Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 53 references

A stroboscopic circle map built from ordinary geometric phases recovers the classical coupling function without needing isochrons.

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · grok-4.5

2026-07-12 12:09 UTC pith:G3FFEEF4

load-bearing objection Solid Floquet derivation that a stroboscopic map of a near-uniform generalized phase recovers classical Γ; useful inference extension of their prior work, limited to planar synthetics. the 2 major comments →

arxiv 2606.25892 v2 pith:G3FFEEF4 submitted 2026-06-24 nlin.AO

An Isochron-Free Framework for Phase Reduction and Coupling Inference

Akari Matsuki , Ryota Kobayashi , Hiroshi Kori This is my paper
classification nlin.AO
keywords phase reductionisochronsgeneralized phasecircle mapcoupling inferencelimit-cycle oscillatorsFloquet theorysynchronization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Classical phase reduction of weakly coupled oscillators needs the asymptotic phase defined by isochrons, which is hard to reconstruct from data. This paper shows that a much easier generalized phase—any smooth state function that advances nearly uniformly on the unperturbed cycle—still yields a closed description if one looks only at the one-period stroboscopic update. Under near-uniform rotation and sufficiently strong amplitude stability, that circle map is closed in the phase difference alone and its interaction term is exactly the same coupling function Γ that appears in ordinary phase reduction. The result supplies a practical route to coupling inference from ordinary polar angles or delay-coordinate phases, without ever computing isochrons, and is checked on synthetic van der Pol data.

Core claim

Under the two mild assumptions that a generalized phase rotates nearly uniformly on the unperturbed limit cycle and that amplitude deviations relax fast relative to weak coupling, the one-period stroboscopic map of that phase closes: the average advance over an interval of length 2π equals 1 plus ε times the classical phase-coupling function Γ of the phase difference, plus O(ε^{2}). The same Γ is recovered no matter which admissible generalized phase is chosen.

What carries the argument

The isochron-free circle map (Eq. 21): θ(t+π)-θ(t-π)/2π = 1 + ε Γ(θ(t)-θ'(t)) + O(ε^{2}). Floquet projection of the amplitude deviation followed by period averaging cancels amplitude contamination and isolates the classical Γ.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen phase must advance nearly uniformly along the unperturbed cycle; if its speed varies by order one, the period average no longer isolates the classical coupling function and the map need not close in phase difference alone.

What would settle it

On a pair of weakly coupled oscillators whose polar angle is strongly nonuniform on the limit cycle (large origin shift or strongly distorted orbit), check whether the least-squares Fourier fit of the one-period average advance still recovers the independently computed asymptotic-phase Γ; a systematic mismatch larger than O(ε) would refute the equality claim.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper develops an isochron-free phase-reduction framework for weakly coupled limit-cycle oscillators that uses a readily computable generalized phase (e.g., a polar angle) rather than the asymptotic phase defined by isochrons. Under two assumptions—near-uniform rotation of the generalized phase on the unperturbed cycle (Eqs. 41a–b) and sufficiently strong transverse amplitude stability—the authors derive, via Floquet theory and adiabatic elimination (Sec. 3), a closed one-period stroboscopic circle map whose interaction term coincides to leading order with the classical phase-coupling function Γ of asymptotic-phase reduction (Eq. 21). They then propose a Fourier least-squares coupling-inference method based on this map (Sec. 5) and validate it on synthetic data from coupled van der Pol oscillators, including polar-angle, origin-shifted, and delay-coordinate phases, with comparisons to continuous-time inference.

Significance. If the result holds under the stated hypotheses, the work usefully broadens the practical reach of phase reduction and coupling inference to settings where isochrons are hard to reconstruct. The Floquet-based derivation carefully tracks why period averaging isolates the same Γ as classical reduction, and the numerical checks (Stuart–Landau Fig. 2; van der Pol Figs. 3–5) support the leading-order claim and show graceful degradation under origin shifts and limit-cycle distortion. The extension of the authors’ prior asymptotic-phase inference method [21] to generalized phases is a concrete methodological contribution for data-driven oscillator networks. Strengths include an independent adjoint-method ground truth for Γ (Appendix B) and explicit robustness tests against the load-bearing near-uniform-rotation assumption.

major comments (2)
  1. Sec. 3.2, assumptions (41a–b): The equality of the stroboscopic coupling to classical Γ rests on Θ_ϕ(ϕ,0)=1+O(ε) and Θ_ϕ,ϕ(ϕ,0)=O(ε). This is load-bearing for Eq. (21) and for the claim that the inferred coupling is phase-choice independent. The origin-shift and large-μ tests (Figs. 4–5) probe degradation, but the manuscript should state more explicitly how a practitioner can diagnose near-uniform rotation from data (e.g., a quantitative bound on period variation of dθ/dt on the unperturbed cycle) and when the O(ε) requirement fails at leading order.
  2. Sec. 5.3, Eq. (70) and concluding claims on one-dimensional observables: The theory requires a generalized phase Θ that is a smooth function of the instantaneous state. The delay-coordinate construction is explicitly outside that class, yet the abstract, Sec. 2.4, and Sec. 6 present one-dimensional reconstruction as within the framework’s applicability. The numerical success is valuable, but the manuscript should separate proved results from empirical evidence and qualify the one-dimensional claim accordingly.
minor comments (6)
  1. Throughout: several typos and wording issues (e.g., “readily comptable,” “furhter,” “purturbed,” “contiuous,” “natrual,” “Striclty,” “W eak heterogeneity”). A careful copy-edit is needed.
  2. Sec. 5.1–5.3: Forcing a0=0 and absorbing any constant into the estimated natural frequency is a practical identifiability choice; it should be stated more prominently as a modeling assumption with its consequences for absolute frequency inference.
  3. Sec. 3: The derivation is written for planar systems with a single stable Floquet mode; a short remark on how multiple stable modes (higher-dimensional oscillators) enter the adiabatic elimination would help readers apply the result beyond 2D.
  4. Fig. 3 caption and related text: sampling every other half-period (n=1,3,5,…) for the circle-map scatter is fine but should be justified briefly so that readers do not confuse it with loss of information.
  5. Reproducibility: no code or data repository is mentioned. Providing scripts for the van der Pol inference and adjoint Γ computation would strengthen the contribution.
  6. References: a few duplicate or near-duplicate entries appear (e.g., Kuramoto 1984 listed twice; Chavez et al. 2006 twice). Clean the bibliography.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

No load-bearing circularity; the stroboscopic map derivation is self-contained Floquet analysis under explicit assumptions, with only a minor non-load-bearing self-citation to the authors' prior asymptotic-phase inference method.

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Introduction, final paragraph; also Sec. 6]
    "This work extends a previous study [21], which established the inference method for asymptotic phases, to a broader class of generalized phases."

    Citation [21] is by the same author set and supplies the prior circle-map inference procedure for asymptotic phases. It is not used inside the Floquet derivation of Eq. 21, nor does it supply a uniqueness theorem or ansatz that forces the present result; the extension is therefore non-load-bearing. Flagged only for completeness as a minor self-reference.

full rationale

The central claim (Eq. 21) is obtained in Sec. 3 by expanding the generalized-phase velocity in Floquet coordinates (35–39), imposing the near-uniform-rotation conditions (41a–b), performing the O(ε) expansion of dθ/dt (42–46), and showing that the amplitude terms cancel by integration by parts over one period, leaving exactly the classical Γ of (12). All steps are internal, use only standard Floquet theory (Appendix A), and do not define Γ from the data or from the generalized phase itself. Ground-truth Γ used for validation is computed independently via the adjoint method on the unperturbed cycle (Appendix B). The inference procedure of Sec. 5 simply least-squares fits Fourier coefficients of the circle map to observed stroboscopic increments and compares them to that independent Γ; the fit is not re-labeled as a first-principles prediction of a forced quantity. The sole self-citation ([21]) is an explicit extension statement (“this work extends a previous study [21] o generalized phases”) and is not invoked to justify any uniqueness, ansatz, or algebraic step of the present derivation. The modeling choice a0 = 0 (constant coupling absorbed into frequency) is standard and openly declared; it does not create a definitional loop. Consequently the derivation chain does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

4 free parameters · 5 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard Floquet/phase-reduction machinery plus two paper-specific regularity assumptions on the generalized phase and amplitude damping, plus a practical normalization (a0=0) used only in the inference section. No new physical entities are postulated; ‘generalized phase’ is a definitional class of state functions. Free parameters are ordinary numerical choices (Fourier cutoff, delay, simulation length) rather than constants fitted to force the theory.

free parameters (4)
  • Fourier cutoff K = 5 (main experiments)
    Number of harmonics retained in the least-squares expansion of Γ (Eq. 58); set to K=5 in main figures. Appendix C shows robustness for the circle-map method, but K remains a user choice that affects the continuous-time baseline.
  • Delay d for one-dimensional phase reconstruction = π/2
    Chosen as a quarter period (d=π/2) for delay-coordinate polar angle (Eq. 70); not derived from the theory.
  • Coupling/heterogeneity scale ε and oscillator parameters (μ, c_i, τ_i) = e.g. ε~0.005, μ∈[0.05,0.5], τ2=1.02
    Simulation parameters that place the system in the weak-coupling asynchronous regime; not free parameters of the theory but control the numerical tests.
  • Constant term a0 of Γ forced to zero = 0
    Sec. 5.3 states that natural period and constant coupling cannot be separated from one bivariate time series, so a0 is set to 0 and absorbed into the estimated natural frequency. This is a modeling choice that affects inferred absolute frequency but not the shape of Γ.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption Limit cycle is hyperbolic with one neutral Floquet direction and remaining exponents with negative real parts; transverse stability λ=O(1).
    Used throughout Sec. 3 and Appendix A to justify amplitude adiabatic elimination and the expansion z=ψ S v0 + a S v1.
  • domain assumption Coupling and heterogeneity are weak: O(ε) with 0<ε≪1, so phase drift is slow compared with O(1) amplitude relaxation.
    Standard weak-coupling premise of phase reduction; stated in Sec. 2.1 and used to drop O(ε²) remainders in the stroboscopic map.
  • ad hoc to paper On the unperturbed cycle the generalized phase satisfies Θ_ϕ(ϕ,0)=1+O(ε) and Θ_ϕ,ϕ(ϕ,0)=O(ε) (near-uniform rotation).
    Assumptions (41a–b) in Sec. 3.2; essential for period-averaging to recover classical Γ and for phase-difference closure. Not automatic for arbitrary state functions.
  • standard math Floquet theory for T-periodic linearization about a stable limit cycle (fundamental matrix S(t), biorthogonal left/right eigenvectors).
    Appendix A; standard background used to project phase and amplitude modes.
  • domain assumption Classical asymptotic-phase reduction and the integral formula for Γ (Eq. 12) hold for the reference oscillator.
    Sec. 2.2; the paper’s claim is that the generalized-phase circle map matches this known object, not that it re-derives phase reduction from scratch.
invented entities (1)
  • Generalized phase Θ(X) independent evidence
    purpose: Names the class of smooth state-dependent phase-like coordinates (polar angle, etc.) that replace isochronal asymptotic phase in the analysis and inference method.
    Definitional construct rather than a new physical object; independent evidence is not required beyond computability from trajectories. Included for completeness because the paper’s framing centers on this class.

pith-pipeline@v1.1.0-grok45 · 22607 in / 3853 out tokens · 43767 ms · 2026-07-12T12:09:06.419341+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

Phase description provides a compact and powerful framework for analyzing synchronization dynamics in weakly coupled limit-cycle oscillators. While its classical formulation relies on the asymptotic phase defined by isochrons, reconstructing isochrons from observed trajectories is often challenging for complex models and real-world systems. Here we develop an isochron-free framework based on a readily computable generalized phase, such as the polar angle computed from observed trajectories. We theoretically show that, under near-uniform rotation of the generalized phase and sufficiently stable amplitude dynamics, a one-period stroboscopic description yields a closed circle map. The interaction term of the resulting circle map coincides, to leading order, with the phase coupling function obtained from the conventional phase reduction. Based on this circle map, we propose a method to infer coupling from oscillatory time series. The method is validated using synthetic data from van der Pol oscillators. Our framework broadens the applicability of phase reduction and provides a theoretically grounded method for coupling inference from oscillatory data.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.25892 by Akari Matsuki, Hiroshi Kori, Ryota Kobayashi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Asymptotic phase and (b) polar angle as an example of generalized phase. The solid and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (a) Asymptotic phase and (b) polar angle as an example of generalized phase. The solid and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The circle map describes the dynamics of the generalized phase more accurately than the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An example of coupling inference from the van der Pol oscillators. (a) Inference based on the contin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: An example of coupling inference from the van der Pol oscillators. (a) Inference based on the circle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The circle-map-based inference is robust against various choices of the phase. (a) The polar angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The circle-map-based inference is robust against various choices of the phase. (a) The polar angle [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The circle-map-based inference is robust against noncircular limit cycles. (a) The limit cycles with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The circle-map-based inference is robust against noncircular limit cycles. (a) The limit cycles [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The circle-map-based inference is robust with respect to the cutoff frequency. The coefficient of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The circle-map-based inference is robust with respect to the cutoff frequency. The error (69) of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984

    Yoshiki Kuramoto.Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1984

    1984

  2. [2]

    Winfree.The Geometry of Biological Time

    Arthur T. Winfree.The Geometry of Biological Time. Springer, New York, 2 edition, 2001. 19 Figure 6: The circle-map-based inference is robust with respect to the cutoff frequency. The error (69) of the coupling inference (a) by the continuous-model-based method and (b) by the circle-map-based method are plotted as a function ofK

    2001

  3. [3]

    Phase-reduction approach to synchronization of spatiotemporal rhythms in reaction-diffusion systems.Physical Review X, 4:021032, 2014

    Hiroya Nakao, Tatsuo Yanagita, and Yoji Kawamura. Phase-reduction approach to synchronization of spatiotemporal rhythms in reaction-diffusion systems.Physical Review X, 4:021032, 2014

    2014

  4. [4]

    Isochrons and phaseless sets.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 1(3):259–273, 1975

    John Guckenheimer. Isochrons and phaseless sets.Journal of Mathematical Biology, 1(3):259–273, 1975

    1975

  5. [5]

    Schwemmer and Timothy J

    Michael A. Schwemmer and Timothy J. Lewis. The theory of weakly coupled oscillators. In Nathan W. Schultheiss, Astrid A. Prinz, and Robert J. Butera, editors,Phase Response Curves in Neuroscience: Theory, Experiment, and Analysis, pages 3–31. Springer, 2012

    2012

  6. [6]

    Springer, Berlin, 1984

    Yoshiki Kuramoto.Chemical Oscillations, Waves and Turbulence. Springer, Berlin, 1984

    1984

  7. [7]

    Springer Science & Business Media, 1997

    Frank C Hoppensteadt and Eugene M Izhikevich.Weakly connected neural networks. Springer Science & Business Media, 1997

    1997

  8. [8]

    Estimat- ing asymptotic phase and amplitude functions of limit-cycle oscillators from time series data.Physical Review E, 106(1):014204, 2022

    Norihisa Namura, Shohei Takata, Katsunori Yamaguchi, Ryota Kobayashi, and Hiroya Nakao. Estimat- ing asymptotic phase and amplitude functions of limit-cycle oscillators from time series data.Physical Review E, 106(1):014204, 2022

    2022

  9. [9]

    Phase autoencoder for limit-cycle oscillators.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 34(6), 2024

    Koichiro Yawata, Kai Fukami, Kunihiko Taira, and Hiroya Nakao. Phase autoencoder for limit-cycle oscillators.Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 34(6), 2024

    2024

  10. [10]

    Gaussian process phase interpolation for estimating the asymptotic phase of a limit cycle oscillator from time series data.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 191:115913, 2025

    Taichi Yamamoto, Hiroya Nakao, and Ryota Kobayashi. Gaussian process phase interpolation for estimating the asymptotic phase of a limit cycle oscillator from time series data.Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, 191:115913, 2025

    2025

  11. [11]

    Data-driven inference of hopf normal form representations from oscillatory time series.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.26847, 2026

    Shinsuke Koyama and Ryota Kobayashi. Data-driven inference of hopf normal form representations from oscillatory time series.arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.26847, 2026

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    Packard, James P

    Norman H. Packard, James P. Crutchfield, J. Doyne Farmer, and Robert S. Shaw. Geometry from a time series.Physical Review Letters, 45(9):712–716, 1980

    1980

  13. [13]

    Detecting strange attractors in turbulence

    Floris Takens. Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. InDynamical Systems and Turbulence, Warwick 1980, pages 366–381. Springer, 1981

    1980

  14. [14]

    Rosenblum, Arkady S Pikovsky, and J¨ urgen Kurths

    Michael G. Rosenblum, Arkady S Pikovsky, and J¨ urgen Kurths. Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators.Physical Review Letters, 76(11):1804, 1996. 20

    1996

  15. [15]

    Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series

    Arkady Pikovsky, Michael Rosenblum, and J¨ urgen Kurths.Synchronization: A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences. Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series. Cambridge University Press, 2001

    2001

  16. [16]

    Asymptotic wavelet and gabor analysis: Extraction of instan- taneous frequencies.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38(2):644–664, 1992

    Nathalie Delprat, Bernard Escudi´ e, Philippe Guillemain, Richard Kronland-Martinet, Philippe Tchamitchian, and Bruno Torresani. Asymptotic wavelet and gabor analysis: Extraction of instan- taneous frequencies.IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 38(2):644–664, 1992

    1992

  17. [17]

    On an ambiguity in the definition of the amplitude and phase of a signal.Signal Processing, 79(3):301–307, 1999

    Leon Cohen, Patrick Loughlin, and David Vakman. On an ambiguity in the definition of the amplitude and phase of a signal.Signal Processing, 79(3):301–307, 1999

    1999

  18. [18]

    Towards a proper estimation of phase synchronization from time series.Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 154(1-2):149–160, 2006

    M Chavez, Michel Besserve, C Adam, and Jacques Martinerie. Towards a proper estimation of phase synchronization from time series.Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 154(1-2):149–160, 2006

    2006

  19. [19]

    Recent advances in coupled oscillator theory

    Bard Ermentrout, Youngmin Park, and Dan Wilson. Recent advances in coupled oscillator theory. 2020

    2020

  20. [20]

    Weakly coupled oscillators in a slowly varying world.Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 40(3):269–281, 2016

    Youngmin Park and Bard Ermentrout. Weakly coupled oscillators in a slowly varying world.Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 40(3):269–281, 2016

    2016

  21. [21]

    Network inference applicable to both synchronous and desynchronous systems from oscillatory signals.PLOS Complex Systems, 2(9):e0000063, 2025

    Akari Matsuki, Hiroshi Kori, and Ryota Kobayashi. Network inference applicable to both synchronous and desynchronous systems from oscillatory signals.PLOS Complex Systems, 2(9):e0000063, 2025

    2025

  22. [22]

    Winfree.The geometry of biological time, volume 12

    Arthur T. Winfree.The geometry of biological time, volume 12. Springer Science & Business Media, 2001

    2001

  23. [23]

    Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators.Contemporary Physics, 57(2):188–214, 2016

    Hiroya Nakao. Phase reduction approach to synchronisation of nonlinear oscillators.Contemporary Physics, 57(2):188–214, 2016

    2016

  24. [24]

    Tokuda, Zoran Levnajic, and Kazuyoshi Ishimura

    Isao T. Tokuda, Zoran Levnajic, and Kazuyoshi Ishimura. A practical method for estimating cou- pling functions in complex dynamical systems.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 377(2160):20190015, 2019

    2019

  25. [25]

    Interaction mechanisms quantified from dynamical features of frog choruses.Royal Society Open Science, 7(3):191693, 2020

    Kaiichiro Ota, Ikkyu Aihara, and Toshio Aoyagi. Interaction mechanisms quantified from dynamical features of frog choruses.Royal Society Open Science, 7(3):191693, 2020

    2020

  26. [26]

    Recovering sparse networks: Basis adaptation and stability under extensions.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 424:132895, 2021

    Marcel Novaes, Edmilson Roque dos Santos, and Tiago Pereira. Recovering sparse networks: Basis adaptation and stability under extensions.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 424:132895, 2021

    2021

  27. [27]

    Towards a proper estimation of phase synchronization from time series.Journal of Neuroscience methods, 154(1-2):149–160, 2006

    M Chavez, Michel Besserve, C Adam, and Jacques Martinerie. Towards a proper estimation of phase synchronization from time series.Journal of Neuroscience methods, 154(1-2):149–160, 2006

    2006

  28. [28]

    Phase demodulation with iterative Hilbert transform embeddings

    Erik Gengel and Arkady Pikovsky. Phase demodulation with iterative Hilbert transform embeddings. Signal Processing, 165:115–127, 2019

    2019

  29. [29]

    Phase reconstruction from oscillatory data with iterated Hilbert transform embeddings—benefits and limitations.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 429:133070, 2022

    Erik Gengel and Arkady Pikovsky. Phase reconstruction from oscillatory data with iterated Hilbert transform embeddings—benefits and limitations.Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 429:133070, 2022

    2022

  30. [30]

    An extended hilbert transform method for recon- structing the phase from an oscillatory signal.Scientific Reports, 13(1):3535, 2023

    Akari Matsuki, Hiroshi Kori, and Ryota Kobayashi. An extended hilbert transform method for recon- structing the phase from an oscillatory signal.Scientific Reports, 13(1):3535, 2023

    2023

  31. [31]

    Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics

    Federico Battiston, Giulia Cencetti, Iacopo Iacopini, Vito Latora, Maxime Lucas, Alice Patania, Jean- Gabriel Young, and Giovanni Petri. Networks beyond pairwise interactions: Structure and dynamics. Physics reports, 874:1–92, 2020

    2020

  32. [32]

    What are higher-order networks?SIAM review, 65(3):686–731, 2023

    Christian Bick, Elizabeth Gross, Heather A Harrington, and Michael T Schaub. What are higher-order networks?SIAM review, 65(3):686–731, 2023

    2023

  33. [33]

    The structure and dynamics of networks with higher order interactions.Physics Reports, 1018:1–64, 2023

    Stefano Boccaletti, Pietro De Lellis, CI Del Genio, Karin Alfaro-Bittner, Regino Criado, Sarika Jalan, and Miguel Romance. The structure and dynamics of networks with higher order interactions.Physics Reports, 1018:1–64, 2023

    2023

  34. [34]

    Reconstructing effective phase connec- tivity of oscillator networks from observations.New Journal of Physics, 16(8):085013, 2014

    Bj¨ orn Kralemann, Arkady Pikovsky, and Michael Rosenblum. Reconstructing effective phase connec- tivity of oscillator networks from observations.New Journal of Physics, 16(8):085013, 2014. 21

    2014

  35. [35]

    Coupling functions in networks of oscillators.New Journal of Physics, 17(3):035002, 2015

    Tomislav Stankovski, Valentina Ticcinelli, Peter VE McClintock, and Aneta Stefanovska. Coupling functions in networks of oscillators.New Journal of Physics, 17(3):035002, 2015

    2015

  36. [36]

    Model-free inference of direct network interactions from nonlinear collective dynamics.Nature communications, 8(1):2192, 2017

    Jose Casadiego, Mor Nitzan, Sarah Hallerberg, and Marc Timme. Model-free inference of direct network interactions from nonlinear collective dynamics.Nature communications, 8(1):2192, 2017

    2017

  37. [37]

    Non-pairwise interaction in oscillatory ensembles: from theory to data analysis

    Arkady Pikovsky and Michael Rosenblum. Non-pairwise interaction in oscillatory ensembles: from theory to data analysis. InHigher-order systems, pages 181–195. Springer, 2022

    2022

  38. [38]

    Inferring connectivity of an oscillatory network via the phase dynamics reconstruction.Frontiers in network physiology, 3:1298228, 2023

    Michael Rosenblum and Arkady Pikovsky. Inferring connectivity of an oscillatory network via the phase dynamics reconstruction.Frontiers in network physiology, 3:1298228, 2023

    2023

  39. [39]

    Learning the effective order of a hypergraph dynamical system.Science Advances, 10(19):eadh4053, 2024

    Leonie Neuh¨ auser, Michael Scholkemper, Francesco Tudisco, and Michael T Schaub. Learning the effective order of a hypergraph dynamical system.Science Advances, 10(19):eadh4053, 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    Reconstructing higher-order interactions in coupled dynamical systems.Nature Com- munications, 15(1):5184, 2024

    Federico Malizia, Alessandra Corso, Lucia Valentina Gambuzza, Giovanni Russo, Vito Latora, and Mattia Frasca. Reconstructing higher-order interactions in coupled dynamical systems.Nature Com- munications, 15(1):5184, 2024

    2024

  41. [41]

    Hypergraph reconstruction from dynamics.Nature Communications, 16(1):2691, 2025

    Robin Delabays, Giulia De Pasquale, Florian D¨ orfler, and Yuanzhao Zhang. Hypergraph reconstruction from dynamics.Nature Communications, 16(1):2691, 2025

    2025

  42. [42]

    Distinguishing pairwise and higher-order interactions in coupled oscillators from time series.Communications Physics, 2025

    Weiwei Su, Shigefumi Hata, Hiroshi Kori, Hiroya Nakao, and Ryota Kobayashi. Distinguishing pairwise and higher-order interactions in coupled oscillators from time series.Communications Physics, 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Fumito Mori and Hiroshi Kori. Noninvasive inference methods for interaction and noise intensities of coupled oscillators using only spike time data.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(6):e2113620119, 2022

    2022

  44. [44]

    Rosenblum and Arkady S Pikovsky

    Michael G. Rosenblum and Arkady S Pikovsky. Detecting direction of coupling in interacting oscillators. Physical Review E, 64(4):045202, 2001

    2001

  45. [45]

    Tokuda, Swati Jain, Istv´ an Z

    Isao T. Tokuda, Swati Jain, Istv´ an Z. Kiss, and John L. Hudson. Inferring phase equations from multivariate time series.Physical Review Letters, 99(6):064101, 2007

    2007

  46. [46]

    Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis.Human Brain Mapping, 2(1-2):56–78, 1994

    Karl J Friston. Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis.Human Brain Mapping, 2(1-2):56–78, 1994

    1994

  47. [47]

    A closer look at the apparent correlation of structural and functional connectivity in excitable neural networks.Scientific reports, 5(1):7870, 2015

    Arnaud Mess´ e, Marc-Thorsten H¨ utt, Peter K¨ onig, and Claus C Hilgetag. A closer look at the apparent correlation of structural and functional connectivity in excitable neural networks.Scientific reports, 5(1):7870, 2015

    2015

  48. [48]

    A call for more clarity around causality in neuroscience.Trends in neurosciences, 45(9):654–655, 2022

    David L Barack, Earl K Miller, Christopher I Moore, Adam M Packer, Luiz Pessoa, Lauren N Ross, and Nicole C Rust. A call for more clarity around causality in neuroscience.Trends in neurosciences, 45(9):654–655, 2022

    2022

  49. [49]

    Inference of monosynaptic connections from parallel spike trains: A review.Neuroscience Research, 215:37–46, 2025

    Ryota Kobayashi and Shigeru Shinomoto. Inference of monosynaptic connections from parallel spike trains: A review.Neuroscience Research, 215:37–46, 2025

    2025

  50. [50]

    Gaba-mediated repulsive coupling between circadian clock neurons in the scn encodes seasonal time

    Jihwan Myung, Sungho Hong, Daniel DeWoskin, Erik De Schutter, Daniel B Forger, and Toru Takumi. Gaba-mediated repulsive coupling between circadian clock neurons in the scn encodes seasonal time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29):E3920–E3929, 2015

    2015

  51. [51]

    Estimation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductance variations in motoneurons during locomotor-like rhythmic activity.Neuroscience, 335:72–81, 2016

    Ryota Kobayashi, Hiroshi Nishimaru, and Hisao Nishijo. Estimation of excitatory and inhibitory synaptic conductance variations in motoneurons during locomotor-like rhythmic activity.Neuroscience, 335:72–81, 2016

    2016

  52. [52]

    Type i membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony.Neural computation, 8(5):979–1001, 1996

    Bard Ermentrout. Type i membranes, phase resetting curves, and synchrony.Neural computation, 8(5):979–1001, 1996

    1996

  53. [53]

    Springer, 2010

    Bard Ermentrout and David M Terman.Mathematical foundations of neuroscience, volume 35. Springer, 2010. 22

    2010