Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 2 minor 53 references

LXD-SLAM: LiDAR+X Dense SLAM with $\sum_{i=0}^{5}C_5^i$ Configurable Sensor Combinations

T0 review · 1 major / 2 minor · reviewed 2026-06-29 · grok-4.3

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A single Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter unifies LiDAR-centered SLAM across any of 32 sensor combinations using Gaussian process sub-meshes for dense mapping.

desk verdict LXD-SLAM offers a modular multi-sensor SLAM with one unified filter and GP sub-meshes, but the consistency claim across all 32 combos lacks visible support. read the letter →

arxiv 2606.27811 v1 pith:XQAS27B2 submitted 2026-06-26 cs.RO

Zhong Wang , Lin Zhang , Linfei Li , Ying Shen , Shaoming Zhang , Pengcheng Shi , Shengjie Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.RO
keywords SLAMmulti-sensorfusionLiDARdensemappingerror-stateKalmanfilterGaussianprocessloopclosureodometry
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper introduces LXD-SLAM as a modular framework that centers on 3D LiDAR and supports plug-and-play addition of camera, IMU, wheel encoder, or GNSS sensors in up to 32 combinations. It relies on one Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter that uses adaptive hierarchical prediction together with point-to-mesh and reprojection error updates, while representing the scene through continuous multi-layered Gaussian process sub-meshes that allow fast ray-to-mesh depth recovery. Global consistency comes from an Extended Scan Context descriptor derived from those sub-meshes and a hybrid pose graph with bidirectional PnP loop closure. If the approach holds, platforms could switch sensor suites without rewriting the core estimator yet still produce globally consistent dense meshes at real-time rates.

What carries the argument

Unified Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter that performs point-to-mesh and reprojection error minimization on continuous multi-layered Gaussian process sub-meshes, allowing the same estimator to operate across all sensor combinations.

What would settle it

Run the system on a public dataset or real-world sequence using a sensor combination where the filter diverges or the produced mesh shows large drift compared with a specialized single-sensor method, even when all described updates are active.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

LXD-SLAM is a unified multi-sensor fusion SLAM system built around 3D LiDAR that accepts any combination of camera, IMU, wheel encoder, and GNSS inputs through a single Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter. The filter applies adaptive hierarchical prediction and minimizes point-to-mesh distances plus visual reprojection errors at each update. The environment is modeled with continuous multi-layered Gaussian process sub-meshes that support efficient ray-to-mesh depth recovery for visual features. Global consistency is maintained by an Extended Scan Context descriptor extracted from the sub-meshes and a hybrid pose graph that incorporates bidirectional PnP optimization for multi-modal loop clos

Load-bearing premise

One Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter stays mathematically consistent and numerically stable for every one of the 32 sensor combinations without needing extra per-combination tuning or degeneracy fixes.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any of the 32 sensor combinations can be used without redesigning the core estimation pipeline.
  • The same system produces high-fidelity globally consistent dense meshes at real-time rates.
  • Loop closure remains robust across modalities through Extended Scan Context descriptors and bidirectional PnP.
  • Depth recovery for visual features stays efficient via ray-to-mesh queries on the Gaussian process sub-meshes.
  • Odometry accuracy matches or exceeds that of specialized single-sensor solutions on public benchmarks.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A single codebase could support many different robot platforms by swapping only the sensor inputs rather than the estimator.
  • The Gaussian process sub-mesh representation might allow incremental addition of new sensor types beyond the five described if the filter equations are extended accordingly.
  • Real-time dense mesh output could reduce the need for separate mapping pipelines in applications that require both localization and surface reconstruction.
  • The approach could be tested on sequences containing sensor dropouts to check whether the adaptive prediction still prevents filter divergence.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. LXD-SLAM is a multi-sensor SLAM framework centered on 3D LiDAR that supports plug-and-play integration of Camera, IMU, Wheel Encoder, and GNSS sensors for all 32 combinations. It uses a single Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter with adaptive hierarchical prediction and point-to-mesh/reprojection updates, continuous multi-layered Gaussian Process sub-meshes for mapping and ray-to-mesh depth recovery, an Extended Scan Context descriptor, and Bidirectional PnP optimization for hybrid pose-graph loop closure. The paper claims that the system matches or exceeds specialized state-of-the-art odometry methods on public datasets and real-world experiments while producing high-fidelity, globally consistent dense meshes in real time.

Significance. If the unified filter maintains mathematical consistency and numerical stability across all sensor subsets without per-combination tuning, the work would offer a meaningful advance in modular SLAM by enabling a single codebase to achieve competitive performance on diverse platforms while supporting real-time dense mapping.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract / filter description] Abstract / filter description: the central claim that one Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter remains mathematically consistent and numerically stable for every one of the 32 sensor combinations (including degenerate cases such as camera-only or IMU+wheel) rests on unshown properties; no observability analysis, covariance propagation derivation, Jacobian conditioning bounds, or degeneracy-handling logic is supplied to demonstrate that the same prediction/update equations preserve positive-definiteness and well-conditioned updates uniformly.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract states 'Error-Sate' Kalman Filter; this should be corrected to 'Error-State'.
  2. The abstract asserts 'extensive evaluations' and performance parity/superiority but supplies no quantitative metrics, tables, or ablation summaries; a brief indication of key error figures or datasets would improve clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on the mathematical foundations of the unified filter. We address the single major comment below and will incorporate the requested analysis in the revision.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / filter description] Abstract / filter description: the central claim that one Iterative Error-State Kalman Filter remains mathematically consistent and numerically stable for every one of the 32 sensor combinations (including degenerate cases such as camera-only or IMU+wheel) rests on unshown properties; no observability analysis, covariance propagation derivation, Jacobian conditioning bounds, or degeneracy-handling logic is supplied to demonstrate that the same prediction/update equations preserve positive-definiteness and well-conditioned updates uniformly.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript lacks an explicit observability analysis, covariance propagation derivation, Jacobian conditioning bounds, and detailed degeneracy-handling logic for all 32 combinations. This omission weakens the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection (Section IV-C) that (1) provides an observability analysis for representative sensor subsets including the degenerate cases of camera-only and IMU+wheel, (2) derives the key covariance propagation steps under the adaptive hierarchical prediction, (3) reports conditioning bounds on the Jacobians for the point-to-mesh and reprojection updates, and (4) describes the explicit degeneracy-handling mechanisms (adaptive covariance inflation and selective measurement gating) that preserve positive-definiteness across combinations. These additions will be supported by both theoretical arguments and numerical verification on the public datasets. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity; claims rest on external evaluations without self-referential reductions

full rationale

The provided abstract and text contain no equations, derivations, or parameter fits that reduce by construction to their own inputs. The unified IESKF is asserted as mathematically consistent across combinations, but this is presented as a design choice supported by evaluations on public datasets and real-world experiments rather than any internal self-definition, fitted prediction, or self-citation chain. No load-bearing uniqueness theorems, ansatzes, or renamings appear. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 0 assumptions · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities cannot be extracted; the framework implicitly assumes standard sensor models and GP properties hold across combinations.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of LXD-SLAM: LiDAR+X Dense SLAM with $\sum_{i=0}^{5}C_5^i$ Configurable Sensor Combinations." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XQAS27B2

@misc{pith2026260627811,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: LXD-SLAM: LiDAR+X Dense SLAM with $\sum_i=0^5C_5^i$ Configurable Sensor Combinations},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XQAS27B2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2606.27811}
}
read the original abstract

Simultaneous Localization and Mapping (SLAM) is essential for autonomous systems, yet achieving reliable, globally consistent pose estimation and dense mapping in complex environments remains challenging due to geometric degeneracy and sensor drift. While multi-sensor fusion addresses these issues, existing systems often lack the modularity to adapt to diverse platforms and rely on mathematically inconsistent fusion or suboptimal map representations. To address these limitations, we propose LXD-SLAM (LiDAR+X Dense SLAM), a highly versatile and unified multi-sensor fusion framework. Centered around 3D LiDAR, our system allows for the plug-and-play integration of LiDAR, Camera, IMU, Wheel Encoder, and GNSS, supporting up to 32 distinct sensor combinations. We employ a mathematically unified Iterative Error-Sate Kalman Filter with an adaptive hierarchical prediction strategy and an update step that minimizes point-to-mesh distances and visual reprojection errors. To support this, the environment is modeled using continuous multi-layered Gaussian Process (GP) sub-meshes, which enables efficient ray-to-mesh depth recovery for visual features. For global consistency, we introduce an Extended Scan Context (ESC) descriptor derived from the GP sub-meshes alongside a Bidirectional PnP optimization for robust multi-modal loop closure within a hybrid pose graph. Extensive evaluations on public datasets and real-world experiments demonstrate that LXD-SLAM matches or exceeds state-of-the-art specialized odometry solutions across various configurations while generating high-fidelity, globally consistent dense meshes in real-time. The relevant codes and data will be made available at https://github.com/peterWon/LXD-SLAM upon publication.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.27811 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. System Overview. The proposed LXD-SLAM framework infrastructure is anchored by a primary LiDAR and architected to support the tight-coupled fusion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Hierarchical map organization. The continuous 3D workspace is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Visual feature lifecycle topology. Features are tracked across sliding [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The device is equipped with a Livox LiDAR, an industrial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Self-developed Device. comparison, all estimated trajectories are aligned with the ground truth using the Umeyama algorithm, and the absolute trajectory error (ATE) Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) is adopted as the primary metric for localization fidelity. 1) LiDAR-Camer…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Globally Consistent Dense Mesh Construction in Large-Scale Scenes. Top: Dense mapping results of SLAMesh on KITTI Sequence-00 and Sequence-05. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Globally consistent color mapping in campus environments. Leveraging backend loop closure detection and constraint construction, LXD-SLAM builds a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: With the aid of GNSS, large-scale mapping with low drift is achieved. The fusion of GNSS signals in the backend enables the system to maintain both high [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Resulting maps under degeneration. Top: maps and trajectories produced [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Ablation studies on the extended scan context and visual loop closure [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Present and future of SLAM in extreme environments: The DARPA SubT challenge,

    K. Ebadi, L. Bernreiter, H. Biggie, G. Catt, Y. Chang, A. Chatterjee, C. E. Denniston, S.-P. Desch ˆenes, K. Harlow, S. Khattak, L. Nogueira, M. Palieri, P. Petr ´aˇcek, M. Petrl´ık, A. Reinke, V. Kr´atk´ y, S. Zhao, A.-a. Agha-mohammadi, K. Alexis, C. Heckman, K. Khosoussi, N. Kottege, B. Morrell, M. Hutter, F. Pauling, F. Pomerleau, M. Saska, S. Scherer...

    2024

  2. [2]

    Tightly coupled 3D lidar inertial odometry and mapping,

    H. Ye, Y. Chen, and M. Liu, “Tightly coupled 3D lidar inertial odometry and mapping,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3144–3150, 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    LIO-SAM: Tightly-coupled lidar inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping,

    T. Shan, B. Englot, D. Meyers, W. Wang, C. Ratti, and D. Rus, “LIO-SAM: Tightly-coupled lidar inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping,” in IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5135–5142, 2020

    2020

  4. [4]

    LIO-EKF: High frequency lidar-inertial odometry using extended kalman filters,

    Y. Wu, T. Guadagnino, L. Wiesmann, L. Klingbeil, C. Stachniss, and H. Kuhlmann, “LIO-EKF: High frequency lidar-inertial odometry using extended kalman filters,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 13741–13747, 2024

    2024

  5. [5]

    LINS: A lidar-inertial state estimator for robust and efficient navigation,

    C. Qin, H. Ye, C. E. Pranata, J. Han, S. Zhang, and M. Liu, “LINS: A lidar-inertial state estimator for robust and efficient navigation,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 8899–8906, IEEE, 2020

    2020

  6. [6]

    FAST-LIO2: Fast direct lidar-inertial odometry,

    W. Xu, Y. Cai, D. He, J. Lin, and F. Zhang, “FAST-LIO2: Fast direct lidar-inertial odometry,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2053–2073, 2022

  7. [7]

    Faster-LIO: Lightweight tightly coupled lidar-inertial odometry using parallel sparse incremental voxels,

    C. Bai, T. Xiao, Y. Chen, H. Wang, F. Zhang, and X. Gao, “Faster-LIO: Lightweight tightly coupled lidar-inertial odometry using parallel sparse incremental voxels,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 4861–4868, 2022

    2022

  8. [8]

    Visual-lidar odometry and mapping: low-drift, robust, and fast,

    J. Zhang and S. Singh, “Visual-lidar odometry and mapping: low-drift, robust, and fast,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 2174–2181, 2015

    2015

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    LVI-SAM: Tightly-coupled lidar-visual-inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping,

    T. Shan, B. Englot, C. Ratti, and D. Rus, “LVI-SAM: Tightly-coupled lidar-visual-inertial odometry via smoothing and mapping,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5692–5698, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    LIC-Fusion: Lidar- inertial-camera odometry,

    X. Zuo, P. Geneva, W. Lee, Y. Liu, and G. Huang, “LIC-Fusion: Lidar- inertial-camera odometry,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5848–5854, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    R 2LIVE: A robust, real-time, lidar-inertial-visual tightly-coupled state estimator and mapping,

    J. Lin, C. Zheng, W. Xu, and F. Zhang, “R 2LIVE: A robust, real-time, lidar-inertial-visual tightly-coupled state estimator and mapping,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 7469–7476, 2021

    2021

  4. [12]

    R3LIVE: A robust, real-time, RGB-colored, LiDAR- inertial-visual tightly-coupled state estimation and mapping package,

    J. Lin and F. Zhang, “R3LIVE: A robust, real-time, RGB-colored, LiDAR- inertial-visual tightly-coupled state estimation and mapping package,” in IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 10672– 10678, 2022

    2022

  5. [13]

    FAST-LIVO: Fast and tightly-coupled sparse-direct LiDAR-inertial-visual odometry,

    C. Zheng, Q. Zhu, W. Xu, X. Liu, Q. Guo, and F. Zhang, “FAST-LIVO: Fast and tightly-coupled sparse-direct LiDAR-inertial-visual odometry,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4003–4009, 2022

    2022

  6. [14]

    FAST-LIVO2: Fast, direct lidar–inertial–visual odometry,

    C. Zheng, W. Xu, Z. Zou, T. Hua, C. Yuan, D. He, B. Zhou, Z. Liu, J. Lin, F. Zhu, Y. Ren, R. Wang, F. Meng, and F. Zhang, “FAST-LIVO2: Fast, direct lidar–inertial–visual odometry,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 41, pp. 326–346, 2025

    2025

  7. [15]

    Robust odometry and mapping for multi-lidar systems with online extrinsic calibration,

    J. Jiao, H. Ye, Y. Zhu, and M. Liu, “Robust odometry and mapping for multi-lidar systems with online extrinsic calibration,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 351–371, 2022

    2022

  8. [16]

    LIWO: LiDAR-inertial-wheel odometry,

    Z. Yuan, F. Lang, T. Xu, and X. Yang, “LIWO: LiDAR-inertial-wheel odometry,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1481–1488, 2023

    2023

  9. [17]

    VINS-Fusion: A General Optimization- Based Framework for Multi-Sensor State Estimation,

    T. Qin, S. Cao, and S. Shen, “VINS-Fusion: A General Optimization- Based Framework for Multi-Sensor State Estimation,”arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.03642, 2019

    1901 arXiv

  10. [18]

    GVINS: Tightly coupled gnss–visual–inertial fusion for smooth and consistent state estimation,

    S. Cao, X. Lu, and S. Shen, “GVINS: Tightly coupled gnss–visual–inertial fusion for smooth and consistent state estimation,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 2004–2021, 2022

    2004

  11. [19]

    LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in real- time,

    J. Zhang and S. Singh, “LOAM: Lidar odometry and mapping in real- time,” inRobotics: Science and Systems, pp. 1–9, 2014

    2014

  12. [20]

    LeGO-LOAM: Lightweight and ground-optimized lidar odometry and mapping on variable terrain,

    T. Shan and B. Englot, “LeGO-LOAM: Lightweight and ground-optimized lidar odometry and mapping on variable terrain,” inIEEE/RSJ Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4758–4765, 2018

    2018

  13. [21]

    F-LOAM : Fast lidar odometry and mapping,

    H. Wang, C. Wang, C.-L. Chen, and L. Xie, “F-LOAM : Fast lidar odometry and mapping,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4390–4396, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    FAST-LIO: A fast, robust lidar-inertial odometry package by tightly-coupled iterated kalman filter,

    W. Xu and F. Zhang, “FAST-LIO: A fast, robust lidar-inertial odometry package by tightly-coupled iterated kalman filter,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3317–3324, 2021

    2021

  15. [23]

    Point-LIO: Robust high-bandwidth light detection and ranging inertial odometry,

    D. He, W. Xu, N. Chen, F. Kong, C. Yuan, and F. Zhang, “Point-LIO: Robust high-bandwidth light detection and ranging inertial odometry,” Advanced Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, no. 7, p. 2200459, 2023

    2023

  16. [24]

    DEMO: Depth enhanced monocular odometry,

    J. Zhang, M. Kaess, and S. Singh, “DEMO: Depth enhanced monocular odometry,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4975–4981, Sep 2014

    2014

  17. [25]

    LIC-Fusion 2.0: Lidar-inertial-camera odometry with sliding-window plane-feature tracking,

    X. Zuo, Y. Yang, P. Geneva, J. Lv, Y. Liu, G. Huang, and M. Pollefeys, “LIC-Fusion 2.0: Lidar-inertial-camera odometry with sliding-window plane-feature tracking,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intel- ligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5112–5119, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    VINS-Mono: A robust and versatile monocular visual-inertial state estimator,

    T. Qin, P. Li, and S. Shen, “VINS-Mono: A robust and versatile monocular visual-inertial state estimator,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 1004–1020, 2018

    2018

  19. [27]

    Scalability in perception for autonomous driving: Waymo open dataset,

    P. Sun, H. Kretzschmar, X. Dotiwalla, A. Chouard, V. Patnaik, P. Tsui, J. Guo, Y. Zhou, Y. Chai, B. Caine, V. Vasudevan, W. Han, J. Ngiam, H. Zhao, A. Timofeev, S. Ettinger, M. Krivokon, A. Gao, A. Joshi, Y. Zhang, J. Shlens, Z. Chen, and D. Anguelov, “Scalability in perceptio...

    2020

  20. [28]

    nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving,

    H. Caesar, V. Bankiti, A. H. Lang, S. Vora, V. E. Liong, Q. Xu, A. Krishnan, Y. Pan, G. Baldan, and O. Beijbom, “nuscenes: A multimodal dataset for autonomous driving,” inIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 11618–11628, 2020

    2020

  21. [29]

    KITTI-360: A novel dataset and bench- marks for urban scene understanding in 2D and 3D,

    Y. Liao, J. Xie, and A. Geiger, “ KITTI-360: A novel dataset and bench- marks for urban scene understanding in 2D and 3D,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, pp. 3292–3310, Mar. 2023

    2023

  22. [30]

    MLS-SLAM: Multi-level submap guided lidar SLAM,

    F. Shang, W. Yu, K. Wang, L. Wang, W. Liu, W. Yang, W. Lu, G. Wang, and S. Wang, “MLS-SLAM: Multi-level submap guided lidar SLAM,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1058–1065, 2026

    2026

  23. [31]

    MLIOM-AB: Multi-lidar-inertial-odometry and mapping for autonomous buses,

    T. Song, Y. Zheng, S. He, Z. Xiong, P. Wang, and X. Wu, “MLIOM-AB: Multi-lidar-inertial-odometry and mapping for autonomous buses,”IEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 24, no. 17, pp. 28036–28048, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    Multi-LIO: A lightweight multiple lidar-inertial odometry system,

    Q. Chen, G. Li, X. Xue, and J. Pu, “Multi-LIO: A lightweight multiple lidar-inertial odometry system,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 13748–13754, 2024. WANGet al.: LXD-SLAM: LIDAR+X DENSE SLAM WITH Í5 𝑖=0 𝐶𝑖 5 CONFIGURABLE SENSOR COMBINATIONS 17

    2024

  25. [33]

    VINS on wheels,

    K. J. Wu, C. X. Guo, G. Georgiou, and S. I. Roumeliotis, “VINS on wheels,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 5155–5162, 2017

    2017

  26. [34]

    Efficient surfel-based SLAM using 3D laser range data in urban environments,

    J. Behley and C. Stachniss, “Efficient surfel-based SLAM using 3D laser range data in urban environments,” inRobotics: Science and Systems, 2018

    2018

  27. [35]

    SuMa++: Efficient lidar-based semantic SLAM,

    X. Chen, A. Milioto, E. Palazzolo, P. Gigu`ere, J. Behley, and C. Stachniss, “SuMa++: Efficient lidar-based semantic SLAM,” inIEEE/RSJ Interna- tional Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 4530–4537, 2019

    2019

  28. [36]

    Efficient and probabilistic adaptive voxel mapping for accurate online lidar odometry,

    C. Yuan, W. Xu, X. Liu, X. Hong, and F. Zhang, “Efficient and probabilistic adaptive voxel mapping for accurate online lidar odometry,” IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 8518–8525, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    BALM: Bundle adjustment for lidar mapping,

    Z. Liu and F. Zhang, “BALM: Bundle adjustment for lidar mapping,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3184–3191, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    NICE-SLAM: Neural implicit scalable encoding for SLAM,

    Z. Zhu, S. Peng, V. Larsson, W. Xu, H. Bao, Z. Cui, M. R. Oswald, and M. Pollefeys, “NICE-SLAM: Neural implicit scalable encoding for SLAM,” inIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 12776–12786, 2022

    2022

  31. [39]

    Gaussian splatting SLAM,

    H. Matsuki, R. Murai, P. H. J. Kelly, and A. J. Davison, “Gaussian splatting SLAM,” inIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 18039–18048, 2024

    2024

  32. [40]

    GP-SLAM+: real-time 3D lidar SLAM based on improved regionalized Gaussian process map reconstruction,

    J. Ruan, B. Li, Y. Wang, and Z. Fang, “GP-SLAM+: real-time 3D lidar SLAM based on improved regionalized Gaussian process map reconstruction,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 5171–5178, 2020

    2020

  33. [41]

    SLAMesh: Real-time lidar simul- taneous localization and meshing,

    J. Ruan, B. Li, Y. Wang, and Y. Sun, “SLAMesh: Real-time lidar simul- taneous localization and meshing,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3546–3552, 2023

    2023

  34. [42]

    Symbolic representation and toolkit development of iterated error-state extended kalman filters on manifolds,

    D. He, W. Xu, and F. Zhang, “Symbolic representation and toolkit development of iterated error-state extended kalman filters on manifolds,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 70, no. 12, pp. 12533– 12544, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Fast ray-tracing of rectilinear volume data using distance transforms,

    M. Sramek and A. Kaufman, “Fast ray-tracing of rectilinear volume data using distance transforms,”IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 236–252, 2000

    2000

  36. [44]

    Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography,

    M. A. Fischler and R. C. Bolles, “Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography,”Communications of the ACM, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 381–395, 1981

    1981

  37. [45]

    NTU VIRAL: A Visual-Inertial-Ranging-Lidar Dataset, from an Aerial Vehicle Viewpoint,

    T. M. Nguyen, S. Yuan, M. Cao, Y. Lyu, T. H. Nguyen, and L. Xie, “NTU VIRAL: A Visual-Inertial-Ranging-Lidar Dataset, from an Aerial Vehicle Viewpoint,”International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 270–280, 2021

    2021

  38. [46]

    FusionPortableV2: A Unified Multi-Sensor Dataset for Generalized SLAM Across Diverse Platforms and Scalable Environments,

    H. Wei, J. Jiao, X. Hu, J. Yu, X. . Xie, and M. Liu, “FusionPortableV2: A Unified Multi-Sensor Dataset for Generalized SLAM Across Diverse Platforms and Scalable Environments,”International Journal of Robotics Research, vol. 44, no. 7, pp. 1093–1116, 2025

    2025

  39. [47]

    Are we ready for autonomous driving? the KITTI vision benchmark suite,

    A. Geiger, P. Lenz, and R. Urtasun, “Are we ready for autonomous driving? the KITTI vision benchmark suite,” inIEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 3354–3361, 2012

    2012

  40. [48]

    SDV-LOAM: Semi- direct visual–lidar odometry and mapping,

    Z. Yuan, Q. Wang, K. Cheng, T. Hao, and X. Yang, “SDV-LOAM: Semi- direct visual–lidar odometry and mapping,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 45, no. 9, pp. 11203–11220, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    D-LIOM: Tightly-coupled direct lidar-inertial odometry and mapping,

    Z. Wang, L. Zhang, Y. Shen, and Y. Zhou, “D-LIOM: Tightly-coupled direct lidar-inertial odometry and mapping,”IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, vol. 25, pp. 3905–3920, 2023

    2023

  42. [50]

    Ct-LVI: A framework toward continuous-time laser-visual-inertial odometry and mapping,

    Z. Wang, L. Zhang, S. Zhao, and Y. Zhou, “Ct-LVI: A framework toward continuous-time laser-visual-inertial odometry and mapping,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 4378–4391, 2024

    2024

  43. [51]

    Direct lidar-inertial odometry: Lightweight LIO with continuous-time motion correction,

    K. Chen, R. Nemiroff, and B. T. Lopez, “Direct lidar-inertial odometry: Lightweight LIO with continuous-time motion correction,” inIEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3983–3989, 2023

    2023

  44. [52]

    SR-LIVO: Lidar- inertial-visual odometry and mapping with sweep reconstruction,

    Z. Yuan, J. Deng, R. Ming, F. Lang, and X. Yang, “SR-LIVO: Lidar- inertial-visual odometry and mapping with sweep reconstruction,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 5110–5117, 2024

    2024

  45. [53]

    Scan Context++: Structural place recogni- tion robust to rotation and lateral variations in urban environments,

    G. Kim, S. Choi, and A. Kim, “Scan Context++: Structural place recogni- tion robust to rotation and lateral variations in urban environments,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1856–1874, 2022

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed June 29, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.