pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25416 · v1 · pith:ZC7OGAOVnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con

Emergence of Quasi-two-dimensional Superconductivity in W-doped Bulk Noncentrosymmetric 3R-TaSe₂

P. Manna , R. P. Singh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 20:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.supr-con
keywords superconductivityquasi-two-dimensionalnoncentrosymmetricTaSe2rotational symmetryBKT transitionupper critical fieldW doping
0
0 comments X

The pith

W-doped 3R-TaSe2 develops quasi-two-dimensional superconductivity where magnetotransport shows two-fold symmetry breaking the crystal's three-fold symmetry.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reports that single crystals of W-doped 3R-TaSe2 exhibit superconductivity at 2.82 K with characteristics of quasi-two-dimensional behavior, including a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition and an in-plane upper critical field 1.7 times above the Pauli limit. Angular dependence of the critical field further supports the low dimensionality. Most strikingly, magnetotransport measurements uncover a two-fold rotational symmetry in the superconducting state under in-plane magnetic fields, which violates the expected three-fold symmetry of the lattice. This combination positions the doped material as a bulk platform for studying unconventional low-dimensional superconductivity in noncentrosymmetric systems.

Core claim

W-doped bulk noncentrosymmetric 3R-TaSe2 hosts weakly coupled anisotropic unconventional superconductivity at Tc = 2.82 K with quasi-two-dimensional nature revealed by BKT transition and Hc2 angular dependence, and crucially exhibits two-fold rotational symmetry in the superconducting state under in-plane fields that breaks the three-fold lattice symmetry.

What carries the argument

The two-fold rotational symmetry observed in magnetotransport within the superconducting state under in-plane fields, which breaks the underlying three-fold lattice symmetry.

Load-bearing premise

The interpretation of intrinsic quasi-two-dimensional superconductivity and symmetry breaking assumes that the single crystals are homogeneous without significant disorder or domain effects producing the observed features.

What would settle it

If high-quality samples show consistent three-fold symmetry in the superconducting state magnetotransport or if the BKT-like transition is absent in cleaner crystals, the claim of intrinsic quasi-2D superconductivity tied to broken symmetry would be challenged.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25416 by P. Manna, R. P. Singh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) shows the crystal structure of 3R￾Ta0.9W0.1Se2, generated by VESTA software [35]. The Ri￾etveld refinement [36] of the powder X-ray diffraction pat￾terns at room-temperature of the crushed crystal (shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (a) The variation of lower critical field ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) The Debye-Sommerfeld model is used to fit the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Electrical resistivity versus magnetic field measured at multiple angles shows an anisotropic characteristic. Inset: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) and (b) Angle-dependent normalized resistivity under various temperatures and magnetic fields in the superconducting [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Noncentrosymmetric transition-metal dichalcogenides offer a rich environment for the study of unconventional superconducting phenomena. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of single-crystalline W-doped 3$R$-TaSe$_2$, revealing weakly coupled anisotropic unconventional superconductivity at $T_c$ = 2.82(2) K, with an in-plane upper critical field exceeding the Pauli limit by 1.7 times. The angular dependence of the upper critical field, along with the observation of a Berezinskii-Kosterlitz-Thouless transition, reveals quasi-two-dimensional superconductivity. Crucially, magnetotransport reveals a distinct two-fold rotational symmetry within the superconducting state under in-plane fields, breaking the underlying three-fold lattice symmetry. These findings establish W-doped $3R\text{-TaSe}_2$ as a bulk model system for exploring intrinsic low-dimensional superconductivity and broken rotational symmetry, thus opening new directions for future quantum technologies.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports experimental results on single-crystalline W-doped 3R-TaSe2, claiming weakly coupled anisotropic unconventional superconductivity with Tc = 2.82(2) K. Key observations include an in-plane upper critical field exceeding the Pauli limit by a factor of 1.7, angular dependence of Hc2 and a BKT-like transition indicating quasi-two-dimensional superconductivity, and crucially a two-fold rotational symmetry in magnetotransport under in-plane fields that breaks the three-fold lattice symmetry. The work positions the material as a bulk model system for intrinsic low-dimensional superconductivity and broken rotational symmetry.

Significance. If the two-fold symmetry is shown to be intrinsic rather than extrinsic, the result would be significant for the field as it supplies a bulk noncentrosymmetric platform exhibiting quasi-2D behavior with unexpected rotational symmetry breaking, potentially relevant to studies of unconventional pairing and low-dimensional quantum phenomena. The paper supplies standard magnetotransport and critical-field data supporting the quasi-2D assignment, which strengthens the case if homogeneity is adequately demonstrated.

major comments (2)
  1. [Magnetotransport under in-plane fields] Magnetotransport under in-plane fields section: the central claim that the observed two-fold rotational symmetry is intrinsic to the quasi-2D superconducting state (and breaks the three-fold lattice symmetry) is load-bearing for the headline result. The manuscript does not appear to include explicit controls or data (e.g., rocking-curve widths, spatially resolved resistivity maps, or STM/AFM images) demonstrating sample homogeneity and the absence of domain walls or twinning that could produce anisotropic vortex pinning or current distribution effects.
  2. [BKT transition and Hc2 anisotropy] BKT transition and Hc2 anisotropy subsection: while the BKT identification and Hc2 angular dependence are used to establish the quasi-2D character, the manuscript supplies no quantitative error bars, fitting details, or comparison to alternative (e.g., 3D anisotropic) models in the relevant figures or text, leaving the robustness of the quasi-2D assignment open to question when linked to the symmetry-breaking interpretation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states numerical values such as Tc = 2.82(2) K and the 1.7 imes Pauli-limit factor without referencing the corresponding figures or tables; cross-references should be added for clarity.
  2. [Title and abstract] Notation for the crystal structure (3$R$-TaSe2) is used inconsistently in the title versus the abstract; standardize throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying key points that require clarification. We address each major comment below with point-by-point responses. Revisions will be made to strengthen the presentation of sample homogeneity and the quantitative analysis of the BKT transition and Hc2 anisotropy.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Magnetotransport under in-plane fields] Magnetotransport under in-plane fields section: the central claim that the observed two-fold rotational symmetry is intrinsic to the quasi-2D superconducting state (and breaks the three-fold lattice symmetry) is load-bearing for the headline result. The manuscript does not appear to include explicit controls or data (e.g., rocking-curve widths, spatially resolved resistivity maps, or STM/AFM images) demonstrating sample homogeneity and the absence of domain walls or twinning that could produce anisotropic vortex pinning or current distribution effects.

    Authors: We agree that explicit demonstration of sample homogeneity is important for establishing the intrinsic nature of the two-fold symmetry breaking. The current manuscript relies on the sharp superconducting transition width implied by Tc = 2.82(2) K, reproducibility across multiple crystals, and the fact that the anisotropy is confined to the superconducting state (normal-state magnetotransport shows no such breaking). However, we acknowledge that dedicated controls such as rocking-curve data or spatial mapping are not presented. In the revised manuscript we will add available X-ray diffraction rocking-curve results and a brief discussion of why domain-wall or twinning effects are unlikely given the temperature and field dependence of the observed anisotropy. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [BKT transition and Hc2 anisotropy] BKT transition and Hc2 anisotropy subsection: while the BKT identification and Hc2 angular dependence are used to establish the quasi-2D character, the manuscript supplies no quantitative error bars, fitting details, or comparison to alternative (e.g., 3D anisotropic) models in the relevant figures or text, leaving the robustness of the quasi-2D assignment open to question when linked to the symmetry-breaking interpretation.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The BKT transition is identified via the power-law exponent in current-voltage characteristics approaching 3, and the Hc2 angular dependence is compared to the Tinkham 2D model. To improve robustness, the revised manuscript will include error bars on all relevant data points, explicit fitting parameters and uncertainties for both the BKT and Hc2 analyses, and a direct comparison of the angular Hc2 data to a 3D anisotropic Ginzburg-Landau model to quantify why the 2D description is preferred. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations only

full rationale

The paper is a purely experimental report on magnetotransport and superconductivity measurements in W-doped 3R-TaSe2 single crystals. It presents raw data (Tc = 2.82 K, Hc2 anisotropy, BKT-like transition, two-fold symmetry in in-plane fields) and interprets them as evidence for quasi-2D behavior and broken rotational symmetry. No equations, derivations, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or self-citations appear in the provided text. All claims rest on direct measurement rather than any chain that reduces to its own inputs by construction. This is the expected outcome for an experimental manuscript with no theoretical modeling.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

No theoretical model, equations, or derivations appear in the abstract; all content consists of experimental observations, so no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5703 in / 1218 out tokens · 26843 ms · 2026-06-25T20:13:52.504382+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    (5)) [49]

    and the Tinkham model (Eq. (5)) [49]. The for- mer describes the angular variation in three-dimensional (3D) superconductors, with an ellipsoidal form ofHc2(θ), whereas the latter accounts for two-dimensional (2D) thin- film superconductors and predicts a characteristic cusp at θ = 90◦. Therefore, fitting the experimental data to these models allows us to...

    2023

  2. [2]

    Lian,Phys

    C.-S. Lian,Phys. Rev. B2023,107, 4 045431. 8

  3. [3]

    D. Qiu, C. Gong, S. Wang, M. Zhang, C. Yang, X. Wang, J. Xiong,Adv. Mater.2021,33, 18 2006124

    2021

  4. [4]

    Dogra, R

    G.Venditti, J.Biscaras, S.Hurand, N.Bergeal, J.Lesueur, A. Dogra, R. C. Budhani, M. Mondal, J. Jesudasan, P. Raychaudhuri, S. Caprara, L. Benfatto,Phys. Rev. B 2019,100064506

    2019

  5. [5]

    X. Xi, Z. Wang, W. Zhao, J.-H. Park, K. T. Law, H. Berger, L. Forró, J. Shan, K. F. Mak,Nat. Phys. 2016,12, 2 139

    2016

  6. [6]

    Patra, T

    C. Patra, T. Agarwal, R. Verma, P. Manna, S. Srivastava, R. S. Singh, M. S. Scheurer, B. Singh, R. P. Singh,Phys. Rev. Lett.2025, –

    2025

  7. [7]

    Hamill, B

    A. Hamill, B. Heischmidt, E. Sohn, D. Shaffer, K.-T. Tsai, X. Zhang, X. Xi, A. Suslov, H. Berger, L. Forró, et al., Nat. phys.2021,17, 8 949

    2021

  8. [8]

    S. C. De la Barrera, M. R. Sinko, D. P. Gopalan, N. Sivadas, K. L. Seyler, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, A. W. Tsen, X. Xu, D. Xiao, B. M. Hunt,Nat. Commun. 2018,9, 1 1427

    2018

  9. [9]

    Möckli, M

    D. Möckli, M. Khodas,Phys. Rev. B2019,99180505(R)

  10. [10]

    N. F. Q. Yuan, K. F. Mak, K. T. Law,Phys. Rev. Lett. 2014,113097001

    2014

  11. [11]

    Z. Li, P. Lyu, Z. Chen, D. Guan, S. Yu, J. Zhao, P. Huang, X. Zhou, Z. Qiu, H. Fang, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, F. Song, K. P. Loh, Y. Zheng, Z.-X. Shen, K. S. Novoselov, J. Lu, Adv. Mater.2024,36, 24 2312341

    2024

  12. [12]

    Devarakonda, H

    A. Devarakonda, H. Inoue, S. Fang, C. Ozsoy-Keskinbora, T. Suzuki, M. Kriener, L. Fu, E. Kaxiras, D. C. Bell, J. G. Checkelsky,Science2020,370, 6513 231

  13. [13]

    L. K. Ma, M. Z. Shi, B. L. Kang, K. L. Peng, F. B. Meng, C. S. Zhu, J. H. Cui, Z. L. Sun, D. H. Ma, H. H. Wang, B. Lei, T. Wu, X. H. Chen,Phys. Rev. Mater.2020,4 124803

    2020

  14. [14]

    J. Lu, O. Zheliuk, I. Leermakers, N. F. Yuan, U. Zeitler, K. T. Law, J. Ye,Science2015,350, 6266 1353

  15. [15]

    Patra, T

    C. Patra, T. Agarwal, R. R. Chaudhari, R. P. Singh,Phys. Rev. B2022,106134515

  16. [16]

    Agarwal, C

    T. Agarwal, C. Patra, A. Kataria, R. R. Chowdhury, R. Singh,Phys. Rev. B2023,107, 17 174509

  17. [18]

    K. Fan, M. Shi, H. Li, Z. Xiang, X. Chen,Phys. Rev. Mater.2025,9, 3 034804

    2025

  18. [19]

    Agarwal, C

    T. Agarwal, C. Patra, P. Manna, S. Srivastava, P. Mishra, S. Sharma, R. P. Singh,Phys. Rev. B2025,112014501

  19. [20]

    Q. Hu, J. Y. Liu, Q. Shi, F. J. Zhang, Y. Zhong, L. Lei, R. Ang,Europhys. Lett.2021,135, 5 57003

    2021

  20. [21]

    H. Wang, Y. Jiao, F. Meng, X. Zhang, D. Dai, C. Tu, C. Zhao, L. Xin, S. Huang, H. Lei, S. Li,Phys. Rev. Lett. 2025,135126002

    2025

  21. [22]

    S.-B. Liu, C. Tian, Y. Fang, H. Rong, L. Cao, X. Wei, H. Cui, M. Chen, D. Chen, Y. Song, J. Cui, J. Li, S. Guan, S. Jia, C. Chen, W. He, F. Huang, Y. Jiang, J. Mao, X. C. Xie, K. T. Law, J.-H. Chen,Nat. Commun.2024,15, 1 7569

    2024

  22. [23]

    S. Roy, A. Kreisel, B. M. Andersen, S. Mukherjee,Phys. Rev. B2026,113014506

  23. [24]

    Ribak, R

    A. Ribak, R. M. Skiff, M. Mograbi, P. K. Rout, M. H. Fischer, J. Ruhman, K. Chashka, Y. Dagan, A. Kanigel, Science Advances2020,6, 13 eaax9480

  24. [25]

    Z. Xie, Z. Chen, M. Yang, L. Liao, J. Deng, B. Song, X. Chen, Z. Liu, J. Yan, X. Huang, L.-g. Jia, Y. Huang, X. Chen, L. Zhang, Z. Cheng, J.-g. Guo,Adv. Funct. Mater.2025,35, 32 2501453

    2025

  25. [26]

    H. Luo, W. Xie, E. M. Seibel, R. J. Cava,J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2015,27, 36 365701

  26. [27]

    Y. Deng, Y. Lai, X. Zhao, X. Wang, C. Zhu, K. Huang, C. Zhu, J. Zhou, Q. Zeng, R. Duan, Q. Fu, L. Kang, Y. Liu, S. J. Pennycook, X. R. Wang, Z. Liu,Journal of the American Chemical Society2020,142, 6 2948, pMID: 31961673

  27. [28]

    D. Bhoi, S. Khim, W. Nam, B. Lee, C. Kim, B.-G. Jeon, B. Min, S. Park, K. H. Kim,Sci. Rep.2016,6, 1 24068

    2016

  28. [29]

    Dharmasiri, M

    K. Dharmasiri, M. Avdeev, D. Louca,arXiv:2602.11582 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  29. [30]

    H. Bai, M. Wang, X. Yang, Y. Li, J. Ma, X. Sun, Q. Tao, L. Li, Z.-A. Xu,J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2018,30, 9 095703

  30. [31]

    Lawan Adam, I

    M. Lawan Adam, I. Buba Garba, A. Alhaji Bala, A. Aji Suleiman, S. Muhammad Gana, F. Lawan Adam, Phys. Rev. B2023,107104510

  31. [32]

    H. Luo, W. Xie, J. Tao, H. Inoue, A. Gyenis, J. W. Krizan, A. Yazdani, Y. Zhu, R. J. Cava,Proc. Natl. Acad. of Sci. 2015,112, 11 E1174

    2015

  32. [33]

    Y. Qi, Q. Yang, P. Zhu, D. Hu, X. Chen, H. Ren, P. Duan, J. Xiao, Z. Wang, X. Li,J. Mater. Chem. C2026

  33. [34]

    Zheng, X

    B. Zheng, X. Zhang, K. Wang, R. Li, J. Cao, C. Wang, H. Tan, Z. Li, B. Lin, P. Li, C. Xi, J. Zhang, Y. Lu, W. Zhu, Z. Liu, S. A. Yang, L.-J. Li, F. Liu, B. Xiang, Nano Lett.2025,25, 12 4895

    2025

  34. [35]

    Patra, T

    C. Patra, T. Agarwal, S. Srivastava, R. R. Chowdhury, M. Saravanan, R. P. Singh,Adv. Quantum Technol.2024, 7, 2 2300448

    2024

  35. [36]

    Momma, F

    K. Momma, F. Izumi,J. Appl. Cryst.2011,44, 6 1272

    2011

  36. [37]

    Rodríguez-Carvajal,Physica B: Condens

    J. Rodríguez-Carvajal,Physica B: Condens. Matter1993, 192, 1 55

  37. [38]

    Bjerkelund, A

    E. Bjerkelund, A. Kjekshus, Å. Nilsson, J. Sandström, H. Theorell, R. Blinc, S. Paušak, L. Ehrenberg, J. Du- manović,Acta Chem. Scand.1967,21513

    1967

  38. [39]

    See supplemental material for additional details on powder XRD data, EDAX data, magnetization, resistivity, and Uemura plot, which includes refs. [51-65]

  39. [40]

    Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity, Courier Corporation,2004

    M. Tinkham,Introduction to superconductivity, Courier Corporation,2004

    2004

  40. [41]

    M. Shi, K. Fan, H. Li, S. Pan, J. Cai, N. Zhang, H. Li, T. Wu, J. Zhang, C. Xi, Z. Xiang, X. Chen,J. Am. Chem. Soc.2024,146, 49 33413

    2024

  41. [42]

    B. S. Chandrasekhar,Appl. Phys. Lett.1962,17

    1962

  42. [43]

    A. M. Clogston,Phys. Rev. Lett.1962,9266

    1962

  43. [44]

    Zhang, A

    H. Zhang, A. Rousuli, K. Zhang, L. Luo, C. Guo, X. Cong, Z.Lin, C.Bao, H.Zhang, S.Xu, R.Feng, S.Shen, K.Zhao, W. Yao, Y. Wu, S. Ji, X. Chen, P. Tan, Q.-K. Xue, Y. Xu, W. Duan, P. Yu, S. Zhou,Nat. Phys.2022,18, 12 1425

    2022

  44. [45]

    Palstra, B

    T. Palstra, B. Batlogg, L. Schneemeyer, R. Van Dover, J. V. Waszczak,Phys. Rev. B1988,38, 7 5102

  45. [46]

    J. L. Vicent, S. J. Hillenius, R. V. Coleman,Phys. Rev. Lett.1980,44892

    1980

  46. [47]

    S. Ni, M. Zhou, K. Shi, L. Chen, J. Yi, M. Zhang, Y. Han, J. Wu, Z. Li, Z. Xu, C. Xi, Z.-A. Ren, Z. Wang,Phys. Rev. B2024,110174511

  47. [48]

    W. Wan, R. Harsh, P. Dreher, F. de Juan, M. M. Ugeda, npj 2D Mater. Appl.2023,7, 1 41

    2023

  48. [49]

    J. M. Pereira, D. Tezze, I. Niehues, Y. Asensio, H. Yang, L. Mester, S. Chen, F. Casanova, A. M. Bittner, M. Or- maza, F. Schiller, B. Martín-García, R. Hillenbrand, L. E. Hueso, M. Gobbi,Adv. Func. Mater.2022,32, 52 2208761

    2022

  49. [50]

    Tinkham,Phys

    M. Tinkham,Phys. Rev.1963,1292413. 9

    1963

  50. [51]

    Takiguchi, Y

    K. Takiguchi, Y. Krockenberger, Y. Taniyasu, H. Ya- mamoto,Phys. Rev. B2024,110, 2 024516

  51. [52]

    W. L. McMillan,Phys. Rev.1968,167331

    1968

  52. [53]

    Padamsee, J

    H. Padamsee, J. Neighbor, C. Shiffman,J. Low Temp. Phys.1973,12387

    1973

  53. [54]

    Y. J. Uemura, G. M. Luke, B. J. Sternlieb, J. H. Brewer, J. F. Carolan, W. N. Hardy, R. Kadono, J. R. Kempton, R. F. Kiefl, S. R. Kreitzman, P. Mulhern, T. M. Rise- man, D. L. Williams, B. X. Yang, S. Uchida, H. Takagi, J. Gopalakrishnan, A. W. Sleight, M. A. Subramanian, C. L. Chien, M. Z. Cieplak, G. Xiao, V. Y. Lee, B. W. Statt, C. E. Stronach, W. J. K...

    1989

  54. [55]

    Z. Wang, J. Yuan, J. Wosnitza, H. Zhou, Y. Huang, K. Jin, F. Zhou, X. Dong, Z. Zhao,J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2017,29, 2 025701

    2017

  55. [56]

    Keller, J

    N. Keller, J. L. Tholence, A. Huxley, J. Flouquet,Phys. Rev. Lett.1994,732364

    1994

  56. [57]

    Manna, S

    P. Manna, S. Sharma, T. Agarwal, S. Srivastava, P. Mishra, R. Singh,arXiv:2511.006052025

    work page arXiv

  57. [58]

    Manna, C

    P. Manna, C. Patra, T. Agarwal, S. Srivastava, S. Sharma, P. Mishra, R. P. Singh,arXiv:2601.018152026

    work page arXiv

  58. [59]

    J. L. Zhang, L. Jiao, F. F. Balakirev, X. C. Wang, C. Q. Jin, H. Q. Yuan,Phys. Rev. B2011,83174506

  59. [60]

    Kurita, K

    N. Kurita, K. Kitagawa, K. Matsubayashi, A. Kismara- hardja, E.-S. Choi, J. S. Brooks, Y. Uwatoko, S. Uji, T. Terashima,J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.2010,80, 1 013706

    2010

  60. [61]

    F. Soto, H. Berger, L. Cabo, C. Carballeira, J. Mosqueira, D. Pavuna, P. Toimil, F. Vidal,Physica C: Supercon- ductivity2007,460-462789, proceedings of the 8th In- ternational Conference on Materials and Mechanisms of Superconductivity and High Temperature Superconduc- tors

  61. [62]

    Cheng, J

    J. Cheng, J. Bai, B. Ruan, P. Liu, Y. Huang, Q. Dong, Y. Huang, Y. Sun, C. Li, L. Zhang, Q. Liu, W. Zhu, Z. Ren, G. Chen,J. Am. Chem. Soc.2024,146, 9 5908

    2024

  62. [63]

    Keller, J

    N. Keller, J. Brison, P. Lejay, J. Tholence, A. Huxley, L. Schmidt, A. Buzdin, J. Flouquet,Physica B: Con- dens. Matter1995,206-207568, proceedings of the In- ternational Conference on Strongly Correlated Electron Systems

  63. [64]

    Scheidt, M

    E.-W. Scheidt, M. Herzinger, A. Fischer, D. Schmitz, J. Reiners, F. Mayr, F. Loder, M. Baenitz, W. Scherer, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter2015,27, 15 155701

  64. [65]

    Y. Yang, S. Fang, V. Fatemi, J. Ruhman, E. Navarro- Moratalla, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, P. Jarillo-Herrero,Phys. Rev. B2018,98035203

  65. [66]

    Abdel-Hafiez, X.-M

    M. Abdel-Hafiez, X.-M. Zhao, A. A. Kordyuk, Y.-W. Fang, B. Pan, Z. He, C.-G. Duan, J. Zhao, X.-J. Chen, Sci. Rep.2016,6, 1 31824

    2016