pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28393 · v1 · pith:NHPZIDQ5new · submitted 2026-06-23 · 💻 cs.CV

Transition-Aware best-of-N sampling for Longitudinal Chest X-ray Reports

Halil Ibrahim Gulluk , Max Van Puyvelde , Wim Van Criekinge , Olivier Gevaert This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 09:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CV
keywords chest X-ray report generationlongitudinal imagingbest-of-N samplingtransition modelingvision-language modelstraining-free inferenceset-to-set distances
0
0 comments X

The pith

Transition-aware best-of-N sampling improves longitudinal chest X-ray reports by scoring candidates against real exam-to-exam changes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces a training-free sampling method for pre-trained chest X-ray report generators that explicitly accounts for the change between a patient's prior and current exam. Reports are split into sentence embeddings treated as unordered sets, then each prior-current pair is turned into a directional transition vector using one of four set-to-set distances. Candidates are ranked by how closely their transition vector matches cached ground-truth transitions from training data, using cosine similarity aggregated by min or kNN. The method beats random selection on a multi-visit dataset across three generators and three prompts, with the largest gains appearing in the Impression section.

Core claim

The authors claim to present the first training-free best-of-N sampling scheme for pre-trained chest X-ray report generators that is explicitly aware of the longitudinal prior-to-current transition. Each report is split into sentences and embedded as an unordered set; each pair is reduced to a fixed-dimensional directional vector via a set-to-set distance; candidates are then scored by cosine distance from their transition vector to a bank of ground-truth training transitions, aggregated as min or kNN. Four directional distances are instantiated and the approach is shown to outperform random selection, especially on the Impression section.

What carries the argument

Transition-aware best-of-N sampling, which reduces each (prior, current) report pair to a directional transition vector via set-to-set distances (mean-shift, novelty residual, directed-Hausdorff anchor, cost-weighted optimal transport) and scores candidates by cosine similarity to cached ground-truth transitions.

If this is right

  • The same sampling procedure can be applied to any pre-trained vision-language report generator without retraining or fine-tuning.
  • Gains are largest on the Impression section, which is the part of the report that most directly communicates change.
  • Performance holds across multiple prompt styles and generator architectures on a multi-visit AP-PA cohort.
  • The method requires only a cached bank of ground-truth transition vectors from the training set.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could be extended to other longitudinal medical imaging tasks such as CT or MRI follow-up reports where change detection matters.
  • If the embedding model used for sentence sets is swapped for a domain-specific clinical encoder, the transition vectors might capture finer medical distinctions.
  • Combining this sampling with temperature tuning or beam search inside the generator could produce further gains without additional training.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen set-to-set distances and cosine scoring against cached ground-truth transitions will reliably identify reports that are clinically superior rather than merely similar in embedding space.

What would settle it

A reader study in which radiologists directly compare transition-aware best-of-N reports against random best-of-N reports on the same images and rate whether the selected report better describes the clinically relevant change from the prior exam.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.28393 by Halil Ibrahim Gulluk, Max Van Puyvelde, Olivier Gevaert, Wim Van Criekinge.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Sentence-level encoding of a chest X-ray report. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Transition representation and transition-aware best-of- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In longitudinal clinical practice, every chest X-ray is read in the context of the patients prior exam, and much of what the radiologist communicates is the change from one visit to the next. To the best of our knowledge, we present the first training-free best-of-N sampling scheme for pre-trained chest X-ray report generators that is explicitly aware of this longitudinal prior to current transition. We call it transition-aware best-of-N sampling, each report is split into sentences and embedded into an unordered set in Rd; each (prior, current) pair is reduced to a fixed-dim directional vector via a set-to-set distance designed to encode the change between the two sets; and candidates are scored by cosine distance from their candidate transition vector to a cached bank of ground-truth training transition vectors, aggregated as min or kNN. We instantiate the framework with four directional set distances (mean-shift, novelty residual, directed-Hausdorff anchor, and cost-weighted optimal transport) and evaluate on a multi-visit AP-PA cohort, running inference under three prompts on three vision-language generators. Transition-aware best-of-N outperforms random selection across the board, with the largest relative gains on the Impression section.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces the first training-free best-of-N sampling scheme for pre-trained chest X-ray report generators that incorporates longitudinal transition awareness. Reports are split into sentence sets, reduced to directional transition vectors via one of four set-to-set distances (mean-shift, novelty residual, directed-Hausdorff, cost-weighted OT), and ranked by cosine similarity (min or kNN) to a cached bank of ground-truth training transitions. It evaluates the approach on a multi-visit AP-PA cohort using three prompts on three vision-language models and claims consistent outperformance over random selection, with largest relative gains on the Impression section.

Significance. If the empirical gains hold and the embedding-based scoring selects reports that are clinically superior (rather than merely typical in embedding space), the work would be a useful contribution by providing a simple, training-free way to inject longitudinal priors into existing report generators without retraining.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that transition-aware best-of-N 'outperforms random selection across the board' is presented without any quantitative results, error bars, ablation details, or metric definitions, so the magnitude and reliability of the reported gains cannot be assessed.
  2. [Evaluation] Evaluation description: the only baseline is random selection; without comparisons to standard best-of-N, other sampling strategies, or human/radiologist preference scores, it remains unclear whether the cosine-to-ground-truth scoring improves factual accuracy or completeness rather than simply recovering more typical transition patterns in the VLM embedding space.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Method] The four set-to-set distances are introduced without a clear statement of their computational complexity or any hyper-parameters that must be chosen when instantiating them.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on the abstract and evaluation. We address each point below and indicate planned revisions where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the claim that transition-aware best-of-N 'outperforms random selection across the board' is presented without any quantitative results, error bars, ablation details, or metric definitions, so the magnitude and reliability of the reported gains cannot be assessed.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from quantitative context. In the revised manuscript we will add concise statements of the observed relative gains (including the largest gains on the Impression section) and the evaluation setup (three prompts, three VLMs, multi-visit cohort) while respecting length limits. Full error bars, ablation tables, and metric definitions remain in the experimental section. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Evaluation] Evaluation description: the only baseline is random selection; without comparisons to standard best-of-N, other sampling strategies, or human/radiologist preference scores, it remains unclear whether the cosine-to-ground-truth scoring improves factual accuracy or completeness rather than simply recovering more typical transition patterns in the VLM embedding space.

    Authors: The manuscript positions random selection as the direct baseline precisely to isolate the effect of the transition-aware scoring function. Because the contribution is the directional transition vector itself, a "standard" best-of-N baseline would require an alternative non-transition scoring rule that is outside the scope of the work. The method selects candidates whose transition vectors are closest to observed ground-truth transitions from the training distribution; we therefore do not claim direct gains in factual accuracy or completeness beyond recovering clinically attested longitudinal patterns. Human preference studies are valuable but require a separate clinical evaluation and are noted as future work. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; method uses external cached ground-truth as reference

full rationale

The described framework computes transition vectors from set-to-set distances on sentence embeddings and ranks via cosine similarity to a bank of training-set ground-truth transitions. This is a retrieval-style heuristic against independent data, not a self-referential derivation or fitted parameter renamed as prediction. No equations reduce to their inputs by construction, no uniqueness theorems are imported from self-citations, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The evaluation against random selection provides an external benchmark. The paper's central claim (first training-free longitudinal-aware best-of-N) rests on the empirical performance of this external-reference scheme rather than on any definitional loop.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides no equations, parameters, or background assumptions to populate the ledger.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5749 in / 955 out tokens · 26316 ms · 2026-06-30T09:50:19.731122+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    In: Proceedings of the acl workshop on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation measures for machine translation and/or summarization

    Banerjee, S., Lavie, A.: Meteor: An automatic metric for mt evaluation with improved correlation with human judgments. In: Proceedings of the acl workshop on intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation measures for machine translation and/or summarization. pp. 65–72 (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    Maira-2: Grounded radiology report generation

    Bannur, S., Bouzid, K., Castro, D.C., Schwaighofer, A., Thieme, A., Bond-Taylor, S., Ilse, M., Pérez-García, F., Salvatelli, V., Sharma, H., et al.: Maira-2: Grounded radiology report generation, 2024. URL https://arxiv. org/abs/2406.04449

    work page arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Bannur,S.,Hyland,S.,Liu,Q.,Perez-Garcia,F.,Ilse,M.,Castro,D.C.,Boecking,B., Sharma,H.,Bouzid,K.,Thieme,A.,etal.:Learningtoexploittemporalstructurefor biomedical vision-language processing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 15016–15027 (2023)

    2023

  4. [4]

    In: AAAI 2024 Spring Symposium on Clinical Foundation Models (2024)

    Chen, Z., Varma, M., Delbrouck, J.B., Paschali, M., Blankemeier, L., Van Veen, D., Valanarasu, J.M.J., Youssef, A., Cohen, J.P., Reis, E.P., et al.: Chexagent: Towards a foundation model for chest x-ray interpretation. In: AAAI 2024 Spring Symposium on Clinical Foundation Models (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problems

    Cobbe, K., Kosaraju, V., Bavarian, M., Chen, M., Jun, H., Kaiser, L., Plappert, M., Tworek, J., Hilton, J., Nakano, R., et al.: Training verifiers to solve math word problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.14168 (2021)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  6. [6]

    In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP

    Delbrouck, J.B., Chambon, P., Bluethgen, C., Tsai, E., Almusa, O., Langlotz, C.: Improving the factual correctness of radiology report generation with semantic rewards. In: Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP

  7. [7]

    4348–4360 (2022)

    pp. 4348–4360 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    In: Machine learning for health

    Endo, M., Krishnan, R., Krishna, V., Ng, A.Y., Rajpurkar, P.: Retrieval-based chest x-ray report generation using a pre-trained contrastive language-image model. In: Machine learning for health. pp. 209–219. PMLR (2021)

    2021

  9. [9]

    SDR: Set-Distance Rewards for Radiology Report Generation

    Gulluk, H.I., Van Puyvelde, M., Van Criekinge, W., Gevaert, O.: Sdr: Set-distance rewards for radiology report generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2606.00440 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  10. [10]

    Naval research logistics quarterly2(1-2), 83–97 (1955)

    Kuhn, H.W.: The hungarian method for the assignment problem. Naval research logistics quarterly2(1-2), 83–97 (1955)

    1955

  11. [11]

    In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition

    Li, M., Lin, B., Chen, Z., Lin, H., Liang, X., Chang, X.: Dynamic graph en- hanced contrastive learning for chest x-ray report generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. pp. 3334–3343 (2023)

    2023

  12. [12]

    In: International Conference on Learning Representations

    Lightman, H., Kosaraju, V., Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Baker, B., Lee, T., Leike, J., Schulman, J., Sutskever, I., Cobbe, K.: Let’s verify step by step. In: International Conference on Learning Representations. vol. 2024, pp. 39578–39601 (2024)

    2024

  13. [13]

    In: Text summarization branches out

    Lin, C.Y.: Rouge: A package for automatic evaluation of summaries. In: Text summarization branches out. pp. 74–81 (2004)

    2004

  14. [14]

    Liu, G., Hsu, T., McDermott, M., Boag, W., Weng, W., Szolovits, P., Ghas- semi, M.: Clinically accurate chest x-ray report generation. corr. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.02633 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  15. [15]

    Informatics in Medicine Unlocked50, 101585 (2024)

    Nicolson, A., Dowling, J., Anderson, D., Koopman, B.: Longitudinal data and a semantic similarity reward for chest x-ray report generation. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked50, 101585 (2024)

    2024

  16. [16]

    In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., Zhu, W.J.: Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In: Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. pp. 311–318 (2002)

    2002

  17. [17]

    WMT (2017) 10 H

    Popović, M.: chrF++: words helping character n-grams. WMT (2017) 10 H. I. Gulluk et al

    2017

  18. [18]

    In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Machine Translation (WMT)

    Rei, R., De Souza, J.G., Alves, D., Zerva, C., Farinha, A.C., Glushkova, T., Lavie, A., Coheur, L., Martins, A.F.: Comet-22: Unbabel-ist 2022 submission for the metrics shared task. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on Machine Translation (WMT). pp. 578–585 (2022)

    2022

  19. [19]

    In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)

    Reimers, N., Gurevych, I.: Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert- networks. In: Proceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). pp. 3982–3992 (2019)

    2019

  20. [20]

    In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP)

    Smit, A., Jain, S., Rajpurkar, P., Pareek, A., Ng, A.Y., Lungren, M.: Combining automatic labelers and expert annotations for accurate radiology report labeling using bert. In: Proceedings of the 2020 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). pp. 1500–1519 (2020)

    2020

  21. [21]

    Villani, C., et al.: Optimal transport: old and new, vol. 338. Springer (2009)

    2009

  22. [22]

    Meta-Radiology1(3), 100033 (2023)

    Wang, Z., Liu, L., Wang, L., Zhou, L.: R2gengpt: Radiology report generation with frozen llms. Meta-Radiology1(3), 100033 (2023)

    2023

  23. [23]

    BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERT

    Zhang, T., Kishore, V., Wu, F., Weinberger, K.Q., Artzi, Y.: Bertscore: Evaluating text generation with bert. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.09675 (2019)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1904

  24. [24]

    consult a doctor

    Zhang, X., Acosta, J.N., Miller, J., Huang, O., Rajpurkar, P.: Rexgradient-160k: A large-scale publicly available dataset of chest radiographs with free-text reports. arXiv preprint arXiv:2505.00228 (2025) Transition-Aware best-of-Nsampling for Longitudinal Chest X-ray Reports 11 A Prompts We reproduce verbatim the three prompts used in the experiments. T...

    work page arXiv 2025