pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27572 · v1 · pith:UW3W2YRCnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · ✦ hep-ph

Nature of the newly found Ω(2109)

Ta\'isa Veloso , K. P. Khemchandani , A. Martinez Torres , H. Nagahiro , A. Hosaka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 01:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords Omega resonancecoupled channelsmolecular stateBESIII experimentscattering amplitudeisoscalar baryon
0
0 comments X

The pith

A coupled-channel model generates an isoscalar 1/2^- state exactly at the mass of the new Ω^-(2109) from K* Ξ scattering.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The authors solve scattering equations for the coupled channels KΞ and K*Ξ to understand the recently observed Ω^-(2109). They obtain the lowest-order amplitudes and find that an isoscalar state with spin-parity 1/2^- appears at precisely 2109 MeV. No such states emerge for spin 3/2 or in the isovector sector. This dynamical generation suggests the resonance arises from the ar K^* Ξ interaction, and the work supplies correlation functions to test this interpretation experimentally.

Core claim

Solving the scattering equations in a coupled channel approach involving K^- Ξ^0, ar K^0 Ξ^-, K^{*-} Ξ^0, and ar K^{*0} Ξ^- produces an isoscalar state with spin-parity 1/2^- at exactly the mass of Ω^-(2109), with strong correlation to the ar K^* Ξ system.

What carries the argument

The coupled-channel scattering equations using lowest-order amplitudes from the effective interaction Lagrangian.

Load-bearing premise

The lowest-order amplitudes from the effective interaction Lagrangian and the chosen regularization scheme suffice to place the pole exactly at the experimental mass without higher-order terms or fitted parameters.

What would settle it

Finding an isovector state or a spin-3/2 state near 2109 MeV, or observing that the mass does not match when using a different regularization, would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27572 by A. Hosaka, A. Martinez Torres, H. Nagahiro, K. P. Khemchandani, Ta\'isa Veloso.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Different diagrams contributing to the lowest order amplitudes, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Modulus squared amplitudes projected on the isospin basis, with total [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Modulus squared amplitudes in the particle basis for total spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. The [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Correlation function for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Contributions from different coupled channels to the correlation function. The right panel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present model calculations to reveal the nature of the newly found $\Omega^-(2109)$ by the BESIII Collaboration, and show that the state has a strong correlation with the $\bar K^*(892)\Xi$ system. Our study is based on solving scattering equations in a coupled channel approach, which involves $K^-\Xi^0$, $\bar K^0\Xi^-$, $K^{*-}\Xi^0$, and $\bar K^{*0}\Xi^-$. We obtain the lowest order amplitudes for different spin and isospin cases and find that an isoscalar state with spin-parity $1/2^-$ is generated with precisely the same mass as $\Omega^-(2109)$. We do not find any state with total spin 3/2, nor do we find any state in the isovector sector. We determine correlation functions to encourage such an experimental study and confirm the nature of $\Omega^-(2109)$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript performs a coupled-channel scattering calculation in the KΞ and K*Ξ systems using tree-level amplitudes derived from an effective Lagrangian. It reports that an isoscalar pole with J^P=1/2^- appears at a mass exactly matching the newly observed Ω(2109), while no poles are found in the isovector sector or for total spin 3/2. Correlation functions are computed to facilitate experimental tests of the molecular interpretation.

Significance. If the reported mass coincidence is shown to be independent of parameter adjustment, the work would provide a dynamical explanation for Ω(2109) as a K*Ξ molecule and strengthen the case for molecular assignments of near-threshold baryons in the strangeness sector. The null results in other channels would constitute a testable prediction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and results on pole generation] Abstract and the section presenting the pole positions: the claim that an isoscalar 1/2^- state is generated 'with precisely the same mass as Ω^-(2109)' is the central result. The manuscript must state the numerical value of the regularization cutoff (or subtraction constant) employed and demonstrate the dependence of the pole position on variations of this parameter; without this, it is impossible to determine whether the mass match is a prediction or the result of tuning, as the pole location in such models is known to be sensitive to the regularization choice.
  2. [Scattering equation and amplitudes] The section describing the solution of the scattering equation: the calculation employs only lowest-order amplitudes. An estimate of the theoretical uncertainty arising from neglected higher-order terms (or a comparison with next-to-leading-order amplitudes) should be provided, because the exact mass match is sensitive to the dynamical input.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Model setup] The explicit form of the effective interaction Lagrangian for the relevant channels and spin-isospin projections is not displayed; including the relevant interaction terms would improve reproducibility.
  2. [Regularization] The numerical values of the subtraction constants or cutoff used for each channel should be tabulated for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments. We address each major point below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate the requested clarifications on regularization and theoretical uncertainties.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and results on pole generation] Abstract and the section presenting the pole positions: the claim that an isoscalar 1/2^- state is generated 'with precisely the same mass as Ω^-(2109)' is the central result. The manuscript must state the numerical value of the regularization cutoff (or subtraction constant) employed and demonstrate the dependence of the pole position on variations of this parameter; without this, it is impossible to determine whether the mass match is a prediction or the result of tuning, as the pole location in such models is known to be sensitive to the regularization choice.

    Authors: We agree that the regularization parameter must be specified explicitly and its effect on the pole position quantified. In the revised version we will state the numerical value of the cutoff (or subtraction constant) used in the calculation and add a discussion or supplementary figure showing the pole trajectory as this parameter is varied over a physically motivated range. This will allow readers to assess whether the mass coincidence is robust or parameter-tuned. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Scattering equation and amplitudes] The section describing the solution of the scattering equation: the calculation employs only lowest-order amplitudes. An estimate of the theoretical uncertainty arising from neglected higher-order terms (or a comparison with next-to-leading-order amplitudes) should be provided, because the exact mass match is sensitive to the dynamical input.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the calculation is performed at leading order. While a complete next-to-leading-order computation lies outside the present scope, we will add a paragraph estimating the expected size of higher-order corrections. The estimate will be based on the typical magnitude of NLO contributions reported in comparable chiral unitary studies of meson-baryon scattering and on the convergence pattern of the expansion at the relevant energies. This will provide a quantitative indication of the theoretical uncertainty attached to the reported pole position. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; pole position is an output of the coupled-channel equations rather than a fitted input

full rationale

The paper solves the Bethe-Salpeter equation with tree-level amplitudes obtained from the lowest-order effective Lagrangian in the KΞ and K*Ξ channels. The resulting T-matrix poles are reported as dynamical outputs for the chosen regularization. No equation or statement indicates that a subtraction constant or cutoff was varied until the pole mass coincided with the experimental value of Ω(2109); the mass agreement is presented as an emergent result. The absence of poles in other sectors is likewise a direct consequence of the same amplitude set and regularization. Because the central claim does not reduce to a parameter adjustment or self-citation chain that presupposes the target mass, the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model rests on standard assumptions of effective field theory for low-energy hadron interactions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • regularization cutoff or subtraction constant
    Commonly introduced to handle divergent loop integrals in the scattering equation; its value is typically chosen to reproduce observed masses or scattering lengths.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Lowest-order chiral or effective Lagrangian amplitudes accurately capture the interaction in the relevant energy range
    Invoked when the paper states it obtains the lowest order amplitudes for the coupled channels.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5713 in / 1387 out tokens · 56464 ms · 2026-06-29T01:20:20.709420+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages · 14 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Ablikim, et al., Evidence for Two Excited Ω- Hyperons, Phys

    M. Ablikim, et al., Evidence for Two Excited Ω- Hyperons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134 (13) (2025) 131903.arXiv:2411.11648,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.134.131903

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.134.131903 2025

  2. [2]

    Reviewofparticlephysics

    S. Navas, et al., Review of particle physics, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 030001.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.030001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.030001 2024

  3. [3]

    R. G. Edwards, N. Mathur, D. G. Richards, S. J. Wallace, Flavor structure of the excited baryon spectra from lattice QCD, Phys. Rev. D 87 (5) (2013) 054506.arXiv:1212.5236, doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.87.054506

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.054506 2013

  4. [4]

    Isgur, G

    N. Isgur, G. Karl, P Wave Baryons in the Quark Model, Phys. Rev. D 18 (1978) 4187. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.18.4187

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.18.4187 1978

  5. [5]

    Progress Toward Understanding Baryon Resonances

    V. Crede, W. Roberts, Progress towards understanding baryon resonances, Rept. Prog. Phys. 76 (2013) 076301.arXiv:1302.7299,doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076301

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076301 2013

  6. [6]

    A possible interpretation of the newly observed $\Omega(2012)$ state

    L.-Y. Xiao, X.-H. Zhong, Possible interpretation of the newly observed Ω(2012) state, Phys. Rev. D 98 (3) (2018) 034004.arXiv:1805.11285,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.034004

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.034004 2012

  7. [7]

    Tanabashi, K

    N. Su, H.-X. Chen, P. Gubler, A. Hosaka, Investigation on the Ω(2012) from QCD sum rules, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 034007.arXiv:2405.06958,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 110.034007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 2012

  8. [8]

    Observation of an excited $\Omega^-$ baryon

    J. Yelton, et al., Observation of an Excited Ω− Baryon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121 (5) (2018) 052003. arXiv:1805.09384,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.052003. 16

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.052003 2018

  9. [9]

    Acharya, et al., Observation of the Ω(2012) baryon at the LHC, Phys

    S. Acharya, et al., Observation of the Ω(2012) baryon at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 112 (9) (2025) 092002.arXiv:2502.18063,doi:10.1103/v4mh-3r8z

    work page doi:10.1103/v4mh-3r8z 2012

  10. [10]

    K. P. Khemchandani, H. Kaneko, H. Nagahiro, A. Hosaka, Vector meson-Baryon dynamics and generation of resonances, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 114041.arXiv:1104.0307,doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.83.114041

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  11. [11]

    K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres, H. Kaneko, H. Nagahiro, A. Hosaka, Coupling vector and pseudoscalar mesons to study baryon resonances, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 094018. arXiv:1107.0574,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.84.094018

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.84.094018 2011

  12. [12]

    Gasser, H

    J. Gasser, H. Leutwyler, Chiral Perturbation Theory to One Loop, Annals Phys. 158 (1984) 142.doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2

    work page doi:10.1016/0003-4916(84)90242-2 1984

  13. [13]

    Bando, T

    M. Bando, T. Kugo, K. Yamawaki, On the Vector Mesons as Dynamical Gauge Bosons of Hid- den Local Symmetries, Nucl. Phys. B 259 (1985) 493.doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90647-9

    work page doi:10.1016/0550-3213(85)90647-9 1985

  14. [14]

    K. P. Khemchandani, A. Mart´ ınez Torres, J. A. Oller, Hyperon resonances coupled to pseudoscalar- and vector-baryon channels, Phys. Rev. C 100 (1) (2019) 015208.arXiv: 1810.09990,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.100.015208

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevc.100.015208 2019

  15. [15]

    D. Jido, A. Hosaka, J. C. Nacher, E. Oset, A. Ramos, Magnetic moments of the Lambda(1405) and Lambda(1670) resonances, Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002) 025203.arXiv:hep-ph/0203248, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.66.025203

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.66.025203 2002

  16. [16]

    Weinberg, Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys

    S. Weinberg, Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1568–1577. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.166.1568

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.166.1568 1968

  17. [17]

    Chiral Dynamics in Nucleons and Nuclei

    V. Bernard, N. Kaiser, U.-G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics in nucleons and nuclei, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 4 (1995) 193–346.arXiv:hep-ph/9501384,doi:10.1142/S0218301395000092

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1142/s0218301395000092 1995

  18. [18]

    Ecker, Chiral perturbation theory, Prog

    G. Ecker, Chiral perturbation theory, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 35 (1995) 1–80.arXiv:hep-ph/ 9501357,doi:10.1016/0146-6410(95)00041-G

    work page doi:10.1016/0146-6410(95)00041-g 1995

  19. [19]

    On the spin, parity and nature of the $\Xi(1620)$ resonance

    A. Ramos, E. Oset, C. Bennhold, On the spin, parity and nature of the Xi(1620) resonance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 252001.arXiv:nucl-th/0204044,doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett. 89.252001

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevlett 2002

  20. [20]

    Kawarabayashi, M

    K. Kawarabayashi, M. Suzuki, Partially conserved axial vector current and the decays of vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16 (1966) 255.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.16.255

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.16.255 1966

  21. [21]

    Riazuddin, Fayyazuddin, Algebra of current components and decay widths of rho and K* mesons, Phys. Rev. 147 (1966) 1071–1073.doi:10.1103/PhysRev.147.1071. 17

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.147.1071 1966

  22. [22]

    F and D Values with Explicit Flavor Symmetry Breaking and \Delta s Contents of Nucleons

    T. Yamanishi, F and D values with explicit flavor symmetry breaking and Delta s contents of nucleons, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 014006.arXiv:0705.4340,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.76. 014006

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.76 2007

  23. [23]

    K. P. Khemchandani, A. Mart´ ınez Torres, A. Hosaka, H. Nagahiro, F. S. Navarra, M. Nielsen, Why Ξ(1690) and Ξ(2120) are so narrow?, Phys. Rev. D 97 (3) (2018) 034005.arXiv: 1608.07086,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.034005

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.034005 2018

  24. [24]

    J. A. Oller, U. G. Meissner, Chiral dynamics in the presence of bound states: Kaon nucleon interactions revisited, Phys. Lett. B 500 (2001) 263–272.arXiv:hep-ph/0011146,doi:10. 1016/S0370-2693(01)00078-8

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  25. [25]

    E. Oset, A. Ramos, Nonperturbative chiral approach to s wave anti-K N interactions, Nucl. Phys. A 635 (1998) 99–120.arXiv:nucl-th/9711022,doi:10.1016/S0375-9474(98) 00170-5

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1016/s0375-9474(98 1998

  26. [26]

    Origin of resonances in the chiral unitary approach

    T. Hyodo, D. Jido, A. Hosaka, Origin of the resonances in the chiral unitary approach, Phys. Rev. C 78 (2008) 025203.arXiv:0803.2550,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.78.025203

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc.78.025203 2008

  27. [27]

    Compositeness of dynamically generated states in a chiral unitary approach

    T. Hyodo, D. Jido, A. Hosaka, Compositeness of dynamically generated states in a chiral uni- tary approach, Phys. Rev. C 85 (2012) 015201.arXiv:1108.5524,doi:10.1103/PhysRevC. 85.015201

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevc 2012

  28. [28]

    K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres, H. Nagahiro, A. Hosaka, Role of vector and pseu- doscalar mesons in understanding 1/2 −N ∗ and ∆ resonances, Phys. Rev. D 88 (11) (2013) 114016.arXiv:1307.8420,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.88.114016

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.114016 2013

  29. [29]

    Liu, Y.-W

    M.-Z. Liu, Y.-W. Pan, Z.-W. Liu, T.-W. Wu, J.-X. Lu, L.-S. Geng, Three ways to decipher the nature of exotic hadrons: Multiplets, three-body hadronic molecules, and correlation functions, Phys. Rept. 1108 (2025) 1–108.arXiv:2404.06399,doi:10.1016/j.physrep. 2024.12.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep 2025

  30. [30]

    Agat˜ ao, P

    B. Agat˜ ao, P. Brand˜ ao, A. Mart´ ınez Torres, K. P. Khemchandani, L. M. Abreu, E. Oset, Correlation functions forn ¯Ds1(2460) andn ¯Ds1(2536), Eur. Phys. J. C 85 (10) (2025) 1136. arXiv:2508.05825,doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14838-y

    work page doi:10.1140/epjc/s10052-025-14838-y 2025

  31. [31]

    Vidana, A

    I. Vidana, A. Feijoo, M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, E. Oset, Femtoscopic correlation function for the Tcc(3875)+ state, Phys. Lett. B 846 (2023) 138201.arXiv:2303.06079,doi:10.1016/ j.physletb.2023.138201. 18

    arXiv 2023

  32. [32]

    Feijoo, L

    A. Feijoo, L. R. Dai, L. M. Abreu, E. Oset, Correlation function for the Tbb state: Determi- nation of the binding, scattering lengths, effective ranges, and molecular probabilities, Phys. Rev. D 109 (1) (2024) 016014.arXiv:2309.00444,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.109.016014

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.109.016014 2024

  33. [33]

    Albaladejo, J

    M. Albaladejo, J. Nieves, E. Ruiz-Arriola, Femtoscopic signatures of the lightest S-wave scalar open-charm mesons, Phys. Rev. D 108 (1) (2023) 014020.arXiv:2304.03107,doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.108.014020

    arXiv 2023

  34. [34]

    K. P. Khemchandani, L. M. Abreu, A. Martinez Torres, F. S. Navarra, Can a femtoscopic correlation function shed light on the nature of the lightest charm axial mesons?, Phys. Rev. D 110 (3) (2024) 036008.arXiv:2312.11811,doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.036008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.036008 2024

  35. [35]

    L. M. Abreu, P. Gubler, K. P. Khemchandani, A. Martinez Torres, A. Hosaka, A study of theϕN correlation function, Phys. Lett. B 860 (2025) 139175.arXiv:2409.05170,doi: 10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139175

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2024.139175 2025

  36. [36]

    Liu, Z.-W

    H.-N. Liu, Z.-W. Liu, L. Abreu, L.-S. Geng, Traces of theX(3960) state in the femtoscopic D+ s D− s correlations, Phys. Rev. D 113 (11) (2026) 114005.arXiv:2511.19098,doi:10.1103/ l3xr-phbj. 19

    arXiv 2026