pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.29323 · v1 · pith:4S3RKOBSnew · submitted 2026-06-28 · ✦ hep-th

BMS₃-like algebras via the Z_N-graded u(1)² Kac-Moody algebra

Armin Ghazi , Ahmad Moradpouri This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-30 02:42 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th
keywords BMS3 algebraZ_N gradingSugawara constructionKac-Moody algebranilpotent idealalgebraic varietycentral extensionconformal weight
0
0 comments X

The pith

Compactification of the Z_N-graded Sugawara variety for u(1)^2 adds points at infinity that realize generalized BMS3 algebras as Vir ⋊ F with nilpotent F.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that the non-compact algebraic variety of Z_N-graded Sugawara constructions on the u(1)^2 Kac-Moody algebra can be compactified by adding its points at infinity. These points correspond exactly to BMS3-like algebras written as the semidirect product Vir ⋊ F. When N equals 2 the construction recovers the ordinary BMS3 algebra with F an infinite abelian ideal. For N greater than 2 the ideal F becomes nonabelian and nilpotent with depth r less than N, and this depth equals the order of the singularity of the variety at the point. The polynomials that cut out the variety factor into linear factors, which would classify all such BMS3-like algebras, and the central extensions of the resulting algebras match those required for primary fields of conformal weight h equals 2.

Core claim

The points at infinity in the algebraic variety of Z_N-graded Sugawara constructions for the u(1)^2 Kac-Moody algebra correspond precisely to generalizations of the BMS3 algebra, realized as Vir ⋊ F where F is a nilpotent ideal of depth r less than N for N greater than 2, with the depth equal to the order of the singularity at the point. The polynomials defining the varieties exhibit a factorization into linear factors that classifies all BMS3-like algebras. The central extensions of these algebras are consistent with primary fields of conformal weight h equals 2.

What carries the argument

Compactification of the non-compact algebraic variety of Z_N-graded Sugawara constructions by adding points at infinity, which map to the Vir ⋊ F structure with F a nilpotent ideal whose depth tracks the singularity order.

If this is right

  • For N equals 2 the construction recovers the standard BMS3 algebra with F abelian.
  • For N greater than 2 the ideal F is nonabelian and nilpotent of depth r less than N.
  • The nilpotency depth r of F equals the order of the singularity of the variety at the corresponding point.
  • The defining polynomials of the variety factor into linear factors, which would classify all BMS3-like algebras.
  • The central extensions of the resulting algebras match the general structure expected for primary fields of weight h equals 2.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The depth-singularity link supplies a geometric origin for the nilpotency structure of the generalized BMS3 algebras.
  • If the linear factorization holds for arbitrary N then every BMS3-like algebra arises from some point at infinity in these varieties.
  • The same compactification method applied to other graded current algebras could generate further families of nilpotent extensions of the Virasoro algebra.

Load-bearing premise

The compactification procedure by adding points at infinity to the non-compact algebraic variety of Z_N-graded Sugawara constructions yields exactly the stated BMS3-like algebras without additional constraints or missing generators.

What would settle it

An explicit computation for N equals 3 that produces either an ideal F with depth not matching the singularity order or extra generators outside the Vir ⋊ F form would disprove the claimed correspondence.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.29323 by Ahmad Moradpouri, Armin Ghazi.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Non-compact algebraic variety corresponding to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. The projective moduli space of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The Sugawara construction provides a natural way to construct the Virasoro algebra from a current algebra. It was shown in Ref.~\cite{Ghazi:2025oin} that for the $u(1)^2$ Kac-Moody current algebra, there exist additional constructions that exhibit a $\mathbb{Z}_N$-graded structure. Indeed, the space of such constructions defines a non-compact algebraic variety whose dimension depends on $N$. In this paper, we consider the compactification of these algebraic varieties by adding points at infinity to the non-compact part, and show that these points correspond precisely to generalizations of $BMS_3$-like algebras. More explicitly, for a $\mathbb{Z}_2$ grading, the corresponding algebra coincides with the $BMS_3$ algebra, which takes the form $\mathrm{Vir} \rtimes F$, where $F$ is an infinite abelian ideal of the full algebra. For $N > 2$, we show that there exist generalizations of the standard $BMS_3$ algebra of the form $\mathrm{Vir} \rtimes F$, where $F$ is a nonabelian ideal that forms a nilpotent algebra of depth $r < N$. We further demonstrate that the depth of the algebra is related to the order of the singularity of the algebraic variety at that point. We also show that the polynomials defining the algebraic varieties exhibit a factorization property into linear factors, which, if true, classifies all $BMS_3$-like algebras. Finally, we study the central extensions of these algebras, which are consistent with the general structure of algebras corresponding to primary fields of conformal weight $h = 2$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that compactifying the non-compact algebraic varieties of Z_N-graded Sugawara constructions for the u(1)^2 Kac-Moody algebra by adding points at infinity produces generalizations of BMS_3 algebras. These take the form Vir ⋊ F, where F is an infinite abelian ideal for N=2 (recovering the standard BMS_3 algebra) and a nonabelian nilpotent ideal of depth r < N for N>2, with the depth tied to the order of the singularity at the point. The defining polynomials are asserted to factor into linear factors, which—if true—would classify all such BMS_3-like algebras. Central extensions are stated to be consistent with primary fields of conformal weight h=2.

Significance. If the claimed precise correspondence holds without extra constraints or missing generators, the work would link algebraic geometry of Sugawara varieties to the structure of BMS-like algebras, potentially offering a geometric origin for their nilpotency depth and a classification via polynomial factorization. This could be relevant for asymptotic symmetries in 3d gravity. The conditional phrasing of the factorization claim and absence of explicit limiting-current computations, however, leave the central correspondence unverified in the presented material.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on compactification): the assertion that points at infinity 'correspond precisely' to Vir ⋊ F with the stated nonabelian nilpotency and depth r < N for N>2 is not supported by any explicit computation showing that the limiting currents satisfy exactly the original variety equations, recover all generators of F, and introduce no additional relations.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract (factorization sentence): the polynomials are said to 'exhibit a factorization property into linear factors, which, if true, classifies all BMS_3-like algebras'; the qualifier 'if true' indicates the classification is conjectural rather than demonstrated, making the claim load-bearing but unsupported.
  3. [Abstract] Abstract (N>2 case): no verification is given that the compactification procedure automatically produces the nonabelian structure and the precise relation between singularity order and nilpotency depth without further restrictions on the currents.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'the explicit form Vir ⋊ F' without defining the semidirect product action or the explicit generators of F for general N.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that the abstract claims require stronger explicit support and will revise the paper to include the requested computations and clarifications. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (paragraph on compactification): the assertion that points at infinity 'correspond precisely' to Vir ⋊ F with the stated nonabelian nilpotency and depth r < N for N>2 is not supported by any explicit computation showing that the limiting currents satisfy exactly the original variety equations, recover all generators of F, and introduce no additional relations.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the abstract statement requires explicit verification. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated subsection containing explicit computations of the limiting currents for N>2. These calculations will confirm that the currents continue to satisfy the original variety equations, generate the complete set of generators for the ideal F, and introduce no extraneous relations, thereby substantiating the precise correspondence. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (factorization sentence): the polynomials are said to 'exhibit a factorization property into linear factors, which, if true, classifies all BMS_3-like algebras'; the qualifier 'if true' indicates the classification is conjectural rather than demonstrated, making the claim load-bearing but unsupported.

    Authors: The qualifier 'if true' was chosen precisely because the factorization is observed in all computed examples but lacks a general proof. We agree this renders the classification conjectural. In the revision we will rephrase the abstract to present the factorization as a conjecture supported by explicit examples, move the classification statement to a dedicated discussion section, and clearly label it as such. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract (N>2 case): no verification is given that the compactification procedure automatically produces the nonabelian structure and the precise relation between singularity order and nilpotency depth without further restrictions on the currents.

    Authors: We will include in the revised version explicit examples together with a general argument showing that the compactification procedure yields the nonabelian nilpotent ideal with depth r fixed by the singularity order. These additions will demonstrate that the structure arises directly from the variety without imposing extra restrictions on the currents beyond the defining equations. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Minor self-citation to base varieties; compactification and singularity-depth claims are independent additions

specific steps
  1. self citation load bearing [Abstract]
    "It was shown in Ref.~\cite{Ghazi:2025oin} that for the $u(1)^2$ Kac-Moody current algebra, there exist additional constructions that exhibit a $\mathbb{Z}_N$-graded structure. Indeed, the space of such constructions defines a non-compact algebraic variety whose dimension depends on $N$. In this paper, we consider the compactification of these algebraic varieties by adding points at infinity to the non-compact part, and show that these points correspond precisely to generalizations of $BMS_3$-like algebras."

    The base variety is taken from self-citation, but the compactification step that produces the BMS_3-like algebras is presented as an independent construction; the citation is not load-bearing for the new identification or the depth-singularity relation.

full rationale

The derivation begins from the non-compact Z_N-graded varieties established in the cited prior work, then performs a new compactification by adding points at infinity and identifies the resulting algebras as Vir ⋊ F with the stated nilpotency and depth properties. The self-citation supplies only the starting algebraic variety; the correspondence, depth-singularity relation, and conditional factorization are developed as separate steps without reducing the new claims to the prior inputs by construction or redefinition. No fitted parameters are renamed as predictions, no uniqueness theorem is imported, and the central compactification argument remains self-contained against the external variety equations.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The constructions rest on standard properties of Kac-Moody and Virasoro algebras plus the existence of the Z_N-graded Sugawara operators from the cited reference; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The space of Z_N-graded Sugawara constructions on u(1)^2 forms a non-compact algebraic variety whose dimension depends on N (from cited prior work).
    Invoked in the first paragraph to define the starting point for compactification.
  • standard math Central extensions of the resulting algebras are consistent with primary fields of weight h=2 (standard in CFT).
    Stated as the final result without derivation in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5852 in / 1423 out tokens · 38165 ms · 2026-06-30T02:42:46.144253+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 10 canonical work pages · 7 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    If we defined 1 0 = X Z andc 1 1 = Y Z, then the points corre- spond precisely to the limitZ→0

    Factorization of the closure space The points at infinity have a simple feature. If we defined 1 0 = X Z andc 1 1 = Y Z, then the points corre- spond precisely to the limitZ→0. Geometrically, these are exactly the points that lie in the locusZ= 0in the projective completion with homogeneous coordinates [X:Y:Z]. In this regime, the defining relation (41) s...

  2. [2]

    In this instance, the structure of the solution space is richer, forming a four-dimensional surface

    The Moduli Space of theZ 3-Case TheZ 3 case provides the next simplest example for ex- amining the factorization conjecture and comparing the corresponding space with that of theZ 2 case. In this instance, the structure of the solution space is richer, forming a four-dimensional surface. The constraints (30) determine the following relations betweenc k ω ...

  3. [3]

    = 1,(64) d1 1d2 1 −c 1 1c2 1 +e 4πi 3 d1 1d2 0 +e 2πi 3 d1 0d2 1 = 0,(65) e 2πi 3 d1 0c2 1 +e 4πi 3 d2 0c1 1 −(d 1 1c2 1 +c 1 1d2

  4. [4]

    However, we can use Equations (67)–(69) to expressd 2 0,d 2 1, andc 2 1 in terms ofd 1 0,d 1 1, andc 1

    = 0(66) (d1 0)2 −e 2πi 3 (d1 1)2 + (c1 1)2 =d 2 0,(67) (d1 1)2 −(c 1 1)2 −e 2πi 3 d1 0d1 1 =d 2 1,(68) −e 2πi 3 d1 0c1 1 −2d 1 1c1 1 =c 2 1,(69) (d2 0)2 −e 4πi 3 (d2 1)2 + (c2 1)2 =d 1 0,(70) −e 4πi 3 d2 0d2 1 + (d2 1)2 −(c 2 1)2 =d 1 1,(71) −e 4πi 3 d2 0c2 1 −2d 2 1c2 1 =c 1 1,(72) (d1 0d2 1 +d 1 1d2 0)(e 4πi 3 −1) + (d 1 1d2 1 −c 1 1c2 1)(e 2πi 3 −e 4πi...

  5. [5]

    Eliminatingd 2 0,d 2 1, andc 2 1 from the equations then yields the following simplified system: x3 + 2w3 −3ωx(w 2 +y 2)−6wy 2 = 1,(75) Here,ω≡e 2πi 3

    To simplify the notation, let us defined1 0 ≡x,d 1 1 ≡w, and c1 1 ≡y. Eliminatingd 2 0,d 2 1, andc 2 1 from the equations then yields the following simplified system: x3 + 2w3 −3ωx(w 2 +y 2)−6wy 2 = 1,(75) Here,ω≡e 2πi 3 . Theaboveequationisanalogoustoequa- tion (41) in theZ2 case. As in the caseZ2, let us define x= X Z,w= W Z andy= Y Z, then the projecti...

  6. [6]

    Factorization of the closure space The space of solutions to the equation (75) has closure components, which can be identified in the limitZ→0, as follows F(X, W, Y, Z= 0) =X 3 + 2W 3 −3ωX(W 2 +Y 2)−6W Y 2 = (ωX+ 2W)(ωX−W+ √ 3Y)(ωX−W− √ 3Y) = 0, (77) which are the union of threeCP1 inCP 2 [X, W, Y, Z= 0] which is in agreement to the factorization conjectu...

  7. [7]

    Algebras correspond to the first order singular points A generic pointpof the closure space (77) typically lies on one of the threeCP 1 components, with a first-order vanishing,ord(p) =r= 1. Therefore, if the conjecture of the emergence of nilpotent algebras holds, the cor- responding algebras associated with these points should take the formV ir×F, where...

  8. [8]

    The corresponding intersection points are pre- cisely given by (81)–(83)

    Algebras Correspond to the Singular Points As mentioned earlier, the closure space of theZ3 case in (77) consists of threeCP1 components that intersect pairwise. The corresponding intersection points are pre- cisely given by (81)–(83). Therefore, it is very interest- ing to explore the nature of the closure algebra related to these points for examining th...

  9. [9]

    However, they can all be reduced to a single independent equation

    Factorization of the Closure Space The number of equations in theZ4 case is quite large and is presented in Appendix A. However, they can all be reduced to a single independent equation. The con- straints (30) imply that the coefficients are not indepen- dent, leading to the following relations: d1 3 =id 1 1, d 1 2 = 0, d 2 3 =−d 2 1, d 3 3 =−id 3 1, d 3 ...

  10. [10]

    Belavin, A

    A. Belavin, A. Polyakov, and A. Zamolodchikov, Nuclear Physics B241, 333 (1984)

    1984

  11. [11]

    P.DiFrancesco, P.Mathieu, andD.Senechal,Conformal Field Theory, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1997)

    1997

  12. [12]

    Applied Conformal Field Theory

    P. Ginsparg, “Applied conformal field theory,” (1988), arXiv:hep-th/9108028 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  13. [13]

    Polchinski,String theory

    J. Polchinski,String theory. Vol. 1: An introduction to 18 the bosonic string, Cambridge Monographs on Mathe- matical Physics (Cambridge University Press, 2007)

    2007

  14. [14]

    Becker, M

    K. Becker, M. Becker, and J. H. Schwarz,String The- ory and M-Theory: A Modern Introduction(Cambridge University Press, 2006)

    2006

  15. [15]

    Blumenhagen, D

    R. Blumenhagen, D. Lüst, and S. Theisen,Basic con- cepts of string theory, Theoretical and Mathematical Physics (Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 2013)

    2013

  16. [16]

    Blumenhagen and E

    R. Blumenhagen and E. Plauschinn,Introduction to con- formal field theory: with applications to String theory, Vol. 779 (2009)

    2009

  17. [17]

    J. L. Cardy, Nuclear Physics B270, 186 (1986)

    1986

  18. [18]

    J. D. Brown and M. Henneaux, Communications in Mathematical Physics104, 207 (1986)

    1986

  19. [19]

    Bagchi and R

    A. Bagchi and R. Gopakumar, Journal of High Energy Physics2009, 037–037 (2009)

    2009

  20. [20]

    Classical central extension for asymptotic symmetries at null infinity in three spacetime dimensions

    G. Barnich and G. Compere, Class. Quant. Grav.24, F15 (2007), arXiv:gr-qc/0610130

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  21. [21]

    Serre,Lie Algebras and Lie Groups: 1964 Lectures Given at Harvard University, Lecture Notes in Mathe- matics No

    J. Serre,Lie Algebras and Lie Groups: 1964 Lectures Given at Harvard University, Lecture Notes in Mathe- matics No. no. 1500 (Springer, 1992)

    1964

  22. [22]

    Meurant,Introduction to Lie groups and Lie algebras, Pure and Applied Mathematics (Elsevier Science, 1973)

    G. Meurant,Introduction to Lie groups and Lie algebras, Pure and Applied Mathematics (Elsevier Science, 1973)

    1973

  23. [23]

    Conformal Field Theory and Statistical Mechanics

    J. Cardy, “Conformal field theory and statistical mechan- ics,” (2008), arXiv:0807.3472 [cond-mat.stat-mech]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  24. [24]

    Lectures on the Quantum Hall Effect

    D. Tong, “Lectures on the quantum hall effect,” (2016), arXiv:1606.06687 [hep-th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  25. [25]

    Fradkin,Quantum Field Theory: An Integrated Ap- proach(Princeton University Press, 2021)

    E. Fradkin,Quantum Field Theory: An Integrated Ap- proach(Princeton University Press, 2021)

    2021

  26. [26]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nuclear Physics B360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  27. [27]

    R. E. Borcherds, Proceedings of the Na- tional Academy of Sciences83, 3068 (1986), https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.83.10.3068

    work page doi:10.1073/pnas.83.10.3068 1986

  28. [28]

    Lepowsky and R

    J. Lepowsky and R. L. Wilson, Commun. Math. Phys. 62, 43 (1978)

    1978

  29. [29]

    Witten, Commun

    E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys.121, 351 (1989)

    1989

  30. [30]

    Quantum vertex algebras

    R. E. Borcherds, “Quantum vertex algebras,” (1999), arXiv:math/9903038 [math.QA]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  31. [31]

    I.Frenkel, J.Lepowsky, andA.Meurman,VERTEX OP- ERATOR ALGEBRAS AND THE MONSTER(1988)

    1988

  32. [32]

    I. B. Frenkel and Y. Zhu, Communications in Mathemat- ical Physics (1992)

    1992

  33. [33]

    I. B. Frenkel and V. G. Kac, Invent. Math.62, 23 (1980)

    1980

  34. [34]

    Goddard, A

    P. Goddard, A. Kent, and D. I. Olive, Commun. Math. Phys.103, 105 (1986)

    1986

  35. [35]

    R. V. Moody, Journal of Algebra10, 211 (1968)

    1968

  36. [36]

    Kac,Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras, Progress in mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 1990)

    V. Kac,Infinite-Dimensional Lie Algebras, Progress in mathematics (Cambridge University Press, 1990)

    1990

  37. [37]

    Verlinde, Nuclear Physics B300, 360 (1988)

    E. Verlinde, Nuclear Physics B300, 360 (1988)

    1988

  38. [38]

    G.W.MooreandN.Seiberg,Commun.Math.Phys.123, 177 (1989)

    1989

  39. [39]

    Goddard and D

    P. Goddard and D. I. Olive, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A1, 303 (1986)

    1986

  40. [40]

    G. W. Moore and N. Seiberg, Phys. Lett. B220, 422 (1989)

    1989

  41. [41]

    Lectures on the Langlands Program and Conformal Field Theory

    E. Frenkel, “Lectures on the langlands program and con- formal field theory,” (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0512172 [hep- th]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  42. [42]

    Witten, Commun

    E. Witten, Commun. Math. Phys.92, 455 (1984)

    1984

  43. [43]

    Gepner and E

    D. Gepner and E. Witten, Nuclear Physics B278, 493 (1986)

    1986

  44. [44]

    Sugawara, Phys

    H. Sugawara, Phys. Rev.170, 1659 (1968)

    1968

  45. [45]

    A. M. Polyakov, JETP Lett.12, 381 (1970)

    1970

  46. [46]

    Friedan, Z

    D. Friedan, Z. Qiu, and S. Shenker, Phys. Rev. Lett.52, 1575 (1984)

    1984

  47. [47]

    V. G. Knizhnik and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Nucl. Phys. B 247, 83 (1984)

    1984

  48. [48]

    V. G. Kac and A. K. Raina,Bombay Lectures on Highest Weight Representations of Infinite Dimensional Lie Al- gebras, Advanced Series in Mathematical Physics, Vol. 2 (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987) p. 145

    1987

  49. [49]

    B. L. Feigin and D. B. Fuchs, Functional Analysis and Its Applications16, 114 (1982)

    1982

  50. [50]

    V. A. Fateev and A. B. Zamolodchikov, Sov. Phys. JETP 62, 215 (1985)

    1985

  51. [51]

    L. J. Dixon, J. A. Harvey, C. Vafa, and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B261, 678 (1985)

    1985

  52. [52]

    L. J. Dixon, D. Friedan, E. J. Martinec, and S. H. Shenker, Nuclear Physics B282, 13 (1987)

    1987

  53. [53]

    Dijkgraaf, C

    R. Dijkgraaf, C. Vafa, E. Verlinde, and H. Ver- linde, Communications in Mathematical Physics123, 485 (1989)

    1989

  54. [54]

    Kontsevich, Letters in Mathematical Physics66, 157–216 (2003)

    M. Kontsevich, Letters in Mathematical Physics66, 157–216 (2003)

    2003

  55. [55]

    J. E. Moyal, Proc. Cambridge Phil. Soc.45, 99 (1949)

    1949

  56. [56]

    H. J. Groenewold, Physica12, 405 (1946)

    1946

  57. [57]

    J. M. Figueroa-O’Farrill, J. Math. Phys.30, 2735 (1989)

    1989

  58. [58]

    Levy-Nahas, Journal of Mathematical Physics8, 1211 (1967)

    M. Levy-Nahas, Journal of Mathematical Physics8, 1211 (1967)

    1967

  59. [59]

    S.Majid,JournalofMathematicalPhysics41,3892–3942 (2000)

    2000

  60. [60]

    Arzano and J

    M. Arzano and J. Kowalski-Glikman,Deformations of Spacetime Symmetries: Gravity, Group-Valued Mo- menta, and Non-Commutative Fields, Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 986 (2021)

    2021

  61. [61]

    Moshayedi, Lect

    N. Moshayedi, Lect. Notes Math.2311, pp. (2022)

    2022

  62. [62]

    Curtright, D

    T. Curtright, D. Fairlie, and C. Zachos,A Concise Trea- tise On Quantum Mechanics In Phase Space(World Sci- entific Publishing Company, 2013)

    2013

  63. [63]

    Itzykson and J

    C. Itzykson and J. M. Drouffe,STATISTICAL FIELD THEORY. VOL. 2: STRONG COUPLING, MONTE CARLO METHODS, CONFORMAL FIELD THEORY, AND RANDOM SYSTEMS, Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics (CUP, 1989)

    1989

  64. [64]

    M. B. Halpern and E. Kiritsis, Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 1373 (1989)

    1989

  65. [65]

    Halpern and J

    M. Halpern and J. P. Yamron, Nuclear Physics B351, 333 (1991)

    1991

  66. [66]

    Halpern and J

    M. Halpern and J. P. Yamron, Nuclear Physics B332, 411 (1990)

    1990

  67. [67]

    M. B. Halpern, E. Kiritsis, N. A. Obers, M. Porrati, and J. P. Yamron, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A5, 2275 (1990)

    1990

  68. [68]

    de Boer and M

    J. de Boer and M. B. Halpern, International Journal of Modern Physics A12, 1551–1605 (1997)

    1997

  69. [69]

    A. Y. MOROZOV, A. PERELOMOV, A. ROSLY, M. SHIFMAN, and A. TURBINER, International Jour- nal of Modern Physics A05, 803 (1990)

    1990

  70. [70]

    Zumino, J

    B. Zumino, J. Math. Phys.3, 1055 (1962)

    1962

  71. [71]

    H. G. Becker, Lett. Nuovo Cim., v. 8, no. 3, pp. 185-188 (1973), 10.1007/BF02906230

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02906230 1973

  72. [72]

    Greub,Linear Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics (Springer New York, 2012)

    W. Greub,Linear Algebra, Graduate Texts in Mathe- matics (Springer New York, 2012)

    2012

  73. [73]

    Thezn equivariant vi- rasoro algebra via alternative sugawara constructions,

    A. Ghazi and A. Moradpouri, “Thezn equivariant vi- rasoro algebra via alternative sugawara constructions,” (2025), arXiv:2512.00588 [hep-th]

    work page arXiv 2025

  74. [74]

    Schottenloher, ed.,A mathematical introduction to 19 conformal field theory, Vol

    M. Schottenloher, ed.,A mathematical introduction to 19 conformal field theory, Vol. 759 (2008)

    2008

  75. [75]

    Bauer and D

    M. Bauer and D. Bernard, Physics Reports432, 115–221 (2006)

    2006

  76. [76]

    Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory: a non-technical introduction

    P. Calabrese and J. Cardy, “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory: a non-technical introduction,” (2005), arXiv:quant-ph/0505193 [quant-ph]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  77. [77]

    Cardy, Annals of Physics318, 81–118 (2005)

    J. Cardy, Annals of Physics318, 81–118 (2005)

    2005

  78. [78]

    Felder, J

    G. Felder, J. Frohlich, and G. Keller, Commun. Math. Phys.124, 417 (1989)

    1989

  79. [79]

    V. G. Kac and D. A. Kazhdan, Adv. Math.34, 97 (1979)

    1979

  80. [80]

    Friedan and S

    D. Friedan and S. H. Shenker, Nucl. Phys. B281, 509 (1987)

    1987