pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.31538 · v1 · pith:R7W47VDWnew · submitted 2026-06-30 · ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Geometrically necessary boundaries accommodate the residual elastic strain in cold-rolled Fe-3%Si

Pith reviewed 2026-07-01 04:37 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords geometrically necessary boundariesresidual elastic straincold-rolled Fe-3%Sidark-field X-ray microscopyintragranular misorientationdislocation boundariesrecovery modelling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Geometrically necessary boundaries separate subdomains of distinct residual elastic strain in cold-rolled Fe-3%Si grains.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses dark-field X-ray microscopy to map both misorientation and elastic strain in three dimensions inside a grain of 50% cold-rolled Fe-3%Si. It finds that geometrically necessary boundaries mark abrupt changes in mean lattice spacing across the grain. Incidental dislocation boundaries and cell structures form inside regions of similar strain. This leads to the view that GNBs handle nearly all the long-range residual elastic strain while plastic deformation organizes into cells within those domains. The result gives experimental data for modeling recovery in ferritic steels.

Core claim

GNBs act as the primary carriers and distributors of long range residual elastic strain. GNBs separate subdomains of distinct mean d-spacing across the grain volume. The plastic misorientation associated with IDBs and dislocation cells develops within GNB-delimited subdomains that carry comparatively similar values of elastic strain.

What carries the argument

Dark-field X-ray microscopy (DFXM) providing simultaneous 3D bulk maps of intragranular misorientation and residual elastic strain at the scale of dislocation boundaries, correlated with segmented GNB locations.

If this is right

  • The three-dimensional misorientation and strain gradients provide direct experimental input for recovery and recrystallization modelling in ferritic steels.
  • GNBs accommodate nearly all the long-range residual elastic strain in the deformed state.
  • Plastic slip propagates into GNB interiors to organize into IDB cells with similar strain levels.
  • IDB cell structures develop within GNB-delimited subdomains that carry comparatively similar values of elastic strain.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The GNB-strain separation may appear in other BCC metals deformed by cold rolling.
  • Dislocation evolution simulations could treat long-range strain accommodation as a GNB property distinct from cell formation inside domains.
  • The non-destructive 3D technique could be applied during in-situ annealing to observe how these boundaries change in recovery.

Load-bearing premise

The DFXM reconstruction accurately captures the true bulk three-dimensional strain field without major artifacts from the imaging process or data segmentation.

What would settle it

A repeat DFXM measurement on the same sample with different beam conditions or segmentation parameters showing no spatial correlation between GNB locations and d-spacing jumps would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.31538 by Aditya Shukla, Can Yildirim, Nikolas Mavrikakis.

Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The relatively homogeneous distribution of second order lattice spacings [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The relationship between plastic deformation accommodation structures and residual elastic strain fields in deformed metals is poorly understood at the intragranular scale, largely because no experimental technique has provided simultaneous, three-dimensional, bulk-sensitive access to both fields at the length scale of dislocation boundaries. Here we use dark-field X-ray microscopy (DFXM) to map intragranular misorientation and residual elastic strain simultaneously in three dimensions within a grain of 50% cold-rolled Fe 3%Si alloy. We resolve geometrically necessary boundaries (GNBs) and incidental dislocation boundary (IDB) cell structures in the bulk non-destructively. Correlating the elastic strain field with the segmented plastically deformed substructure reveals that GNBs act as the primary carriers and distributors of long range residual elastic strain. GNBs separate subdomains of distinct mean d-spacing, across the grain volume. The plastic misorientation associated with IDBs and dislocation cells develops within GNB-delimited subdomains that carry comparatively similar values of elastic strain. This supports a mechanistic picture in which GNBs accommodate nearly all the long-range residual elastic strain in the deformed state, while plastic slip propagates into GNB interiors to organize into IDB cells with similar strain levels. The three-dimensional misorientation and strain gradients quantified here provide direct experimental input for recovery and recrystallization modelling in ferritic steels, such as electrical steels.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript uses dark-field X-ray microscopy (DFXM) to simultaneously map 3D intragranular misorientation and residual elastic strain within a grain of 50% cold-rolled Fe-3%Si. It reports that geometrically necessary boundaries (GNBs) separate subdomains of distinct mean d-spacing and act as the primary carriers of long-range residual elastic strain, while incidental dislocation boundaries (IDBs) and cell structures develop within GNB-delimited subdomains that exhibit comparatively uniform elastic strain. This leads to a mechanistic picture in which GNBs accommodate nearly all long-range strain and plastic slip organizes into IDB cells inside those domains. The work supplies 3D misorientation and strain gradients as input for recovery/recrystallization models in ferritic steels.

Significance. If the DFXM strain reconstructions are faithful, the simultaneous bulk-sensitive 3D mapping of both plastic substructure and elastic strain at the scale of dislocation boundaries constitutes a clear advance over prior 2D surface techniques. The explicit distinction between GNB and IDB roles in strain accommodation supplies falsifiable, quantitative constraints for constitutive models of deformed electrical steels.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results (correlation between GNBs and d-spacing)] The central claim that GNBs accommodate nearly all long-range residual elastic strain rests on the observed spatial coincidence between GNB locations and abrupt changes in mean d-spacing. However, the manuscript provides neither quantitative error bars on the reconstructed d-spacing values nor a validation of the boundary segmentation procedure that distinguishes GNBs from IDBs (see the results section describing the correlation between elastic strain field and segmented substructure).
  2. [Methods (DFXM reconstruction and segmentation)] No independent validation of the DFXM reconstruction fidelity is presented (e.g., comparison against known strain phantoms, forward modeling of beam divergence/absorption effects, or rocking-curve integration artifacts). This is load-bearing because the claim that GNBs carry the strain requires that the observed subdomain boundaries reflect true bulk elastic strain jumps rather than reconstruction-induced correlations.
  3. [Discussion (mechanistic picture)] The assertion that IDB cells develop within GNB-delimited subdomains carrying similar elastic strain is supported only by qualitative visual inspection within a single grain. No statistical quantification of strain variance inside versus across GNBs, nor data from additional grains, is supplied to substantiate the generalization that GNBs are the dominant long-range strain carriers.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Figures] Figure captions should explicitly state the voxel size, angular resolution, and any filtering thresholds applied to the DFXM data so that readers can assess the spatial scale of the reported subdomains.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states that GNBs 'accommodate nearly all' the long-range strain; this quantitative phrasing should be justified by a numerical estimate (e.g., fraction of total strain jump occurring at GNBs) in the main text.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report, which highlights both the potential significance of the work and areas where the presentation can be strengthened. We address each major comment below and indicate where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Results (correlation between GNBs and d-spacing)] The central claim that GNBs accommodate nearly all long-range residual elastic strain rests on the observed spatial coincidence between GNB locations and abrupt changes in mean d-spacing. However, the manuscript provides neither quantitative error bars on the reconstructed d-spacing values nor a validation of the boundary segmentation procedure that distinguishes GNBs from IDBs (see the results section describing the correlation between elastic strain field and segmented substructure).

    Authors: We agree that error bars and clearer segmentation details are needed to support the central claim. In the revised manuscript we will add quantitative error bars on the d-spacing values, obtained from the uncertainty in rocking-curve center-of-mass determination and propagated through the reconstruction algorithm. We will also expand the methods and results sections to describe the segmentation criteria (misorientation threshold, boundary continuity, and distinction between GNBs and IDBs) with explicit reference to the literature conventions used. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods (DFXM reconstruction and segmentation)] No independent validation of the DFXM reconstruction fidelity is presented (e.g., comparison against known strain phantoms, forward modeling of beam divergence/absorption effects, or rocking-curve integration artifacts). This is load-bearing because the claim that GNBs carry the strain requires that the observed subdomain boundaries reflect true bulk elastic strain jumps rather than reconstruction-induced correlations.

    Authors: This point is well taken. While the DFXM method has been validated in earlier publications, the present manuscript does not contain dataset-specific checks against phantoms or forward simulations. In revision we will add a dedicated paragraph discussing possible reconstruction artifacts (beam divergence, absorption, rocking-curve integration) and the experimental choices made to mitigate them. Full phantom validation or extensive new forward modeling lies outside the scope of the current study. revision: partial

  3. Referee: [Discussion (mechanistic picture)] The assertion that IDB cells develop within GNB-delimited subdomains carrying similar elastic strain is supported only by qualitative visual inspection within a single grain. No statistical quantification of strain variance inside versus across GNBs, nor data from additional grains, is supplied to substantiate the generalization that GNBs are the dominant long-range strain carriers.

    Authors: We will strengthen the discussion by adding quantitative measures of strain variance (standard deviation of d-spacing) computed inside GNB-delimited domains versus the jumps observed across GNBs. These statistics will be reported for the studied grain. The experiment was performed on a single representative grain; additional grains would require new beamtime and are not available in the present dataset. revision: partial

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Data from additional grains cannot be supplied without new experiments, as the presented results derive from a single grain.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: purely observational experimental mapping with no derivation chain

full rationale

The paper reports direct 3D DFXM measurements of intragranular misorientation and residual elastic strain in cold-rolled Fe-3%Si, followed by segmentation and spatial correlation between GNBs and d-spacing jumps. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations appear in the load-bearing steps; the claim follows from the raw reconstructed fields without reduction to inputs by construction. The analysis is self-contained against external experimental benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Experimental observation paper; central claim rests on validity of DFXM imaging physics and boundary segmentation rather than mathematical axioms or free parameters.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5792 in / 1180 out tokens · 36080 ms · 2026-07-01T04:37:23.880748+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Progress in Materials Science17, 5–177 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6425(73) 90001-7

    Bever, M.B., Holt, D.L., Titchener, A.L.: The stored energy of cold work. Progress in Materials Science17, 5–177 (1973) https://doi.org/10.1016/0079-6425(73) 90001-7

  2. [2]

    Acta Metallurgica 1(2), 153–162 (1953) https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(53)90054-6

    Nye, J.F.: Some geometrical relations in dislocated crystals. Acta Metallurgica 1(2), 153–162 (1953) https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(53)90054-6

  3. [3]

    Ashby, M.F.: The deformation of plastically non-homogeneous materials. The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics21(170), 399–424 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1080/14786437008238426 https://doi.org/10.1080/14786437008238426

  4. [4]

    Pergamon, Oxford, U.K

    Humphreys, F.J., Hatherly, M.: Recrystallization and Related Annealing Phe- nomena. Pergamon, Oxford, U.K. (1995)

  5. [6]

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A357(1756), 1471–1485 (1999) https://doi

    Hutchinson, B.: Deformation microstructures and textures in steels. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A357(1756), 1471–1485 (1999) https://doi. org/10.1098/rsta.1999.0385

  6. [7]

    Hansen, N., Jensen, D.J.: Deformed metals – structure, recrystallisation and strength. Mater. Sci. Technol.27(8), 1229–1240 (2011)

  7. [8]

    Acta Mater.46(16), 5819– 5838 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00229-8

    Liu, Q., Juul Jensen, D., Hansen, N.: Effect of grain orientation on deformation structure in cold-rolled polycrystalline aluminium. Acta Mater.46(16), 5819– 5838 (1998) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6454(98)00229-8

  8. [9]

    Hughes, D.A., Hansen, N., Bammann, D.J.: Geometrically necessary boundaries, incidental dislocation boundaries and geometrically necessary dislocations. Scr. Under review atMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Mater.48(2), 147–153 (2003) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6462(02)00358-5

  9. [10]

    Acta Mater.52(4), 1069–1081 (2004) https://doi

    Li, B.L., Godfrey, A., Meng, Q.C., Liu, Q., Hansen, N.: Microstructural evolution of if-steel during cold rolling. Acta Mater.52(4), 1069–1081 (2004) https://doi. org/10.1016/j.actamat.2003.10.040

  10. [11]

    Chen, Q.Z., Duggan, B.J.: On cells and microbands formed in an interstitial-free steel during cold rolling at low to medium reductions. Metall. Mater. Trans. A 35(11), 3423–3430 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-004-0178-5

  11. [12]

    Acta Mater

    Yu, T., Hansen, N., Huang, X.: Linking recovery and recrystallization through triple junction motion in aluminum cold rolled to a large strain. Acta Mater. 61(17), 6577–6586 (2013)

  12. [13]

    Materials Today15(9), 366–376 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(12) 70163-3

    Wilkinson, A.J., Britton, T.B.: Strains, planes, and ebsd in materials science. Materials Today15(9), 366–376 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(12) 70163-3

  13. [14]

    Acta Mater.50(2), 421–440 (2002) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00323-8

    Raabe, D., Zhao, Z., Park, S.-J., Roters, F.: Theory of orientation gradients in plastically strained crystals. Acta Mater.50(2), 421–440 (2002) https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1359-6454(01)00323-8

  14. [15]

    Simons, H., King, A., Ludwig, W., Detlefs, C., Pantleon, W., Schmidt, S., St¨ ohr, F., Snigireva, I., Snigirev, A., Poulsen, H.F.: Dark-field X-ray microscopy for multiscale structural characterization. Nat. Commun.6(1), 6098 (2015) https: //doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7098

  15. [16]

    Poulsen, H.F., Jakobsen, A.C., Simons, H., Ahl, S.R., Cook, P.K., Detlefs, C.: X- ray diffraction microscopy based on refractive optics. J. Appl. Crystallogr.50(5), 1441–1456 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1107/s1600576717011037

  16. [17]

    MRS Bulletin45(4), 277–282 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2020.89

    Yildirim, C., Cook, P., Detlefs, C., Simons, H., Poulsen, H.F.: Probing nanoscale structure and strain by dark-field x-ray microscopy. MRS Bulletin45(4), 277–282 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2020.89 . Accessed 2026-06-22

  17. [18]

    Zelenika, A., Cretton, A.A.W., Frankus, F., Borgi, S., Grumsen, F.B., Yildirim, C., Detlefs, C., Winther, G., Poulsen, H.F.: Observing formation and evolution of dislocation cells during plastic deformation. Sci. Rep.15(1), 8655 (2025)

  18. [19]

    Yildirim, C., Mavrikakis, N., Cook, P.K., Rodriguez-Lamas, R., Kutsal, M., Poulsen, H.F., Detlefs, C.: 4D microstructural evolution in a heavily deformed fer- ritic alloy: A new perspective in recrystallisation studies. Scr. Mater.214, 114689 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2022.114689

  19. [20]

    Yildirim, C., Shukla, A., Zhang, Y., Mavrikakis, N., Lesage, L., Sanna, V., Sarkis, M., Li, Y., La Bella, M., Detlefs, C., Poulsen, H.F.: 3D/4D imaging of complex and deformed microstructures with pink-beam dark field X-ray microscopy. Commun. Under review atMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Mater.6(1), 198 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-...

  20. [21]

    IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2026)

    Henningsson, A., Frankus, F.T., Cretton, A.A.W., Shukla, A., Gayoso Padula, A., La Bella, M., Haack, J., Staeck, S., Poulsen, H.F., Winther, G.: Multi-peak diffrac- tion analysis for enhanced orientation mapping in dark-field x-ray microscopy of deformed metals using darling. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2026). Submitted to th...

  21. [22]

    IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2026)

    Shukla, A., Henningsson, A., Cretton, A.A.W., Yildirim, C.: Direct visualiza- tion, segmentation and quantification of dislocation cells in cold-rolled fe-3% si using dark-field x-ray microscopy. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (2026). Submitted to the proceedings of the 46th Risø International Symposium on Materials Science: Char...

  22. [23]

    Shukla, A., Yildirim, C., Ball, J.A.D., Detlefs, C., Cretton, A.A.W., Sarkis, M., Bella, M.L., Ludwig, W., Zhang, Y., Henningsson, N.A.: Bridging Grain Map- ping and Dark Field X-ray Microscopy for Multiscale Diffraction Imaging. arXiv. [arXiv:2508.17897] (2025). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.17897

  23. [24]

    Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science24(2), 100818 (2020)

    Wright, J., Giacobbe, C., Majkut, M.: New opportunities at the materials science beamline at esrf to exploit high energy nano-focus x-ray beams. Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science24(2), 100818 (2020)

  24. [25]

    Isern, H., Brochard, T., Dufrane, T., Brumund, P., Papillon, E., Scortani, D., Hino, R., Yildirim, C., Lamas, R.R., Li, Y., Sarkis, M., Detlefs, C.: The ESRF dark-field x-ray microscope at ID03. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.3010(1), 012163 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/3010/1/012163

  25. [26]

    IEEE Trans

    Adams, R., Bischof, L.: Seeded region growing. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.16(6), 641–647 (1994) https://doi.org/10.1109/34.295913

  26. [27]

    Microscopy and Microanalysis17, 316–329 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1017/S1431927611000055

    Wright, S.I., Nowell, M.M., Field, D.P.: A review of strain analysis using electron backscatter diffraction. Microscopy and Microanalysis17, 316–329 (2011) https: //doi.org/10.1017/S1431927611000055

  27. [28]

    Scripta Materialia58, 994–997 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.050

    Pantleon, W.: Resolving the geometrically necessary dislocation content by con- ventional electron backscattering diffraction. Scripta Materialia58, 994–997 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scriptamat.2008.01.050

  28. [29]

    Materials Characterization66, 56–67 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.02.001

    Kamaya, M.: Assessment of local deformation using ebsd: Quantification of local damage at grain boundaries. Materials Characterization66, 56–67 (2012) https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.matchar.2012.02.001

  29. [30]

    Mavrikakis, N., Detlefs, C., Cook, P.K., Kutsal, M., Campos, A.P.C., Gauvin, M., Under review atMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A. Calvillo, P.R., Saikaly, W., Hubert, R., Poulsen, H.F., Vaugeois, A., Zapolsky, H., Mangelinck, D., Dumont, M., Yildirim, C.: A multi-scale study of the interaction of sn solutes with dislocations during static recove...

  30. [31]

    Ferrer, J.G., Rodr´ ıguez-Lamas, R., Payno, H., De Nolf, W., Cook, P., Jover, V.A.S., Yildirim, C., Detlefs, C.: darfix – data analysis for dark-field X-ray microscopy. J. Synchrotron Radiat.30(3), 527–537 (2023) https://doi.org/10. 1107/s1600577523001674

  31. [32]

    Sanna, V., Zhang, Y., Ludwig, W., Shukla, A., Benhadjira, A., Sarkis, M., Yildirim, C.: 3D mapping of intragranular residual strain and microstructure in recrystallized iron using dark-field x-ray microscopy (2026) arXiv:2603.08968 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]

  32. [33]

    org/10.3390/met14101127

    Gao, Y., Xu, Y., Chen, H., Yuan, B., Gao, Z., Zhou, L.: Dislocation strengthening and texture evolution of non-oriented fe-3.3 wtMetals14(10) (2024) https://doi. org/10.3390/met14101127

  33. [34]

    Acta Materialia48(8), 1897–1905 (2000) https://doi.org/10

    Godfrey, A., Hughes, D.A.: Scaling of the spacing of deformation induced dislo- cation boundaries. Acta Materialia48(8), 1897–1905 (2000) https://doi.org/10. 1016/S1359-6454(99)00474-7

  34. [35]

    Acta Metallurgica31(9), 1367–1379 (1983) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(83)90007-X

    Mughrabi, H.: Dislocation wall and cell structures and long-range internal stresses in deformed metal crystals. Acta Metallurgica31(9), 1367–1379 (1983) https: //doi.org/10.1016/0001-6160(83)90007-X

  35. [36]

    Read, W.T., Shockley, W.: Dislocation models of crystal grain boundaries. Phys. Rev.78, 275–289 (1950) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.78.275

  36. [37]

    International Journal of Plasticity45, 44–60 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.10.003

    Kassner, M.E., Geantil, P., Levine, L.E.: Long range internal stresses in single- phase crystalline materials. International Journal of Plasticity45, 44–60 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijplas.2012.10.003 . In Honor of Rob Wagoner

  37. [38]

    Journal of Applied Physics43(8), 3293–3301 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1661710

    Dever, D.J.: Temperature dependence of the elastic constants in a-iron single crystals: relationship to spin order and diffusion anomalies. Journal of Applied Physics43(8), 3293–3301 (1972) https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1661710

  38. [39]

    Progress in Materials Science42(1), 39–58 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(97)00007-8

    Doherty, R.D.: Recrystallization and texture. Progress in Materials Science42(1), 39–58 (1997) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6425(97)00007-8

  39. [40]

    Materials Science and Technology32(13), 1303–1315 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2016.1231746 https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2016.1231746

    Kestens, L.A.I., Pirgazi, H.: Texture formation in metal alloys with cubic crystal structures. Materials Science and Technology32(13), 1303–1315 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2016.1231746 https://doi.org/10.1080/02670836.2016.1231746

  40. [41]

    Detlefs, C., Henningsson, A., Kanesalingam, B., Cretton, A.A., Corley-Wiciak, Under review atMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A. C., Frankus, F.T., Pal, D., Irvine, S., Borgi, S., Poulsen, H.F., et al.: Oblique diffraction geometry for the observation of several non-coplanar bragg reflections under identical illumination. Applied Crystallography58...

  41. [42]

    Scientific Reports14(1), 20213 (2024) Under review atMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A

    Henningsson, A., Kutsal, M., Wright, J.P., Ludwig, W., Sørensen, H.O., Hall, S.A., Winther, G., Poulsen, H.F.: Microstructure and stress mapping in 3d at industrially relevant degrees of plastic deformation. Scientific Reports14(1), 20213 (2024) Under review atMetallurgical and Materials Transactions A