pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26501 · v1 · pith:OKYSRKTEnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Ductility Design Rules for Tungsten based Refractory High Entropy Alloys from Sparse Experimental Datasets

Avik Mahata , Nick Beaver This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 04:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords refractory high-entropy alloystungsten alloysductility predictionmachine learningsupport vector classifierfusion materialsSHAP analysisalloy design
0
0 comments X

The pith

Machine learning on sparse data predicts moderate Ti, Ni, and Co additions improve room-temperature ductility in tungsten refractory high-entropy alloys while high Cr promotes brittleness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper assembles a curated set of experimental mechanical properties for tungsten-containing alloys and builds physics-informed composition descriptors to train machine learning classifiers for ductile versus brittle behavior. Nested cross-validation identifies the support vector classifier as the best performer on this limited dataset, and Shapley explanations rank the exchange-correlation parameter, valence electron concentration, pressure field, and electronegativity mismatch as the dominant influences. Synthetic compositions mapped on pseudo-ternary diagrams show that moderate Ti, Ni, and Co raise the probability of room-temperature ductility while elevated Cr lowers it, with these trends matching prior experimental reports on solid-solution strengthening and Cr-induced embrittlement. The resulting interpretable framework supports screening of candidate alloys for fusion environments even though the underlying mechanical-property records remain sparse and heterogeneous.

Core claim

A support vector classifier trained on physics-informed descriptors from a sparse experimental dataset of tungsten-based refractory high-entropy alloys predicts that moderate additions of Ti, Ni, and Co increase the likelihood of room-temperature ductility whereas high Cr contents promote brittle behavior, with the predictions aligning with published experiments and with DFT-derived elastic descriptors.

What carries the argument

Support vector classifier with Shapley additive explanations applied to composition-based physics-informed descriptors such as valence electron concentration and electronegativity mismatch.

If this is right

  • Moderate Ti additions are expected to improve ductility via solid-solution and electronic effects.
  • High Cr contents should be minimized to reduce the risk of room-temperature brittleness.
  • The model supplies an interpretable screening step that narrows the space of compositions for subsequent DFT calculations and targeted experiments.
  • Agreement between the classifier margins and independent DFT elastic descriptors reinforces the physical grounding of the learned boundary.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Compositions containing balanced moderate levels of Ti, Ni, and Co with low Cr could be prioritized for experimental synthesis and mechanical testing.
  • The same descriptor-plus-classifier workflow could be reused on other refractory alloy families once comparable sparse datasets are assembled.
  • Collecting additional uniform mechanical-property measurements on borderline compositions would directly test and potentially tighten the current decision boundary.

Load-bearing premise

The sparse and heterogeneous experimental mechanical-property dataset is representative enough for the trained classifier to produce generalizable predictions for new compositions.

What would settle it

Synthesize and mechanically test at room temperature a new tungsten-based composition inside the convex hull of the training data that the model classifies as ductile, such as one with moderate Ti and low Cr, and check whether it exhibits the predicted ductility.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26501 by Avik Mahata, Nick Beaver.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: (referred to as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) matrix of the computed compositional descriptors. The correlation coefficient between each pair of features is shown with a heatmap where red represents positive correlations, blue represents negative correlations, and soft/white colors represent a lack of correlation.Highly correlated features were pruned prior to model training. The Young’s modulus, geometric strain,… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Aggregated confusion matrices from outer folds of validation. In each matrix, clockwise from the top left square, the true negatives, false positives, false negatives, and true positives are shown. Each model’s counts for these metrics are counted across all validation folds. Sensitivity analysis ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Special quasirandom structure (SQS) supercells used for first-principles calculations of the selected validation alloys. Each structure was generated using ICET from a bcc parent lattice and populated with the target elemen￾tal concentrations to reproduce the correlation functions of an ideal random solid solution. Different colors denote distinct chemical species. The displayed configurations correspond t… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) summary of each feature’s contribution to the support vector ma￾chine’s output. Right: SHAP summary (beeswarm) plot, where point colors indicate low (blue) to high (red) fea￾ture values and position along the x-axis represents each feature’s impact on the model output. Left: mean absolute SHAP value per feature, ranking overall feature importance. The SHAP analysis reve… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Dependence of Shapley additive explanations values on the four most influential features, illustrating how valence electron concentration, exchange correlation parameter, and pressure field promote ductile classifications while higher electronegativity mismatch favors brittle behavior. The sign of the Shapley additive explanations values is indicative of the direction of influence on model decision, with a… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: SVC decision function visualized across pseudo-ternary composition spaces for common alloying combina￾tions in W-based RHEAs. Each point represents an interpolated synthetic composition colored by the signed decision value, where positive values in red indicate a ductile classification and negative values in blue correspond to brittle predictions. Additionally, points that are classified as ductile are rep… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Element-wise dependence of the SVC decision function on composition for selected alloying elements. Syn￾thetic compositions were binned by atomic fraction, and the points show the mean value of the decision function within each bin, with error bars indicating one standard deviation. The horizontal dashed line marks the learned boundary between ductile (positive) and brittle (negative) predictions. 3.3. Int… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Density functional theory elastic validation of the machine learning selected refractory high entropy alloys. (a) Bulk modulus (B). (b) Shear modulus (G). (c) Young’s modulus (E). (d) Poisson’s ratio (ν). (e) Pugh ratio (B/G). (f) Universal elastic anisotropy index (A U ). The dashed lines in panels (d) and (e) indicate the commonly accepted ductility thresholds of ν = 0.26 and B/G = 1.75, respectively. Th… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Density functional theory derived hardness and dislocation energetics of the machine learning selected re￾fractory high entropy alloys. (a) Bulk modulus (B), shear modulus (G), Young’s modulus (E), and estimated Vickers hardness (HV ). (b) Screw (Ks) and edge (Ke) dislocation energy factors derived from the elastic stiffness tensor. (c) Orientation dependent mixed dislocation energy factor (Km). Lower val… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Density functional theory calculated electronic density of states (DOS) for the machine-learning-selected re￾fractory high-entropy alloys. (a) Total DOS over the full energy range for all investigated compositions. (b) Enlarged view of the DOS near the Fermi level (EF), where the vertical dashed line indicates the Fermi energy. (c) Atom￾projected DOS of MoNbTaWTiHfZr. (d) Atom-projected DOS of MoWReRu. (e… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: DFT-derived Poisson’s ratio (ν) plotted against the Pugh ratio (B/G) for the six alloys selected for first￾principles validation. Data points are colored according to the SVC decision-function margin, where positive values indicate increasing confidence in the ductile class and negative values indicate increasing confidence in the brittle class. The dashed vertical line denotes the commonly used ductility… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Tungsten-based refractory high-entropy alloys (RHEAs) are promising materials for fusion applications but often remain brittle at room temperature because of tungsten's high ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT). To identify alloying strategies that improve ductility, we compiled a curated dataset of experimentally reported tungsten-containing alloys and developed composition-based, physics-informed descriptors for machine learning. Three classifiers were evaluated using nested cross-validation, and a support vector classifier (SVC) showed the best generalization for this sparse dataset. Shapley additive explanations identified the exchange-correlation parameter, valence electron concentration, pressure field, and electronegativity mismatch as the most influential features governing ductile-brittle behavior. Synthetic compositions generated within the convex interpolation domain of the training data were evaluated and visualized on pseudo-ternary diagrams to map predicted ductility trends. The model predicts that moderate additions of Ti, Ni, and Co increase the likelihood of room-temperature ductility, whereas high Cr contents promote brittle behavior. These predictions agree with published experimental observations, including Ti-assisted ductility through solid-solution and electronic effects and embrittlement in Cr-rich refractory alloys. Agreement between DFT-derived elastic descriptors and SVC decision-function margins further supports the physical relevance of the learned classification boundary. Although the available mechanical dataset remains limited and heterogeneous, the model captures experimentally consistent trends and provides an interpretable, physics-informed framework for screening tungsten-based RHEAs for targeted simulation and experimental validation in fusion environments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper compiles a curated but sparse and heterogeneous experimental dataset of tungsten-containing alloys, develops physics-informed composition-based descriptors, evaluates three classifiers via nested cross-validation (selecting SVC as best), applies SHAP to rank features (exchange-correlation parameter, valence electron concentration, pressure field, electronegativity mismatch), generates synthetic compositions inside the training convex hull, and maps predicted ductility on pseudo-ternary diagrams. It claims the model identifies trends (moderate Ti/Ni/Co additions favor room-temperature ductility; high Cr favors brittleness) that agree with selected experimental literature and that DFT elastic descriptors are consistent with the SVC decision boundary, thereby offering an interpretable screening framework for fusion-relevant RHEAs despite acknowledged data limitations.

Significance. If the identified trends prove robust and generalizable beyond the training distribution, the work would supply a practical, physics-informed tool for prioritizing alloy compositions in refractory high-entropy alloy design, potentially reducing the experimental search space for ductile tungsten-based materials. Positive elements include the explicit use of nested CV to mitigate overfitting on small data, SHAP-based interpretability, restriction of synthetic points to the convex hull, and cross-check against DFT-derived quantities. These choices strengthen the claim that the learned boundary reflects physical mechanisms rather than pure statistical artifact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and model evaluation section] Abstract and § on model evaluation: the central claim that the SVC 'captures experimentally consistent trends' and 'agrees with published experimental observations' is load-bearing for the paper's utility as a screening tool, yet no quantitative metrics (confusion matrix, precision-recall, or per-composition match rate from nested CV) or explicit list of compared literature compositions are supplied; without these, the strength of the agreement cannot be assessed against label noise arising from heterogeneous DBTT definitions and test conditions.
  2. [Dataset curation and synthetic compositions section] § on dataset and synthetic compositions: the premise that the curated experimental labels are representative enough for extrapolatable predictions rests on an unquantified curation process (no reported exclusion criteria, final sample size after filtering, or sensitivity to label flips); because all synthetic points lie inside the convex hull, any apparent agreement with external experiments may reflect interpolation of existing patterns rather than discovery of transferable rules, directly affecting the generalizability asserted in the final paragraph.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Methods] The description of SVC hyperparameter optimization would benefit from an explicit table listing the final kernel, C, and gamma values together with their effect on the ranked SHAP features.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made to improve clarity and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and model evaluation section] Abstract and § on model evaluation: the central claim that the SVC 'captures experimentally consistent trends' and 'agrees with published experimental observations' is load-bearing for the paper's utility as a screening tool, yet no quantitative metrics (confusion matrix, precision-recall, or per-composition match rate from nested CV) or explicit list of compared literature compositions are supplied; without these, the strength of the agreement cannot be assessed against label noise arising from heterogeneous DBTT definitions and test conditions.

    Authors: We agree that explicit quantitative metrics would allow readers to better evaluate the claimed agreement. In the revised manuscript we will add a table summarizing nested CV performance (accuracy, precision, recall, F1, and averaged confusion matrix from the outer loop). We will also include a supplementary table listing the specific literature compositions used for qualitative comparison, together with the reported DBTT conditions and measurement methods. These additions will make the strength of the experimental agreement assessable while acknowledging the label heterogeneity already noted in the text. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Dataset curation and synthetic compositions section] § on dataset and synthetic compositions: the premise that the curated experimental labels are representative enough for extrapolatable predictions rests on an unquantified curation process (no reported exclusion criteria, final sample size after filtering, or sensitivity to label flips); because all synthetic points lie inside the convex hull, any apparent agreement with external experiments may reflect interpolation of existing patterns rather than discovery of transferable rules, directly affecting the generalizability asserted in the final paragraph.

    Authors: We will revise the dataset section to state the exclusion criteria (peer-reviewed sources with reported room-temperature ductility or DBTT, removal of duplicates and incomplete entries) and the final curated sample size. A supplementary robustness check under small random label flips will also be added. On the synthetic points, we accept that generation is restricted to the convex hull and therefore constitutes interpolation; the revised text will explicitly frame the pseudo-ternary maps as a tool for exploring trends inside the spanned composition space rather than claiming broad extrapolation. This clarification aligns with the paper’s existing statement on data limitations and does not alter the utility for guiding experiments within or near the training domain. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; standard supervised ML on external experimental labels with physics features

full rationale

The derivation proceeds by curating an external experimental dataset of tungsten alloys, computing standard physics-informed descriptors (exchange-correlation, valence electron concentration, etc.), training an SVC via nested cross-validation, applying SHAP, and generating predictions on synthetic compositions inside the training convex hull. These predictions are then compared to independent published experiments. No step reduces by construction to its inputs: the target labels are external, features are not defined from ductility, and no self-citation chain or ansatz smuggling is present. The noted limitation (sparse heterogeneous data) is a generalizability issue, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard machine-learning assumptions plus the domain premise that the chosen physics descriptors are sufficient; no new particles or forces are postulated and no free parameters are fitted beyond ordinary classifier hyperparameters.

free parameters (1)
  • SVC hyperparameters and kernel choice
    Tuned inside nested cross-validation on the sparse data set; values not reported in abstract.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The selected composition-based descriptors (exchange-correlation parameter, valence electron concentration, pressure field, electronegativity mismatch) capture the dominant physical drivers of ductile-brittle behavior
    Invoked when the authors state that SHAP identified these features as most influential and that agreement with DFT elastic descriptors supports physical relevance.
  • domain assumption Nested cross-validation on a small heterogeneous data set yields reliable estimates of generalization performance
    Stated as the evaluation procedure used to select the SVC.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5788 in / 1560 out tokens · 42413 ms · 2026-06-26T04:39:01.057217+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Lassner, W.-D

    E. Lassner, W.-D. Schubert, Tungsten: Properties, Chemistry, Technology of the Element, Alloys, and Chemical Compounds, Springer US, 1999

    1999

  2. [2]

    Rieth, S

    M. Rieth, S. L. Dudarev, S. M. de Vicente, J. Aktaa, T. Ahlgren, S. Antusch, D. E. J. Armstrong, R. Ahlstrand, M. Balden, G. Pintsuk, P. Grigorev, S. Kurinskiy, Recent progress in research on tungsten materials for nuclear fusion applications in europe, Journal of Nuclear Materials 432 (1-3) (2013) 482–500.doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.018

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.018 2013

  3. [3]

    J. Webb, S. Gollapudi, I. Charit, An overview of creep in tungsten and its alloys, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 82 (2019) 69–80

    2019

  4. [4]

    J. Das, G. A. Rao, S. Pabi, M. Sankaranarayana, T. Nandy, Thermo-mechanical processing, microstructure and tensile properties of a tungsten heavy alloy, Materials Science and Engineering: A 613 (2014) 48–59

    2014

  5. [5]

    S. H. Lee, S. Y . Kwon, H. J. Ham, Thermal conductivity of tungsten–copper composites, Thermochimica acta 542 (2012) 2–5

    2012

  6. [6]

    Eckstein, J

    W. Eckstein, J. Laszlo, Sputtering of tungsten and molybdenum, Journal of nuclear materials 183 (1-2) (1991) 19–24

    1991

  7. [7]

    Venhaus, R

    T. Venhaus, R. Causey, R. Doerner, T. Abeln, Behavior of tungsten exposed to high fluences of low energy hydrogen isotopes, Journal of Nuclear Materials 290 (2001) 505–508

    2001

  8. [8]

    Haasz, J

    A. Haasz, J. Davis, Deuterium retention in beryllium, molybdenum and tungsten at high fluences, Journal of Nuclear Materials 241 (1997) 1076–1081

    1997

  9. [9]

    Philipps, Tungsten as material for plasma-facing components in fusion devices, Journal of Nuclear Materials 415 (1) (2011) S2–S9.doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.110

    V . Philipps, Tungsten as material for plasma-facing components in fusion devices, Journal of Nuclear Materials 415 (1) (2011) S2–S9.doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.110

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2011.01.110 2011

  10. [10]

    Federici, C

    G. Federici, C. H. Skinner, J. N. Brooks, J. P. Coad, C. Grisolia, A. A. Haasz, A. Hassanein, V . Philipps, C. S. Pitcher, J. Roth, W. R. Wampler, D. Whyte, Plasma–wall interactions in iter, Journal of Nuclear Materials 313–316 (2003) 11–22. doi:10.1016/S0022-3115(02)01365-3

    work page doi:10.1016/s0022-3115(02)01365-3 2003

  11. [11]

    Wronski, A

    A. Wronski, A. Foukdeux, The ductile-brittle transition in polycrystalline tungsten, Journal of the Less Common Metals 8 (3) (1965) 149–158

    1965

  12. [12]

    C. S. Täzl, J. Reiser, H. Greuner, et al., Ductile-to-brittle transition temperature of advanced tungsten alloys, Journal of Nuclear Materials 509 (2018) 506–515

    2018

  13. [13]

    D. H. Lassila, F. Magness, D. Freeman, Ductile-brittle transition temperature testing of tungsten using the three-point bend test, Tech. rep., Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States) (1991)

    1991

  14. [14]

    S. J. Zinkle, A. Möslang, Materials for fusion energy systems, MRS Bulletin 37 (2012) 349–357. 36

    2012

  15. [15]

    Nogami, S

    S. Nogami, S. Watanabe, J. Reiser, M. Rieth, S. Sickinger, A. Hasegawa, A review of impact properties of tungsten materials, Fusion Engineering and Design 135 (2018) 196–203.doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.08.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.fusengdes.2018.08.001 2018

  16. [16]

    Y . Liu, Q. Wang, J. Xu, J. Zhang, Q. Fang, P. Song, Microstructural evolution and mechanical properties of tungsten alloys reinforced by ceramic particle dispersions, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 78 (2019) 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.09.010

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2018.09.010 2019

  17. [17]

    X. Hu, T. Koyanagi, L. L. Snead, Y . Katoh, Irradiation hardening of pure tungsten exposed to neutron irradiation, Journal of Nuclear Materials 480 (2016) 235–243. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.08.024

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.08.024 2016

  18. [18]

    R. G. Abernethy, ..., Irradiation-induced ductile-to-brittle transition shifts in tungsten, Journal of Nuclear Materials 527 (2019) 151799. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151799

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151799 2019

  19. [19]

    Terentyev, ..., Mechanical performance of irradiated tungsten under fusion conditions, Tungsten 3 (2021) 415–432.doi:10.1007/s42864-021-000XX-X

    D. Terentyev, ..., Mechanical performance of irradiated tungsten under fusion conditions, Tungsten 3 (2021) 415–432.doi:10.1007/s42864-021-000XX-X

    work page doi:10.1007/s42864-021-000xx-x 2021

  20. [21]

    Lang, ..., Transmutation effects on electrical resistivity in neutron-irradiated tungsten, Acta Materialia 255 (2023) 119048.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119048

    M. Lang, ..., Transmutation effects on electrical resistivity in neutron-irradiated tungsten, Acta Materialia 255 (2023) 119048.doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119048

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2023.119048 2023

  21. [22]

    Y . Shi, Z. Jiang, W. Zhang, T. Xia, X. Ren, M. Wang, L. Liang, K. Zhu, Thermal conductivity and deuterium/helium plasma irradiation effect of wtacrvti high entropy alloy, Journal of Nuclear Materials 594 (2024) 154991. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.154991

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.154991 2024

  22. [23]

    S. Cui, R. P. Doerner, M. J. Simmonds, C. Xu, Y . Wang, E. Dechaumphai, E. Fu, G. R. Tynan, R. Chen, Thermal conductivity degradation and recovery in ion beam damaged tungsten at different temperature, Journal of Nuclear Materials 511 (2018) 141–147. doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.09.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.09.002 2018

  23. [24]

    H. Sina, Y . Dai, Y . Lee, M. Wohlmuther, Thermal diffusivity of tungsten irradiated by protons in spallation environment up to 26.5 dpa, Journal of Nuclear Materials 601 (2024) 155324.doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.155324

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2024.155324 2024

  24. [25]

    J. R. Stephens, The ’rhenium effect’ in BCC alloys, Metallurgical Transactions A 11 (1980) 1297–1307

    1980

  25. [26]

    Romaner, C

    L. Romaner, C. Ambrosch-Draxl, R. Pippan, Effect of rhenium on the dislocation core structure in tungsten, Physical review letters 104 (19) (2010) 195503. 37

    2010

  26. [27]

    Y . N. Gornostyrev, M. Katsnelson, G. Peschanskikh, A. Trefilov, On the nature of the rhenium effect. peculiarities of the band structure and elastic moduli of w-and mo-based alloys, physica status solidi (b) 164 (1) (1991) 185–193

    1991

  27. [28]

    Riesch, Y

    J. Riesch, Y . Han, J. Almanstötter, J. Coenen, T. Höschen, B. Jasper, P. Zhao, C. Linsmeier, R. Neu, Development of tungsten fibre-reinforced tungsten composites towards their use in demo—potassium doped tungsten wire, Physica Scripta 2016 (T167) (2016) 014006

    2016

  28. [29]

    Nogami, S

    S. Nogami, S. Watanabe, J. Reiser, M. Rieth, S. Sickinger, A. Hasegawa, Improvement of impact properties of tungsten by potassium doping, Fusion Engineering and Design 140 (2019) 48–61

    2019

  29. [30]

    Sheng, I

    H. Sheng, I. Uytdenhouwen, G. Van Oost, J. Vleugels, Mechanical properties and microstructural characterizations of potassium doped tungsten, Nuclear engineering and design 246 (2012) 198–202

    2012

  30. [31]

    T. P. R. de Kloe, J. van der Vlist, H. Schut, et al., The role of potassium in K-doped tungsten wire, Acta Materialia 56 (16) (2008) 4417–4424

    2008

  31. [32]

    Tandoc, Y .-J

    C. Tandoc, Y .-J. Hu, L. Qi, P. K. Liaw, Mining of lattice distortion, strength, and intrinsic ductility of refractory high entropy alloys, npj Computational Materials 9 (1) (2023) 53

    2023

  32. [33]

    Woodcox, A

    M. Woodcox, A. Mahata, Enhancing ductility in tungsten-based refractory high-entropy alloys through al and cu alloying: A first-principles study, Next Research (2025) 100743

    2025

  33. [34]

    W. Chen, X. Li, Structure and mechanical properties of novel lightweight refractory high entropy alloys nbmotizr-(al/v): A combined first principles and experimental study, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 973 (2024) 172855

    2024

  34. [35]

    J. Qi, X. Fan, D. I. Hoyos, M. Widom, P. K. Liaw, J. Poon, Integrated design of aluminum-enriched high-entropy refractory b2 alloys with synergy of high strength and ductility, Science Advances 10 (49) (2024) eadq0083

    2024

  35. [36]

    Vitek, Core structure of dislocations in BCC metals, Philosophical Magazine 18 (154) (1968) 773–786

    V . Vitek, Core structure of dislocations in BCC metals, Philosophical Magazine 18 (154) (1968) 773–786

    1968

  36. [37]

    R. M. Cannon, R. O. Ritchie, Grain boundary embrittlement in tungsten, Acta Materialia 53 (17) (2005) 4529–4537

    2005

  37. [38]

    D. E. J. Armstrong, A. J. Wilkinson, S. G. Roberts, MD simulation of fracture at a tungsten grain boundary, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 26 (37) (2014) 375702

    2014

  38. [39]

    C. L. M. Petersson, A. Fredriksson, S. Melin, A. Ahadi, P. Hansson, A molecular dynamics study on the influence of vacancies and interstitial helium on mechanical properties of tungsten, Journal of Nuclear Materials 580 (2023) 154378

    2023

  39. [40]

    Alivaliollahi, G

    A. Alivaliollahi, G. Alahyarizadeh, A. Minuchehr, Effect of temperature, pressure, crystal defect types, and densities on the mechanical behavior of tungsten under tensile deformation: A molecular dynamics simulation study, Nuclear Materials and Energy 37 (2023) 101555. 38

    2023

  40. [41]

    Cereceda, M

    D. Cereceda, M. Diehl, F. Roters, P. Shanthraj, D. Raabe, J. M. Perlado, J. Marian, Linking atomistic, kinetic monte carlo and crystal plasticity simulations of single-crystal tungsten strength, GAMM-Mitteilungen 38 (2) (2015) 213–227

    2015

  41. [42]

    Jumper, R

    J. Jumper, R. Evans, A. Pritzel, et al., Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold, Nature 596 (2021) 583–589

    2021

  42. [43]

    A. Jain, S. P. Ong, G. Hautier, et al., Commentary: The Materials Project: A materials genome approach to accelerating materials innovation, APL Materials 1 (1) (2013) 011002

    2013

  43. [44]

    Z. Li, Z. Zeng, R. Tan, M. Taheri, N. Birbilis, A database of mechanical properties for multi principal element alloys, Chemical Data Collections 47 (2023) 101068

    2023

  44. [45]

    C. Borg, C. Frey, J. Moh, T. Pollock, S. Gorsse, D. Miracle, O. Senkov, B. Meredig, J. Saal, Expanded dataset of mechanical properties and observed phases of multi-principal element alloys, sci data. 7 (2020) 430

    2020

  45. [46]

    Detor, S

    A. Detor, S. Oppenheimer, R. Casey, C. Crawford, Refractory high entropy alloy dataset with room temperature ductility screening, Data in Brief 45 (2022) 108582

    2022

  46. [47]

    Reiser, M

    J. Reiser, M. Rieth, B. Dafferner, et al., On the challenge of tungsten’s brittleness: An overview of the situation and a perspective on solutions, Nuclear Fusion 57 (9) (2017) 092007

    2017

  47. [48]

    B. G. Butler, J. D. Paramore, J. P. Ligda, C. Ren, Z. Z. Fang, S. C. Middlemas, K. J. Hemker, Mechanisms of deformation and ductility in tungsten–a review, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 75 (2018) 248–261

    2018

  48. [49]

    Lu, Y .-H

    Y . Lu, Y .-H. Zhang, E. Ma, W.-Z. Han, Relative mobility of screw versus edge dislocations controls the ductile-to-brittle transition in metals, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (37) (2021) e2110596118

    2021

  49. [50]

    Gumbsch, J

    P. Gumbsch, J. Riedle, A. Hartmaier, H. F. Fischmeister, Controlling factors for the brittle-to-ductile transition in tungsten single crystals, Science 282 (5392) (1998) 1293–1295

    1998

  50. [51]

    C. Ren, Z. Z. Fang, M. Koopman, B. Butler, J. Paramore, S. Middlemas, Methods for improving ductility of tungsten-a review, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials 75 (2018) 170–183

    2018

  51. [52]

    Z. Xie, R. Liu, S. Miao, X. Yang, T. Zhang, X. Wang, Q. Fang, C. Liu, G. Luo, Y . Lian, et al., Extraordinary high ductility/strength of the interface designed bulk w-zrc alloy plate at relatively low temperature, Scientific reports 5 (1) (2015) 16014

    2015

  52. [53]

    H. Li, S. Wurster, C. Motz, L. Romaner, C. Ambrosch-Draxl, R. Pippan, Dislocation-core symmetry and slip planes in tungsten alloys: Ab initio calculations and microcantilever bending experiments, Acta materialia 60 (2) (2012) 748–758. 39

    2012

  53. [54]

    Tsuru, S

    T. Tsuru, S. Han, S. Matsuura, Z. Chen, K. Kishida, I. Iobzenko, S. I. Rao, C. Woodward, E. P. George, H. Inui, Intrinsic factors responsible for brittle versus ductile nature of refractory high-entropy alloys, Nature Communications 15 (1) (2024) 1706

    2024

  54. [55]

    Hatler, I

    C. Hatler, I. Robin, H. Kim, N. Curtis, B. Sun, E. Aydogan, S. Fensin, A. Couet, E. Martinez, D. J. Thoma, et al., The path towards plasma facing components: A review of state-of-the-art in w-based refractory high-entropy alloys, Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 34 (2025) 101201

    2025

  55. [56]

    P. L. Raffo, Yielding and fracture in tungsten and tungsten-rhenium alloys, Journal of the Less Common Metals 17 (2) (1969) 133–149

    1969

  56. [57]

    Ouyang, P

    G. Ouyang, P. Singh, R. Su, D. D. Johnson, M. J. Kramer, J. H. Perepezko, O. N. Senkov, D. Miracle, J. Cui, Design of refractory multi-principal-element alloys for high-temperature applications, npj Computational Materials 9 (2023) 141. doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01095-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41524-023-01095-4 2023

  57. [58]

    O. N. Senkov, D. B. Miracle, Generalization of intrinsic ductile-to-brittle criteria by pugh and pettifor for materials with a cubic crystal structure, Scientific Reports 11 (2021) 4531. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83953-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-83953-z 2021

  58. [59]

    Zhang, C

    Y . Zhang, C. Ling, A strategy to apply machine learning to small datasets in materials science, Npj Computational Materials 4 (1) (2018) 25

    2018

  59. [60]

    Martin, C

    P. Martin, C. E. Madrid-Cortes, C. Cáceres, N. Araya, C. Aguilar, J. M. Cabrera, Heaps: A user-friendly tool for the design and exploration of high-entropy alloys based on semi-empirical parameters, Computer Physics Communications 278 (2022) 108398

    2022

  60. [61]

    D. D. Johnson, P. Singh, A. Smirnov, N. Argibay, Universal maximum strength of solid metals and alloys, Physical Review Letters 130 (16) (2023) 166101

    2023

  61. [62]

    Pugh, Xcii

    S. Pugh, Xcii. relations between the elastic moduli and the plastic properties of polycrystalline pure metals, The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 45 (367) (1954) 823–843

    1954

  62. [63]

    G. C. Cawley, N. L. Talbot, On over-fitting in model selection and subsequent selection bias in performance evaluation, The Journal of Machine Learning Research 11 (2010) 2079–2107

    2010

  63. [64]

    Talignani, R

    A. Talignani, R. Seede, A. Whitt, S. Zheng, J. Ye, I. Karaman, M. M. Kirka, Y . Katoh, Y . M. Wang, A review on additive manufacturing of refractory tungsten and tungsten alloys, Additive Manufacturing 58 (2022) 103009

    2022

  64. [65]

    M. D. Ernst, Permutation methods: a basis for exact inference, Statistical Science (2004) 676–685

    2004

  65. [66]

    Benjamini, Y

    Y . Benjamini, Y . Hochberg, Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing, Journal of the Royal statistical society: series B (Methodological) 57 (1) (1995) 289–300. 40

    1995

  66. [67]

    D. G. Altman, J. M. Bland, Statistics notes: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence, Bmj 311 (7003) (1995) 485

    1995

  67. [68]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals, Physical Review B 47 (1993) 558–561

    1993

  68. [69]

    Kresse, J

    G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set, Physical Review B 54 (1996) 11169–11186

    1996

  69. [70]

    P. E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B 50 (1994) 17953–17979

    1994

  70. [71]

    Kresse, D

    G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method, Physical Review B 59 (1999) 1758–1775

    1999

  71. [72]

    J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple, Physical Review Letters 77 (1996) 3865–3868

    1996

  72. [73]

    S. M. Lundberg, S.-I. Lee, A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017)

    2017

  73. [74]

    L. S. Shapley, et al., A value for n-person games (1953)

    1953

  74. [75]

    Varvenne, A

    C. Varvenne, A. Luque, W. A. Curtin, Theory of strengthening in fcc high entropy alloys, Acta Materialia 118 (2016) 164–176

    2016

  75. [76]

    L. Qi, D. Chrzan, Tuning ideal tensile strengths and intrinsic ductility of bcc refractory alloys, Physical review letters 112 (11) (2014) 115503

    2014

  76. [77]

    M. Yang, L. Shao, J.-M. Duan, X.-T. Chen, B.-Y . Tang, Correlation between mechanical properties and valence electron concentration for nbtizrm (m= hf, ta, w) refractory high entropy alloys: an ab initio study, Applied Physics A 127 (5) (2021) 341

    2021

  77. [78]

    S. M. Shaikh, B. Murty, S. K. Yadav, Designing a thermodynamically stable and intrinsically ductile refractory alloy, Journal of Alloys and Compounds 939 (2023) 168597

    2023

  78. [79]

    D. G. Sangiovanni, K. Kaufmann, K. Vecchio, Valence electron concentration as key parameter to control the fracture resistance of refractory high-entropy carbides, Science Advances 9 (37) (2023) eadi2960.doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi2960

    work page doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi2960 2023

  79. [80]

    B. Vela, T. Hastings, M. Allen, R. Arróyave, Visualizing high entropy alloy spaces: methods and best practices, Digital Discovery 4 (1) (2025) 181–194

    2025

  80. [81]

    Z. Han, N. Chen, S. Zhao, L. Fan, G. Yang, Y . Shao, K. Yao, Effect of ti additions on mechanical properties of nbmotaw and vnbmotaw refractory high entropy alloys, Intermetallics 84 (2017) 153–157

    2017

Showing first 80 references.