]

    arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Coloretti, A

    G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, S. Bhattacharya, and B. Mellado, Searching for low-mass resonances decay- ing into W bosons, Phys. Rev. D108, 035026 (2023), arXiv:2302.07276 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Bhattacharya, B

    S. Bhattacharya, B. Lieberman, M. Kumar, A. Criv- ellin, Y. Fang, R. Mazini, and B. Mellado, Emerg- ing Excess Consistent with a Narrow Resonance at 152 GeV in High-Energy Proton-Proton Collisions, (2025), arXiv:2503.16245 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Search for dark matter in events with missing transverse momentum and a Higgs bo- son decaying into two photons in pp collisions at √s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP10, 013, arXiv:2104.13240 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Model-independent search for the presence of new physics in events includingH→γγwith√s= 13 TeV pp data recorded by the ATLAS detector 6 at the LHC, JHEP07, 176, arXiv:2301.10486 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  24. [24]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurements of Higgs boson production by gluon-gluon fusion and vector-boson fusion usingH→W W ∗ →eνµνdecays inppcollisions at√s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 108, 032005 (2023), arXiv:2207.00338 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  25. [25]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Search for the decay of a Higgs boson in theℓℓγchannel in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP11, 152, arXiv:1806.05996 [hep- ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  26. [26]

    Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search for Higgs boson decays to a Z boson and a photon in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV, JHEP05, 233, arXiv:2204.12945 [hep-ex]

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Search for Higgs boson decays to a Z boson and a photon in proton-proton collisions at√s= 13 TeV, JHEP05, 233, arXiv:2204.12945 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  27. [27]

    Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Measurements of the Higgs boson production cross section and couplings in the W boson pair decay channel in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Eur

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Measurements of the Higgs boson production cross section and couplings in the W boson pair decay channel in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, Eur. Phys. J. C83, 667 (2023), arXiv:2206.09466 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Fileviez Perez, H

    P. Fileviez Perez, H. H. Patel, M. J. Ramsey-Musolf, and K. Wang, Triplet Scalars and Dark Matter at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D79, 055024 (2009), arXiv:0811.3957 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  29. [29]

    Coloretti, A

    G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, and B. Mellado, Combined explanation of LHC multilepton, diphoton, and top- quark excesses, Phys. Rev. D110, 073001 (2024), arXiv:2312.17314 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  30. [30]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of top-quark pair production in association with a photon and measure- ment of thet ¯tγproduction cross section in pp collisions at √s= 7 TeV using the ATLAS detector, Phys. Rev. D 91, 072007 (2015), arXiv:1502.00586 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  31. [31]

    Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of thet tγ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at√s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11, 086, arXiv:1706.03046 [hep-ex]

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of thet tγ production cross section in proton-proton collisions at√s= 8 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP11, 086, arXiv:1706.03046 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  32. [32]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of the semileptonic tt +γproduction cross section in pp colli- sions at √s= 8 TeV, JHEP10, 006, arXiv:1706.08128 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  33. [33]

    A. Tumasyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of the inclu- sive and differential ttγcross sections in the single-lepton channel and EFT interpretation at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP 12, 180, arXiv:2107.01508 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections oft ¯tγproduction in leptonic final states at √s= 13 TeV in ATLAS, Eur

    M. Aaboudet al.(ATLAS), Measurements of inclusive and differential fiducial cross-sections oft ¯tγproduction in leptonic final states at √s= 13 TeV in ATLAS, Eur. Phys. J. C79, 382 (2019), arXiv:1812.01697 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  35. [35]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurements of inclusive and differential cross-sections oft tγproduction in pp colli- sions at √s= 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector, JHEP 10, 191, arXiv:2403.09452 [hep-ex]

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the charge asym- metry in top-quark pair production in association with a photon with the ATLAS experiment, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of the charge asym- metry in top-quark pair production in association with a photon with the ATLAS experiment, Phys. Lett. B843, 137848 (2023), arXiv:2212.10552 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2023

  37. [37]

    Alwall, M

    J. Alwall, M. Herquet, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, and T. Stelzer, MadGraph 5 : Going Beyond, JHEP06, 128, arXiv:1106.0522 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  38. [38]

    Sj¨ ostrand, S

    T. Sj¨ ostrand, S. Ask, J. R. Christiansen, R. Corke, N. De- sai, P. Ilten, S. Mrenna, S. Prestel, C. O. Rasmussen, and P. Z. Skands, An introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun.191, 159 (2015), arXiv:1410.3012 [hep- ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  39. [39]

    de Favereau, C

    J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆ ıtre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi (DELPHES 3), DELPHES 3, A modular framework for fast simu- lation of a generic collider experiment, JHEP02, 057, arXiv:1307.6346 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  40. [40]

    Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of a pseudoscalar excess at the top quark pair produc- tion threshold, Rept

    A. Hayrapetyanet al.(CMS), Observation of a pseudoscalar excess at the top quark pair produc- tion threshold, Rept. Prog. Phys.88, 087801 (2025), arXiv:2503.22382 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of a cross-section enhancement near thet ¯tproduction threshold in √s= 13 TeVppcollisions with the ATLAS detector, (2026), arXiv:2601.11780 [hep-ex]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Observation of a cross-section enhancement near thet ¯tproduction threshold in √s= 13 TeVppcollisions with the ATLAS detector, (2026), arXiv:2601.11780 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  42. [42]

    Nason, E

    P. Nason, E. Re, and L. Rottoli, Spin correlations int t production and decay at the LHC in QCD perturbation theory, JHEP10, 149, arXiv:2505.00096 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Flacke, B

    T. Flacke, B. Fuks, D. Kim, J. Kim, S. J. Lee, and L. Munoz-Aillaud, New physics in toponium’s shadow?, (2025), arXiv:2512.03220 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  44. [44]

    A. M. Sirunyanet al.(CMS), Measurement of the pro- duction cross section for single top quarks in association with W bosons in proton-proton collisions at √s= 13 TeV, JHEP10, 117, arXiv:1805.07399 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Banik, G

    S. Banik, G. Coloretti, A. Crivellin, and B. Mellado, Un- covering new Higgses in the LHC analyses of differential ttcross sections, JHEP01, 155, arXiv:2308.07953 [hep- ph]

    arXiv

  46. [46]

    B. A. Kniehl, Radiative corrections forH→W +W − (γ) in the standard model, Nucl. Phys. B357, 439 (1991)

    1991

  47. [47]

    Bredenstein, A

    A. Bredenstein, A. Denner, S. Dittmaier, and M. M. We- ber, Precise predictions for the Higgs-boson decay H —> WW/ZZ —>4 leptons, Phys. Rev. D74, 013004 (2006), arXiv:hep-ph/0604011

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  48. [48]

    Dawson and P

    S. Dawson and P. P. Giardino, Electroweak corrections to Higgs boson decays toγγandW +W − in standard model EFT, Phys. Rev. D98, 095005 (2018), arXiv:1807.11504 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  49. [49]

    F. Egle, M. M¨ uhlleitner, R. Santos, and J. Viana, Elec- troweak corrections to Higgs boson decays in a Complex Singlet extension of the SM and their phenomenological impact, JHEP11, 116, arXiv:2306.04127 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  50. [50]

    Degrande, K

    C. Degrande, K. Hartling, and H. E. Logan, Scalar decays toγγ,Zγ, andW γin the Georgi-Machacek model, Phys. Rev. D96, 075013 (2017), [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 98, 019901 (2018)], arXiv:1708.08753 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  51. [51]

    Bevilacqua, H

    G. Bevilacqua, H. B. Hartanto, M. Kraus, T. Weber, and M. Worek, Hard Photons in Hadroproduction of Top Quarks with Realistic Final States, JHEP10, 158, arXiv:1803.09916 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  52. [52]

    Bevilacqua, H

    G. Bevilacqua, H. B. Hartanto, M. Kraus, T. Weber, and M. Worek, Off-shell vs on-shell modelling of top quarks in photon associated production, JHEP03, 154, arXiv:1912.09999 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 1912

  53. [53]

    Ria and D

    G. Ria and D. Meloni, Radiative corrections of heavy scalar decays to gauge bosons in the singlet extension of the Standard Model, Eur. Phys. J. C78, 270 (2018), arXiv:1705.11126 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2018

  54. [54]

    T. C. Yuan, Anomalous radiative decay of heavy Higgs boson, (1992), arXiv:hep-ph/9205239

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1992

  55. [55]

    T. G. Rizzo, Radiative decay of heavy higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D31, 2366 (1985)

    1985

  56. [56]

    R. L. Workmanet al.(Particle Data Group), Review of Particle Physics, PTEP2022, 083C01 (2022)

    2022

  57. [57]

    P. W. Higgs, Broken Symmetries and the Masses of Gauge Bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 508 (1964). 7

    1964

  58. [58]

    Englert and R

    F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett.13, 321 (1964)

    1964

  59. [59]

    Trevisani (CMS), Higgs measurements from CMS, PoSDISCRETE2022, 056 (2024)

    N. Trevisani (CMS), Higgs measurements from CMS, PoSDISCRETE2022, 056 (2024)

    2024

  60. [60]

    Aadet al.(ATLAS), Characterising the Higgs bo- son with ATLAS data from the LHC Run-2, Phys

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Characterising the Higgs bo- son with ATLAS data from the LHC Run-2, Phys. Rept. 1116, 4 (2025), arXiv:2404.05498 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2025

  61. [61]

    Brivio and M

    I. Brivio and M. Trott, The Standard Model as an Effective Field Theory, Phys. Rept.793, 1 (2019), arXiv:1706.08945 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  62. [62]

    Roszkowski, E

    L. Roszkowski, E. M. Sessolo, and S. Trojanowski, WIMP dark matter candidates and searches—current status and future prospects, Rept. Prog. Phys.81, 066201 (2018), arXiv:1707.06277 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  63. [63]

    Giganti, S

    C. Giganti, S. Lavignac, and M. Zito, Neutrino oscilla- tions: The rise of the PMNS paradigm, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.98, 1 (2018), arXiv:1710.00715 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  64. [64]

    Garbrecht, Why is there more matter than anti- matter? Calculational methods for leptogenesis and electroweak baryogenesis, Prog

    B. Garbrecht, Why is there more matter than anti- matter? Calculational methods for leptogenesis and electroweak baryogenesis, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.110, 103727 (2020), arXiv:1812.02651 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  65. [65]

    Bodeker and W

    D. Bodeker and W. Buchmuller, Baryogenesis from the weak scale to the grand unification scale, Rev. Mod. Phys.93, 035004 (2021), arXiv:2009.07294 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  66. [66]

    G. Aadet al.(ATLAS), Measurement of light-by- light scattering and search for axion-like particles with 2.2 nb −1 of Pb+Pb data with the ATLAS detector, JHEP03, 243, [Erratum: JHEP 11, 050 (2021)], arXiv:2008.05355 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2021

  67. [67]

    A combination of measurements of Higgs boson produc- tion and decay using up to 139 fb −1 of proton–proton collision data at √s= 13 TeV collected with the ATLAS experiment, (2020)

    2020

  68. [68]

    Alwall, R

    J. Alwall, R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, F. Maltoni, O. Mattelaer, H. S. Shao, T. Stelzer, P. Torrielli, and M. Zaro, The automated computation of tree-level and next-to-leading order differential cross sections, and their matching to parton shower simulations, JHEP07, 079, arXiv:1405.0301 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  69. [69]

    Frederix, S

    R. Frederix, S. Frixione, V. Hirschi, D. Pagani, H. S. Shao, and M. Zaro, The automation of next-to-leading order electroweak calculations, JHEP07, 185, [Erratum: JHEP 11, 085 (2021)], arXiv:1804.10017 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021

  70. [70]

    B. Fuks, K. Hagiwara, K. Ma, and Y.-J. Zheng, Signa- tures of toponium formation in LHC run 2 data, Phys. Rev. D104, 034023 (2021), arXiv:2102.11281 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2021