Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 104 references

Evolved massive stars and their impact on their environment

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-25 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The Square Kilometre Array will overcome observational limits on circumstellar environments of massive stars to connect them to supernovae.

desk verdict This is a perspective piece arguing SKA will enable CSE studies that connect to supernova outcomes, but the link is asserted without any mechanism or example. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.25607 v1 pith:UISDPL7G submitted 2026-06-24 astro-ph.SR astro-ph.HE

C.S. Buemi , G. Umana , C. Trigilio , C. Bordiu , F. Bufano , J. van den Eijnden , S. Orlando , P. Leto
show 10 more authors
F. Bocchino M. Miceli M. Pérez-Torres A. Alberdi F. Cavallaro L. Cerrigone A. Ingallinera S. Loru S. Riggi A.C. Ruggeri
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRastro-ph.HE
keywords evolvedmassivestarscircumstellarenvironmentstellarwindssupernovaeSquareKilometreArraymasslossWolf-Rayetluminousbluevariables
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review paper establishes that the study of circumstellar environments around evolved massive stars is essential for understanding how stellar winds and mass loss shape the conditions for supernova explosions. It focuses on the transitional phases from red supergiants through luminous blue variables to Wolf-Rayet stars, where eruptive events create nebulae that interact with supernova ejecta. Current limitations in resolution and sensitivity prevent detailed characterization of these environments. The paper claims that the Square Kilometre Array's high spatial resolution, sensitivity, and wide frequency coverage will resolve these issues.

What carries the argument

The Square Kilometre Array's capabilities in combining high spatial resolution, sensitivity, and wide frequency coverage for radio observations of circumstellar environments.

What would settle it

If SKA observations of circumstellar environments around evolved massive stars do not yield new information that constrains their influence on supernova properties, the asserted benefit would not hold.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The final stages of massive star evolution involve stellar winds and circumstellar environments that profoundly shape the surroundings in which supernovae explode. The Square Kilometre Array, with its high spatial resolution, sensitivity and wide frequency coverage, will address the most critical observational issues that currently prevent detailed characterization of circumstellar environments and thus limit our ability to constrain its connections to supernova and remnant properties.

Load-bearing premise

Overcoming current observational limitations on characterizing circumstellar environments will directly enable constraints on their connections to supernova and remnant properties.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Such characterization will directly prove the mass-loss activity of the star through wind and eruptive events.
  • The shaped environment will be shown to heavily affect supernovae spectrophotometric signatures through interaction with ejecta.
  • Constraints will be placed on connections between circumstellar environments and supernova remnant properties.
  • Understanding of pre-supernova progenitors will improve by focusing on their nebulae.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Future SKA data could be used to model the specific mass-loss histories of individual massive stars.
  • Improved CSE characterization might help distinguish between different supernova types based on progenitor mass loss.
  • Connections to remnant properties could influence models of how massive stars contribute to interstellar medium enrichment.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that studying stellar winds and circumstellar environments (CSE) around evolved massive stars (Red Supergiants, Luminous Blue Variables, and Wolf-Rayet stars) is essential for understanding mass-loss activity and its effects on the environments in which supernovae explode. It further asserts that the Square Kilometre Array's combination of high spatial resolution, sensitivity, and wide frequency coverage will resolve current observational limitations on CSE characterization and thereby enable constraints on connections between CSE and supernova/remnant properties.

Significance. If the central linkage holds, the work could usefully flag an observational opportunity for SKA in massive-star and supernova-progenitor research. However, the absence of any data, derivations, error analysis, cited models, or concrete diagnostics means the significance is restricted to a qualitative call for future observations rather than a substantiated advance.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that SKA 'will adress the most critical observational issues that currently prevent detailed characterization of CSE and, thus limit our ability to constrain its connections to supernova and remnants proprierties' is unsupported. No mechanism, reference, or example is supplied showing how specific CSE observables (density profiles, kinematics, or abundances) would map onto supernova light-curve parameters or remnant morphologies; this 'thus' step is load-bearing for the paper's motivation yet remains an assertion without evidence.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: Spelling and grammar errors ('adress' → 'address'; 'proprierties' → 'properties'). The second paragraph is a single run-on sentence whose logical structure is unclear.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The first paragraph contains a lengthy compound sentence that would benefit from splitting or rephrasing for readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their review. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The claim that SKA 'will adress the most critical observational issues that currently prevent detailed characterization of CSE and, thus limit our ability to constrain its connections to supernova and remnants proprierties' is unsupported. No mechanism, reference, or example is supplied showing how specific CSE observables (density profiles, kinematics, or abundances) would map onto supernova light-curve parameters or remnant morphologies; this 'thus' step is load-bearing for the paper's motivation yet remains an assertion without evidence.

    Authors: This is a perspective paper whose purpose is to flag an observational opportunity with SKA rather than to derive new mappings. The manuscript text already states that the CSE 'interacting with the ejecta, will heavily affect supernovae spectrophotometric signatures,' and the broader CSE-SN connection is supported by the existing literature on ejecta-CSM interaction. Nevertheless, we agree that the abstract would be strengthened by a brief concrete illustration. We will revise the abstract to include one short example (e.g., how a dense, asymmetric CSE can produce both enhanced early light-curve luminosity and asymmetric remnant morphology) together with a pointer to the relevant literature. This change will make the 'thus' step explicit without converting the paper into a review. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: purely descriptive claims with no derivations or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The manuscript is a perspective piece on massive-star mass loss and SKA prospects. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no derivation chain, and no load-bearing self-citations. The sole forward-looking assertion (“will address … and, thus limit our ability to constrain”) is an empirical claim about future instrumentation rather than a result obtained by substituting one expression for another or by renaming a fitted quantity. Because no step reduces to its own inputs by construction, the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 1 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper is a review relying on standard astrophysical domain knowledge about stellar evolution and mass loss; no free parameters, new axioms, or invented entities are introduced.

assumptions (1)
  • domain assumption Mass loss via winds and eruptions from evolved massive stars shapes the circumstellar environment, which then interacts with supernova ejecta to affect observed properties.
    This premise is stated directly in the abstract as the basis for why CSE studies matter for supernovae.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Evolved massive stars and their impact on their environment." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UISDPL7G

@misc{pith2026260625607,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Evolved massive stars and their impact on their environment},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UISDPL7G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.25607}
}
read the original abstract

The comprehension of the final stages of massive star evolution and their path toward the eventual supernova explosion necessarily involves the study of stellar winds and the circumstellar environment (CSE) surrounding them in the transitional phases, during which stellar winds and eruptive mass loss profoundly shape the surrounding environment. The study of the pre-supernova progenitors, from Red Supergiants, passing through the Luminous Blue Variable stage to Wolf-Rayet stars, is of key importance because, focusing on their nebulae, they directly prove the mass-loss activity of the star that, through wind and eruptive events, shapes the environment in which the supernova will explode. Such environment, interacting with the ejecta, will heavily affect supernovae spectrophotometric signatures. The Square Kilometre Array, with its extraordinary capabilities to combine high spatial resolution, sensitivity and wide frequency coverage will adress the most critical observational issues that currently prevent detailed characterization of CSE and, thus limit our ability to constrain its connections to supernova and remnants proprierties.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25607 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. WR 49-1 nebula as observed in SMGPS, compared with MeerKAT and SKA-Mid synthetic images. Left column, top row: SMGPS observation at 1.3 GHz (left) and best-fit model convolved with the corresponding MeerKAT beam (8′′, right). Left column, bottom row: Radial brightness profile with best￾fitting spherical shell model overlaid (left), and the unconvolved model image including an added compact central source (right). Ri… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. SKA detectability test for the WR 75ab nebula at extragalactic distances. Left column: SMGPS observation and best-fit model (same procedure as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Error on spectral index (𝜎𝛼) between SKA-Mid Band 2 (central frequency 1.31 GHz) and Band 5b (central frequency 11.85 GHz) as a function of integration time (sensitivity) for sources of different brightness levels (𝐵). Top panels refer to extended radio emission with positive spectral indices (𝐵1 < 𝐵2). Bottom panels refer to cases where the spectral indices of the brightness are negative (𝐵2 < 𝐵1). Coloured thick s… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The fraction of bow shocks expected to be detectable with SKA-mid (left) and SKA-low (right). We assume detection thresholds of ∼ 9/50 𝜇Jy for SKA-mid/low, respectively, versus typical detection thresholds in current surveys of ∼ 100/200/250 𝜇Jy for SMGPS/EMU/LOFAR. or…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

104 extracted references · 104 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2986. P. Agrawal et al. MNRAS, 512(4):5717–5725, June

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw2986

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac930. F. Aharonian et al. A&A, 666:A124, Oct

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac930

  3. [3]

    2022, , 666, A124, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244323

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244323. 21 Evolved Massive Stars and Environment C. Buemi et al. A. R. Bell. MNRAS, 182:147–156, Jan

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244323

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/182.2.147. P. Benaglia et al. A&A, 517:L10, July

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/182.2.147

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015232. A. Blaauw. Bull. Astron. Inst. Netherlands, 15:265, May

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015232

  6. [6]

    InJ.Mackey,J.S.Vink,andN.St-Louis,editors, MassiveStarsNearandFar , volume361of IAUSymposium,pages447–453,Jan.2024a

    A.Z.Bonanosetal. InJ.Mackey,J.S.Vink,andN.St-Louis,editors, MassiveStarsNearandFar , volume361of IAUSymposium,pages447–453,Jan.2024a. doi: 10.1017/S1743921322002782. A. Z. Bonanos et al. A&A, 686:A77, June 2024b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348527. C. Bordiu, J. R. Rizzo, and A. Ritacco. MNRAS, 482(2):1651–1663, Jan

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921322002782

  7. [7]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3606. C. Bordiu et al. ApJ, 939(2):L30, Nov

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3606

  8. [8]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b10. C. Bordiu et al. A&A, 690:A53, Oct

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b10

Show all 104 references
  1. [9]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450766. C. Bordiu et al. MNRAS, 543(4):3708–3730, Nov. 2025a. doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1667. C. Bordiu et al. A&A, 695:A144, Mar. 2025b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450356. C. Buemi et al. High-resolution radio imaging of circumstellar nebulae around evol...

    doi

  2. [10]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/2/1404. C. S. Buemi et al. MNRAS, 465(4):4147–4158, Mar

    doi

  3. [11]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3074. S. Burgemeister et al. MNRAS, 429(4):3305–3315, Mar

    doi

  4. [12]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts588. M. Cano-González et al. A&A, 692:A23, Dec

    doi

  5. [13]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451771. M. Cano-González et al. A&A, 700:A246, Aug

    doi

  6. [14]

    J.Cantó,A.C.Raga,andL.F.Rodríguez

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202554533. J.Cantó,A.C.Raga,andL.F.Rodríguez. ApJ,536(2):896–901,June2000. doi: 10.1086/308983. C. Cappa, W. M. Goss, and K. A. van der Hucht. AJ, 127(5):2885–2897, May

    doi

  7. [15]

    doi: 10.1086/383286. M. Carretero-Castrillo, M. Ribó, and J. M. Paredes. A&A, 679:A109, Nov

    doi

  8. [16]

    doi: 10.1007/s11214-017-0461-6. A.-N. Chené, N. St-Louis, A. F. J. Moffat, and K. G. Gayley. ApJ, 903(2):113, Nov

    doi

  9. [17]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abba24. R. A. Chevalier. ApJ, 258:790–797, July

    doi

  10. [18]

    doi: 10.1086/160126. J. Chisholm, C. Tremonti, and C. Leitherer. MNRAS, 481(2):1690–1706, Dec

    doi

  11. [19]

    doi: 10.1086/507015. M. Cohen, Q. A. Parker, and A. J. Green. MNRAS, 360(4):1439–1447, July

    doi

  12. [20]

    1365-2966.2005.09137.x

    doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-2966.2005.09137.x. P. A. Crowther. ARA&A, 45(1):177–219, Sept

    2005 doi

  13. [21]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45.051806. 110615. S. Daley-Yates, I. R. Stevens, and T. D. Crossland. MNRAS, 463(3):2735–2745, Dec

    doi

  14. [22]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2184. B. Davies, R. D. Oudmaijer, and J. S. Vink. A&A, 439(3):1107–1125, Sept

    doi

  15. [23]

    doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:20052781. L. Dessart.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2405.04259, May

  16. [24]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.04259. S. M. Dougherty et al. ApJ, 623(1):447–459, Apr

    doi

  17. [25]

    22 Evolved Massive Stars and Environment C

    doi: 10.1086/428494. 22 Evolved Massive Stars and Environment C. Buemi et al. S. M. Dougherty et al. A&A, 511:A58, Feb

    doi

  18. [26]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913505. J. E. Drew. ApJS, 71:267, Oct

    doi

  19. [27]

    doi: 10.1086/191374. G. A. Dulk. ARA&A, 23:169–224, Jan

    doi

  20. [28]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.23.090185.001125. D. Eichler and V. Usov. ApJ, 402:271, Jan

    doi

  21. [29]

    doi: 10.1086/172130. J. J. Eldridge and E. R. Stanway. ARA&A, 60:455–494, Aug

    doi

  22. [30]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321258. R. Fender et al. InMeerKAT Science: On the Pathway to the SKA, page 13, Jan

    doi

  23. [31]

    doi: 10.22323/1.277.0013. B. L. Flores and D. J. Hillier. MNRAS, 504(1):311–325, June

    doi

  24. [32]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab707. A. T. Gallego-Calvente et al. A&A, 664:A49, Aug

    doi

  25. [33]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141895. G. Garcia-Segura, M.-M. Mac Low, and N. Langer. A&A, 305:229, Jan

    doi

  26. [34]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1166. J. H. Groh, G. Meynet, and S. Ekström. A&A, 550:L7, Feb

    doi

  27. [36]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16496.x. R. Hainich et al. A&A, 565:A27, May

    2010 doi

  28. [37]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322696. G. M. Harper, A. Brown, and J. Lim.ApJ, 551:1073–1098,

    doi

  29. [38]

    doi: 10.1086/320215. I. Heywood et al. ApJ, 925(2):165, Feb

    doi

  30. [39]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac449a. Q. Huang et al. AJ, 166(1):23, July

    doi

  31. [40]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/acd92e. R. Ignace. MNRAS, 457(4):4123–4134, Apr

    doi

  32. [41]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw216. A. Ingallinera et al. MNRAS, 437(4):3626–3638, Feb

    doi

  33. [42]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2157. A. Ingallinera et al. MNRAS, 463(1):723–739, Nov

    doi

  34. [43]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2053. T. Jayasinghe et al. MNRAS, 488(1):1141–1165, Sept

    doi

  35. [44]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1738. P. Kervella et al. A&A, 609:A67, Jan

    doi

  36. [45]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731761. H. A. Kobulnicky et al. ApJS, 227(2):18, Dec

    doi

  37. [46]

    doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/227/2/18. R. Kotak and J. S. Vink. A&A, 460(2):L5–L8, Dec

    doi

  38. [47]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20065800. C. C. Lang, K. E. Johnson, W. M. Goss, and L. F. Rodríguez. AJ, 130(5):2185–2196, Nov

    doi

  39. [48]

    doi: 10.1086/496976. N. Langer. ARA&A, 50:107–164, Sept

    doi

  40. [49]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125534. C. Leitherer and C. Robert. ApJ, 377:629, Aug

    doi

  41. [50]

    S.LépineandA.F.J.Moffat

    doi: 10.1086/170390. S.LépineandA.F.J.Moffat. AJ,136(2):548–553,Aug.2008. doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/2/548. S. Lépine et al. AJ, 120(6):3201–3217, Dec

    2008 doi

  42. [51]

    doi: 10.1086/316858. S.-C. Leung, S. Wu, and J. Fuller. ApJ, 923(1):41, Dec

    doi

  43. [52]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2c63. S. J. Lipscy, M. Jura, and M. J. Reid. ApJ, 626(1):439–445, June

    doi

  44. [53]

    doi: 10.1086/429900. G. Maravelias et al.Galaxies, 11(3):79, June

    doi

  45. [54]

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies11030079. J. M. Marcaide et al. A&A, 505(3):927–945, Oct

    doi

  46. [55]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912133. A. Marcowith et al. MNRAS, 479(4):4470–4485, Oct

    doi

  47. [56]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1743. R. Margutti et al. ApJ, 835(2):140, Feb

    doi

  48. [57]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/140. I. Martí-Vidal et al. A&A, 526:A143, Feb. 2011a. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201014517. I. Martí-Vidal et al. A&A, 526:A142, Feb. 2011b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200913831. P. Massey, E. Waterhouse, and K. DeGioia-Eastwood. AJ, 119(5):2214–2241, May

    doi

  49. [58]

    Buemi et al

    doi: 23 Evolved Massive Stars and Environment C. Buemi et al. 10.1086/301345. D. McConnell et al. PASA, 37:e048, Nov

    doi

  50. [59]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2020.41. P. G. Mezger and A. P. Henderson. ApJ, 147:471, Feb

    2020 doi

  51. [60]

    doi: 10.1086/149030. M. Miceli et al. A&A, 593:A26, Aug

    doi

  52. [61]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628725. D. Milisavljevic et al. ApJ, 815(2):120, Dec

    doi

  53. [62]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/815/2/120. D. R. Mizuno et al. AJ, 139(4):1542–1552, Apr

    doi

  54. [63]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/4/1542. A. F. J. Moffat, L. Drissen, R. Lamontagne, and C. Robert. ApJ, 334:1038, Nov

    doi

  55. [64]

    doi: 10.1086/166895. J. M. Moran. Rev. Mexicana Astron. Astrofis., 7:95–107, Aug

    doi

  56. [65]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa71b3. M. Moutzouri et al. A&A, 663:A80, July

    doi

  57. [66]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243098. K. Murase et al. ApJ, 874(1):80, Mar

    doi

  58. [67]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0422. R. P. Norris et al. PASA, 28(3):215–248, Aug

    doi

  59. [68]

    doi: 10.1071/AS11021. E. O’Gorman et al. A&A, 638:A65, June

    doi

  60. [69]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037756. S. Orlando et al. A&A, 622:A73, Feb

    doi

  61. [70]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834487. S. Orlando et al. A&A, 636:A22, Apr

    doi

  62. [71]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936718. S. Orlando et al. A&A, 645:A66, Jan

    doi

  63. [72]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039335. S. Orlando et al. A&A, 666:A2, Oct

    doi

  64. [73]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243258. S. Orlando et al. ApJ, 977(1):118, Dec

    doi

  65. [74]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad8ac8. S. Orlando et al. A&A, 696:A188, Apr

    doi

  66. [75]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202553902. N. Panagia and M. Felli. A&A, 39:1–5, Feb

    doi

  67. [76]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010774. C. S. Peri et al. A&A, 538:A108, Feb

    doi

  68. [77]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118116. C. S. Peri, P. Benaglia, and N. L. Isequilla. A&A, 578:A45, June

    doi

  69. [78]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/ 201424676. O. Petruk et al. MNRAS, 518(4):6377–6389, Feb

    doi

  70. [79]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3564. S. F. Portegies Zwart, S. L. W. McMillan, and M. Gieles. ARA&A, 48:431–493, Sept

    doi

  71. [80]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081309-130834. J. Puls, J. S. Vink, and F. Najarro. A&A Rev., 16(3-4):209–325, Dec

    doi

  72. [81]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346980. J. Sanchez-Bermudez et al. A&A, 624:A55, Apr

    doi

  73. [82]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834659. S. Scuderi et al. A&A, 332:251–267, Apr

    doi

  74. [83]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2015.17. S. J. Smartt, J. J. Eldridge, R. M. Crockett, and J. R. Maund. MNRAS, 395(3):1409–1437, May

    2015 doi

  75. [84]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14506.x. L. F. Smith, M. M. Shara, and A. F. J. Moffat. MNRAS, 281(1):163–191, July

    2009 doi

  76. [85]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/281.1.163. N. Smith. ARA&A, 52:487–528, Aug

    doi

  77. [86]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025. N.Smith. PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyofLondonSeriesA ,375(2105):20160268, 24 Evolved Massive Stars and Environment C. Buemi et al. Sept

    doi

  78. [87]

    doi: 10.1098/rsta.2016.0268. N. Smith and P. S. Conti. ApJ, 679(2):1467–1477, June

    2016 doi

  79. [88]

    doi: 10.1086/586885. M. Stoop et al. Nature, 634(8035):809–812, Oct. 2024a. doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-08013-8. M. Stoop et al. A&A, 681:A21, Jan. 2024b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347383. J. A. Toalá and S. J. Arthur. ApJ, 737(2):100, Aug

    doi

  80. [89]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/100. J. A. Toalá, M. A. Guerrero, G. Ramos-Larios, and V. Guzmán. A&A, 578:A66, June

    doi

  81. [90]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525706. A. Traficante et al. InAdvancing Astrophysics with the SKA – II (AASKAII)

    doi

  82. [91]

    G.Umanaetal

    doi: 10.1051/ 0004-6361:200500126. G.Umanaetal. MNRAS,386(3):1404–1410,May2008. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13044.x. G. Umana et al. ApJ, 718(2):1036–1045, Aug

    2008 doi

  83. [92]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/718/2/1036. G. Umana et al. ApJ, 739(1):L11, Sept

    doi

  84. [93]

    G.Umanaetal

    doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L11. G.Umanaetal. MNRAS,427(4):2975–2984,Dec.2012. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.22018.x. S. Ustamujic et al. A&A, 654:A167, Oct

    doi

  85. [94]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141569. J. van den Eijnden et al. MNRAS, 510(1):515–530, Feb. 2022a. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3395. J. van den Eijnden, P. Saikia, and S. Mohamed. MNRAS, 512(4):5374–5389, June 2022b. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac823. J. van den Eijnden et al. MNRAS, 532(3):2920...

    doi

  86. [95]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1622. J. van den Eijnden et al. MNRAS, 543(1):862–880, Oct

    doi

  87. [96]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1525. S. D. Van Dyk.Galaxies, 13(2):33, Apr

    doi

  88. [97]

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies13020033. A. J. van Marle, Z. Meliani, and A. Marcowith. A&A, 584:A49, Dec

    doi

  89. [98]

    doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2275-4_10. J. S. Vink. ARA&A, 60:203–246, Aug

    doi

  90. [99]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-094949. S. Wachter et al. AJ, 139(6):2330–2346, June

    doi

  91. [100]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2330. S. H. J. Wallström et al. A&A, 597:A99, Jan

    doi

  92. [101]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628416. K. Weis and D. J. Bomans.Galaxies, 8(1):20, Feb

    doi

  93. [102]

    R.M.T.WhiteandP.Tuthill

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies8010020. R.M.T.WhiteandP.Tuthill. In EncyclopediaofAstrophysics,Volume2 ,volume2,pages584–603, Jan

    doi

  94. [103]

    doi: 10.1016/B978-0-443-21439-4.00067-5. A. E. Wright and M. J. Barlow. MNRAS, 170:41–51, Jan

    doi

  95. [104]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/170.1.41. S. Zavala et al. MNRAS, 513(3):3317–3325, July

    doi

  96. [105]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1097. 25

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed June 25, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.