pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27351 · v1 · pith:SP7JJNN3new · submitted 2026-06-25 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall

Specific absorption rate of uniaxial single-domain nanomagnets: stochastic spin dynamics versus linear response theory

H. Kachkachi This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 02:03 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall
keywords specific absorption ratenanomagnetslinear response theorystochastic spin dynamicsNéel relaxation timemagnetic hyperthermiauniaxial anisotropyLandau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linear response theory overestimates nanomagnet heating below resonance but underestimates it by up to 70 percent above resonance for moderate field strengths.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper compares the specific absorption rate computed from direct stochastic integration of the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation against the rate obtained from linear response theory that uses the Debye form with the Néel relaxation time. The two approaches agree exactly when the driving field amplitude is small. For finite amplitudes the relative difference is controlled by the product of driving frequency and relaxation time together with the ratio of magnetic energy to thermal energy. Below the resonance frequency linear response overestimates the absorption rate; above resonance, the regime of blocked particles, it underestimates the rate by as much as 70 percent at moderate field strengths.

Core claim

Both the stochastic LLG method and linear response theory based on the Debye susceptibility with Néel time τ_N yield identical specific absorption rates for small field amplitudes. Their ratio minus one, denoted Λ, has its sign and magnitude set by the dimensionless product ωτ_N in addition to the linearity parameter ξ for the easy-axis geometry. Below resonance (ωτ_N < 1) linear response overestimates the rate; above resonance (ωτ_N > 1) it underestimates the rate by up to ~70% at ξ ~ 2.

What carries the argument

The deviation parameter Λ ≡ SAR_LLL/SAR_LRT − 1 that measures how stochastic spin dynamics depart from the Debye-based linear response prediction as a function of ωτ_N and ξ.

If this is right

  • Below the Debye resonance linear response theory systematically overestimates the specific absorption rate.
  • Above resonance, the regime of blocked nanoparticles, linear response theory underestimates the absorption rate by up to 70 percent when the linearity parameter ξ is around 2.
  • The comparison supplies concrete numerical bounds on the validity of linear response theory for single-particle calculations in magnetic hyperthermia.
  • The single-particle results serve as a benchmark against which extensions that include many-spin internal degrees of freedom or inter-particle interactions can be tested.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In an ensemble of non-interacting particles the 70 percent underestimation would translate directly into an error in predicted temperature rise if linear response theory is used without correction.
  • Varying the Gilbert damping parameter while keeping ωτ_N fixed would test whether the reported deviation persists or is an artifact of the particular relaxation-time definition.
  • The same stochastic-versus-linear comparison performed on particles with cubic rather than uniaxial anisotropy would reveal whether the sign change at resonance is geometry-specific.

Load-bearing premise

That the Néel relaxation time alone fully determines the Debye susceptibility used in linear response theory without further corrections from damping or explicit confirmation that the chosen temperatures straddle the resonance.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement of the specific absorption rate for an isolated uniaxial nanomagnet at ωτ_N greater than 1 and ξ near 2 that lies within a few percent of the linear-response prediction would falsify the reported deviation; a measured value ~70% higher would support it.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27351 by H. Kachkachi.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows a comparison between LLL and the 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 = 2 h0 10 5 10 6 10 7 S A R (W k g 1 ) N 1: blocked T = 25K, 11.1, N 40.9 2 SARLRT SARLLL 1 2 = 2 h0 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 N < 1: fast T = 50K, 5.5, N 0.2 2 SARLRT SARLLL FIG. 2. SARLLL (symbols) and SARLRT (solid line) versus ξ on linear–log axes. Left: T = 25 K (ωτN ≃ 41, blocked regime) — LLL exceeds LRT for ξ ≳ 0.3. Right: T = 50 K (ωτN ≃ 0.… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: illustrates the full η-dependence of Eq. (11) at fixed σ and ξ. The top panel shows Λpert(η) for the Co nanomagnet parameters at T = 50 K (σ ≈ 5.5, τN ≈ 3.9 ns), for two field amplitudes ξ = 0.5 and ξ = 1.0, and also for T = 25 K (σ ≈ 11.1) at ξ = 0.5. Three features are immediately visible. First, Λ changes sign at η = √ 3 for all curves, confirming that this threshold is a property of F(σ, η) alone and i… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Perturbative estimate [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We compute the specific absorption rate of a uniaxial single-domain nanomagnet driven by an alternating magnetic field by two methods: i) direct numerical integration of the stochastic (Langevin) Landau--Lifshitz--Gilbert equation (the LLL approach), and ii) linear response theory (LRT) based on the Debye susceptibility with the N\'eel relaxation time $\tau_\mathrm{N}$. We first analytically show that both methods are equivalent for small magnetic field amplitude, and then compute their deviation $\Lambda\equiv \mathrm{SAR}_{\mathrm{LLL}}/\mathrm{SAR}_{\mathrm{LRT}}-1$ as a function of the magnetic field amplitude for two temperatures chosen on opposite sides of the Debye resonance. One of the main results is that the sign and magnitude of $\Lambda$ are governed by the dimensionless product $\omega\tau_\mathrm{N}$, in addition to the linearity parameter $\xi=\mu_{s}B_{0}/k_{B}T$ for the easy-axis geometry considered here. Indeed, below resonance ($\omega\tau_\mathrm{N}<1$), linear response theory overestimates the specific absorption rate. In contrast, above resonance ($\omega\tau_\mathrm{N}>1$, the regime typical of blocked nanoparticles), linear response theory can underestimate the specific absorption rate by up to $\sim70\%$ at $\xi\sim2$. We expect this work to provide quantitative guidance for the use of linear response theory in magnetic hyperthermia and related nanoscale heat-transport problems, and to serve as a single-particle benchmark for extensions to many-spin and interacting systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript computes the specific absorption rate (SAR) of a uniaxial single-domain nanomagnet under an alternating magnetic field via two routes: direct numerical integration of the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation and linear response theory (LRT) employing the Debye susceptibility with the Néel relaxation time τ_N. It first provides an analytical demonstration of equivalence between the two methods in the small-amplitude limit, then numerically evaluates the relative deviation Λ ≡ SAR_LLL/SAR_LRT − 1 as a function of field amplitude for two temperatures placed on opposite sides of the Debye resonance. The central result is that the sign and magnitude of Λ are controlled by the dimensionless product ωτ_N (in addition to the linearity parameter ξ = μ_s B_0 / k_B T), with LRT overestimating SAR below resonance (ωτ_N < 1) and underestimating it by up to ∼70 % above resonance (ωτ_N > 1) at ξ ∼ 2.

Significance. If the numerical findings hold, the work supplies quantitative guidance on the regime of validity of LRT for magnetic hyperthermia and related heat-transport problems, especially for blocked nanoparticles. The explicit analytical proof of small-field equivalence and the parameter-free, direct comparison of independent LLG trajectories against the closed-form LRT expression constitute clear strengths.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (methods-and-results paragraph): The headline claim that the sign of Λ flips with ωτ_N and that LRT underestimates SAR by ∼70 % above resonance rests on the two chosen temperatures satisfying ωτ_N < 1 versus ωτ_N > 1. No explicit verification is supplied that the resonance frequency extracted from the stochastic LLG trajectories themselves (e.g., peak location of the imaginary part of the susceptibility at the simulated damping α and finite ξ) coincides with the linear Debye value 1/τ_N. Without this check, the reported sign change and magnitude cannot be unambiguously attributed to the claimed ωτ_N regime.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and the constructive suggestion regarding verification of the resonance condition. We address the point below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (methods-and-results paragraph): The headline claim that the sign of Λ flips with ωτ_N and that LRT underestimates SAR by ∼70 % above resonance rests on the two chosen temperatures satisfying ωτ_N < 1 versus ωτ_N > 1. No explicit verification is supplied that the resonance frequency extracted from the stochastic LLG trajectories themselves (e.g., peak location of the imaginary part of the susceptibility at the simulated damping α and finite ξ) coincides with the linear Debye value 1/τ_N. Without this check, the reported sign change and magnitude cannot be unambiguously attributed to the claimed ωτ_N regime.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit numerical verification of the resonance location would strengthen the attribution of the sign change in Λ to the ωτ_N regimes. Although the manuscript already contains an analytical proof of equivalence between stochastic LLG and LRT in the small-amplitude limit (which necessarily implies that the linear susceptibility, including its resonance at 1/τ_N, is identical for the simulated α), we will add in the revised manuscript a direct comparison: the imaginary part of the susceptibility extracted from LLG trajectories at small ξ (e.g., ξ ≪ 1) for the two temperatures, confirming that the peak coincides with the analytical Debye value 1/τ_N. This will be placed in the methods or results section and will unambiguously support the regime assignments used for the headline claim. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; independent numerical vs analytical comparison

full rationale

The paper derives the small-amplitude equivalence between stochastic LLG integration and LRT analytically, then computes the deviation Λ directly from independent numerical trajectories versus the closed-form Debye expression at temperatures selected by the known ωτ_N condition. No parameters are fitted from one method and renamed as predictions from the other, no self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness theorems, and the central result (sign/magnitude of Λ governed by ωτ_N) follows from explicit comparison of the two distinct computations rather than any self-definitional reduction or ansatz smuggling. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard stochastic LLG equation and the Debye susceptibility form with Néel time; these are domain-standard assumptions rather than new postulates, with parameter choices (temperatures, field amplitudes) selected to probe resonance sides rather than fitted to the target deviation.

free parameters (1)
  • Temperatures chosen on opposite sides of Debye resonance
    Selected to illustrate behavior below and above resonance; not obtained by fitting to the deviation data.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Magnetization dynamics obey the stochastic Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation
    Invoked as the microscopic model for thermal spin motion in single-domain particles.
  • domain assumption Linear response is captured by Debye susceptibility using Néel relaxation time τ_N
    Used to define the LRT benchmark; standard for uniaxial particles but assumed without re-derivation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5820 in / 1599 out tokens · 42423 ms · 2026-06-26T02:03:43.157696+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

49 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    author author Q. A. \ Pankhurst , author J. Connolly , author S. K. \ Jones ,\ and\ author J. Dobson ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 journal journal Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics \ volume 36 ,\ pages R167 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0022-3727/36/13/201 2003

  2. [2]

    Dutz \ and\ author R

    author author S. Dutz \ and\ author R. Hergt ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/25/45/452001 journal journal Nanotechnology \ volume 25 ,\ pages 452001 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0957-4484/25/45/452001 2014

  3. [3]

    Hergt , author S

    author author R. Hergt , author S. Dutz , author R. M \"u ller ,\ and\ author M. Zeisberger ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/S26 journal journal J. Phys.: Condens. Mater. \ volume 18 ,\ pages 2919 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1088/0953-8984/18/38/s26 2006

  4. [4]

    \ Zhang \ and\ author M

    author author Y.-F. \ Zhang \ and\ author M. Lu ,\ https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2024.1432189 journal journal Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology \ volume 12 ,\ pages 1432189 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.3389/fbioe.2024.1432189 2024

  5. [5]

    Baldea , author C

    author author I. Baldea , author C. Iacovi t a , author R. A. \ Gurgu , author A. S. \ Vizitiu , author V. R \^a zniceanu ,\ and\ author D. R. \ Mitrea ,\ https://doi.org/10.3390/nano15191519 journal journal Nanomaterials \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1519 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.3390/nano15191519 2025

  6. [6]

    Bai , author S

    author author S. Bai , author S. Hou , author T. Chen , author X. Ma , author C. Gao ,\ and\ author A. Wu ,\ https://doi.org/10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2024.100051 journal journal The Innovation Materials \ volume 2 ,\ pages 100051 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.59717/j.xinn-mater.2024.100051 2024

  7. [7]

    \ Déjardin \ and\ author H

    author author J.-L. \ Déjardin \ and\ author H. Kachkachi ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials \ volume 556 ,\ pages 169354 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022

  8. [8]

    D\'ejardin, H

    author author J.-L. D\'ejardin, H. Kachkachi ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Sciences \ volume 14 ,\ pages 5757 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  9. [9]

    Iglesias et al

    author author C. Iglesias et al. ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-91282-0 journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 11 ,\ pages 11867 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-91282-0 2021

  10. [10]

    Ruta , author Y

    author author S. Ruta , author Y. Fern \'a ndez-Afonso , author S. E. \ Rannala , author M. P. \ Morales , author S. Veintemillas-Verdaguer , author C. Jones , author L. Guti \'e rrez , author R. W. \ Chantrell ,\ and\ author D. Serantes ,\ @noop journal journal Nanoscale Advances \ volume 6 ,\ pages 4207 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    2024

  11. [11]

    author author H. Kachkachi ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04724 title Local-to-global heating crossover in chains of nanomagnets: A two-scale analytical framework , \ ( year 2026 ),\ note submitted for publication; arXiv:2606.04724v1 ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.04724 arXiv:2606.04724 [cond-mat.mes-hall] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  12. [12]

    author author R. E. \ Rosensweig ,\ http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304885302007060 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 252 ,\ pages 370 ( year 2002 ) ,\ note proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Magnetic Fluids, 23-27 Jul. 2001 NoStop

    2002

  13. [13]

    \ D \'e jardin , author F

    author author J.-L. \ D \'e jardin , author F. Vernay , author M. Respaud ,\ and\ author H. Kachkachi ,\ @noop journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 121 ,\ pages 203903 ( year 2017 ) NoStop

    2017

  14. [14]

    N \'e el ,\ @noop journal journal Annales de G \'e ophysique \ volume 5 ,\ pages 99 ( year 1949 ) NoStop

    author author L. N \'e el ,\ @noop journal journal Annales de G \'e ophysique \ volume 5 ,\ pages 99 ( year 1949 ) NoStop

    1949

  15. [15]

    author author W. F. \ Brown ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.130.1677 journal journal Physical Review \ volume 130 ,\ pages 1677 ( year 1963 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.130.1677 1963

  16. [16]

    Carrey , author B

    author author J. Carrey , author B. Mehdaoui ,\ and\ author M. Respaud ,\ @noop journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 109 ,\ pages 083912 ( year 2011 ) NoStop

    2011

  17. [17]

    Andreu \ and\ author E

    author author I. Andreu \ and\ author E. Natividad ,\ https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 journal journal International Journal of Hyperthermia \ volume 29 ,\ pages 739 ( year 2013 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 https://doi.org/10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 NoStop

    work page doi:10.3109/02656736.2013.826825 2013

  18. [18]

    author author N. A. \ Usov , author R. A. \ Rytov ,\ and\ author V. A. \ Bautin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-86323-x journal journal Scientific Reports \ volume 11 ,\ pages 6999 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86323-x 2021

  19. [19]

    Yamaminami , author S

    author author T. Yamaminami , author S. Ota , author S. B. \ Trisnanto , author M. Ishikawa , author T. Yamada , author T. Yoshida , author K. Enpuku ,\ and\ author Y. Takemura ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167401 journal journal Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials \ volume 517 ,\ pages 167401 ( year 2021 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167401 2020

  20. [20]

    \ Lacroix , author R

    author author L.-M. \ Lacroix , author R. B. \ Malaki , author J. Carrey , author S. Lachaize , author M. Respaud , author G. F. \ Goya ,\ and\ author B. Chaudret ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3068195 journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 105 ,\ pages 023911 ( year 2009 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3068195 2009

  21. [21]

    Martinez-Boubeta , author K

    author author C. Martinez-Boubeta , author K. Simeonidis , author A. Makridis , author M. Angelakeris , author O. Iglesias , author P. Guardia , author A. Cabot , author L. Yedra , author S. Estrad \'e , author F. Peir \'o , et al. ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep01652 journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 3 ,\ pages 1652 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/srep01652 2013

  22. [22]

    Mehdaoui , author R

    author author B. Mehdaoui , author R. P. \ Tan , author A. Meffre , author J. Carrey , author S. Lachaize , author B. Chaudret ,\ and\ author M. Respaud ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.174419 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 87 ,\ pages 174419 ( year 2013 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.87.174419 2013

  23. [23]

    Chubykalo, U

    author author O. Chubykalo, U. Nowak, R. Smirnov-Rueda, M.A. Wongsam, R.W. Chantrell and J.M. Gonzalez ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 67 ,\ pages 064422 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  24. [24]

    Nowak, R

    author author U. Nowak, R. W. Chantrell, and E. C. Kennedy ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 83 ,\ pages 163 ( year 2000 ) NoStop

    2000

  25. [25]

    Ledue , author F

    author author D. Ledue , author F. Vernay ,\ and\ author H. Kachkachi ,\ @noop journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ ( year 2026 ) ,\ note in press NoStop

    2026

  26. [26]

    Brown ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1979.1060329 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Magnetics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1196 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    author author W. Brown ,\ https://doi.org/10.1109/TMAG.1979.1060329 journal journal IEEE Transactions on Magnetics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 1196 ( year 1979 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.1979.1060329 1979

  27. [27]

    author author J. L. \ Garc \'i a-Palacios \ and\ author F. J. \ L \'a zaro ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.14937 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 58 ,\ pages 14937 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.14937 1998

  28. [28]

    author author J. L. Garcia-Palacios ,\ title On the Statics and Dynamics of Magnetoanisotropic Nanoparticles , \ in\ https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470141717.ch1 booktitle Advances in Chemical Physics ,\ Vol.\ volume 112 \ ( publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ,\ year 2007 )\ pp.\ pages 1--210 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1002/9780470141717.ch1 2007

  29. [29]

    \ D \'e jardin , author H

    author author J.-L. \ D \'e jardin , author H. Kachkachi ,\ and\ author J.-M. \ Martinez ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.2436 title Comment on ``thermal fluctuations of magnetic nanoparticles''[arxiv:1209.0298] , \ ( year 2012 ),\ https://arxiv.org/abs/1210.2436 arXiv:1210.2436 [cond-mat.mes-hall] NoStop

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  30. [30]

    author author J. M. \ Hammersley \ and\ author K. W. \ Morton ,\ https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305004100031455 journal journal Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society \ volume 52 ,\ pages 449 ( year 1956 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1017/s0305004100031455 1956

  31. [31]

    author author A. B. \ Owen ,\ https://doi.org/10.1214/07-aos548 journal journal The Annals of Statistics \ volume 36 ( year 2008 ),\ 10.1214/07-aos548 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1214/07-aos548 2008

  32. [32]

    Kubo , author M

    author author R. Kubo , author M. Toda ,\ and\ author N. Hashitsume ,\ https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-58244-8 title Statistical Physics II: Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics ,\ series Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences , Vol. volume 31 \ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Berlin, Heidelberg ,\ year 1991 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-58244-8 1991

  33. [33]

    author author W. T. \ Coffey , author D. S. F. \ Crothers , author Y. P. \ Kalmykov ,\ and\ author J. T. \ Waldron ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.51.15947 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 51 ,\ pages 15947 ( year 1995 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.51.15947 1995

  34. [34]

    Cregg, D.S.F

    author author P.J. Cregg, D.S.F. Crothers, and A.W. Wickstead ,\ @noop journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 76 ,\ pages 4900 ( year 1994 ) NoStop

    1994

  35. [35]

    Bitoh , author K

    author author T. Bitoh , author K. Ohba , author M. Takamatsu , author T. Shirane ,\ and\ author S. Chikazawa ,\ https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.64.1311 journal journal Journal of the Physical Society of Japan \ volume 64 ,\ pages 1311 ( year 1995 ) ,\ https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.64.1311 https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.64.1311 NoStop

    work page doi:10.1143/jpsj.64.1311 1995

  36. [36]

    Bitoh , author K

    author author T. Bitoh , author K. Ohba , author M. Takamatsu , author T. Shirane ,\ and\ author S. Chikazawa ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-8853(95)00572-2 journal journal J. Magn. Magn. Mater. \ volume 154 ,\ pages 59 ( year 1996 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1016/0304-8853(95)00572-2 1996

  37. [37]

    author author W. T. \ Coffey , author D. S. F. \ Crothers , author J. L. \ Dormann , author Y. P. \ Kalmykov , author E. C. \ Kennedy ,\ and\ author W. Wernsdorfer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.5655 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 80 ,\ pages 5655 ( year 1998 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.5655 1998

  38. [38]

    Vernay, Z

    author author F. Vernay, Z. Sabsabi, H. Kachkachi ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 90 ,\ pages 094416 ( year 2014 ) NoStop

    2014

  39. [39]

    author author J. L. \ Garc \' a-Palacios \ and\ author D. A. \ Garanin ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.064415 journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 70 ,\ pages 064415 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.70.064415 2004

  40. [40]

    \ D \'e jardin , author F

    author author J.-L. \ D \'e jardin , author F. Vernay ,\ and\ author H. Kachkachi ,\ @noop journal journal J. Appl. Phys. \ volume 128 ,\ pages 143901 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    2020

  41. [41]

    Jamet, W

    author author M. Jamet, W. Wernsdorfer, C. Thirion, D. Mailly, V. Dupuis, P. M \'e linon, and A. P \'e rez ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. Lett. \ volume 86 ,\ pages 4676 ( year 2001 ) NoStop

    2001

  42. [42]

    Jamet, W

    author author M. Jamet, W. Wernsdorfer, C. Thirion, V. Dupuis, P. M \'e linon, A. P \'e rez, and D. Mailly ,\ @noop journal journal Phys. Rev. B \ volume 69 ,\ pages 24401 ( year 2004 ) NoStop

    2004

  43. [43]

    \ Fortin , author C

    author author J.-P. \ Fortin , author C. Wilhelm , author J. Servais , author C. M \'e nager , author J.-C. \ Bacri ,\ and\ author F. Gazeau ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/ja067457e journal journal Journal of the American Chemical Society \ volume 129 ,\ pages 2628 ( year 2007 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/ja067457e 2007

  44. [44]

    Serantes , author R

    author author D. Serantes , author R. Chantrell , author H. Gavil \'a n , author M. d. P. \ Morales , author O. Chubykalo-Fesenko , author D. Baldomir ,\ and\ author A. Satoh ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CP05271H journal journal Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics \ volume 20 ,\ pages 30445 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/c8cp05271h 2018

  45. [45]

    Guardia , author R

    author author P. Guardia , author R. Di Corato , author L. Lartigue , author C. Wilhelm , author A. Espinosa , author M. Garcia-Hernandez , author F. Gazeau , author L. Manna ,\ and\ author T. Pellegrino ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2048137 journal journal ACS Nano \ volume 6 ,\ pages 3080 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/nn2048137 2012

  46. [46]

    de la Presa , author Y

    author author P. de la Presa , author Y. Luengo , author M. Multigner , author R. Costo , author M. P. \ Morales , author G. Rivero ,\ and\ author A. Hernando ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/jp310771p journal journal Journal of Physical Chemistry C \ volume 116 ,\ pages 25602 ( year 2012 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1021/jp310771p 2012

  47. [47]

    Brezovich ,\ @noop journal journal Med

    author author I. Brezovich ,\ @noop journal journal Med. Phys. Monogr. \ volume 16 ,\ pages 82 ( year 1988 ) NoStop

    1988

  48. [48]

    Fa \' lde , author V

    author author D. Fa \' lde , author V. Ocampo-Zalvide , author D. Serantes ,\ and\ author \`O . Iglesias ,\ https://doi.org/10.1039/D4NR02045F journal journal Nanoscale \ volume 16 ,\ pages 14319 ( year 2024 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1039/d4nr02045f 2024

  49. [49]

    Ruta , author R

    author author S. Ruta , author R. Chantrell ,\ and\ author O. Hovorka ,\ http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/srep09090 journal journal Sci. Rep. \ volume 5 ,\ pages 9090 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/srep09090 2015