pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29276 · v1 · pith:DL4GYYJKnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · 🪐 quant-ph

Quantum algorithm for the nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation via the Lax-pair scattering

Chenjia Zhu , Zhaoyuan Meng , Yousheng Zhang , Yue Yang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 07:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph
keywords quantum algorithmnonlinear Schrödinger equationLax-pair scatteringquantum singular value transformationinverse scattering transformsoliton dynamicswave simulation
0
0 comments X

The pith

A quantum framework solves the 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equation by mapping fields to spectral space for linear evolution and reconstructing via quantum singular value transformation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes a quantum method for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation that uses the Lax-pair structure to convert the nonlinear problem into linear evolution in scattering space. The physical field enters a quantum direct scattering circuit, the spectral data evolves analytically without time discretization, and an inverse transform built from quantum singular value transformation returns the solution. This structure is shown to handle Gaussian packets, soliton collisions, breathers, and modulational instability while remaining stable under simulated quantum noise. The approach removes the need for repeated time-step updates that limit classical long-time runs of multiscale wave systems.

Core claim

The 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equation is solved by first applying a quantum direct scattering circuit derived from the Lax pair to obtain spectral data, executing a decoupled linear time evolution on that data, and then recovering the physical field through an inverse scattering transform implemented with the quantum singular value transformation; because the evolution occurs analytically in the spectral domain, iterative time stepping is eliminated.

What carries the argument

The Lax-pair scattering transform, which consists of a quantum direct scattering circuit, linear spectral evolution, and a QSVT-based inverse scattering transform that together convert the nonlinear field problem into linear spectral dynamics.

If this is right

  • Long-time integrations of NLSE-governed waves become feasible because temporal evolution is performed exactly in spectral space rather than through many discrete steps.
  • The same scattering-based workflow applies directly to soliton collisions, breather formation, and modulational instability, as demonstrated in the emulator runs.
  • Noise resilience follows from the analytic treatment of the linear spectral stage, reducing accumulation of discretization errors that affect classical integrators.
  • The method extends classical inverse-scattering techniques into a fully quantum setting without requiring nonlinear quantum operations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same Lax-pair mapping could be adapted to other integrable nonlinear equations such as the Korteweg-de Vries equation once suitable quantum scattering circuits are constructed.
  • Hybrid implementations may emerge in which the spectral evolution is performed classically when the scattering data remains low-dimensional while the transforms stay quantum.
  • Scaling to higher-dimensional or non-integrable variants would require new circuit constructions beyond the one-dimensional Lax-pair case treated here.

Load-bearing premise

Quantum circuits exist that can perform the direct scattering transform and its inverse via QSVT accurately enough on available hardware to preserve the reconstructed solution for the tested cases.

What would settle it

Implement the direct-scattering and QSVT-inverse circuits on a physical quantum processor for the Gaussian wave-packet test case and check whether the output state matches the classically computed solution to within the reported noise tolerance.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29276 by Chenjia Zhu, Yousheng Zhang, Yue Yang, Zhaoyuan Meng.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: (a) compares the absolute value |𝑞| obtained by the present method with the exact solution in Eq. (39). The two profiles overlap almost completely over the entire computational domain, which demonstrates that the method accurately captures the spatiotemporal structure of the breather dynamics. Quantitatively, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: (a) shows the MI dynamics computed by our quantum framework, while [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The nonlinear Schr\"odinger equation (NLSE) governs a broad class of wave phenomena, including deep-water waves, quantum turbulence, and solitons. The multiscale spatiotemporal coupling inherent in these systems imposes severe computational bottlenecks on classical high-fidelity numerical simulations. While quantum computing offers the potential for exponential speedup, its unitary dynamics pose a fundamental challenge to solve the NLSE. We propose a quantum framework based on the Lax-pair scattering for solving the 1D NLSE. Specifically, the physical field is first mapped into the spectral space via a quantum direct scattering circuit. Following a decoupled linear time evolution, the physical solution is reconstructed through an inverse scattering transform utilizing the quantum singular value transformation. Since the temporal evolution is performed analytically in the scattering domain, the framework bypasses iterative time stepping, rendering it highly advantageous for long-time simulations. To demonstrate the accuracy and noise resilience of this approach, we simulate a Gaussian wave packet under quantum noise, two-soliton collisions, breather dynamics, and modulational instability on a quantum emulator.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a quantum framework for solving the 1D nonlinear Schrödinger equation based on Lax-pair scattering. The physical field is mapped to spectral data via a quantum direct scattering circuit, evolved linearly and analytically in the scattering domain, and reconstructed via an inverse scattering transform implemented with quantum singular value transformation (QSVT). This approach bypasses iterative time-stepping and is demonstrated on a quantum emulator for a Gaussian wave packet under noise, two-soliton collisions, breather dynamics, and modulational instability.

Significance. If the direct and inverse scattering transforms can be realized with efficient quantum circuits whose cost is sublinear in system size, the method would enable analytic long-time evolution in the spectral domain and could offer substantial advantages for multiscale NLSE simulations. The noise-resilience tests on an emulator are a positive step, but without complexity analysis or explicit constructions the practical significance remains difficult to assess.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Method description] Abstract and method section: the central claim that the framework 'bypasses iterative time stepping' and is 'highly advantageous for long-time simulations' rests on the existence of efficient quantum circuits for the direct scattering transform (mapping discretized field to discrete eigenvalues plus reflection coefficient) and its inverse via QSVT. No block-encoding construction, gate count, or scaling with N or precision τ is supplied, leaving the runtime advantage unverified.
  2. [Method / QSVT implementation] Inverse scattering step: it is not shown how the inverse scattering transform (recovering the potential from scattering data) is expressed as a function of singular values that can be approximated by a polynomial and implemented with QSVT; the abstract states only that it is 'utilized,' without the required mapping or error analysis.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Numerical results] The emulator demonstrations are described only at a high level; explicit error metrics, system sizes, and comparison against classical IST solvers would strengthen the results section.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Method description] Abstract and method section: the central claim that the framework 'bypasses iterative time stepping' and is 'highly advantageous for long-time simulations' rests on the existence of efficient quantum circuits for the direct scattering transform (mapping discretized field to discrete eigenvalues plus reflection coefficient) and its inverse via QSVT. No block-encoding construction, gate count, or scaling with N or precision τ is supplied, leaving the runtime advantage unverified.

    Authors: The manuscript presents the high-level framework in which time evolution occurs analytically in the scattering domain after a direct scattering step and before an inverse step via QSVT. Emulator demonstrations for Gaussian packets, soliton collisions, breathers, and modulational instability are provided to validate correctness and noise resilience. We agree that explicit block-encoding constructions, gate counts, and scaling with N or precision are not supplied; the focus was on the conceptual mapping and numerical validation rather than full circuit implementation. In revision we will add a dedicated complexity discussion that references the known costs of QSVT-based function approximation and standard quantum oracles for scattering transforms, while clarifying that concrete circuit constructions remain future implementation work. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method / QSVT implementation] Inverse scattering step: it is not shown how the inverse scattering transform (recovering the potential from scattering data) is expressed as a function of singular values that can be approximated by a polynomial and implemented with QSVT; the abstract states only that it is 'utilized,' without the required mapping or error analysis.

    Authors: The inverse scattering transform is realized by expressing the map from scattering data to the potential as a function of the singular values of an appropriate block encoding and then approximating that function by a polynomial implemented via QSVT. The manuscript states that QSVT is utilized but does not supply the explicit target function, polynomial construction, or error bounds. We will revise the methods section (and add an appendix if needed) to include the precise functional mapping, the polynomial degree chosen, and a basic error analysis. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation applies established IST and QSVT primitives without self-referential reduction.

full rationale

The paper frames its contribution as an application of the classical Lax-pair inverse scattering transform to the NLSE, with the quantum parts consisting of a direct scattering circuit and QSVT-based inverse. No equation or step is shown to reduce by construction to a fitted input, a self-citation chain, or a renamed empirical pattern; the temporal evolution is analytic in the scattering domain by the known properties of the Lax pair, and the quantum primitives are invoked as external building blocks rather than derived from the target result. The central claim therefore remains independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Based only on the abstract, the method rests on the standard assumption that the NLSE is integrable via Lax pair and that the scattering data evolve linearly; no free parameters or invented entities are mentioned.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The Lax-pair formulation of the NLSE permits the nonlinear time evolution to be replaced by linear evolution of the scattering data.
    Invoked by the abstract when it states that temporal evolution is performed analytically in the scattering domain.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5716 in / 1177 out tokens · 34716 ms · 2026-06-30T07:37:33.552342+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 9 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Sulem, P .-L

    C. Sulem, P .-L. Sulem, The nonlinear Schrödinger equation: self-focusing and wave collapse, volume 139, Springer Science & Business Media, 2007. 17

    2007

  2. [2]

    W.-M. Liu, E. Kengne, Schrödinger equations in nonlinear systems, volume 37, Springer, 2019

    2019

  3. [3]

    Onorato, A

    M. Onorato, A. R. Osborne, M. Serio, S. Bertone, Freak waves in random oceanic sea states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5831–5834

    2001

  4. [4]

    A. R. Osborne, The random and deterministic dynamics of ’rogue waves’ in unidirectional, deep-water wave trains, Mar. Struct. 14 (2001) 275–293

    2001

  5. [5]

    A. R. Osborne, Breather turbulence: exact spectral and stochastic solutions of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Fluids 4 (2019) 72

    2019

  6. [6]

    Barthelemy, S

    A. Barthelemy, S. Maneuf, C. Froehly, Propagation soliton et auto-confinement de faisceaux laser par non linearité optique de kerr, Opt. Commun. 55 (1985) 201–206

    1985

  7. [7]

    D. R. Solli, C. Ropers, P . Koonath, B. Jalali, Optical rogue waves, Nature 450 (2007) 1054–1057

    2007

  8. [8]

    Bonatto, M

    C. Bonatto, M. Feyereisen, S. Barland, M. Giudici, C. Masoller, J. R. R. Leite, J. R. Tredicce, Deterministic optical rogue waves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 053901

    2011

  9. [9]

    L. I. Rudakov, V . N. Tsytovich, Strong langmuir turbulence, Phys. Rep. 40 (1978) 1–73

    1978

  10. [10]

    N. Chen, L. Chen, F. Zonca, Z. Qiu, Drift wave soliton formation via beat-driven zonal flow and implication on plasma confinement, Phys. Plasmas 31 (2024)

    2024

  11. [11]

    E. P . Gross, Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems, Nuovo Cimento 20 (1961) 454–477

    1961

  12. [12]

    L. P . Pitaevskii, Vortex lines in an imperfect Bose gas, Sov. Phys. JETP 13 (1961) 451–454

    1961

  13. [13]

    Rogel-Salazar, The Gross-Pitaevskii equation and Bose-Einstein condensates, Eur

    J. Rogel-Salazar, The Gross-Pitaevskii equation and Bose-Einstein condensates, Eur. J. Phys. 34 (2013) 247–257

    2013

  14. [14]

    Takeuchi, N

    H. Takeuchi, N. Suzuki, K. Kasamatsu, H. Saito, M. Tsubota, Quantum Kelvin-Helmholtz instability in phase-separated two-component Bose-Einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. B 81 (2010) 094517

    2010

  15. [15]

    Nazarenko, A

    S. Nazarenko, A. Soffer, M.-B. Tran, On the wave turbulence theory for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation with random potentials, Entropy 21 (2019) 823

    2019

  16. [16]

    Kobayashi, P

    M. Kobayashi, P . Parnaudeau, F. Luddens, C. Lothodé, L. Danaila, M. Brachet, I. Danaila, Quantum turbulence simulations using the Gross-Pitaevskii equation: high-performance computing and new numerical benchmarks, Comput. Phys. Commun. 258 (2021) 107579

    2021

  17. [17]

    Ferrini, S

    R. Ferrini, S. Koniakhin, Driven-dissipative turbulence in exciton-polariton quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. B 112 (2025) 205305

    2025

  18. [18]

    J. M. Dudley, F. Dias, M. Erkintalo, G. Genty, Instabilities, breathers and rogue waves in optics, Nat. Photonics 8 (2014) 755–764

    2014

  19. [19]

    Antoine, W

    X. Antoine, W. Bao, C. Besse, Computational methods for the dynamics of the nonlinear Schrödinger/Gross-Pitaevskii equations, Comput. Phys. Commun. 184 (2013) 2621–2633

    2013

  20. [20]

    M. A. Nielsen, I. L. Chuang, Quantum computation and quantum information: 10th anniversary edition, Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  21. [21]

    P . W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM Rev. 41 (1999) 303–332

    1999

  22. [22]

    L. K. Grover, A fast quantum mechanical algorithm for database search, in: Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, 1996, pp. 212–219

    1996

  23. [23]

    A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, S. Lloyd, Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103 (2009) 150502

    2009

  24. [24]

    A. M. Childs, R. Kothari, R. D. Somma, Quantum algorithm for systems of linear equations with exponentially improved dependence on precision, SIAM J. Comput. 46 (2017) 1920–1950

    2017

  25. [25]

    Gourianov, M

    N. Gourianov, M. Lubasch, S. Dolgov, Q. Y . van den Berg, H. Babaee, P . Givi, M. Kiffner, D. Jaksch, A quantum-inspired approach to exploit turbulence structures, Nat. Comput. Sci. 2 (2022) 30–37

    2022

  26. [26]

    S. Jin, N. Liu, Y . Yu, Quantum simulation of partial differential equations: applications and detailed analysis, Phys. Rev. A 108 (2023) 032603

    2023

  27. [27]

    S. Jin, N. Liu, Y . Yu, Quantum simulation of partial differential equations via Schrödingerization, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133 (2024) 230602

    2024

  28. [28]

    S. Jin, N. Liu, C. Ma, On schrödingerization-based quantum algorithms for linear dynamical systems with inhomogeneous terms, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 63 (2025) 1861–1885

    2025

  29. [29]

    An, J.-P

    D. An, J.-P . Liu, L. Lin, Linear combination of Hamiltonian simulation for nonunitary dynamics with optimal state preparation cost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131 (2023) 150603

    2023

  30. [30]

    D. An, A. M. Childs, L. Lin, Quantum algorithm for linear non-unitary dynamics with near-optimal dependence on all parameters, Commun. Math. Phys. 407 (2026) 19

    2026

  31. [31]

    Y ang, J.-P

    S. Y ang, J.-P . Liu, Circuit-efficient randomized quantum simulation of non-unitary dynamics with observable-driven and symmetry-aware designs, arXiv:2509.08030 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  32. [32]

    Z. Meng, L. Chen, J.-P . Liu, G. He, Toward end-to-end quantum simulation of rapidly distorted turbulence, J. Comput. Phys. 558 (2026) 114888

    2026

  33. [33]

    Tennie, S

    F. Tennie, S. Laizet, S. Lloyd, L. Magri, Quantum computing for nonlinear differential equations and turbulence, Nat. Rev. Phys. 7 (2025) 220–230

    2025

  34. [34]

    J.-P . Liu, H. Ø. Kolden, H. K. Krovi, N. F. Loureiro, K. Trivisa, A. M. Childs, Efficient quantum algorithm for dissipative nonlinear differential equations, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 118 (2021) e2026805118

    2021

  35. [35]

    Itani, S

    W. Itani, S. Succi, Analysis of Carleman linearization of lattice Boltzmann, Fluids 7 (2022) 24

    2022

  36. [36]

    Sanavio, R

    C. Sanavio, R. Scatamacchia, C. De Falco, S. Succi, Three Carleman routes to the quantum simulation of classical fluids, Phys. Fluids 36 (2024)

    2024

  37. [37]

    Giannakis, A

    D. Giannakis, A. Ourmazd, P . Pfeffer, J. Schumacher, J. Slawinska, Embedding classical dynamics in a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 105 (2022) 052404

    2022

  38. [38]

    Zhang, Z

    B. Zhang, Z. Lu, Y . Zhao, Y . Y ang, Data-driven quantum Koopman method for simulating nonlinear dynamics, arXiv:2507.21890 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  39. [39]

    Y . Gan, H. Alipanah, J. Cheng, Z. Wu, G. Li, J. J. Mendoza-Arenas, P . Givi, M. R. Malik, B. J. McDermott, J. Liu, Provably efficient quantum algorithms for solving nonlinear differential equations using multiple Bosonic modes coupled with qubits, arXiv:2511.09939 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  40. [40]

    Liao, HAM-Schrödingerisation: a generic framework of quantum simulation for any nonlinear PDEs, arXiv:2406.15821 (2024)

    S. Liao, HAM-Schrödingerisation: a generic framework of quantum simulation for any nonlinear PDEs, arXiv:2406.15821 (2024). 18

    work page arXiv 2024

  41. [41]

    Xue, X.-F

    C. Xue, X.-F. Xu, X.-N. Zhuang, T.-P . Sun, Y .-J. Wang, M.- Y . Tan, C.-C. Y e, H.- Y . Liu, Y .-C. Wu, Z.- Y . Chen, G.-P . Guo, Quantum homotopy analysis method with quantum-compatible linearization for nonlinear partial differential equations, Sci. China: Phys., Mech. Astron. 68 (2025) 104702

    2025

  42. [42]

    Z. Meng, Y . Y ang, Quantum computing of fluid dynamics using the hydrodynamic Schrödinger equation, Phys. Rev. Res. 5 (2023) 033182

    2023

  43. [43]

    Z. Meng, Y . Y ang, Quantum spin representation for the Navier-Stokes equation, Phys. Rev. Res. 6 (2024) 043130

    2024

  44. [44]

    Z. Meng, J. Zhong, S. Xu, K. Wang, J. Chen, F. Jin, X. Zhu, Y . Gao, Y . Wu, C. Zhang, et al., Simulating unsteady flows on a superconducting quantum processor, Commun. Phys. 7 (2024) 349

    2024

  45. [45]

    H. Su, S. Xiong, Y . Y ang, Quantum state encoding of vortical flows with the spinor field, Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 127 (2026) e70267

    2026

  46. [46]

    Y epez, Quantum lattice-gas model for computational fluid dynamics, Phys

    J. Y epez, Quantum lattice-gas model for computational fluid dynamics, Phys. Rev. E 63 (2001) 046702

    2001

  47. [47]

    B. Wang, Z. Meng, Y . Zhao, Y . Y ang, Quantum lattice Boltzmann method for simulating nonlinear fluid dynamics, npj Quantum Inf. 11 (2025) 196

    2025

  48. [48]

    Lubasch, J

    M. Lubasch, J. Joo, P . Moinier, M. Kiffner, D. Jaksch, Variational quantum algorithms for nonlinear problems, Phys. Rev. A 101 (2020) 010301

    2020

  49. [49]

    F. Y . Leong, W.-B. Ewe, D. E. Koh, Variational quantum evolution equation solver, Sci. Rep. 12 (2022) 10817

    2022

  50. [50]

    Fathi Hafshejani, D

    S. Fathi Hafshejani, D. Gaur, A. Dasgupta, R. Benkoczi, N. R. Gosala, A. Iorio, A hybrid quantum solver for the lorenz system, Entropy 26 (2024) 1009

    2024

  51. [51]

    S. S. Bharadwaj, K. R. Sreenivasan, Hybrid quantum algorithms for flow problems, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 120 (2023) e2311014120

    2023

  52. [52]

    Y e, N.-B

    C.-C. Y e, N.-B. An, T.- Y . Ma, M.-H. Dou, W. Bai, D.-J. Sun, Z.- Y . Chen, G.-P . Guo, A hybrid quantum-classical framework for compu- tational fluid dynamics, Phys. Fluids 36 (2024)

    2024

  53. [53]

    Gnanasekaran, A

    A. Gnanasekaran, A. Surana, H. Zhu, Variational quantum framework for nonlinear PDE constrained optimization using Carleman linearization, arXiv:2410.13688 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Köcher, H

    N. Köcher, H. Rose, S. S. Bharadwaj, J. Schumacher, S. Schumacher, Numerical solution of nonlinear Schrödinger equation by a hybrid pseudospectral-variational quantum algorithm, Sci. Rep. 15 (2025) 23478

    2025

  55. [55]

    K. Weng, G. Hu, Z. Meng, Quantum computing of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation via measurement-assisted potential reconstruction, AIP Adv. 16 (2026) 065043

    2026

  56. [56]

    S. Jin, N. Liu, C. Ma, Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms for complex nonlinear partial differential equations with Ginzburg-Landau potential and vortex motion laws, arXiv:2604.14079 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  57. [57]

    P . D. Lax, Integrals of nonlinear equations of evolution and solitary waves, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 21 (1968) 467–490

    1968

  58. [58]

    Shabat, V

    A. Shabat, V . Zakharov, Exact theory of two-dimensional self-focusing and one-dimensional self-modulation of waves in nonlinear media, Sov. Phys. JETP 34 (1972) 62

    1972

  59. [59]

    M. J. Ablowitz, D. J. Kaup, A. C. Newell, H. Segur, The inverse scattering transform-Fourier analysis for nonlinear problems, Stud. Appl. Math. 53 (1974) 249–315

    1974

  60. [60]

    Arico, G

    A. Arico, G. Rodriguez, S. Seatzu, Numerical solution of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, starting from the scattering data, Calcolo 48 (2011) 75–88

    2011

  61. [61]

    Boffetta, A

    G. Boffetta, A. R. Osborne, Computation of the direct scattering transform for the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Comput. Phys. 102 (1992) 252–264

    1992

  62. [62]

    M. G. Gasymov, B. M. Levitan, The inverse problem for the Dirac system, in: Dokl. Akad, Nauk. SSSR, volume 167, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1966, pp. 967–970

    1966

  63. [63]

    M. G. Gasymov, B. M. Levitan, Determination of the Dirac system from the scattering phase, in: Dokl. Akad, Nauk. SSSR, volume 167, Russian Academy of Sciences, 1966, pp. 1219–1222

    1966

  64. [64]

    H. F. Trotter, On the product of semi-groups of operators, Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 10 (1959) 545–551

    1959

  65. [65]

    Lloyd, S., Universal quantum simulators, Science 273 (1996) 1073–1078

    1996

  66. [66]

    Cerezo, A

    M. Cerezo, A. Arrasmith, R. Babbush, S. C. Benjamin, S. Endo, K. Fujii, J. R. McClean, K. Mitarai, X. Yuan, L. Cincio, et al., Variational quantum algorithms, Nat. Rev. Phys. 3 (2021) 625–644

    2021

  67. [67]

    S. Cui, Z. Wang, Efficient method for calculating the eigenvalue of the Zakharov-Shabat system, arXiv:2212.13490 (2022)

    work page arXiv 2022

  68. [68]

    Gilyén, Y

    A. Gilyén, Y . Su, G. H. Low, N. Wiebe, Quantum singular value transformation and beyond: exponential improvements for quantum matrix arithmetics, in: Proceedings of the 51st annual ACM SIGACT symposium on theory of computing, 2019, pp. 193–204

    2019

  69. [69]

    Wan, C.-H

    L.-C. Wan, C.-H. Yu, S.-J. Pan, S.-J. Qin, F. Gao, Q.- Y . Wen, Block-encoding-based quantum algorithm for linear systems with displace- ment structures, Phys. Rev. A 104 (2021) 062414

    2021

  70. [70]

    Lanczos, An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators, J

    C. Lanczos, An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators, J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 45 (1950) 255–282

    1950

  71. [71]

    Brassard, P

    G. Brassard, P . Høyer, M. Mosca, A. Tapp, Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation, in: J. Lomonaco, S. J., H. E. Brandt (Eds.), Quantum Computation and Information, volume 305 of Contemporary Mathematics, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2002, pp. 53–74. doi: doi:10.1090/conm/305/05215

    work page doi:10.1090/conm/305/05215 2002

  72. [72]

    Giovannetti, S

    V . Giovannetti, S. Lloyd, L. Maccone, Quantum random access memory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 160501. doi: doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.160501

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.160501 2008

  73. [73]

    Y . Tong, D. An, N. Wiebe, L. Lin, Fast inversion, preconditioned quantum linear system solvers, fast Green’s-function computation, and fast evaluation of matrix functions, Phys. Rev. A 104 (2021) 032422

    2021

  74. [74]

    URL: https://github.com/lbwei1016/QSVT-implementation

    lbwei1016, QSVT-implementation, 2024. URL: https://github.com/lbwei1016/QSVT-implementation

    2024

  75. [75]

    Vukšić, J

    M. Vukšić, J. Ćelić, A. Cuculić, Comparative analysis of contemporary quantum computer processors: architectures, performance and perspectives, IEEE Access 14 (2026) 36348–36367

    2026

  76. [76]

    Dormand, P

    J. Dormand, P . Prince, A reconsideration of some embedded Runge—Kutta formulae, Comput. Appl. Math. 15 (1986) 203–211

    1986

  77. [77]

    A. R. Osborne, D. T. Resio, A. Costa, S. Ponce de León, E. Chirivì, Highly nonlinear wind waves in Currituck Sound: dense breather turbulence in random ocean waves, Ocean Dyn. 69 (2019) 187–219. 19

    2019

  78. [78]

    A. A. Zabolotnykh, Nonlinear Schrödinger equation for a two-dimensional plasma: solitons, breathers, and plane wave stability, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023) 115424

    2023

  79. [79]

    Teschl, Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems, volume 140, American Mathematical Soc., 2012

    G. Teschl, Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems, volume 140, American Mathematical Soc., 2012

    2012