pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28022 · v1 · pith:4HPEIGWFnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph

FMO-xTB: Fragment molecular orbital method with GFN1-xTB for large-scale quantum-mechanical simulations

Richard Einsele , Roland Mitric This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-29 02:10 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph
keywords fragment molecular orbitalextended tight-bindingGFN1-xTBlarge-scale quantum chemistryanalytic gradientsnear-linear scalingorganic semiconductorsbiomolecular systems
0
0 comments X

The pith

FMO-xTB pairs the fragment molecular orbital method with GFN1-xTB to compute energies and gradients for systems of tens of thousands of atoms with near-linear scaling.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that both two-body and three-body fragment expansions combined with the GFN1-xTB tight-binding model reproduce full-system reference energies to high accuracy while delivering near-linear computational cost. Analytic gradients are derived that include the response term from the embedding potential, and the hybrid orbital projection treatment handles covalent bond cuts for biomolecules. Benchmarks on water clusters, anthracene aggregates, pentacene supercells, polyalanine helices, and B-DNA show deviations in the 10^-4 to millihartree range, with effective scaling exponents between 1.06 and 1.28. This combination inherits GFN1-xTB's coverage of all spd-block elements up to radon and is implemented to run a 23,760-atom pentacene calculation in minutes on one node.

Core claim

FMO3-xTB reproduces non-fragmented xTB energies within 10^-4 Hartree for organic semiconductor aggregates and within 10^-6 Hartree to millihartree for covalently fragmented polyalanine and B-DNA, while the method as a whole scales with exponents 1.06-1.28 and supports fully analytic energy-plus-gradient evaluations on systems containing more than 20,000 atoms.

What carries the argument

The three-body fragment molecular orbital expansion (FMO3) with GFN1-xTB, using hybrid orbital projection to treat covalent bond fragmentation and self-consistent embedding, supplies the central mechanism that reduces cubic scaling to near-linear while preserving analytic gradients.

If this is right

  • Energy and gradient evaluations become feasible for molecular dynamics of organic semiconductor crystals and biomolecular complexes with 20,000+ atoms on single nodes.
  • The same framework extends element coverage to all spd-block atoms up to radon without requiring atom-pair-specific parameters.
  • Parallel execution over multiple CPU cores further reduces wall time for supercell calculations that previously scaled cubically.
  • Routine simulation of systems that were previously accessible only with classical force fields now becomes possible at the quantum-mechanical level.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The reported scaling suggests that even larger assemblies, such as protein-ligand complexes or extended material interfaces, could be treated directly rather than through embedding approximations.
  • Because gradients are analytic, the method can be dropped into existing molecular-dynamics packages without additional finite-difference overhead.
  • The millihartree-level accuracy for B-DNA opens a route to quantum-mechanical sampling of conformational changes in nucleic acids that were previously limited to smaller model systems.

Load-bearing premise

The hybrid orbital projection scheme for cutting covalent bonds adds only errors small enough to stay inside the reported millihartree accuracy window for the tested alpha-helices and DNA structures.

What would settle it

Compute the FMO3-xTB energy and gradient for a covalently bonded system larger than the B-DNA test case and compare directly to a full non-fragmented GFN1-xTB reference; a deviation exceeding a few millihartree would falsify the accuracy claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28022 by Richard Einsele, Roland Mitric.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: As expected, increasing the fragment size system [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Absolute energy deviation of FMO2-xTB and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Absolute energy deviation of FMO2-xTB and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Computational scaling of the SCC wall-clock time [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of serial (solid lines) and parallel [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Signed error of the analytic gradient with re [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Wall-clock times for the analytic gradient evalu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We present the fragment molecular orbital method (FMO) combined with the GFN1-xTB extended tight-binding approach (FMO-xTB) for efficient quantum-mechanical calculations of large molecular systems. Both the two-body (FMO2) and three-body (FMO3) expansions are formulated, and fully analytic energy gradients including the response contribution from the self-consistent embedding potential are derived and implemented. The FMO-xTB method inherits the broad element coverage of GFN1-xTB, which employs element-specific rather than atom-pair-specific parameters and is parameterized for all spd-block elements up to radon(Z = 86), representing a significant practical advantage over FMO- DFTB approaches. The accuracy of FMO-xTB is systematically benchmarked against non-fragmented xTB calculations for water clusters, anthracene aggregates, and pentacene supercells. FMO3-xTB reproduces the reference energies with deviations on the order of 10^-4 Hartree for organic semiconductor systems. The covalent bond fragmentation capability using the hybrid orbital projection (HOP) boundary treatment is also implemented with fully analytic gradients and validated for polyalanine alpha-helices and B-DNA double helices, yielding FMO3-xTB energy deviations on the order of 10^-6 Hartree for polyalanine and in the millihartree range for B-DNA. Near-linear scaling is achieved with effective scaling exponents between b= 1.06 and b= 1.28, compared to cubic scaling for non-fragmented xTB. Parallelization over multiple CPU cores yields significant speed ups, and a complete energy and gradient evaluation of a pentacene supercell containing 23760 atoms is feasible within minutes on a single computing node, enabling routine molecular dynamics simulations of systems with tens of thousands of atoms. The method is implemented in the DIALECT software package.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces the FMO-xTB method, combining the fragment molecular orbital (FMO) approach with GFN1-xTB for efficient QM calculations on large systems. It formulates both FMO2 and FMO3 expansions, derives and implements fully analytic energy gradients (including response terms from the embedding potential), benchmarks FMO3-xTB energies against non-fragmented xTB on water clusters, anthracene aggregates, and pentacene supercells (deviations ~10^{-4} Ha for organic semiconductors), validates the hybrid orbital projection (HOP) for covalent fragmentation on polyalanine alpha-helices (~10^{-6} Ha) and B-DNA (~millihartree), and reports near-linear scaling (exponents 1.06-1.28) with a 23760-atom pentacene example completing in minutes.

Significance. If the accuracy and scaling claims hold, FMO-xTB would provide a practical route to routine QM-level MD on systems of tens of thousands of atoms while retaining GFN1-xTB's broad elemental coverage (all spd elements to Z=86). The independent benchmarks against full xTB calculations and the implementation of analytic gradients are notable strengths that support reproducibility and usability.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract and covalent fragmentation validation] Abstract and covalent fragmentation section: The hybrid orbital projection (HOP) treatment is validated only for polyalanine alpha-helices and B-DNA double helices. No data are provided for other covalent bond types (e.g., C-C single bonds in hydrocarbons, disulfide bonds) or branched topologies, which limits support for the claim of applicability to general large molecular systems requiring covalent fragmentation.
minor comments (2)
  1. The scaling exponents (b = 1.06 to 1.28) are reported without specifying the exact system sizes or fragmentation schemes used to obtain each value; a table or figure reference would improve clarity.
  2. The manuscript states that FMO-xTB inherits broad element coverage from GFN1-xTB, but no explicit test systems containing heavy elements (Z > 36) are mentioned in the benchmarks.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive assessment of our manuscript and the recommendation for minor revision. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and covalent fragmentation validation] Abstract and covalent fragmentation section: The hybrid orbital projection (HOP) treatment is validated only for polyalanine alpha-helices and B-DNA double helices. No data are provided for other covalent bond types (e.g., C-C single bonds in hydrocarbons, disulfide bonds) or branched topologies, which limits support for the claim of applicability to general large molecular systems requiring covalent fragmentation.

    Authors: We agree that the HOP validation is restricted to polyalanine α-helices and B-DNA, which primarily feature peptide and phosphodiester linkages. These systems were chosen because they represent the most common use cases for covalent fragmentation in large biomolecules, the primary target application of FMO-xTB. While the HOP procedure itself is a standard, transferable technique from the FMO literature and our implementation follows the established formulation without system-specific adjustments, we acknowledge that explicit benchmarks on additional bond types (e.g., alkane C–C or disulfides) and branched topologies would strengthen the generality claim. Because the current manuscript already demonstrates sub-millihartree accuracy on the tested covalent cases together with fully analytic gradients, we do not believe the limitation undermines the core technical contribution. We are prepared to insert a brief clarifying sentence in the abstract and methods section noting the scope of the HOP benchmarks if the editor considers it necessary. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; central claims rest on independent benchmarks against full xTB

full rationale

The paper formulates FMO2/FMO3-xTB by direct combination of the standard fragment molecular orbital method with the existing GFN1-xTB Hamiltonian, derives analytic gradients from the embedding potential, and reports accuracy via explicit numerical comparison to non-fragmented reference xTB calculations on water clusters, anthracene aggregates, pentacene supercells, polyalanine, and B-DNA. No equation reduces a claimed result to a fitted parameter or self-defined quantity by construction, and no load-bearing premise is justified solely by self-citation. The HOP boundary treatment is presented as an implemented feature whose errors are measured empirically on the cited test systems rather than asserted by definition. This satisfies the default expectation of a non-circular derivation chain.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The paper relies on the pre-existing GFN1-xTB parameterization and the standard FMO many-body expansion; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The total energy can be approximated by a truncated many-body expansion over fragment energies plus interaction corrections.
    This is the foundational premise of the FMO method invoked throughout the abstract for both FMO2 and FMO3.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5879 in / 1399 out tokens · 49433 ms · 2026-06-29T02:10:23.594333+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

143 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A non-self-consistent tight-binding electronic structure potential in a polarized double-. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0137838 , language =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0137838 2023

  2. [2]

    A. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00118 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00118 2017

  3. [3]

    Divide-. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2025 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/jcc.70255 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.70255 2025

  4. [4]

    and Inostroza, Diego and Courbiere, Bastien and Guegan, Fréderic and Contreras-García, Julia and Mori, Seiji , month = feb, year =

    Fedorov, Dmitri G. and Inostroza, Diego and Courbiere, Bastien and Guegan, Fréderic and Contreras-García, Julia and Mori, Seiji , month = feb, year =. Decomposition. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01654 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c01654

  5. [5]

    Einsele, Richard and Miao, Xincheng and Philipp, Luca Nils and Mitrić, Roland , month = jul, year =. J. Phys. Chem. A , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03307 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.5c03307

  6. [6]

    Use of caps in the auxiliary basis set formulation of the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.27345 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.27345 2024

  7. [7]

    J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2024 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0231191 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0231191 2024

  8. [8]

    Nonadiabatic

    Einsele, Richard and Mitrić, Roland , month = jul, year =. Nonadiabatic. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00539 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.4c00539

  9. [9]

    Plett, Christoph and Katbashev, Abylay and Ehlert, Sebastian and Grimme, Stefan and Bursch, Markus , month = jul, year =. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , publisher =. doi:10.1039/D3CP02178E , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/d3cp02178e

  10. [10]

    Divide-and-. J. Phys. Chem. A , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.2c06965 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpca.2c06965 2023

  11. [11]

    Long-range corrected fragment molecular orbital density functional tight-binding method for excited states in large molecular systems , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2023 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0136844 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0136844 2023

  12. [12]

    Fragment molecular orbital calculations for biomolecules , volume =. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. , author =. 2022 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2021.08.010 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2021.08.010 2022

  13. [13]

    Free. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00040 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c00040 2022

  14. [14]

    Polarization energies in the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2022 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.26869 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.26869 2022

  15. [15]

    The fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding and periodic boundary conditions , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2021 , pages =. doi:10.1063/5.0039520 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0039520 2021

  16. [16]

    Analytic first and second derivatives of the energy in the fragment molecular orbital method combined with molecular mechanics , volume =. Int. J. Quantum Chem. , author =. doi:10.1002/qua.26414 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/qua.26414

  17. [17]

    The. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00108 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00108 2019

  18. [18]

    Dcdftbmd:. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.25804 , language =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.25804 2019

  19. [19]

    Adaptive frozen orbital treatment for the fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.5012935 , language =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5012935 2018

  20. [20]

    Analytic second derivatives for the efficient electrostatic embedding in the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2018 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.25360 , language =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.25360 2018

  21. [21]

    Computational. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2018 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.201709943 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/anie.201709943 2018

  22. [22]

    Three-body expansion of the fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding , volume =. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2017 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.24693 , language =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.24693 2017

  23. [23]

    Houk, K. N. and Liu, Fang , month = mar, year =. Holy. Acc. Chem. Res. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00532 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00532

  24. [24]

    The fragment molecular orbital method combined with density-functional tight-binding and the polarizable continuum model , volume =. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1039/C6CP02186G , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/c6cp02186g 2016

  25. [25]

    Analytic second derivative of the energy for density-functional tight-binding combined with the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.4959231 , language =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4959231 2016

  26. [26]

    Divide-and-. J. Phys. Chem. B , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12439 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b12439 2016

  27. [27]

    Accurate

    Raghavachari, Krishnan and Saha, Arjun , month = jun, year =. Accurate. Chem. Rev. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/cr500606e , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/cr500606e

  28. [28]

    Large-. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02490 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02490 2015

  29. [29]

    Third-order density-functional tight-binding combined with the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. Chem. Phys. Lett. , author =. 2015 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2015.07.022 , language =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2015.07.022 2015

  30. [30]

    Electron-correlated fragment-molecular-orbital calculations for biomolecular and nano systems , volume =

    Tanaka, Shigenori and Mochizuki, Yuji and Komeiji, Yuto and Okiyama, Yoshio and Fukuzawa, Kaori , month = may, year =. Electron-correlated fragment-molecular-orbital calculations for biomolecular and nano systems , volume =. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , publisher =. doi:10.1039/C4CP00316K , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/c4cp00316k

  31. [31]

    Density-. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1021/ct500489d , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/ct500489d 2014

  32. [32]

    Density functional tight binding: values of semi-empirical methods in an ab initio era , volume =

    Cui, Qiang and Elstner, Marcus , month = jun, year =. Density functional tight binding: values of semi-empirical methods in an ab initio era , volume =. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. , publisher =. doi:10.1039/C4CP00908H , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1039/c4cp00908h

  33. [33]

    and Fedorov, Dmitri G

    Gordon, Mark S. and Fedorov, Dmitri G. and Pruitt, Spencer R. and Slipchenko, Lyudmila V. , month = jan, year =. Fragmentation. Chem. Rev. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/cr200093j , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/cr200093j

  34. [34]

    Fully analytic energy gradient in the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2011 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.3568010 , language =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3568010 2011

  35. [35]

    Gaus, Michael and Cui, Qiang and Elstner, Marcus , month = apr, year =. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/ct100684s , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/ct100684s

  36. [36]

    and Kitaura, Kazuo , month = dec, year =

    Sawada, Toshihiko and Fedorov, Dmitri G. and Kitaura, Kazuo , month = dec, year =. Binding of. J. Phys. Chem. B , publisher =. doi:10.1021/jp1068895 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/jp1068895

  37. [37]

    Importance of the hybrid orbital operator derivative term for the energy gradient in the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. Chem. Phys. Lett. , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2010.04.043 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2010.04.043 2010

  38. [38]

    Divide-and-conquer self-consistent field calculation for open-shell systems:. Chem. Phys. Lett. , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2010.10.005 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2010.10.005 2010

  39. [39]

    and Slipchenko, Lyudmila V

    Fedorov, Dmitri G. and Slipchenko, Lyudmila V. and Kitaura, Kazuo , month = aug, year =. Systematic. J. Phys. Chem. A , publisher =. doi:10.1021/jp101724p , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/jp101724p

  40. [40]

    Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. , author =. 2009 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/anie.200802019 2009

  41. [41]

    J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2009 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/jcc.21224 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.21224 2009

  42. [42]

    Extension of linear-scaling divide-and-conquer-based correlation method to coupled cluster theory with singles and doubles excitations , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2008 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.2956490 , language =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2956490 2008

  43. [43]

    and Jensen, Jan H

    Fedorov, Dmitri G. and Jensen, Jan H. and Deka, Ramesh C. and Kitaura, Kazuo , month = nov, year =. Covalent. J. Phys. Chem. A , publisher =. doi:10.1021/jp805435n , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/jp805435n

  44. [44]

    Extending the. J. Phys. Chem. A , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1021/jp0716740 , language =

    work page doi:10.1021/jp0716740 2007

  45. [45]

    Time-dependent density functional theory based upon the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.2772850 , language =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2772850 2007

  46. [46]

    Implementation of divide-and-conquer method including. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2007 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.20707 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.20707 2007

  47. [47]

    The three-body fragment molecular orbital method for accurate calculations of large systems , volume =. Chem. Phys. Lett. , author =. 2006 , pages =. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2006.10.052 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2006.10.052 2006

  48. [48]

    Multilayer. J. Phys. Chem. A , author =. 2005 , pages =. doi:10.1021/jp047186z , language =

    work page doi:10.1021/jp047186z 2005

  49. [49]

    The importance of three-body terms in the fragment molecular orbital method , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.1687334 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1687334 2004

  50. [50]

    Second order. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2004 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.1769362 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1769362 2004

  51. [51]

    Fragment molecular orbital method: use of approximate electrostatic potential , volume =. Chem. Phys. Lett. , author =. 2002 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(01)01416-6 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(01)01416-6 2002

  52. [52]

    Orthogonalization corrections for semiempirical methods , volume =. Theor. Chem. Acc. , author =. 2000 , keywords =. doi:10.1007/s002149900083 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1007/s002149900083 2000

  53. [53]

    Fragment molecular orbital method: application to polypeptides , volume =. Chem. Phys. Lett. , author =. 2000 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(00)00070-1 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(00)00070-1 2000

  54. [54]

    Fragment molecular orbital method: an approximate computational method for large molecules , volume =. Chem. Phys. Lett. , author =. 1999 , pages =. doi:10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00874-X , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(99)00874-x 1999

  55. [55]

    Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM , author =

    A new. Journal of Molecular Structure: THEOCHEM , author =. 1999 , keywords =. doi:10.1016/S0166-1280(98)00475-8 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/s0166-1280(98)00475-8 1999

  56. [56]

    A density‐matrix divide‐and‐conquer approach for electronic structure calculations of large molecules , volume =. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 1995 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.470549 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.470549 1995

  57. [57]

    Direct calculation of electron density in density-functional theory , volume =

    Yang, Weitao , month = mar, year =. Direct calculation of electron density in density-functional theory , volume =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , publisher =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1438 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.1438

  58. [58]

    Optimization of parameters for semiempirical methods. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 1989 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.540100208 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.540100208 1989

  59. [59]

    Dewar, Michael J. S. and Zoebisch, Eve G. and Healy, Eamonn F. and Stewart, James J. P. , month = jun, year =. Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/ja00299a024 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00299a024

  60. [60]

    Dewar, Michael J. S. and Thiel, Walter , month = jun, year =. Ground states of molecules. 38. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , publisher =. doi:10.1021/ja00457a004 , number =

    work page doi:10.1021/ja00457a004

  61. [61]

    Theoretical studies of enzymic reactions:. J. Mol. Biol. , author =. 1976 , pages =. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(76)90311-9 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1016/0022-2836(76)90311-9 1976

  62. [62]

    Approximate. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 1965 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.1701475 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1701475 1965

  63. [63]

    On the. Chem. Eur. J. , author =. 1999 , keywords =. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1521-3765(19991105)5:11<3399::AID-CHEM3399>3.0.CO;2-V , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/(sici)1521-3765(19991105)5:11 1999

  64. [64]

    Acta Cryst , author =

    The crystallography of anthracene at 95°. Acta Cryst , author =. 1964 , pages =. doi:10.1107/S0365110X64001281 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1107/s0365110x64001281 1964

  65. [65]

    Mercury 4.0: from visualization to analysis, design and prediction , volume =. J. Appl. Crystallogr. , author =. 2020 , keywords =. doi:10.1107/S1600576719014092 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1107/s1600576719014092 2020

  66. [66]

    Froitzheim, Thomas and Müller, Marcel and Hansen, Andreas and Grimme, Stefan , month = jun, year =. g-. doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-bjxvt , abstract =

    work page doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2025-bjxvt 2025

  67. [67]

    A consistent and accurate. J. Chem. Phys. , author =. 2010 , pages =. doi:10.1063/1.3382344 , number =

    work page doi:10.1063/1.3382344 2010

  68. [68]

    Wiley Interdiscip

    Subsystem density-functional theory:. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1002/wcms.1175 , number =

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1175 2014

  69. [69]

    Self-consistent-charge density-functional tight-binding method for simulations of complex materials properties , volume =. Phys. Rev. B , author =. 1998 , pages =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.58.7260 , number =

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevb.58.7260 1998

  70. [70]

    Semiempirical. Chem. Rev. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00584 2016

  71. [71]

    Wiley Interdiscip

    Semiempirical quantum–chemical methods , volume =. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. , author =. 2014 , pages =. doi:10.1002/wcms.1161 , number =

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1161 2014

  72. [72]

    Development of. J. Chem. Theory Comput. , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01214 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01214 2019

  73. [73]

    Three pillars for achieving quantum mechanical molecular dynamics simulations of huge systems:. J. Comput. Chem. , author =. 2016 , pages =. doi:10.1002/jcc.24419 , number =

    work page doi:10.1002/jcc.24419 2016

  74. [74]

    Wiley Interdiscip

    Extended tight‐binding quantum chemistry methods , volume =. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci. , author =. doi:10.1002/wcms.1493 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1002/wcms.1493

  75. [75]

    J. Chem. Theory Comput. , author =. 2019 , pages =. doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01176 , abstract =

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01176 2019

  76. [76]

    N.; Liu, F

    Houk, K. N.; Liu, F. Holy Grails for Computational Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry . Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50, 539--543

    2017

  77. [77]

    Grimme, S.; Schreiner, P. R. Computational Chemistry : The Fate of Current Methods and Future Challenges . Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2018, 57, 4170--4176

    2018

  78. [78]

    S.; Fedorov, D

    Gordon, M. S.; Fedorov, D. G.; Pruitt, S. R.; Slipchenko, L. V. Fragmentation Methods : A Route to Accurate Calculations on Large Systems . Chem. Rev. 2012, 112, 632--672

    2012

  79. [79]

    Accurate Composite and Fragment - Based Quantum Chemical Models for Large Molecules

    Raghavachari, K.; Saha, A. Accurate Composite and Fragment - Based Quantum Chemical Models for Large Molecules . Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 5643--5677

    2015

  80. [80]

    A.; Santry, D

    Pople, J. A.; Santry, D. P.; Segal, G. A. Approximate Self ‐ Consistent Molecular Orbital Theory . I . Invariant Procedures . J. Chem. Phys. 1965, 43, S129--S135

    1965

Showing first 80 references.