pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27346 · v1 · pith:3WRGMNBPnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

3D Magnetic Field Vectors in Space: Bubbles, Clouds, and Filaments

Mehrnoosh Tahani , Anna Ordog , Jennifer West , Georgia V. Panopoulou , Hiroko Shinnaga , Marijke Haverkorn This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 03:36 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords magnetic fieldsinterstellar mediumstar formationFaraday rotationsynchrotron emission3D mappingSKAgalactic evolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

SKA observations can reconstruct three-dimensional magnetic field vectors in interstellar structures like bubbles, clouds and filaments.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that full three-dimensional magnetic field vectors are needed to understand how the interstellar medium evolves into stars and planets. It explains that projection effects and the indirect link between tracers and geometry make this difficult with current data. The work describes specific techniques based on synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation that can recover vector information across a range of objects from supernova remnants to molecular cores. It then shows how the sensitivity, resolution and uv-coverage of SKA AA4 will make these techniques practical at scale.

Core claim

Mapping three-dimensional magnetic field vectors in space is required to understand the interplay between field strength, orientation and density structures that governs star formation. Although projection effects and the complex relationship between observable tracers and field geometry create challenges, synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation of both compact sources and diffuse emission provide the necessary probes for objects such as supernova remnants, superbubbles, HII regions, HI filaments, molecular clouds, filaments and cores. SKA AA4 will implement these techniques with vastly improved sensitivity, resolution and uv-coverage compared to existing datasets, thereby enhancing the ab

What carries the argument

Synchrotron emission combined with Faraday rotation measurements of compact sources and diffuse emission, used to recover full three-dimensional field vectors.

If this is right

  • Reconstruction of 3D magnetic field vectors becomes feasible for supernova remnants, superbubbles, HII regions and HI filaments in the diffuse ISM.
  • The same techniques extend to dense ISM structures including molecular clouds, filaments and cores.
  • Improved data quality from SKA AA4 will allow direct comparison of field orientation with density structures across multiple spatial scales.
  • Magnetic field contributions to the interstellar energy budget can be quantified in three dimensions rather than line-of-sight projections.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Combining the radio techniques with existing dust polarization maps could provide cross-checks on field geometry in overlapping regions.
  • Successful 3D reconstructions would allow direct tests of whether magnetic fields align with or perpendicular to filamentary structures at different evolutionary stages.
  • The methods could be applied to extragalactic targets once SKA sensitivity reaches nearby galaxies, linking Galactic and extragalactic field evolution.

Load-bearing premise

The complex relationship between observable tracers such as synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation and the underlying field geometry can be disentangled sufficiently to obtain reliable full vector information despite projection effects.

What would settle it

Independent measurements of field direction and strength in the same volumes, for example from Zeeman splitting in dense gas or from dust polarization combined with velocity information, that show systematic mismatches with the vectors reconstructed from SKA synchrotron and rotation data would falsify the claim that the techniques yield reliable 3D vectors.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27346 by Anna Ordog, Georgia V. Panopoulou, Hiroko Shinnaga, Jennifer West, Marijke Haverkorn, Mehrnoosh Tahani.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic illustration of the limitation of 2D projections. a perpendicular magnetic field vector to an elongated cloud may appear parallel when projected onto the plane of sky. Mapping 3D magnetic field vectors from observations is extremely challenging. The biggest challenge is obtaining the complete vector direction of the field, including the plane-of-sky direction. Other challenges include determining… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Angular resolution and wavelength squared coverage of existing and future interferometric and single-antenna surveys. 40 20 0 20 40 60 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Normalized Fractional P ola riz a tio n ( R M S F 1 ) Multiple Faraday Screens SKA-Low (AA4) SKA-Mid 1 (AA4) SKA-Mid 2 (AA4) Combined 40 20 0 20 40 60 80 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Normalized Fractional P ola riz a tio n ( R M S F 1 ) Two Faraday Screen… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Examples of different Faraday rotation configurations with the separate SKA components, as well as combined. Top: Multiple Faraday screens, resolved SKA-Low, partially resolved in SKA-Mid 1, and blended in SKA-Mid 2. Middle and Bottom: Comparing two well-separated Faraday screens to a Burn slab scenario with edges at the same Faraday depths. SKA-Mid 1 is able to distinguish between these scenarios. 11 [PI… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Peak polarized intensity map of the SN1006 field. The smaller green rectangle highlights a filamentary structure that has much finer scale structure when compared with the surrounding emission. (Reproduced with permission from Vanderwoude (2025)). majority of which are within a few hundred parsecs from the Sun, usually associated with the wall of the Local Bubble (Kalberla et al., 2016). Polarized thermal … view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Line-of-sight magnetic fields obtained by the MC-BLOS technique in the Perseus cloud and its reconstructed 3D field, bending around the cloud and forming a concave arc-shaped morphology (Tahani et al., 2022b). Right: Expectations for probing molecular clouds at low latitude with an RM grid: 2D distribution of the number of RMs per cloud versus the corresponding smallest POS scale that will be probed.… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetic fields play important roles in the star-formation process across different spatial scales. The interplay between magnetic field strength (a key component of the interstellar medium's energy budget) and field orientation relative to density structures impacts how interstellar material evolves toward star formation. To understand galactic evolution toward stars, planets, and ultimately life, we need to map three-dimensional (3D) magnetic field vectors in 3D space. However, determining full vector information remains challenging due to projection effects and the complex relationship between observable tracers and field geometry. We outline the observational techniques that can be used to probe the 3D magnetic field structures of objects such as supernova remnants (SNR), superbubbles, HII regions, and HI filaments in the diffuse interstellar medium (ISM), and objects in the dense ISM such as molecular clouds, filaments, and cores. The main SKA-specific observational techniques include synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation of both compact sources and the diffuse emission. We discuss how SKA AA4 will allow implementation of the techniques we describe, leveraging the vastly improved sensitivity, resolution and uv-coverage compared to existing datasets. This will enhance our ability to reconstruct 3D magnetic field vectors, advancing our understanding of magnetic fields in Galactic evolution and star formation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a review outlining established observational techniques based on synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation (of both compact sources and diffuse emission) to probe 3D magnetic field vectors in ISM structures including supernova remnants, superbubbles, HII regions, HI filaments, molecular clouds, filaments, and cores. It argues that SKA AA4's improved sensitivity, resolution, and uv-coverage will enable implementation of these techniques to reconstruct full 3D vectors, advancing understanding of magnetic fields in Galactic evolution and star formation, despite noted challenges from projection effects and tracer-geometry relationships.

Significance. If the outlined techniques prove implementable with SKA data as claimed, the review would be significant for guiding future observations and potentially providing 3D magnetic field maps essential for models of star formation and ISM evolution. The paper correctly identifies the scientific motivation and established methods but does not introduce new data, derivations, or validations.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that SKA AA4 improvements will suffice to reconstruct reliable 3D vectors rests on the assumption that enhanced sensitivity/resolution/uv-coverage will disentangle projection effects and the complex tracer-geometry relationship. The manuscript flags these as persistent challenges but provides no specific mitigation strategies, inversion tests, or simulations showing how the degeneracies become resolvable, leaving the load-bearing step unsupported.
minor comments (1)
  1. The manuscript would benefit from explicit citations to foundational papers on synchrotron and Faraday techniques applied to the listed object classes (e.g., SNR, molecular clouds) to strengthen the review character.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments and for recognizing the scientific motivation and established methods in our review. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that SKA AA4 improvements will suffice to reconstruct reliable 3D vectors rests on the assumption that enhanced sensitivity/resolution/uv-coverage will disentangle projection effects and the complex tracer-geometry relationship. The manuscript flags these as persistent challenges but provides no specific mitigation strategies, inversion tests, or simulations showing how the degeneracies become resolvable, leaving the load-bearing step unsupported.

    Authors: As this manuscript is a review of established observational techniques rather than a methods or simulation paper, it summarizes techniques from the literature (synchrotron emission and Faraday rotation of compact and diffuse sources) that have been shown to yield 3D vector information when applied to ISM structures. The text explicitly identifies projection effects and tracer-geometry degeneracies as ongoing challenges. The claim regarding SKA AA4 is that its improved sensitivity, resolution, and uv-coverage will enable wider and higher-fidelity application of these same techniques, thereby reducing the practical impact of the degeneracies through better sampling of the relevant scales and structures. We agree that the abstract could state this basis more explicitly and will revise it to clarify that the anticipated improvements rest on the application of literature-established methods with higher-quality data, while the challenges themselves are not claimed to be eliminated. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Review paper with no derivations, predictions, or load-bearing self-references.

full rationale

The manuscript is an observational review outlining established techniques (synchrotron emission, Faraday rotation) for probing 3D magnetic fields in various ISM structures. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, no claimed first-principles derivations, and no predictions that reduce to inputs by construction. The forward-looking statement about SKA AA4 is an expectation based on improved instrumental capabilities rather than a mathematical result. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes are invoked to support any derivation. The text is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review-style paper whose abstract introduces no free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The text relies on background knowledge of radio astronomy techniques without adding new ones.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5775 in / 1121 out tokens · 53810 ms · 2026-06-26T03:36:05.826270+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 119 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/addecc. B. D. Ball et al.ApJ, 988(1):75,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/addecc

  2. [2]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/addc63. J. Bally. Overview of the Orion Complex. In B. Reipurth, editor,Handbook of Star Forming Regions,VolumeI, volume 4, page

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/addc63

  3. [3]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.0812.0046. R. Beck and M. Krause.Astronomical Notes, 326:414–427,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.0812.0046

  4. [4]

    doi: 10.1002/asna.200510366. A. S. Borlaff et al.ApJ, 952(1):4,

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.200510366

  5. [5]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd934. F. Boulanger et al.A&A, 687:A102,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acd934

  6. [6]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348953. T. L. Bourke et al. InAdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSKA–II(AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348953

  7. [7]

    arXiv search: Report number AASKAII/Bourke01. A. Bracco et al.A&A, 644:A5, 2020a. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039282. A. Bracco et al.A&A, 644:L3, 2020b. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039283. A. Bracco et al.A&A, 694:A148,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039282

  8. [8]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452010. A. Bracco et al. InAdvancingAstrophysicswith the SKA –II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452010

  9. [9]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20052990. B. J. Burn.MNRAS, 133:67,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:

  10. [10]

    CCAT-Prime Collaboration et al.ApJSS, 264(1):7,

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/133.1.67. CCAT-Prime Collaboration et al.ApJSS, 264(1):7,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/133.1.67

  11. [11]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac9838. S. Chandrasekhar and E. Fermi.ApJ, 118:113,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ac9838

  12. [12]

    doi: 10.1086/145731. C.-Y. Chen et al.MNRAS, 485(3):3499–3513,

    work page doi:10.1086/145731

  13. [13]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz618. C.-Y. Chen et al.MNRAS, 494(2):1971–1987,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz618 1971

  14. [14]

    , keywords =

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa835. 25 3D Fields Tahani et al. Z. Chen et al.ApJ, 838(2):80,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa835

  15. [15]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa65d3. T.-C. Ching et al.Nature, 601(7891):49–52, 2022a. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04159-x. T.-C. Ching et al.Nature, 601(7891):49–52, 2022b. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04159-x. S.E.Clark,J.E.G.Peek,andM.E.Putman. ApJ,789(1):82,2014. doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/ 1/82. S. E. Clark, J. E. G. Peek, and M. A. Miville-Deschênes.ApJ, 874(2):171,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa65d3 2014

  16. [16]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ 833/2/176. D. P. Clemens et al.ApJSS, 249(2):23,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/

  17. [17]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab9f30. C. Collischon et al.A&A, 653:A16,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab9f30

  18. [18]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040153. R. M. Crutcher.ARA&A, 50:29–63,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202040153

  19. [19]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514. R. M. Crutcher and A. J. Kemball.Frontiers in Astronomyand Space Sciences, 6:66,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125514

  20. [20]

    doi: 10.3389/fspas.2019.00066. R. M. Crutcher et al.ApJL, 514:L121–L124,

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00066 2019

  21. [21]

    doi: 10.1086/311952. T. Dacunha, S. Martin-Alvarez, S. E. Clark, and E. Lopez-Rodriguez.ApJ, 980(2):197,

    work page doi:10.1086/311952

  22. [22]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adab72. I. M. Daly et al.Nature Communications, 7(1):12140,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adab72

  23. [23]

    doi: 10.1038/ ncomms12140

    ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/ ncomms12140. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12140. T. M. Dame, D. Hartmann, and P. Thaddeus.ApJ, 547(2):792–813,

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms12140 2041

  24. [24]

    doi: 10.1086/318388. L. Davis.PhysicalReview, 81(5):890–891,

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/318388

  25. [25]

    Physical Review , year = 1951, month = mar, volume =

    doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.81.890.2. L.Deharveng,A.Zavagno,andJ.Caplan. A&A,433(2):565–577,2005. doi: 10.1051/0004-6361: 20041946. Y. Doi et al.ApJ, 914(2):122, 2021a. doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abfcc5. Y. Doi et al.ApJL, 923(1):L9, 2021b. doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac3cc1. A. Erceg et al.A&A, 663:A7,

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.81.890.2 2005

  26. [26]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142244. A. Erceg et al.A&A, 688:A200,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142244

  27. [27]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450082. L. Fanciullo et al.MNRAS, 512(2):1985–2002,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202450082 1985

  28. [28]

    J.D.FiegeandR.E.Pudritz

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac528. J.D.FiegeandR.E.Pudritz. MNRAS,311:85–104,2000a. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03066. x. J. D. Fiege and R. E. Pudritz.MNRAS, 311:105–119, 2000b. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000. 03067.x. L. M. Fissel et al.ApJ, 878(2):110,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac528 2000

  29. [29]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb0. B. M. Gaensler et al.PASA, 42:e091,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab1eb0

  30. [30]

    doi: 10.1017/pasa.2025.10031. P. F. Goldsmith and D. Li.ApJ, 622(2):938–958,

    work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2025.10031 2025

  31. [31]

    doi: 10.1086/428032. A. A. Goodman and C. Heiles.ApJ, 424:208,

    work page doi:10.1086/428032

  32. [32]

    doi: 10.1086/173884. A. Gupta et al.ApJ, 930(1):67,

    work page doi:10.1086/173884

  33. [33]

    A.Hacaretal

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63bc. A.Hacaretal. InS.Inutsukaetal.,editors, ProtostarsandPlanetsVII,volume534of Astronomical Society ofthe PacificConferenceSeries, page 153,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac63bc

  34. [34]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09562. G. Halal, S. E. Clark, and M. Tahani.ApJ, 973(1):54,

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.09562

  35. [35]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e0. J. L. Han.ARA&A, 55(1):111–157,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e0

  36. [36]

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055221. M. Haverkorn, P. Katgert, and A. G. de Bruyn.A&A, 403:1031–1044,

    work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055221

  37. [37]

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies8030053. C. Heiles.ApJ, 229:533–537,

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies8030053

  38. [38]

    doi: 10.1086/156986. P. Hennebelle and S.-i. Inutsuka.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:1902.00798,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1086/156986 1902

  39. [39]

    doi: 10.1086/430814. R. H. Hildebrand et al.ApJ, 696:567–573,

    work page doi:10.1086/430814

  40. [40]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/696/1/567. A. S. Hill.Galaxies, 6(4):129,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/696/1/567

  41. [41]

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies6040129. T. Hoang and A. Lazarian.ApJ, 831(2):159,

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies6040129

  42. [42]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/159. T. Hoang and B. Truong.ApJ, 965(2):183,

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/831/2/159

  43. [43]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a56. M. Houde et al.ApJ, 706(2):1504–1516,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a56

  44. [44]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/706/2/1504. Y. Hu and A. Lazarian.MNRAS, 524(2):2379–2394, 2023a. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1996. Y. Hu and A. Lazarian.MNRAS, 519(3):3736–3748, 2023b. doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3744. S. Hutschenreuter et al.A&A, 657:A43,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/706/2/1504

  45. [45]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140486. J. Hwang et al.ApJ, 985(2):222,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202140486

  46. [46]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/adce80. S. Ideguchi, T. Inoue, T. Akahori, and K. Takahashi.MNRAS, 513(3):3289–3301,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adce80

  47. [47]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1086. T. Inoue et al.PASJ, 70:S53,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1086

  48. [48]

    doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx089. S.-i. Inutsuka, T. Inoue, K. Iwasaki, and T. Hosokawa.A&A, 580:A49,

    work page doi:10.1093/pasj/psx089

  49. [49]

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies7020052. T. R. Jaffe et al.MNRAS, 401(2):1013–1028,

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies7020052

  50. [50]

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15745.x. R. Jansson and G. R. Farrar.ApJ, 757(1):14,

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15745.x 2009

  51. [51]

    doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/14. V. Jelić et al.A&A, 615:L3,

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/14

  52. [52]

    M.Johnston-Hollittetal.In AdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSquareKilometreArray(AASKA14), page 92,

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833291. M.Johnston-Hollittetal.In AdvancingAstrophysicswiththeSquareKilometreArray(AASKA14), page 92,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833291

  53. [53]

    doi: 10.22323/1.215.0092. S. L. Jung et al.MNRAS, 534(3):2938–2952,

    work page doi:10.22323/1.215.0092

  54. [54]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2245. P. M. W. Kalberla.A&A, 694:L11,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stae2245

  55. [55]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202452771. P. M. W. Kalberla and J. Kerp.A&A, 595:A37,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202452771

  56. [56]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629113. P. M. W. Kalberla et al.ApJ, 821(2):117,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629113

  57. [57]

    doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/117. R. Kandori et al.ApJ, 848(2):110,

    work page doi:10.3847/0004-637x/821/2/117

  58. [58]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa8d18. R. Kandori et al.ApJ, 888(2):120,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aa8d18

  59. [59]

    C.-G.KimandE.C.Ostriker

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6081. C.-G.KimandE.C.Ostriker. TheAstrophysicalJournal,802(2):99,2015.doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/ 802/2/99. URLhttps://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/802/2/99. P. K. King, L. M. Fissel, C.-Y. Chen, and Z.-Y. Li.MNRAS, 474(4):5122–5142,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab6081 2015

  60. [60]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3096. P. K. King, C.-Y. Chen, L. M. Fissel, and Z.-Y. Li.MNRAS, 490(2):2760–2778,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx3096

  61. [61]

    doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2628. R. Kothes and J.-A. Brown. In K. G. Strassmeier, A. G. Kosovichev, and J. E. Beckman, editors, Cosmic Magnetic Fields: From Planets, to Starsand Galaxies, volume 259 ofIAUSymposium, pages 75–80,

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2628

  62. [62]

    doi: 10.1017/S1743921309030087. M. Kounkel, T. Deng, and K. G. Stassun.AJ, 164(2):57,

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921309030087

  63. [63]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac7951. M. R. Krumholz and C. Federrath.Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 6:7,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/ac7951

  64. [64]

    doi: 10.3389/fspas.2019.00007. D. Li and P. F. Goldsmith.ApJ, 585(2):823–839,

    work page doi:10.3389/fspas.2019.00007 2019

  65. [65]

    27 3D Fields Tahani et al

    doi: 10.1086/346227. 27 3D Fields Tahani et al. N. B. Linzer, L. Armillotta, E. C. Ostriker, and E. Quataert.arXive-prints, art. arXiv:2511.13834,

    work page doi:10.1086/346227

  66. [66]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2511.13834. E. Lopez-Rodriguez et al.ApJL, 942(1):L13,

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.13834

  67. [67]

    doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acaaa2. X. Luri et al.A&A, 616:A9,

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/acaaa2 2041

  68. [68]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832964. Y. K. Ma et al. InAdvancing Astrophysicswith the SKA –II (AASKAII)

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201832964

  69. [69]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e9e. C. F. McKee and E. C. Ostriker.ARA&A, 45(1):565–687,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e9e

  70. [70]

    Malicious User Experience Design Research for Cybersecurity

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.45. 051806.110602. M.-A.Miville-Deschênes,N.Murray,andE.J.Lee. ApJ,834(1):57,2017.doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ 834/1/57. N. Mohammed et al.ApJ, 971(1):100,

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.45 2017

  71. [71]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5099. M. Nowotka et al.arXiv e-prints, art. arXiv:2508.20065,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad5099

  72. [72]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2508.20065. A. Ordog, J. C. Brown, R. Kothes, and T. L. Landecker.A&A, 603:A15,

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.20065

  73. [73]

    doi: 10.3390/galaxies7020043. A. Ordog et al.AJ, 169(6):312,

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies7020043

  74. [74]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/adc929. A. Ordog et al.ApJSS, 282(2):53,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-3881/adc929

  75. [75]

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ae2471. M. Padovani and D. Galli.A&A, 620:L4,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ae2471

  76. [76]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834222. G. V. Panopoulou et al.ApJ, 872(1):56,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834222

  77. [77]

    K.Pattleetal

    doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aafdb2. K.Pattleetal. InS.Inutsukaetal.,editors, ProtostarsandPlanetsVII,volume534of Astronomical Society ofthe PacificConferenceSeries, page 193,

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aafdb2

  78. [78]

    doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.11179. V. Pelgrims et al.A&A, 670:A164,

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2203.11179

  79. [79]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244625. S. Pezzuto et al.A&A, 645:A55,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244625

  80. [80]

    doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936534. T. G. S. Pillai et al.NatureAstronomy, 4:1195–1201,

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201936534

Showing first 80 references.