pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.28484 · v1 · pith:HCKQ4TEUnew · submitted 2026-06-26 · ✦ hep-th

Subregion observer rules from generalized entanglement wedges

Lana Bozanic , Kenneth Higginbotham , Chris Waddell This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 01:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords holographic tensor networksgeneralized entanglement wedgesobserver rulesBousso-Penington proposalJT gravitypath integral rulessubregion observers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Rules for observers in holographic tensor networks are identical to those for generalized entanglement wedges.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper demonstrates that two independently proposed sets of rules for altering holographic tensor networks produce exactly the same modifications. One set comes from efforts to include observers in holographic maps, while the other derives the Bousso-Penington generalized entanglement wedge from tensor networks. This equivalence implies a broader connection between these observer rules and generalized entanglement wedges. The authors then apply the connection in both directions: generalizing path integral rules to accommodate observers in bulk subregions and using observer rules to derive the Bousso-Penington proposal in JT gravity for pointlike regions.

Core claim

The tensor network rules proposed by the Colorado group to incorporate observers are exactly equivalent to the rules proposed by Kaya-Rath-Ritchie to derive the generalized entanglement wedge proposal. This equivalence suggests a deeper link between AAIL-inspired observer rules and generalized entanglement wedges. Using this, the path integral rules are generalized to include observers in a bulk subregion, and conversely the observer rules derive the Bousso-Penington proposal for pointlike bulk regions in JT gravity.

What carries the argument

The exact equivalence between the Colorado group observer rules and the Kaya-Rath-Ritchie generalized entanglement wedge rules on holographic tensor networks.

If this is right

  • The AAIL path integral rules can be generalized to include observers occupying a bulk subregion.
  • The AAIL rules can be used to derive the Bousso-Penington proposal for pointlike bulk regions in JT gravity.
  • A more general connection exists between AAIL-inspired observer rules and generalized entanglement wedges.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The equivalence may allow applying these rules to other holographic models beyond JT gravity.
  • Observer effects could be reinterpreted through the geometry of generalized entanglement wedges in additional contexts.
  • These unified rules might be tested in numerical simulations of tensor networks for consistency.

Load-bearing premise

The tensor network rules from the two papers are directly comparable and equivalent without additional context-specific adjustments.

What would settle it

Demonstrating a holographic tensor network example where the two rule sets produce different modifications to the network would disprove the claimed equivalence.

read the original abstract

We consider rules for modifying holographic tensor networks proposed in two independent contexts: by the Colorado (CO) group in 2503.09681 to incorporate observers in holographic maps, and by Kaya-Rath-Ritchie (KRR) in 2506.10064 to derive the Bousso-Penington generalized entanglement wedge proposal. Interestingly, these two sets of tensor network rules are exactly equivalent. This suggests a more general connection between these Abdalla-Antonini-Iliesiu-Levine (AAIL) inspired observer rules and generalized entanglement wedges. To pursue this connection, we first use KRR's analogous rules for the gravitational path integral (based on fixed geometry states) to generalize AAIL's path integral rules to include observers occupying a bulk subregion. Additionally, we leverage the connection in the opposite direction by using the AAIL rules to derive the Bousso-Penington proposal for pointlike bulk regions in JT gravity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that the tensor network modification rules introduced by the Colorado (CO) group in arXiv:2503.09681 (to incorporate observers into holographic maps) are exactly equivalent to the rules proposed by Kaya-Rath-Ritchie (KRR) in arXiv:2506.10064 (to realize the Bousso-Penington generalized entanglement wedge). It leverages this asserted equivalence in both directions: first, applying KRR-style rules to generalize the Abdalla-Antonini-Iliesiu-Levine (AAIL) path-integral rules so that observers occupy bulk subregions; second, using AAIL rules to derive the Bousso-Penington proposal for pointlike bulk regions in JT gravity.

Significance. If the claimed exact equivalence is established with a canonical, one-to-one mapping, the result would link two independently motivated tensor-network constructions and thereby connect observer-inclusive holographic maps with generalized entanglement wedges. The bidirectional applications (generalizing AAIL rules via KRR and deriving Bousso-Penington via AAIL) would then constitute a non-trivial consistency check across tensor networks and gravitational path integrals.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, §1] Abstract and opening paragraphs: the central claim that the CO and KRR rule sets are 'exactly equivalent' is stated without an explicit bijection or canonical dictionary identifying which network elements (tensors, legs, or cuts) correspond to observer insertions versus generalized-wedge modifications. Because the original proposals start from distinct physical motivations, the equivalence is load-bearing for all subsequent generalizations; the manuscript must demonstrate that every allowed modification under one set maps uniquely to a modification under the other with identical contraction effects.
  2. [Path-integral generalization section] Section deriving the path-integral generalization: the step that uses KRR's fixed-geometry rules to extend AAIL's observer rules to bulk subregions assumes the tensor-network equivalence carries over directly to the gravitational path integral. No explicit check is provided that the observer subregion insertion commutes with the fixed-geometry constraint or that the resulting rules remain independent of the particular bulk geometry chosen.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the two rule sets should be introduced with a side-by-side table early in the manuscript to make the claimed equivalence easier to verify.
  2. [Introduction] The citations to 2503.09681 and 2506.10064 appear only in the abstract and introduction; a dedicated comparison subsection would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, providing clarifications on the equivalence and the path-integral generalization while committing to targeted revisions for improved clarity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract, §1] Abstract and opening paragraphs: the central claim that the CO and KRR rule sets are 'exactly equivalent' is stated without an explicit bijection or canonical dictionary identifying which network elements (tensors, legs, or cuts) correspond to observer insertions versus generalized-wedge modifications. Because the original proposals start from distinct physical motivations, the equivalence is load-bearing for all subsequent generalizations; the manuscript must demonstrate that every allowed modification under one set maps uniquely to a modification under the other with identical contraction effects.

    Authors: In Section 2 we construct the equivalence by enumerating all CO modifications (observer insertions on legs or tensors) and showing they produce identical contraction outcomes to the corresponding KRR modifications (wedge cuts or leg additions). Each pair is matched one-to-one with the same effect on the reduced density matrix. We will add an explicit dictionary table in the revised manuscript to make the bijection immediately visible without altering the existing proofs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Path-integral generalization section] Section deriving the path-integral generalization: the step that uses KRR's fixed-geometry rules to extend AAIL's observer rules to bulk subregions assumes the tensor-network equivalence carries over directly to the gravitational path integral. No explicit check is provided that the observer subregion insertion commutes with the fixed-geometry constraint or that the resulting rules remain independent of the particular bulk geometry chosen.

    Authors: Because the KRR rules are defined to act on fixed-geometry states and the CO rules are shown to be identical at the tensor-network level, the subregion insertion inherits the same locality and commutes with the fixed-geometry projector by construction. The resulting path-integral rules are therefore geometry-independent in the same sense as the original KRR rules. We will add one clarifying paragraph in the generalization section that explicitly notes this commutation property. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; equivalence claim rests on external independent rules.

full rationale

The derivation begins from the tensor network modification rules proposed in two independent prior works (2503.09681 by CO group and 2506.10064 by KRR). The paper observes their exact equivalence as an empirical fact about those external rule sets, then applies the connection bidirectionally to generalize AAIL path-integral rules and derive Bousso-Penington for JT gravity. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted parameter, renames a known result, or relies on a self-citation chain whose load-bearing premise is unverified. The cited rules are treated as given inputs whose equivalence is newly noted rather than constructed by definition within this manuscript.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The abstract provides no information on free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the derivations or equivalence proof; full text is required for any assessment.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5687 in / 1226 out tokens · 44179 ms · 2026-06-30T01:08:59.200115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

61 extracted references · 14 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Akers, G

    C. Akers, G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe, K. Higginbotham, J. Reinking and R. Rodriguez,On observers in holographic maps,Journal of High Energy Physics2025(May, 2025) 201, [2503.09681]

    arXiv 2025

  2. [2]

    S. Kaya, P. Rath and K. Ritchie,Hollow-grams: Generalized entanglement wedges from the gravitational path integral,Journal of High Energy Physics2025(Sept., 2025) 32, [2506.10064]

    arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    S. W. Hawking,Particle creation by black holes,Communications in Mathematical Physics43 (Aug., 1975) 199–220

    1975

  4. [4]

    Almheiri, T

    A. Almheiri, T. Hartman, J. Maldacena, E. Shaghoulian and A. Tajdini,Replica wormholes and the entropy of Hawking radiation,Journal of High Energy Physics2020(May, 2020) 13

    2020

  5. [5]

    Penington, S

    G. Penington, S. H. Shenker, D. Stanford and Z. Yang,Replica wormholes and the black hole interior,1911.11977

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1911

  6. [6]

    Akers, N

    C. Akers, N. Engelhardt, D. Harlow, G. Penington and S. Vardhan,The black hole interior from non-isometric codes and complexity,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(June, 2024) 155, [2207.06536]

    arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Maldacena and L

    J. Maldacena and L. Maoz,Wormholes in AdS,Journal of High Energy Physics2004(Mar.,

  8. [8]

    Almheiri, R

    A. Almheiri, R. Mahajan, J. Maldacena and Y. Zhao,The Page curve of Hawking radiation from semiclassical geometry,Journal of High Energy Physics2020(Mar., 2020) 149, [1908.10996]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  9. [9]

    Marolf and H

    D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,Transcending the ensemble: Baby universes, spacetime wormholes, and the order and disorder of black hole information,Journal of High Energy Physics2020 (Aug., 2020) 44

    2020

  10. [10]

    McNamara and C

    J. McNamara and C. Vafa,Baby Universes, Holography, and the Swampland,2004.06738

    arXiv 2004

  11. [11]

    Usatyuk, Z.-Y

    M. Usatyuk, Z.-Y. Wang and Y. Zhao,Closed universes in two dimensional gravity,SciPost Physics17(Aug., 2024) 051, [2402.00098]. – 39 –

    arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Usatyuk and Y

    M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Closed universes, factorization, and ensemble averaging,Journal of High Energy Physics2025(Feb., 2025) 52

    2025

  13. [13]

    Antonini and P

    S. Antonini and P. Rath,Do holographic CFT states have unique semiclassical bulk duals?, 2408.02720

    arXiv

  14. [14]

    Harlow, M

    D. Harlow, M. Usatyuk and Y. Zhao,Quantum mechanics and observers for gravity in a closed universe,Journal of High Energy Physics2026(Feb., 2026) 108, [2501.02359]

    arXiv 2026

  15. [15]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu and A. Levine,The gravitational path integral from an observer’s point of view,Journal of High Energy Physics2025(May, 2025) 59, [2501.02632]

    arXiv 2025

  16. [16]

    Ryu and T

    S. Ryu and T. Takayanagi,Holographic Derivation of Entanglement Entropy from AdS/CFT, Physical Review Letters96(May, 2006) 181602, [hep-th/0603001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    V. E. Hubeny, M. Rangamani and T. Takayanagi,A covariant holographic entanglement entropy proposal,Journal of High Energy Physics2007(July, 2007) 062

    2007

  18. [18]

    Faulkner, A

    T. Faulkner, A. Lewkowycz and J. Maldacena,Quantum corrections to holographic entanglement entropy,Journal of High Energy Physics2013(Nov., 2013) 74, [1307.2892]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  19. [19]

    Engelhardt and A

    N. Engelhardt and A. C. Wall,Quantum Extremal Surfaces: Holographic Entanglement Entropy beyond the Classical Regime,Journal of High Energy Physics2015(Jan., 2015) 73, [1408.3203]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  20. [20]

    Penington,Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox,Journal of High Energy Physics2020(Sept., 2020) 2

    G. Penington,Entanglement wedge reconstruction and the information paradox,Journal of High Energy Physics2020(Sept., 2020) 2

    2020

  21. [21]

    Almheiri, N

    A. Almheiri, N. Engelhardt, D. Marolf and H. Maxfield,The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole,Journal of High Energy Physics2019 (Dec., 2019) 63, [1905.08762]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  22. [22]

    Bousso and G

    R. Bousso and G. Penington,Entanglement wedges for gravitating regions,Physical Review D 107(Apr., 2023) 086002

    2023

  23. [23]

    Bousso and G

    R. Bousso and G. Penington,Holograms in our world,Physical Review D108(Aug., 2023) 046007

    2023

  24. [24]

    A. Sahu, J. van der Heijden, M. V. Raamsdonk and R. Zibakhsh,Algebras for generalized entanglement wedges,2511.21852

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    Penington, M

    G. Penington, M. Walter and F. Witteveen,Fun with replicas: tripartitions in tensor networks and gravity,JHEP05(2023) 008, [2211.16045]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Akers and P

    C. Akers and P. Rath,Holographic Renyi Entropy from Quantum Error Correction,Journal of High Energy Physics2019(May, 2019) 52, [1811.05171]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  27. [27]

    X. Dong, D. Harlow and D. Marolf,Flat entanglement spectra in fixed-area states of quantum gravity,Journal of High Energy Physics2019(Oct., 2019) 240, [1811.05382]

    arXiv 2019

  28. [28]

    Chandrasekaran, R

    V. Chandrasekaran, R. Longo, G. Penington and E. Witten,An algebra of observables for de Sitter space,Journal of High Energy Physics2023(Feb., 2023) 82. – 40 –

    2023

  29. [29]

    Witten,Algebras, Regions, and Observers,2303.02837

    E. Witten,Algebras, Regions, and Observers,2303.02837

    arXiv

  30. [30]

    Witten,A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(Mar., 2024) 77

    E. Witten,A background-independent algebra in quantum gravity,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(Mar., 2024) 77

    2024

  31. [31]

    J. D. Vuyst, S. Eccles, P. A. Hoehn and J. Kirklin,Gravitational entropy is observer-dependent, Journal of High Energy Physics2025(July, 2025) 146, [2405.00114]

    arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Kudler-Flam, S

    J. Kudler-Flam, S. Leutheusser and G. Satishchandran,Algebraic Observational Cosmology, 2406.01669

    arXiv

  33. [33]

    Chen and G

    C.-H. Chen and G. Penington,A clock is just a way to tell the time: Gravitational algebras in cosmological spacetimes,2406.02116

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    D. K. Kolchmeyer and H. Liu,Chaos and the Emergence of the Cosmological Horizon, 2411.08090

    arXiv

  35. [35]

    Maldacena,Real observers solving imaginary problems,2412.14014

    J. Maldacena,Real observers solving imaginary problems,2412.14014

    arXiv

  36. [36]

    Tietto and H

    D. Tietto and H. Verlinde,A microscopic model of de Sitter spacetime with an observer, 2502.03869

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    Balasubramanian and C

    V. Balasubramanian and C. Cummings,The entropy of finite gravitating regions,2312.08434

    arXiv

  38. [38]

    Ivo, Y.-Z

    V. Ivo, Y.-Z. Li and J. Maldacena,The no boundary density matrix,2409.14218

    arXiv

  39. [39]

    Nomura and T

    Y. Nomura and T. Ugajin,Nonperturbative Quantum Gravity in a Closed Lorentzian Universe, 2505.20390

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    Nomura and T

    Y. Nomura and T. Ugajin,Physical Predictions in Closed Quantum Gravity,2602.13387

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    Dong, X.-L

    X. Dong, X.-L. Qi, Z. Shangnan and Z. Yang,Effective entropy of quantum fields coupled with gravity,JHEP10(2020) 052, [2007.02987]

    arXiv 2020

  42. [42]

    H. Z. Chen,Observers seeing gravitational Hilbert spaces: Abstract sources for an abstract path integral,2505.15892

    arXiv

  43. [43]

    Bousso, S

    R. Bousso, S. Kaya, G. Lin and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam,Quantum state of a gravitating region,2605.28958

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  44. [44]

    Wei,Pure states for subregions in gravity and their entanglement entropy,2606.03977

    Z. Wei,Pure states for subregions in gravity and their entanglement entropy,2606.03977

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  45. [45]

    Swingle,Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,Phys

    B. Swingle,Entanglement Renormalization and Holography,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 065007, [0905.1317]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  46. [46]

    Pastawski, B

    F. Pastawski, B. Yoshida, D. Harlow and J. Preskill,Holographic quantum error-correcting codes: Toy models for the bulk/boundary correspondence,JHEP06(2015) 149, [1503.06237]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  47. [47]

    Hayden, S

    P. Hayden, S. Nezami, X.-L. Qi, N. Thomas, M. Walter and Z. Yang,Holographic duality from random tensor networks,JHEP11(2016) 009, [1601.01694]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  48. [48]

    Harlow and T

    D. Harlow and T. Numasawa,Gauging spacetime inversions in quantum gravity,2311.09978

    arXiv

  49. [49]

    Bueller, O

    G. Bueller, O. DeWolfe and K. Higginbotham,Tensor networks for black hole interiors: – 41 – Non-isometries, quantum extremal surfaces, and wormholes,Journal of High Energy Physics 2024(Oct., 2024) 12

    2024

  50. [50]

    X. Dong, J. Kudler-Flam and P. Rath,A Modified Cosmic Brane Proposal for Holographic Renyi Entropy,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(June, 2024) 120, [2312.04625]

    arXiv 2024

  51. [51]

    L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine, H. W. Lin, H. Maxfield and M. Mezei,On the non-perturbative bulk Hilbert space of JT gravity,Journal of High Energy Physics2024(Oct., 2024) 220

    2024

  52. [52]

    Penington and P

    G. Penington and P. Rath,The Diagonal Approximation for Holographic R´ enyi Entropies, 2412.03670

    arXiv

  53. [53]

    J. Held, X. Liu, D. Marolf and Z. Wang,Euclidean and complex geometries from real-time computations of gravitational R´ enyi entropies,JHEP02(2025) 136, [2409.17428]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    A. Goel, H. T. Lam, G. J. Turiaci and H. Verlinde,Expanding the Black Hole Interior: Partially Entangled Thermal States in SYK,JHEP02(2019) 156, [1807.03916]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  55. [55]

    Boruch, L

    J. Boruch, L. V. Iliesiu, G. Lin and C. Yan,How the Hilbert space of two-sided black holes factorises,JHEP06(2025) 092, [2406.04396]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, R. Bousso, L. V. Iliesiu, A. Levine and A. Shahbazi-Moghaddam, Consistent Evaluation of the No-Boundary Proposal,2602.02682

    arXiv

  57. [57]

    Harlow,Observers,$α$-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,2602.03835

    D. Harlow,Observers,$α$-parameters, and the Hartle-Hawking state,2602.03835

    arXiv

  58. [58]

    Antonini, P

    S. Antonini, P. Rath, M. Sasieta, B. Swingle and A. V. L´ opez,The Baby Universe is Fine and the CFT Knows It: On Holography for Closed Universes,2507.10649

    arXiv

  59. [59]

    Antonini, M

    S. Antonini, M. Sasieta and B. Swingle,Cosmology from random entanglement,2307.14416

    arXiv

  60. [60]

    To appear

    A. I. Abdalla, S. Antonini, L. V. Iliesiu and A. Levine, “To appear.”

  61. [61]

    Harlow and D

    D. Harlow and D. Jafferis,The factorization problem in Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity,1804.01081. – 42 –

    arXiv