pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25050 · v1 · pith:L2BQO44Cnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-ph

Probing Scalar Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions using High-Energy Astrophysical Neutrinos

Ankur Verma , Carlos A. Arg\"uelles , P. S. Bhupal Dev , Bhaskar Dutta , Ivan Martinez-Soler This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords scalar non-standard interactionsneutrino oscillationsastrophysical neutrinosIceCubepseudo-Dirac neutrinosactive-sterile splittingYukawa couplings
0
0 comments X

The pith

Scalar non-standard neutrino interactions produce small active-sterile mass splittings that change the flavor and energy distribution of high-energy astrophysical neutrinos.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that scalar non-standard interactions modify the neutrino mass matrix and create tiny active-sterile mass splittings through matter effects from the relic neutrino background in a Majorana-type setup. This produces pseudo-Dirac neutrino behavior whose effects appear in the flavor composition and spectral shape of astrophysical neutrinos. Flavor ratio measurements and spectral analyses of IceCube track, cascade, and point-source data are then used to exclude regions of Yukawa coupling and scalar mass parameter space. The same methods applied to projected IceCube-Gen2 sensitivity extend the reach to ultra-light mediators.

Core claim

Scalar non-standard interaction of neutrinos contributes as modifications to the neutrino mass matrix in the oscillation Hamiltonian and can induce a small active-sterile mass splitting due to the matter effect induced by the relic neutrino background via a Majorana-type interaction. This framework leads to pseudo-Dirac behavior of neutrinos, introducing rich phenomenology in neutrino oscillations, particularly for high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. These hyperfine active-sterile splittings imprint themselves in two complementary ways on high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux, namely, in modifying the flavor composition and energy distribution. Flavor and spectral analyses of IceCube data

What carries the argument

The small active-sterile mass splitting induced by scalar non-standard interactions through the matter effect of the relic neutrino background.

If this is right

  • Deviations in flavor ratios from the standard 1:1:1 expectation at Earth can be used to bound the SNSI parameters with current IceCube data.
  • Spectral distortions in both diffuse-flux track and cascade samples plus point-source spectra supply independent constraints on the same parameters.
  • The combined flavor-plus-spectral analysis produces stronger exclusions than either method alone.
  • Projected IceCube-Gen2 statistics will tighten the bounds on ultra-light scalar mediators by roughly an order of magnitude.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same relic-background-induced splitting mechanism could be searched for in other high-statistics neutrino telescopes or in multi-messenger coincidence studies.
  • If the relic neutrino density deviates from the standard cosmological value, the size of the induced splitting would scale accordingly and alter the excluded regions.
  • The pseudo-Dirac propagation effect over cosmic baselines may connect to other long-baseline neutrino observables not yet examined in this framework.

Load-bearing premise

The relic neutrino background induces a matter effect via a Majorana-type scalar non-standard interaction that produces a small active-sterile mass splitting.

What would settle it

A set of high-energy astrophysical neutrino events whose measured flavor ratios and energy spectra match standard three-flavor expectations without the deviations predicted for given values of Yukawa coupling and scalar mass would exclude those SNSI parameter values.

read the original abstract

Scalar non-standard interaction (SNSI) of neutrinos contributes as modifications to the neutrino mass matrix in the oscillation Hamiltonian and can induce a small active-sterile mass splitting due to the matter effect induced by the relic neutrino background via a Majorana-type interaction. This framework leads to pseudo-Dirac behavior of neutrinos, introducing rich phenomenology in neutrino oscillations, particularly for high-energy astrophysical neutrinos. We show that these hyperfine active-sterile splittings imprint themselves in two complementary ways on high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux, namely, in modifying the flavor composition and energy distribution. In this work, we perform both flavor and spectral analyses of the high-energy astrophysical neutrino flux to probe SNSI. We confront the predicted flavor ratios with current IceCube measurements and with the projected reach of next-generation detectors such as IceCube-Gen2. For the spectral analysis, we use the diffuse-flux ESTES (tracks) and cascade data sets, together with point-source spectral shape analysis based on a recent catalog of neutrino-bright sources. The regions excluded by the combined flavor and spectral analyses are translated into limits on the underlying SNSI parameters, namely, Yukawa couplings and scalar mass, providing new sensitivities on the SNSI parameter space for ultra-light mediators.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that scalar non-standard neutrino interactions (SNSI) with a Majorana-type coupling to the relic neutrino background induce a small active-sterile mass splitting, producing pseudo-Dirac neutrino behavior. This imprints on high-energy astrophysical neutrino fluxes by altering flavor composition and energy spectra. The authors perform flavor-ratio analyses against current IceCube data and IceCube-Gen2 projections, plus spectral analyses using the ESTES track and cascade diffuse-flux datasets together with point-source spectral shapes from a neutrino-bright source catalog, and translate the resulting exclusions into limits on Yukawa couplings and scalar mass for ultra-light mediators.

Significance. If the induced splitting is dynamically relevant at PeV energies, the work offers a novel probe of ultra-light scalar mediators via astrophysical neutrinos, using complementary flavor and spectral information from IceCube. The combination of multiple datasets and future projections is a strength; the translation of exclusions into SNSI parameter limits could provide useful complementary constraints.

major comments (1)
  1. [SNSI framework / effective potential derivation] The abstract states that the relic neutrino background induces a matter effect via Majorana-type SNSI that produces the hyperfine active-sterile splitting responsible for the pseudo-Dirac phenomenology. Given n_ν ≈ 56 cm^{-3}, the effective potential V ∼ g² n_ν / m_φ² is extremely small; the manuscript must show explicitly (in the section deriving the effective Hamiltonian or mass splitting) that, for the Yukawa couplings and scalar masses under consideration, the resulting Δm² satisfies Δm² L / (2E) ∼ O(1) at E ∼ PeV and L ∼ Gpc. Without this verification the predicted modifications to flavor ratios and spectra vanish and the IceCube limits cannot be translated into SNSI constraints. This is load-bearing for the central claim.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract introduces 'hyperfine active-sterile splittings' without a brief definition or scale; adding one sentence would improve accessibility.
  2. [Spectral analysis] The spectral analysis section should state the precise energy ranges, event selections, and background treatments for the ESTES and cascade datasets to allow independent reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough review and for identifying a key point that strengthens the central claim of the manuscript. We address the major comment below and will incorporate the requested verification in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The abstract states that the relic neutrino background induces a matter effect via Majorana-type SNSI that produces the hyperfine active-sterile splitting responsible for the pseudo-Dirac phenomenology. Given n_ν ≈ 56 cm^{-3}, the effective potential V ∼ g² n_ν / m_φ² is extremely small; the manuscript must show explicitly (in the section deriving the effective Hamiltonian or mass splitting) that, for the Yukawa couplings and scalar masses under consideration, the resulting Δm² satisfies Δm² L / (2E) ∼ O(1) at E ∼ PeV and L ∼ Gpc. Without this verification the predicted modifications to flavor ratios and spectra vanish and the IceCube limits cannot be translated into SNSI constraints. This is load-bearing for the central claim.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of the oscillation phase reaching O(1) is essential and load-bearing. In the revised manuscript we will insert a new subsection (immediately following the derivation of the effective Hamiltonian) that computes V = g² n_ν / m_φ² for the Majorana-type SNSI, obtains Δm² = 2 E V, and evaluates the phase Δm² L / (2E) at E = 1 PeV and L = 1 Gpc for the benchmark values of g and m_φ that lie inside the regions excluded by our flavor and spectral analyses. We will tabulate or plot the resulting phases to confirm they are O(1) precisely in the ultra-light mediator regime under consideration, thereby establishing that the pseudo-Dirac effects are dynamically relevant and that the IceCube limits can be translated into SNSI parameter constraints. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; model predictions confronted with external data

full rationale

The paper defines SNSI modifications to the mass matrix, derives the induced active-sterile splitting from the relic neutrino background via Majorana interaction, predicts resulting changes to flavor ratios and spectra, and compares those predictions to IceCube public data sets (ESTES tracks, cascades, point-source catalog). No equations reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, no load-bearing self-citations appear, and the derivation chain remains independent of the target IceCube measurements. This is the normal case of a self-contained theoretical framework tested against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence and properties of the relic neutrino background together with the assumption of a Majorana-type scalar interaction; these are standard in the subfield but not independently verified here.

free parameters (2)
  • Yukawa couplings
    Strength parameters of the scalar non-standard interaction that are constrained by the data.
  • Scalar mass
    Mass of the ultra-light mediator whose value affects the size of the induced splitting.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Relic neutrino background produces a matter effect through Majorana-type SNSI leading to active-sterile mass splitting
    Invoked in the abstract as the mechanism that generates the pseudo-Dirac behavior used for the phenomenology.
invented entities (1)
  • Scalar mediator no independent evidence
    purpose: Mediates the non-standard neutrino interaction
    Postulated new particle whose coupling and mass are the target of the limits; no independent evidence provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5771 in / 1356 out tokens · 29430 ms · 2026-06-25T22:52:21.658693+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

228 extracted references · 67 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys

    L. Wolfenstein,Neutrino Oscillations in Matter,Phys. Rev. D17(1978) 2369

    1978

  2. [2]

    Farzan and M

    Y. Farzan and M. Tortola,Neutrino oscillations and Non-Standard Interactions,Front. in Phys.6 (2018) 10 [1710.09360]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  3. [3]

    Dev et al.,Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report,SciPost

    P.S.B. Dev et al.,Neutrino Non-Standard Interactions: A Status Report,SciPost. Phys. Proc.2 (2019) 001 [1907.00991]. [4]MINOScollaboration,Search for flavor-changing nonstandard neutrino interactions usingν e appearance in MINOS,Phys. Rev. D95(2017) 012005 [1605.06169]. [5]Super-Kamiokandecollaboration,Atmospheric neutrino oscillation analysis with extern...

    arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Babu, P.S.B

    K.S. Babu, P.S.B. Dev, S. Jana and A. Thapa,Non-Standard Interactions in Radiative Neutrino Mass Models,JHEP03(2020) 006 [1907.09498]

    arXiv 2020

  5. [5]

    Coloma, I

    P. Coloma, I. Esteban, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and M. Maltoni,Improved global fit to Non-Standard neutrino Interactions using COHERENT energy and timing data,JHEP02(2020) 023 [1911.09109]

    arXiv 2020

  6. [6]

    Dutta, R.F

    B. Dutta, R.F. Lang, S. Liao, S. Sinha, L. Strigari and A. Thompson,A global analysis strategy to resolve neutrino NSI degeneracies with scattering and oscillation data,JHEP09(2020) 106 [2002.03066]

    arXiv 2020

  7. [7]

    Coloma, M.C

    P. Coloma, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni, J.P. Pinheiro and S. Urrea,Global constraints on non-standard neutrino interactions with quarks and electrons,JHEP08(2023) 032 [2305.07698]

    arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Coloma, E

    P. Coloma, E. Fernández-Martínez, J. López-Pavón, X. Marcano, D. Naredo-Tuero and S. Urrea, Improving the global SMEFT picture with bounds on neutrino NSI,JHEP02(2025) 137 [2411.00090]

    arXiv 2025

  9. [9]

    Gehrlein, P.A.N

    J. Gehrlein, P.A.N. Machado and J.P. Pinheiro,Constraining non-standard neutrino interactions with neutral current events at long-baseline oscillation experiments,JHEP05(2025) 065 [2412.08712]

    arXiv 2025

  10. [10]

    Chatterjee and A

    S.S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo,Nonstandard Neutrino Interactions as a Solution to theN OνAand T2K Discrepancy,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 051802 [2008.04161]

    arXiv 2021

  11. [11]

    Denton, J

    P.B. Denton, J. Gehrlein and R. Pestes,CP-Violating Neutrino Nonstandard Interactions in Long-Baseline-Accelerator Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.126(2021) 051801 [2008.01110]

    arXiv 2021

  12. [12]

    Cherchiglia, P

    A. Cherchiglia, P. Pasquini, O.L.G. Peres, F.F. Rodrigues, R.R. Rossi and E.S. Souza,Alleviating the present tension between T2K and NOνA with nonstandard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D 112(2025) 093004 [2310.18401]

    arXiv 2025

  13. [13]

    Chatterjee and A

    S.S. Chatterjee and A. Palazzo,Status of tension between NOvA and T2K after Neutrino 2024 and possible role of nonstandard neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D110(2024) 113002 [2409.10599]

    arXiv 2024

  14. [14]

    Grossman,Nonstandard neutrino interactions and neutrino oscillation experiments,Phys

    Y. Grossman,Nonstandard neutrino interactions and neutrino oscillation experiments,Phys. Lett. B359(1995) 141 [hep-ph/9507344]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1995

  15. [15]

    Bergmann, Y

    S. Bergmann, Y. Grossman and E. Nardi,Neutrino propagation in matter with general interactions, Phys. Rev. D60(1999) 093008 [hep-ph/9903517]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  16. [16]

    Ge and S.J

    S.-F. Ge and S.J. Parke,Scalar Nonstandard Interactions in Neutrino Oscillation,Phys. Rev. Lett. 122(2019) 211801 [1812.08376]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    K.S. Babu, G. Chauhan and P.S.B. Dev,Neutrino nonstandard interactions via light scalars in the Earth, Sun, supernovae, and the early Universe,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 095029 [1912.13488]

    arXiv 2020

  18. [18]

    A.N. Khan, W. Rodejohann and X.-J. Xu,Borexino and general neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 055047 [1906.12102]

    arXiv 2020

  19. [19]

    Smirnov and X.-J

    A.Y. Smirnov and X.-J. Xu,Wolfenstein potentials for neutrinos induced by ultra-light mediators, JHEP12(2019) 046 [1909.07505]. – 24 –

    arXiv 2019

  20. [20]

    Venzor, A

    J. Venzor, A. Pérez-Lorenzana and J. De-Santiago,Bounds on neutrino-scalar nonstandard interactions from big bang nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 043534 [2009.08104]

    arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Escrihuela, L.J

    F.J. Escrihuela, L.J. Flores, O.G. Miranda and J. Rendón,Global constraints on neutral-current generalized neutrino interactions,JHEP07(2021) 061 [2105.06484]

    arXiv 2021

  22. [22]

    Chaves, P.C

    M.E. Chaves, P.C. de Holanda and O.L.G. Peres,Testing non-standard neutrino interactions in (anti)-electron neutrino disappearance experiments,JHEP03(2023) 180 [2106.15725]

    arXiv 2023

  23. [23]

    Medhi, D

    A. Medhi, D. Dutta and M.M. Devi,Exploring the effects of scalar non standard interactions on the CP violation sensitivity at DUNE,JHEP06(2022) 129 [2111.12943]

    arXiv 2022

  24. [24]

    Schwemberger and T.-T

    T. Schwemberger and T.-T. Yu,Detecting beyond the standard model interactions of solar neutrinos in low-threshold dark matter detectors,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 015002 [2202.01254]

    arXiv 2022

  25. [25]

    Medhi, M.M

    A. Medhi, M.M. Devi and D. Dutta,Imprints of scalar NSI on the CP-violation sensitivity using synergy among DUNE, T2HK and T2HKK,JHEP01(2023) 079 [2209.05287]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Dutta, S

    B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma,Non-standard neutrino interactions in light mediator models at reactor experiments,JHEP03(2023) 163 [2209.13566]

    arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Denton, A

    P.B. Denton, A. Giarnetti and D. Meloni,How to identify different new neutrino oscillation physics scenarios at DUNE,JHEP02(2023) 210 [2210.00109]

    arXiv 2023

  28. [28]

    Gupta, D

    A. Gupta, D. Majumdar and S. Prakash,Neutrino oscillation measurements with KamLAND and JUNO in the presence of scalar NSI,Phys. Dark Univ.49(2025) 102011 [2306.07343]

    arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Medhi, A

    A. Medhi, A. Sarker and M.M. Devi,Scalar NSI: a unique tool for constraining absolute neutrino masses via neutrino oscillations,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 380 [2307.05348]

    arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Schwemberger, V

    T. Schwemberger, V. Takhistov and T.-T. Yu,Hunting nonstandard neutrino interactions and leptoquarks in dark matter experiments,JCAP11(2024) 068 [2307.15736]

    arXiv 2024

  31. [31]

    Singha, R

    D.K. Singha, R. Majhi, L. Panda, M. Ghosh and R. Mohanta,Study of scalar nonstandard interaction at the Protvino to super-ORCA experiment,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 095038 [2308.10789]

    arXiv 2024

  32. [32]

    Sarker, A

    A. Sarker, A. Medhi, D. Bezboruah, M.M. Devi and D. Dutta,Impact of scalar NSI on the neutrino mass ordering sensitivity at DUNE, HK and KNO,JHEP06(2024) 128 [2309.12249]. [43]ESSnuSBcollaboration,Study of nonstandard interactions mediated by a scalar field at the ESSnuSB experiment,Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 115010 [2310.10749]

    arXiv 2024

  33. [33]

    Dutta, S

    B. Dutta, S. Ghosh, K.J. Kelly, T. Li, A. Thompson and A. Verma,Non-standard neutrino interactions mediated by a light scalar at DUNE,JHEP07(2024) 213 [2401.02107]

    arXiv 2024

  34. [34]

    Sarker, D

    A. Sarker, D. Bezboruah, A. Medhi and M.M. Devi,Sensitivity of DUNE in the presence of off-diagonal scalar NSI parameters,Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 035042 [2406.15307]

    arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    Denton, A

    P.B. Denton, A. Giarnetti and D. Meloni,Solar neutrinos and the strongest oscillation constraints on scalar NSI,JHEP01(2025) 097 [2409.15411]

    arXiv 2025

  36. [36]

    Bezboruah, D.S

    D. Bezboruah, D.S. Chattopadhyay, A. Medhi, A. Sarker and M.M. Devi,Neutrino oscillations in presence of diagonal elements of scalar NSI: an analytic approach,JHEP12(2025) 222 [2410.05250]

    arXiv 2025

  37. [37]

    Pusty, R

    S.K. Pusty, R. Majhi, D.K. Singha, M. Ghosh and R. Mohanta,Impact of scalar NSI with off-diagonal parameters at DUNE and P2SO,Eur. Phys. J. C85(2025) 1294 [2410.23014]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    De Romeri, D.K

    V. De Romeri, D.K. Papoulias and C.A. Ternes,Bounds on new neutrino interactions from the first CEνNS data at direct detection experiments,JCAP05(2025) 012 [2411.11749]

    arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Yadav and A.K

    B. Yadav and A.K. Alok,Impact of scalar NSI on spatial and temporal correlations in neutrino oscillations,J. Phys. G52(2025) 125004 [2411.17503]. – 25 –

    arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Das and M.H

    S. Das and M.H. Reno,Probing scalar non-standard interaction of supernova neutrinos in next-generation neutrino experiments,JCAP02(2026) 076 [2508.16510]

    arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Dutta, A

    B. Dutta, A. Karthikeyan, N. Mishra, Y. Porto and L.E. Strigari,Scalar non-standard neutrino interactions in Galactic supernovae,2508.16558

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Choubey and A

    S. Choubey and A. Lund,Neutrino mass ordering in JUNO at risk from scalar NSI induced resonance,2602.05564

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Alves, H

    G.F.S. Alves, H. Nunokawa and R. Zukanovich Funchal,Impact of New Physics on the JUNO-Long-Baseline Synergy in Neutrino Mass Ordering Determination,2603.17181

    arXiv

  44. [44]

    Flores, R

    L.J. Flores, R. Pacheco-Aké, E. Peinado, G. Sanchez Garcia and E. Vázquez-Jáuregui,Constraints on light sterile neutrinos and scalar nonstandard interactions using the first reactor antineutrino oscillation results at JUNO,Phys. Rev. D113(2026) 115030 [2603.24677]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  45. [45]

    Bialynicka-Birula,Do Neutrinos Interact between Themselves?,Nuovo Cim.33(1964) 1484

    Z. Bialynicka-Birula,Do Neutrinos Interact between Themselves?,Nuovo Cim.33(1964) 1484

    1964

  46. [46]

    Bardin, S.M

    D.Y. Bardin, S.M. Bilenky and B. Pontecorvo,On the nu - nu interaction,Phys. Lett. B32(1970) 121

    1970

  47. [47]

    Berryman et al.,Neutrino self-interactions: A white paper,Phys

    J.M. Berryman et al.,Neutrino self-interactions: A white paper,Phys. Dark Univ.42(2023) 101267 [2203.01955]

    arXiv 2023

  48. [48]

    Chikashige, R.N

    Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei,Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number and Cosmological Constraints on the Neutrino Mass Spectrum,Phys. Rev. Lett.45(1980) 1926

    1980

  49. [49]

    Chikashige, R.N

    Y. Chikashige, R.N. Mohapatra and R.D. Peccei,Are There Real Goldstone Bosons Associated with Broken Lepton Number?,Phys. Lett. B98(1981) 265

    1981

  50. [50]

    Gelmini and M

    G.B. Gelmini and M. Roncadelli,Left-Handed Neutrino Mass Scale and Spontaneously Broken Lepton Number,Phys. Lett. B99(1981) 411

    1981

  51. [51]

    Schechter and J.W.F

    J. Schechter and J.W.F. Valle,Neutrino Decay and Spontaneous Violation of Lepton Number,Phys. Rev. D25(1982) 774

    1982

  52. [52]

    Barger, W.-Y

    V.D. Barger, W.-Y. Keung and S. Pakvasa,Majoron Emission by Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D25 (1982) 907

    1982

  53. [53]

    Kolb and M.S

    E.W. Kolb and M.S. Turner,Supernova 1987A and the Secret Interactions of Neutrinos,Phys. Rev. D36(1987) 2895

    1987

  54. [54]

    Bilenky, S.M

    M.S. Bilenky, S.M. Bilenky and A. Santamaria,Invisible width of the Z boson and ’secret’ neutrino-neutrino interactions,Phys. Lett. B301(1993) 287

    1993

  55. [55]

    Bilenky and A

    M.S. Bilenky and A. Santamaria,Bounding effective operators at the one loop level: The Case of four fermion neutrino interactions,Phys. Lett. B336(1994) 91 [hep-ph/9405427]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1994

  56. [56]

    Beacom and N.F

    J.F. Beacom and N.F. Bell,Do Solar Neutrinos Decay?,Phys. Rev. D65(2002) 113009 [hep-ph/0204111]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  57. [57]

    Farzan,Bounds on the coupling of the Majoron to light neutrinos from supernova cooling,Phys

    Y. Farzan,Bounds on the coupling of the Majoron to light neutrinos from supernova cooling,Phys. Rev. D67(2003) 073015 [hep-ph/0211375]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  58. [58]

    Beacom, N.F

    J.F. Beacom, N.F. Bell and S. Dodelson,Neutrinoless universe,Phys. Rev. Lett.93(2004) 121302 [astro-ph/0404585]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

  59. [59]

    Lessa and O.L.G

    A.P. Lessa and O.L.G. Peres,Revising limits on neutrino-Majoron couplings,Phys. Rev. D75 (2007) 094001 [hep-ph/0701068]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  60. [60]

    R. Laha, B. Dasgupta and J.F. Beacom,Constraints on New Neutrino Interactions via Light Abelian Vector Bosons,Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 093025 [1304.3460]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  61. [61]

    Cyr-Racine and K

    F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and K. Sigurdson,Limits on Neutrino-Neutrino Scattering in the Early Universe, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 123533 [1306.1536]. – 26 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  62. [62]

    Ioka and K

    K. Ioka and K. Murase,IceCube PeV–EeV neutrinos and secret interactions of neutrinos,PTEP 2014(2014) 061E01 [1404.2279]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  63. [63]

    Ng and J.F

    K.C.Y. Ng and J.F. Beacom,Cosmic neutrino cascades from secret neutrino interactions,Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 065035 [1404.2288]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  64. [64]

    Forastieri, M

    F. Forastieri, M. Lattanzi and P. Natoli,Constraints on secret neutrino interactions after Planck, JCAP07(2015) 014 [1504.04999]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  65. [65]

    Araki, F

    T. Araki, F. Kaneko, T. Ota, J. Sato and T. Shimomura,MeV scale leptonic force for cosmic neutrino spectrum and muon anomalous magnetic moment,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 013014 [1508.07471]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  66. [66]

    Pasquini and O.L.G

    P.S. Pasquini and O.L.G. Peres,Bounds on Neutrino-Scalar Yukawa Coupling,Phys. Rev. D93 (2016) 053007 [1511.01811]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  67. [67]

    Shoemaker and K

    I.M. Shoemaker and K. Murase,Probing BSM Neutrino Physics with Flavor and Spectral Distortions: Prospects for Future High-Energy Neutrino Telescopes,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 085004 [1512.07228]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  68. [68]

    Heurtier and Y

    L. Heurtier and Y. Zhang,Supernova Constraints on Massive (Pseudo)Scalar Coupling to Neutrinos,JCAP02(2017) 042 [1609.05882]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  69. [69]

    A. Das, A. Dighe and M. Sen,New effects of non-standard self-interactions of neutrinos in a supernova,JCAP05(2017) 051 [1705.00468]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  70. [70]

    Huang, T

    G.-y. Huang, T. Ohlsson and S. Zhou,Observational Constraints on Secret Neutrino Interactions from Big Bang Nucleosynthesis,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075009 [1712.04792]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  71. [71]

    Berryman, A

    J.M. Berryman, A. De Gouvêa, K.J. Kelly and Y. Zhang,Lepton-Number-Charged Scalars and Neutrino Beamstrahlung,Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 075030 [1802.00009]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  72. [72]

    K. Blum, Y. Nir and M. Shavit,Neutrinoless double-beta decay with massive scalar emission,Phys. Lett. B785(2018) 354 [1802.08019]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Brune and H

    T. Brune and H. Päs,Massive Majorons and constraints on the Majoron-neutrino coupling,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 096005 [1808.08158]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  74. [74]

    Kreisch, F.-Y

    C.D. Kreisch, F.-Y. Cyr-Racine and O. Doré,Neutrino puzzle: Anomalies, interactions, and cosmological tensions,Phys. Rev. D101(2020) 123505 [1902.00534]

    arXiv 2020

  75. [75]

    Barenboim, P.B

    G. Barenboim, P.B. Denton and I.M. Oldengott,Constraints on inflation with an extended neutrino sector,Phys. Rev. D99(2019) 083515 [1903.02036]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  76. [76]

    Murase and I.M

    K. Murase and I.M. Shoemaker,Neutrino Echoes from Multimessenger Transient Sources,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 241102 [1903.08607]

    arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Park, C.D

    M. Park, C.D. Kreisch, J. Dunkley, B. Hadzhiyska and F.-Y. Cyr-Racine,ΛCDM or self-interacting neutrinos: How CMB data can tell the two models apart,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 063524 [1904.02625]

    arXiv 2019

  78. [78]

    Forastieri, M

    F. Forastieri, M. Lattanzi and P. Natoli,Cosmological constraints on neutrino self-interactions with a light mediator,Phys. Rev. D100(2019) 103526 [1904.07810]

    arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Blinov, K.J

    N. Blinov, K.J. Kelly, G.Z. Krnjaic and S.D. McDermott,Constraining the Self-Interacting Neutrino Interpretation of the Hubble Tension,Phys. Rev. Lett.123(2019) 191102 [1905.02727]

    arXiv 2019

  80. [80]

    M. Lei, N. Steinberg and J.D. Wells,Probing Non-Standard Neutrino Interactions with Supernova Neutrinos at Hyper-K,JHEP01(2020) 179 [1907.01059]

    arXiv 2020

Showing first 80 references.