pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25130 · v1 · pith:RMW5NT6Hnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA· gr-qc

Finite Elements for Helmholtz Scattering with Infinity as a Computational Boundary

Markus Wess , An{\i}l Zengino\u{g}lu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 22:35 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NAgr-qc
keywords finite elementsHelmholtz equationhyperboloidal compactificationexterior scatteringfar-field patternperfectly matched layersnumerical benchmarksH1-conforming discretization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Hyperboloidal compactification maps infinity to a finite boundary for H1-conforming finite-element solution of the exterior Helmholtz equation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an H1-conforming finite-element formulation that treats infinity as a computational boundary for scattering problems governed by the exterior Helmholtz equation. A coordinate change maps spatial infinity to a finite outer surface while a rescaling removes the leading oscillatory decay at large distances. The resulting transformed equation has bounded coefficients and admits a global sesquilinear weak formulation that incorporates an explicit boundary mass term from the compactified surface. The trace of the solution on this surface directly supplies the far-field pattern after a known normalization. Benchmark comparisons with perfectly matched layer discretizations are reported for two- and three-dimensional test cases including a unit disk, a trapping geometry, a manufactured solution, and a submarine shape.

Core claim

We develop an H1-conforming finite-element formulation of hyperboloidal compactification for the exterior Helmholtz equation. A change of coordinates maps infinity to a finite outer boundary, and a rescaling removes the leading oscillatory decay. We derive the transformed equation and a global sesquilinear weak formulation with bounded coefficients. The compactified boundary contributes an explicit boundary mass term, and its trace gives the far-field pattern up to a known normalization.

What carries the argument

Hyperboloidal compactification via coordinate change and rescaling that produces bounded coefficients and a global weak form whose outer trace yields the far-field pattern.

Load-bearing premise

A coordinate change and rescaling exist that map infinity to a finite boundary while producing bounded coefficients and admitting a global sesquilinear weak formulation.

What would settle it

A numerical test on the unit-disk scattering problem in which the far-field pattern extracted from the compactified boundary deviates from the known analytic value by more than the expected discretization error.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25130 by An{\i}l Zengino\u{g}lu, Markus Wess.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Convergence of the hyperboloidal layer for the disk benchmark at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Real part, imaginary part and error of the numerical far field using hyperboloidal compactification [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Real part of the numerical scattered field in the computational domain, computed using hyper [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of hyperboloidal layers with PML methods. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Relative L 2 (Dint) error of the hyperboloidal and PML solution with σPML = 20 for polynomial order 6, mesh size 1/8, and varying wavenumber k. Dscat Dint Dext [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Geometry and mesh of the trapping square experiments. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Scattering coefficient for the trapping square problem obtained with hyperboloidal compactification [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Scattered fields for a non-resonant and a resonant wavenumber. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Total fields for a non-resonant and a resonant wavenumber. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Manufactured outgoing-wave benchmark exterior to an off-centered ball. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Convergence for the shifted-Green-function manufactured benchmark at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows the dependence of the relative L 2 (Dint) error on the wavenumber for fixed mesh size 0.2 and polynomial order 2. The left panel uses geometrically distributed wavenumbers from 10−5 to 102 , while the right panel samples the transition region linearly with k = 5, 5.5, . . . , 20. The PML uses the real damping strength σPML = 15. As in the 2D disk experiment, the compactified formulation gives smalle… view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Meshes of the submarine experiment. (a) The real part of the scattered field, including the far field. (b) The real part of the total field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Scattering of a plane wave (incoming from the top) on a submarine. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Building on the null-infinity-layer construction, we develop an H1-conforming finite-element formulation of hyperboloidal compactification for the exterior Helmholtz equation. A change of coordinates maps infinity to a finite outer boundary, and a rescaling removes the leading oscillatory decay. We derive the transformed equation and a global sesquilinear weak formulation with bounded coefficients. The compactified boundary contributes an explicit boundary mass term, and its trace gives the far-field pattern up to a known normalization. We compare the resulting method with finite-element discretizations using perfectly matched layers (PML) and report benchmark results in two and three dimensions. Numerical experiments include scattering by a unit disk, resonance in a trapping geometry, a manufactured benchmark in three dimensions, and a submarine benchmark.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops an H1-conforming finite-element formulation for the exterior Helmholtz equation via hyperboloidal compactification. A coordinate change maps spatial infinity to a finite outer boundary; a subsequent rescaling removes the leading oscillatory decay, producing a transformed equation asserted to have bounded coefficients. The authors derive a global sesquilinear weak form that incorporates an explicit boundary mass term on the compactified surface; the trace on this surface yields the far-field pattern up to a known normalization. Numerical comparisons with PML discretizations are presented for scattering by a unit disk, resonance in a trapping geometry, a manufactured 3D benchmark, and a submarine problem in two and three dimensions.

Significance. If the transformed operator indeed admits bounded coefficients and the weak formulation is well-posed in H1, the method supplies a practical alternative to PML truncation that directly furnishes the far-field pattern without post-processing. The reported benchmarks indicate competitive accuracy and the use of standard conforming elements is attractive for implementation. The explicit boundary mass term and normalization for far-field extraction constitute concrete, testable contributions.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (transformed equation): the claim that the rescaled coefficients remain bounded as the compactified radius approaches the outer boundary requires an explicit verification that the leading 1/r decay terms cancel after the coordinate change; without this step the global sesquilinear form may not be coercive on the stated space.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2 (unit-disk scattering): the reported L2 errors for the compactification method are given without mesh-size dependence or comparison to the expected convergence rate for the chosen polynomial degree; this weakens the claim that the method matches PML accuracy.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the rescaling factor ρ(r) is introduced without a displayed equation; a single-line definition would improve readability.
  2. [§5.3] The manufactured-solution test in three dimensions lacks a statement of the exact solution used; adding this would allow independent reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment and the specific comments on the transformed equation and the numerical results. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (transformed equation): the claim that the rescaled coefficients remain bounded as the compactified radius approaches the outer boundary requires an explicit verification that the leading 1/r decay terms cancel after the coordinate change; without this step the global sesquilinear form may not be coercive on the stated space.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of the cancellation is necessary for rigor. The manuscript states that the rescaled coefficients are bounded, but does not display the cancellation calculation. In the revised manuscript we will insert, in §3, the detailed expansion showing that the leading 1/r terms cancel identically after the coordinate change and rescaling, thereby confirming boundedness up to the outer boundary and supporting the claimed coercivity on H¹. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Table 2] Table 2 (unit-disk scattering): the reported L2 errors for the compactification method are given without mesh-size dependence or comparison to the expected convergence rate for the chosen polynomial degree; this weakens the claim that the method matches PML accuracy.

    Authors: We acknowledge that Table 2 presents L² errors without listing the underlying mesh sizes or comparing observed rates to the theoretical rate for the polynomial degree. In the revision we will augment the table (or its caption) with the mesh-size parameter h for each entry and add a short paragraph discussing the observed convergence rates relative to the expected rate, permitting a clearer comparison with the PML results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Minor self-citation; derivation remains independent

full rationale

The central steps—coordinate change mapping infinity to a finite boundary, rescaling to remove oscillatory decay, derivation of the transformed equation with bounded coefficients, and the resulting global sesquilinear form with explicit boundary mass term—are presented as direct consequences of the transformation. No fitted parameters are relabeled as predictions, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' prior work to force the formulation, and the far-field extraction follows from the trace operator after rescaling. The reference to the null-infinity-layer construction is acknowledged but does not carry the load of the new H1-conforming discretization or the numerical benchmarks against PML. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external verification.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility into parameters and axioms; the central transformation is presented as producing bounded coefficients without further detail.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The rescaled and compactified equation possesses bounded coefficients and admits a global sesquilinear weak formulation suitable for H1-conforming elements.
    Invoked as the outcome of the coordinate change and rescaling step in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5661 in / 1219 out tokens · 20860 ms · 2026-06-25T22:35:56.413232+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Hyperboloidal layers for hyperbolic equations on unbounded domains.Journal of Computational Physics, 230:2286–2302, 2011

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu. Hyperboloidal layers for hyperbolic equations on unbounded domains.Journal of Computational Physics, 230:2286–2302, 2011

    2011

  2. [2]

    A Null Infinity Layer for Wave Scattering.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 48(3):A1075–A1100, 2026

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu. A Null Infinity Layer for Wave Scattering.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 48(3):A1075–A1100, 2026

    2026

  3. [3]

    From Penrose to Melrose: Computing Scattering Amplitudes at Infinity for Unbounded Media.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04167, 2026

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu. From Penrose to Melrose: Computing Scattering Amplitudes at Infinity for Unbounded Media.arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.04167, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  4. [4]

    Eighty years of Sommerfeld’s radiation condition.Historia mathematica, 19(4):385–401, 1992

    Steven H Schot. Eighty years of Sommerfeld’s radiation condition.Historia mathematica, 19(4):385–401, 1992

    1992

  5. [5]

    Semyon V. Tsynkov. Numerical solution of problems on unbounded domains. A review.Applied Nu- merical Mathematics, 27(4):465 – 532, 1998. Special Issue on Absorbing Boundary Conditions

    1998

  6. [6]

    Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves.Acta Numer- ica, 8:47–106, 1999

    Thomas Hagstrom. Radiation boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves.Acta Numer- ica, 8:47–106, 1999

    1999

  7. [7]

    Steven G. Johnson. Notes on Perfectly Matched Layers (PMLs), 2021. Originally developed as MIT course notes

    2021

  8. [8]

    R. J. Astley. Infinite elements for wave problems: A review of current formulations and an assessment of accuracy.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 49(7):951–976, 2000

    2000

  9. [9]

    Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves.Mathematics of computation, 31(139):629–651, 1977

    Bjorn Engquist and Andrew Majda. Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves.Mathematics of computation, 31(139):629–651, 1977

    1977

  10. [10]

    Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations.Communications on Pure and applied Mathematics, 33(6):707–725, 1980

    Alvin Bayliss and Eli Turkel. Radiation boundary conditions for wave-like equations.Communications on Pure and applied Mathematics, 33(6):707–725, 1980

    1980

  11. [11]

    A formulation of asymptotic and exact boundary conditions using local operators.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 27(4):403–416, 1998

    Thomas Hagstrom and SI Hariharan. A formulation of asymptotic and exact boundary conditions using local operators.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 27(4):403–416, 1998

    1998

  12. [12]

    High-order nonreflecting boundary conditions without high-order derivatives.Journal of Computational Physics, 170(2):849–870, 2001

    Dan Givoli. High-order nonreflecting boundary conditions without high-order derivatives.Journal of Computational Physics, 170(2):849–870, 2001

    2001

  13. [13]

    Local absorbing boundary conditions on fixed domains give order-one errors for high-frequency waves.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 44(4):1946–2069, 2024

    Jeffrey Galkowski, David Lafontaine, and Euan A Spence. Local absorbing boundary conditions on fixed domains give order-one errors for high-frequency waves.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 44(4):1946–2069, 2024

    1946

  14. [14]

    A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves.Journal of Computational Physics, 114(2):185–200, 1994

    Jean-Pierre B´ erenger. A perfectly matched layer for the absorption of electromagnetic waves.Journal of Computational Physics, 114(2):185–200, 1994

    1994

  15. [15]

    Perfectly-matched-layer truncation is exponen- tially accurate at high frequency.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55(4):3344–3394, 2023

    Jeffrey Galkowski, David Lafontaine, and Euan Spence. Perfectly-matched-layer truncation is exponen- tially accurate at high frequency.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 55(4):3344–3394, 2023. 23

    2023

  16. [16]

    Non-reflecting boundary conditions.Journal of Computational Physics, 94(1):1–29, 1991

    Dan Givoli. Non-reflecting boundary conditions.Journal of Computational Physics, 94(1):1–29, 1991

    1991

  17. [17]

    Grote and Joseph B

    Marcus J. Grote and Joseph B. Keller. On nonreflecting boundary conditions.Journal of Computational Physics, 122(2):231–243, 1995

    1995

  18. [18]

    Alpert, Leslie Greengard, and Thomas Hagstrom

    Bradley K. Alpert, Leslie Greengard, and Thomas Hagstrom. Rapid evaluation of nonreflecting bound- ary kernels for time-domain wave propagation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 37(4):1138–1164, 2000

    2000

  19. [19]

    Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2013

    David Colton and Rainer Kress.Integral Equation Methods in Scattering Theory, volume 72 ofClassics in Applied Mathematics. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2013

    2013

  20. [20]

    Boundary integral equations in time-harmonic acoustic scattering.Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 15(3–5):229–243, 1991

    Rainer Kress. Boundary integral equations in time-harmonic acoustic scattering.Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 15(3–5):229–243, 1991

    1991

  21. [21]

    K. Gerdes. A summary of infinite element formulations for exterior Helmholtz problems.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 164(1–2):95–105, 1998

    1998

  22. [22]

    A few new (?) facts about infinite elements.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195(29–32):3572–3590, 2006

    Leszek Demkowicz and Jie Shen. A few new (?) facts about infinite elements.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 195(29–32):3572–3590, 2006

    2006

  23. [23]

    K. Gerdes. The conjugated vs. the unconjugated infinite element method for the Helmholtz equation in exterior domains.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 152:125–145, 1998

    1998

  24. [24]

    Hardy Space Infinite Elements for Scattering and Resonance Problems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 47(2):972–996, 2009

    Thorsten Hohage and Lothar Nannen. Hardy Space Infinite Elements for Scattering and Resonance Problems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 47(2):972–996, 2009

    2009

  25. [25]

    Convergence of Hardy Space Infinite Elements for Helmholtz Scattering and Resonance Problems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 54(3):1385–1400, 2016

    Martin Halla. Convergence of Hardy Space Infinite Elements for Helmholtz Scattering and Resonance Problems.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 54(3):1385–1400, 2016

    2016

  26. [26]

    Hardy space infinite elements for Helmholtz-type problems with unbounded inhomogeneities.Wave Motion, 48(2):116–129, 2011

    Lothar Nannen and Achim Sch¨ adle. Hardy space infinite elements for Helmholtz-type problems with unbounded inhomogeneities.Wave Motion, 48(2):116–129, 2011

    2011

  27. [27]

    Complex-scaled infinite elements for resonance problems in hetero- geneous open systems.Advances in Computational Mathematics, 48(2), 2022

    Lothar Nannen and Markus Wess. Complex-scaled infinite elements for resonance problems in hetero- geneous open systems.Advances in Computational Mathematics, 48(2), 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Radial Perfectly Matched Layers and Infinite Elements for the Anisotropic Wave Equation.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 57(3):3171– 3216, 2025

    Martin Halla, Maryna Kachanovska, and Markus Wess. Radial Perfectly Matched Layers and Infinite Elements for the Anisotropic Wave Equation.SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis, 57(3):3171– 3216, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    Numerical solution of problems in unbounded regions: coordi- nate transforms.Journal of Computational Physics, 25(3):273–295, 1977

    Chester E Grosch and Steven A Orszag. Numerical solution of problems in unbounded regions: coordi- nate transforms.Journal of Computational Physics, 25(3):273–295, 1977

    1977

  30. [30]

    The optimization of convergence for Chebyshev polynomial methods in an unbounded domain.Journal of computational physics, 45(1):43–79, 1982

    John P Boyd. The optimization of convergence for Chebyshev polynomial methods in an unbounded domain.Journal of computational physics, 45(1):43–79, 1982

    1982

  31. [31]

    Courier Corporation, 2001

    John P Boyd.Chebyshev and Fourier spectral methods. Courier Corporation, 2001

    2001

  32. [32]

    Some recent advances on spectral methods for unbounded domains.J

    Jie Shen and Li-Lian Wang. Some recent advances on spectral methods for unbounded domains.J. Commun. Comput. Phys, 5:195–241, 2009

    2009

  33. [33]

    Approximations by orthonormal mapped Chebyshev func- tions for higher-dimensional problems in unbounded domains.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 265:264–275, 2014

    Jie Shen, Li-Lian Wang, and Haijun Yu. Approximations by orthonormal mapped Chebyshev func- tions for higher-dimensional problems in unbounded domains.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 265:264–275, 2014

    2014

  34. [34]

    A Truly Exact Perfect Absorbing Layer for Time-Harmonic Acoustic Wave Scattering Problems.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(2):A1027–A1061, 2021

    Zhiguo Yang, Li-Lian Wang, and Yang Gao. A Truly Exact Perfect Absorbing Layer for Time-Harmonic Acoustic Wave Scattering Problems.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 43(2):A1027–A1061, 2021. 24

    2021

  35. [35]

    A novel pml-type technique for acoustic scattering prob- lems based on a real coordinate transformation.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 47(1):A153– A180, 2025

    Jiangxing Wang, Li-Lian Wang, and Bo Wang. A novel pml-type technique for acoustic scattering prob- lems based on a real coordinate transformation.SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 47(1):A153– A180, 2025

    2025

  36. [36]

    A Robust Helmholtz-Decomposition-Based Real Compressed Layer Method for Time-Harmonic Elastic Wave Scattering

    Li-Lian Wang and Lu Zhang. A robust helmholtz-decomposition-based real compressed layer method for time-harmonic elastic wave scattering.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.12974, 2026

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  37. [37]

    Hyperboloidal foliations and scri-fixing.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25:145002, 2008

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu. Hyperboloidal foliations and scri-fixing.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 25:145002, 2008

    2008

  38. [38]

    Asymptotic properties of fields and space-times.Physical Review Letters, 10:66–68, 1963

    Roger Penrose. Asymptotic properties of fields and space-times.Physical Review Letters, 10:66–68, 1963

    1963

  39. [39]

    Zero rest-mass fields including gravitation: asymptotic behavior.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 284:159–203, 1965

    Roger Penrose. Zero rest-mass fields including gravitation: asymptotic behavior.Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A, 284:159–203, 1965

    1965

  40. [40]

    Robert H. Gowdy. The wave equation in asymptotically retarded time coordinates: Waves as simple, regular functions on a compact manifold.Journal of Mathematical Physics, 22(4):675–678, April 1981

    1981

  41. [41]

    Cauchy problems for the conformal vacuum field equations in general relativity

    Helmut Friedrich. Cauchy problems for the conformal vacuum field equations in general relativity. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 91:445–472, 1983

    1983

  42. [42]

    Conformal infinity.Living Reviews in Relativity, 7(1):1, 2004

    J¨ org Frauendiener. Conformal infinity.Living Reviews in Relativity, 7(1):1, 2004

    2004

  43. [43]

    A geometric framework for black hole perturbations.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 83(12):127502, 2011

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu. A geometric framework for black hole perturbations.Physical Review D—Particles, Fields, Gravitation, and Cosmology, 83(12):127502, 2011

    2011

  44. [44]

    A hyperboloidal study of tail decay rates for scalar and Yang–Mills fields.Classical and quantum gravity, 25(17):175013, 2008

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu. A hyperboloidal study of tail decay rates for scalar and Yang–Mills fields.Classical and quantum gravity, 25(17):175013, 2008

    2008

  45. [45]

    Asymptotics of Schwarzschild black hole perturbations.Classical and Quantum Grav- ity, 27(4):045015, 2010

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu. Asymptotics of Schwarzschild black hole perturbations.Classical and Quantum Grav- ity, 27(4):045015, 2010

    2010

  46. [46]

    Null infinity waveforms from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in Kerr spacetime.Physical Review X, 1:021017, 2011

    Anıl Zengino˘ glu and Gaurav Khanna. Null infinity waveforms from extreme-mass-ratio inspirals in Kerr spacetime.Physical Review X, 1:021017, 2011

    2011

  47. [47]

    Binary black hole coalescence in the large-mass-ratio limit: The hyperboloidal layer method and waveforms at null infinity.Physical Review D, 84:084026, 2011

    Sebastiano Bernuzzi, Alessandro Nagar, and Anıl Zengino˘ glu. Binary black hole coalescence in the large-mass-ratio limit: The hyperboloidal layer method and waveforms at null infinity.Physical Review D, 84:084026, 2011

    2011

  48. [48]

    Spherical symmetry as a test case for uncon- strained hyperboloidal evolution.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32:175010, 2015

    Alex Va˜ n´ o-Vi˜ nuales, Sascha Husa, and David Hilditch. Spherical symmetry as a test case for uncon- strained hyperboloidal evolution.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 32:175010, 2015

    2015

  49. [49]

    Pseudospectrum and black hole quasinormal mode instability.Physical Review X, 11(3):031003, 2021

    Jos´ e Luis Jaramillo, Rodrigo Panosso Macedo, and Lamis Al Sheikh. Pseudospectrum and black hole quasinormal mode instability.Physical Review X, 11(3):031003, 2021

    2021

  50. [50]

    Quasinormal modes in kerr spacetime as a 2d eigenvalue problem.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42(24):245008, 2025

    Jamil Assaad and Rodrigo Panosso Macedo. Quasinormal modes in kerr spacetime as a 2d eigenvalue problem.Classical and Quantum Gravity, 42(24):245008, 2025

    2025

  51. [51]

    Hyperboloidal approach to quasinormal modes.Frontiers in Physics, 12:1497601, 2025

    Rodrigo Panosso Macedo and Anıl Zengino˘ glu. Hyperboloidal approach to quasinormal modes.Frontiers in Physics, 12:1497601, 2025

    2025

  52. [52]

    Sch¨ oberl

    J. Sch¨ oberl. Netgen - an advancing front 2d/3d-mesh generator based on abstract rules.Comput. Visual. Sci, 1:41–52, 1997

    1997

  53. [53]

    Sch¨ oberl

    J. Sch¨ oberl. C++11 implementation of finite elements in ngsolve. Preprint 30/2014, Institute of Analysis and Scientific Computing, TU Wien, 2014. 25

    2014

  54. [54]

    Computing scattering resonances using perfectly matched layers with frequency dependent scaling functions.BIT, 58(2):373–395, 2018

    Lothar Nannen and Markus Wess. Computing scattering resonances using perfectly matched layers with frequency dependent scaling functions.BIT, 58(2):373–395, 2018

    2018

  55. [55]

    H. G. Schneider, R. Berg, L. Gilroy, I. Karasalo, I. MacGillivray, M. ter Morshuizen, and A. Volker. Acoustic scattering by a submarine: Results from a benchmark target strength simulation workshop. In Proceedings of the Tenth International Congress on Sound and Vibration, pages 2475–2482, Stockholm, Sweden, 2003

    2003

  56. [56]

    Benchmark target strength simulation models

    Jon Vegard Ven˚ as. Benchmark target strength simulation models. Data set, 2019. File used: BeTSSi mod.stp

    2019

  57. [57]

    Isogeometric boundary element method for acoustic scattering by a submarine.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 359:112670, 2020

    Jon Vegard Ven˚ as and Trond Kvamsdal. Isogeometric boundary element method for acoustic scattering by a submarine.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 359:112670, 2020. 26

    2020